DOCSLIB.ORG

DELAWARE Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DELAWARE Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment U.S DELAWARE Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency in partnership with the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control November 2006 ABSTRACT Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Credit Corporation (USDA/CCC), and the State of Delaware have agreed to implement the Delaware Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP), a component of the national Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). CREP is a voluntary program for agricultural landowners. CREP is authorized by the provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended (1985 Act) (16 U.S.C. 3830 et seq.), and its regulations at 7 CFR Part 1410. In accordance with the 1985 Act, USDA/CCC is seeking authorization to enroll lands into the Delaware CREP through December 31, 2007. Type of Document: Programmatic Environmental Assessment Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency For Further Information: Cheryl Z. Butler, Program Manager Conservation and Environmental Programs Division U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency 1400 Independence Ave. S.W., Mail Stop 0513 Washington, DC 20250 202-720-6304 Email: [email protected] http://content.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/cepd/epb/nepa.htm ***************************************************************************** The Delaware Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Programmatic Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347); the Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508); USDA-Farm Service Agency draft environmental regulations (7 CFR Part 799.4, Subpart G); and USDA-Farm Service Agency 1-EQ, Revision 1, Environmental Quality Programs, dated November 19, 2004. ************************************************************************ Cover Photos Credits: top left, bald eagle, courtesy of National Wildlife Federation website http://www.nwf.org; top right, northern bobwhite quail, Assateague Naturalist http://www.assateague.com/bobwhite.html; lower right, Nanticoke River, courtesy of Tom Darby, http://www.nanticokeriver.net/; and lower left, warm season grass filter strip, USDA-NRCS. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 The Commodity Credit Corporation, Farm Service Agency, and the State of Delaware propose to improve the water quality of the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and Inland Bays basin watersheds by continuing a joint Federal-State agricultural land conservation program aimed at retiring marginal cropland and pastureland from further production. This program, known as the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP), would use the authorities of the Federal Conservation Reserve Program in combination with State resources to target specific lands to meet conservation and environmental objectives. In response to this proposed Federal action, the Farm Service Agency is preparing a programmatic environmental assessment, in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), to evaluate alternatives to this action and the potential benefits and environmental consequences of these alternatives. In compliance with 40 CFR §1501.7 of the Council on Environmental Quality’s regulations implementing NEPA, FSA initiated scoping by notifying Federal, State, and local agencies, and other interested parties about its intent to prepare a programmatic environmental assessment (PEA) on the Delaware CREP. In addition to the scoping letters, FSA also publicly announced its intent to prepare a PEA in the Delaware State News on January 29, 2006, and the Delmarva Farmer on January 31, 2006. Comments were accepted on the proposed action until February 9, 2006. In response to these announcements, six comments were received. A summary of the comments and responses is presented in Chapter 2. The proposed Delaware CREP would consist of a special continuous sign-up CRP component and a State incentive program, and would target up to 10,000 acres in the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and Inland Bays basin areas for enrollment into the program. The purpose of the Delaware CREP is to improve water quality and enhance wildlife habitat in the coastal plain of the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and Inland Bays basin watersheds. To accomplish this purpose, CREP implements conservation measures designed to minimize drainage and reduce the sedimentation and nutrient runoff from agricultural lands into sensitive waterbodies. The need for this program is to improve water quality and thereby further the goal of restoring designated uses of Delaware’s waterbodies and enhance wildlife habitat for the State’s declining species. This programmatic environmental assessment evaluates two alternatives to the proposed action: Alternative 1-No Action (Existing Program) and Alternative 2-Expanded and Enhanced Delaware CREP Agreement (Agency’s Preferred Alternative). Alternative 1 considers the No Action option, which evaluates the effects of maintaining the existing program and its components. Alternative 1 would continue until December 31, 2007, would allow up to 6,000 acres to be enrolled into the Delaware CREP, and would continue to offer the same conservation practices: • CP3A-Hardwood Tree Planting • CP4D-Permanent Wildlife Habitat • CP21-Filter Strips • CP22-Riparian Buffers • CP23-Wetland Restoration Alternative2-Expanded and Enhanced Delaware CREP Agreement (Agency’s Preferred Alternative), expands the area for enrollment into the program from 6,000 acres to 10,000 acres. It consists of a special continuous sign-up CRP component and a State incentive program. The area includes acreage in the Chesapeake, Delaware and Inland Bays basin adjoining drainage ditches, streams, and other waterbodies identified as Category I and II impaired segments in Delaware’s Unified Watershed Assessment and Watershed Restoration Priorities List (Oct. 1, Final PEA for Delaware CREP 3 1998). In addition to the CRP practices identified for Alternative 1, Alternative 2 proposes to add the following CRP practices: • CP9-Shallow Water Areas for Wildlife, and • CP23A-Wetland Restoration, Non-Floodplain. Alternative 2 also proposes to amend CP4D by increasing the acreage allowed from 5 acres to 10 acres per tract or 10 percent of a tract, whichever is greater and to allow the county committee to approve larger enrollments on a case-by-case basis. Alternative 2 is the FSA’s preferred alternative and the environmentally preferred alternative. The Delaware CREP was established in 1999 with a designated goal of improving water quality and enhancing wildlife habitat in the coastal plain geographic areas of the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and Inland Bays basin watersheds. Delaware CREP is a voluntary, incentive- based Federal program that pays farmers and landowners’ payments and incentives in exchange for installing certain conservation practices on environmentally sensitive land. These conservation practices are designed to improve water quality, enhance wildlife habitat, and conserve soil. Delaware CREP allows farm owners and operators to enroll lower productive acreage into the program under 10- to 15-year contracts. Landowners can choose to plant trees, native warm- season grasses, or cool season grasses in sensitive areas where crops were once cultivated. In return, landowners would receive cost-share, annual rental payments, and generous incentive payments from the Federal and State governments. CCC and the State of Delaware signed the initial Delaware CREP Agreement on June 2, 1999. An addendum to this agreement followed a year later and was signed in July 2000. In September 2000, the Delaware CREP Agreement was revised and signed in December 2002 by CCC and DNREC. Amendment 1 to this agreement is currently being proposed to add two CRP practices as eligible, allow larger enrollments per tract for one practice, expand the areas eligible, and increase the overall acreage goal from 6,000 acres to 10,000 acres. Cooperating agencies supporting Delaware CREP include: • the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Division of Soil & Water Conservation; • the Delaware Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; • the conservation districts from Kent, New Castle, and Sussex Counties; and • USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service The goals established by the Delaware CREP are to-- • reduce nutrient and sediment loadings to impaired streams; • meet temperature and dissolved oxygen criteria necessary to support biology and wildlife; and • increase upland wildlife habitat and create wildlife corridors. In August 2006, a Notice of Availability of the draft PEA was published in local newspapers and on the FSA website announcing the availability of the document and inviting agency and public comments until October 12, 2006. Letters were also mailed to agencies advising them of the availability of the draft PEA. The Delaware Coastal Management Program submitted a determination that the Delaware CREP was consistent with Federal and State coastal zone policies. No other comments were received. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was issued for the DECREP in October 2006. 4 Table ES-1: Comparison of Delaware CREP Alternatives, 2006 Program Alternative 1-No Action (Existing Alternative 2-Expanded and Component Conditions) Enhanced Delaware CREP Agreement (Agency’s Preferred Alternative) Program Expiration December 31, 2007 December 31, 2007
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pencader Philadelphia Pike and Brandywine Valley Red Clay Mill and History Tour Stanton-Newark
    TAL06082-Map3 8/14/06 10:00 AM Page 1 S d Rd R 82 r Valle yle w Rd k ve y P 491 W vie e a R ood e e r d C T B e C B G h C h r e a d a d o e d k e a m i p k y R k R R i m 1 p R 841 N P a ll P Brandywine e h s s e r i d Z N e b w r o e c d d u M d d o n b r e p R o O r R G o r Town Center l m R e h u i r e t R Flint t l Rd d e PHILADELPHIAg PIKE AND r e y s d t l l d l u l a R i h n d d d o d R M RED CLAY MILL AND HISTORY TOURR t h a n l n nt R g ti le K il ur g 261 R e l C B i e 796 B R i e d P C e l c d H n i r e h n M Woods l d r e r M i d tt C i b n k R t B R n a d n amsey E d s r M R e n h R tt Rd u l t d o G e nne B i d Ke 52 l h Old C s r y e m l r e e d R d 100 S Brandywine a B e Duration: Approximately 90 minutes r l l d 92 M n i a W N l Stat M Perry Park aa u e Rd d M w o Jester ma e S t i ff ns Bechtal l R T C d o R b t S l l u h R d d d e N il n d Park a t a School Park ta R S d e la R R l Marcus Balt S e M O l imore Pike Pennsylvania d g w G r d l d S S d BRANDYWINE VALLEY r O w d n d A 13 r K d s u k e d R e g R i b s h R t u n r l Hook R n i R v N e et F d d b R a n e e g v t d C M B R n a r n e n ente o u Harvey t e o i t d A r i R D i n t R k n e d g e r l P A r n u h Take a tour of the Red Clay Mill industry, powered k s y o 3 a e i g e e t d t a p k G y Mill Park u r p l e d 4.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex County
    501 ALLOWANCES AND APPROPRIATIONS. Dolls. Ct,. Amount brought forward, 3,3137 58 To Lowder T. Layton, for damages on new road, 15 00 Albert Webster, do do 05 Appropriation for opening and making said road, 20 00 William K. Lockwood, commissioner on road, 2 days, 2 00 Albert Webster, do 3 3 00 T. L. Davis, do 3 3 00 George Jones, do 2 2 00 William Nickerson, do 2 2 00 Alexander Johnson, surveyor, 7 00 John Cox, for damages on road, 50 00 William Slay, do 06 David Marvel, do 06 Martha Day, do 06 Appropriation to open and make said road, 150 00 $3,642 31 March Session. Thomas S. Buckmaster, for overwork under a resolu- tion, 3 89 Isaac L. Crouch, for work on jail, 87 Joshua Nickerson, for work on a bridge, 2 08 S. C. Leatherberry, cryer of the courts, 20 62 Joab Fox, for work on a bridge, 9 87 James Jones, assessor for Duck Creek hundred, 29 38 Nathan Soward, Little Creek " 25 56 William Slaughter, Dover, " 27 56 John Sherwood, Murderkill, " 34 02 John Quillen, Milford, " 26 46 Henry W. Harrington, Mispillion, " 27 00 Dr. Isaac Jump, for medicine for prisoners in jail, 4 50 William Hirons, commissioner on road, 1 00 Thomas Stevenson, justice peace, for fees, 15 35 Alexander J. Taylor, late sheriff, board of prisoners and fees, 352 51 James B. Richardson, coroner, for fees, 17 23 John P. Coombe, justice of the peace, for fees, I 00 George Smith, commissioner oo new road, 1 00 Joho Ha wk ins, for excess of tax, for the years 1848-9, 12 98 John Sherwood, for services dividing school districts, I 00 Am,unt carried forward, $4,356 19 502 ALLOWANCES AND APPROPRIATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Blues 2021 Festival Guide
    Compiled by Melanie Young Specific dates are provided where possible. However, some festivals had not set their 2021 dates at press time. Due to COVID-19, some dates are tentative. Please contact the festivals directly for the latest information. You can also view this list year-round at www.LivingBlues.com. Living Blues Festival Guide ALABAMA Foley BBQ & Blues Cook-Off March 13, 2021 Blues, Bikes & BBQ Festival Juneau Jazz & Classics Heritage Park TBA TBA Foley, Alabama Alabama International Dragway Juneau, Alaska 251.943.5590 2021Steele, Alabama 907.463.3378 www.foleybbqandblues.net www.bluesbikesbbqfestival.eventbrite.com jazzandclassics.org W.C. Handy Music Festival Johnny Shines Blues Festival Spenard Jazz Fest July 16-27, 2021 TBA TBA Florence, Alabama McAbee Activity Center Anchorage, Alaska 256.766.7642 Tuscaloosa, Alabama spenardjazzfest.org wchandymusicfestival.com 205.887.6859 23rd Annual Gulf Coast Ethnic & Heritage Jazz Black Belt Folk Roots Festival ARIZONA Festival TBA Chandler Jazz Festival July 30-August 1, 2021 Historic Greene County Courthouse Square Mobile, Alabama April 8-10, 2021 Eutaw, Alabama Chandler, Arizona 251.478.4027 205.372.0525 gcehjazzfest.org 480.782.2000 blackbeltfolkrootsfestival.weebly.com chandleraz.gov/special-events Spring Fling Cruise 2021 Alabama Blues Week October 3-10, 2021 Woodystock Blues Festival TBA May 8-9, 2021 Carnival Glory Cruise from New Orleans, Louisiana Tuscaloosa, Alabama to Montego Bay, Jamaica, Grand Cayman Islands, Davis Camp Park 205.752.6263 Bullhead City, Arizona and Cozumel,
    [Show full text]
  • Principal Fortifications of the United States (1870–1875)
    Principal Fortifications of the United States (1870–1875) uring the late 18th century and through much of the 19th century, army forts were constructed throughout the United States to defend the growing nation from a variety of threats, both perceived and real. Seventeen of these sites are depicted in a collection painted especially for Dthe U.S. Capitol by Seth Eastman. Born in 1808 in Brunswick, Maine, Eastman found expression for his artistic skills in a military career. After graduating from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, where offi­ cers-in-training were taught basic drawing and drafting techniques, Eastman was posted to forts in Wisconsin and Minnesota before returning to West Point as assistant teacher of drawing. Eastman also established himself as an accomplished landscape painter, and between 1836 and 1840, 17 of his oils were exhibited at the National Academy of Design in New York City. His election as an honorary member of the academy in 1838 further enhanced his status as an artist. Transferred to posts in Florida, Minnesota, and Texas in the 1840s, Eastman became interested in the Native Americans of these regions and made numerous sketches of the people and their customs. This experience prepared him for his next five years in Washington, D.C., where he was assigned to the commissioner of Indian Affairs and illus­ trated Henry Rowe Schoolcraft’s important six-volume Historical and Statistical Information Respecting the History, Condition, and Prospects of the Indian Tribes of the United States. During this time Eastman also assisted Captain Montgomery C. Meigs, superintendent of the Capitol Brevet Brigadier General Seth Eastman.
    [Show full text]
  • The Results of the Phase II Deldot Investigations at 7NC-E 53 Indicate
    SITE INTERPRETATIONS The results of the Phase II DelDOT investigations at 7NC-E­ 53 indicate that the historic component of the site is undisturbed and in good condition. The site represents a farmstead and possible landing operation dating from the mid­ eighteenth to nineteenth century, and was owned at one time by a prominent local merchant, John Read. The site was occupied continuously throughout the nineteenth century, yet there is archaeological evidence that middle-to-late eighteenth century deposits are present in good stratigraphic contexts. Much of the site, particularly around the foundation, is unplowed. The historic artifacts recovered show archaeological evidence of historic sheet refuse disposal patterns. WILLIAM DICKSON SITE (7NC-E-82) INVESTIGATIONS SITE mSTORY Of all three sites investigated in the Patterson Lane Site Complex, the Dickson Site is the most difficult to trace historically. The site's history is easily followed backwards in time until 1844, then the trail of deed transactions and property transfers becomes murky and fragmentary. Table 8 presents a summary of the deed transactions for the Dickson Site. The property, which is presently owned by William T. Neal, Jr., was acquired by William T. Neal, Sr., in 1919 from George W. Butler of Christiana Village (NCCD N-28-260). Butler had bought the land, which consisted of 5.7 acres, from the heirs of Daniel Heisler Egbert in 1912 for $1000. There was a bUilding present 109 " ' TABLE 8 I DICKSON SITE (7NC-E-82), SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS Name (from/to) Reference Date Acreage Cost William T. Neal, WCCH N-28-260 11-15-1919 5.7a $500 from George Butler and wife, WCCH George Butler, WCCH B-24-184 9-11-1912 5.7a $1,000 from Henderson R.
    [Show full text]
  • Delawarehousejournal
    UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE THE LIBRARY \J ...,, ~. ;"'iY/:'4 .!"· ,II /J )' ;!':'. ·,;.r J $·7~ •7.f.-.f'.' J't' ~ JOURNAL OF THE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AT A SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSE:M:BLY, CONVEXED AND HELD AT DOVER, ON TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY, IN THE YEAR OF OUU f,ORD ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY-THREE, AND OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE UI\JITED ST ATES, THE SEVENTY.SEVENTH. DOVER, DELAWARE: ~· KIMMEY, PRINTER, 1853. • .. • • • • • • • • • f' • • • • • .v".. :.. ". ·.~;: \ ... :· :·.: =·~: : ·.. : . ... ... ; . .... ,, . .. .. .. \ I . •H., \ ~ ,./, ... ,, .. ·-. ,.., '"1t"- ~. ,.,,.: • '. '.\.., l "" ~ ' , : :·: : :·:: . : : .. : ... : : : ·.•: ... :: ... ........ ... ...... :.-. : .. : ..~: : . : • • • : ... u • ... • : •••• : . ·.: ... ... ... .. .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ··: ... .. =~~:· ... • . ... ... .. •. ... .. ... .. .. ..• _I • . .... ... e .. .. ... .. ... :·:.. .. .... ... Gx,::, -·r. t: \. ~ ~ -~ .. , t \·\' • I cl t.. \·1 --~. ~.. · JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF DELA\VARE. At a sessio11 ef the General Assembly, convened and held at Dover, on Tuesday, the fourth day ef January, in the year ef our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-three, and of the Independence ef the United States ef America, the seventy-seventh. Messrs. James Delaplaine, Jesher H. Dixon, Alexander M. Biddle, Charles Gooding, Joshua S. Vaientine, John A. Reynolds and Ephraim Beaston, of New Castle county; and Messrs. Benjamin L. Collins, John G. Chambers, Paris T. Carlisle, Eli Saulsbury, Merritt Scotten,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Piedmont Forests
    Spring 2009 Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities Robert Coxe Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the contributions and help from the following people for this edition of the Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities. Karen Bennett, Greg Moore and Janet Dennis of the Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Bill McAvoy of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Dr. John Kartesz of the Biota of North America Program Dr. Keith Clancy and Pete Bowman, Ecologists, formerly of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Ery Largay and Leslie Sneddon of Natureserve All people unmentioned who made countless contributions to this document. -Take me to the vegetation community keys- Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Introduction The Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities is intended to provide a Delaware flavor to the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS). All common names of communities, except for those not in the NVCS, follow the NVCS. This document is designed for the web and CD only, but desired sections can be printed by users. In this matter, paper and therefore trees can be preserved and impacts to the communities discussed within can be minimized. In spirit of saving these communities please only print those community descriptions that you will use or print none at all. The State of Delaware covers 1,524,863.4 acres of which 1,231,393.6 acres are terrestrial and 293,469.8 acres are water (Table 1). Currently 130 vegetation communities are known to occur in Delaware. Some of the largest vegetation communities/land covers in the state include: Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Railroad Byway Delaware
    Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway Delaware Chapter 3.0 Intrinsic Resource Assessment The following Intrinsic Resource Assessment chapter outlines the intrinsic resources found along the corridor. The National Scenic Byway Program defines an intrinsic resource as the cultural, historical, archeological, recreational, natural or scenic qualities or values along a roadway that are necessary for designation as a Scenic Byway. Intrinsic resources are features considered significant, exceptional and distinctive by a community and are recognized and expressed by that community in its comprehensive plan to be of local, regional, statewide or national significance and worthy of preservation and management (60 FR 26759). Nationally significant resources are those that tend to draw travelers or visitors from regions throughout the United States. National Scenic Byway CMP Point #2 An assessment of the intrinsic qualities and their context (the areas surrounding the intrinsic resources). The Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway offers travelers a significant amount of Historical and Cultural resources; therefore, this CMP is focused mainly on these resource categories. The additional resource categories are not ignored in this CMP; they are however, not at the same level of significance or concentration along the corridor as the Historical and Cultural resources. The resources represented in the following chapter provide direct relationships to the corridor story and are therefore presented in this chapter. A map of the entire corridor with all of the intrinsic resources displayed can be found on Figure 6. Figures 7 through 10 provide detailed maps of the four (4) corridors segments, with the intrinsic resources highlighted. This Intrinsic Resource Assessment is organized in a manner that presents the Primary (or most significant resources) first, followed by the Secondary resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorezone Fish and Blue Crab Survey of Rehoboth Bay, Indian River Bay, and Little Assawoman Bay for 2018
    Shorezone Fish and Blue Crab Survey of Rehoboth Bay, Indian River Bay, and Little Assawoman Bay For 2018 Andrew McGowan, and Dennis Bartow Delaware Center for the Inland Bays 39375 Inlet Rd Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971 September 2020 Report may be accessed via www.inlandbays.org © Delaware Center for the Inland Bays 2020 All Rights Reserved Citation Format McGowan, A.T., and D.H. Bartow. 2020. Shorezone fish and Blue Crab survey of Rehoboth Bay, Indian River and Bay and Little Assawoman Bay for 2018. Delaware Center for the Inland Bays, Rehoboth Beach, DE. 71 pp. Cover photo: Pinfish (Lagodon rhomboides), credit Dennis Bartow. The Delaware Center for the Inland Bays is a non-profit organization and a National Estuary Program. It was created to promote the wise use and enhancement of the Inland Bays watershed by conducting public outreach and education, developing and implementing restoration projects, encouraging scientific inquiry and sponsoring needed research, and establishing a long-term process for the protection and preservation of the Inland Bays watershed. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................ iii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2 Methods and Materials .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Kids Back to Nature by Theresa Gawlas Medoff
    Child’s Play Bringing Kids Back to Nature By Theresa Gawlas Medoff 24 / O UTDOOR D ELAWARE Winter 2012 the Kaiser Family Foundation, today’s to connect with nature, and to gain school-age children spend 6.5 hours a day a sense of stewardship,” says Rachael with electronic media — and just minutes Phillos, nature center manager at Killens playing outdoors in unstructured activi- Pond State Park. ties. That’s a statistic that the folks at DN- The Educational Side REC’s Division of Parks and Recreation State park naturalists say that they are are acutely aware of, and one they are astounded sometimes by the naivety of trying their best to turn around. The some of the children who come to the Participants in Bellevue major part of the mission of Delaware parks on school fi eld trips. “They step off State Park’s Youth Fishing Tournament State Parks has always been to get people the bus and see more than four trees to- show off their catch. outside and into nature, says Ray Bivens, gether and think they are in the jungle,” DNREC operations, maintenance and Phillos says. programming section administrator. But “We often have kids who’ve never at a time when children are increasingly been in a forest before,” adds Angel nature deprived, our parks are doing Burns, naturalist at White Clay Creek more than ever to attract families by add- State Park. “They’re very concerned ing new programs, making people aware about going into the woods and want to of existing offerings, and increasing the know if there are bears out there.” accessibility of the parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: Dwellings of the Rural Elite in Central Delaware, 1770-1830 +/-______4
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Hill Island Farm___________________________________ other name/site number: Noxontown Farm, CRS# N-5898__________________ 2. Location street & number: 3379 Dupont Parkway (U.S. Route 13)_________________ not for publication: N/A :ity/town: Odessa, Appoquinimink Hundred_____ vicinity: X state: DE county: New Castle_______ code: 003 zip code: 19709 3. Classification Ownership of Property: private___________________________________ Category of Property: building_________________________________ Mumber of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing 1 4 buildings 0 0 sites 0 0 structures 0 0 objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0__________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: Dwellings of the Rural Elite in Central Delaware, 1770-1830 +/-_________________________ ___ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National^ Register Criteria. See continuation sheet. // Signature of certifying official Date Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. X See continuation sheet. ignature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 5.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Delaware - 10 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District KENT 2 - XXX A MCGINNIS POND ACCESS DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $50,250.00 C 12/20/1966 12/20/1968 1 3 - XXX A KILLENS POND STATE PARK DIV. OF PARKS & RECREATION $251,515.00 C 8/19/1967 9/1/1968 1 7 - XXX A MILFORD NECK DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $115,450.00 C 4/22/1967 4/22/1969 1 8 - XXX A ANDREWS LAKE ACCESS DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $10,562.50 C 4/20/1967 4/20/1969 1 10 - XXX A WOODLAND BEACH DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $11,000.00 C 4/3/1967 4/3/1969 1 11 - XXX A WOODLAND BEACH ACCESS DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $7,500.00 C 4/3/1967 4/3/1969 1 13 - XXX A LITTLE CREEK WILDLIFE AREA DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $33,000.00 C 5/25/1967 5/25/1969 1 14 - XXX A BLACKISTON WILDLIFE AREA DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $55,000.00 C 6/1/1967 6/1/1969 1 16 - XXX A BLACKISTON WILDLIFE AREA DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $101,250.00 C 6/2/1967 11/1/1967 1 20 - XXX A PETERSBURG-WRIGHT PROPERTY DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE $17,750.00 C 12/19/1967 12/19/1969 1 25 - XXX A PETERSBURG-RASH DIV.
    [Show full text]