International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) May Be Further Implemented in Norwegian Law
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guiden2020 Engelsk Low.Pdf
2020/2021 www.sognefjord.no Welcome to the Sognefjord – all year! The Sognefjord – Fjord Norways longest and most spectacular fjord with the Flåm railway, Jostedalen glacier, Jotunheimen national park, UNESCO Urnes stave church, local food, Aurlandsdalen valley, UNESCO fjord cruise, kayaking, glacier center, RIB-tours, hiking trails and other activities and accommodations with a fjord view. Deer farm, bathing facilities, fjord kayaking, family glacier hiking, museums, centers, playland and much more for the kids. The UNESCO Nærøyfjord was in 2004 titled by the National Geographic as “the worlds best unspoiled destination”. The Jotunheimen National park has fantastic hiking areas and Vettifossen - the most beautiful waterfall in Norway. There are marked hiking trails in Aurlandsdalen Valley and many other places around the Sognefjord. Glacier hiking at the Jostedalen glacier – the largest glacier on main land Europe – is an unique experience. There is Luster © VERI Media also three National tourist routes in the area – Sognefjellet, Aurlandsfjellet (“the Snowroad”) and Gaularfjellet, with attractions such as the viewpoints Stegastein and “Utsikten”. Summertime offers classic fjord experiences. In the autumn the air is clear and the fjord is Contents Contact us dressed in beautiful autumn colors – the best time of the year for hiking and cycling. The Autumn and Winter 6 autumns shifts to the “Winter Fjord” with magical fjord light, alpine ski touring, snow shoe Sognefjord 8 walks, ski resorts, cross country skiing, fjord kayaking, RIB-safari, fjord cruises, the Flåm railway Visit Sognefjord AS «Hiking buses»/Getting to and guided tours to the magical blue ice caves under the glacier. The spring breakes in with Fosshaugane Campus and around the Sognefjord 11 flowering and snow powdered mountain tops – maybe the best time of year to visit the Trolladalen 30, NO-6856 Sogndal National Tourist Routes 12 Sognefjord. -
Registration Document
Sparebanken Sogn og Fjordane – 16.05 2012 Registration Document Registration Document 16.05 2012 Prepared according to Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 - Annex XI Sparebanken Sogn og Fjordane – 16.05 2012 Registration Document Important notice The Registration Document is based on sources such as annual reports and publicly available information. This Registration Document has been prepared in cooperation with the Arranger. This is subject to the general business terms of the Arranger. Confidentiality rules and internal rules restricting the exchange of information between different parts of the Arranger may prevent employees of the Arranger who are preparing this presentation from utilizing or being aware of information available to the Arranger and/or affiliated companies and which may be relevant to the recipients' decisions. The Arranger and/or affiliated companies and/or officers, directors and employees may be a market maker or hold a position in any instrument or related instrument discussed in this Registration Document, and may perform or seek to perform financial advisory or banking services related to such instruments. The Arranger's corporate finance department may act as manager or co-manager for this Issuer in private and/or public placement and/or resale not publicly available or commonly known. Copies of this presentation are not being mailed or otherwise distributed or sent in or into or made available in the United States other than on the Issuer’s web page. Persons receiving this document (including custodians, nominees and trustees) must not distribute or send such documents or any related documents in or into the United States. -
Hostagers Born in Norway from 1900-1999
Hostagers Born in Norway from 1900-1999 Marta Andreasdatter Høstaker 1900-1978 Gudveig Høstaker 1937 Fia Høstaker Anne Høstaker 1900-1955 Egil Høstaker 1950 Dorthea Høstaker Nordheim Ingeborg Høstaker 1901- 1989 May Gusland Høstaker 1950 Markus Høstaker Nordheim Ida Ingebrigtsdatter Høstaker - 1902-1993 Arnstein Hauståker 1951 Per-Tomas Høstaker 1976 Anna Andreasdatter Høstaker 1903-2005 Tom Ingar Hauståker 1954-1983 David Høstaker 1978 Olav A. Høstager 1904 Aud Høstaker 1956 Gier Hauståker 1978 Sigurd Andreassen Høstaker - 1904-1925 Norunn Njøs Hauståker 1956 Marie Høstaker 1979 Ingerid A. Høstager 1907 Lillian Høstaker 1956 Terje Høstaker 1980 Sønneve A. Høstager 1908 Grethe Høstaker 1958 Bjørn Høstaker Grinderud Thomas Høstaker 1910-1993 Margunn Oddveig Høstaker 1959 Annette Hauståker 1983 Ingolf Skjerven Hauståker Anne Høstaker 1961 Aslak Høstaker 1987 Hjørdis M. Høstaker 1915-? Roar Høstaker 1962 Frederik Høstaker 1990 Ingolf Hauståker 1922-1996 Øyvind Sunde Høstaker 1962 Mira Høstaker 1990 Kristi Hauståker 1923 Torunn Høstaker 1963 Henrik Hauståker 1990 Bjarne T. Høstaker 1925-2005 Jon Vidar Høstaker 1965 Thomas Høstaker 1992 Kjellaug Høstaker 1929 Åge Høstaker 1968 Frida Høstaker 1993 Borghild (Borgny) Lilly Høstaker 1932 Oddbjorn Skjerven Hauståker Martine Hauståker 1993 Ingrid Høstaker Guri Høstaker Nordheim 1968 Maria Høstaker 1994-? Torfinn Høstaker 1933-1982 Monica Hauståker Andrea Høstaker 1995 Arne Høstaker 1935 Kristian Wolf Hauståker Mats Høstaker 1997 Berit Høstaker 1937 Lusi Høstaker Marta Andreasdatter Høstaker Born: March 29, 1900 Parents: Andres Sjursen Høstaker and Ragnhild Botolfsdatter Married: Berit Høstaker (born Pedersen then Johansen by marriage) (?) Children: Arne Høstaker (b. 1935) 1900 Census: Lists Marta as born in 1900, daughter of Andreas Sjursen Høstaker and Ragnhild Bottlvsdatter. -
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) May Be Further Implemented in Norwegian Law
UNITED NATIONS CERD International Convention on Distr. the Elimination GENERAL of all Forms of CERD/C/430/Add.2 Racial Discrimination 1 October 2002 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION Sixteenth periodic reports of States parties due in 2001 Addendum NORWAY* [18 June 2002] * This document contains the sixteenth periodic report of Norway, due on 5 September 2001. For the fifteenth periodic report of Norway and the summary records of the meetings at which the Committee considered that report, see documents CERD/C/363/Add.3 and CERD/C/SR.1426, 1427 and 1434. The documents enclosed with the report submitted by the Government of Norway may be consulted in the secretariat’s file. GE.02-44675 (E) 031202 CERD/C/430/Add.2 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 - 3 4 I. GENERAL ...................................................................................... 4 - 41 4 A. General legal framework .......................................................... 4 - 10 4 1. The Immigration Act ......................................................... 6 5 2. Appeals Board for Asylum and Immigration Cases ......... 7 - 10 5 B. Demography and standard of living ......................................... 11 - 15 6 1. Demography ...................................................................... 11 - 13 6 2. Standard of living ............................................................. -
JUDGMENT of the COURT 27 November 2017* in Case E-19/16
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 27 November 2017 (Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Working time – Travel to and/or from a location other than a worker’s fixed or habitual place of attendance) In Case E-19/16, REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), in a case pending before it between Thorbjørn Selstad Thue supported by the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) and The Norwegian Government concerning the interpretation of Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, THE COURT, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen, and Ása Ólafsdóttir (ad hoc), Judges, Registrar: Gunnar Selvik, having considered the written observations submitted on behalf of: - Thorbjørn Selstad Thue (“the appellant”), represented by Merete Furesund, advocate; Language of the request: Norwegian. - 2 - - The Norwegian Government (“the respondent”), represented by Siri K. Kristiansen, advocate, Office of the Attorney General (Civil Affairs), acting as Agent; - the Polish Government, represented by Boguslaw Majczyna, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent; - the EFTA Surveillance Authority (“ESA”), represented by Carsten Zatschler and Øyvind Bø, members of its Department of Legal & Executive Affairs, acting as Agents; and - the European Commission (“the Commission”), represented by Michel van Beek, Legal Adviser, and Nicola Yerrell, member of its Legal Service, acting as Agents, having regard to the Report for the Hearing, having heard oral argument of the appellant, represented by Merete Furesund; the respondent, represented by Siri K. -
Annual Report 2014 2 Contents
SUPREME COURT OF NORWAY SUPREME COURT ANNUAL REPORT 2014 2 CONTENTS C O N T E N T S The Supreme Court in 2014 Page 4 Summary of Supreme Court cases and procedure Page 6 The Supreme Court in 1814 and 2014 Page 7 - Establishment and appointment of justices Page 8 - New justices continue the proud tradition Page 11 - The Supreme Court expands Page 12 Preparations for the Supreme Court's bicentenary celebration Page 15 A selection of cases from 2014 Page 16 Dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court Page 22 Conventions on human rights and the Supreme Court Page 24 The EEA agreement and the Supreme Court Page 26 Supreme Court justices Page 31 The Supreme Court's administration Page 34 Court Usher - what is that? Page 40 County Tour 2014 Page 42 Outside the courtroom Page 44 Statistics Page 46 Front page, the Supreme Court's visit to the millennium site at Gulating (Photo: Henrik Tveit) 3 THE SUPREME COURT IN 2014 In 2014 we celebrated the Norwegian Constitutional Bicentenary. The Constitution established the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, with judicial power vested in the Supreme Court and the subordinate courts. The Constitution is the foundation on which Norway, as a democracy based on the rule of law, was built. During its first fifty years as the supreme judicial power, the Supreme Court developed the basic framework of judicial review of the legislative and executive branches. All laws must conform with the limitations that follow from the Constitution. In the event of conflict, the Constitution prevails or the law must be interpreted restrictively, in order to eliminate the conflict. -
Polity and Neighbourhood in Early Medieval Europe the MEDIEVAL COUNTRYSIDE
POLITY AND NEIGHBOURHOOD IN EARLY MEDIEVAL EUROPE THE MEDIEVAL COUNTRYSIDE General Editor Phillipp Schofield,Aberystwyth University Editorial Board Laurent Feller, Université Paris Paul Freedman, Yale University Thomas Lindkvist,Göteborgs universitet Sigrid Hirbodian, Universität Tübingen Peter Hoppenbrouwers, Universiteit Leiden Piotr Gorecki, University of California, Riverside Sandro Carocci, Università degli Studi di Roma Julio Escalona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid Pere Benito i Monclús, Universitat de Lleida Previously published volumes in this series are listed at the back of the book Volume 21 © BREPOLS PUBLISHERS THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE PRINTED FOR PRIVATE USE ONLY. IT MAY NOT BE DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLISHER. POLITY AND NEIGHBOURHOOD IN EARLY MEDIEVAL EUROPE Edited by Julio Escalona, Orri Vésteinsson, and Stuart Brookes British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. © 2019, Brepols Publishers n.v., Turnhout, Belgium All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. D/2019/0095/22 ISBN: 978-2-503-58168-2 e-ISBN: 978-2-503-58169-9 DOI: 10.1484/M.TMC-EB.5.116089 ISSN: 1784-8814 e-ISSN: 2294-8430 Printed in the EU on acid-free paper © BREPOLS PUBLISHERS THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE PRINTED FOR PRIVATE USE ONLY. IT MAY NOT BE -
19/16 Report for the Hearing 09/06/2017 EN
E-19/16-21 REPORT FOR THE HEARING in Case E-19/16 REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), in the case between Thorbjørn Selstad Thue supported by the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) and The Norwegian Government concerning the interpretation of Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time. I Introduction 1. By a letter of 14 December 2016, registered at the Court on the same day, the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett) made a request for an Advisory Opinion in a case pending before it between Thorbjørn Selstad Thue (“the appellant”) and the Norwegian Government (“the respondent”). The Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) is an intervener in the national proceedings in support of the appellant’s case. 2. The case before the referring court concerns an action brought by the appellant, as an employee, against his employer, the respondent, in a dispute concerning the calculation of working hours, more precisely how the appellant must be remunerated for time spent on travel outside ordinary working hours where the destination is a place of work other than the appellant’s usual place of attendance. - 2 - II Legal background EEA law 3. Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. -
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Contents the Chair's Report
KOMMISJONEN FOR GJENOPPTAKELSE AV STRAFFESAKER THE NORWEGIAN CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Contents The Chair's report ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction to the activities and main figures ............................................................................................ 5 The organisation ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Presentation of the Commission's members as at 31 December 2019 ....................................................... 7 Presentation of the Commission's secretariat as at 31 December 2019 ..................................................... 9 The procedure in a review case .................................................................................................................. 10 – without an investigation ........................................................................................................................... 10 The procedure in a review case ................................................................................................................... 11 – with an investigation ................................................................................................................................. 11 The year's activities and results................................................................................................................. -
Annual Report 2017
THE NORWEGIAN CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ANNUAL REPORT2017 1 Contents The Chair's report ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction to the activities and main figures ................................................................................................ 4 The organisation ........................................................................................................................................... 5 The Commission's members 2017 .................................................................................................................. 6 The procedure in a review case – without an investigation ..................................................................................... 9 The procedure in a review case – with an investigation ....................................................................................... 10 The year's activities and results ................................................................................................................... 11 Relevant decisions by the Commission in 2017 ................................................................................................ 15 The Commission's other activities ................................................................................................................... 23 Management and control of the activities ................................................................................................... -
1723 Matrikkel (Land Tax) Jurisdictions For1 Norway
1723 Matrikkel (Land Tax) Jurisdictions For1 Norway Salt Lake City The Family History Library of The Church of Jesus Christ of latter-day Saints. 1998 Revised in 2012 A list of the Jurisdictions: SKIPREIE (SKIPREDE), TINGLANG, ÅTTING, FIERDING AND FOGERI, INDICATING WHICH PARISHES THEY INCLUDED ACCORDING TO THE 1723 MATRIKKEL OF NORWAY (The borders changed through the years as the population grew, therefore this listing only include the parishes which these district encompassed in 1723 and about 25-50 years earlier to about 25 -50 years later. DEFINITIONS: SKIPREIE (Skiprede): An area that was assigned to outfit a ship for military use. Its size was determined according to the number of farms in the area and did not usually include the entire parish. A skipreie may therefore include a number of farms of a given parish while another skipreie may include the remaining farms in the same parish. A skipreie was not confined to a parish border and may include farms in several parishes. As the population grew and there were more people in a given area, the skipreie became smaller and smaller. Today a skipreie (skipsrederi) is just a factory in a city or town where ships are being built. TINGLAG (TINGLAUG): A military enrollment district (meets at the Tingsted). TINGSTED: A place where a court was being held. Åtting: An old administration system used usually in the 1600s and earlier. FJERDING (FIERDING): An old administration jurisdiction which sub-divided a county, district (herred), and sometimes also a skipreide. It was not the only 2 jurisdiction used for the whole country in the middle ages, but it seemed to have been one of importance for the church and state. -
Norwegian Civil Criminal Procedure with Special Reference to Treason Cases
Norwegian Civil Criminal Procedure with Special Reference to Treason Cases I. NORWEGIAN legal process distinguishes sharply between civil and criminal procedure. The organization of the courts as v/ell as the procedural treatment of the case in a civil action differs considerably from that in a criminal action. The rules underlying and regulating NORWEGIAN criminal juris prudence are principally to be found in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1 July 1887 and the Judiciary Act of 13 August 1915, NORWAY, in its accounting with traitors, is relying to the greatest possible degree on customary rules of criminal proce dure, as these appear in the above mentioned enactments, But because of the number of such cases (they are in addition to the ordinary criminal cases) and because of their nature, a certain number of special rules have been laid down to govern procedure in treason cases in the so-called Provisional Act relating to Procedure in Treason Cases, This Act was promulgated in London by the King-in-Council on 16 February 1945, Under normal legislative procedure, provisions of the kind contained in this Act should have been formally adopted, i.e., separately approved by the two divisions of the NORY/EGIAN Storting, the "Odelsting" (3/4 of Parliamentary membership) and the "Lagting" (1/4 of Parliamentary membership), and signed by the King, The validity of this Act, however, must be sought for in the rules relating to constitutionality of emergency legislation All signs point to conclusion that the Act will be upheld as constitutional in its entirety by the Supreme Court.