The Scientific Reserves of Auckland University. I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Scientific Reserves of Auckland University. I TANE 29, 1983 THE SCIENTIFIC RESERVES OF AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY. I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THEIR HISTORY, VEGETATION, CLIMATE AND SOILS by G. M. Thomas and J. Ogden Department of Botany, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland SUMMARY The University reserves at Swanson, Huapai, Oratia, Anawhata and Leigh are described and mapped. An introduction to the history of each reserve is followed by a brief outline of the main sources of information relevant to the climate, geography and soils of the area. Topography and vegetation cover are related, and the latter is described in more detail. INTRODUCTION The University of Auckland owns or administers a number of scientific reserves, four of which are located in the Waitakere Ranges, west of Auckland City (Fig. 1). The reserves at Swanson, Huapai, and Oratia are examples of kauri (Agathis australis) dominated forest in various stages of regeneration from Leptospermum scrub, with small areas of mature forest. At each the forest canopy also contains podocarp and broadleaf components. At Anawhata and Leigh the reserves also include Leptospermum scrub, but are characterised by regenerating coastal forest with pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa) and puriri (Vitex lucens), and a small "ricker" kauri stand at Leigh. In this account the first three reserves (Swanson, Huapai and Oratia) are dealt with in some detail, while the two coastal reserves are briefly covered. This emphasis reflects the amount of ecological research by members of the University staff, Field Club and graduate students which has been carried out in the different areas. Our emphasis is on the vegetation but we have cited the main references dealing with climate and soils. Unreferenced statements are based on the field experience of the authors, or derived from unpublished statements and letters in the files of the University. This paper should be read in conjunction with Ogden (1983 - this volume) which gives more detailed quantitative accounts of the vegetation. SWANSON Swanson State Forest 31 is located 27 km west of Auckland City in the eastern foothills of the Waitakere Ranges near the township of 143 KILOMETRES Fig. 1. Map of the Waitakere Ranges showing the positions of four of the scientific reserves administered by Auckland University. 144 Swanson (Grid reference: Ql 1/497794; NZMS 260 Sheet Qll, Waitakere, 1st Edition, 1979). The property occupies 20. 45 ha on the west side of Tram Valley Road (Fig. 2). This was the first land to become available to the University for use in field studies. It was then Crown land, but was set aside in 1921 for use by the School of Forestry (established in 1924). With the transfer of the school to Canterbury University College in 1931, the control and Fig. 2. Map of the Swanson reserve. 145 management of the forest reverted to the Botany Department of the University on the understanding that an annual report be made to the Forest Service concerning the state of the reserve and its utilisation by the University in the preceding 12 months. Meanwhile, under Professor Corbin's occupation of the Forestry Chair (from 1926) the building which still occupies the site was completed in 1928 from timber donated to the School by local sawmillers. It comprises a large living room, kitchen, and four bunkrooms, each with four bunks. Electricity is not connected. A feature of this building is the handsome fireplace with its splendid mantelpiece cut from an ancient blackened kauri log long-buried in a swamp. The hut is situated at the end of Tram Valley Road, where it is nestled into a stand of kanuka (Leptospermum ericoides). The Swanson Reserve and hut have been the base for much teaching and research in plant ecology and taxonomy. The following theses or project reports deal in total or part with aspects of the vegetation and are available in the Biological Sciences Library of the University of Auckland. Mirams (1951) studied the factors involved in the natural regeneration of kauri. Aspects of kauri growth, particularly those related to light and temperature, were investigated experimentally by Bieleski (1955). A physiological approach was emphasized in the work of nitrogen fixation in forest Utter by Bucha (1975). Germination and early seedling establishment of Leptospermum scrubland were studied by Mohan (1980). West (1980) gives seed collection data from Swanson and compares them with similar data from Tiritiri Matangi Island. She draws conclusions about native forest regeneration generally. Chambers (1952a) presents a detailed quantitative description of the ecology of the bryophytes and lichens at Swanson and some interesting early photographs of the Swanson hut and adjacent area. An artificial key to the vascular plants common in the Swanson area was constructed by Silvester (1963) and is a useful aid to plant identification. CLIMATE The regional climate and weather have been described by Kidson (1950). Rainfall records are kept by the Department of Waterworks of the Auckland City Council and the New Zealand Meteorological Service collects data from Kumeu and Henderson (No. A64861). Mirams (1951) operated a thermohygrograph in the area for 12 months during the period 1948—1950 and collected data on precipitation, temperature and relative humidity for the same years. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The area was initially described by Hochstetter (1864) but Hayward (1976) gives a more detailed account. The Waitakere Ranges are 146 composed essentially of fragmented andesitic volcanic rocks. The Swanson area is classified as Lower Miocene (Pareora Series) Waitemata Subgroup sedimentary rocks. The typical rocks are friable yellowish-brown feldspathic sandstones interbedded with light-grey to bluish-black thinner mudstones often well laminated in character. They contain few determinable fossils other than Foraminifera. The New Zealand Soil Bureau (1968) describes the soils of the Waitakere Ranges as interzonal brown granular clays arising from the underlying andesitic parent material. A more specific description of the soils at the Swanson property is given by Bucha (1975). The topsoils are relatively thin, averaging 10 cm. They are greyish-brown to brown, friable and moderately to strongly granular in structure. The topsoils merge gently into brown to yellowish-brown, firm to compact subsoils with blocky to prismatic structure. The clays of the lower horizons are dense, highly plastic, fairly sticky when wet and very friable when dry. Mirams (1967) gives information on soil pH and moisture content. TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION The landscape at Swanson is dominated by a ridge running from north to south. This ridge is 76. 2 m above sea level at its lowest point and 121. 9 m at its highest. The Swanson Stream flows from north to south at the foot of the slopes and has an average width of 3 m. It is a freshwater stream with a substrate of small boulders and gravel. The ridge and valley sides are covered in kauri-podocarp-hardwood forest typical of the region. The remaining area comprises scrubland (predominantly Leptospermum), abandoned pasture and swamp. The area has been subject to severe disturbance through kauri logging and fire last century and in the early years of this century, and the forest vegetation is largely serai. However, there is no doubt that some of the vegetation survived both axe and fire: a 120 cm diameter kauri on the ridge up which the main track runs has been estimated at 250 years minimum age (from three cores). The vegetation of the area was first described by McKinnon (1930), but his thesis was never deposited in a library, and two maps signed by him appear to be all that remain. The first gives details of topography and the other boundaries of vegetation types and the location of four quadrats within them. Trevarthen (1962) presents a colourful account of the historical background to the vegetation, including logging and fires. The regenerating vegetation was classified on the basis of time since last fire, and maps illustrate the mosaic pattern of communities produced in response to past disturbance and topography. Trevarthen mentions "three distinct types of bush no more than 100 years old - those of the drier ridge tops, those of the valley walls, the mixed bush proper, and 147 finally the facies that fringes the creek or occupies the very deepest and wettest parts of the valleys". This three-fold distinction may still be useful, although recent ordination and classification studies imply a continuous relationship between the different facies. The ridge tops are occupied by stands of young kauri "rickers" with associated kanuka (Leptospermum ericoides) and tanekaha (Phyllocladus trichomanoides). The ricker stands appear to represent a development from areas which regenerated in Leptospermum scrub following the great fires which swept the area in 1840—50. Subsequent less intense ground fires in the ricker have been tentatively dated from fire scars on the kanuka to 1951 and 1955 (Ogden 1983 - this volume). The ridge top facies gives place rapidly to a more diverse assemblage of species on the slopes, with rewarewa (Knightia excelsa) and maire (Nestegis lanceolata) prominent in the canopy and an understorey of tree-ferns, mahoe (Melicytus ramiflorus) and pigeon wood (Hedycarya arborea). The creek side or valley bottom vegetation is characterised by pu tapu ta weta (Carpodetus serratus), nikau palm (Rhopalostylis sapida) some large kanukas, and small shrubby trees (Coprosma australis, Brachyglottis repanda, etc. ). Although all tree ferns are abundant throughout, Cyathea dealbata is most prominent on the ridges, C. medullaris on the slopes and Dicksonia squarrosa in the valley bottoms. The regeneration process at Swanson - the progressive development of Leptospermum and Agathis dominated communities -was given a comprehensive treatment by Mirams (1951, 1957). The physical features of the site were described in detail and some black and white photographs supplement the account of the vegetation. Mirams surveyed kauri size classes in a series of quadrats. A species list based on these quadrats is included in the appendix to his 1951 paper, and includes 71 species of vascular plants (from 31 families) and 25 species of ferns and allied plants.
Recommended publications
  • New Zealand Wine Fair Sa N Francisco 2013 New Zealand Wine Fair Sa N Francisco / May 16 2013
    New Zealand Wine Fair SA N FRANCISCO 2013 New Zealand Wine Fair SA N FRANCISCO / MAY 16 2013 CONTENTS 2 New Zealand Wine Regions New Zealand Winegrowers is delighted to welcome you to 3 New Zealand Wine – A Land Like No Other the New Zealand Wine Fair: San Francisco 2013. 4 What Does ‘Sustainable’ Mean For New Zealand Wine? 5 Production & Export Overview The annual program of marketing and events is conducted 6 Key Varieties by New Zealand Winegrowers in New Zealand and export 7 Varietal & Regional Guide markets. PARTICIPATING WINERIES When you choose New Zealand wine, you can be confident 10 Allan Scott Family Winemakers you have selected a premium, quality product from a 11 Babich Wines beautiful, sophisticated, environmentally conscious land, 12 Coopers Creek Vineyard where the temperate maritime climate, regional diversity 13 Hunter’s Wines and innovative industry techniques encourage highly 14 Jules Taylor Wines distinctive wine styles, appropriate for any occasion. 15 Man O’ War Vineyards 16 Marisco Vineyards For further information on New Zealand wine and to find 17 Matahiwi Estate SEEKING DISTRIBUTION out about the latest developments in the New Zealand wine 18 Matua Valley Wines industry contact: 18 Mondillo Vineyards SEEKING DISTRIBUTION 19 Mt Beautiful Wines 20 Mt Difficulty Wines David Strada 20 Selaks Marketing Manager – USA 21 Mud House Wines Based in San Francisco 22 Nautilus Estate E: [email protected] 23 Pacific Prime Wines – USA (Carrick Wines, Forrest Wines, Lake Chalice Wines, Maimai Vineyards, Seifried Estate) Ranit Librach 24 Pernod Ricard New Zealand (Brancott Estate, Stoneleigh) Promotions Manager – USA 25 Rockburn Wines Based in New York 26 Runnymede Estate E: [email protected] 27 Sacred Hill Vineyards Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Land Use Strategy - North West Kumeū-Huapai, Riverhead, Redhills North
    Spatial Land Use Strategy - North West Kumeū-Huapai, Riverhead, Redhills North Adopted May 2021 Strategic Land Use Framework - North West 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 7 2 Background ................................................................................................................... 9 3 Strategic context.......................................................................................................... 18 4 Consultation ................................................................................................................ 20 5 Spatial Land Use Strategy for Kumeū-Huapai, Riverhead, and Redhills North ........... 23 6 Next steps ................................................................................................................... 43 Appendix 1 – Unitary Plan legend ...................................................................................... 44 Appendix 2 – Response to feedback report on the draft North West Spatial Land Use Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 46 Appendix 3 – Business land needs assessment ................................................................ 47 Appendix 4 – Constraints maps ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kumeu Show NOW 27TH MARCH Circulation Is 10,000 Print Copies and 3371 Opened and Read Email Copies
    kumeu CourierFREE monthly community magazine for Kumeu & districts events and updates Unplanned growth Safer communities Food & beverage Home & garden Property market report Kumeu Show NOW 27TH MARCH Circulation is 10,000 print copies and 3371 opened and read email copies. Editorial contributions are free from cost. Advertising starts at $85 plus gst for a business card size. Contact Geoff Dobson on 027 757 8251 or [email protected] March 2021 What’s inside 3 People & Places 8 North West Country 9 Safer Communities 10 Community News Greetings 12 Muriwai Open Arts The hot topics for March are traffic congestion and development. 14 In brief: Updates Those are key points for a public meeting scheduled for Thursday March 4 by Kumeu Community Action. 16 Property News The meeting should set the tone for local protests which also include the lack of commuter trains, no high school, and 18 Property Statistics unbridled development such as Fletcher Residential gaining Land Information consent for housing in Taupaki (108ha) and Riverhead (20ha). 20 Property Market On top of all that our ward councillor Greg Sayers suggests we could be in for a 16% average rate rise across the area. 22 Central’s Tips He may expand on that at the March 4 meeting which is also expected to feature Kaipara ki Mahurangi MP Chris Penk – 24 Hot Property who is considering declaring a “traffic emergency” to get road improvements - and Labour list MP Marja Lubeck. 26 Home & Garden The need for a bigger venue for that meeting keeps growing – and I’m convinced it will be packed anyway as those are the main gripes I hear about in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents' Survey
    Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents’ Survey - Summary Report Prepared by Buzz Channel and Auckland Transport September 2017 Waitākere Ranges Public Transport Survey – Summary Report Page 1 of 69 Executive summary Auckland Transport and the Waitakere Ranges Local Board have been investigating what Public Transport services may be needed in the Waitakere Ranges area. In March/April 2016, Auckland Transport held a survey for residents of the following areas: French Bay, Henderson Valley, Huia, KareKare, Konini (Kaurilands Rd, Daffodil St, Konini Rd), Laingholm, Oratia, Parau, Paturoa Bay, Piha, South Titirangi, Te Henga (Bethells Beach), Waiatarua, Wood Bay and Woodlands Park. These areas were targeted because they either have no current public transport service, have limited service, or were having services removed when the new West Auckland bus network was implemented in June 2017. Participation In total 839 feedback forms were received. The areas with the highest participation were Huia/Cornwallis/Parau with 116 residents from this area responding, followed by Wood Bay/French Bay/Paturoa Bay/South Titirangi with 108 respondents, and thirdly Piha with 101 respondents. Initial findings In order to determine if there is sufficient demand for any new services, data was grouped by potential routes; i.e. feedback from people who lived in the same area and whose chosen destinations could be accommodated by the same route, was analysed together. In most cases the numbers of people who said they would use each of these potential routes, and how often they said they would use them, was not sufficient to operate a viable bus service. However, two possible scheduled services were identified which could be viable and would warrant further investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • About Rodney District About Rodney District LTCCP 2009 - 2019 Volume 1
    243 SECTION 6: About Rodney District LTCCP 2009 - 2019 About Rodney District Volume 1 About Rodney District Council Rodney District was constituted as part of the 1989 local government reform, which resulted in the amalgamation of the former Helensville Borough with the former Rodney County. Rodney District appears to have taken its name from Cape Rodney, a headland at the north of the curve of Omaha Bay, 2 kilometres north-east of Leigh on the east coast of the district. The cape was named by Captain James Cook, on 24 November 1769, after the British admiral Sir George Bridges Rodney (1719-92). The district covers an area of 2,475 square kilometres and it had a population of 89,200 in 2006 (2006 census – Statistics New Zealand). Rodney District’s neighbours are Waitakere City in the west, North Shore City in the south and Kaipara District in the north. It comprises four wards: Western Ward – the south-western part of the district including the communities of Helensville and Kumeu/Huapai as well as the smaller settlements of Riverhead and Waimauku. Central Ward – the central Rodney area contains the communities of Coatesville and Waitoki. Eastern Ward – the Hibiscus Coast including the Whangaparaoa Peninsula, Orewa and Silverdale. Northern Ward – the northern part of the district, including the Warkworth, Wellsford and Snells Beach/Algies Bay communities and a number of smaller coastal and inland settlements. 244 The purpose of the Rodney District Council is to enable democratic local decision-making to promote the social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing of the district now and for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page
    Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page Please note: As some submitters did not provide their first names they have been ordered in the submissions received list under their title. These submitters are as follows: o Mr Burgess is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr o Mrs Davey is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Dromgool is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Peters is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mr Ripley is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr We apologise for any confusion the above ordering of submissions may have caused. If your submission is not displayed here, contains incorrect information or is missing some parts, please email us on [email protected] or contact Mathew Stewart on (09) 447 4831 Sub # Submitter Page 851 J Dromgool 13 870 Jacob Phillips 13 15 Jacob Samuel 13 178 Jacqueline Anne Church 13 685 Jacqui Fisher 13 100 James Houston 13 854 James Lockhart 13 302 Jamie Revell 13 361 Jan Heijs 14 372 Jane Blow 14 309 Jane Briant-Turner 14 482 Janet Hunter 14 662 Janet Pates 14 656 Janie Flavell 14 634 Jarrod Ford (NB: we apologise if this name is incorrect, we were 14 unable to clearly decipher the writing) 718 Jason Lafaele 14 605 Jaydene Haku 15 746 Jeanette Collie 15 149 Jeanette Valerie Cooper 15 177 Jennifer Collett 15 681 Jennifer Olson 15 818 Jennifer Preston 15 832 Jenny TeWake 15 1 Sub # Submitter Page 373 Jeremy Lees-Green 15 85 Jesse McKenzie 16 843 Jessica Currie
    [Show full text]
  • President's Report New Committee Member!
    WRP S NEWS Issue 17 8 Newsletter of The Waitakere Ranges Protection Society Inc. August 2018 AGM Edition The Waitakere Ranges Protection Society Inc. is a PO Box 15668, New Lynn, Auckland 0640 Sregistered charitable entity in terms of the Email: [email protected] Charities Act 2005. Registration No. CC46103 Website: www.waitakereranges.org.nz facebook.com/TheWRPS President’s Report As I write this report today, it is yet again cold and raining John’s family and friends. His obituary can be read in this in the ranges, and spring seems distant. However, looking newsletter. across the valley I observe that the native trees have new growth and the forest is taking on a brighter green hue. And our thoughts are with Trixie and Bruce Harvey and their family following Trixie’s cancer diagnosis last month. The Society continues our appeal in the environment court regarding the reinstatement of prohibited activity in some John Edgar ONZM areas of the ranges. While this has been a long campaign, President beginning with the Unitary Plan hearings in 2014 and then the High Court appeal in 2016, we are hopeful of a good outcome that we will be able to report on in our next New Committee Member! newsletter. Our Heritage Act history project progresses well, if a little slower than we had anticipated, as acquiring the historic images in high resolution scans from library and museum archives and writing the captions takes time. We are very appreciative of the work that the publisher, Oratia Media, have done to date and their continued patience with this final part of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Titirangi West Including Oratia, Green Bay, Wood Bay, French Bay, Konini, Waiatarua, Parau, Kaurilands, Huia, Cornwallis and Laingholm
    Titirangi West including Oratia, Green Bay, Wood Bay, French Bay, Konini, Waiatarua, Parau, Kaurilands, Huia, Cornwallis and Laingholm he wooded suburb of Titirangi is inextricably linked with certain enduring images: Ttree-huggers, potters in home-spun jumpers, old Rovers in British-racing green with Greenpeace stickers, disappearing up bush-lined driveways. Trees are to Titirangi as coffee is to Ponsonby. Mention the place and most people think “bush”, and the 1970s vintage timber houses tucked out of sight, and often out of sun, amongst the trees. Many of Titirangi’s homes sit high above the Manukau Harbour with glorious sea views and distant city vistas. The suburb’s little village emphasises the feeling that you’re far from the madding crowd. Just five minutes up the road Oratia, with its big flat sections and views back towards the city, is one of the best-kept secrets of these parts. :DLWDNHUH Population Profile 6ZDQVRQ 5DQXL (GPRQWRQ Population 25,071 % Aged Under 15 Years 22.23 % Aged Over 65 Years 10.23 3DOP+HLJKWV *OHQGHQH % European 77.33 .HOVWRQ % Maori 7.24 % Pacific Peoples 4.45 2UDWLD 2UDWLD % Asian 5.48 .DXULODQGV *OHQ(GHQ6RXWK :DLDWDUXD *UHHQ%D\ Who Lives There? 7LWLUDQJL :RRG%D\ Traditionally, Titirangi has appealed to 0DFNLHV5HVW 0DFNLHV5HVW )UHQFK%D\ the artistically inclined and to bush-lovers. Alternative lifestylers and commuting /DLQJKROP professionals and every philosophy in between is represented here today. There’s 3DUDX continuing interest from British and South African migrants and even holidaymakers +XLD who become so smitten with the bush, &RUQZDOOLV the village and its laidback lifestyle that they move here.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Growth Delivering Transport Networks
    Supporting Growth Delivering transport networks SUMMARY Supporting Growth – Delivering Transport Networks | Summary 3 The preferred network KEY AUCKLAND IS GROWING FAST WITH AN ADDITIONAL July 2016 Future Urban Zone (Potential Business) 1 July 2016 Future Urban Zone 700,000 TO 1 MILLION PEOPLE EXPECTED TO CALL (Potential Residential & Other Urban Uses) Live Zoned AUCKLAND HOME OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS, REQUIRING Special Purpose Future Urban Zone added as a result of Council decisions on the Unitary Plan ABOUT 400,000 NEW HOMES AND 277,000 JOBS. Special Housing Area (within growth areas) Existing Urban Area State Highway As New Zealand’s largest city, Auckland is Government to improve alignment on a long-term Where will this growth go? New public transport corridor home to about a third of the nation’s population strategic approach to transport in Auckland). It has Improved road corridor and continues to be the country’s fastest also worked closely the “three waters” providers New road corridor growing region. (water supply, stormwater, wastewater) to ensure Rural, coastal Future Ferry services it is aligned with the wider regional plans being and country growth areas Rail corridor improvements While most of Auckland’s growth will take place developed for the city. living outside 2010 Rail corridor investigations within the existing urban areas, around 15,000 metropolitan Safety improvements hectares of greenfield (mainly rural) land has been The programme supports the council’s Future identified in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative Urban Land Supply Strategy which sets the order urban limit in part). This includes areas zoned ‘future urban’ in which land is supplied for development in (rural land zoned for future urban development), future growth areas to house Auckland’s growing 15% 25% as well rural land that has been ‘live zoned’ (zoned population as infrastructure becomes available.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better Kumeu-Huapai Applying Neighbourhood Sustainability Tools in Kumeu and Huapai
    Building a better Kumeu-Huapai Applying neighbourhood sustainability tools in Kumeu and Huapai Contents Chairperson’s message 4 Executive summary 5 Method 7 - Observational Tool 8 - Resident Survey 9 Results 10 - Observational Tool 10 - Resident Survey 11 - What people like 12 - What people dislike 13 Community discussions 14 Aspirations for the short term – looking forward 12 months 15 What people would like to be involved with 16 Conclusion 17 References 18 BUILDING A BETTER KUMEU-HUAPAI | 3 Message from the chairperson In 2015, the Rodney Local Board commissioned I would like to thank you personally for your Beacon Pathway to find out what Kumeu and Huapai contribution. We are continuing the journey to put residents liked about the area and what things needed in place detailed planning so that this area can be to change. Our towns, villages and neighbourhoods what you, as a resident, want. We won’t be able to do are being affected by a growing demand for new everything at once but we do want to develop a plan places for people to live. so we can work alongside you. This information will be used to help the Rodney Noho ora mai, Local Board work out what must happen to improve Brenda Steele our local neighbourhoods and the wider area. Rodney Local Board Chairperson As we told you last year, this is one of the first steps to progress planning for this area. May 2016 We asked you to complete a questionnaire, we held public meetings and Beacon Pathway undertook an overall assessment of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumeū-Huapai Centre Plan a Community-Led Plan September 2017 © 2017 Auckland Council Plans & Places; Planning North, West and Islands
    TE MAHERE MŌ TE POKAPŪ O KUMEŪ KI HUAPAI Kumeū-Huapai Centre Plan A community-led plan September 2017 © 2017 Auckland Council Plans & Places; Planning North, West and Islands 2 | KUMEŪ-HUAPAI CENTRE PLAN Ngā upoko kōrero Contents Mihi ............................................................................................................. 4 Local board foreword ........................................................................ 5 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 7 2 Developing the centre plan .................................................. 9 3 How the centre plan fits in – strategic context .......... 13 4 Local context of Kumeū-Huapai ................................. 19 5 Planning for the future – vision and key ideas ....... 27 6 Kumeū-Huapai now and in the future ................. 45 Reference material ....................................................... 47 KUMEŪ-HUAPAI CENTRE PLAN | 3 Mihi “Tērā ka kūmea “That which is drawn I te otinga o te haere, kia ū mā te tōanga roa, and secured through effort and endurance, ki te hunga e kore e tūohu ngā ūpoko e hua ai ko te pai anake.” gives reward of none else, but success.” nā te nui o te mahi te maringa nui. Ki a rātou anake ngā whakaaweawe E koutou e toko ake nei i runga Those of you who travel over kei tua i ngā taumata o te moana. i ngā tapuwae o ngā wheinga o tuawhakarere, the footprints of our forebears, kia tūpato e ahu ake ana koutou tread lightly, you are passing “Tērā ka kūmea mā runga i ngā papa whenua over the green fields kia ū mā te tōanga roa, i whakatōkia ai ō rātou tūmanako that were planted with their dreams e hua ai ko te pai anake.” me ō rātou moemoeā. and aspirations. Mehemea he manene pahure noa koe, If you are just passing by nau mai haere, welcome and farewell, waihoa noa mai ko te kakara o tō rongo.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Modification 88
    Decision following the hearing of a Concurrent Application for Variation to the Proposed Unitary Plan, a Resource Consent under the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 SUBJECT: An application for a variation to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan under section 61 of the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 and application for a qualifying development under section 25 of the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 by Arborfield Group Holdings Limited at 105 Oraha Road, Huapai (Lot 1 DP 311880), Lot 2 DP 452240, Burns Lane, Huapai and 59 Burns Lane, Huapai (Lot 16 DP 56200), held on 16 and 17 December 2015, commencing at 9.30am. CONSENT, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 61 AND 25 OF THE HOUSING ACCORDS AND SPECIAL HOUSING AREAS ACT 2013, IS GRANTED. THE FULL DECISION IS SET OUT BELOW Hearing Panel: The Applications were heard by Hearings Commissioners consisting of: Barry Kaye (Chairperson) Richard Blakey Mark Farnsworth Brenda Brady Council Officers: Euan Williams Lead Project Planner, (Qualifying Qualifying Developments Development) Jarette Wickham (Plan Principal Planner SHA Variation) Masterplanning Development Project Office Richard Davison Urban Designer Mark Iszard Stormwater Engineer Katja King-Borrero Stormwater Mitra Prasad Auckland Transport Aut Karndacharuk Auckland Transport Stuart Bracey Auckland Transport Brian Waddell Transport Planner Libby McKinnel Sediment Control Rue Statham Ecology Maylene Barrett Parks Paulette Gagamoe Hearings Advisor – Democracy Services 1 APPEARANCES: For the applicant:
    [Show full text]