Efficient and Accurate Modeling of Electrically Large Dielectric Lens

Efficient and Accurate Modeling of Electrically Large Dielectric Lens Antennas using Full-Wave Analysis Stig B. Sørensen1, Min Zhou1, Peter Meincke1, Niall Tynan2, and Marcin L. Gradziel2 1TICRA, Copenhagen, Denmark, [email protected] 2National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland, [email protected] Abstract—Two efficient analysis methods for the accurate mod- on the front surface of the lens, eling of electrically large dielectric lens antennas are presented. The first method is based on Double Physical Optics (PO), which ~ ~ ~ ~ takes into account an additional set of reflections within the lens, Jsf =n ^ × H; Msf = −n^ × E (1) whereas the conventional PO method only accounts for one set. The second method relies on a higher-order Body of Revolution ~ ~ Method of Moments and is capable of providing a full-wave where n^ is the outward normal unit vector, and H, E denote solution of a 100-wavelength dielectric lens antenna within 2 the total magnetic and electric fields, respectively. At any point minutes on a laptop computer. on the front surface the equivalent currents can be computed Index Terms—modeling, dielectric lens, higher-order MoM using the Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients for plane-wave incidence on a infinite planar dielectric interface. The direction of incidence is determined by the Poynting I. INTRODUCTION vector such that the locally reflected and transmitted field can Dielectric lens antennas possess several advantages com- be computed [4]. When these fields are known the equivalent pared to reflector antennas, e.g., enhanced wide-scan capabil- surface current densities follow directly from (1). By letting ~ ~ ity, no blockage, ease of fabrication due to their rotational Jsf , Msf radiate in the dielectric lens material, the incident symmetry, greater flexibility, etc. [1]. Dielectric lenses have field on the back surface of the lens is computed, so that a ~ ~ been suggested as an alternative solution to an offset dual set of equivalent surface current densities Jsb, Msb on this reflector system for scientific space applications [2]. Also, surface is found. Again, the Poynting vector and the Fresnel they are easy to design using Geometrical Optics (GO) or reflection and transmission coefficients are used. The currents Physical Optics (PO). However, they are challenging from on the back surface are subsequently used to calculate a new an EM modeling point of view, since they are electrically set of currents on the front surface, from which a new set of large and often coated with matching layers. High-frequency currents is determined on the back. The radiation from the methods, e.g. conventional PO, do not accurately account for currents constitutes the field scattered by the lens. Hence, the the reflections inside the lens. One way to alleviate this is by difference between conventional PO and Double PO is that the applying a Double PO approach where an additional set of latter method includes an additional set of reflections within reflections within the lens is taken into account. To check the the lens. validity of such an approach, one needs to employ full-wave analysis tools which includes multiple interactions of all orders within the lens. However, due to the large electrical size, the B. Higher-Order Body of Revolution Method of Moments typical computation time using existing commercial tools is in terms of several hours. The BoR-MoM has been formulated previously in several In this paper, the Double PO method is described and works, e.g., [5], [6]. These works employed triangular basis validated by full-wave analysis based on the Body of Revolu- functions on linear curve segments, requiring a relatively large tion Method of Moments (BoR-MoM), which is commercially number of unknowns to achieve convergence. We employ the available in TICRA’s software package GRASP [3]. The two same integral equation as in previous works, e.g., that of methods are applied to large dielectric lens antennas and [6], but the equation is discretized with higher-order basis validated by comparison with measurements. functions and curvilinear segments. The electric and magnetic surface current densities, J~s and M~ s, on each curve segment II. ANALYSIS METHODS are expanded as A. Double Physical Optics M φ ~ X ~ Initially, the incident field due to the feed is used to find X = Xm; (2) the equivalent electric and magnetic surface current densities m=0 where X~ = J~s; M~ s and The relative permittivity varies in the frequency range and was measured to be approximately r = 2:3 at 100 GHz. Hence, N t X the diameter of the lens is 145λ at 100 GHz, where λ is the X~ = at;e B~ t;e + at;o B~ t;o m mn mn mn mn wavelength of the dielectric. The centre of the lens is located n=0 at z = 410:5 mm. The feed is a corrugated horn. N t−1 X In Section III-A the feed is located on the axis of symmetry, + aφ,e B~ φ,e + aφ,o B~ φ,o: (3) mn mn mn mn whereas an offset feed is considered in Section III-B. n=0 t;e t;o φ,e φ,o Herein, amn, amn, amn, and amn are unknown coefficients, N t is the polynomial expansion order along the generatrix, φ ~ t;e ~ t;o M is the highest azimuthal mode index, and Bmn, Bmn, ~ φ,e ~ φ,o Bmn, and Bmn are t- and φ-directed vector basis function, defined as t; e ~a cos mφ ~ (o) t Bmn (t; φ) = Pen(t) ; (4a) Js(t; φ) sin mφ e φ,(o) ~aφ cos mφ B~ mn (t; φ) = Pn(t) : (4b) Js(t; φ) sin mφ Fig. 1. The dielectric lens with on-axis illumination. Here, ~at = @~r=@t, ~aφ = @~r=@φ, are the covariant unitary vectors, and Js(t; φ) = j~at × ~aφj. In (4b) the polynomials Pn(t) along the direction transverse to the current flow are the A. On-axis Illumination Legendre polynomials due to their orthogonality properties. The corrugated horn aperture is at z = 0 mm. The ampli- In the direction along the current flow in (4a), the modified tudes of the co- and cx-polar components of the radiated field Legendre polynomials at 100 GHz, calculated in the aperture plane at z = 510 mm, 8 1 − t; n = 0 are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. The conventional < PO, Double PO, and BoR-MoM are used to calculate the Pen(t) = 1 + t; n = 1 (5) radiation patterns. Since the feed is a corrugated horn located : Pn(t) − Pn−2(t); n ≥ 2 at the axis of symmetry, only one azimuthal mode is needed are used. The two lowest order polynomials can be matched in the BoR-MoM analysis. with the corresponding functions on the neighbouring seg- It is seen that the overall agreement between the three ments, or alternatively, they can be left out at external nodes. methods for the co-polar component is good. However, there t The expansion order along the generatrix, N , is adapted are ripples in the pattern – arising from the reflections within to the electrical length of each segment, which is usually in the lens – which are only predicted by BoR-MoM and Double the order of 2λ, λ being the wavelength of the scatterer. The PO. Furthermore, it is also observed that the cx-polar radiation φ highest azimuthal mode index, M , is determined automati- obtained by conventional PO deviates somewhat from the cally from the Fourier series expansion of the incident field. solutions found using Double PO and BoR-MoM. When higher-order basis functions and curved segments The computation time on a 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7 laptop is are used, the number of unknowns is reduced by a factor approximately 30 s, 10 min, and 1.5 min for PO, Double PO, of 4 and drops to about 3-4 per wavelength. Consequently, and BoR-MoM, respectively. Despite BoR-MoM being a full- even structures larger than several hundred wavelengths can wave method, the computation time is very low and much be handled with modest computer resources. lower compared to that of Double PO. The solutions for different azimuthal modes do not couple The simulated radiation pattern at 100 GHz is compared t;e t;o and therefore, the MoM problem for the unknowns amn, amn, with measurements in Figure 4. There is excellent agreement φ,e φ,o φ amn, and amn decouples into M + 1 independent smaller between simulations and measurements. The ripples predicted MoM problems. Hence, to obtain the solution to the unknown by the BoR-MoM analysis cannot be captured by the mea- surface current densities, a MoM problem – based on the surements due to insufficient measurement points. expansion (3) – is solved for each azimuthal index, and the resulting solutions are summed according to (2). B. Offset Illumination Figure 5 depicts the configuration involving the offset illu- III. APPLICATION EXAMPLE mination. The lens and feed are the same as in the previously The methods described above are applied to the type B lens considered case, but the lens is rotated 10 degrees around from [2]. This type B lens transforms rays from a point source its center in the xz-plane. Consequently, the feed is located into a planar wavefront, as shown in Figure 1. The lens has 410:5 mm· sin 10◦=71.3 mm from the symmetry axis of the a diameter of 286 mm and is tested in the frequency range lens, corresponding to 23:8λ0. For this offset, 58 azimuthal from 75 to 150 GHz. Thus, the dimension of the lens spans modes (M φ = 57) are needed in the BoR-MoM analysis, and from 72−143 λ0, with λ0 being the free-space wavelength.

Load more