Responses to Humanist Manifesto III
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UU Humanist Responses to Humanist Manifesto III by Members of the DuPage Humanists Where I work, I helped found a Humanist club … I can’t say that the club has converted anybody, but for some it has given them a name for what they already believed. And the manifestos give it a structure and definition. I didn’t come to Humanism that way, however … I didn’t just say: “that’s what I believe.” For me it was more a matter of: “Am I allowed to believe that? Dare I believe that this world is all there is? Will that be enough?” After many discussions and much reading, I’ve answered those questions, “Yes.” And because it rings so true to me, the real answer is that I must believe it. Between 1999 and 2002, the American Humanist Association drafted and circulated widely for review, an update of the Humanist Manifesto. Both previous versions (1933 and 1973), were brave and inevitably flawed attempts to state in terms both broad and specific, the widest possible view of humanist thought at the time. The latest version was released to the public in April of 2003, signed by over one hundred public figures, including twenty-one Nobel Prize winners; it currently has nearly 2,000 endorsers, including several hundred who signed on at the AHA/HUUmanists table at General Assembly. On August 3 of this year, a dozen members of the DuPage Humanists presented a Sunday service to the DuPage UU Church, consisting of musical and spoken responses to HM III. Portions of eight of those presentations are offered here, close to the order in which they were presented. The range is from thoughtful to biographical to simply impassioned; they are neither learned critiques nor formally argued, but rather personal observations inspired by that document. ************************ Humanism and Its Aspirations Humanist Manifesto III, as successor to the Humanist Manifesto of 1933 Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without supernaturalism, affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity. The lifestance of Humanism—guided by reason, inspired by compassion, and informed by experience—encourages us to live life well and fully. It evolved through the ages and continues to develop through the efforts of thoughtful people who recognize that values and ideals, however carefully wrought, are subject to change as our knowledge and understandings advance. This document is part of an ongoing effort to manifest in clear and positive terms the conceptual boundaries of Humanism, not what we must believe but a consensus of what we do believe. It is in this sense that we affirm the following: Knowledge of the world is derived by observation, experimentation, and rational analysis. Humanists find that science is the best method for determining this knowledge as well as for solving problems and developing beneficial technologies. We also recognize the value of new departures in thought, the arts, and inner experience—each subject to analysis by critical intelligence. Humans are an integral part of nature, the result of unguided evolutionary change. Humanists recognize nature as self-existing. We accept our life as all and enough, distinguishing things as they are from things as we might wish or imagine them to be. We welcome the challenges of the future, and are drawn to and undaunted by the yet to be known. Ethical values are derived from human need and interest as tested by experience. Humanists ground values in human welfare shaped by human circumstances, interests, and concerns and extended to the global ecosystem and beyond. We are committed to treating each person as having inherent worth and dignity, and to making informed choices in a context of freedom consonant with responsibility. Life’s fulfillment emerges from individual participation in the service of humane ideals. We aim for our fullest possible development and animate our lives with a deep sense of purpose, finding wonder and awe in the joys and beauties of human existence, its challenges and tragedies, and even in the inevitability and finality of death. Humanists rely on the rich heritage of human culture and the lifestance of Humanism to provide comfort in times of want and encouragement in times of plenty. Humans are social by nature and find meaning in relationships. Humanists long for and strive toward a world of mutual care and concern, free of cruelty and its consequences, where differences are resolved cooperatively without resorting to violence. The joining of individuality with interdependence enriches our lives, encourages us to enrich the lives of others, and inspires hope of attaining peace, justice, and opportunity for all. Working to benefit society maximizes individual happiness. Progressive cultures have worked to free humanity from the brutalities of mere survival and to reduce suffering, improve society, and develop global community. We seek to minimize the inequities of circumstance and ability, and we support a just distribution of nature’s resources and the fruits of human effort so that as many as possible can enjoy a good life. Humanists are concerned for the well being of all, are committed to diversity, and respect those of differing yet humane views. We work to uphold the equal enjoyment of human rights and civil liberties in an open, secular society and maintain it is a civic duty to participate in the democratic process and a planetary duty to protect nature’s integrity, diversity, and beauty in a secure, sustainable manner. Thus engaged in the flow of life, we aspire to this vision with the informed conviction that humanity has the ability to progress toward its highest ideals. The responsibility for our lives and the kind of world in which we live is ours and ours alone. * Humanist Manifesto is a trademark of the American Humanist Association—© 2003 American Humanist Association ************************** “Knowing our History” by Mike Werner Thirty years ago I sat in the Charlotte, NC Unitarian church and heard a presentation on Humanist Manifesto I and II, which was a life-changing experience for me. Despite some outdated language, I found that a document written in 1933 in one short page captured my own whole integrative world view, but more clearly and eloquently than I was capable of expressing. It was signed by a group of some of the greatest philosophers and liberal clergy, half of whom were Unitarian ministers, who thought that our knowledge had progressed to a point that the old religious interpretations of the world no longer made sense in light of rational, scientific knowledge, and who formulated a new lifestance, world view or religion, not as fixed dogma, but as the best thought of the day. Rejecting supernaturalism and embracing Naturalism, which proclaimed this world is all and enough, seemed to be the only rational option, considering the evidence. This Manifesto was only an expression of the long evolving tradition of humanism whereby human values were seen coming not from the supernatural, but emergent from human needs and desires, where knowledge comes not from arbitrary faith and revelation, but the best that reason and science can offer. I spent years in my religious quest trying to understand the big questions of who are we, what do we know, how shall we live, why be moral, and where do we find meaning, but with little help. It was a lonely search held together only with patience and a fierce loyalty to truth. When I discovered Humanist literature, I realized others had also dared to penetrate the big questions, and had done so with great success over the course of the centuries. It has led me to deeper knowledge, deeper insights, deeper commitments to people and deeper love of nature and humanity. The DuPage UU church was in fact founded as a Humanist church, and is reflected in our constitution. Humanism is an evolving tradition without set answers. It requires us to think for ourselves and not accept the easy answer. Humanist Manifesto III just published represents the latest in that tradition in putting forth the best we affirm, not that we all agree on these things, but as a consensus document to at least help others know what a non-theistic life might look like. Signed by nineteen Nobel laureates and thousands of others, it lets all know that our lives can be affirmed and illuminated in a philosophy of life that embraces the world in a dance of love and enchantment. If there is one mark of Humanism it is of courage: the courage to question, the courage to challenge one’s beliefs, the courage to live a life of challenging ethical ideals, the courage to live fully and lovingly. That is what attracted me then and today as we celebrate the new Humanist Manifesto III, only the latest, and surely not the last, affirmation of a progressive philosophy, willing to grow and adapt with the best that heart and mind, reason and compassion can offer. *********************** “Humanist Manifesto III is a Love Letter to Humanity” by Jack Sechrest How do Humanists deal with “love” since it is not mentioned in Humanist Manifesto III? HM III is a love letter, especially to those who are interested in reading it. It lacks the word “love,” but that is good. “Love” does not then become a shibboleth. Love does not become an icon to be worn or carried about. Rather, love is a quality of relationships that shows concern for and affirmation of others. The demands upon us of HM III are great. It requires that we lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity.