DOCSLIB.ORG

Increases by State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Increases by State Increases by State ****The following consists of information gathered from multiple online reputable legal and HR resources for which Vensure Employer Services assumes no responsibility for its accuracy, as ordinances may change before July 1st from the date of this list and the other includes tabs. To assist with this, official links to every state or city website have been included so that you can personally confirm the rates, in case they have been changed JULIY 2020 MINIMUM WAGE UPDATES EFFECTIVE PREVIOUS 2020 WAGE OFFICIAL INTERNET SITES FOR MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE/CITY NOTES / COMMENTS / DESCRIPTION DATE WAGE RATE RATE STATE AND/OR CITY California (Alameda) https://www.alamedaca.gov/Departments/Economic- 7/1/2020 $13.50 $15.00 Development-and-Community-Services/Minimum-Wage California (Berkeley) 7/1/2020 $15.59 $16.07 https://www.cityofberkeley.info/MWO/ California: Emeryville (56 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $16.30 $16.84 http://www.ci.emeryville.ca.us/1024/Minimum-Wage- Ordinance California: Emeryville (55 or fewer employees) 7/1/2020 $16.00 $16.84 http://www.ci.emeryville.ca.us/1024/Minimum-Wage- Ordinance California: Fremont (26 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $13.50 $15.00 https://www.fremont.gov/3328/Minimum-Wage Employers with 25 or less employees will remain at the state wage. California:Los Angeles (26 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $14.25 $15.00 https://wagesla.lacity.org/ California:Los Angeles (25 or fewer employees) 7/1/2020 $13.25 $14.25 https://wagesla.lacity.org/ California: Los Angeles County (Unincorporated - 26 http://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/dca/243396_HonestWorkF 7/1/2020 $14.25 $15.00 or more employees) airPayPosterEnglish.pdf California: Los Angeles County (Unincorporated - 25 http://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/dca/243396_HonestWorkF 7/1/2020 $13.25 $14.25 or fewer employees) airPayPosterEnglish.pdf California: Malibu (26 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $14.25 $15.00 https://www.malibucity.org/DocumentCenter/View/13288/ Malibu-Minimum-Wage-poster?bidId= California: Malibu (25 or fewer employees) 7/1/2020 $13.25 $14.25 https://www.malibucity.org/DocumentCenter/View/13288/ Malibu-Minimum-Wage-poster?bidId= California: Milpitas 7/1/2020 $15.00 $15.40 http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/milpitas/departments/econo mic-development/minimum-wage/ California: Novato (100 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $14.00 $15.00 California: Novato (26 to 99 employees) 7/1/2020 $13.00 $14.00 https://www.novato.org/home/showdocument?id=30096 California: Novato (1 to 25 employees) 7/1/2020 $12.00 $13.00 California: Pasadena (26 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $14.25 $15.00 https://ww5.cityofpasadena.net/planning/code- compliance/minimum-wage-information/ California: Pasadena (25 or fewer employees) 7/1/2020 $13.25 $14.25 https://ww5.cityofpasadena.net/planning/code- compliance/minimum-wage-information/ California: Deferral - Pasadena (26 or more 7/1/2020 N/A TBD https://ww5.cityofpasadena.net/planning/code- https://ww5.cityofpasadena.net/planning/w employees) compliance/minimum-wage-information/ p- content/uploads/sites/56/2017/07/Minimum- Wage-Fact- Sheet.pdf California: Deferral - Pasadena (25 or fewer 7/1/2020 N/A TBD https://ww5.cityofpasadena.net/planning/code- https://ww5.cityofpasadena.net/planning/w employees) compliance/minimum-wage-information/ p- content/uploads/sites/56/2017/07/Minimum- Wage-Fact- Sheet.pdf Find Address: http://pasgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Inform California: San Francisco (Generally) 7/1/2020 $15.59 $16.07 https://sfgov.org/olse/minimum-wage-ordinance-mwo ationLookup/index.html?appid=776e95bd9 a884b50a39c7a3e48 4781e8 Find Address: California: San Francisco (Government-Supported https://sfgov.org/olse/historical-wage-rates-definition- http://pasgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Inform 7/1/2020 $13.79 $14.22 Employee) government-supported-employee ationLookup/index.html?appid=776e95bd9 a884b50a39c7a3e48 4781e8 California: San Leandro 7/1/2020 $14.00 $15.00 http://sanleandro.org/depts/cityhall/mwo.asp California: Santa Monica (26 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $14.25 $15.00 https://beta.smgov.net/strategic-goals/inclusive-diverse- community/minimum-wage-ordinance California: Santa Monica (25 or fewer employees) 7/1/2020 $13.25 $14.25 https://beta.smgov.net/strategic-goals/inclusive-diverse- community/minimum-wage-ordinance California: Santa Monica (Hotels) 7/1/2020 $16.63 $17.13 https://bca.lacity.org/eeo_hotel Same as LA Hotels California: Santa Rosa (26 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $13.00 $15.00 https://srcity.org/3164/15-Minimum-Wage California: Santa Rosa (25 or fewer employees) 7/1/2020 $12.00 $14.00 https://srcity.org/3164/15-Minimum-Wage District of Columbia 7/1/2020 $14.00 $15.00 http://lims.dccouncil.us/Download/35660/B21-0712- SignedAct.pdf Illinois: Chicago (21 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $13.00 $14.00 https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/bacp/OS https://www.gocgo.com/blog/illinois- L/20200518mwandpslfinal51820.pdf minimum-wage Illinois: Chicago (4 to 20 employees) 7/1/2020 $13.00 $13.50 https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/bacp/OS https://www.gocgo.com/blog/illinois- L/20200518mwandpslfinal51820.pdf minimum-wage Illinois: Cook County 7/1/2020 $12.00 $13.00 https://www.cookcountyil.gov/sites/default/files/service/mo https://www.gocgo.com/blog/illinois- del-minimum-wage-notice-employees-workplace- minimum-wage poster_0.pdf Maine: Portland 7/1/2020 $11.11 $12.00 https://www.portlandmaine.gov/1671/Minimum-Wage Maryland: Montgomery County (51 or more 7/1/2020 $13.00 $14.00 https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/humanrights/Reso https://www.dllr.state.md.us/forms/esstipall employees) urces/Files/Minimum_Wage_Transition_Table.pdf owinfo.pdf; https://www.dllr.state.md.us/labor/wages/ minimumwagelawmont.pdf Maryland: Montgomery County (11-50 employees/11 https://www.dllr.state.md.us/forms/esstipall or more employees & either a 501 (c ) (3) or certain https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/humanrights/Reso owinfo.pdf; 7/1/2020 $12.50 $13.25 home health or community based services urces/Files/Minimum_Wage_Transition_Table.pdf https://www.dllr.state.md.us/labor/wages/ providers/10 or fewer employees) minimumwagelawmont.pdf Minnesota: Minneapolis (101 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $12.25 $13.25 http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/news/WCMSP-207170 Minnesota: Minneapolis (100 or fewer employees) 7/1/2020 $11.00 $11.75 http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/news/WCMSP-207170 http://labor.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/labornvg Nevada (No Health Benefits) 7/1/2020 $8.25 $9.00 http://labor.nv.gov/Wages/Minimum_Wage_Bulletins/ ov/content/Employer/2020%20Annual%20 Minimum%20Wage%2 0Bulletin.pdf http://labor.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/labornvg Nevada (Health Benefits Offeres) 7/1/2020 $7.25 $8.00 http://labor.nv.gov/Wages/Minimum_Wage_Bulletins/ ov/content/Employer/2020%20Annual%20 Minimum%20Wage%2 0Bulletin.pdf New Jersey (6 or more employees) 7/1/2020 $10.00 $11.00 https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2018/Bills/A0500/15_R1.PDF Oregon (Urban) 7/1/2020 $12.50 $13.25 https://www.oregon.gov/boli/whd/omw/pages/minimum- https://www.oregonmetro.gov/library/urba wage-rate-summary.aspx n-growth-boundary/lookup; https://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/default /files/2016/10/21/UGBCurrent.pdf Oregon (General 7/1/2020 $11.25 $12.00 https://www.oregon.gov/boli/whd/omw/pages/minimum- wage-rate-summary.aspx Oregon (Nonurban) 7/1/2020 $11.00 $11.50 https://www.oregon.gov/boli/whd/omw/pages/minimum- wage-rate-summary.aspx EFFECTIVE PREVIOUS 2020 CREDIT OFFICIAL INTERNET SITES FOR MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE/CITY NOTES / COMMENTS / DESCRIPTION DATE CREDIT RATE RATE STATE AND/OR CITY District of Columbia 7/1/2020 $9.55 $10.00 http://lims.dccouncil.us/Download/35660/B21-0712- SignedAct.pdf $6.40 https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/bacp/Co Illinois: Chicago 7/1/2020 $5.75 nsumer%20Information/20180601minimumwageemployern otice english.pdf $5.30 https://www.cookcountyil.gov/sites/default/files/service/mo Illinois: Cook County 7/1/2020 $5.25 del-minimum-wage-notice-employees-workplace- poster_0.pdf Maine: Portland 7/1/2020 $5.50 $6.00 https://www.portlandmaine.gov/1671/Minimum-Wage Maryland: Montgomery County (51 or more 7/1/2020 $9.00 $10.00 https://www.dllr.state.md.us/labor/wages/minimumwagela employees) wmont.pdf https://www.dllr.state.md.us/forms/esstipallowinfo.pdf Maryland: Montgomery County (11-50 employees/11 https://www.dllr.state.md.us/labor/wages/minimumwagela or more employees & either a 501 (c ) (3) or certain 7/1/2020 $8.50 $9.25 wmont.pdf home health or community based services https://www.dllr.state.md.us/forms/esstipallowinfo.pdf providers/10 or fewer employees) New Jersey 7/1/2020 $7.37 $7.87 https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2018/Bills/A0500/15_R1.PDF EFFECTIVE PREVIOUS 2020 WAGE FEDERAL CONTRACTORS DATE WAGE RATE RATE Federal Contractors Current $10.60 per $10.80 per hour hour Tipped Employees (Federal Contracts) Current $7.40 per hour $7.55 per hour California Non-Exempt Rates ALAMEDA $ 15.00 BERKELEY $ 16.07 EMERYVILLE $ 16.84 EMERYVILLE $ 16.84 Non-Exempt Employees (All EEs) Non-Exempt Employees (26 or more EEs) Non-Exempt Employees (56 or more EEs) Non-Exempt Employees (55 or less EEs) Frequency Pay Periods Annual Per Period Frequency Pay Periods Annual Per Period Frequency Pay Periods Annual Per Period Frequency Pay Periods Annual Per Period Semi Monthly 24 $31,200.00 $ 1,300.00 Semi Monthly 24 $33,425.60 $ 1,392.73 Semi Monthly 24 $35,027.20 $ 1,459.47 Semi Monthly 24 $35,027.20 $ 1,459.47 Biweekly 26 $31,200.00 $ 1,200.00 Biweekly 26 $33,425.60 $ 1,285.60 Biweekly 26 $35,027.20 $ 1,347.20 Biweekly 26 $35,027.20 $ 1,347.20 Weekly 52 $31,200.00 $ 600.00 Weekly 52 $33,425.60 $ 642.80 Weekly 52 $35,027.20 $ 673.60 Weekly 52 $35,027.20 $ 673.60 Monthly 12 $31,200.00 $ 2,600.00 Monthly 12 $33,425.60 $ 2,785.47 Monthly 12 $35,027.20 $ 2,918.93 Monthly 12 $35,027.20 $ 2,918.93 L.A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendices Appendix FEIR-1 Draft EIR Comment Letters STATE of CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR's OFFICE A/PLANNING and RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE and PLANNING UNIT EDMUND G
    Appendices Appendix FEIR-1 Draft EIR Comment Letters STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE a/PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND PLANNING UNIT EDMUND G. BROWN JR. GoVERNOR November 28,2017 Milena Zasadzien City of Los Angeles AJ 200 N. Spring St, Rm 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Subject: The Fig Project SCH#: 2016071049 Dear Milena Zasadzien: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on November 27, 2017, and the comments from the responding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. If this comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten-digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21104( c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need more infornlation or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
    [Show full text]
  • ANGELS WALK FIGUEROA R FW Sites & Stanchions
    ARE AR U N K E R H SANTA MONICA BLVD FINANCIAL I L L STEPS 5TH ST 5TH ST SECTION 2 FARTHER AFIELD 5 CORE Elysian Park N FREMONT AVE Dodger WESTERN AVE BIXEL ST 11 10 PERSHING Stadium 6TH ST SQUARE NORMANDIE AVE ST LA CIENEGALA BLVD EDA LA BREA AVE BREA LA 2 W. 22ND ST W. 22ND ST AVE HIGHLAND 101 110 N 9 N. ALAM CENTRAL D WILSHIRE BLVD N. MAIN ST 12 10 Chinatown CITY 3 8 WEST 6TH ST S. HARBOR BLVD 10 LEBANON ST W. 23RD ST W. 23RD ST 13 VENIC D AVE ST PAUL AVE 7 E BL VERMONT AVE AN 710 WESTERN AVE WESTERN VD AVE NORMANDIE Figueroa Walk S W. 24TH ST T S. GR PA 1 W. WASHINGTON BLVD U GUEROA ST map area L PL FI LUCA JEWELRY B W. 24TH ST W. 24TH ST WILSHIRE BLVD 6 WILSHIRE BLVD 10 S AVE DISTRICT WESTERN AVE W. ADAMS BLVD 14 NORMANDIE AVE 60 S. HOBART BLVD S. CONGRESS AVE 4 W. 25TH ST S. LA SALLE AVE W. 25TH ST W. 25TH ST W. JEFFERSON BLVD 17 15 1 2 5 110 16 7TH ST 5 4 D EXPOSITION BLVD USC 3 C ADAMS BLVD AVE Start Section 1 ST EDA 18 NTRAL 405 CE LA CIENEGALA BLVD LA BREA AVE S. ALAM S. S. S. GR FLO 5 BROADWAY AN HO OLIVE ST OLIVE WER HILL ST D AV D PE ST ST GARLAN E BIXEL ST D AV 8TH ST 8TH ST E FRANCISCO ST Y 19 SOUTH VILLAGE ANGELS WALK FIGUEROA R FW Sites & Stanchions 8TH PL 6 21 9TH ST 7TH ST > FLOWER PAGES 8-9 9TH ST > PICO BLVD PAGES 21-24 8TH8 ST HARBO 20 22 1 7th Street/Metro Center 27 Figueroa Hotel 110 JAMES M WOOD BLVD 23 2 Fine Arts Building 28 Variety Arts Center S 28 D UNB BLA 7 URY ST 24 3 29 INE 25 Barker Brothers Building STAPLES Center ST 27 OLYMPIC BLVD 30 26 BROA Los Angeles Convention Center FIGU PAGES 10-13 YMPIC BLVD
    [Show full text]
  • West Adams Matters
    WAHAWest Adams Heritage Association July 2013 Number 293 West Adams Matters The Annual Report Issue Preservation Year In Review by Jean Frost, Vice-President, Historic Preservation Each year in the summer, WAHA prepares an Annual Report for its members, reviewing the past year’s activities and events, our revenues and expenditures, and, especially, our historic preservation and cultural heritage advocacy activities. This report (beginning on page 6) highlights certain activities but by no means is a complete comprehensive review. WAHA’s key advocacy committee is the Historic Preservation Committee. This committee often addresses planning and zoning matters as well since our local issues are often intertwined with planning and land use rather than isolated issues of preservation. Committee members actively engage in commenting on development applications, stay abreast of land use initiatives, respond to issues as they arise, keep track of historic buildings needing to be moved and possible sites to move them to, and keep up to date on changes to California’s environmental laws as they relate to historic properties. Importantly, the Historic Preservation Committee also spearheads the designation of historic resources, working with WAHA members and, at times, professional outside consultants, preparing nominations. The Committee members are Eric Bronson, Jim Childs, Rory Cunningham, Laura Meyers, Mitzi Mogul, David Raposa, Roland Souza and John Patterson. New WAHA successfully designated the Brown- members are also most welcome. Gorsline Residence, now HCM No. 1021. (continued on page 6) West Adams Endangered Site: The Herman Kerckhoff Residence by Jean Frost Councilmember Bernard Parks and his staff came to the rescue of the endangered Herman Kerckhoff Residence at 1325 West Adams Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn 2000 ISSN 1521-1576
    VOLUME 25, No. 3 CALIFORNIA Autumn 2000 ISSN 1521-1576 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION $1.4 Million in Grants for Historic Preservation in Los Angeles from Getty This issue: 2 May beck Weekend 5 CA Missions get Attention 9 Prop 12 Update The Lopez Adobe in San Fernando was awarded $50,000 to enable the city to undertake detailed historical, photographic, structural, and condition assessments that will guide future conservation efforts allowing it to reopen to the public as a house museum (City of San Fernando) A historic African-American sorority Observatory and the Greene & Greene-de­ house, an early California adobe, the Wilshire signed Oaklawn Bridge in South Pasadena­ Boulevard Temple, and Frank Lloyd Wright's for which exemplary conservation planning Freeman House are among 21 Los Angeles has already been completed will receive County landmarks that will benefit from a implementation grants of $200,000 and total of $1.4 million in grants by the J. Paul $150,000, respectively, to conserve and protect Getty Trust. The Getty's Preserve L.A. initia­ the historic structure of these landmark sites. tive, a new three-year program launched last "We are delighted to support such a wide December, provides funds to conserve range of local projects that reflect the rich and landmark buildings and sites of architectural, diverse cultural heritage of Los Angeles," said cultural, and historical significance. Deborah Marrow, director of the Getty Grant The grantees represent a broad spectrum of Program. Roberta Deering, Executive Director landmarks, from historic residences and of the California Preservation Foundation notes garden landscapes to museums, schools, that, "This program represents the first major libraries, and places of worship that have commitment of grant funds for historic preser­ played a unique role in defining the identity vation projects in California since the early 80's of local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY | Multifamily 3569 Chesapeake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90016
    REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY | Multifamily 3569 Chesapeake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90016 RYAN O’CONNOR Lee & Associates - LA North/Ventura 818.444.4965 | [email protected] BRE Lic # 01931694 CORP ID #01191898 3569 CHESAPEAKE3569 AVENUE TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................3-10 LOCATION OVERVIEW ...................................................................................... 11-17 BROKER RESUME .............................................................................................18-19 2 Redevelopment Opportunity | MULTIFAMILY 3569 Chesapeake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90016 CHESAPEAKE3569 AVENUE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 3 3569 CHESAPEAKE3569 AVENUE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Portfolio Overview Key Investment Features Address: 3569 Chesapeake Avenue • Rare Tier 3 TOC Development Opportunity: 70% Density Los Angeles, CA 90016 Bonus Plus Other Development Incentives Price: $1,180,000 • Up and Coming West Adams Location: Adjacent to the Booming Tech Hub of Culver City APN: 5046-014-011 • Ease of Transportation: Nearby 405, 10, and 110 Freeways Units: 3 Unit Mix: 2(2+1, 1(1+1) • 3 minute Walk to Farmdale Metro Station along the Expo Line: 2 Stops from Downtown Culver City, and just 7 stops Year Built: 1944 from Santa Monica and Downtown Los Angeles Building Size: 2,212 SF • Adjacent Properties will also entertain selling and/or JV opportunity. (Contact agent for more details) Lot Size: 7,165 SF Zoning: R3-1 TOC Program: Tier 3-eligible for up to 70% density bonus (Contact agent for more details regarding TOC Program) Rent Roll UNIT TYPE RATE 1 2+1 $2,125 2 2+1 $1,600 3 1+1 $1,000 4 Redevelopment Opportunity | MULTIFAMILY 3569 Chesapeake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90016 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Overview PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 3569 Chesapeake Avenue is a Tier 3 TOC development opportunity to build a brand new multifamily property of up to 16-units located in the West Adams neighborhood of Los Angeles, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanchions Angels Walk Figueroa Walk Angels
    ANGELS WALK® LA CITY CITY NATIONAL NATIONAL Angels Walk Figueroa PLAZA PLAZA ANGELS WALK FIGUEROA WALK ANGELS Select Stanchions FIGUEROA WALK ANGELS SECTION 1 – METRO FIGUEROA CITY NATIONAL PLAZA LIBRARY 1 The building, which also featured the In 1887, a few pioneers decided they Wilshire Boulevard PUBLIC Tall, Dark And city’s first underground garage, became needed a place to entertain friends with ANGELES LOS Prosperous an architectural style unto itself. It was good cigars and hard liquor, and to court / 2 RESEARCH COLLECTION City National Plaza City National Plaza’s sleek, gleam- designed by Los Angeles architect Stiles would-be investors in the booming real HISTORY PACIFIC ing, granite-sheathed, 52-story O. Clements, whose unforgettable work estate market. The founders numbered WESTERN SECURITY OF FOR 3 twin towers are monuments to included the Wiltern, El Capitan and about two dozen prominent members, 6th & Figueroa Streets CENTER COURTESY Mayan theatres. among them mil- Los Angeles’ long history and oil SEAVER PHOTO LIBRARY OF PUBLIC lionaire socialist capital, and to the banking money Corner of 1st and Broadway, 1886. COURTESY 4 ANGELES Engine Co. No. 28 developer H. Gaylord that followed the black gold. PHOTO LOS / Wilshire and banker Ad for Tally-Ho Stables and COLLECTION In the late 1920s, the For more than three decades, the Carriage Co. PACIFIC Isaias Wolf Hellman, 5 Ernst & Young Plaza/7+Fig Retail Center club bought its present SECURITY complex, which occupies a city one of the few early OF LIBRARY site on Flower Street for $1.1 million. The block, was known by its PUBLIC Jewish members.
    [Show full text]
  • Work in Progress III. RESPONSES to COMMENTS INTRODUCTION This
    III. RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTRODUCTION This section contains written responses to each of the comments on the Draft EIR received during the public review period. The responses to comments are arranged by: (1) Responses to Public Agency Comments; and (2) Responses to Public Comments. All the comment letters are included in Appendix A to this document and are shown in alphabetical order. Each letter is identified by the last name of the commenter, and each comment is delineated and numbered. The text of the individual comments is included below and is followed by a response to the comments. Corrections and additions resulting from comments on the Draft EIR are presented in Section IV, Corrections and Additions. City of Los Angeles Washington Square Mixed-Use Development State Clearinghouse No. 2009021035 July 2010 Page III-1 PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – Work in Progress III. Responses to Comments This page intentionally blank. City of Los Angeles Washington Square Mixed-Use Development State Clearinghouse No. 2009021035 July 2010 Page III-2 PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – Work in Progress III. Responses to Comments LETTER NO. 1 Scott Morgan, Acting Director Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 10th Street, P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 COMMENT NO. 1-1 The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on February 22, 2010, and the comments from the responding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • West Adams Matters
    WAHA West Adams Heritage Association May 2010 Number 264 West Adams Matters The Preservation Month Issue Historic Preservation at a Crossroads by Jean Frost We celebrate another National Preservation Month this May with a general membership meeting traditionally and annually hosted by the Historic Preservation Committee. How appropriate that this year we will be in the former Stan’s Kite, an endangered Googie style coffee shop, whose demolition is part of the development proposals for the Washington Square Shopping Center mixed use project. Stan’s Kite, now Vintage Hollywood, is a very special venue. Located in the Washington Square Shopping Center at Washington Boulevard and 10th Avenue, the former Googie Style Stan’s Kite restaurant now houses Leroy Richardson III’s remarkable memorabilia collection, of Afro-American celebrity entertainers. (see article on page 6). At the May 23 meeting, the WAHA Martin Eli Weil Award for excellence in preservation will be presented for the third time. Named after distinguished preservation architect and WAHA member Martin Eli Weil, it represents the highest honor WAHA can bestow specifically for contributions to preservation in West Adams. Weil was always there to investigate, analyze and support preservation, whether saving a vernacular house or a creating National Register District. (continued on page 10) THE PRESERVATION BEAT Sunday Brunch, May 23 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Vintage Hollywood, 10th and Washington Get ready to HOWL, all you cool Cats & Hep Kittens. The gig is down & solid Jackson. WAHA’s Annual Preservation Month Mimosa Brunch has morphed this year into “The Preservation BEAT,” and the event will be Jiving & Jamming, and Grooving with History and Land Use.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfte^^^^ ^%04^ ^%E4xdeht
    S AH/SCC AS AS JWIT.^^ i:-^.-: • •! ^.a^TA^ l.rr\lT7lf FIllMnA* VE,rf(iy^^ U^^;rA' r-ll-irfl'l Af'* .'^-•.^••fTI•|L ~ MUE 1 AS UTIL I AS FIHMn AS 5TAS USTAS UTIL TAj; FiRf-mAS 'liTAS ^ ' NAAP WlLi*^ f^HrSiTA?. VE.NUSTAS UTU^^JiTH^-li v".r.lfs^ USTAS UTIL IAS FlfMITA? HAPTEl TAS post office box 9 2 224, posodena, ca 91109- 2 2 24 800.9 SAHSCC www.sahscc.org LD OS U.S. Postage FIRST CLASS MAIL bookmarks page2 PAID Pasadena, CA Sundays at la sala pages Permit No. 740 november and december events p^ges 4-5 architectural (khibitions PJ^S>^ ^ rd members WKKKKWKtt- p^ge Exterior view of Richard Neutra's Lovell-Health House (192'. /4 'Tfte^^^^ ^%04^ ^%e4xdeHt You are part of a stellar group. SAH/SCC is the largest and most active SAH chapter Year-End Review (2000) in the country. Not only have we sponsored more events in the past year than in any Here's a look back on the SAH/SCC events that took previous year (see sidebar), but also a greater number of those events have been free place in the past year. Thanks to all the board for our members. In addition, we are pleased to be regarded as a highly visible members for their hard work in making these tours and lectures a success. resource within the architectural and cultural communities of Southern California. SAH/SCC is healthier than ever financially, and poised to offer another year of February outstanding events. We will continue our primary focus on education.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 Aesthetics Draft EIR
    West Adams New Community Plan 4.1 Aesthetics Draft EIR 4.1 AESTHETICS This section provides an overview of visual changes that would occur and evaluates impacts associated with the proposed West Adams New Community Plan. Topics addressed include visual character, views and vistas, scenic resources, light and glare, and shade and shadows. Methodology As required under CEQA, the aesthetic analysis of a project must disclose the potential impacts the project would have on the existing visual character of the project area and surroundings. The concept of visual character, however, is not explicitly defined in the CEQA Guidelines or the City of Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide.1 Therefore, in this aesthetics discussion, potential visual character impacts will be determined based on industry-accepted definitions of visual character. Visual character can be defined in terms of the overall impression formed by the relationship between perceived visual elements of the built, urban environment existing in the potentially impacted area. Elements contributing to this impression include the following: • The nature and quality of buildings • The compatibility between uses and activities with the built environment • The quality of streetscape, including roadways, sidewalks, plazas, parks, and street furniture • The nature and quality of landscaping that is visible to the general public Visual character functions as a point of reference in assessing whether a project’s features would appear to be compatible with the established built environment. In
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-July-August-Waha-News.Pdf
    July-August 2014 Number 303 West Adams Matters The Annual Report Issue Preservation Year in Review (And What A Year It Was) WAHA Wins Bishop Mansion Lawsuit; 15 More West Adams Monuments Designated by Jean Frost This has been a landmark year for West Adams Heritage Association. Each year in the summer, WAHA prepares an Annual Report (beginning on page 10) for its members, reviewing the past year’s activities and events, our revenues and expenditures, and, especially, our historic preservation and cultural heritage advocacy activities. WAHA’s singular achievement, after many months of advocacy, is the success of WAHA’s lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles for allowing issuance of a categorical exemption on a project that negatively impacted historic properties, the Roger Williams Baptist Church and Bishop Residence (1342 West Adams Boulevard.) WAHA won the case when the owners (the Real Parties in Interest in legal terms) agreed not to move forward with their project until the Department of City Planning conducts an environmental review of the Project under CEQA. This is what WAHA sought by its petition to the court and ends this phase of action. (See more information in a separate article on page 2.) Much of the work undertaken to achieve this result was shepherded by the WAHA Historic Preservation Committee. The journey began in early 2013 when WAHA member David Raposa noticed that the Bishop Residence had been gutted on the interior, without permits. (continued on page 12) A Gathering of the Blue and the Gray –– Annual Living History Tour Showcases Our Civil War Heritage At the Angelus Rosedale Cemetery, History Comes to Life on Saturday, September 27, as we commemorate the 150th Anniversary of the Civil War, with stories told by those who witnessed it.
    [Show full text]
  • West Adams Matters
    WAHA West Adams Heritage Association October 2012 Number 286 West Adams Matters Celebrate the Holidays: WAHA’s 25th Annual Holiday Tour, Saturday and Sunday, December 1 and 2 For this year’s Annual Holiday Historic Homes Tour and Progressive Dinner, WAHA extends to our guests “A Warm Welcome to Wellington Square.” This gracious neighborhood is a vivid representation of the rapid growth that Los Angeles experienced in the early 1920s in the years following the end of “The Great War.” There are a few examples of the wonderful Craftsman homes that were typical of nearby neighborhoods constructed prior to WWI, but most of the homes that grace the broad streets of Wellington Square reflect the eclectic styles of a vibrant young city, with Spanish, Tudor, Norman, and other “Revival” styles throughout the neighborhood. The 1920s were a vital as well as challenging time for the West Adams District, with its new Wellington Square enclave coming into its own at the same time as developers’ attentions was drifting to other parts of Los Angeles. The iconic Hollywoodland sign first graced the hillside to the north, and new construction downtown brought us such famous landmarks as the Biltmore Hotel (1923), the Central Library (1926), the “skyscraping” new City Hall (1927). This year’s progressive dinner will visit a choice selection of homes and styles along the main avenue of Wellington Square, and while the original grand gates (continued on page 6) Neighborhood Council Elections in West Adams Saturday, October 27 Neighborhood council elections are slated for all of the neighborhood councils in the Historic West Adams District.
    [Show full text]