Islamic Law \Wi / and •'»»*• Society BRILL ^'^"'"''^ '^"' """i S""'^ 20-1-2 (2013) 48-89 .„vw.brííi.com/iis Contesting Intoxication: Early Juristic Debates over the Lawfulness of Alcoholic Beverages* Najam Haider Abstract This study examines legal debates over the lawfulness of alcoholic beverages between Mälikl/Shäfi'i and Hanafi jurists. While there was an early consensus surrounding the prohibition of an intoxicating drink derived from grapes, disagreements persisted regarding intoxicants obtained from non-grape sources. The primary advocates for the prohibition of all intoxicants were Mâlikî and Shäfi'i jurists whose works were increasingly devoted to attacking their Hanafi counterparts. Mäliki critiques centered on arguments rooted in the Qur'än, while Shäfi'i critiques relied on traditions from the Prophet/Companions. The Hanafis argued for a narrow prohibition limited to a single drink (i.e., khamr) and forbade other drinks only if consumed to the point of intoxication. Over time, the Hanafis abandoned their original position and endorsed complete prohibition due, perhaps, to the growing moral stigma associated with intoxicants. They did so by "reinterpreting" the views of one of their founding figures, Muhammad b. al-Hasan al-Shaybâni (d. 189/806). Keywords Khamr, Nabidh, Intoxicants, Alcohol, Abu Hanifa, al-Shaybâni, Hanafism, Kùfa Correspondence: Najam Haider, Department of Religion, Barnard College, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027. E-mail:
[email protected] * A broader (in terms of the law schools covered) but less detailed (in terms of sources) version of this discussion can be found in Najam Haider, Origins of the Shi'a (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 138-62.