Conference Bios
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Statewide Logistics Plan for North Carolina
Statewide Logistics Plan for North Carolina An Investigation of the Issues with Recommendations for Action APPENDICES By George F. List, Ph.D, P.E. P.I. and Head, Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Robert S. Foyle, P.E. Co-P.I. and Associate Director, ITRE North Carolina State University Henry Canipe Senior Manager TransTech Management, Inc. John Cameron, Ph.D. Managing Partner TransTech Management, Inc. Erik Stromberg Ports and Harbors Practice Leader Hatch, Mott, MacDonald LLC For the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management May 13, 2008 Appendices Appendix A: Powerpoint Slide Sets Presentations include: Tompkins Associates North Carolina Statewide Logistics Proposal North Carolina Statewide Logistics Plan Cambridge Systematics Freight Demand and Logistics – Trends and Issues Highway Freight Transportation – Trends and Issues Rail Freight Transportation – Trends and Issues Waterborne Freight Transportation – Trends and Issues State DOTs and Freight – Trends and Issues Virginia Statewide Multimodal Freight Study - Phase I Overview Global Insight Shifts in Global Trade Patterns – Meaning for North Carolina 5/5/2008 North Carolina Statewide Logistics Proposal Presented to: North Carolina State University Project Team Charlotte, NC March 13, 2008 Caveat… This presentation and discussion is from the Shipper’s perspective… ASSO C I ATES CONFIDENTIAL — Use or disclosure of this information is restricted. 2 1 5/5/2008 North American Port Report (1/08) A majority of the Supply Chain Consortium respondents to the North American Port Report survey believe that their supply chain network is not optimal with respect to the ports used for their ocean freight. Significant opportunities exist from getting all aspects of the supply chain aligned to optimizing costs and customer service. -
Transportation Demand Management Project Evaluation and Funding Methods in the Denver Region Review and Recommendations
Transportation Demand Management Project Evaluation and Funding Methods in the Denver Region Review and Recommendations final report prepared for Colorado Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. February 2010 www.camsys.com final report Transportation Demand Management Project Evaluation and Funding Methods in the Denver Region Review and Recommendations prepared for Colorado Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, MA 02140 with Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. date February 2010 Transportation Demand Management Project Evaluation and Funding Methods in the Denver Region Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Review of Peer Region Practices in Project Evaluation, Selection, and Funding Allocation ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 CMAQ Funding Allocation and Evaluation Methods (General) ......... 2-1 2.2 TDM Funding Allocation and Evaluation Methods (General) ............ 2-3 2.3 Existing DRCOG TDM Funding Allocation Method ............................ 2-4 2.4 TDM Allocation Methods (Peer Regions) ............................................... 2-7 Atlanta, Georgia ......................................................................................... -
The Positive Impacts of Transportation Investment NCHRP Project 8-36, Task 22 Compilation of Working Papers
The Positive Impacts of Transportation Investment NCHRP Project 8-36, Task 22 compilation of working papers prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board National Research Council prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February 2002 compilation of working papers The Positive Impacts of Transportation Investment NCHRP Project 8-36, Task 22 prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board National Research Council prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 150 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 4000 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 February 2002 The Positive Impacts of Transportation Investment Table of Contents Working Paper 1: Economic Benefits of Transportation Investment.......................... 1-1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.0 Transportation Investment Boosts Industry Competitiveness ........................ 1-5 2.0 Transportation Investment Enhances Household Welfare .............................. 1-10 3.0 Transportation Investment Strengthens Local, Regional, and State Economies...................................................................................................... 1-14 4.0 Transportation Investment Boosts Business and Leisure Travel .................... 1-21 5.0 Transportation Investment Reduces Economic Losses Associated with Accidents.................................................................................... 1-25 6.0 Transportation Investment -
Sketch Tools for Regional Sustainability Scenario Planning
Acknowledgments This study was conducted for the AASHTO Standing Committee on Planning, with funding provided through the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 08-36, Research for the AASHTO Standing Committee on Planning. The NCHRP is supported by annual voluntary contributions from the state Departments of Transportation. Project 08-36 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the Standing Committee on Planning. The report was prepared by Uri Avin of the National Center for Smart Growth (NCSG), University of Maryland, with Christopher Porter and David von Stroh of Cambridge Systematics, Eli Knaap of the NCSG, and Paul Patnode, NCSG Affiliate. The work was guided by a technical working group that included: Robert Balmes, Michigan Department of Transportation, Chair; William Cesanek, CDM Smith; Robert Deaton, North Carolina Department of Transportation; Thomas Evans; Kristen Keener-Busby, Urban Lands Institute, Arizona; Amanda Pietz, Oregon Department of Transportation; Elizabeth Robbins, Washington State Department of Transportation; Nicolas Garcia, Liaison, Federal Transit Administration; and Fred Bowen, Liaison, Federal Highway Administration. The project was managed by Lori L. Sundstrom, NCHRP Senior Program Officer. Disclaimer The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsoring agencies. This report has not been reviewed or accepted by the Transportation -
General Planning Consulting Services for Transportation Department – Rfp No
GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT – RFP NO. PNC2119955P1 EVALUATION Kimley-Horn and Kittelson and CDM Smith, Inc. CTS Engineering, Inc. H.W. Lochner, Inc. CRITERIA Associates, Inc. Associates, Inc. PROJECT- SPECIFIC Vendor Response Vendor Response Vendor Response Vendor Response Vendor Response CRITERIA 1. Ability of Professional Personnel: (Maximum 30 points) Enhanced mobility, linked CTS Engineering, Inc. Lochner is a full-service Our core team of key Our Team understands that 1. Describe the communities, and alternatives (CTS), in association with multidiscipline firm with more personnel provides a high Broward County is poised for qualifications and to new roads are the catalysts Gannett Fleming, Inc. (GF), than 600 professionals who level of responsiveness to the success – with resident’s relevant experience of for considering public Cambridge Systematics, collaborate to deliver all modes Broward County support for their Mobility the Project Manager and transportation solutions. As Inc. (CS), Connetics of innovative, cost-effective Transportation Department Advancement Program all key staff that are an award-winning provider of Transportation Group, Inc. solutions in transportation (BCTD), both in terms of (MAP), Broward County intended to be assigned transit-related services, CDM (CTG), Via Planning, Inc. planning, traffic engineering, exceptional project stands ready to build a “safe, to the project. Include Smith applies in-depth (VIA), Smart-Sciences, Inc., roadway design, rail/transit, understanding and support, sustainable, integrated and resumes for the Project industry knowledge, research, The Leap Group, LLC. structures, environmental, and extensive technical efficient transportation system Manager and all key staff state- of-the-art planning (LEAP), ADEPT Public aviation, construction and expertise in the disciplines to enhance Broward County’s described.