A Report on Oceania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Report on Oceania ctbuh.org/papers Title: A Report on Oceania Author: Henry Jack Cowan, University of Sydney Subjects: Building Case Study History, Theory & Criticism Keyword: Verticality Publication Date: 2001 Original Publication: CTBUH 2001 6th World Congress, Melbourne Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Henry Jack Cowan COUNTRY REPORTS A Report on Oceania Henry J. Cowan Until the mid-19th century few buildings in Australia were higher than two storeys. This changed after the Gold Rush of 1851. By 1880 the population of Melbourne had increased from 20 000 to more than half a million. It had become the third largest city of the British Empire, and the headquarters of most Australian banks and important commercial enterprises. But even with this increase in population density few buildings exceeded four stories, because it was considered that people would not climb more stairs. In 1884 Wilhelm Prell proposed to erect another 4-storey building at 15 Queen Street when he received a visit from a Vice-President of Otis who had been sent to Australia to get business for the American company. He convinced Prell that if he put up a six-storey building with an elevator, the upper two storeys would yield as much rent as the ground floor. The success of this build- ing caused Prell to erect three nine-storey elevator buildings, and several more followed. Melbourne was then not far behind Chicago, where a newspaper editorial writer coined the term skyscraper for buildings ten storeys or more in height. In 1891 Chicago had nine skyscrapers. The demand for efficient elevators was met by the installation of a system of high-pressure water pipes under the city street surfaces. In 1887 Melbourne became the world’s fourth city to build a public hydraulic power system, used for hoists and wool presses, as well as elevators. Since this power was available at the turn of a tap, there was a rapid increase in the number of elevator buildings. At the turn of the century Sydney again became Australia’s leading city. As its building heights increased, it also installed a hydraulic power system. Culwalla Chambers was built in 1912 to a height of 170 feet, and this led to a demand for a limitation on the height of buildings. The fire brigade’s turntables could only reach 150 feet, so that the top floors were out of their reach. The growing environmental movement argued that tall buildings ruined the city as a place to live in; but the main problem was that the building, as constructed in 1912, was very ugly. The City Council passed a resolution limiting building heights to 150 feet, which remained law for 43 years, and was soon adopted in Melbourne. This limitation was not as restrictive as it might now seem, because the short era of post-World-War I prosperity was followed by the Great Depression, and then by World-War II, and there was really no pressing demand for taller buildings. 736 Country Reports The height limitation was removed in 1955 when commercial construction resumed after the War. The first building to exceed 150 feet was the AMP Building at Circular Quay in Sydney, a 31-storey steel-framed building, 117 m high, com- pleted in 1961. Its architects were Peddle Thorp and Walker, and the structural engineer was John Rankine, a former Chairman of the Council on Tall Buildings. His design introduced the basic principles followed by most subsequent tall build- ings: the use of a long-span floor structure to obtain a column-free interior, stiff connections for rigid-frame action, and transfer trusses at plantroom level. Many more high-rise buildings were erected in Sydney and Melbourne in the 1960s and 70s. New height records were set in 1968 by the 40-storey con- crete-framed Australia Square Tower and in 1977 by the 60-storey concrete- framed MLC Centre, both designed by architect Harry Seidler and consulting engineers Miller, Milston Ferris. At 228 m the latter remained the tallest build- ing outside North and South America for many years. In 1985 the Rialto Tower, a 60-storey concrete office building, 242 m high, was completed in Melbourne, and this is still the tallest building in Australasia and Oceania. Its architects were Perrott Lyon Matheson, and its engineer was W. L. Meinhardt. Of the ten tallest buildings in the region, 5 are at present in Melbourne, 3 in Sydney and 2 in Perth. There has been no significant increase in height since 1977, just as there has been no significant increase in height in the United States since the 1930s when the Empire State Building was built. But there has been in other countries, particularly in Asia. So now there are only two Australian build- ings among the one hundred of the world’s tallest. There is a clear case for tall buildings in Australia, as in other countries of the New World. They make the Central Business District more efficient, and more interesting architecturally. The first tall building was built in Central Sydney in 1960. Recent tall buildings are not as tall as in America, because the population density is lower. The maximum height is in Australia determined by economic factors, and not by technical considerations. This economic limitation on height is over-ruled only when an all-powerful company or a politician not restrained by democratic procedures wants to set a new record. We could build much higher if we wanted to do so. Adelaide, the capital of South Australia, entered the tall building field early, but then decided that they were out of character with its Georgian tradi- tions, and its tallest building today is the Santos Building, a 32-storey structure originally built for the State Bank. The presently tallest buildings in Western Australia and in Queensland both date from 1988. The R&I Tower in Perth by architects Cameron Chisholm and Nicol and engineers Ove Arup has a 52-storey concrete frame, 214 m high. Central Plaza One in Brisbane, by architects Peddle Thorp and engineers Maunsell, also has a concrete frame, but it is only 44 storeys, 174 m in height. All three are office buildings. New Zealand is part of my territory, and there are some significant tall buildings in Auckland. The tallest is the 38-storey ANZ Building, constructed in 1989. Oceania is also part of my territory. It is a very large part of the Earth’s Cowan – A Report on Oceania 737 surface, and consists mostly of small islands, which need, and have only small buildings. There has been a steady move of population to the warmer climate of the North, and I think the most interesting future developments in tall building design may eventuate in Brisbane, the capital city of resource-rich Queensland. .
Recommended publications
  • Attachment A
    Attachment A Report Prepared by External Planning Consultant 3 Recommendation It is resolved that consent be granted to Development Application D/2017/1652, subject to the following: (A) the variation sought to Clause 6.19 Overshadowing of certain public places in accordance with Clause 4.6 'Exceptions to development standards' of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 be supported in this instance; and (B) the requirement under Clause 6.21 of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 requiring a competitive design process be waived in this instance; and (C) the requirement under Clause 7.20 of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 requiring the preparation of a development control plan be waived in this instance; Reasons for Recommendation The reasons for the recommendation are as follows: (A) The proposal, subject to recommended conditions, is consistent with the objectives of the planning controls for the site and is compatible with the character of the area into which it will be inserted. It will provide a new unique element in the public domain which has been specifically designed to highlight Sydney’s main boulevard and the important civic precinct of Town Hall and the Queen Victoria Building. (B) The proposed artwork is permissible on the subject land and complies with all relevant planning controls with the exception of overshadowing of Sydney Town Hall steps. While the proposal will result in some additional shadowing of the steps this impact will be minor and is outweighed by the positive impacts of the proposal. (C) The proposal is of a nature compatible with the overall function of the locality as a civic precinct in the heart of the Sydney CBD.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review
    Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Interim Result
    INTERIM RESULT 2018 SECTION SPEAKER AGENDA 2018 Interim Result Highlights Bob Johnston Financial Summary & Capital Management Anastasia Clarke Retail Vanessa Orth Office & Logistics Matthew Faddy Funds Management Nicholas Harris Summary & Outlook Bob Johnston INTERIM RESULT 2018 RESULTS PRESENTATION 3 2018 Interim Result Financial Highlights 2018 Interim Result Financial Highlights Our Vision To be the most respected property company in Australia 3.2% 2.5% in the eyes of our Investors, People, Customers and FFO GROWTH DISTRIBUTION GROWTH Communities PER SECURITY PER SECURITY % Our Purpose $5.31 13.9 To create value by delivering superior returns to NTA PER TOTAL RETURN Investors, and by providing environments that enable our SECURITY (12 MONTHS) People to excel and Customers and Communities to prosper The GPT Group 2018 Interim Result 3 Progress on Strategic Priorities Progress on Strategic Priorities Investment Portfolio Balance Sheet & Capital Management + Portfolio occupancy of 97.4% + Net Gearing at 24.7% + Like for Like income growth 3.9% + Interest rate hedging at 79% + Revaluation gains of $457 million + Credit ratings A / A2 + Weighted Average Cap Rate 5.14% + Weighted average debt maturity of 6.6 years + Total Portfolio Return of 11.5% Development Pipeline Funds Management + Sunshine Plaza 75% leased + Assets Under Management of $12.4 billion + 32 Smith Street terms agreed for 51% of NLA + 12 month total return of 13.5% + Logistics developments underway and on-track + Market leading wholesale platform + Rouse Hill Town Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Download Fiche (Pdf)
    NR & NEW INTERNATIONAL SELECTION DOCUMENTATION MINIMUM FICHE For office use Wp/ref no Nai ref no Composed by working party of: Australia DOCOMOMO Australia Australia Square, Harry Seidler 1967 1 Identity of building/group of buildings/urban scheme/landscape/garden 1.1 Current Name of Building Australia Square 1.2 Variant or Former Name 1.3 Number & Name of Street 264-278 George St 1.4 Town Sydney 1.5 Province New South Wales 1 1.6 Zip code 2000 1.7 Country Australia 1.8 National grid reference 1.9 Classification/typology Commercial 1.10 Protection Status & Date RAIA NSW Chapter Register of 20th Century Buildings of Significance (item 4703039) 2 History of building The design concept for Australia Square aimed at solving the problems of urban redevelopment in a comprehensive way. The Australia Square project aimed at bringing a new openness into the congested heart of the city, with plaza areas open to the sky, an arcaded ground floor design and a circular 50-storey tower which allowed maximum light into surrounding streets. Australia Square was a landmark development in the 1960s. Its planning, design and construction were marked by creative innovation. Australia Square challenged the planning and architectural thinking of the time. The result was praised and indeed became a highly significant project in the wider context of development in Sydney. The site of Australia Square was the product of a protracted site consolidation carried through by G J Dusseldorp, building promoter and developer, Chairman of Lend Lease Corporation. From the early 1950s the concept of redeveloping parts of the city by consolidating small city lots to form a single larger site suitable for the erection of a skyscraper had been discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only Use Personal For
    10 February 2020 2019 Annual Result Property Compendium GPT provides its 2019 Annual Result Property Compendium which is authorised for release by the GPT Group Company Secretary. -ENDS- For more information, please contact: INVESTORS MEDIA Brett Ward Grant Taylor Head of Investor Relations & Corporate Communications Manager Affairs +61 437 994 451 +61 403 772 123 For personal use only Level 51, MLC Centre, 19-29 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000 www.gpt.com.au 2019 Annual Result2018 INTERIM PropertyRESULT Compendium PROPERTY COMPENDIUM For personal use only Contents Retail Portfolio 3 Office Portfolio 28 Logistics Portfolio 75 For personal use only Retail Portfolio Annual Result 2019 For personal use only CasuarinaFor personal use only Square Northern Territory 4 Casuarina Square, Northern Territory Casuarina Square is the dominant shopping destination in Darwin and the Northern Territory. The centre is located in the northern suburbs of Darwin, a 15 minute drive from Darwin’s Central Business District (CBD) and 20 minutes from the satellite town of Palmerston. The centre incorporates 198 tenancies including two discount department stores, two supermarkets, cinema and entertainment offer. The centre is also complemented by a 303 bed student accommodation facility operated by Unilodge. Casuarina Square is home to one of Australia’s largest solar rooftop systems after installation of the 1.25MW (megawatt) system in 2015. Key Metrics as at 31 December 2019 General Current Valuation Ownership Interest GPT: 50%, GWSCF: 50% Fair Value1 GPT: $248.0m
    [Show full text]
  • The Suites at the Square
    36LEVEL The Suites at The Square Bespoke office suites inspired by Australia Square’s art and architecture Australia Square Australia Premium space in iconic Sydney CBD tower Spectacular city and harbour views Unrivalled corporate location and transport accessibility A grade amenities and services Brand new end of trip facilities with lockers, showers and bike racks Wellness Room with daily fitness classes Dedicated 5 star executive Concierge team Australia Square Dining with wide variety of food retailers, bars and restaurants 4.5 star NABERS energy rating Level 36 Level 36 BOND STREET SUITE 36.01 SUITES NERVI SUITE 429.6sqm Drawing inspiration from Australia Square’s iconic art and SUITE 36.04 architecture, the thoughtfully designed Level 36 Suites are a SOL LE WITT SUITE fantastic opportunity to make your move into this iconic location. 163.8sqm The Level 36 Suites design concept came from key monuments and themes associated with Australia Square, with a focus on the future of wellness and technology. Featuring the highest quality materials and unique designs, each suite displays its own identity while maintaining a consistent corporate aesthetic. Ready to go: PITT STREET Fully Cabled: Supplementary Boardroom HD GEORGE STREET Data and Power Air-conditioning LED LCD Smart TV SUITE 36.03 CALDER SUITE 179.1sqm SUITE 36.02 FOUNTAIN SUITE 223.5sqm CURTIN PLACE Suite 36.01 Nervi A BEAUTIFUL CHEMISTRY OF TIMELESS DESIGN Harry Seidler collaborated with world-renowned engineer Pier Luigi Nervi to deliver Australia Square as an iconic landmark on the Sydney skyline. The Nervi Suite uses soft curves, unexpected angles and soft light tones to resemble Nervi’s exposed lobby ceiling design of interlocking concrete ribs.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Australia ASIC Gazette 24/01 Dated 1 November
    = = `çããçåïÉ~äíÜ=çÑ=^ìëíê~äá~= = Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. ASIC 24/01, Thursday 1 November 2001 (Special) Published by ASIC ^^ppff``==dd~~òòÉÉííííÉÉ== Contents Banking Act Unclaimed Money as at 31 December 2000 Specific disclaimer for Special Gazette relating to Banking Unclaimed Monies The information in this Gazette is provided by Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions to ASIC pursuant to the Banking Act (Commonwealth) 1959. The information is published by ASIC as supplied by the relevant Authorised Deposit-taking Institution and ASIC does not add to the information. ASIC does not verify or accept responsibility in respect of the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information, and, if there are any queries or enquiries, these should be made direct to the Authorised Deposit-taking Institution. ISSN 1445-6060 Available from www.asic.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia, 2001 Email [email protected] This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all rights are reserved. Requests for authorisation to reproduce, publish or communicate this work should be made to: Gazette Publisher, Australian Securities and Investment Commission, GPO Box 5179AA, Melbourne Vic 3001 Commonwealth of Australia Gazette ASIC Gazette (Special) ASIC 24/01, Thursday 1 November 2001 Banking Act 1959 Unclaimed Money Page 2= = Banking Unclaimed Money as at 31 December 2000 Section 69 of Banking Act 1959 Statement of Unclaimed Money under the Banking Act General Information The publication contains details of amounts of $500.00 or more which Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions have paid to the Commonwealth Government as unclaimed moneys in accordance with Section 69 of the Banking Act 1959 for the year ended 31 December 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Apo-Nid132901.Pdf
    This book is published by The Property Council of Australia, ^ Level 26, Australia Square, 264_27g George Street, Sydney NSW 20OO P PERTY Telephone: (02) 9252 9111 COUNCIL Facsimile: (02) 9252 g1O3 of With the generous support.of the Victorian Australia property Division of the Council of Austratia August 1999 PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE CONTENTS President's Message 1 The Property Council of Australia believes good matters' lt does so because quality urban design lntroduction 2 urban space can provide substantial economic returns to property investors as well as being Pyrmont's Point Street 4 enjoyable places to live and work. This principle is Tyne Street Development 6 clearly demonstrated in "The Design Dividend" - a term which will headline any future property Hastings Street Noosa 7 investors dictionary. Moore Park Gardens I The Design Dividend project tested the proposi- 10 tion that good design pays handsome dividends. Park Hyatt Hotel Furthermore, it also helps promote the efforts of KPMG House 12 many property owners and developers in pursuing and incorporating good design within the built The Queen Victoria Building 13 The Design Dividend Proiect environment, Darling Park & Cockle Bay 14 wos conducted in colloborotion On behalf of the Property Council, I thank all East Perth 16 w¡th The Property Council's sponsors and collaborators who contributed to the project. Their support has assisted the Property Australian Technology Park 18 Notionol ond Urbon Council in promoting the benefits derived from Victorion Postcode 3000 19 good urban design and the resulting dividends to Plonning Committees. investors. RMIT University 20 Above all, the Design Dividend project demon- East Rundle Street 21 We grotefully ocknowledge the generous support of our sponsors strates tangible industry commitment to quality in Geelong Waterfront 22 development and the urban environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Suite 47, Level 9, 88 Pitt Street, Sydney
    Leased Suite 47, Level 9, 88 Pitt Street, Sydney Fitted Suite - 54 Sqm - Sydney's CBD Core - 54 sqm Price $37,800 + GST Property type Commercial - Fitted and furnished Property ID 597 - Fitted suite with reception area, boardroom and 2 offices Agent Details - Ducted air conditioning system Robin Simpson - 0426 251 234 - Premier building with - Access to large rooftop terrace Office Details - Close to Martin Place and Hunter Connection Sydney Suite 708, Level 7, 37 Bligh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Location - 88 Pitt Street, Sydney is superbly located in the heart of Sydney's Central 02 9223 0891 Business District. The property is ideally positioned in relation to Sydney's financial and banking precincts and within a short walking distance to George Street, the Sydney Stock Exchange, Futures Exchange and some of the City's major commercial landmarks, such as, the MLC Centre, Australia Square and Chifley Tower. Wynyard and Martin Place Stations are nearby. Circular Quay ferry terminal is located only minutes to the north. Call Robin 042 6251 234 Email: [email protected] The above information provided has been furnished to us by the vendor/s. We have not verified whether or not that information is accurate and do not have any belief in one way or the other in its accuracy. We do not accept any responsibility to any person for its accuracy and do no more than pass it on. All interested parties should make and rely upon their own inquiries in order to determine whether or not this information is in fact accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Modern Architecture Seen Through European Journals (1945-75)
    When Distance Matters: Australian Modern Architecture Seen Through European Journals (1945-75) Ana Esteban Maluenda Universidad Politécnica de Madrid If we look at an Antipodes World Map, Europe and Australasia are relatively close, so much so that New Zealand and Spain share a virtual territory. Thinking about antipodes, remoteness implies coincidence and distance brings countries closer together. This paper aims to track the spread that modern Australian architecture reached in some of the main European nodes of reception and emission of news: France, Great Britain, Italy, Switzerland and Spain. Based on articles published in the architectural periodicals of the moment, it will establish which aspects of Australian architecture mattered in these countries. More importantly, these cases can be compared with each other and, as a whole, with the interest that other closer continents aroused in Europe. Did distance play the same role in all cases? , edited , edited Or had any other circumstances, such as politics or economics, more weight in the rapprochement between countries? Is the presence of Australian architecture in modern canonical historiography the direct result of these exchanges of information? In short, does historiography have a debt to distance? , Distance Looks Back Keywords: Diffusion of modern architecture; European architecture periodicals; 36 Australian modern architecture; Harry Seidler; Sydney Opera House Proceedings of the Society of Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand
    [Show full text]
  • FDC Group Capability Statement About Us 01 Who We Are What We Do How We Do It Where We Work Our Team Our National Leadership Team
    FDC Group Capability Statement About Us 01 Who we are What we do How we do it Where we work Our team Our national leadership team Project Experience 02 Overview Fitout Refurbishment Construction Technologies & Mechanical Delivery 03 Our journey Corporate Data 04 FDC and the environment Sustainability in building: Green Star, NABERS, WELL & LEED Accreditations and certifications Industrial Relations & insurances Industry awards Corporate social responsibility CONTENTS 01 About Us 01 Who we are A multi-disciplinary building contractor A builder with construction, fitout and refurbishment expertise Company A builder with integrated services divisions (data, electrical and mechanical) A team of over 600 people passionate about building A significant portfolio of mission critical projects Established in 1990 A group with a consistently profitable trading history History A business with annual turnover of circa $1B Financially sound, without debt or overdraft Owned and operated by our shareholders Construction Management, Head Contractor or Turnkey delivery options Proven performance in high risk environments Focus Impressive record for on-time, on-budget delivery Dedicated, specialist delivery teams assembled Risk mitigation a primary objective Focused on service, quality and relationships Flexible, non adversarial attitude Culture Dedicated to team oriented success Multi-award winning project portfolio Strong community and charitable spirit Quality certified QA:ISO 9001:2015 Safety certified OHS:AS/NZS 4801:2001 Accreditations Environment certified EMS:ISO 14001:2015 Pre-qualified for State Government works Federal Safety Commissioner Certification (FSC) 01 We construct, fitout and refurbish spaces, often after hours. Projects What we do across a broad spectrum of clients may be a new fitout, modifications and market sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover All Participating American Express Delicious. Month Out
    Discover all participating American Express delicious. Month Out 1 MARCH - 31 MARCH 2020 locations in the Sydney CBD. 1014 TEN FOURTEEN 12 MICRON 1821 HOTEL 360 BAR & DINING 710-722 GEORGE STREET 100 BARANGAROO AVENUE 122 PITT STREET 100 MARKET STREET HAYMARKET 2000 SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 6 HEAD 1788 60 BUVETTE 678 KOREAN BBQ 89 SANDWICHES SHOP 10-11 60 MARTIN PLACE SHOP 34 NUMBER ONE DIXON SHOP F16 HUNTER CONNECTION CAMPBELL’S STORES SYDNEY 2000 1 DIXON STREET 7-13 HUNTER STREET THE ROCKS 2000 HAYMARKET 2000 SYDNEY 2000 A LA TURKO ABB AIR 1982 ADRIA BAR & GRILL ALBERTO’S LOUNGE LEVEL 2 WESTFIELD SYDNEY LEVEL 9 WORLD SQUARE GROUND LEVEL COCKLE BAY 17 ALBERTA STREET 450 GEORGE STREET 644 GEORGE ST WHARF SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 201B SUSSEX ST SYDNEY 2000 ALEXANDER’S PATISSERIE ALFREDO ALL HANDS BREWING HOUSE ALPHA RESTAURANT LEVEL 6 MLC CENTRE 16 BULLETIN PLACE 22 THE PROMENADE 238 CASTLEREAGH STREET 19 MARTIN PLACE SYDNEY 2000 KING STREET WHARF SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 ALSALAM ANASON ANGEL ANJAPPAR TOWN HALL SQUARE 79 LIVERPOOL STREET SHOP 5 125 PITT STREET 580 GEORGE STREET SYDNEY 2000 23 BARANGAROO AVENUE SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 BARANGAROO 2000 APPETITIO PIZZA PASTA BAR ARIA RESTAURANT ARISUN ARISUN CHINATOWN 100 GEORGE STREET 1 MACQUARIE STREET 99 LIVERPOOL STREET SHOP 35 NUMBER ONE DIXON THE ROCKS 2000 SYDNEY 2000 SYDNEY 2000 1 DIXON STREET HAYMARKET 2000 ASH ST CELLAR ASSAMM ASSEMBLY BAR AT BANGKOK RESTAURANT 300 GEORGE STREET LEVEL LG QVB LEVEL 9 REGENT PLACE SHOP G11 CAPITOL SQUARE SYDNEY 2000
    [Show full text]