Jeremiah Chapter 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jeremiah Chapter 8 Jeremiah Chapter 8 Verses 1-3: As a mockery, God would allow this desecration, spreading the “bones” of the dead Jewish leaders before Judah’s “god” (the “sun”, the “moon,” and all of the “host of heaven”), which were of no help in time of need. Jeremiah 8:1 "At that time, saith the LORD, they shall bring out the bones of the kings of Judah, and the bones of his princes, and the bones of the priests, and the bones of the prophets, and the bones of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, out of their graves:" “Bring out the bones”: Conquerors would ransack all the tombs to gain treasures and then humiliate the Jews by scattering the bones of all, including the rich and honored in open spaces, as a tribute to the superiority of their gods (verse 2). We see in this Scripture they had no regard for the bodies of the dead. It did not matter whether it was the bones of some official in the government or some high official in the temple, they did not bury their bodies. They just left them to the vultures. It appears also from this, they might have even robbed some of the graves and brought their bones out too. This is showing total disgust and disregard for the people of Judah and Benjamin. Jeremiah 8:2 "And they shall spread them before the sun, and the moon, and all the host of heaven, whom they have loved, and whom they have served, and after whom they have walked, and whom they have sought, and whom they have worshipped: they shall not be gathered, nor be buried; they shall be for dung upon the face of the earth." The stars refers to “the host of heaven”. This shows not only that they should be publicly exposed; but, as it refers to their idolatrous worship of the sun, moon, and stars, that these deities will not be able to help them. As they could not prevent their dead bodies being dug up, so neither could they order or cause them to be gathered together and buried again. "Whom they have loved": Whereas they ought to have loved the Lord their God, and Him only. It means an idolatrous love of and affection for them; and not the love of them, as objects for use and delight. Otherwise the light of the sun, moon, and stars, is splendid, and their influence great; and a pleasant thing it is to behold them, and especially the sun, the fountain of light and heat. “And whom they have served”: more and besides the Creator, whom they should have served, the Lord of hosts, and Him only. "And after whom they have walked": Not in the natural and literal sense, but in a religious one, as is next explained. "And whom they have sought": For advice and counsel, and by making their prayers and supplications to them. 1 "And whom they have worshipped": By bowing the knee. By offering sacrifices, and burning incense, and putting up petitions to them. By trusting in them, and expecting good things from them (2 Kings 21:3). “They shall not be gathered, nor be buried”: Meaning, the bones that are brought out of the graves, having been scattered about, would not be collected together again, or replaced in their sepulchers. “They shall be for dung upon the face of the earth”: That is, they shall lie and rot upon the face of the earth, and crumble into dust, and become dung for the earth (see Psalm 83:10). The reason God allowed this, was so they could be placed in front of all these things they had worshipped falsely. It was to show that the sun, moon, and stars, and all the idols of false worship had no power to revive them. They were left to decay. Their bodies came from the earth and they would decay and return to that earth. Jeremiah 8:3 "And death shall be chosen rather than life by all the residue of them that remain of this evil family, which remain in all the places whither I have driven them, saith the LORD of hosts." By them that should be alive in those times, who would be carried captive into other lands. And be exploited and made to suffer greatly, by the nations among whom they should dwell (see Rev. 9:6). The Septuagint version, and those that follow it, make this to be a reason of the former, reading the words thus, "because they have chosen death rather than life" (see Deut. 30:19). But the other sense is best, which is confirmed by what follows: "By all the residue of them that remain of this evil family": The nation of the Jews has become very corrupt and degenerate. So, the people of Israel are referred to as an “evil family” (Amos 3:1). Now it is foretold, that those which remained of that people, who died not by famine, or were not slain by the sword. Yet should be in such a miserable condition, as that death would be more preferred to them than life. "Which remain in all the places whither I have driven them, saith the LORD of hosts": For, though they were carried captive by men, yet it was the LORD’s doing, and a just punishment upon them for their sins. Even the fate of the dead was better than the fate of those left living. They would be taken into a foreign country as slaves. Death would have been welcomed. Notice again, this judgement is from God. Jeremiah 8:4 "Moreover thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the LORD; Shall they fall, and not arise? shall he turn away, and not return?" Jeremiah spoke of the natural instinct of one who falls, to get up, and one who leaves, to return, but Judah did not possess this instinct. 2 These people had not just committed a single sin against God. They had taken on the sinful way of life. They were not repentant at all. God may turn away from them for a moment because He cannot bear to look upon sin, but He is always ready to accept their repentance. It is not a natural thing for a person to fall and not get back up. This can be in the spirit as well as in the flesh. God will help them arise if they repent and turn to Him. Jeremiah 8:5 "Why [then] is this people of Jerusalem slidden back by a perpetual backsliding? they hold fast deceit, they refuse to return." These people fell into sin, and rose not again by repentance. They turn away from the good ways of God and religion, and return not again. They backslide from and revolt against the LORD, and they continue in their revolt and rebellion. Their backsliding is an everlasting one; there is no hope of their repentance and recovery. It is a vehement and passionate expostulation about the people of the Jews, founded upon the former general observation, showing them to be the worst of all people. It is a common saying, "it is a long lane that has no turning". But these people, having departed from the Lord, return no more. A very learned man renders the words, "why does Jerusalem turn away this people with an obstinate aversion?" that is, the rulers and governors of Jerusalem, as in Matt. 23:37. Or rather thus, "why does a stubborn aversion turn away this people, O Jerusalem?" And so, they are an address to the magistrates and inhabitants of Jerusalem. "They hold fast deceit": Practice it, and continue in the practice of it, both with God and man. "They refuse to return": To the LORD, to His worship, and to the right ways of holiness and truth, from whence they had erred (see Jer. 5:3). (See note on 2:19). The word "perpetual" tells it all. They have continued in sin. Their backsliding is not for a moment but is a continuous thing. They have deliberately rejected the God of their Fathers. They should see the error of their ways and turn back to God. They are too stubborn to ask for God's help. They cling to their belief in false gods. They have believed a lie. Verses 6-7: Unlike birds, whose instincts guide them to know the seasons (“appointed times”), and fly in the right direction, the people did not have enough sense to discern “the judgment of the LORD” and treat it as a reason to repent and change their ways. Jeremiah 8:6 "I hearkened and heard, [but] they spake not aright: no man repented him of his wickedness, saying, What have I done? Every one turned to his course, as the horse rusheth into the battle." God, before passing sentence, carefully listens to the words of the people; compare Gen. 11:5, where the divine judgment is preceded by the Almighty going down to see the tower. 3 "Not aright": Or, "not-right;" which in the Hebrew idiom means that which is utterly wrong. "No man repented": The original phrase is very striking: “No man had pity upon his own wickedness." If men understood the true nature of sin, the sinner would repent out of immense pity upon himself. "As the horse rusheth": Literally, "overfloweth." It is a double metaphor; first, the persistence of the people in sin is compared to the fury which at the sound of the trumpet seizes upon the war- horse. And then its rush into the battle is likened to the overflowing of a torrent, which nothing can stop in its destructive course.
Recommended publications
  • The Prophet Jeremiah As Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiahâ•Š
    Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 11-2010 The Prophet Jeremiah as Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiah” Gary E. Yates Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E., "The Prophet Jeremiah as Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiah”" (2010). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 372. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/372 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ETS, Atlanta 2010 “The Prophet Jeremiah as Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiah” Gary E. Yates, Ph.D. Introduction Timothy Polk has noted, “Nothing distinguishes the book of Jeremiah from earlier works of prophecy quite so much as the attention it devotes to the person of the prophet and the prominence it accords the prophetic ‘I’, and few things receive more scholarly comment.”1 More than simply providing a biographical or psychological portrait of the prophet, the book presents Jeremiah as a theological symbol who embodies in his person the word of Yahweh and the office of prophet. 2 In fact, the figure of Jeremiah is so central that a theology of the book of Jeremiah “cannot be formulated without taking into account the person of the prophet, as the book presents him.”3 The purpose of this study is to explore how Jeremiah the person functions as a theological symbol and what these motifs contribute to the overall theology of the book of Jeremiah.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremiah Commentary
    YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE JEREMIAH BOB UTLEY PROFESSOR OF HERMENEUTICS (BIBLE INTERPRETATION) STUDY GUIDE COMMENTARY SERIES OLD TESTAMENT, VOL. 13A BIBLE LESSONS INTERNATIONAL MARSHALL, TEXAS 2012 www.BibleLessonsIntl.com www.freebiblecommentary.org Copyright ©2001 by Bible Lessons International, Marshall, Texas (Revised 2006, 2012) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any way or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. Bible Lessons International P. O. Box 1289 Marshall, TX 75671-1289 1-800-785-1005 ISBN 978-1-892691-45-3 The primary biblical text used in this commentary is: New American Standard Bible (Update, 1995) Copyright ©1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation P. O. Box 2279 La Habra, CA 90632-2279 The paragraph divisions and summary captions as well as selected phrases are from: 1. The New King James Version, Copyright ©1979, 1980, 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 2. The New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, Copyright ©1989 by the Division of Christian Education of National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U. S. A. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 3. Today’s English Version is used by permission of the copyright owner, The American Bible Society, ©1966, 1971. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 4. The New Jerusalem Bible, copyright ©1990 by Darton, Longman & Todd, Ltd. and Doubleday, a division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.freebiblecommentary.org The New American Standard Bible Update — 1995 Easier to read: } Passages with Old English “thee’s” and “thou’s” etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parallel German-English Texts, with Annotations
    Christmas Oratorio (BWV 248) This work was first rendered during the Christmas season of 1734-35 in the main churches of Leipzig. Part I on Saturday, 25 December, at the morning service in the St. Nicholas Church, and at vespers in the St. Thomas Church; Part II on Sunday, 26 December, at the morning service in the St. Thomas Church, and at vespers in the St. Nicholas Church; Part III on Monday, 27 December, in the St. Nicholas Church; Part IV on Saturday, 1 January, at the morning service in the St. Thomas Church, and at vespers in the St. Nicholas Church; Part V on Sunday, 2 January, in the St. Nicholas Church; and Part VI on Thursday, 6 January, at the morning service in the St. Thomas Church, and at vespers in the St. Nicholas Church. There are some revisions entered into Bach's score and performing parts for later renderings, but we do not know in which years these were made. A traversal through all six parts is possible for the Christmas seasons of 1739-40,1744-45, and 1745-46, since the series of festival days then were the same as for 1734-35. Possibly individual cantatas from the set were rendered in various years. In any event, the libretto appears to have been left unchanged. (In years that the Christmas Oratorio was not rendered, Bach performed various liturgically appropriate cantatas that did not form into an oratorio cycle.) [Part I] First Festival Day in Christmas [1] CHORUS Jauchzet, frohlocket, auf, preiset Shout, exult, arise, praise the die Tage, days [of Christmas], Riihmet, was heute der Hochste glorify what the Most
    [Show full text]
  • The Suffering of the Prophet Jeremiah
    MINISTRY The Suffering of the Prophet Jeremiah Drs. H. Lalleman-de Winkel graduated from Utrecht State University, taking Old Testament as her main subject. She wrote a thesis on Medical Metaphors in the Book of Jeremiah, and ·continues research on that book. We live in a remarkable time. In our western world with its Biographical Sections. material prosperity we can get almost everything we want. Even In those parts of the book which tell of Jeremiah' s life, what we if not all are rich, generally speaking we have more than we really read in the story of his call is developed: his message ofjudgment need. Yet even in our modern world money cannot buy freedom is not accepted with enthusiasm; indeed the story has been called from sorrow and suffering. So many books are written on this a 'passion narrative'. Let us consider some of these reports which theme nowadays, (for instance the book by Harold S. Kushner relate to Jeremiah's suffering. When bad things happen to good people•), along with books about: how to be healthy, successful in business, etc. Suffering Jeremiah 20: 1-2 describes how Jeremiah is captured by the chief does not agree with our success, and so it hardly figures in our officer in the temple, Pashhur; he is considered a disturber of the thinking. The book of Jeremiah offers one model of suffering. peace (cf. 29:26, apparently this happened more often). People Even if the suffering of Jeremiah has certain specific meanings take offence at his message of judgment, he is beaten and put in which do not apply to suffering in general, some analogies with a kind of straitjacket.
    [Show full text]
  • “Is There No Balm in Gilead?”
    August 5, 2012 Pentecost 10 “Is There No Balm In Gilead?” JEREMIAH 8:18-9:1 my Comforter in sorrow, my heart is faint within me. 19 Listen to the cry of O my people from a land far away: “Is the LORD not in Zion? Is her King no longer there?” “Why have they provoked me to anger with their images, with their worthless foreign idols?” 20 “The harvest is past, the summer has ended, and we are not saved.” 21 Since my people are crushed, I am crushed; I mourn, and horror grips me. 22 Is there no balm in Gilead? Is there no physician there? Why then is there no healing for the wound of my people? 9:1 Oh, that my head were a spring of water and my eyes a fountain of tears! I would weep day and night for the slain of my people. The prophet Jeremiah has been called the weeping prophet and rightly so. He says in the words just read to you, “Oh, that my head were a spring of water and my eyes a fountain of tears.” Here is a man, a grown man, a prophet of the Lord, shedding copious tears for the people of Judah and Jerusalem because of their rejection of the Lord. When Jeremiah walked the streets of Jerusalem in the morning he smelled the familiar smells of animal sacrifices offered to the Lord that pictured the great sacrifice Jesus would give on the cross for our sin. When he walked the streets in the evening he could smell the sweet smelling incense the people burned to Baal and Ashtoreth as they sat on their flat roofs and looked up to the stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45
    Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 6-2005 Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45 Gary E. Yates Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E., "Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45" (2005). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 5. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 48/2 (June 2005) 263-81 NARRATIVE PARALLELISM AND THE "JEHOIAKIM FRAME": A READING STRATEGY FOR JEREMIAH 26-45 GARY E. YATES* I. INTRODUCTION Many attempting to make sense of prophetic literature in the Hebrew Bible would echo Carroll's assessment that "[t]o the modern reader the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel are virtually incomprehensible as books."1 For Carroll, the problem with reading these books as "books" is that there is a confusing mixture of prose and poetry, a lack of coherent order and arrange­ ment, and a shortage of necessary contextual information needed for accu­ rate interpretation.2 Despite the difficult compositional and historical issues associated with the book of Jeremiah, there is a growing consensus that
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Zechariah, Volume 2
    EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 VOLUME ZECHARIAH, EXPLORING is second volume of Mark J. Boda’s two-volume set on Zechariah showcases a series of studies tracing the impact of earlier Hebrew Bible traditions on various passages and sections of the book of Zechariah, including 1:7–6:15; 1:1–6 and 7:1–8:23; and 9:1–14:21. e collection of these slightly revised previously published essays leads readers along the argument that Boda has been developing over the past decade. EXPLORING MARK J. BODA is Professor of Old Testament at McMaster Divinity College. He is the author of ten books, including e Book of Zechariah ZECHARIAH, (Eerdmans) and Haggai and Zechariah Research: A Bibliographic Survey (Deo), and editor of seventeen volumes. VOLUME 2 The Development and Role of Biblical Traditions in Zechariah Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Boda Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-201-0) available at http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/Books_ANEmonographs.aspx Cover photo: Zev Radovan/BibleLandPictures.com Mark J. Boda Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 ANCIENT NEAR EAST MONOGRAPHS Editors Alan Lenzi Juan Manuel Tebes Editorial Board Reinhard Achenbach C. L. Crouch Esther J. Hamori Chistopher B. Hays René Krüger Graciela Gestoso Singer Bruce Wells Number 17 EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 The Development and Role of Biblical Traditions in Zechariah by Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremiah 8:8: Why Are Scribes Accused of Corrupting The
    H.L. Bosman Faculty of Theology, JEREMIAH 8:8: WHY Stellenbosch University, ARE SCRIBES ACCUSED South Africa. OF CORRUPTING E-mail: [email protected] THE TORAH? DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.18820/23099089/ ABSTRACT actat.Sup26.7 Why are scribes accused, in Jeremiah 8:8-9, of corrupting ISSN 1015-8758 (Print) the “tôrāh”? The article contemplates possible answers ISSN 2309-9089 (Online) to this question against the background of what is presupposed in the Book of Jeremiah with regards to Acta Theologica 2018 “tôrāh” and being a scribe. Does this confront one with Suppl 26:118-135 a response triggered by the reformation of Josiah (older © Creative Commons interpretation) or by an indication of what took place much With Attribution (CC-BY) later during the gradual combination of Torah and Nebi’im as authoritative scripture in Persian and Hellenistic times (recent interpretation)? The article distinguishes between oral common law and written statutory law, in order to rectify anachronistic interpretations of all biblical laws as statutory laws (Berman 2014). The change from oral to written law, facilitated by the scribes, caused a legitimacy crisis and can be explained against the background of a new understanding of what “word of God” or “revelation” entailed (Van der Toorn 2013). 1. INTRODUCTION While reflecting on what might be an appropriate topic for this Festschrift, I assumed that the link between prophecy, the law and wisdom might be of some interest to Fanie Snyman, given his longstanding interest in Malachi and post-exilic prophecy. The decision to focus on Jeremiah 8:8 was triggered by the fact that there are only two references in the Old Testament where scribes are identified as writers of biblical texts and both of them are in the Book of Jeremiah (8:8-9; 36:18).
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on the Book of Ezekiel by Pastor Galen L
    A Commentary on the Book of Ezekiel By Pastor Galen L. Doughty Southside Christian Church December 2014 INTRODUCTION: This commentary is based upon my personal devotional notes and reflections on the Book of Ezekiel. It is intended to help you better understand some of the background and issues in Ezekiel’s prophecy. It is not a technical commentary designed for academic projects. This material is intended for use by members and friends of Southside Christian Church, especially our Life Group leaders to help you lead your group in a verse by verse study of Ezekiel. However, I do not include discussion questions in the commentary. That I leave up to you as a group leader. In the commentary there are occasional references to the original Hebrew words Ezekiel used in a particular passage. Those Hebrew words are always quoted in italics and are transliterated into English from the Hebrew. I go chapter by chapter in the commentary and sometimes individual verses are commented upon, sometimes it is several sentences and sometimes a whole paragraph. This commentary is based on the New International Version and all Scripture quotations are taken from that version of the Bible. Books of the Bible, Scripture references and quotes are also italicized. KEY HISTORICAL DATES IN THE TIMELINE OF EZEKIEL: King Jehoiachim of Judah becomes a Babylonian vassal, 605. Jehoiachim rebels against Nebuchadnezzar; he sends troops to raid and punish Jehoiachim, 602. Nebuchadnezzar deports some Jews to Babylon from Jerusalem including a young man named Daniel, 602. Jehoiachim dies and is replaced by his son Jehoiachin; he reigns three months, 598.
    [Show full text]
  • JEREMIAH 8 Vs 1 KJV-Lite™ VERSES
    JEREMIAH 8 vs 1 KJV-lite™ VERSES www.ilibros.net/KJV-lite.html How do we honor the greatest Father? The loving Father of our Lord Jesus Christ was the theme and topic and focus of the Son… all the days He walked among us. Of His Father, He never spoke an unkind word, never a hint of hurt or harm did He associate with His Name; certainly all the books ever written could never exhaust the magnitude of His mercy, His grace, and His loving kindness toward us; while for countless centuries… He receives our complaints, our ingratitude and our censure. In the 3 previous verses, Jeremiah told us of many unspeakable things… both Israel = ruled by God and Judah = the praise God were doing with great regularity; nauseating things that NEVER were required, and NEVER entered into the mind of the LORD God. So let’s review, and remember: so we NEVER forget. Tophet… means: fireplace… / but not the warm, cozy place to gather round with hot chocolate… oftentimes referred to as: high places; in Hebrew, boshet… meaning: a shameful thing. Tophet -- is where young king Josiah purged the land of detestable pagan practices to Baal; The fireplace was located in the Valley of Ben Hinnom, called: the Valley of the Children of Hinnom, mentioned in Joshua, associated with the Jebusite people who occupied the area surrounding Jerusalem; to know their history, is to know why God wanted them destroyed! later the Valley of Hinnom became known as: Gehenna… (in Greek: geenna, always translated hell); the garbage dump of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Sitting in the Gap Study Guide – September 22, 2019 Jeremiah 8:18-9:1
    Sitting in the Gap Study Guide – September 22, 2019 Jeremiah 8:18-9:1 (Click on scripture above to link directly to each passage in the NRSV on biblegateway.com.) Suggested Study / Prep 1. Read the passage(s) in several different translations and/or paraphrases (e.g. NRSV and The Message) 2. Read the provided commentary(s) below 3. Visit and explore some of the additional resources links (and/or explore your own commentaries, resources, etc) 4. Reflect on the provided questions 5. Generate your own questions and “wonderings” Commentary on Jeremiah 8:18-9:1 (From Homiletics; “Have a Good Cry”, September 22, 2019) The book of Jeremiah presents its interpreters with a range of challenges stemming primarily from its severely damaged text and the extensive editing which the book has undergone in the course of its transmission history. (The Septuagint version of Jeremiah, for example, made several centuries B.C., is approximately an eighth shorter than the Masoretic Text [MT] of Jeremiah, which is the text used by modern translators. The discovery of fragments of Jeremiah among the Dead Sea Scrolls has led most scholars to conclude that there were at least two Hebrew traditions of the book, one considerably shorter than the other.) These challenges make even the most basic Jeremianic interpretive tasks uncertain. Determining the boundaries of a “reading” from Jeremiah, for example, is by no means obvious. The lectionary’s choice for today’s reading, 8:18– 9:1, is one possibility. Verse 9:1 in English is verse 8:23 in Hebrew (see the text note in NRSV), so the reading consists of the last six verses of the eighth chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • A Text-Critical Analysis of the Lamentations Manuscripts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stellenbosch University SUNScholar Repository AText-criticalAnalysisoftheLamentationsManuscripts fromQumran(3QLam,4QLam,5QLam aand5QLam b) EstablishingthecontentofanOldTestamentbookaccordingtoits textualwitnessesamongtheDeadSeascrolls by GideonR.Kotzé DissertationpresentedinfulfilmentoftherequirementsforthedegreeDoctorofTheology(Old Testament)attheUniversityofStellenbosch Promoters: Prof.LouisJonker FacultyofTheology DiscplineGroupOldandNewTestament Prof.JohannCook FacultyofArtsandSocialSciences DeptofAncientStudies March2011 Declaration Bysubmittingthisdissertationelectronically, I declarethattheentirety ofthework contained thereinismyown,originalwork, thatIamthesoleauthorthereof(savetotheextentexplicitly otherwisestated),thatreproductionandpublicationthereofbyStellenboschUniversitywillnot infringeanythirdpartyrightsandthatIhavenotpreviouslyinitsentiretyorinpartsubmittedit forobtaininganyqualification. Date:15February2011 Copyright©2011StellenboschUniversity Allrightsreserved ii Summary This study takes as its point of departure the contributions of the Dead Sea scrolls to the disciplineofOldTestamenttextualcriticism.Itdealswithaparticularapproachtothisdiscipline and its application to the four Lamentations manuscripts from Qumran (3QLam, 4QLam, 5QLam aand5QLam b).TheapproachtoOldTestamenttextualcriticismfollowedinthestudy treatstheQumranmanuscriptsofLamentations,theMasoretictextandtheancienttranslationsas witnessestothecontentofthebookandnotmerelyaswitnessestoearlierformsofitsHebrew
    [Show full text]