Spindle Checkpoint Function Is Required for Mitotic Catastrophe Induced by DNA-Damaging Agents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spindle Checkpoint Function Is Required for Mitotic Catastrophe Induced by DNA-Damaging Agents Oncogene (2004) 23, 6548–6558 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9232/04 $30.00 www.nature.com/onc Spindle checkpoint function is required for mitotic catastrophe induced by DNA-damaging agents Masayuki Nitta1,2,3, Osamu Kobayashi1,2,3, Shinobu Honda1, Toru Hirota1, Shinji Kuninaka1, Tomotoshi Marumoto1, Yukitaka Ushio2 and Hideyuki Saya*,1 1Department of Tumor Genetics and Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Kumamoto, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan; 2Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan Mitotic catastrophe is an important mechanism for the ments such as chemotherapy and radiation. Most cancer induction of cell death in cancer cells by antineoplastic cells are deficient in G1 checkpoint function and agents that damage DNA. This process is facilitated by therefore fail to arrest in G1 phase on exposure to geno- defects in the G1 and G2 checkpoints of the cell cycle that toxic agents. Instead, they accumulate temporarily in are apparent in most cancer cells and which allow the cells G2 phase. However, given that the G2 checkpoint is to enter mitosis with DNA damage. We have now also partially impaired in cancer cells, they are unable characterized the dynamics of mitotic catastrophe induced to maintain G2 arrest and eventually die as they enter by DNA-damaging agents in p53-deficient cancer cells. mitosis (Fingert et al., 1986; Chan et al., 1999). This Cells that entered mitosis with DNA damage transiently process is known as mitotic catastrophe or mitotic death arrested at metaphase for more than 10 h without (Chan et al., 1999; Roninson et al., 2001). segregation of chromosomes and subsequently died Downregulation or inhibition of G2 checkpoint directly from metaphase. In those metaphase arrested proteins, including p53, p21, and 14-3-3, induces G2 precatastrophic cells, anaphase-promoting complex ap- checkpoint abrogation and subsequent catastrophic peared to be inactivated and BubR1 was persistently death in response to DNA damage (Bunz et al., 1998; localized at kinetochores, suggesting that spindle check- Chan et al., 1999, 2000). A new strategy has therefore point is activated after the DNA damage. Furthermore, been developed to sensitize cancer cells to the effects suppression of spindle checkpoint function by BubR1 or of genotoxic agents with the use of small molecules that Mad2RNA interference in the DNA damaged cells led inhibit the induction of G2 arrest by DNA damage to escape from catastrophic death and to subsequent (Sausville et al., 2001). The induction of mitotic abnormal mitosis. Dysfunction of the spindle checkpoint catastrophe is thus an important goal of cancer in p53-deficient cancer cells is thus likely a critical factor therapies using DNA-damaging agents. However, mito- in resistance to DNA-damaging therapeutic agents. tic catastrophe has been characterized mostly by Oncogene (2004) 23, 6548–6558. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207873 morphological observations, with the underlying mole- Published online 28 June 2004 cular mechanism remaining largely unknown in human cells. Keywords: mitotic catastrophe; spindle checkpoint; The spindle checkpoint inhibits the activity of the DNA damage; p53; time lapse; BubR1 anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and blocks the transition from metaphase to anaphase until all chromosomes are aligned at the metaphase plate and achieve bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle, thus Introduction ensuring accurate sister chromatid segregation during cell division. Impairment of spindle checkpoint function Cell cycle checkpoints prevent transition from one phase results in premature mitosis and missegregation of of the cell cycle to the next until all processes of the chromosomes, leading to aneuploidy (Michel et al., present phase are completed. Defects in the checkpoint 2001). The signal activating spindle checkpoint is functions result in gene mutations and chromosome supposed to be generated from kinetochores that either damages, which contribute to the development and fail to bind spindle microtubules or are not experiencing progression of tumors. However, loss of checkpoint the tension that normally results from bipolar attach- function in some cancer cells is considered to be ment to the spindle. Several proteins that localize to associated with their sensitivity to antineoplastic treat- kinetochores, including Mad1, Mad2, BubR1 (Mad3), Bub1, Bub3, and Mps1, contribute to generation of the spindle checkpoint signal. Recent observations have *Correspondence: H Saya; E-mail: [email protected] 3These authors contributed equally to this work shown that cells having spindle checkpoint abnormal- Received 6 February 2004; revised 26 April 2004; accepted 26 April 2004; ities are insensitive to Taxol, a spindle poison (O’Con- published online 28 June 2004 nor et al., 2002; Anand et al., 2003). However, in case of Mitotic catastrophe in cancer cells M Nitta et al 6549 DNA-damaging agents, it is largely unknown whether phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine-139 (Ro- dysfunction of the spindle checkpoint correlates with the gakou et al., 1998), which then results in the formation ineffectiveness of these drugs aimed at inducing mitotic of g-H2AX complexes that can be detected by the catastrophe. antibodies (Rogakou et al., 1999). Given that DBSs We have now characterized the dynamics of mitotic are introduced in cells even in an ordinary cultured catastrophe induced by DNA damage in p53-deficient condition (Haber, 1999), the g-H2AX complexes were cancer cells. Most cells entering mitosis with DNA detected in a small population of cultured cells. damage arrested at metaphase and subsequently under- However, treatment with aphidicolin induced a marked went cell death. Furthermore, metaphase arrest prior increase in the number of g-H2AX-positive spots to the catastrophe was clearly shown to result from the apparent in the nuclei of both p53 þ / þ and p53À/À activation of the spindle checkpoint, and inhibition of HCT116 cells in G2 phase (Figure 1d, left and right checkpoint function using RNA interference allowed panels). In addition, multiple g-H2AX-positive spots cancer cells to escape mitotic catastrophe. Our findings were detected on the chromosomes of p53À/À cells that demonstrate that DNA damage can activate spindle subsequently entered mitosis (Figure 1d, right panel). checkpoint in cells with impaired G2 checkpoint Exposure to ionizing radiation at G2 phase, which function in a way where persistent kinetochore localiza- also induces DNA damage, showed effects similar to tion of BubR1 seems to have a critical role. The spindle those of aphidicolin treatment in p53 þ / þ and p53À/À checkpoint function is thus required for the induction of HCT116 cells. The cells were synchronized in G0 phase catastrophe in cancer cells treated with DNA-damaging by serum deprivation, returned to serum-containing antineoplastic agents. medium and, after 12 h, exposed to 20Gy of X- radiation. The p53À/À cells entered mitosis after a transient G2 delay and underwent cell death (see Supplemental Figure 1). Results Aphidicolin induced the expression of both p53 and p21 proteins in p53 þ / þ HCT116 cells, but no p53 and Loss of G2 checkpoint function results in mitotic cell death À/À after DNA damage very little p21 proteins in p53 cells (Figure 1e and f). Consistent with previous observations (Bunz et al., Cancer cells with impaired G2 checkpoint exhibit an 1998, 1999), these results suggest that the failure to increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, to which induce sufficient expression of p21 in the p53-deficient they respond by undergoing mitotic death (Bunz et al., cells results in G2 checkpoint abrogation. To confirm 1999; Borel et al., 2002). We established a system to that the death of p53À/À HCT116 cells treated with investigate mitotic death in response to DNA damage. aphidicolin occurs during mitosis, we blocked the G2–M To avoid the effect of G1 checkpoint, we used transition in these cells by exposure to butyrolactone I, aphidicolin to induce DNA damage. This drug, at which specifically inhibits the activity of cyclin-depen- concentrations between 0.3 and 1.0 mg/ml, inhibits DNA dent kinase 1 (Cdk1), 24 h after the onset of aphidicolin polymerases a, d,ande, and thereby induces a treatment. Butyrolactone I (50 mM) induced G2 arrest prolonged stall in DNA replication that prevents its and significantly suppressed cell death (see Supplemen- completion (Borel et al., 2002). The resulting gaps in the tal Figure 2). These results thus indicate that cells having double-stranded DNA are recognized as DNA strand DNA damage with impaired G2 checkpoint undergo cell breaks (Toledo et al., 2000) and activate the DNA death after they enter mitosis. þ / þ damage-induced G2 checkpoint. We treated p53 and À/À p53 HCT116 human colon cancer cells with aphidi- DNA damage induces metaphase arrest and subsequent colin (0.5 mg/ml) and examined cell cycle distribution by death in p53-deficient cells flow cytometry. Both p53 þ / þ and p53À/À cells transiently arrested at S phase and subsequently entered G2 phase We next analysed the dynamics of mitotic catastrophe þ / þ (Figure 1a). The p53 cells arrested in G2 phase and triggered by aphidicolin-induced DNA damage. To did not enter mitosis, whereas the p53À/À cells were facilitate visualization of the kinetics of chromosomes À/À unable to maintain G2 arrest and entered mitosis (Figure in living cells, we used HeLa and p53 HCT116 cells 1a and b). Furthermore, less than 15% of p53 þ / þ cells that stably express green fluorescent protein (GFP)- treated with aphidicolin for 96 h underwent cell death tagged histone H2B. Time-lapse fluorescence and (Figure 1c). In contrast, B50% of p53À/À cells under- differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy went cell death after entry into mitosis. Similar to p53À/À using GFP-HH2B-expressing HeLa cells revealed that HCT116 cells, HeLa cells, in which the p53 is cells undergo mitotic catastrophe in three phases functionally inactivated by human papilloma virus-E6, (Table 1, Figure 2a, Supplemental video 1).
Recommended publications
  • Epithelial Cell Death Analysis of Cell Cycle by Flow Cytometry White Paper
    Epithelial Cell Death Analysis of Cell Cycle by Flow Cytometry White Paper Authors: Savithri Balasubramanian, John Tigges, Vasilis Toxavidis, Heidi Mariani. Affiliation: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Stem Cell Institute a Beckman Coulter Life Sciences: Epithelial Cell Death Analysis of Cell Cycle by Flow Cytometry PRINCIPAL OF TECHNIQUE Background: Cell cycle, or cell-division cycle, is the series of events that takes place in a cell leading to its division and duplication (replication). In cells without a nucleus (prokaryotic), cell cycle occurs via a process termed binary fission. In cells with a nucleus (eukaryotes), cell cycle can be divided in two brief periods: interphase—during which the cell grows, accumulating nutrients needed for mitosis and duplicating its DNA—and the mitosis (M) phase, during which the cell splits itself into two distinct cells, often called «daughter cells». Cell-division cycle is a vital process by which a single-celled fertilized egg develops into a mature organism, as well as the process by which hair, skin, blood cells, and some internal organs are renewed. Cell cycle consists of four distinct phases: G1 phase, S phase (synthesis), G2 phase (collectively known as interphase) and M phase (mitosis). M phase is itself composed of two tightly coupled processes: mitosis, in which the cell’s chromosomes are divided between the two daughter cells, and cytokinesis, in which the cell’s cytoplasm divides in half forming distinct cells. Activation of each phase is dependent on the proper progression and completion of the previous one. Cells that have temporarily or reversibly stopped dividing are said to have entered a state of quiescence called G0 phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Recruitment of Leukemic Cells from G 0 Phase of the Cell Cycle By
    Leukemia (2003) 17, 2049–2059 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/leu CORRESPONDENCE Recruitment of leukemic cells from G0 phase of the cell cycle by interferons results in conversion of resistance to daunorubicin Leukemia (2003) 17, 2049–2051. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2403085 were not affected by daunorubicin-induced cell death. To analyze whether a similar cell cycle-specific sensitivity to Ara-C TO THE EDITOR and daunorubicin was observed in other leukemic cell lines, we analyzed four acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines and one Although the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia CML blast crisis cell line, which were generated in our (AML) responds to initial treatment, relapse of the disease occurs laboratory by culturing of leukemic blasts from five different in a significant percentage of these patients.1 The cell cycle patients in serum-free medium at high cell concentrations until status of leukemic cells may play an important role in the spontaneous sustained proliferation of the leukemic cells response to treatment of leukemic cells. Especially, the broadly occurred. These cell lines cytogenetically and phenotypically used cytotoxic agent Cytarabine (Ara-C) has been demonstrated resembled the primary leukemia. Figure 1b shows the median to exert its action via intercalation into the DNA of cells cell cycle distribution within these cell lines after incubation for À6 specifically in the S phase of the cell cycle, and sensitivity to this 48 h in medium alone, or in medium containing 1 Â 10 M Ara- agent is therefore described to be specific for cells in active cell C or daunorubicin.
    [Show full text]
  • P53 Phosphorylation and Association with Murine Double Minute 2, C-Jun
    [CANCER RESEARCH 60, 896–900, February 15, 2000] Advances in Brief p53 Phosphorylation and Association with Murine Double Minute 2, c-Jun ARF NH2-Terminal Kinase, p14 , and p300/CBP during the Cell Cycle and after Exposure to Ultraviolet Irradiation1 Thomas Buschmann, Victor Adler, Ekaterina Matusevich, Serge Y. Fuchs, and Ze’ev Ronai2 Ruttenberg Cancer Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029 Abstract though the mechanisms underlying the ability of p53 to elicit such opposing effects are yet to be identified, independent studies point to p53 phosphorylation and association with proteins is implicated in its a different set of p53 regulators and effectors that are affected by p53 stability and activity. We have compared the association of DNA-bound in each of these scenarios. and overall pools of p53 with murine double minute 2 (Mdm2), c-Jun NH -terminal kinase (JNK), p300/CBP, and p14ARF during cell cycle In studying the regulation of p53 stability, we demonstrated previ- 2 ously that, in Swiss 3T3 cells, JNK and Mdm2 target p53 degradation progression. Whereas DNA-bound p53 associates with JNK at G0-G1 and in different phases of the cell cycle (7). In this study, we have with Mdm2 and p300 during S and G2-M phases, the general pool of p53 was found in complex with JNK and Mdm2 almost throughout the cell compared the association of subpopulations of p53 with proteins cycle. Phosphorylation of p53 at serines 9, 15, and 20 is at the highest levels implicated in stability and activity of p53 and monitored the pattern of at G1 and at serines 37 and 392 during G2-M phase.
    [Show full text]
  • A P53-Responsive Mirna Network Promotes Cancer Cell Quiescence Ting La1, Guang Zhi Liu2, Margaret Farrelly1, Nicole Cole3, Yu Chen Feng1, Yuan Yuan Zhang1, Simonne K
    Published OnlineFirst October 9, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1886 Cancer Tumor Biology and Immunology Research A p53-Responsive miRNA Network Promotes Cancer Cell Quiescence Ting La1, Guang Zhi Liu2, Margaret Farrelly1, Nicole Cole3, Yu Chen Feng1, Yuan Yuan Zhang1, Simonne K. Sherwin1, Hamed Yari1, Hessam Tabatabaee1, Xu Guang Yan1, Su Tang Guo4, Tao Liu5, Rick F. Thorne2,6, Lei Jin7, and Xu Dong Zhang1,2 Abstract Cancer cells in quiescence (G0 phase) are resistant to miRNA-455-3p targeted CDK2-associated cullin domain 1 death, and re-entry of quiescent cancer cells into the cell- (CAC1), which enhanced CDK2-mediated phosphorylation cycle plays an important role in cancer recurrence. Here we of p27 necessary for its polyubiquitination. Of note, the show that two p53-responsive miRNAs utilize distinct but gene encoding miRNA-27b-3p was embedded in the intron complementary mechanisms to promote cancer cell quies- of the chromosome 9 open reading frame 3 gene that was cence by facilitating stabilization of p27. Purified quiescent transcriptionally activated by p53. Similarly, the host gene B16 mouse melanoma cells expressed higher levels of of miRNA-455-3p, collagen alpha-1 (XXVII) chain, was also a miRNA-27b-3p and miRNA-455-3p relative to their prolif- p53 transcriptional target. Collectively, our results identify erating counterparts. Induction of quiescence resulted in miRNA-27b-3p and miRNA-455-3p as important regulators increased levels of these miRNAs in diverse types of human of cancer cell quiescence in response to p53 and suggest that cancer cell lines. Inhibition of miRNA-27b-3p or miRNA- manipulating miRNA-27b-3p and miRNA-455-3p may con- 455-3p reduced, whereas its overexpression increased, the stitute novel therapeutic avenues for improving outcomes of proportion of quiescent cells in the population, indicating cancer treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor and Tumor Suppressor Locus P16/INK4A- P14arf and Regulation of the Transition Into and out of the Cell Cycle
    The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor and Tumor Suppressor Locus p16/INK4A- p14ARF and Regulation of the Transition Into and Out of the Cell Cycle by Payal Agarwal A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 7, 2012 Copyright, 2011 by Payal Agarwal Approved by Richard C. Bird, Chair, Professor of Pathobiology Bruce F. Smith, Professor of Pathobiology Frederik W. van Ginkel, Associate Professor of Pathobiology Anthony G. Moss, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Abstract p16/INK4A/CDKN2A is an important tumor suppressor gene located in the INK4A/ARF locus, which encodes a 16 kDa protein known as p16, and a 14 kDa protein known as p14ARF in humans. p16 arrests cell cycle in early G1 phase thereby inhibiting the binding of cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 with cyclinD1. This leaves the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) tumor suppressor hypo-phosphorylated and S phase transcription factor E2F bound and inactive. p14ARF expression up-regulates cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21, which inhibits the G1/S phase transition by stabilizing p53 expression upon disassociation from mdm2. We hypothesized that p16 has a role in exit from the cell cycle, becomes defective in cancer cells and has binding partners other than CDK4/CDK6 in quiescent or differentiated cells when their canonical target proteins are thought to be nonfunctional. We have hypothesized that INK4A/ARF encoded proteins perform important regulatory roles that are defective in canine mammary cancer and may cause loss of differentiation potential. Well characterized p16-defective canine mammary cancer cell lines, normal canine fibroblasts, and CMT-derived p16-transfected CMT cell clones, are used to investigate expression of p16 after serum starvation into quiescence followed by re-feeding to induce cell cycle re-entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Exit from Quiescence Displays a Memory of Cell Growth and Division
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00367-0 OPEN Exit from quiescence displays a memory of cell growth and division Xia Wang1,2, Kotaro Fujimaki1, Geoffrey C. Mitchell1,3, Jungeun Sarah Kwon1, Kimiko Della Croce1, Chris Langsdorf4, Hao Helen Zhang5 & Guang Yao1,6 Reactivating quiescent cells to proliferate is critical to tissue repair and homoeostasis. Quiescence exit is highly noisy even for genetically identical cells under the same environmental conditions. Deregulation of quiescence exit is associated with many diseases, but cellular mechanisms underlying the noisy process of exiting quiescence are poorly understood. Here we show that the heterogeneity of quiescence exit reflects a memory of preceding cell growth at quiescence induction and immediate division history before quiescence entry, and that such a memory is reflected in cell size at a coarse scale. The deterministic memory effects of preceding cell cycle, coupled with the stochastic dynamics of an Rb-E2F bistable switch, jointly and quantitatively explain quiescence-exit heterogeneity. As such, quiescence can be defined as a distinct state outside of the cell cycle while displaying a sequential cell order reflecting preceding cell growth and division variations. 1 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. 2 School of Biological and Medical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China. 3 Department of Biology, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA. 4 Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eugene, OR 97402, USA. 5 Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. 6 Arizona Cancer Centre, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA. Xia Wang, Kotaro Fujimaki and Geoffrey C.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Description of Gene Signatures
    Detailed description of gene signatures Immune response gene signatures Four QTC clusters showed a significant association with immune response, QTC1, QTC8, QTC10, and QTC17. QTC1 was highly enriched for GO:0002376 immune system process (p=9.2x10-31) and GO:0046649 lymphocyte activation (7.1x10-7), QTC8 for GO:0002376 immune system processes (p=9.7x10-5), QTC10 for GO:0002474 antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I (p=2.1x10-5), and QTC17 for the KEGG pathway hsa04060 cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (p=2.3x10-5), suggesting that these gene clusters represents different aspects of the immune response system. QTC1 and QTC8 were highly correlated (r=0.85) whereas QTC10 and QTC17 appeared more independent. QTC1 and QTC8 were more strongly expressed in the MS2b.1 subtype whereas QTC10 and QTC17 were more strongly expressed in the MS2b2.2 subtype QTC1 and QTC8 were merged and subsets of immune-related genes are shown in Figures 1A and 1B. The signature had a prominent activated T-cell theme including key genes ranging from T-cell stimulatory chemokines, T-cell receptor complex genes, T-cell specific markers, as well as signal transducers and effector genes of cytotoxic T-cells. Among the early T-cell activator genes were CCL2, CCL5, IL2RA, IL2RB, and IL7R. CCL2 and CCL5 are known to be produced by tumor cells and induce transendothelial migration and chemotaxis of effector T-cells (Brown et al. 2007, Soria and Ben-Baruch, 2008). CCL5 co-localizes with tumor infiltrating leukocytes and the CCL5 concentrations correlates to CD8+ T-cell infiltration in the epithelial areas of tumors (Negus et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Cycle ­ Wikipedia Cell Cycle from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    11/8/2016 Cell cycle ­ Wikipedia Cell cycle From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The cell cycle or cell­division cycle is the series of events that take place in a cell leading to its division and duplication of its DNA (DNA replication) to produce two daughter cells. In bacteria, which lack a cell nucleus, the cell cycle is divided into the B, C, and D periods. The B period extends from the end of cell division to the beginning of DNA replication. DNA replication occurs during the C period. The D period refers to the stage between the end of DNA replication and the splitting of the bacterial cell into two daughter cells.[2] In cells with a nucleus, as in eukaryotes, the cell cycle is also divided into three periods: interphase, the mitotic (M) phase, and cytokinesis. During interphase, the cell grows, accumulating nutrients needed for mitosis, preparing it for cell division and duplicating its DNA. During the mitotic phase, the chromosomes separate. During the final stage, cytokinesis, the chromosomes and cytoplasm separate into two new daughter cells. To ensure the proper division of the cell, there are control mechanisms known as cell cycle checkpoints. Life Cycle of the cell The cell­division cycle is a vital process by which a single­celled fertilized egg develops into a mature organism, as well as the process by which hair, skin, blood cells, and some internal organs are renewed. After cell division, each of the daughter cells begin the interphase of a new cycle. Although the various stages of interphase are not usually morphologically distinguishable, each phase of the cell cycle has a distinct set of specialized biochemical processes that prepare the cell for initiation of cell division.
    [Show full text]
  • ABT-263 Induces G1/G0-Phase Arrest, Apoptosis and Autophagy in Human Esophageal Cancer Cells in Vitro
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 2017: 1632–1641 © 2017 CPS and SIMM All rights reserved 1671-4083/17 www.nature.com/aps Original Article ABT-263 induces G1/G0-phase arrest, apoptosis and autophagy in human esophageal cancer cells in vitro Qing-huan LIN, Fu-chang QUE, Chun-ping GU, De-sheng ZHONG, Dan ZHOU, Yi KONG, Le YU*, Shu-wen LIU* State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China Abstract Both the anti- and pro-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family are regulated by a conserved Bcl-2 homology (BH3) domain. ABT- 263 (Navitoclax), a novel BH3 mimetic and orally bioavailable Bcl-2 family inhibitor with high affinity for Bcl-xL, Bcl-2 and Bcl-w has entered clinical trials for cancer treatment. But the anticancer mechanisms of ABT-263 have not been fully elucidated. In this study we investigated the effects of ABT-263 on human esophageal cancer cells in vitro and to explore its anticancer mechanisms. Treatment with ABT-263 dose-dependently suppressed the viability of 3 human esophageal cancer cells with IC50 values of 10.7±1.4, 7.1±1.5 and 8.2±1.6 μmol/L, in EC109, HKESC-2 and CaES-17 cells, respectively. ABT-263 (5–20 μmol/L) dose-dependently induced G1/G0-phase arrest in the 3 cancer cell lines and induced apoptosis evidenced by increased the Annexin V-positive cell population and elevated levels of cleaved caspase 3, cleaved caspase 9 and PARP.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cell Cycle
    www.arigobio.com The Cell Cycle Antibody˙Duo˙ELISA kit Cell Division G0 The G0 phase is a period in the cell cycle in which G2/M Checkpoint M cells exist in quiescent state. Depends on cell types, G0 phase can last 6 C / for few days to few years. y Oncogenes : 4 c K l i n Cyclins, Cyclin-Dependent D B C + + Kinases (CDKs), E2F, MYC, C D d MDM2. n i c l 2 c y Tumor Suppressors : G2 The C RB, p53, p21, p27, p57, p14ARF, G1 p16INK4a, p17, p18, p19, TGF-β Cell Cycle receptor, BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM. C y 2 c K lin D A C + + DNA Duplication CD inE K1/2 Cycl S G1/S Checkpoint Cell Content Doubled G1/S Checkpoint G2/M Checkpoint GF Contact DNA DNA Damage Withdrawal TGF-β Innibition Damage DNA repair GSK3β Smad3/4 ATM/ATR DNA-PK ATM/ATR BRCA1 p53 Ubiquitination INK4 p53 CHK2 CHK1/2 p16 p15 p27 p21 Ubiquitination MDM2 INK4 family Cip/Kip family 14-3-3 SKP2 Cdc25B/C MDM2 Nuclear Cdc25A p19ARF Export CDK4/6 CDK2 Nuclear p53 p300/PCAF cyclinD cyclinE Sequestration 14-3-3 p21Cip1 GADD45 Rb HDAC Nuclear Rb E2F DP-I E2F DP-I Export CDC2 cyclinB M phase Promoter OFF Promoter ON Progression Common Methods for Mammalian Cell Cycle Synchronization Cell Cycle Stage Blocked Method Proposed mechanism of action G0/G1 Serum Starvation Growth restriction Lovastin Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase G1 Mimosine Inhibit Thymidine, nucleotide biosynthesis Thymidine Feedback inhibition of DNA replication G1/S Aphidicolin Inhibition of DNA polymerases Hydroxyurea Inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase Colchicine/Colcemide Inhibition of microtubule polymerization G2/M Nocodazole Inhibition of microtubule polymerization ARG30139 Cell Cycle Marker Antibody Panel (Cyclin B1, Cyclin E) The cell cycle is controlled by numerous mechanisms ensuring correct cell division.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Cell-Cycle Progression and Therapeutic Strategies in Human Breast Cancer
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Roles of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Cell-Cycle Progression and Therapeutic Strategies in Human Breast Cancer 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2 1,2 Lei Ding y, Jiaqi Cao y, Wen Lin y, Hongjian Chen , Xianhui Xiong , Hongshun Ao 1,2, Min Yu 1,2, Jie Lin 1,2 and Qinghua Cui 1,2,* 1 Lab of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; [email protected] (L.D.); [email protected] (J.C.); [email protected] (W.L.); [email protected] (H.C.); [email protected] (X.X.); [email protected] (H.A.); [email protected] (M.Y.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 Key Lab of Molecular Cancer Biology, Yunnan Education Department, Kunming 650091, China * Correspondence: [email protected] The authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 31 December 2019; Accepted: 24 February 2020; Published: 13 March 2020 Abstract: Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are serine/threonine kinases whose catalytic activities are regulated by interactions with cyclins and CDK inhibitors (CKIs). CDKs are key regulatory enzymes involved in cell proliferation through regulating cell-cycle checkpoints and transcriptional events in response to extracellular and intracellular signals. Not surprisingly, the dysregulation of CDKs is a hallmark of cancers, and inhibition of specific members is considered an attractive target in cancer therapy. In breast cancer (BC), dual CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, combined with other agents, were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (A/MBC), as well as other sub-types of breast cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Infectious Delivery of the 132 Kb CDKN2A/CDKN2B Genomic DNA Region Results in Correctly Spliced Gene Expression and Growth Suppression in Glioma Cells
    Gene Therapy (2004) 11, 1195–1204 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0969-7128/04 $30.00 www.nature.com/gt RESEARCH ARTICLE Infectious delivery of the 132 kb CDKN2A/CDKN2B genomic DNA region results in correctly spliced gene expression and growth suppression in glioma cells R Inoue, KA Moghaddam, M Ranasinghe, Y Saeki, EA Chiocca and R Wade-Martins1 Molecular Neuro-Oncology Laboratories, Neurosurgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-East and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA The expression of genes from genomic loci can be relatively these proteins are expressed from overlapping genes, complex, utilizing exonic, intronic and flanking sequences utilizing alternative splicing and promoter usage. The to regulate tissue and developmental specificity. Infectious delivered locus expresses each gene at physiological levels bacterial artificial chromosomes (iBACs) have been shown to and cellular responses (apoptosis versus growth arrest) deliver and express large genomic loci (up to 135 kb) into occur dependent on cellular p53 status, as expected. The primary cells for functional analyses. The delivery of large work further demonstrates the potential of the iBAC system genomic DNA inserts allows the expression of complex loci for the delivery of genomic loci whose expression is mediated and of multiple splice variants. Herein, we demonstrate for by complex splicing and promoter usage both for gene the first time that an iBAC will deliver and correctly express in therapy applications and functional genomics studies. human glioma cells the entire CDKN2A/CDKN2B genomic Gene Therapy (2004) 11, 1195–1204. doi:10.1038/ region, which encodes for at least three important cell-cycle sj.gt.3302284; Published online 27 May 2004 regulatory proteins (p16INK4a, p14ARF and p15INK4b).
    [Show full text]