DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2101.10167V1 [Quant-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2101.10167V1 [Quant-Ph] Quantum violation of the Suppes-Zanotti inequalities and “contextuality” Karl Svozil∗ Institute for Theoretical Physics, TU Wien, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10/136, 1040 Vienna, Austria (Dated: January 26, 2021) The Suppes-Zanotti inequalities involving the joint expectations of just three binary quantum observables are (re-)derived by the hull computation of the respective correlation polytope. A min-max calculation reveals its maximal quantum violations correspond to a generalized Tsirelson bound. Notions of “contextuality” motivated by such violations are critically reviewed. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ca, 02.50.-r, 02.10.-v, 03.65.Aa, 03.67.Ac, 03.65.Ud Keywords: Suppes-Zanotti inequalities, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger argument, Kochen-Specker theorem, Born rule, min- max calculation, convex polytope, contextuality I. TWO-PARTITE VECTOR-BASED EXPECTATIONS NOT B. General classical predictions SATISFYING CLASSICAL BOUNDS To construct a generic classical situation, a generalized urn Classical bounds on probabilities and expectations can be model [11] is introducedwhich can also be phrasedin terms of expected to be “violated” by or “being different” from quan- finite-state identification problems of automata allowing com- tum probabilities and expectations because the latter are based plementarity [12]. Its formalization is in terms of set-theoretic on multi-dimensional vectorial entities whereas the formerare partitions [13] and power sets. based on scalars in (sub)sets of power sets. Exactly how these In terms of generalized urn models, we consider urns violations are operationalized and measured has developed filled with black balls painted with three different colors, from an intuitive, heuristic search in the early days [1–3] into one color per observable X, Y, and Z. Since each ob- a systematic method [4–8]. servable may have two different outcomes we can, for in- stance, label these outcomes by “+” and “ ”, printed on The most elementary expression of the classical versus − quantum difference quoted earlier is the two-partite correla- these balls in the respective colors. There are eight such ball types. As the urn is filled with an arbitrary distribu- tion function of two dichotomic observables X,Y 1,+1 . It is empirically collected from a series of N measurements∈{− of} tion of ball types, it can only be ascertained that they oc- 1 N cur with probabilities 0 λ 1, were the indices refer X and Y and defined by X,Y s N ∑i=1 XiYi, where the in- ≤ ±±± ≤ dex i refers to the ith measurement,h i ≈ and s refers to a specific to the respective symbols in the colors associated with our (unaltered) state on which these repetitive measurements are three observables. Since in such a scheme the ball types are performed. It is assumed that, if N increases, the limit exists mutually exclusive and their enumeration is complete (i.e., and is monotonically approached – that is, for “large enough” exhaustive), we can suppose that ∑i, j,k +, λi jk = 1, and the joint expectations add up accordingly;∈{ −} e.g., E(X,Y) = N, X,Y s is a “good approximation” [9]. h i ∑k +, λ++,k + λ ,k λ+ ,k + λ +,k . ∈{ −} −− − − − C. Quantum predictions on a singlet state A. Classical predictions on “singlet-type” states The quantum predictions of a single observable in an ar- arXiv:2101.10167v1 [quant-ph] 25 Jan 2021 It is not too difficult to model a classical two-partite state bitrary direction characterized by the spherical coordinates q which shows “singlet-like” characteristics – an example 0 θ π and 0 ϕ < 2π is derived from the Pauli spin ≤ ≤ ≤ would be the angular momentum in a particular spacial di- matrices σx, σy and σz forming the spin operator σ (θ,ϕ)= rection of two fragments of a bomb which originally had no σx sinθ cosϕ + σy sinθ sinϕ + σz cosθ and the single particle angular momentum in any direction [10]. An argument in- S 1 I projection operator (θ,ϕ)= 2 [ 2 σ (θ,ϕ)] for the states volving equidistribution of angular momenta of the fragments “ ” and “+”, respectively.± The respective± two-partite pro- − reveals a linear classical correlation on such a state; that is, jection operators are S (θ1,ϕ1,θ2,ϕ2) = S (θ1,ϕ1) ±1±2 ±1 ⊗ X,Y c = E(X,Y) = E(θ) = 1 + 2θ/π, where the angle S (θ ,ϕ ). Finally, the operator associated with the two- h i − 2 2 2 0 θ π characterizes the “spatial separation” of the direc- partite± expectations is F(X,Y )= F(θ ,ϕ ,θ ,ϕ )= S + ≤ ≤ 1 1 2 2 ++ tions of these observables X and Y . S (S+ + S +)= σ (θ1,ϕ1) σ (θ2,ϕ2). −−Suppose− − we− are interested⊗ in the correlation func- tion for a singlet state in the Bell basis q = Ψ Ψ ⊺ with Ψ = 1 0,1, 1,0 , then the| −ih quan-−| | −i √2 − tum prediction yields X,Y q = F(θ1,ϕ1,θ2,ϕ2) = [email protected]; http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/˜svozil h i ∗ [cosθ1 cosθ2 + cos(ϕ1 ϕ2)sinθ1 sinθ2]. For − − 2 ϕ1 = ϕ2 this reduces to the well-known cosine form The original method of deriving these bounds is rather in- X,Y q = F(θ1,0,θ2,0)= F(θ1 θ2)= cos(θ1 θ2), that volved. But with today’s convex polytope techniques [4, is,h thei two-partite correlation− for dichotomic− observable− s 7, 20] it is not too difficult to derive those inequalities: X,Y = 1 of the two-partite singlet state is proportional to (i) form all possible combinations of joint occurrences by the Euclidean± scalar product between the vectors associated multiplying the respective dichotomic observables – in this with X and Y . case E(X,Y)= XY, E(X,Z)= XZ, E(Y,Z)= Y Z; (ii) form The maximal quantum-to-classical violations the 3-tuples (that is, the finite ordered list or sequence) of all three numbers for particular instances of X,Y,Z 2 1,+1 E(X,Y),E(X,Z),E(Y,Z) = XY,XZ,YZ , (iii)∈ 2 2 1 2 max E(θ) F(θ) = 1 cos− 0.2 pretend{− these} 3-tuples are coordinates (with respect to the θ 0,π | − | s − π − π π ≈ ∈{ } (1) Cartesian three-dimensional standard basis) of vertices of a resulting from less, as well as more, equal occurrences of convex polytope, and (iv) according to the Minkowski-Weyl the joint observables ++/ and + / +, occur at angles “main” representation theorem [21–23] represent this poly- (d/dθ)[E(θ) F(θ)] = 0,−− that is, at − − tope as its facets by the hull computation [23, 24]. These facet − (in)equalities represent Boole-Bell type “conditions of possi- 2 ble (classical) experience”. θ = sin 1 as well as − π With three dichotomic observables, such procedures result (2) in eight three-dimensional row vectors. Four of them are lin- 1 2 θ = π sin− , respectively. − π early independent. They are interpreted as the vertices of a correlation polytope. The row vectors, stacked on top of one another, form a 4 3 Travis [25] matrix [26] D. Quantum predictions on more general pure states × +1 +1 +1 By a min-max calculation [14] it is not too difficult to com- +1 1 1 Ti j = − − . (5) pute those quantum states which, given arbitrary angles be- 1 +1 1 −1 1 +−1 tween the two observables X and Y , yield the minimal and − − maximal correlations: all that is needed is the eigensystem of The hull computation (eg, by pycddlib [27], a Python wrap- F(θ ,ϕ ,θ ,ϕ ). Rather than enumerating this eigensystem in 1 1 2 2 per of Fukuda’s cddlib algorithm [28] implementing the full generality the special case θ = θ and θ = ϕ = ϕ = 0 is 1 2 1 2 Double Description Method [29]) yields the four Suppes- posted, resulting in the (decomposable) vectors (modulo nor- Zanotti-Brodi inequalities [15, 16] malization) ⊺ 1 E(X,Y)+ E(X,Z)+ E(Y,Z), ψ1,min = 0,cosθ + 1,0,sinθ as well as − ≤ | i ⊺ (3) 1 E(X,Y) E(X,Z)+ E(Y,Z), ψ2,min = cosθ 1,0,sinθ,0 − ≤− − (6) | i − 1 E(X,Y) E(X,Z) E(Y,Z), − ≤ − − for the minimal expectation X,Y = 1; and 1 E(X,Y)+ E(X,Z) E(Y,Z). h i − − ≤− − ⊺ ψ1,max = 0,cosθ 1,0,sinθ as well as | i − ⊺ (4) ψ2,max = cosθ + 1,0,sinθ,0 B. Quantum bounds by min-max calculation | i for the maximal expectation X,Y = 1, respectively. h i The min-max calculations [14] of the associated operators F(X,Y) F(X,Z) F(Y,Z) with the quantum expectation F as defined± earlier amounts± to summing up the separate terms II. THE CASE OF TREE OBSERVABLES and determining the eigensystem of these new observables. It yields quantum bounds allowing ranges bounded by A. Classical bounds 3 < F(X,Y ) F(X,Z) F(Y,Z) < 3 (7) One might as well stop here, contemplate the elementary − ± ± difference between two forms of probabilitiesbased on scalars which violate the classical ones (6) by almost the greatest al- and power sets in the classical case, and on vectors and the gebraically possible amount. vector space spanned by them in the quantum case, and leave For the sake of more concrete realizations, we shall set it at that. However, this is not what happened historically: all azimuthal angles to zero and take equidistant polar angles Bell and others tried to find criteria for non-compliance with such that the directions of X, Y, and Z in configuration space classical behavior involving more than just two observables. are 0, θ, and 2θ, respectively. Then the min-max compu- In particular, Suppes and Zanotti [15–17] presented special tation associated with F(0,θ)+ F(0,2θ)+ F(θ,2θ) exhibits cases of what Boole called “conditions of possible experi- two eigenvalues ence” [18, 19] involving just three dichotomic observables 1/2 X,Y,Z 1,+1 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Science Beyond Enchantment Revisiting the Paradigm of Re-Enchantment As an Explanatory Framework for New Age Science
    INSTITUTIONEN FÖR LITTERATUR, IDÉHISTORIA OCH RELIGION Science Beyond Enchantment Revisiting the Paradigm of Re-enchantment as an Explanatory Framework for New Age Science Kristel Torgrimsson Termin VT-17 Kurs: RKT 250, 30 hp Nivå: Master Handledare: Jessica Moberg Abstract A common understanding of scientists within the New Age movement is that they are manifesting a form of re-enchantment and that their ideas should be addressed as natural theologies. This understanding often takes as its reference point, the re-entanglement of science and religion whose original separation, in this case, is often the working definition of disenchantment. This essay argues that many contemporary scientists who are both popular references and active participants on New Age conferences cannot fully be accounted for by this paradigm. Among these scientists and more particularly those interested in quantum physics, there are many who wish to extend the quantum phenomena not only to support questions of religious character, but to develop theories on physical reality and human nature. Their ambitions are not solely about merging science and religion but also about suggesting new scientific solutions and discussing scientific dilemmas. The purpose of this essay has therefore been to find a viable alternative to the re-enchantment paradigm that offers a more detailed description of their ideas. By opting instead for a radically revised re-enchantment paradigm and an anthropological suggestion for studying minor sciences, this essay has found that a more precise definition of popular New Age scientists could be as (1) “problematic” to the epistemological and ontological underpinnings of the disenchantment of the world, where the problem is not necessarily restricted to the separation of religion and science, and (2) as being a minor science, which entails a critique and challenge to state science, albeit not necessarily in terms of imposing religion on the grounds of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmology Science Books How Consciousness Becomes The
    7/28/2015 Journal of Cosmology About Contents Abstracting Processing Editorial Manuscript Submit Your Book/Journal the All & Indexing Charges Guidelines & Preparation Manuscript Sales Contact Journal Volumes Review Cosmology Science Books Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Order from Amazon Journal of Cosmology, 2011, Vol. 14. JournalofCosmology.com, 2011 How Consciousness Becomes the Physical Universe http://journalofcosmology.com/Consciousness140.html 1/8 7/28/2015 Journal of Cosmology Menas Kafatos, Ph.D.1, Rudolph E. Tanzi, Ph.D.2, and Deepak Chopra, M.D.3 1Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor in Computational Physics, Schmid College of Science, Chapman University, One University Dr. Orange, California, 92866, U.S.A. 2Joseph P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School Genetics and Aging Research Unit Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School 114 16th Street Charlestown, MA 02129 3The Chopra Center for Wellbeing, 2013 Costa del Mar Rd. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Abstract Issues related to consciousness in general and human mental processes in particular remain the most difficult problem in science. Progress has been made through the development of quantum theory, which, unlike classical physics, assigns a fundamental role to the act of observation. To arrive at the most critical aspects of consciousness, such as its characteristics and whether it plays an active role in the universe requires us to follow hopeful developments in the intersection of quantum theory, biology, neuroscience and the philosophy of mind. Developments in quantum theory aiming to unify all physical processes have opened the door to a profoundly new vision of the cosmos, where observer, observed, and the act of observation are interlocked.
    [Show full text]
  • View Biography
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! Menas C. Kafatos, PhD Menas C. Kafatos, Ph.D. is The Fletcher Jones Endowed Chair Professor of Computational Physics at Chapman University, Orange, CA. He received his B.A. in Physics from Cornell University in 1967 and his Ph.D. in Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972, under the direction of the renowned Professor Philip Morrison, who studied under J. Robert Oppenheimer. After postdoctoral work at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, he joined George Mason University (GMU) in Fairfax, VA, and was University Professor of Interdisciplinary Sciences from 1984-2008, where he also served as Dean of the School of Computational Sciences and Director of the Center for Earth Observing and Space Research. He and a team of computational scientists joined Chapman University in fall, 2008. He served as Founding Dean of the Schmid College of Science and Technology and Vice Chancellor at Chapman University (2009- 2012). He directs the Center of Excellence in Earth Systems Modeling and Observations. Overall, he has received more than 70 grants and contracts from a variety of sources including the Office of Naval Research (ONR), NASA, National Science Foundation (NSF), Naval Research Laboratory and USDA. He was the Director of the largest GMU research center, Center for Earth Observing and Space Research (CEOSR) with $8.5M in expenditures in Fiscal Year (FY) 04, and $8.6M in FY05. As P.I. he brought total funding in excess of $40M to GMU between 2000 – 2007 and more over 18 years. He was the top funded PI in federal sponsor expenditures at Chapman University for 2010-2011.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curriculum Vitae Menas Kafatos, Endowed Professor
    Curriculum Vitae Menas Kafatos, Endowed Professor Address: Center of Excellence in Earth Systems Modeling and Observations (CEESMO), Schmid College of Science & Technology, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866 Office: 452 N. Glassell St., Orange, CA 92866 Telephone: 714-289-2048 714-289-2047 (Assistant) Professional email: [email protected] Education: B.A., Physics, Cornell University, NY, U.S.A., 1967 Ph.D., Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, U.S.A., 1972 Professional Employment: Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor of Computational Physics, Chapman University (CU) Director, Center of Excellence in Earth Systems Modeling and Observations, CU (1 September 2012) Founding Dean of the Schmid College of Science & Technology, CU Dean, Schmid College of Science & Technology, CU (1 June, 2009 – 31 August, 2012) Vice Chancellor for Special Projects, CU (1 Oct. 2008 – 31 August, 2012) Director, Center for Earth Observing and Space Research (CEOSR), George Mason University (GMU) (1995 – 2008) Founding Dean, College of Science, George Mason University (GMU) (2006 – 2007) Dean, School of Computational Sciences (SCS), GMU (2002 – 2006) Associate Dean, SCS, GMU (2000 – 2002) Professor of Astrophysics (Invited), Department of Physics, University of Athens, Greece (1990 – 1992) Director for Academic Programs and Science, Institute for Computational Sciences and Informatics (CSI), GMU (1991-1994) Founding Director, CSI Acting Chair, Department of Physics, GMU (1989-1991) Professor, Dept. of Physics, GMU (1984 – 2008) Assistant/Associate Prof., Dept. of Physics, GMU (1975-1984) Postdoctoral Research Associate, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD (1973 – 1975) Postdoctoral Research Associate, Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO (1972 - 1973) Research Assistant, Department of Physics, M.I.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Amitābha Buddha Revisited: Into the Twenty- First Century Modern Science
    International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science Vol. 1 No. 1/2017 AMITĀBHA BUDDHA REVISITED: INTO THE TWENTY- FIRST CENTURY MODERN SCIENCE Ph.D. B. Hyun Choo1, M.D.DABPM. Jay J. Choi2, “Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY1. Formerly UMD New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.2 U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Buddhism and quantum physics share many points of contact. New scientific evidence regarding nonlocality has made possible an insightful understanding of nonduality and wholeness. In light of this discovery, modern intellectuals may become comfortable with the Mahāyāna concept of Buddha’s meritorious qualities. Particularly, Amitābha Buddha symbolizes the Buddha of Infinite Light and Infinite Life, representing the transcendence of time and space. Specifically Amitābha signifies both wisdom and compassion, while the field of quantum mechanics reflects sufficiently the wisdom aspect of Amitābha. However, compassion has not been incorporated in science due to its non-objective nature. Can modern intellectuals understand the wisdom comfortably to encompass compassion? This article develops and employs a novel conceptual approach to address a broader understanding and acceptance of modern science for scholars of religion. We argue that the concept of nonlocality, with its extension into a sequence of nonlocality−nonduality−wholeness, enables Amitābha’s wisdom and compassion to fit reasonably within the framework of modern science. Thus, Amitābha Buddha can be said to re-appear with a scientific face in the 21st century. Keywords: Amitābha Buddha; Buddhism; Quantum Physics; Nonlocality nonduality wholeness; INTRODUCTION In 1936 when Phyllis Wright, a six-grade student in the Sunday school of the Riverside Church in New York, asked Einstein whether scientists pray, and if they do, what they pray for, Einstein replied: “Scientific research is based on the assumption that all events, including the actions of mankind, are determined by the laws of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Foundations and Oriental Medicine
    IMR-219; No. of Pages 7 ARTICLE IN PRESS integr med res x x x ( 2 0 1 6 ) xxx–xxx Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Integrative Medicine Research journa l homepage: www.imr-journal.com Review Article The quantum universe: philosophical foundations and oriental medicine ∗ Menas C. Kafatos , Keun-Hang Yang Center of Excellence in Earth Systems Modeling and Observations (CEESMO), Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The existence of universal principles in both science and medicine implies that one can Received 14 December 2015 explore their common applicability. Here we explore what we have learned from quantum Received in revised form mechanics, phenomena such as entanglement and nonlocality, the role of participation 8 August 2016 of the observer, and how these may apply to oriental medicine. The universal principles of Accepted 15 August 2016 integrated polarity, recursion, and creative interactivity apply to all levels of existence and all Available online xxx human activities, including healing and medicine. This review examines the possibility that what we have learned from quantum mechanics may provide clues to better understand Keywords: the operational principles of oriental medicine in an integrated way. Common to both is quantum theory the assertion that Consciousness is at the foundation of the universe and the inner core oriental medicine of all human beings. This view goes beyond both science and medicine and has strong philosophical systems philosophical foundations in Western philosophy as well as monistic systems of the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Call Number Author Title Date AG5 .B64 2006 New Book of Knowledge
    call number author Title date AG5 .B64 2006 New book of knowledge. 2006 John Simon Guggenheim memorial foundation. Reports of the secretary & of the AS911.J6 treasurer. Snow, C. P. (Charles Percy), AZ361 .S56 1905-1980 Two cultures and the scientific revolution, the two cultures and a second look 1963 BD632 .F67 Formánek, Miloslav. Časoprostor v politice : některé problémy fyzikalismu / Miloslav Formánek. Reichenbach, Hans, 1891- Philosophy of space & time. Translated by Maria Reichenbach and John Freund. BD632 .R413 1953. With introductory remarks by Rudolf Carnap. BD632.G92 Gurnbaum, Adolf Philosophical Problems of Space of Time BD638 .P73 1996 Price, Huw, 1953- Price. 1996 BH301.N3 H55 1985 Hildebrandt, Stefan. Mathematics and optimal form / Stefan Hildebrandt, Anthony Tromba. BT130 .B69 1983 Brams, Steven J. omniscience, omnipotence, immortality, and incomprehensibility / Steven J. Brams. Berry, Adrian, 1937- 1996 CB161 .B459 1996 Next 500 years : life in the coming millennium / Adrian Berry. 1982 E158 .A48 1982 America from the road / Reader's digest. Forbes, Steve, 1947- 1999 E885 .F67 1999 New birth of freedom : vision for America / Steve Forbes. G1019 .R47 1955 Rand McNally and Company. Standard world atlas. G70.4 .S77 1992 oversized Strain, Priscilla. Looking at earth / Priscilla Strain & Frederick Engle. 1992 GB55 .G313 Gaddum, Leonard William, Harold L. Knowles. 1953 Fairbridge, Rhodes W. GC9 .F3 (Rhodes Whitmore), 1914- 2006. Encyclopedia of oceanography, edited by Rhodes W. Fairbridge. Challenge of man's future; an inquiry concerning the condition of man during the GF31 .B68 Brown, Harrison, 1917-1986. years that lie ahead. GF47 .M63 Moran, Joseph M. [and] James H. Wiersma. 1973 Anderson, Walt, 1933- 1996 GN281.4 .A53 1996 Evolution isn't what it used to be : the augmented animal and the whole wired world / Walter Truett Anderson.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Local Universe: the New Physics and Matters of the Mind / by Robert Nadeau and Menas Kafatos
    THE NON-LOCAL UNIVERSE This page intentionally left blank THE NON-LOCAL UNIVERSE The New Physics and Matters of the Mind ROBERT NADEAU MENAS KAFATOS OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogota Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris Sao Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright (©) 1999 by Oxford University Press, Inc. First published by Oxford University Press, Inc., 1999 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 First issued as an Oxford University Press paperback, 2001 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nadeau, Robert, 1944- The non-local universe: the new physics and matters of the mind / by Robert Nadeau and Menas Kafatos. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-19-513256-4 (Cloth) ISBN 0-19-514408-2 (Pbk.) 1. Quantum theory. 2. Physics — Philosophy. I. Kafatos, Menas C. II. Title. QC174.12.N32 1999 530'.01— dc21 99-17062 13579108642 Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS Introduction vii CHAPTER 1 Quantum Nonlocality: An Amazing New Fact
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Abstract
    TOWARDS ONTOLOGY FOR A UNIFIED KNOWLEDGE: THE HYPOTHESIS OF LOGICAL QUANTA Dr. George (Arsenios) Meskos Ph.D. of Theology and Mechanical Engineer Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 1 The weirdness of quantum mechanics .................................................................................. 1 Empirical data, explanation and ontology. ............................................................................ 2 Interpreting Quantum Mechanics ......................................................................................... 3 The ontology of logos ............................................................................................................ 5 The theory of logi of Maximus the Confessor ....................................................................... 6 The Hypothesis of logical quanta .......................................................................................... 8 Human mind and Unification of Knowledge ....................................................................... 10 Science and religion ............................................................................................................. 11 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................... 12 Abstract The Hypothesis of Logical Quanta (HLQ) is a bidirectional synthesis of the medieval theory of logos of beings and the philosophical
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Quantum
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ QUANTUM CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE SEARCH FOR A NEW PARADIGM: HOW SCIENCE CAN BE SPIRITUAL A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ANTHROPOLOGY by Christopher Cochran June 2017 The Dissertation of Christopher Cochran is approved: Professor Susan Harding, Chair Professor Danilyn Rutherford Professor Mario Biagioli _____________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Table of Contents Abstract iv Acknowledgements vi Preface 1 Chapter 1: Introduction to Quantum Consciousness 15 Chapter 2: Demarcation: When Physics Encounters Consciousness 66 Chapter 3: Proliferation: Counter-induction and Realism 118 in Anticipation of the New Paradigm Chapter 4: Spirituality: Certainty and Doubt in the Quantum Imagination 176 Chapter 5: Conclusion 228 Bibliography 239 iii Abstract Christopher Cochran QUANTUM CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE SEARCH FOR A NEW PARADIGM: HOW SCIENCE CAN BE SPIRITUAL This dissertation examines how a network of “quantum consciousness” scientists have sought to change the epistemological and ethical boundaries of scientific research in hopes of creating knowledge that can adequately address contemporary problems in both science and society more generally. Quantum consciousness (QC) is defined as both scientific research and spiritual practice that seeks to understand consciousness in light of foundational questions that emerge from quantum physics. QC scientists believe neuroscience alone cannot provide a scientific explanation of consciousness because neuroscience is premised on “materialism” of Newtonian physics. QC scientists draw on the authority of physics to argue the correct scientific account of the mind-matter relationship will have to incorporate quantum physics, understood as the correct theory of matter since the quantum revolution of the 1920’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers' Litigation Forecasts Play an Integral Role in the Justice System
    Philosophy Study, ISSN 2159-5313 April 2014, Vol. 4, No. 4, 287-301 D DAVID PUBLISHING From Quanta to Qualia: How a Paradigm Shift Turns Into Science Deepak Chopra Menas C. Kafatos University of California San Diego Chapman University Ever since the development of quantum mechanics in the first part of the 20th century, a new world view has emerged. Today, the physicalist objective assumption that objects exist independently of acts of observation has been challenged. The repercussions of this radical challenge to our common-sense perception of the world are far-reaching, although not yet generally realized. Here we argue that there is a complementary view to the way science which is being practiced, and that consciousness itself is primary and qualia form the foundation of experience. We outline the arguments of why the new science of qualia will tie objects that are being perceived to the subjective experience, through the units of subjective experience called qualia. If there is a reality that exists outside of perceptions in consciousness, it is indeed inconceivable. The reason is that once one subtracts everything that one can sense, imagine, feel, or think about, there’s nothing left. Since qualia are subjective, they challenge the dominant world view of science as practiced today, which is reductionist, objective, and mathematical. Our view is a natural continuation of the quantum world view. We outline what the steps will have to be in order to fully develop the science of qualia. Keywords: consciousness, quanta, qualia, Quantum Theory, complementarity, recursion 1. Introduction The reliable world of the Newtonian paradigm, based on the five senses and everyday experience, is undercut by the quantum worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlocality & Communication Complexity
    Nonlocality & Communication Complexity Wim van Dam Wolfson College Centre for Quantum Computation Department of Physics, University of Oxford Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at the Faculty of Physical Sciences, University of Oxford. Nonlocality & Communication Complexity Wim van Dam Wolfson College, University of Oxford D.Phil. thesis, Department of Physics Michaelmas Term 1999 Abstract This thesis discusses the connection between the nonlocal behavior of quantum me- chanics and the communication complexity of distributed computations. The first three chapters provide an introduction to quantum information theory with an emphasis on the description of entangled systems. The next chapter looks at how to measure the complexity of distributed computations. This is expressed by the ‘communicationcom- plexity’, defined as the minimum amount of communication required for the evaluation ¡ ¢ ¤ of a function ¢ £ ¤ ¥—a communication necessary because the input strings and are distributed over separated parties. In the theory of quantum communication, we try to use the nonlocal effects of entangled quantum bits to reduce communication com- plexity. In chapters 5, 6 and 7, such an improvement over classical communication is indeed established for various functions. However, it is also shown that entanglement does not lead to a more efficient calculation of the inner product function. We thus reach the conclusion that nonlocality sometimes—but not always—allows a reduction in communication complexity. This subtle relationship between nonlocality and com- munication vanishes when we consider ‘superstrong’ correlations. We demonstrate that if a violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality with the maximum factor of ¦ is assumed, all decision problems have the same trivial complexity of a single bit.
    [Show full text]