The Commodity Exchange Act TESTIMONY of ROBERT G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Commodity Exchange Act TESTIMONY of ROBERT G Senate Agriculture Committee: The Commodity Exchange Act TESTIMONY OF ROBERT G. EASTON ON BEHALF OF THE MANAGED FUTURES ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, AND FORESTRY UNITED STATES SENATE Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee: My name is Robert G. Easton and I am the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Commodities Corporation Limited located in Princeton, N.J. I also am Chairman of the Government Relations Committee of the Managed Futures Association ("MFA"). I appreciate the opportunity to testify on behalf of MFA at this hearing on the Commodity Exchange Act. MFA, a not-for-profit national trade association with over 600 members, represents the managed futures industry. The objective of the MFA is to enhance the image and understanding of the industry, to further constructive dialogue with regulators in pursuit of regulatory reform, and to improve communication with, and training of, the Association's members through effective conferences and communication programs. MFA is governed by an elected board of directors and has offices in Washington, D.C. and California. MFA membership is composed primarily of commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors who are responsible for the discretionary management of the vast majority of the estimated $20 billion currently invested in managed futures products, including commodity pools and managed futures accounts. Commodities Corporation Limited is an MFA member and is registered as both a commodity pool operator and a commodity trading advisor, managing client capital and its parent company's proprietary capital since 1969. Currently, our company has over $1.3 billion under management. The business operations of MFA members are subject to regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act (the "Act") by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") and, pursuant to delegation of certain regulatory functions under the Act, by the industry's self regulatory organization, the National Futures Association ("NFA"). The Act regulates the business activities of commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors through registration, disclosure, record keeping and reporting requirements. As managers of funds provided by their clients, MFA's members act as purchasers of futures industry services and thus are the indirect beneficiaries of market protection rules under the Act. Thus, those sections of the Act and those activities of the CFTC that regulate the functioning of, or participation in, the markets have an important impact on commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors as representatives of their clients. Regulation of the markets by the CFTC for the protection of market users is not, however, the only regulation affecting managed futures professionals. The CFTC's regulations contain entirely separate regulatory regimes for commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors. Unlike most other members of the futures industry, however, managed futures professionals are confronted with a multiplicity of other regulations, frequently developed with other purposes in mind, but which impact their investment management function. Efficiency and competition in these markets are adversely affected by this multiplicity of regulation. Due to the potential for duplicative and contradictory regulation of these entities by the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, MFA has sought to provide a clear exclusion for these registrants in legislation now under consideration by the Senate Banking Committee. In the interest of outlining our position on those matters we consider currently to be of primary importance, we respectfully request that our letter of August 28, 1995 responding to the request from the Chairman of this Committee for our views be included as part of the record. A. Regulation under the Act. The Act was originally drafted to protect market participants, largely retail speculative accounts or those who hedged their risks in the markets. Increasingly over the past twenty years, both the number and type of participants in the futures markets have changed dramatically. Increasingly, market participants are institutional or commercial users, and retail investors who access the markets through professionally managed funds and accounts. The trend toward investment in managed funds by retail investors to access futures and related markets has been welcomed by industry observers and the regulators because of the presence of professional management and limited liability. There are a number of significant benefits investors realize through professional management of their capital. Due to the nature of these markets, which move quickly on an intraday basis and, at times, are volatile, it is difficult to successfully trade over the long term absent total devotion to trading. Few investors are able individually to commit the time and resources necessary to achieve consistent success in trading these markets. Professional management generally provides an investor with seasoned market experience, more consistency in trading approach, administrative convenience and disclosure of the nature and manner in which the investor will have market exposure. In addition, in managed funds, investors generally are able to achieve significantly greater market and trading strategy diversification than they could achieve by investing separately, which tends to increase the consistency and decrease the volatility of their investment returns and provides the potential to significantly enhance total portfolio returns. Through managed funds investments, investors frequently are able to access far more successful managers who otherwise would not trade the relatively small amount being invested by a single investor. Such funds frequently reflect returns which are not correlated with traditional asset classes and, therefore, provide diversification to stock and bond portfolios. Successful fund managers provide an investment approach based on rigorous research and analysis, strict adherence to investment discipline and diversification to minimize risk. Established risk management techniques frequently reduce actual risk exposure to significantly less than an investor's total investments, but fund structures generally ensure loss exposure does not exceed an investor's total investment plus profits. By providing significant liquidity to the futures markets, commodity funds also enable institutions, corporations, pension plans, farmers and others to hedge effectively against their market risks. Managed futures also confer benefits on the U.S. economy by employing countless persons at futures exchanges and brokerage houses and as accountants, lawyers and other services providers. B. Recognition of Sophisticated Market Participants. MFA members and the products they offer are more stringently regulated than any other product in the world. The CFTC, in administering the Act, oversees and monitors the business activities of commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors through registration, disclosure, record keeping and reporting requirements and regulates the activities of the commodity brokers through which these funds place their trades as well as the activities of the commodity exchanges on which these transactions are executed. The National Futures Association, the self-regulatory body of the industry, also regulates the sales, promotional and operational activities of all these entities. Each of the exchanges on which these contracts trade also regulates the activities of those trading on their markets. In addition, the offer and sale of interests in commodity funds are subject to both the Securities Act of 1993, requiring registration of interests sold publicly and mandating disclosure requirements, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as each of the 51 states' securities laws. The Act, as originally structured, imposes restraints on investment freedom, costs and inefficiencies that provide no corresponding benefit for institutional, professionally managed or sophisticated market participants. These participants have neither the desire nor need for this type of protection. This Committee previously has recognized the need for this type of flexibility as evidenced by the exemptive authority granted to the CFTC under the Futures Trading Practices Act of 1992 and its instruction to exempt appropriate persons with respect to certain market transactions. MFA recommends that additional consideration be given by the CFTC and other regulators to the elaboration of a two-tiered regulatory structure, such as that utilized significantly in other countries with sophisticated financial markets. Such a structure is premised on the recognition that there are two classes of investors with markedly different needs for regulatory protection. A two-tiered regulatory structure will provide a significantly simpler framework for the regulation of those transactions that are entered into among institutional, professional or otherwise- regulated market participants, as distinguished from the general investing public, for which a higher standard of regulation and disclosure would be required. Attention should be paid particularly to exempting transactions in appropriate markets among appropriate participants who are able to protect themselves through their sophistication and experience. Some steps have been taken since 1992 which provide a model for future initiatives of the same type. For example, the adoption of Rule 4.7 in 1992
Recommended publications
  • Hedge Fund Investors
    Further Praise for Inside the House of Money from Hedge Fund Investors “Drobny has done a great job of capturing the inner workings of macro trading by interviewing some of the most interesting people in the fi eld today. This book is a treat and a must-read if you want to understand how the market’s best manage their portfolios.” —Mark Taborsky, Vice President, External Management Harvard Management Company “Inside the House of Money provides a unique insight into the hedge fund business. For those who think hedge funds are mysterious, here they will fi nd them transparent. Readers will be fascinated to see that there are so many ways to make money from an idea.” —Bernard Sabrier, Chairman, Unigestion “With its behind-the-scenes perspective and macro focus, this book is an entertaining, educational read, and also fi lls a substantial gap in hedge fund literature.” —Jim Berens, Cofounder and Managing Director, Pacifi c Alternative Asset Management Company (PAAMCO) “An exciting, fast-paced insider’s look at the elite, often mysterious world of high fi nance. This book is the real deal. An absolute must-read for every endowment, foundation, or pension fund offi cer considering investing with hedge funds.” —Michael Barry, Chief Investment Offi cer, University of Maryland Endowment INSIDE THE HOUSE OF MONEY Top Hedge Fund Traders on Profi ting in the Global Markets Revised and Updated STEVEN DROBNY Foreword by Niall Ferguson Cover Design: Michael J. Freeland Cover Photograph: © Getty Images Copyright © 2006, 2009, 2014 by Steven Drobny. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Guide Conference Sponsors
    TALKING HEDGE Talking Managed Futures & Global Macro: Strategies to Optimize Institutional Portfolios November 2-3, 2016 | OMNI Downtown Austin CONFERENCE GUIDE CONFERENCE SPONSORS 100 Canal Pointe Boulevard ● Suite 214 ● Princeton, New Jersey 08540 609.252.9015 www.ccrow.com TALKING HEDGE Welcome to the delegation of Talking Managed Futures and Global Macro: Strategies to Optimize Institutional Portfolios. We are delighted you can join us and confident that you will receive a solid return on your investment in this event. We formed Talking Hedge to bring together the best minds in alternative investing—allocators, managers and solutions providers—to have open and candid discussions about the challenges each group faces. Our events are designed specifically to give you time to talk and time to meet in a meaningful way. Our goal is for you to walk away with the information you need to meet the challenges of tomorrow. We extend a special thanks to our partner Remy Marino and his team at Deutsche Bank for their partnership and creativity in helping us shape the discussion for a second consecutive year. Our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsoring firms: Abraham Trading Company, Arthur Bell, Campbell & Company, CME Group, Crow & Cushing, Efficient Capital Management, ISAM, Lyxor Asset Management, Quadratic Capital Management, RCM Alternatives, Sunrise Capital Management and Thales Trading Solutions for recognizing the value of this forum and collaborating with us to ensure its success. A special shout-out to RCM Alternatives and Arthur Bell for sponsoring our opening reception! We would also like to thank our stellar speaking faculty for taking the time to develop thoughtful and thought-provoking sessions that will provide much to discuss over coffee and cocktails.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1 Asset Allocation in Commodity Markets 2 Passive
    Notes Introduction 1. Based on the data of the Bank of International Settlements (www.bis.org). 1 Asset Allocation in Commodity Markets 1. The term “top-down” denotes a mode of investment decisions in which the portfolio manager makes the choice of instruments, starting with the broadest category (markets, industries) and ending with the most specific one (individual stocks, instruments). 2. Without taking taxes into account, since, when ignoring this assumption, the capital structure matters. 3. Another classification is referred to by Schneeweis, Crowder, and Kazemi (2010, pp. 91–108), who divide the allocation into strategic allocation, tactical alloca- tion, and dynamic allocation. 4. The concepts of active and passive investment strategies in relation to the com- modity markets have been used, for example, in studies by McFall Lamm (2005) and Engelke and Yuen (2008). 2 Passive Investment Strategies in Commodity Markets 1. The basic form of a futures contract is the same as of a forward contract. The difference is that the futures are settled at the end of each day. We can say that a forward contract is like a string of futures contracts. The credit risk of the futures contract is virtually eliminated (but, of course, there is a probabil- ity that the counterpart fails to complete the contract), because the parties to the transaction pay the initial margin (when the account balance falls below a certain agreed minimum, the investor must submit an additional margin; if he does not, his position will be closed before the margin is used). The futures con- tracts are standardized; the underlying assets, the maturity dates of the contracts (four per year), contract volumes; for example, only the price is negotiated, as opposed to the forward contracts, which are all negotiated (definition by http:// pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futures, accessed on August 12, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund Lp
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM POS AM Post-Effective amendments for registration statement Filing Date: 2008-04-22 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-08-085925 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER CITIGROUP DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND LP Business Address 390 GREENWICH STREET CIK:1209709| IRS No.: 134224248 7TH FLOOR Type: POS AM | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-117275 | Film No.: 08768043 NEW YORK NY 10013 SIC: 6798 Real estate investment trusts 2127235424 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2008 Registration No. 333-117275 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT Under THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in limited partnership agreement) New York 6799 13-4224248 (State of organization) (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer classification Code Number) Identification No.) CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC General Partner 731 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 559-2011 (Address and telephone number of principal executive office) RITA M. MOLESWORTH, ESQ. WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10019-6099 (212) 728-8000 (Name, address and telephone number of agent for service) Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement. If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid CTA/Macro Strategies & Their Role in Providing Portfolio
    June 2012 Futures and OTC Clearing Moving Into the Mainstream: Liquid CTA/Macro Strategies & Their Role in Providing Portfolio Diversification A Prime Finance Business Advisory Services Publication Methodology Table of Contents Key Findings 4 Methodology 6 Introduction 7 Section One: CTA/Macro Strategies Emerge as a Key Portfolio Diversifier 8 Section Two: Growing Sophistication of Systematic Trading Prompts Major Industry Realignment 19 Section Three: Layered Distribution Approaches Offer Diversified Options for Accessing Capital 30 Conclusion 42 Moving Into the Mainstream: Liquid CTA/Macro Strategies and Their Role in Providing Portfolio Diversification I 3 Key Findings Investors’ interest in Liquid Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA)/Macro strategies accelerated sharply after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, as these managers’ outperformed long-only and hedge fund strategies and provided a ready source of liquidity to cash-strapped investors. This was broadly cited as the “2008 Effect”. • Managed Futures assets under management (AUM) grew There has been a decisive shift within the Liquid CTA/ 52% between the end of 2007 and 2011 . Hedge fund Macro manager landscape toward systematic as opposed to industry AUM grew only 5% in that corresponding period.1 discretionary trading. Whereas AUM was fairly evenly split between these two approaches in 2000 (55% systematic and • Managed Futures increased market share as a result, rising 45% discretionary),that ratio changed dramatically to 83% from 10% of combined industry AUM in 2007 to 14% by the systematic and 17% discretionary by the end of 2011.2 end of 2011. • Most of the exchange trading pits have become electronic • The inclusion of Liquid CTA/Macro managers in investor in the past decade, and the number of floor traders has portfolios reflects rising conviction that these managers offer dwindled significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Ed Thorp a MATHEMATICIAN on WALL STREET Statistical Arbitrage - Part IV
    Ed Thorp A MATHEMATICIAN ON WALL STREET Statistical Arbitrage - Part IV Life's turns bring both still other former Morgan Stanley quants whose shops were springing up like dragon’s teeth, and simplicity and diversifica- some of my former Princeton-Newport Partners associates. I asked several of these former Morgan tion with two new and more Stanley people, then and in subsequent years, if they knew how statistical arbitrage had started powerful approaches to at Morgan Stanley. No one did. Only a couple of them had heard rumors of a nameless legendary statistical arbitrage “discoverer” of the Morgan Stanley statistical arbitrage system, who, presumably, was Bamberger - so thoroughly had recognition for rinceton-Newport Partners began his contribution disappeared. winding down in late 1988 and closed If our statistical arbitrage system still worked, operations in 1989. Amidst the stress, the giant investor - a multibillion dollar pension our brains in California were hyperac- and profit sharing plan - was able to take up most tive and we developed not one but two or all of the capacity. Note that every stock mar- new and more powerful approaches ket system is necessarily limited in the amount Pto statistical arbitrage. But after Princeton- of money it can use to produce excess returns. Newport Partners closed I wanted simplicity. We One reason is that buying underpriced securities reduced to a small staff and focused on two areas: tends to raise the price, reducing or eliminating Japanese warrant hedging1 and investing in Thomas Bass in his book The Eudaemonic Pie. They the mispricing, and selling short overpriced other hedge funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Cap Research Ann H
    May 25, 2011 Small-Cap Research Ann H. Heffron, CFA, CPA www.zacks.com 111 North Canal Street Chicago, IL 60606 The First Marblehead Corporation (FMD-NYSE) FMD: Zacks Initiation Report - NEUTRAL OUTLOOK Our recommendation on The First Marblehead Corporation (FMD) is Neutral. FMD is in the initial stages of a turnaround. It has rolled out its new partnered lending program with two lenders, Sun Trust Bank and Kinecta Federal Credit Union, has added tuition payment services to its product line-up through the Current Recommendation Neutral recent acquisition of TMS, and will begin using its Union Federal N/A Savings Bank subsidiary to originate private education loans. Prior Recommendation That said, we believe that any meaningful pickup in revenues will Date of Last Change 06/10/2010 be dependent upon a significant ramp-up in partnered lending loan origination and the re-entry of FMD into the securitization $1.77 market, in which it has not participated since September 2007. Current Price (05/24/11) Until that time, FMD continues to lose money, though at a Six- Month Target Price $2.00 decelerating pace, with our diluted loss per share estimates at $0.81 in fiscal 2011 and $0.52 in fiscal 2012. Fortunately, FMD has strengthened its balance sheet, and has an available cash cushion of about $225 million at present, though it is burning cash at the rate of $12-13 million per quarter. SUMMARY DATA 52-Week High $2.85 Risk Level Above Average 52-Week Low $1.73 Type of Stock N/A One-Year Return (%) -30.59 Industry Fin-Cons Loans Beta 2.14 Zacks Rank in Industry 12 of 12 Average Daily Volume (sh) 201,826 ZACKS ESTIMATES Shares Outstanding (mil) 101 Market Capitalization ($mil) $178 Net Revenue* (in millions of $) Short Interest Ratio (days) 27.42 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Institutional Ownership (%) 40 Insider Ownership (%) 31 (Sep) (Dec) (Mar) (Jun) (Jun) 2009 (84.9)A (86.1)A (130.6)A 11.6A (290.0)A 2010 Annual Cash Dividend $0.00 13.5A 10.1A (16.8)A 9.5A 16.3A Dividend Yield (%) 0.00 2011 5.1A 9.5A (14.6)A 13.9E 13.9E 2012 59.9E 5-Yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtable Letter KNOWLEDGE, VERACITY, FELLOWSHIP
    36087_GrRoundtable.qxp:0 10/4/07 2:41 PM Page 1 THE GREENWICHRoundtable Letter KNOWLEDGE, VERACITY, FELLOWSHIP FALL 2007 • Volume 5, Issue 3 BOARD OF TRUSTEES MR. STORRS GOES TO WASHINGTON Edgar Barksdale By Stephen McMenamin Stephen Bondi William Brown Frank Capra's classic Mr. Smith Goes to Washington is the tale of a wide eyed Jimmy Stewart, an idealist Marc Goodman who quotes Jefferson and Lincoln. He is installed as a senator by power brokers as someone who "won’t John Griswold talk out of turn." Jimmy goes on to buck the establishment and make a difference. Ken Shewer Peter Lawrence Although we were encouraged to go to Washington for more altruistic, less sinister reasons, we quickly dis- Stephen McMenamin covered that this town is a marketplace for ideas. Here policymakers pick the best. They embraced us on EXTERNAL AFFAIRS the strength of our ideas and the reputation of our membership. COMMITTEE Edgar Barksdale This is the third year the External Affairs Committee (EAC) has traveled to Washington, Hartford and New Trey Beck York and this year to London to meet with policymakers. Chairman David Storrs led those meetings with a Steven H. Bruce friendly dispassionate manner that comes from someone who has spent over 30 years as an investor. Once Mark J. Casella Best Practices was published, policymakers started calling. And we promised to send our gray-hairs…the J. Patrick Cave EAC. John Griswold Robert Hunkeler David Storrs, Ed Barksdale and Mark Cassella met in August with senior staff of the U.S Treasury that includ- David McCarthy Bill McCauley ed Undersecretary for Domestic Affairs, Bob Steel as well as a meeting at the White House Council of Stephen McMenamin Economic Advisors with Bryan Corbett.
    [Show full text]
  • Century Global Commodities Corporation Notice Of
    CENTURY GLOBAL COMMODITIES CORPORATION NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND INFORMATION CIRCULAR August 12, 2021 SHAREHOLDERS OF CENTURY GLOBAL COMMODITIES CORPORATION: These materials are important and require your immediate attention. They require you to make important decisions. If you are in doubt as to how to make such decisions, please contact your financial, legal, or other professional advisors. If you have any questions or require more information with regard to voting your shares of Century Global Commodities Corporation, please contact Denis Frawley, Co-Secretary, or Bonnie Leung, Chief Financial Officer and Co- Secretary, at 852-3951-8700. CENTURY GLOBAL COMMODITIES CORPORATION Unit 905-6, 9/F, Houston Centre, 63 Mody Road, Tsim Sha Tsui Kowloon, Hong Kong Telephone: 852-3951-8700 / Facsimile: 852-3101-9302 August 12, 2021 Dear Shareholders: You are cordially invited to attend the annual general meeting (the “Meeting”) of Century Global Commodities Corporation (“Century” or the “Company”) to be held at Unit 905-6, 9/F, Houston Centre, 63 Mody Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong on Monday, September 20, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. (Hong Kong time). The items of business to be considered and voted upon at the Meeting are described in the accompanying Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and Information Circular. One of the business items is the election of directors. Your participation in the affairs of the Company is very important to the Company. Whether or not you plan to attend the Meeting, I encourage you to exercise your right to vote, which can easily be done by completing and submitting your enclosed proxy in accordance with the instructions set forth in the accompanying form of proxy and Information Circular.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside House Money
    ffirs.qxd 4/5/06 12:22 PM Page iii INSIDE THE HOUSE OF MONEY Top Hedge Fund Traders on Profiting in the Global Markets STEVEN DROBNY Foreword by Joseph G. Nicholas John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ffirs.qxd 4/5/06 12:22 PM Page ii ffirs.qxd 4/5/06 12:22 PM Page i Further Praise for Inside the House of Money from Hedge Fund Investors “Drobny has done a great job of capturing the inner workings of macro trading by interviewing some of the most interesting people in the field today.This book is a treat and a must-read if you want to understand how the market’s best manage their portfolios.” —Mark Taborsky,Managing Director, Absolute Return and Fixed Income, Stanford Management Company “Inside the House of Money provides a unique insight into the hedge fund business. For those who think hedge funds are mysterious, here they will find them transparent. Readers will be fascinated to see that there are so many ways to make money from an idea.” —Bernard Sabrier, Chairman, Unigestion “With its behind-the-scenes perspective and macro focus, this book is an entertaining, educational read, and also fills a substantial gap in hedge fund literature.” —Jim Berens, Cofounder and Managing Director, Pacific Alternative Asset Management Company (PAAMCO) “An exciting, fast-paced insider’s look at the elite, often mysterious world of high finance.This book is the real deal.An absolute must-read for every endowment, foundation, or pension fund officer considering investing with hedge funds.” —Michael Barry,Chief Investment Officer, University of Maryland Endowment ffirs.qxd 4/5/06 12:22 PM Page ii ffirs.qxd 4/5/06 12:22 PM Page iii INSIDE THE HOUSE OF MONEY Top Hedge Fund Traders on Profiting in the Global Markets STEVEN DROBNY Foreword by Joseph G.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachings from Commodities Corporation
    Teachings From Commodities Corporation Above is a 19th century depiction of the killing of Spartacus; the famous Thracian slave turned champion gladiator, then rebel leader of the Third Servile War (slave rebellions) against the Roman Empire in 73-71 BC. Spartacus is said to have been a fighter unparalleled in skill and a commander unmatched in war. He used these skills to nearly topple the Roman Empire before finally falling in battle against the armies of Crassius. He undoubtedly learned much of his expertise while in servitude to the House of Vatia; where he trained at the Ludi Gladiatorium “Gladiator School” of Batiatus in Capua. The Ludi of Batiatus in Capua is one of the most famous gladiator schools outside of Rome due to the exceptional macro-ops.com 1 fighting talent that was trained within its walls — Spartacus being just one of the many champions it produced. While reading about Spartacus and the Ludi of Capua in Barry Straus’ book The Spartacus ​ Wars this week, I got to thinking about the importance one’s environment plays in his/her ​ success. Spartacus was, I’m sure, a naturally gifted fighter and leader. But without his time spent training with other equally skilled warriors at the Ludi of Capua; I doubt he would have ever became the slave who almost brought down a global empire. The Ludi experience was essential to his greatness. That’s where he was exposed to a variety of deadly fighting styles, was passed wisdom from seasoned gladiators, and most importantly, driven to excellence by fellow comrades who were all keenly focused on the same goal.
    [Show full text]
  • MARGINS HANDBOOK 2Nd Edition
    MARGINS HANDBOOK 2nd Edition Prepared by the Joint Audit Committee AMEX Commodities Corporation Chicago Board of Trade Chicago Mercantile Exchange Commodity Exchange, Inc. Kansas City Board of Trade Minneapolis Grain Exchange National Futures Association New York Board of Trade New York Mercantile Exchange Philadelphia Board of Trade PREFACE The futures industry’s Joint Audit Committee (JAC) developed the initial edition of this handbook during 1994 in an effort to standardize margin procedures, where possible. The handbook was approved by each of the domestic futures exchanges and the National Futures Association (“NFA”). The initial edition of the Margins Handbook was distributed via a mass mailing to all Futures Commission Merchants (“FCM”) registered as of October 1, 1994. The preparation and distribution of the handbook was intended as a one-time event. However, since that time the industry has seen the mergers of several Exchanges, resulting in an increase of uniform margin procedures. In addition, the JAC has received very favorable comments on its initiative and has noticed a demand for a more current edition. As such, the JAC has developed a second edition to account for recent margin policy changes and to include comments and recommendations received from industry participants. This second edition Margins Handbook will be distributed to all FCMs registered as of July 31, 1999. The JAC will in the future periodically update the handbook to account for material changes. Subsequent editions will be available through the Web sites of the various Exchanges and NFA. Each FCM will receive a notice of any material change and will be instructed to download the new edition from the applicable Web site.
    [Show full text]