Lost in the Usa 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lost in the Usa 3 LOST l BEHIND THE SCENES IN ARIZONA l we’re ON THE ROAD TO ZIMBABWE! l INSIDE OCCUPIED IN THE WASHINGTON DC l AMERICA: THE GRIM TRUTH USA l THE DREAM THAT BECAME A NIGHTMARE ColdType TheWRITING WORTHREADE READING l ISSUE 46 l MARY 2010 B ru C E GI FF IN DETROIT CHASING THE VULtures awaY By Ron Williams. Photographs by Bruce Giffin PLUS l THE LIES OF LIBERATION l THE UNSHAKABLE TRUTH OF HAITI ColdType TheREADER Issue 46 May 2010 LOST IN THE USA 3. CHASING THE VUTURES AWAY FROM DETROIT Ron Williams 9. BEHIND THE SCENES IN ARIZONA Greg Palast 11. MY AMERICAN NIGHTMARE Stacey Warde Editor: Tony Sutton 14. we’re on THE ROAD TO ZIMBABWE David Michael Green ([email protected]) 17. AMERICA: THE GRIM TRUTH Lance Freeman To subscribe, 22 INSIDE OCCUPIED WASHINGTON DC Stephanie Westbrook send an email to: [email protected] (Write subscribe in the subject line) Opinions expressed in The ColdType Reader are not necessarily those of the editor or publisher 24. THE UNSHAKABLE TRUTH IN HAITI Jesse Hagopian Cover Photo by Bruce 29. LIBERAtion’s lieS Felicity Arbuthnot Giffin: Houses slated 34. TRYING TO EXPLAIN THE PLUNDER AND THE CRIME Danny Schechter for demolition in Detroit 37. ZERO TOLERANCE ON WORKPLACE SLAUGHTER Sam Pizzigati 39. THE PENTAGON PAPERS ARE PUBLIC THIS TIME David Swanson 41. WARMONGERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE John Pilger 43. PUTTING THE POPE ON TRIAL George Monbiot 45. ANDERSON COOPER AND CLASS SOLIDARITY Joe Bageant 48. A GRAND ADVENTURE Fred Reed 50. FACING THE THREAT FROM THE FAR RIGHT Chris Hedges 53. SHELL AND THE IRISH FISHERMEN Miriam Cotton 56. COLLATERAL DAMAGE OF SMART SANCTIONS Ali Fathollah-Nejad 58. IS IRAN REALLY A THREAT TO WORLD PEACE? Ray McGovern 2 TheREADER | May 2010 Iran And The West Collateral damage of smart sanctions The prospects for democracy, socio-economic development, and conflict resolution will suffer if the West continues to rely on punitive measures, writes Ali Fathollah-Nejad As the history of the his time, the warmongers’ silly sea- structure. The much neglected difficulty here West–Iran conflict son found its apogée in U.S. neo- – though it is widely acknowledged that the proves, sanctions conservative Daniel Pipes’ advice to bulk of Iranian economy is now in the hands of have rather kept the Obama to “bomb Iran,” shortly after the Guardians – is that millions of civilians con- state of crisis alive TTony Blair, having outlined why he helped in- nected to these wide-ranging sectors thought than contributed to vade Iraq, remarked ominously, “We face the to be controlled by the Guardians will be af- its resolution same problem about Iran today.” The UK’s fected. Seen in this light, the gigantic dimen- Chilcot Inquiry into the launching of the Iraq sion of these alleged “smart sanctions” comes War ironically coincided with a considerable to the fore. military build-up in the Persian Gulf region. All Moreover, so-called “crippling sanctions” this occurred amidst the continued struggle of that target the petrol supply to Iran are still en Iran’s civil rights movement and proclamations route. In anticipation of those U.S. unilateral of Western leaders to be in support of the lat- sanctions, the world’s largest insurance com- ter’s efforts. But is there any evidence for this? panies have announced their retreat from Iran. Sanctions are widely portrayed as necessary, This concerns both the financial and shipping almost healthy medicine to bring about change sectors, and affects petrol supplies to Iran which in the opponent’s policies. However, as the imports 40 percent of its needs. Also three gi- history of the West–Iran conflict proves, sanc- ant oil traders ended supplies to Iran, which tions have rather kept the state of crisis alive amounted to half of Tehran’s imports. Needless than contributed to its resolution. Nonetheless, to say, such sanctions ultimately harm the pop- Western governments do not seem to have lost ulation. To add, a complete implementation their dubious fascination for them. thereof – i.e. preventing Asian competitors to “Smart sanctions”, it is claimed, are a magic step in – would require a naval blockade which wand with which to decapitate evil. In the Irani- amounts to an act of war. an case, evil is identified with the Islamic Revo- As stressed by civil society figures and lutionary Guards Corps. Originally a defense economists, the price of sanctions is being organization to counter Iraqi aggression in the paid by the Iranian population. The Iranian 1980s, the Guardians have developed into an economy – manufacturing, agriculture, bank expansive socio-politico-economic conglomer- and financial sectors etc. – has been hurt from ate believed to possess great economic and po- almost three decades of sanctions. Even today, litical power in today’s Islamic Republic. businesses cannot easily obtain much needed As we are told, “smart sanctions” shall tar- goods on the international market to continue get the Guardians’ grip on the Iranian power production and must often pay above-standard 56 TheREADER | May 2010 Iran And The West prices. Moreover, the scientific community a fig leaf for other agendas. For, in contrast to The only way has faced discrimination in areas of research Western proclamations, sanctions do harm civil forward would be and Iran’s technological advances been slowed society while cementing the position of hard- to adopt a set of down. Reflecting the dangers sanctions pose liners. Iran’s middle class, as a result, will be af- policies that would to the Green Movement, last fall Mir-Hossein fected by this further isolation of the country disarm hardliners Mousavi said, “We are opposed to any types of as sanctions punish honest traders and reward of all sides whose sanctions against our nation.” The same was corrupt ones. The Guardians with their as- business flourishes recently uttered by his fellow opposition leader sumed 60 harbors in the Persian Gulf control in the vicious cycle Mehdi Karroubi in an interview with Corriere the bulk of imports and sanctions will only bol- of enmity della Serra. ster the trend of flourishing “black channels”. Meanwhile a more fundamental problem One might indeed argue that the not-so-un- remains, one that is hardly acknowledged by conscious “collateral damage” of never-ending many proponents who succumb to the adven- sanctions is any meaningful transition to more turous illusion of having a say in the design and democracy in Iran – a prospect which would set implementation of sanctions: They are mainly an uncomfortable precedent for the West’s au- designed by the American Israeli Public Affairs thoritarian friends in the region. Committee (AIPAC), introduced to the U.S. At the very least, the unending story of Congress and finally implemented by the Trea- sanctions bears testimony to Western leaders’ sury Department’s Under Secretary for Terror- commitment to uphold “credibility” in the face ism and Financial Intelligence Stuart Levey of adverse conditions as much as to imposing – an AIPAC confidant. Along this process, the their will on Iran. A futile exercise – even a dan- Ali Fathollah- potential suffering by Iran’s civil society hardly gerous one – if one begins to contemplate the Nejad is a plays a role. aftermath of “smart sanctions” being imposed: German–Iranian Sanctions – either “crippling” or “smart” – Will the next desperate move entail “surgical political scientist; ultimately harm ordinary citizens. “Smart sanc- strikes”? Ph.D. researcher tions” is as much of an oxymoron as “smart Instead of going on believing that sanctions in International weapons” which supposedly through “surgical will one day develop their desired effects, it is Relations at the strikes” only take out evil components. Indeed, high time to put the brakes. Hence, the only universities of much as in the case of their militaristic broth- way forward would be to adopt a set of poli- Münster (Germany) ers-in-sprit, in the end the “collateral damages” cies that would disarm hardliners of all sides and London (School of “smart sanctions” remain dominant. whose business flourishes in the vicious cycle of Oriental and More generally, in an increasingly multi- of enmity. It is only by détente that grist to the African Studies). polar globalized world, sanctions imposed mills of radicalism can be removed – and a sus- The author of upon energy-rich countries are basically futile tainable de-securitization of Iranian politics at- the German as an effective policy tool. Too numerous are tained. Revoking existing sanctions on goods language book, business-driven actors that are only too happy for civilian use could work wonders that would The Iran Conflict to jump in. Thus, Chinese, Russian, and even shake the very fundaments of confrontational and the Obama U.S. companies (acting via Dubai) have hugely postures. Administration: benefitted from the European, U.S.-pressured Despite all frivolous claims, the diplomatic Old Wine in withdrawal from the Iranian market. route has not been exhausted. Indeed, we are New Skins? he Thus, sanctions – a medicine with which far from it. Since the core problem remains the is currently a Western policy-circles are so obsessed with – “security dilemma” in the region, it would be Visiting Lecturer are not a cure but a slow poison applied to the wise for the West to call upon Israel to join the in globalization civil society. Sanctions as prototype of econom- Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The and development ic warfare in concert with the seasonal flaring- transatlantic “coercive strategy” vis-à-vis Iran at the University up of war-mongering are a dangerous mix. The – as it is accurately described in Diplomatic of Westminster, deafening “drums of war” continue to bang Studies – must be suspended for it undermines London.
Recommended publications
  • Ex-Intelligence Officers, Others See Plusses In
    Ex-Intelligence Officers, Others See Plusses in WikiLeaks Disclosures By Global Research Theme: Intelligence Global Research, December 09, 2010 Institute for Public Accuracy 9 December 2010 The following statement was released today, signed by Daniel Ellsberg, Frank Grevil, Katharine Gun, David MacMichael, Ray McGovern, Craig Murray, Coleen Rowley and Larry Wilkerson; all are associated with Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence. WikiLeaks has teased the genie of transparency out of a very opaque bottle, and powerful forces in America, who thrive on secrecy, are trying desperately to stuff the genie back in. The people listed below this release would be pleased to shed light on these exciting new developments. How far down the U.S. has slid can be seen, ironically enough, in a recent commentary in Pravda (that’s right, Russia’s Pravda): “What WikiLeaks has done is make people understand why so many Americans are politically apathetic … After all, the evils committed by those in power can be suffocating, and the sense of powerlessness that erupts can be paralyzing, especially when … government evildoers almost always get away with their crimes. …” So shame on Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and all those who spew platitudes about integrity, justice and accountability while allowing war criminals and torturers to walk freely upon the earth. … the American people should be outraged that their government has transformed a nation with a reputation for freedom, justice, tolerance and respect for human rights into a backwater that revels in its criminality, cover-ups, injustices and hypocrisies. Odd, isn’t it, that it takes a Pravda commentator to drive home the point that the Obama administration is on the wrong side of history.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Background Information on Israel and the US the U.S.-Israel
    Special background information on Israel and the US From TUC Radio: http://www.tucradio.org/new.html TUC Radio is a regular weekly program on over 60 radio stations and can be heard in many rural communities as well as in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle, Cleveland, Houston, Taos, Buffalo, Philadelphia, Vancouver and many other cities - as far as Cape Town, South Africa and into North Africa via Milano, Italy. The U.S.-Israel Special Relationship HERE ARE ALL FOUR PROGRAMS OF THIS MINI-SERIES - BEGINNING WITH PART ONE AND STEPHEN WALT - SCROLL DOWN FOR THE MOST RECENTLY PRODUCED PART FOUR WITH MEMBERS OF THE CIA The U.S.-Israel Special Relationship-Part ONE Keynote: Stephen Walt 30 second Preview/Promo for Part ONE The National Summit to Reassess the U.S.-Israel “Special Relationship,” was held March 7, 2014 at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. It was the most high profile, public response and critique to-date of AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Israel’s foremost US Lobby, whose mission is to quote “urge(s) all members of Congress to support Israel through foreign aid, government partnerships, (and) joint anti-terrorism efforts.” Just days earlier, from March 1st through 3rd, AIPAC had held its annual policy conference in our nation’s capital, celebrating the US Special Relationship with Israel. According to AIPAC’s web site more than half of the Senate, a third of the House of Representatives and countless Israeli and American policymakers were among the 14,000 attendees. In face of that long established relationship granted by the US to no other country, the organizers of the “The National Summit to Reassess the U.S.-Israel ‘Special Relationship’” hoped to open the door to an informed and inclusive national discussion about what they consider the pitfalls of this “special relationship” with Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Installing a Torture Fan at CIA
    افغانستان آزاد – آزاد افغانستان AA-AA چو کشور نباشـد تن من مبـــــــاد بدین بوم وبر زنده یک تن مــــباد همه سر به سر تن به کشتن دهیم از آن به که کشور به دشمن دهیم www.afgazad.com [email protected] زبان های اروپائی European Languages http://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2016/11/20/installing-torture-fan-cia/print/ Installing a Torture Fan at CIA By Ray McGovern November 20, 2016 President-elect Donald Trump’s selection of Kansas Congressman Mike Pompeo, an open aficionado of torture practices used in the “war on terror,” to be CIA director shows that Trump was serious when he said he would support “waterboarding and much worse.” Earlier, there had been a sliver of hope that that, while on the campaign trail, Trump was simply playing to the basest instincts of many Americans who have been brainwashed – by media, politicians, and the CIA itself – into believing that torture “works.” The hope was that the person whom Trump would appoint to head the agency would disabuse him regarding both the efficacy and the legality of torture. But such advice is not likely from Pompeo, who has spoken out against the closing of CIA’s “black sites” used for torture and has criticized the requirement that interrogators adhere to anti- torture laws. He has also opposed closing the prison at Guantanamo, which has become infamous for torture and even murder. After visiting Guantanamo three years ago, where many prisoners were on a hunger strike, Pompeo commented, “It looked to me like a lot of them had put on weight.” There is little doubt that the champagne was flowing on Friday at CIA headquarters, from the seventh-floor executive offices down to the bowels of that building where torture practitioners www.afgazad.com 1 [email protected] have been shielded from accountability for 15 years in what amounts to the CIA’s internal “witness protection” program.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo | ISSF POLICY Series America and the World—2017 and Beyond
    H-Diplo | ISSF POLICY Series America and the World—2017 and Beyond Fractured: Trump’s Foreign Policy after Two Years Essay by David C. Hendrickson, Colorado College Published on 29 January 2019 | issforum.org Editor: Diane Labrosse Web and Production Editor: George Fujii Shortlink: http://tiny.cc/PR-1-5BN Permalink: http://issforum.org/roundtables/policy/1-5BN-fractured PDF URL: http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/Policy-Roundtable-1-5BN.pdf he presidency of Donald Trump is the strangest act in American history; unprecedented in form, in style an endless sequence of improvisations and malapropisms.1 But in substance there is continuity, probably much more than is customarily recognized. It is hard to recognize the continuity, amid the Tdaily meltd owns (and biennial shutdowns), but it exists. In large measure Trump has been a Republican president, carrying out a Republican agenda. His attack on the regulatory agencies follows a Republican script. His call for a prodigious boost to military spending, combined with sharp cuts in taxes, has been the Republican program since the time of Ronald Reagan’s presidency. His climate skepticism corresponds with that of Republican leaders in Congress. On trade and immigration, Trump has departed most radically from Bush Republicanism, but even in that regard Trump’s policies harken back to older traditions in the Grand Old Party. He is different in character and temperament from every Republican predecessor as president, yet has attached himself to much of the traditional Republican program.2 It is in foreign policy, the subject of this essay, where Trump’s role has been most disorienting, his performance ‘up-ending’ in substance and method.
    [Show full text]
  • Keith Olbermann, Lisa Myers, Dawn Fratangelo, Pete Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Monica Novotny
    MSNBC May 4, 2006 Thursday SHOW: COUNTDOWN 8:00 PM EST COUNTDOWN for May 4, 2006 BYLINE: Keith Olbermann, Lisa Myers, Dawn Fratangelo, Pete Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Monica Novotny GUESTS: Richard Wolffe, Michael Musto SECTION: NEWS; Domestic LENGTH: 7549 words HIGHLIGHT: Which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow? KEITH OLBERMANN, HOST: Which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow? The wrath of public political protest, now against the secretary of defense. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) RAY MCGOVERN: Why did you lie to get us into a war that was not necessary? DONALD RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: I`m not in the intelligence business. They gave us the world their honest opinion. It appears that there were not weapons of mass destruction. MCGOVERN: You said you knew where they were. RUMSFELD: I did not. I said I knew where suspect sites were. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) OLBERMANN: No, he literally said he knew where they were. Protesters in Atlanta, including that former CIA analyst, cut Rumsfeld to ribbons today, using only his own words. The political gloves have come of. What came off in the Duke Cunningham scandal? Poker games? Strip poker? We`ll have the latest. Zacarias Moussaoui gets not just a life sentence but his comeuppance. "It`s absolutely clear who won," says the judge. "You came here to be a martyr in a great big bang of glory. Instead, you will die with a whimper." How about locking him in a room with David Blaine? Enough. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I don`t think he`s all there.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Force: Untangling the Discourse
    Preventive Force: Untangling the Discourse William W. Keller Graduate School of Public and International Affairs and Gordon R. Mitchell, Department of Communications 2006-24 About the Matthew B. Ridgway Center The Matthew B. Ridgway Center for International Security Studies at the University of Pittsburgh is dedicated to producing original and impartial analysis that informs policymakers who must confront diverse challenges to international and human security. Center programs address a range of security concerns – from the spread of terrorism and technologies of mass destruction to genocide, failed states, and the abuse of human rights in repressive regimes. The Ridgway Center is affiliated with the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (GSPIA) and the University Center for International Studies (UCIS), both at the University of Pittsburgh. This working paper is one of several outcomes of the Ridgway Working Group on Preemptive and Preventive Military Intervention, chaired by Gordon R. Mitchell. Speaking triumphantly from the deck of an aircraft carrier in May 2003, President George W. Bush declared, “major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.”1 While this optimism drew a predictable response from the live military audience, the credibility of President Bush’s proclamation gradually faded as U.S. forces were drawn into a bloody and costly counter-insurgency campaign that eventually alienated many war supporters. As 2005 drew to a close, rising casualties and spiraling war expenses fueled skepticism of President Bush’s “mission accomplished” message and raised serious doubts about the wisdom of “staying the course in Iraq.”2 One prominent GOP lawmaker commented, “the White House is completely disconnected from reality,”3 while other Republicans called on the Bush administration to produce an exit plan.4 However, as Karl-Heinz Kamp points out, such arguments were drawn narrowly and did not include calls for an overall exit from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States and the NATO Non-Extension Assurances of 1990
    The United States and the NATO Non-extension Assurances of 1990: New Light on an Old Problem? Marc Trachtenberg UCLA Political Science Department Posted November 25, 2020 More than thirty years have gone by since U.S. Secretary of State James Baker assured Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in February 1990 that if Germany remained part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization after reunification and if the United States “maintained a presence” in that country, “there would be no extension” of NATO’s jurisdiction “one inch to the east.”1 NATO, of course, later was expanded to include not just the USSR’s former allies in Eastern Europe but even some former Soviet republics as well, and many Russians have claimed that, in taking in those new members, the NATO powers were reneging on promises that Baker and other high western officials had made as the Cold War was ending.2 The Americans, as Gorbachev himself put the point in 2008, had “promised that NATO wouldn't move beyond the boundaries of Germany after the Cold War but now half of central and Eastern Europe are members, so what happened to their promises? It shows they cannot be trusted.”3 What are we to make of those allegations? Jack Matlock, the U.S. ambassador in Moscow in 1990, thought that the Russians had a real case here. Gorbachev, in his view, had been given “categorical assurances” that “if a united A shorter version of this article was published in International Security 45, no. 3 (Winter 2020/21). 1 See Gorbachev-Baker meeting, February 9, 1990, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2015 Sharing Lifetime Membership in VFP Peace
    VETERANS FOR PEACE Organized locally. Recognized internationally. FALL 2015 Sharing Lifetime Membership in VFP Peace Doug Rawlings As the interim editor of our For Peace. Or consider quarterly newsletter, I have for a moment giving to a been asked to encourage very special person, as you, dear readers, to please Frank Corcoran did the think of signing up for a Life- night of our banquet. time Membership. Frank, an American That got me to thinking War in Vietnam veteran, about our last convention in presented a Lifetime San Diego, and in particular Membership to an hon- about our Saturday night ban- ored guest at the con- quet. We were blessed to vention, Le Ly Haslip, hear from the likes of Phyllis author of When Heaven Bennis, Ray McGovern, Sey- and Earth Changed mour Hersh, and Beau Berg- Places: A Vietnamese dahl's dad, Bob, as the even- Woman's Journey from ing rolled on. But what sticks War to Peace. in my mind now is the brilliant Listen to the words of gambit that the incomparable four esteemed col- Doug Zachary conjured up. leagues who were As the staff person most graced with a lifetime responsible for developing a VFP Lifetime Members (clockwise from top right): membership that fateful strong membership base Ann Wright, Chuck Searcy, Seymour Hersh, and evening in San Diego within VFP, he popped up on Kourtney Mitchell. and think of how your the stage throughout the special loved one might evening encouraging us to daughter, granddaughter or grandson. acknowledge your gift: not just sign up for a Lifetime What a great way to weave your family Membership for ourselves, legacy into the heart and soul of Veterans (Continued on page 4) but to think of GIVING a Life- time Membership to another IN THIS ISSUE: deserving person.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewer's Guide
    DEADLY MISTAKES? Viewer Guide Walter Miale DEADLY MISTAKES? Viewer Guide Walter Miale This Guide accompanies the Deadly Mistakes? DVD's from Bullfrog Films: http://www.bullfrogfilms.com/catalog/dm.html For further information on Deadly Mistakes? and Democracy Dialogues: http://www.greenworldcenter.org 4 DEADLY MISTAKES? Viewer Guide Acknowledgements Thanks to those who consulted with me in the preparation of this Guide: Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists, Bruce Blair of the Center for Defense Information, Philip Brenner, Reed Brody of Human Rights Watch, Noam Chomsky, Erik K. Gustafson of tthe Education for Peace in Iraq Center, Adam Isacson of the Center for International Policy, Peter Kornbluh of National Security Archive, Steven Kosiak of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, Malea Lazu of the Institute for Policy Studies, Carl LeVan, Joshua Muravchik of the American Enterprise Institute, John Pike of GlobalSecurity.org, Amy Quinn of the Institute for Policy Studies, Marcus Raskin of the Institute for Policy Studies, Gene Sharp of the Albert Einstein Institute, and Peter Weiss of the Lawyers Committee for Nuclear Policy. Needless to say, any errors or shortcomings in the Guide are mine, not theirs. Thanks also to the authors and editors who allowed me to use their material: Peter Davis, Joshua L. Dratel, Jim Hershberg, Jim Lobe, Ray McGovern, Glen Pedersen, and Matthew Rothschild. And especially heartfelt thanks to Art Nuko for his painting of Uncle Sam at the crossroads. I would welcome, and will publish in future editions of this Guide or on the Deadly Mistakes? web pages, comments and suggestions for other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethical Critique of the United States-Israel Alliance Reviving the Prophetic Tasks of Remembrance and Critique of Power Daniel C
    An Ethical Critique of the United States-Israel Alliance Reviving the Prophetic Tasks of Remembrance and Critique of Power Daniel C. Maguire Daniel C. Maguire is a professor of moral theology at Marquette University, a Catholic, Jesuit Institution, and past president of The Society of Christian Ethics. He is the author of The Horrors We Bless: Rethinking the Just-War Legacy (Fortress Press, 2007). He who controls the past, controls the future; and he who controls the present, controls the past. –George Orwell War is the coward’s escape from the problems of peace. –Robert MacAfee Brown You cannot like the word, but what is happening is an occupation—to hold 3.5 million Palestinians under occupation. I believe that is a terrible thing for Israel and for the Palestinians… It can’t continue endlessly. –Prime Minister of Israel Ariel Sharon Political language…is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. –George Orwell In no field has the pursuit of truth been more difficult than that of military history. –Military historian Sir B. H. Liddell Hart Whenever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. –German philosopher Heinrich Heine History sneaks up on the powerful. –Professor of Jewish Studies Marc Ellis In 1887, in a speech at the Sorbonne, Ernest Renan observed that “forgetting” is “a crucial factor in the creation of a nation.”[1] In creating a national unifying narrative, certain difficult memories of unseemly events have to be erased. As Renan said, this will even include the wholesale slaughter of certain ethnic and religious groups within the claimed national borders.[2] This violence must be whitewashed off the screen of public consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Ray Mcgovern
    This document is online at: http://ratical.org/ratville/JFK/NotGivePeaceAchance.html Source: http://consortiumnews.com/2014/04/20/trying-not-to-give-peace-a-chance/. Additional hyperlinks by David Ratcliffe. Trying Not to Give Peace a Chance: (The Ukraine in 50 Years of Context) April 20, 2014 Consortiumnews Exclusive: The trust between President Obama and President Putin helped avert a U.S. war on Syria and got Iran to agree to limit its nuclear program, but the neocon-driven crisis in Ukraine has dashed hopes of building on that success for a more peaceful world, writes ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern. By Ray McGovern Contents • Chance #1 – Washington, 1963 • Chance #2 – Reykjavik, 1986 • Chance #3 – The Soviet Union Falls Apart • Double-Cross? • Quotes Around Russia’s National ‘Interests’ • Not Rising to the Bait The unnecessary and regrettable conflict between the U.S. and Russia over Ukraine brings to mind sad remembrances of important junctures at which I watched – as a citizen and a CIA analyst – chances for genuine peace with Russia frittered away. Chance #1 – Washington, 1963 How vividly I recall John Kennedy’s inaugural address when he bid us to ask not what our country could do for us, but rather what we could do for our country. Then and there I decided to put in the service of our government whatever expertise I could offer from my degrees in Russian. So I ended up in Washington more than a half-century ago. The missed chances for peace did not wait. On April 17, 1961, a ragtag CIA-trained-and-funded paramilitary group of some 1,500 men went ashore on Cuba’s Bay of Pigs and were defeated in three days by Cuban forces led by Fidel Castro.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Propaganda Model 1
    A PARTICIPATORY PROPAGANDA MODEL 1 Participatory Propaganda: The Engagement of Audiences in the Spread of Persuasive Communications Alicia Wanless Michael Berk Director of Strategic Communications, Visiting Research Fellow, SecDev Foundation Centre for Cyber Security and International [email protected] Relations Studies, University of Florence [email protected] Paper presented at the "Social Media & Social Order, Culture Conflict 2.0" conference organized by Cultural Conflict 2.0 and sponsored by the Research Council of Norway on 1 December 2017, Oslo. To be published as part of the conference proceedings in 2018. A PARTICIPATORY PROPAGANDA MODEL 2 Abstract Existing research on aspects of propaganda in a digital age tend to focus on isolated techniques or phenomena, such as fake news, trolls, memes, or botnets. Providing invaluable insight on the evolving human-technology interaction in creating new formats of persuasive messaging, these studies lend to an enriched understanding of modern propaganda methods. At the same time, the true effects and magnitude of successful influencing of large audiences in the digital age can only be understood if target audiences are perceived not only as ‘objects’ of influence, but as ‘subjects’ of persuasive communications as well. Drawing from vast available research, as well as original social network and content analyses conducted during the 2016 U.S. presidential elections, this paper presents a new, qualitatively enhanced, model of modern propaganda – “participatory propaganda” - and discusses its effects on modern democratic societies. Keywords: propaganda, Facebook, social network analysis, content analysis, politics A PARTICIPATORY PROPAGANDA MODEL 3 Participatory Propaganda: The Engagement of Audiences in the Spread of Persuasive Communications Rapidly evolving information communications technologies (ICTs) have drastically altered the ways individuals engage in the public information domain, including news ways of becoming subjected to external influencing.
    [Show full text]