Construction of the Front Street / I-435 Diverging Diamond Interchange
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 10 Grade Separations and Interchanges
2005 Grade Separations and Interchanges CHAPTER 10 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES 10.0 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL TYPES OF INTERCHANGES The ability to accommodate high volumes of traffic safely and efficiently through intersections depends largely on the arrangement that is provided for handling intersecting traffic. The greatest efficiency, safety, and capacity, and least amount of air pollution are attained when the intersecting through traffic lanes are grade separated. An interchange is a system of interconnecting roadways in conjunction with one or more grade separations that provide for the movement of traffic between two or more roadways or highways on different levels. Interchange design is the most specialized and highly developed form of intersection design. The designer should be thoroughly familiar with the material in Chapter 9 before starting the design of an interchange. Relevant portions of the following material covered in Chapter 9 also apply to interchange design: • general factors affecting design • basic data required • principles of channelization • design procedure • design standards Material previously covered is not repeated. The discussion which follows covers modifications in the above-mentioned material and additional material pertaining exclusively to interchanges. The economic effect on abutting properties resulting from the design of an intersection at-grade is usually confined to the area in the immediate vicinity of the intersection. An interchange or series of interchanges on a freeway or expressway through a community may affect large contiguous areas or even the entire community. For this reason, consideration should be given to an active public process to encourage context sensitive solutions. Interchanges must be located and designed to provide the most desirable overall plan of access, traffic service, and community development. -
Eastern Gateway Concept Study | Page I
FRONT COVER Eastern Gateway Concept Study | Page i Eastern Gateway Concept Study Leavenworth County, Kansas September 2020 Leavenworth County, Kansas Leavenworth County, Kansas is located in the northwestern portion of the bi-state Kansas City region. The vision of the Public Works Department is to see that its efforts result in improved public streets, roads, bridges, rights of way, and traffic safety; providing convenience, safety, and comfort to the users of public infrastructure. Bill Noll, Infrastructure and Construction Services Director Consultant Team TranSystems 2400 Pershing Road, Suite 400 Kansas City, Missouri 64108 Eastern Gateway Concept Study | Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 | Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Study Area .............................................................................................................................................. 4 SECTION 2 | Alternative Assessment ................................................................................................. 5 Alignment Development ........................................................................................................................ 5 Mapping Analysis .............................................................................................................................. -
Kansas City New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 3Q20
Kansas City New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 3Q20 137 ID PROPERTY UNITS 2 Thrive at Creekside 264 10 Brighton Crossing 162 13 The Backyard at One North 240 18 Maple 36 Townhomes 50 19 Residences at Echelon 243 21 Eagle Crossing Townhomes 190 Total Lease Up 1,149 105 102 103 47 10 24 Summit at West Pryor 250 78 25 Trinity Woods 240 2 48 101 35 The Fairways at Grand 104 53 Summit Phase III 246 100 36 Arbor Mist Townhomes Phase II 80 Total Under Construction 816 36 77 47 The Element by Watermark 276 13 48 Woodsmoke Phase II 63 49 NorthPoint 322 50 The Grove at Lee’s Summit 384 51 New Longview 172 52 Paragon Star 390 53 Withers Farm 191 77 2620 NE 43rd Street 66 110 78 1801 NW Barry - Senior Housing 60 Total Planned 1,924 25 109 98 Milhaus at the Glade 263 99 Oxford on the Blue 846 99 100 Kinsley Forest Development 800 21 101 Pleasant Valley Road 210 98 102 Windrose Townhomes 70 52 103 Barry Road Affordable Housing 90 24 18 104 Bella Vista at the National 346 108 105 Twin Creeks Village Mixed - Use 1,362 51 50 106 Center 301 306 107 Raymore Senior 172 108 2nd Street & Douglas Street 276 109 North Village Views 358 35 19 110 Ansley Development 280 137 The Reserves at Grove Terrace 50 49 106 Total Prospective 5,429 107 2 mi Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective Kansas City New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 3Q20 ID PROPERTY UNITS 97 Wornall Point 98 3 Sixty16 67 113 Martway 90 6 Villas at Ridgeview Falls 237 114 Mission Bowl Redevelopment 160 7 Satori Olathe 260 116 Promontory -
GUIDELINES for TIMING and COORDINATING DIAMOND November 2000 INTERCHANGES with ADJACENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS 6
Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. TX-00/4913-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date GUIDELINES FOR TIMING AND COORDINATING DIAMOND November 2000 INTERCHANGES WITH ADJACENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Nadeem A. Chaudhary and Chi-Leung Chu Report 4913-2 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 7-4913 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research: Construction Division September 1998 – August 2000 Research and Technology Transfer Section 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 5080 Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation. Research Project Title: Operational Strategies for Arterial Congestion at Interchanges 16. Abstract This report contains guidelines for timing diamond interchanges and for coordinating diamond interchanges with closely spaced adjacent signals on the arterial. Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) researchers developed these guidelines during a two-year project funded by the Texas Department of Transportation. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Diamond Interchanges, Capacity Analysis, Traffic No restrictions. This document is available to the Signal Coordination, Traffic Congestion, Signalized public through NTIS: Arterials National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Classif.(of this report) 20. Security Classif.(of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 50 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized GUIDELINES FOR TIMING AND COORDINATING DIAMOND INTERCHANGES WITH ADJACENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS by Nadeem A. -
Recommended Ramp Design Procedures for Facilities Without Frontage Roads
Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4538-3 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date RECOMMENDED RAMP DESIGN PROCEDURES FOR September 2004 FACILITIES WITHOUT FRONTAGE ROADS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. J. Bonneson, K. Zimmerman, C. Messer, and M. Wooldridge Report 0-4538-3 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 0-4538 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2002 - August 2004 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Ramp Design Considerations for Facilities without Frontage Roads 16. Abstract Based on a recent change in Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) policy, frontage roads are not to be included along controlled-access highways unless a study indicates that the frontage road improves safety, improves operations, lowers overall facility costs, or provides essential access. Interchange design options that do not include frontage roads are to be considered for all new freeway construction. Ramps in non- frontage-road settings can be more challenging to design than those in frontage-road settings for several reasons. Adequate ramp length, appropriate horizontal and vertical curvature, and flaring to increase storage area at the crossroad intersection should all be used to design safe and efficient ramps for non-frontage-road settings. -
Interchange Modification Report
INTERSTATE 75 AND STATE ROAD 884 (COLONIAL BOULEVARD) INTERCHANGE LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation – District One February 2015 Interchange Modification Report Interstate 75 and State Road 884 (Colonial Boulevard), Lee County, Florida I, Akram M. Hussein, Florida P.E. Number 58069, have prepared or reviewed/supervised the traffic analysis contained in this study. The study has been prepared in accordance and following guidelines and methodologies consistent with FHWA, FDOT and Lee County policies and technical standards. Based on traffic count information, general data sources, and other pertinent information, I certify that this traffic analysis has been prepared using current and acceptable traffic engineering and transportation planning practices and procedures. ______________________________ Akram M. Hussein, P.E. #58069 ______________________________ Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1-1 SECTION 2 PURPOSE AND NEED .............................................................................. 2-1 SECTION 3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 3-1 SECTION 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................................................... 4-1 4.1 DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY ........................................................................ 4-5 4.2 TRAFFIC FACTORS ......................................................................................................... -
Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI)
What Why How CFI - SR 400 @ SR 53, Dawson County, GA Intersection Control Evaluation A performance-based approach to objectively screen alternatives by focusing on the safety related benefits of each. Traditional Intersections SR 11 @ SR 124, Jackson County, GA Johnson Rd @ SR 74, Fayette County, GA Dogwood Trail @ SR 74, Fayette County, GA Roundabout SR 138 @ Hembree Rd, Fulton County, GA Roundabout • 215+ Existing • 50+ On System/or GDOT $$ • 165+ Off System • 20+ Currently Under Construction • 155+ Planned/programmed RBTs 6 Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) I-95 @ SR 21, Port Wentworth, Chatham County, GA Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) • 6 Existing • 2 Design/under construction • 10+ Under consideration Total: 18+ Continuous Green T SR 120 @ John Ward Rd SW, Cobb County, GA Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) SR 400 @ Lenox Rd NE, Fulton County, GA Reduced Conflict U-Turn (RCUT) SR 20 @ Nail Rd, Henry County, GA Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) SR 400 @ SR 53, Dawson County, GA Unsignalized Signalized • Minor Stop • Signal • All-Way Stop • Median U-Turn • Mini Roundabout • RCUT • Single Lane Roundabout • Displaced Left Turn (CFI) • Multilane Roundabout • Continuous Green-T • RCUT • Jughandle • RIRO w/Downstream U-Turn • Diamond Interchange (signal) • High-T (unsignalized) • Quadrant Roadway • Offset-T Intersections • Diverging Diamond • Diamond Interchange (Stop) • Single Point Interchange • Diamond Interchange (RAB) • Turn Lane Improvements • Turn Lane Improvements • Other Intersection Control Evaluation Deliver a transportation -
350 Highway / Blue Parkway Corridor Plan
350 HIGHWAY / BLUE PARKWAY CORRIDOR PLAN A Land Use, Transportation, Aesthetic and Implementation strategy for the Redevelopment of the Corridor For The 350 Highway / Blue Parkway Client Team January 12, 2007 by Acknowledgements This study was made possible by the unprecedented cooperative efforts of the public officials, the 350 Highway / Blue Parkway Corridor Action Team, the Steering Committee, and concerned citizens and business owners, too numerous to name, along the Corridor. Without their funding commitment, dedication, perseverance, and willingness to take the time to plan for their collective futures, this study would not have been possible. Public & Agency Officials : City of Raytown, Missouri Sue Frank - Mayor Dan Estes ± Acting City Administrator John Ness - Alderman Ward I Greg Walters - Alderman Ward I Jim Aziere - Alderman Ward II Christine White - Alderman Ward II Jeff Kinman - Alderman Ward III Charlotte Melson - Alderman Ward III Barb Schlapia - Alderman Ward IV Sandy Hartwell - Alderman Ward IV Patrick Riehle - Alderman Ward V Marilyn Fleming - Alderman Ward V City of Kansas City, Missouri Kay Barnes - Mayor Wayne Cauthen ± City Manager Deb Hermann - Council Member District I Bill Skaggs - Council Member District I Bonnie Sue Cooper - Council Member District II John Fairfield - Council Member District II Troy Nash - Council Member District III Saundra McFadden-Weaver - Council Member District III Jim Glover - Council Member District IV George Blackwood - Council Member District IV Becky Nace - Council Member District -
Diverging Diamond Interchange Agenda
Diverging Diamond Interchange Agenda . DDI Design . DDI vs. SPUI . SPUI Lessons Learned . DDI Retrofit Design . DDI – I-15/Pioneer Crossing What is a DDI? A DDI is a concept that requires drivers to briefly cross to the left, or opposite side of the road at carefully designed crossover intersections, to eliminate a signal phase. Primary Goal: Better accommodate left turns and eliminate a phase in the signal cycle. What is a DDI? Advantages Disadvantages . Reduces Signal Phases; . Lower Speed Through Improves Operations Interchange . Reduces Conflict Points; . Requires Longer Footprint Improves Safety Between Intersections . Reduces Bridge Area; . Not Practical with a One-way Lowers Costs Frontage Road DDI Design Signal Phasing Alternating Progression Left Turn Progression DDI Design Safety . About 50% Fewer Points of Conflict . Conflict Comes From Only One Direction . Lower Speed Conflicts (less severity, fewer accidents) DDI Design . When is a DDI a possible solution? • Heavily Congested Locations • Intersections Spacing of Approximately 500 Feet or More • Skewed Intersections Work Well Interchange Design DDI Intersection DDI Facts: First 5 Constructed in 3 States DDI Facts: Currently 34 Locations in 14 States SPUI Facts: First 3 Constructed in 3 States SPUI Facts: Currently over 250 in 35 States SPUI’s in Arizona: First Constructed . University Dr/Hohokam Expwy (SR-143) . I-10/7th Street and 7th Avenue . SR-51 (Squaw Peak Parkway) SPUI’s in Arizona: ADOT Comments . Early Designs Work Well . Tight Footprint is Most Effective . Right Turns can be an Issue . Pedestrian Crossings need more research . Left Turn Design is Critical University/Hohokam, Phoenix, AZ DDI Retrofit Design - St George, Utah DDI Retrofit Design - St George, Utah DDI Retrofit Design - SR 210/Baseline DDI Retrofit Design - SR 210/Baseline DDI Retrofit Design - Graves Mill Rd/US 501 DDI Retrofit Design - Graves Mill Rd/US 501 CPHX Examples I-10/University Drive CPHX Examples SR 101/Thunderbird Selection of DDI - I-15/Pioneer Crossing . -
Upgrade U.S. 30 Whitley County
Upgrade U.S. 30 Whitley County A Concept for a U.S. 30 Freeway across Whitley County, Indiana Whitley County U.S. 30 Planning Committee January 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Public Participation ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 The Concept for U.S. 30 ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Improvement Examples .............................................................................................................................................. 37 Implementation Strategies ........................................................................................................................................ 41 WHITLEY COUNTY U.S. 30 PLANNING COMMITTEE Ryan Daniel, Mayor Mark Hisey, Vice President of Facilities Design City of Columbia City Parkview Health George Schrumpf, Commissioner Jon Myers, -
Transportation Outlook 2040 Project List
Transportation Outlook 2040 Project List Transportation Outlook 2040 is the metropolitan transportation plan (MTP) for the greater Kansas City region. A major component of the MTP is identifying a list of regionally important projects to improve the transportation of people and goods (highway, transit, etc.). This federally required project listing is intended to help the region identify and prioritize future transportation investments based on goals, strategies and To demonstrate financial estimated financial resources. The projects in Transportation Outlook 2040 were developed, prioritized, and constraint in the plan, the ultimately selected through a comprehensive and coordinated process involving the general public, regional costs to operate, maintain transportation stakeholders and MARC planning committees. and preserve the transportation system, in the Incorporation by Reference of the MARC Transportation Improvement Program MARC MPO region, is The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a detailed list of projects to be implemented in the next deducted from available four to five years, and is developed for the metropolitan transportation planning process in accordance with transportation revenues first, federal regulations (CFR §450.324). The TIP is incorporated into the MTP by reference, and therefore, upon and the remaining balance is adoption by the MARC Board, the MTP shall include all projects in the most recently approved TIP as well as available for other any future TIP amendments approved before the next MTP update. -
Fact Sheet Diverging Diamond Interchange (Ddi)
FACT SHEET NEPA and Preliminary Design Project DIVERGING DIAMOND INTERCHANGE (DDI) Following additional screening and analysis of interchange configuration alternatives in late 2016, and public review in early 2017, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) identified a Diverging Diamond Interchange as the Preferred Alternative for reconstruction of the interchange at I-70 and Kipling Street. What is a DDI? A DDI crosses traffic to the left side of the road across a grade- I-70 travels separated interchange (in this case, under I-70) and allows over Kipling vehicles to have direct access to freeway ramps without having Street to wait at a traffic signal. Vehicles cross to the opposite side of the road at a traffic signal. Left turns at the interchange do not cross oncoming traffic, which results in fewer crashes because there are fewer potential conflict points. Crashes that do occur are likely to not be as damaging as the T-bone crash that can occur with left turns at typical intersections. A DDI configuration is able to move high volumes of traffic through an interchange without increasing the number of lanes and traffic signals. Where have DDIs been implemented? There are over 100 DDIs currently operating throughout the country, with three present in Colorado: US 36 and McCaslin Boulevard in Louisville I-25 and Fillmore Street in Colorado Springs I-70 and US 6/50 in Grand Junction Anticipated Benefits of a DDI How would I use a DDI at I-70/Kipling? at I-70/Kipling Although DDIs can seem unclear and unusual in an aerial view, traveling through them is usually a pleasant surprise.