DOCSLIB.ORG

A Bizarre Tsunami Epicenter a Disquieting Week for Hoosier GOP on State, Federal Levels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

V12 N44 Thursday, July 20, 2006 A bizarre tsunami epicenter A disquieting week for Hoosier GOP on state, federal levels By BRIAN A. HOWEY NORTH WEBSTER - This was a bizarre week in In- diana politics, which is the epicenter in control for the U.S. House of Representatives with three seats fully in play. And if you’re a Republican, the news is discomfort- ing, disquieting, troubling and depressing. It’s bizarre when two House Republican incumbents -- State Reps. Andy Thomas (in a 63 percent GOP district) and Ralph Ayres (59.8 percent GOP baseline) -- quit their races in the middle of July, deepening the jeopardy of los- ing the Indiana House. Never seen anything like it. It’s bizarre when a second Republican congress- man, in this case U.S. Rep. Chris Chocola, finds himself down by 10 points in his opponents Cooper Secrest poll. Fort Wayne Councilman Tom Hayhurst has a money lead on 3rd CD Last spring, Democrat Baron Hill released a poll that U.S. Rep. Mark Souder. (Hayhurst Campaign Photo) showed him with a 10 percent lead on U.S. Rep. Mike So- drel. of Congress agree to kick in $300,000 to U.S. Rep. John It’s bizarre when in the 68 percent Republican 3rd Hostettler’s lagging fundraising (he trails Democrat Brad CD, Democratic Fort Wayne Councilman Tom Hayhurst has Ellsworth $347,000 to $168,000) and $250,000 to U.S. Rep. a $206,989 to $171,242 fundraising lead over U.S. Rep. Mike Sodrel. Mark Souder. When it comes to cash on hand, Hayhurst’s money lead over Souder is $147,758 to $68,358. Continued on page 3 It’s bizarre when dozens of Republican Members Stem cell debate returns INDIANAPOLIS - U.S. Rep. Mike Pence took to the House floor the other day to urge President Bush to veto a bill allowing for federal funding of stem cell research. “President Ronald Reagan famously said, ‘we can- not diminish the value of one category of human life -- the unborn -- without diminishing the value of all hu- “I support the advancement of man life.’” Pence, R-Columbus, said. stem cell research with clear ethical “Yesterday the United States Senate passed a bill that authorizes the use guidelines because of the promise of federal tax dollars to fund the de- struction of human embryos for sci- it offers for research and treatment entific research. And while supporters of the bill argue that this debate is a options for countless Hoosiers.” battle between science and ideology, - U.S. Sen. Dick Lugar - HOWEY Political Report Page 2 Weekly Briefing on Indiana Politics Thursday, July 20, 2006 that really misses the point..” Pence went on to say, “If the Washington eyes 2nd CD p. 4 Castle-DeGette bill returns to the Con- HPR Interview: Joe Donnelly p. 5 gress tonight, we will simply decide INSIDE whether Congress should take the Bayh addresses Middle Class p. 7 taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Features Americans and use them to fund the Barnes vs. Buell in spotlight p. 8 destruction of human embryos for re- search. You see, I believe that life be- Columnists: James, Colwell p. 10 gins at conception and that a human embryo is human life. I believe it is Horse Race: Eitel eyes HD44 vacancy p. 11 morally wrong to create human life to destroy it for research. And I believe Ticker: GOP snubs Kokomo mayor p. 14 it is morally wrong to take the tax dol- lars of millions of pro-life Americans, who believe that life is sacred, and use The Howey Political Report is The Howey Political Report it to fund the destruction of human published by NewsLink Inc. It PO Box 40265 embryos for research. Indianapolis, IN 46240-0265. “This debate then tonight is not was founded in 1994. really about what an embryo is. This www.howeypolitics.com [email protected] debate is about who we are as a na- Brian A. Howey, Publisher tion and whether we respect fully half Mark Schoeff Jr., Washington Indianapolis Office: 317-506-0883. Writer of our country.” Indianapolis Fax: 317-254-0535. Mark Curry, Washington Writer And President Bush did veto Washington, DC Office: 202-256-5822. Jack E. Howey, Editor the bill, the first veto of his presidency. Business Office: 317-254-0535. The vetoed bill “would sup- Subscriptions: ©2006, The Howey Political Report. port the taking of innocent human $350 annually HPR via e-mail; All rights reserved. Photocopying, Internet life in the hope of finding medical $550 annually HPR & HPR Daily Wire. forwarding, faxing or reproducing in any benefits for others,” said Bush as he Call 317-254-0535. form, in whole or part, is a violation of was surrounded by “snowflake babies” federal law. that came from embryos. “It crosses a moral boundary that our decent society needs to respect.” The children Welsh continued, “The ques- life, but I disagree with the president’s surrounding him, Bush said, “began tion is actually, should these embryos decision. Given the potential of this his or her life as a frozen embryo that be used to find solutions to ailments, research and the limitations of the was created for in vitro fertilization or be hospital waste, as they are now. existing [human embryonic stem cell] but remained unused after the fertility President Bush chose hospital waste. lines eligible for federally funded re- treatments were complete. These boys Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a search, I think additional lines should and girls are not spare parts.” doctor, voted for research because he be made available.” Barry Welsh is a pastor at knew it would lead to cures, he is a I have always felt that the the Laurel United Methodist Church smart man, and I would have voted pro-life industry emerged on this issue near Rushville and is also the Demo- the same way. President Bush, not a too late. If there is a moral objection crat running against Rep. Pence. Rev. doctor, makes a medical decision with to the “destruction” of embryos, many Welsh explained, “Tens of thousands this veto that once again shows why of which do become medical waste, of unneeded embryos are discarded as he and his supporters have a disap- then they shouldn’t have been created hospital waste each year. HOSPITAL proval rating of over 60 percent. As in the first place. WASTE. President Bush surrounded someone that has experienced family Secondly, the pro-life move- himself with children who were pro- members with Alzheimer’s, which also ment is cherry picking its willingness duced outside of a woman’s body by struck Ronald Reagan down, and other to save life while not playing God. science, and God bless each of them, cruel diseases that could be cured I have always found it thoroughly but they would have been created in from this research, I find it disturbing inconsistent to take a pro-life position the petri dish regardless. That was that President Bush chose this time to on conception, but then support the shameful of President Bush to try to use the first veto of his Presidency.” death penalty. v deceive us with that staged announce- Here’s what Sen. Frist, R- ment.” Tenn., said of the matter: “I am pro- HOWEY Political Report Page 3 Weekly Briefing on Indiana Politics Thursday, July 20, 2006 From page 1 Americans are growing increasily impatient about the bloodshed in It was about this time of the year in 1994 -- just as Iraq. That same day, an Associated The Howey Political Report commenced publishing -- that Press/Ipsos survey found Democrats the whispers of the Republican tidal wave began to be were favored 51 to 40 percent in audible. By late August, then U.S. Rep. Lee Hamilton gave its Congressional generic question. an emotional speech at French Lick, describing a “curtain” Moderates were backing Democrats that had descended between him and other Democrats, at 56 percent and conservatives were and his constituents. But it wasn’t until late September that at an amazing 24 percent. If the 3rd the fledgling HPR flipped three congressional races into the CD - currently rated “Leans” Repub- lican - comes fully into play next fall, “Tossups” category. Rep. Ayres Twelve years later, we began rating the chal- that would portend to a Grand Old lenges to U.S. Reps. Mike Sodrel, John Hostettler and Chris Bloodbath. Chocola as “Tossups” in the spring. Stuart Rothenberg, editor of With the release of a WSBT-TV/South Bend the Rothenberg Political Report, wrote in Roll Call, Tribune poll early next week in the Chocola-Donnelly race, “Democrats have a number of surprisingly good polls that there is a distinct prospect that these congressional races suggest a wide range of Democratic challengers, from top- may flip out of the tossup zone and into “Leans Democrat” tier hopefuls to second- and third-tier long shots, have a category. serious chance of winning this fall. But that’s the problem. Delair Ali, of Research 2000, the polling firm used Rather than reflecting the appeal of Democratic candidates, by the Tribune and WSBT-TV, said his gut reaction is that those surveys primarily reflect the national political land- Donnelly is up in the polls because of "disgust" with Repub- scape. Many of these surveys measure the landscape, not licans nationally. Ali said he is not surprised to see Donnelly the combatants, and we won’t know how well Democratic ahead, but said the finding that the incumbent is under 40 candidates will do until much later in the year, possibly percent is somewhat suspect.
Recommended publications
  • Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide

    Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide

    Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide The following is a step-by-step guide for caucus night. An additional guide will be printed for caucus chairs, which will provide a further in-depth discussion of all procedures and reporting of caucus activities. If you have questions concerning the procedures contained in this caucus guide, please contact the Iowa Democratic Party at 515-244-7292. Paid for by the Iowa Democratic Party www.iowademocrats.org and not authorized by any federal candidate or candidate’s committee . Produced in-house Monday, February 1, 2016 – 7:00PM Doors open 6:30PM Who Can Participate in the Caucuses? In order to participate in the Iowa Democratic Party’s First-in-the-Nation Caucuses, you must meet the following qualifications: • Be a resident of Iowa and of the precinct in which you wish to participate • Be a U.S. citizen and otherwise eligible voter (18 years old by November 8, 2016) • Register as a Democrat* (you can register at the caucus) • Be in the registration line or signed in by 7:00pm Those who do not meet the above qualifications are allowed to remain at the caucus as an observer. *Iowans who will be 18 years old by Election Day, November 8, 2016, can participate in the caucuses; however, one cannot register to vote in Iowa until he/she is at least 17 ½ years old. Because the caucuses are held February 1, 2016, it is possible an eligible 2016 voter won’t be able to register as a Democrat by February 1, in which case the eligible voter must declare himself/herself a Democrat by signing a form with the Iowa Democratic Party.
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
  • Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's

    Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's

    MUR759900019 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 4 5 MUR 7304 6 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: December 15, 2017 7 DATE OF NOTIFICATIONS: December 21, 2017 8 DATE LAST RESPONSE RECEIVED September 4, 2018 9 DATE ACTIVATED: May 3, 2018 10 11 EARLIEST SOL: September 10, 2020 12 LATEST SOL: December 31, 2021 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 15 COMPLAINANT: Committee to Defend the President 16 17 RESPONDENTS: Hillary Victory Fund and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 18 treasurer 19 Hillary Rodham Clinton 20 Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 21 treasurer 22 DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee and 23 William Q. Derrough in his official capacity as treasurer 24 Alaska Democratic Party and Carolyn Covington in her official 25 capacity as treasurer 26 Democratic Party of Arkansas and Dawne Vandiver in her official 27 capacity as treasurer 28 Colorado Democratic Party and Rita Simas in her official capacity 29 as treasurer 30 Democratic State Committee (Delaware) and Helene Keeley in her 31 official capacity as treasurer 32 Democratic Executive Committee of Florida and Francesca Menes 33 in her official capacity as treasurer 34 Georgia Federal Elections Committee and Kip Carr in his official 35 capacity as treasurer 36 Idaho State Democratic Party and Leroy Hayes in his official 37 capacity as treasurer 38 Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee and Henry 39 Fernandez in his official capacity as treasurer 40 Iowa Democratic Party and Ken Sagar in his official capacity as 41 treasurer 42 Kansas Democratic Party and Bill Hutton in his official capacity as 43 treasurer 44 Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee and M.
  • Download This Poll Report with Crosstabs

    Download This Poll Report with Crosstabs

    Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Released: Contact: Thursday, January 28, 2016 PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office) [email protected] Follow on Twitter: @PollsterPatrick IOWA: CLINTON CLINGS TO CAUCUS LEAD But Sanders makes gains among most voting blocs West Long Branch, NJ – Hillary Clinton leads Bernie Sanders by 5 points in the latest Monmouth University Poll of likely Iowa Democratic caucusgoers, which is down from 22 points just one month ago. High turnout could make this race even tighter. Hillary Clinton currently garners the support of 47% of likely Democratic caucusgoers compared to 42% for Bernie Sanders. Clinton’s lead has shrunk from the 55% to 33% advantage she held in December. Martin O’Malley clocks in at 6% of the vote, which is unchanged from a month ago. Another 6% are uncommitted or undecided. Clinton enjoys a lead over Sanders among female voters by 50% to 38%, but that is not as large as her 61% to 27% advantage last month. The two are basically tied among men – 46% for Sanders and 43% for Clinton. Last month, Clinton had a slight 47% to 42% edge among men. Clinton leads Sanders by 54% to 34% among voters age 50 and older, which is slightly weaker than her 63% to 26% lead in December. Sanders continues to hold the advantage among voters under 50 by a 59% to 31% margin, which is wider than his 48% to 38% lead last month.
  • Fact-Checking Carrie Giddins & the New York Times

    Fact-Checking Carrie Giddins & the New York Times

    FACT-CHECKING CARRIE GIDDINS & THE NEW YORK TIMES The following editorial by former Iowa Democratic Party Communications Director Carrie Giddins appeared Comment [M1]: This is completely in the New York Times today with numerous falsehoods and distortions. Ms. Giddins was not involved in any false. Even before the GOP Legislature and Governor moved the primary up, the discussions between the Florida Democratic Party and the DNC and has no firsthand knowledge of this FDP enlisted experts on alternative situation, which emerged more than a year ago. processes and conducted extensive research. We proposed a vote-by-mail primary to be held after Feb. 5. Tina Flournoy and other DNC RBC members tried to help us find funding, but “Rules Count” unfortunately, we could not find anyone By CARRIE GIDDINS, New York Times interested in paying for a later primary Comment [M2]: This situation was by no means self-inflicted. Republicans IN life, in love and in politics, when you break the rules there are inevitable and often deserved consequences. control the Florida House 77-43, the Senate 26-14, and the Governor’s office. There was (and remains) no way for the Last year, the Democratic National Committee tried to work with the Florida Democratic Party after the Florida FDP to change the law. We also proposed Legislature selected a date for the state’s primary that conflicted with the committee’s nominating calendar. an alternative plan – the only one that was possible – but it did not receive the Those efforts were met with silence and stonewalling from Florida’s party leaders despite the penalties.
  • CHAPTER 12 PENNSYLVANIA Following Hillary Clinton's Big Victories in the Texas and Ohio Democratic Primaries, the 2008 Campaig

    CHAPTER 12 PENNSYLVANIA Following Hillary Clinton's Big Victories in the Texas and Ohio Democratic Primaries, the 2008 Campaig

    CHAPTER 12 PENNSYLVANIA Following Hillary Clinton’s big victories in the Texas and Ohio Democratic primaries, the 2008 campaign for the Democratic nomination for president became two campaigns. The first campaign was to see who would win most of the ten remaining presidential primaries. The second campaign was over who could gain the most support from the super- delegates, a special set of delegates to the Democratic National Conven- tion who were appointed rather than being selected in the caucuses and primaries. SUPERDELEGATES When the Democratic Party changed its rules in the early 1970s, it endeavored to make the Democratic National Convention a more inclu- sive event. States were required to select more women, young people, and minorities as delegates to the convention. The new rules worked quite well, and the group image of the delegates that went out to the nation on television became noticeably more diverse. By the early 1980s, however, one group was conspicuously missing at the national convention. That was party elected officials, such as state governors, members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, etc. Although a number of women and minorities held major elected offices throughout the nation, it was still true that most elected officials were middle-aged white males. The party rules requiring more women, young people, and minorities at the national convention were, in effect, excluding significant numbers of the party’s major holders of elected office. That was mainly because so many of these elected officials were men, were well-along in their careers, and were not members of a minor- ity group.
  • Selecting Representative and Qualified Candidates for President

    Selecting Representative and Qualified Candidates for President

    Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 This report was researched and writen during the 2019-2020 academic year by students in Fordham Law School’s Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic, where students developed non-partsan recommendatons to strengthen the naton’s insttutons and its democracy. The clinic was supervised by Professor and Dean Emeritus John D. Feerick and Visitng Clinical Professor John Rogan. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the individuals who generously took tme to share their general views and knowledge with us: Robert Bauer, Esq., Professor Monika McDermot, Thomas J. Schwarz, Esq., Representatve Thomas Suozzi, and Jesse Wegman, Esq. This report greatly benefted from Gail McDonald’s research guidance and Flora Donovan’s editng assistance. Judith Rew and Robert Yasharian designed the report. Table of Contents Executve Summary .....................................................................................................................................1 Introducton .....................................................................................................................................................4
  • The Most Negative Presidential Election Ever? 1988

    The Most Negative Presidential Election Ever? 1988

    The Most Negative presidential election ever? 1988 • “One of the most accepted reasons for the loss was the withering personal and political attacks that Bush launched against Dukakis, causing some political analysts to call the 1988 campaign the most negative, issueless presidential campaign in US history.” — Boston Globe “Bush offered no clues about Cabinet contenders in his victory declaration Tuesday night, but he sought to soothe the national political wounds caused by one of the most negative presidential campaigns in recent history.” — Associated Press “By all indications, the nastiest Presidential race in memory will leave in its wake a problematic residue for whoever wins.” — New York Times 1996 • "The eruption of personal attacks offered a clear signal to voters that the coming presidential campaign may turn out to be one of the nastiest and most negative in history.” — Miami Herald. "'It's going to be the nastiest presidential campaign ever,' predicts Larry Sabato." — Newsweek “The incident is further proof that the forthcoming presidential campaign could be the dirtiest yet.” — The Independent (U.K.) • "I've maintained that this campaign is going to be one of the nastiest, bare knuckled, direct, to the gut campaigns in America's political history." — CNN's Bernard Shaw 2000 • “The Bush campaign responded by saying that Gore is running the most negative presidential campaign in history, even as Bush aides took potshots of their own.” — Baltimore Sun • “George W. Bush has issued one of the most negative presidential campaigns really in the history of American politics.” — DNC chair Joe Andrew, on CNN • "People know this is going to be the most negative campaign in Americanhistory." — Haley Barbour, on CNN • "The political campaign that climaxed Nov.
  • The Howey Political Report Is Published by Newslink Follow the Huge Footsteps of Robin Winston and Joe Andrew

    The Howey Political Report Is Published by Newslink Follow the Huge Footsteps of Robin Winston and Joe Andrew

    Thursday, July 12, 2001 ! Volume 7, Number 42 Page 1 of 8 Manous key in Lake The County tax dilemma Howey !"#$%&'()**"*%+,--%*../%0,1%,*1,2031 By BRIAN A. HOWEY in Indianapolis From Gov. Frank O’Bannon’s perspective, Peter Political Manous may possess the key to one of the toughest locks for Indiana Democrats in their drive to become the state’s majority party. With tax restructuring a daunting public policy and Report with its impact on the state and Lake County potentially severe, O’Bannon reached out to the Merrillville attorney to The Howey Political Report is published by NewsLink follow the huge footsteps of Robin Winston and Joe Andrew. Inc. Founded in 1994, The Howey Political Report is an independent, non-partisan newsletter analyzing the Winston will turn the party chairmanship over to Manous on political process in Indiana. Dec. 31 after prolonging Democratic gubernatorial rule to 16 Brian A. Howey, publisher years, retaining the Indiana House majority, and coming within about 500 votes of winning mayoralites in the state’s Mark Schoeff Jr., Washington writer four largest cities. Jack E. Howey, editor Lake County is a very complicated entity when it The Howey Political Report Office: 317-254-1533 comes to politics and the public policy aspects of tax restruc- PO Box 40265 Fax: 317-466-0993 turing. HPR asked the governor if he made the selection with Indianapolis, IN 46240-0265 Mobile: 317-506-0883 the idea that Manous would help him understand and inter- [email protected] pret what can be a very divisive situation up there? www.howeypolitics.com O’Bannon responded, “Peter will always be a big Washington office: 202-775-3242; asset from that standpoint.
  • Barack Obama's Strategy to Win the 2008 Democratic Nomination for President

    Barack Obama's Strategy to Win the 2008 Democratic Nomination for President

    Barackin’ The Vote: Barack Obama’s Strategy to Win The 2008 Democratic Nomination for President By: Daniel H. Greeley GOVT 315.001 – Elections & Voting Behavior Capstone Advisor: Professor Candice Nelson Table of Contents Section Page Number Introduction 1 Overall Strategy 2 Message 9 Fundraising 16 State-by-State Tactics 20 Conclusion 28 Works Cited 30 Appendix I: Table 1 – Obama Campaign State-by-State Expenditure Totals 34 Appendix II: Chart 1 – Obama Campaign Expenditures by State Over Time 35 Appendix III: Chart 2 – Obama Campaign Expenditures by Type 36 Appendix IV: Charts 3-11 – Obama Campaign Expenditures Per Quarter For Key States 38 Greeley 1 Introduction: While most people think that the goal of a presidential campaign is to win the election, this is not always the case. Some candidates mount a presidential campaign to raise awareness about an issue, such as Senator Tom Tancredo on immigration reform. Others want to make one of the frontrunner candidates address a specific issue. And, other candidates might want to garner name recognition and fundraising prowess to strengthen their chances of winning re- election to their current office. Finally, some candidates, like George H.W. Bush in 1980, enter the race to showcase their political strengths in the hopes that they might be able to join their party’s ticket or administration if their party wins in the general election. Senator Barack Obama from Illinois, who is an African-American, is running in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. Even four years ago, if someone had said an African-American was running for president, the conventional wisdom in the political establishment would probably have been that the candidate was running to raise awareness about race issues or to make the other candidates at least acknowledge these issues.
  • Internal Review Report for the Iowa Democratic Party 2020 Iowa Caucuses

    Internal Review Report for the Iowa Democratic Party 2020 Iowa Caucuses

    INTERNAL REVIEW REPORT FOR THE IOWA DEMOCRATIC PARTY 2020 IOWA CAUCUSES November 10, 2020 Nick Klinefeldt David Yoshimura & Bonnie Campbell Campbell Law Firm TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 A. Engagement ........................................................................................................................................ 1 B. Process ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. History of the Iowa Caucuses .............................................................................................................. 1 B. How the Iowa Democratic Caucuses Work.......................................................................................... 2 Findings of Fact ................................................................................................................................................. 3 A. The IDP Delegate Selection Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 1. Unity Reform Commission Report ................................................................................................. 3 2. DNC Delegate Selection
  • <Em>La Follette</Em>'S Folly: a Critique of Party Associational

    <Em>La Follette</Em>'S Folly: a Critique of Party Associational

    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 42 2008 La Follette's Folly: A Critique of Party Associational Rights in Presidential Nomination Politics Alan Martinson University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Law and Politics Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Alan Martinson, La Follette's Folly: A Critique of Party Associational Rights in Presidential Nomination Politics, 42 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 185 (2008). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol42/iss1/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LA FOLLE7TE'S FOLLY: A CRITIQUE OF PARTY ASSOCIATIONAL RIGHTS IN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION POLITICS Alan Martinson* Every four years, observers of the presidential nomination season decry the undue influence of those states that hold theirprimaries first, particularlyIowa and New Hampshire. Currently, Democratic Party rules protect the position of these states. In 2008, two states disregardedparty rules in order to move their primaries to a more influentialposition in the primary season. As punishmentfor disobeying the rules, the national party diluted the influence of the delegates from these states at the national convention. Legislative solutions to the problems of the current nomi- nation process appear unlikely.