Thank You for Considering Working for the Government of Nunavut!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS . -
Kivia Covid 19 Response Initiative Phase 2
KivIA Covid 19 Response Initiative Phase 2 December 8, 2020 By KIA Announcements / Inuit Programs & Services RANKIN INLET, NU – December 7, 2020 – The Kivalliq Inuit Association (KivIA) is pleased to announce the launch of the second phase of its COVID-19 initiatives for its members. Initiatives that included support for its Elders, traditional activities, and support to all its members within our communities had ended. The additional funds for KivIA’s second phase COVID-19 response plan come from additional funding from the Indigenous Community Support Fund (ICSF). The KivIA had carefully considered various options to roll out this additional funding from the federal government. The discussion led to a consensus on a plan that would… Eliminate the need to have the program become application based Allow the general public, KIA staff and Inuit to not come in contact with each other in order to carry out this program, therefore following the Public Health Measures currently in effect. Allow the Inuit in the Kivalliq communities to quickly receive the relief funds without any delay due to administrative time. Benefit local Inuit owned companies with their services Maximize the funding effectiveness with the addition of added funds from the vendor and ability for its members to add on to their dividends. Prevent any tax implications for the Inuit from the federal government in receiving this relief funding. With the above factors put into consideration, it was suggested by the Covid-19 Planning Committee that the ICS Funding would be rolled out with a partnership with the Arctic Cooperatives Limited to provide $1500 gift cards to every Inuit household in the Kivalliq Region. -
Mining for Power: Uranium Mining in Baker Lake Nunavut
Mining for Power: Uranium and the Community of Baker Lake, Nunavut Elaine Wang, University of Vermont (prepared for ENVS 295, Dr. Saleem H. Ali) December 2006 Three representations of the Kivalliq District, Nunavut Clockwise from upper left: project map released to the media by Titan Uranium; satellite image from Google Maps; caribou ranges mapped by Beverly-Qamanirjuaq Caribou Management Board “The Kiggavik Project near Baker Lake never went ahead. It is possible that, because of changing market conditions and the superior ore grades in neighboring Saskatchewan, 1989-90 had provided a window of opportunity for its development that was never to be repeated.” -Robert McPherson 2003, New Owners in the Own Land adapted from Cameco Corporation, 2006; not constant dollars Introduction In a plebiscite held on March 26, 1990, residents of the hamlet of Baker Lake (in what was then the District of Keewatin, Northwest Territories, now the District of Kivalliq, Nunavut, Canada), voted overwhelmingly against the development of a uranium mine by Urangesellschaft Canada Ltd. (UG) at a nearby site called Kiggavik, part of what prospectors know as the Thelon Basin. As a result, UG never explored its claims. In August of the same year, Bob Leonard, the president of the Keewatin Chamber of Commerce stated, “We are in an economic crisis. The economy in the Keewatin is in a mess. We are totally dependent on government spending and there’s no way that can continue.”1 The opening quote by Robert McPherson, a mining consultant in the Nunavut land claims negotiations, suggests that as recently as 2003, uranium mining near Baker Lake was, for many reasons, considered a non-option. -
Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan for Whale Cove (Tikirarjuaq)
ATULIQTUQ: ACTION AND ADAPTATION IN NUNAVUT CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION ACTION PLAN FOR WHALE COVE (TIKIRARJUAQ) 2010 Written by: Katie Hayhurst, MCIP Taylor Zeeg, MCIP Kuch&HayhurstConsulting ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: ATULIQTUQ: Action and Adaptation in Nunavut is a collaborative project of the Government of Nunavut, the Canadian Institute of Planners, Natural Resources Canada and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. The Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan for Whale Cove (Tikirarjuaq) was prepared by Katie Hayhurst and Taylor Zeeg with the support of Kuch & Hayhurst Consulting and Compass Resource Management respectively. The authors would like to recognize the contributions of: • Mayor, Council and Hamlet Staff • Elders • Community Participants • Hunters and Trappers • School Staff and Students • Community Radio • Translators, Cooks, Organizers, Volunteers in the completion of this adaptation plan. Whale Cove Climate Change Plan July 2010 Acknowledgements This plan was a community effort involving many community volunteers and participants attending feasts, workshops, meetings, movie nights, and school events, supported by scientists, planners and government funders. As the two Canadian Institute of Planners (CIP) volunteers involved in the pilot project for Whale Cove, we hope this Plan provides a good start to addressing climate change in the community. We are grateful to the many people and funders who made it possible: - Mayor, Council and Hamlet Staff - Elders - Community Participants - Hunters and Trappers - School Staff and Students - -
2017-2018 Annual Report on the Operation of the Medical Care Plan
Government of Nunavut Department of Health 2017/2018 Annual Report on the Operation of the Medical Care Plan From the Director of Medical Insurance Page 1 of 5 Legislative Authority Legislation governing the administration of health care in Nunavut was carried over from the Northwest Territories (as Nunavut statutes) pursuant to the Nunavut Act. The Medical Care Act (hereinafter, the “Act”) governs who is covered by the Nunavut Health Insurance Plan and the payment of benefits for insured medical services. Section 23(1) of the Act requires the Minister responsible for the Act to appoint a Director of Medical Insurance (the “Director”). The Director is responsible for the administration of the Act and regulations by: (a) Assessing the eligibility for entitlement of persons to insured services; (b) Assessing the amounts payable to insured services; and (c) Authorizing payment of the amounts assessed under paragraph (b) out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund; (i) To the medical practitioner who provided the insured services or to the person on his or her behalf; or (ii) To the insured person who received the insured services as per Section 5 of the Act. Section 24 requires the Director to submit an annual report on the operation of the Medical Care Plan (Nunavut Health Insurance Plan) to the Minister for tabling in the Legislative Assembly. Overview of Health Care Services in Nunavut The management and delivery of health care services in Nunavut are included in the overall operations of the Department of Health (the “Department”). The Department has a regional office located in each of Nunavut’s three regions, which manages the delivery of health services at a regional level. -
Gr.9 Nunavut-Final
GRADE 9 SOCIAL STUDIES & CIVICS NUNAVUT Part 1 The Land Claim Part 2 The Government GRADE 9 SOCIAL STUDIES & CIVICS NUNAVUT WRITTEN & EDITED BY NICK NEWBERY Publication of this unit was made possible by funding from the Qikiqtaaluk Corporation P.O.Box 1228, Iqaluit, Nunavut XOA OHO Copyright by Nick Newbery, Qikiqtaaluk Corporation & GN Dept. of Education Iqaluit, Nunavut XOA OHO All rights reserved Printed in Canada ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Arctic College Nunatta Campus: Unit on Nunavut Jim Bell: Nunatsiaq News Canadian Geographic Magazine Map of 3 National Parks Miro Cernetig: The Globe & Mail Department of Indian & Northern Affairs: Film: Changing the Map of Canada Gage Publishing: Indians, Inuit & Metis Government of Nunavut : Film: Nunavut Kanatami: Creation of a New Territory Hancock House Publishers: Eskimo Life Yesterday Inuit Broadcasting Corporation: Film: The Signing of the Nunavut Land Claim Agreement Gordon Mackay: GN Dept. of Sustainable Development Gavin Nesbitt Nunavut Implementation Commission Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. Map: Inuit Owned Lands Nunavut Land Claim Agreement Office of the Clerk of the Legislative Assembly Sutton Boys’ School: Inuit, Learning Through Action Whit Fraser Productions Teacher Reference This ready-to-photocopy unit attempts to outline the theme of Nunavut for Grade 9 ESL students in two parts: (i) The Land Claim and (ii) The Government. It can be seen as self-contained or as a starter kit for teachers wishing to go further. The project tries to provide opportunities for reading, writing, research & discussion coupled with regular review exercises. Some suggestions: 1. Comprehension: -teacher to read passage twice, explain text -do exercises orally then written -same procedure next day, students reading -assign as homework -test next day 2. -
The Politics of Development in Nunavut: Land Claims, Arctic Urbanization, and Geopolitics
University of Alberta The Politics of Development in Nunavut: Land Claims, Arctic Urbanization, and Geopolitics by Barret Weber A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology ©Barret Weber Spring 2013 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. ABSTRACT This thesis surveys the development of Nunavut as not only a governmental and institutional entity but as a territory that is a political and social space both in the tradition of the Territories of the Canadian State and of Westphalian territorial government generally. It relies on Inuit everyday life, knowledge and values in the Eastern and Central Canadian Arctic. Drawing on first hand ethnographic fieldwork conducted primarily in Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada, from 2008–2011; interviews with key informants; archival research, and participant observation in local, national and international governmental forums; Iqaluit, capital of Nunavut, is presented as a major case study. -
Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut
Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut by Kelsey Peterson A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Guelph, Ontario, Canada ©Kelsey Peterson, April, 2012 ABSTRACT COMMUNITY EXPERIENCES OF MINING IN BAKER LAKE, NUNAVUT Kelsey Peterson Advisor: University of Guelph, 2012 Professor Ben Bradshaw With recent increases in mineral prices, the Canadian Arctic has experienced a dramatic upswing in mining development. With the development of the Meadowbank gold mine, the nearby Hamlet of Baker Lake, Nunavut is experiencing these changes firsthand. In response to an invitation from the Hamlet of Baker Lake, this research document residents’ experiences with the Meadowbank mine. These experiences are not felt homogeneously across the community; indeed, residents’ experiences with mining have been mixed. Beyond this core finding, the research suggests four further notable insights: employment has provided the opportunity for people to elevate themselves out of welfare/social assistance; education has become more common, but some students are leaving high school to pursue mine work; and local businesses are benefiting from mining contracts, but this is limited to those companies pre-existing the mine. Finally, varied individual experiences are in part generated by an individual’s context including personal context and choices. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and assistance of several key people. My advisor, Ben Bradshaw, has been instrumental in all stages of pre- research, research and writing. From accepting me to the program and connecting me to Baker Lake to funding my research and reading innumerable drafts of the written thesis, Professor Bradshaw has been critical to this research project. -
“The Disease That Knowledge Must Cure”?: Sites of Uncertainty in Arctic Development
“The Disease that Knowledge Must Cure”?: Sites of Uncertainty in Arctic Development Jessica Metuzals & Myra J. Hird After nearly eight years of formal environmental review, in July 2016, the Canadian federal government rejected the French multinational AREVA’s proposal to construct a uranium mine 80 kilometers west of Qamani’tuaq/Baker Lake, a small inland and mainly Inuit hamlet in the Kivalliq region of Nunavut. The decision not to grant a license for resource development based on a technical uncertainty (AREVA was not able to provide a start-date for the mining project due to a depressed uranium market) underlies a far more complex and ongoing negotiation with uncertainty. Sites of uncertainty are spaces — physical, temporal, emotional, material, discursive and so on—that are occupied by a state of not knowing. Based on recent qualitative fieldwork in Baker Lake, this paper will identify key sites of uncertainty where AREVA, government officials, Inuit organizations, and community residents constructed, negotiated, expressed, transformed, experienced, and responded to uranium mining as a resource development controversy. Our analysis reveals how AREVA understood uncertainty as the “disease that knowledge must cure”, that is, the view that uncertainty is something to be reduced through the acquisition of increased expertise (Jasanoff, 2007: 33). This paper will demonstrate how this epistemological approach resulted in claims to certainty that were deeply contested and deconstructed when positioned against the contextual and relational knowledge of local residents. It will conclude by detailing how local residents’ calls for improvements in education can be understood as a strategic intervention, one that is reflective of an intermeshing of Inuit and western epistemologies. -
TAB8A DFO BN Kivalliq Char Update
SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD December 2020 FOR Information: X Decision: Issue: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada – Kivalliq Region Arctic Char Update Fisheries Management Update: Within the Kivalliq region of Nunavut there are seven communities that are engaged in Arctic Char fisheries. Arviat, Whale Cove (Tikirarjuak), Rankin Inlet (Kangiqiniq), Chesterfield Inlet (Igluligaarjuk), Baker Lake (Qamanit’uak), Coral Harbour (Salliq) and Repulse Bay (Naujaat) have a long history of harvesting Arctic Char for a variety of purposes, including subsistence, recreational and commercial. Several of these communities are currently engaged in commercial fisheries. In February 2019 a workshop was held in Rankin Inlet in order to identify Arctic char research interests and commercial fisheries development priorities for each Kivalliq community. The workshop, attended by representatives from each Kivalliq HTO, the GN, NWMB and DFO, identified a desire by the communities to resolve Arctic Char diet from Kivalliq stocks. A community-based sampling program was proposed where funding from DFO would be provided to support 50 samples from selected waterbodies in each community. Additionally, the workshop participants were interested in further consideration of commercial fisheries development. Results from the 2019 assessment of diet suggest that Arctic char in the Kivalliq region are highly opportunistic feeders with over 90 different items identified among all samples assessed. The most common prey item found in the stomachs of Arctic char was a the amphipod Themisto libellula. Arctic cod were also an important prey item contributing the most by weight to the diet of Arctic char in the region. Fisheries Management engaged with Kivalliq Arctic Foods, and met with stakeholders in Rankin Inlet, Chesterfield Inlet, Whale Cove where the fish plant is currently actively involved in commercial harvesting. -
Hansard Thursday, April 1, 1999
Nunavut Canada LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NUNAVUT 1st Session 1st Assembly HANSARD Official Report THURSDAY, APRIL 1, 1999 Legislative Assembly of Nunavut Members of the Legislative Assembly Mr. Ovide Alakannuark Mr. Hunter Tootoo Mr. Levi Barnabas (Akulliq) (Iqaluit Centre) (Quttiktuq) Mr. Enoki Irqittuq Mr. Ed Picco Mr. Jack Anawak (Amittuq) (Iqaluit East) (Rankin Inlet North) Mr. Kevin O'Brien Mr. Paul Okalik Ms. Manitok Thompson (Arviat) (Iqaluit West) (Rankin Inlet South-Whale Cove) Mr. Glenn McLean Mr. Donald Havioyak (Baker Lake) (Kugluktuk) Mr. Olayuk Akesuk (South Baffin) Mr. Kelvin Ng Mr. James Arvaluk (Cambridge Bay) (Nanulik) Mr. Jobie Nutarak (Tunnuniq) Mr. Peter Kattuk Mr. Uriash Puqiqnak (Hudson Bay) (Nattilik) Mr. David Iqaqrialu (Uqqummiut) Mr. Peter Kilabuk (Pangnirtung) Officers Clerk John Quirke Deputy Clerk Clerk of Committees Law Clerk Sergeant at Arms Editors of Hansard Rhoda Perkison Nancy Tupik Susan Cooper Simon Nattaq Innirvik Support Services Box 1200 Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 0H0 Tel (867) 979-6770 Fax (867) 979-6811 Toll-Free (877) 334-7266 Table of Contents Adoption of Rules of the Legislative Assembly............................................1 Election of Speaker .....................................................................................2 Remarks by Speaker ...................................................................................2 Presentation of Mace...................................................................................4 Commissioner's Address .............................................................................5 -
Background: Southampton Island Caribou Have Declined Approx
SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR Information: Decision: X Issue: Request a decision to lower the current Southampton Island caribou TAH of 1,000 caribou to 800 caribou for the 2013/14 Harvesting season. Background: Southampton Island caribou have declined approx. 80% between 1997 & 2013 largely due to an observed reduction in pregnancy rates from 80% in 2000, to 40% in 2011. In addition, the inter-territorial sale of caribou meat speed the decline in recent years. DOE originally used the commercial harvest as a herd management tool during times of over abundance by setting quotas based on survey findings. Now it’s the reproductive disease Brucella suis in combination with the harvest based on export for money by individual harvesters that threatens the population. Caribou Survey Results For Southampton Island (1967 to 2013) ( +/- 95% Confidence Limits ) 35000 30000 30,381 25000 20,582 20000 18,275 17,981 15,452 15000 13,700 13,956 10000 9,000 7,902 Estimated Number of Caribou of Number Estimated 7,287 5000 5,400 1,200 40 0 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Survey Year Figure 1 Survey history of the Southampton Island Caribou Herd from introduction in 1968 to the most recent survey in May 2013. 1 Current Status The June 2013 survey estimated 7,287 +/- 1,045 (95% CI) adult caribou (preliminary estimate subject to change), 616 caribou less then the June 2011 estimate of 7,903 +/- 1,261 (95% CI).