Hangyák Taxonómiai És Faunisztikai Vizsgálata a Kárpát-Medencében (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hangyák Taxonómiai És Faunisztikai Vizsgálata a Kárpát-Medencében (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Természettudományi Kar Környezettudományi doktori iskola, Természetvédelmi Ökológia program ______________________________________________________________________________ Hangyák taxonómiai és faunisztikai vizsgálata a Kárpát-medencében (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – doktori dolgozat – Cs ősz Sándor témavezet ő: Dr. Gallé László Tanszékvezet ő egyetemi tanár, SZTE, Ökológiai Tanszék Szeged 2006 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK : I. BEVEZETÉS ................................................................................................................ 3 II. TÖRTÉNETI ÁTTEKINTÉS ..................................................................................... 5 III. A MEGVIZSGÁLT ANYAG ......................................................................................... 9 IV. MORFOMETRIKUS VIZSGÁLATOK ÉS STATISZTIKAI ANALÍZIS ................... 11 1. BEVEZETÉS .............................................................................................................11 2. A LINEÁRIS DISZKRIMINANCIA ANALÍZIS (L INEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSE , LDA) ÉS ALKALMAZÁSA ......................................................................................................12 3. AZ ALLOMETRIA ÉS A TESTMÉRET HATÁSÁNAK ELTÁVOLÍTÁSA ...............................15 V. TÁRGYALÁS ............................................................................................................... 19 1. A K ÁRPÁT –MEDENCE MYRMICA FAJAINAK TAXONÓMIAI FELDOLGOZÁSA ..............19 1. Bevezető és célkitűzések....................................................................................................19 2. Anyag és módszer...............................................................................................................19 3. Eredmények.........................................................................................................................20 4. Kapcsolódó tuományos közlemények...........................................................................23 2. A K ÁRPÁT -MEDENCE PONERINAE FAJAINAK FELDOLGOZÁSA ............................... 24 1. Bevezetés és célkitűzések...................................................................................................24 2. A Ponera testacea EMERY 1895 újraleírása..........................................................................24 a) Anyag és módszer..................................................................................................................24 b) Eredmények ...........................................................................................................................25 3. Kárpát-medencei Ponerinae fajok határozója ................................................................28 a) Anyag és módszer..................................................................................................................28 b) Eredmények ...........................................................................................................................28 4. Kapcsolódó tuományos közlemények...........................................................................30 3. A K ÁRPÁT -MEDENCE TETRAMORIUM FAJAINAK FELDOLGOZÁSA ...........................31 1. Bevezetés és célkitűzések...................................................................................................31 2. A Tetramorium hungaricum RÖSZLER , 1935 újraleírása .....................................................32 a) Bevezetés és célkit űzések .......................................................................................................32 b) Anyag és módszer..................................................................................................................32 c) Eredmények................................................................................................................................34 d) Kapcsolódó tudományos közlemények...................................................................................35 3. A Tetramorium chefketi fajcsoport Palaearktikus revíziója ...............................................36 a) Bevezetés és célkit űzések .......................................................................................................36 b) Anyag és módszer..................................................................................................................37 c) Metrikus vizsgálatok és értékelés ...............................................................................................37 d) Eredmények ...........................................................................................................................38 1 CSŐSZ S.: Hangyák taxonómiai és faunisztikai vizsgálata a Kárpát-medencében Tartalomjegyzék 4. A kapcsolódó tuományos közlemények ........................................................................46 VI. FAUNISZTIKAI VIZSGÁLATOK A KÁRPÁT-MEDENCÉBEN ............................ 47 1. A HAZAI FAJLISTA ÖSSZEÁLLÍTÁSA ..........................................................................47 1. Bevezetés és Célkitűzések..................................................................................................47 2. Eredmények.........................................................................................................................47 3. A kapcsolódó tuományos közlemények ........................................................................47 2. KÁRPÁT -MEDENCEI HANGYÁK ÚJ FAJJEGYZÉKE (2006)...........................................49 1. Bevezetés..............................................................................................................................49 2. A kapcsolódó tuományos közlemények ........................................................................49 VII. A KÁRPÁT-MEDENCEI HANGYAFAJOK FELSOROLÁSA ................................ 50 1. PROCERATIINAE ALCSALÁD ....................................................................................50 1. Proceratiini ...........................................................................................................................50 2. PONERINAE ALCSALÁD ...........................................................................................50 1. Ponerini ................................................................................................................................50 3. MYRMICINAE ALCSALÁD ........................................................................................51 1. Dacetini.................................................................................................................................51 2. Myrmicini .............................................................................................................................51 3. Myrmecinini .........................................................................................................................54 4. Pheiolini..............................................................................................................................54 5. Stenammini ..........................................................................................................................54 6. Crematogastrini ...................................................................................................................55 7. Solenopsidini........................................................................................................................55 8. Formicoxenini......................................................................................................................56 9. Tetramoriini .........................................................................................................................59 4. DOLICHODERINAE ALCSALÁD ................................................................................60 1. Dolichoderini.......................................................................................................................60 5. FORMICINAE ALCSALÁD .........................................................................................61 1. Plagiolepidini........................................................................................................................61 2. Camponotini ........................................................................................................................62 3. Lasiini....................................................................................................................................64 4. Formicini ..............................................................................................................................67 VIII. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 73 IX. IRODALOMJEGYZÉK ............................................................................................... 77 X. MELLÉKLET .............................................................................................................. 92 2 CSŐSZ S.: Hangyák taxonómiai és faunisztikai vizsgálata a Kárpát-medencében Bevezetés I. BEVEZETÉS A hazai hangyakutatás hosszú ideig kevés számú kutatóra épült, így az utóbbi évek során rengeteg tennivaló halmozódott fel az egyre nagyobb számú mürmekológus szakemberek számára. Egyik legfontosabb teend őként a hazai ill. a kárpát–medencei hangyák faunisztikai és taxonómiai célú vizsgálatát említeném, ami a további kutatások számára alapvet ő fontosságú. F ő érdekl ődési területem a hangyák (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) taxonómiája, szisztematikája és biogeográfiája.
Recommended publications
  • Iberomyrmex 7 2015.Pdf
    Asociación Ibérica de Mirmecología , diciembre 2015 ISSN 1989-7928 Asociación Ibérica de Mirmecología Iberomyrmex nº 7 www.mirmiberica.org Iberomyrmex. Número 7, diciembre 2015 IBEROMYRMEX Boletín de la Asociación Ibérica de Mirmecología Publicación anual de acceso gratuito. Disponible en “http://www.mirmiberica.org/iberomyrmex” Número 7. Fecha: 31 de diciembre de 2015. Asociación Ibérica de Mirmecología “www.mirmiberica.org” ISSN 1989-7928 Título clave: Iberomyrmex Tít. abreviado: Iberomyrmex Diseño y maquetación del presente volumen: Amonio David Cuesta Segura, excepto portada y contraportada: Natalia Arnedo Rodríguez. Editor del presente volumen: Sílvia Abril Meléndez. Asesor lingüístico: Pedro Peña Varó. Revisores de los trabajos del presente volumen (por orden alfabético de los apellidos): Sílvia Abril, Xavier Espadaler, Crisanto Gómez y Joaquín Reyes. Nota de copyright © AIM, 2015; © Los autores, 2015; Los originales publicados en la edición electrónica de Iberomyrmex son propiedad de la Asociación Ibérica de Mirmecología y de los propios autores, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total. Salvo que se indique lo contrario, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento- No Comercial 3.0 España” (CC-by-nc). Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario. Normas de publicación: http://www.mirmiberica.org/iberomyrmex Envío de manuscritos: “[email protected]” Los autores se responsabilizan de las opiniones contenidas en los artículos y comunicaciones. Artículos y notas Artículos y notas Artículos y notas Artículos y notas Artículos y notas Artículos y notas Artículos y notas Artículos Artículos y notasy notas Artículos y notas Artículos Iberomyrmex.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Ecological Indicators 13 (2012) 303–313 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Indicators jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind Life-history strategies as a tool to identify conservation constraints: A case-study ଝ on ants in chalk grasslands a,b,∗ c d a,b,1 C.G.E. (Toos) van Noordwijk , Peter Boer , A.A. (Bram) Mabelis , Wilco C.E.P. Verberk , b,d Henk Siepel a Bargerveen Foundation, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands b Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute of Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands c Gemene Bos 12, 1861 HG Bergen, The Netherlands d Centre for Ecosystem Studies, Alterra, Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Species’ life-history traits underlie species–environment relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Succession in Ant Communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Deciduous Forest Clear-Cuts – an Eastern European Case Study
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 92–100, 2017 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2017.013 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Succession in ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in deciduous forest clear-cuts – an Eastern European case study IOAN TĂUŞAN 1, JENS DAUBER 2, MARIA R. TRICĂ1 and BÁLINT MARKÓ 3 1 Department of Environmental Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu; Applied Ecology Research Centre, Dr. Raţiu 5-7, 550012 Sibiu, Romania; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Thünen Institute of Biodiversity, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Bundesallee 50, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Clinicilor 5-7, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Key words. Hymenoptera, Formicidae, ants, deciduous forests, secondary succession, clear-cutting, community structure, pitfall traps Abstract. Clear-cutting, the main method of harvesting in many forests in the world, causes a series of dramatic environmental changes to the forest habitat and removes habitat resources for arboreal and epigeal species. It results in considerable changes in the composition of both plant and animal communities. Ants have many critical roles in the maintenance and functioning of forest ecosystems. Therefore, the response of ants to clear-cutting and the time it takes for an ant community to recover after clear- cutting are important indicators of the effect of this harvesting technique on the forest ecosystem. We investigated ground-dwelling ant communities during secondary succession of deciduous forests in Transylvania, Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Freilanduntersuchungen
    Ökologie der Kerbameise Coptoformica forsslundi LOHMANDER, 1949 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, genus Formica, subgenus Coptoformica) an ihrem norddeutschen Vorkommen Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Dr. rer. nat. genehmigte Dissertation von Uwe Sörensen geboren am 25. 12. 1954 in Bredstedt 2004 Referent: Prof. Dr. Klaus Wächtler, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Rudolf Abraham, Universität Hamburg Tag der Promotion: 09. 02. 2004 Datum der Veröffentlichung: April 2004 In Dankbarkeit meinen Eltern Marga und Jürgen Sörensen Inhaltsverzeichnis 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis Schlagwörter/ Keywords .......................................................................... S. 004 Abbildungs-, Tabellen- und Abkürzungsverzeichnis .............................. S. 005 1. Einleitung ....................................................................................... S. 008 2. Das Untersuchungsgebiet ............................................................. S. 011 3. Material und Methoden ................................................................ S. 018 4. Ergebnisse ...................................................................................... S. 021 4.1 Charakterisierung der Kerbameise Coptoformica forsslundi ... S. 021 4.1.1 Bemerkungen zum subgenus Coptoformica Mueller, 1923 .................... S. 021 4.1.2 Die Verbreitung von C. forsslundi ........................................................... S. 025 4.1.3 Morphologische Beschreibung
    [Show full text]
  • Stings of Some Species of Lordomynna and Mayriella (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 11, Nos. 3-4, September-December, 1997 193 Stings of some species of Lordomynna and Mayriella (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) Charles Kugler Biology Department, Radford University, Radford, VA 24142 Abstract: The sting apparatus and pygidium are described for eight of20 Lordomyrma species and one of five Mayriella species. The apparatus of L. epinotaiis is distinctly different from that of other Lordomyrma species. Comparisons with other genera suggest affinities of species of Lordomymw to species of Cyphoidris and Lachnomyrmex, while Mayriella abstinens Forel shares unusual features with those of P/'Oattct butteli. Introduction into two halves and a separate sting. The stings were mounted in glycerin jelly for ease of precise This paper describes the sting apparatus in positioning and repositioning for different views. eight species of Lordomyrma that were once mem- The other sclerites were usually mounted in Cana- bers of four different genera. The stings of five da balsam. Lordomyrma species were partially described by Voucher specimens identified with the label Kugler (1978), but at the time three were consid- "Kugler 1995 Dissection voucher" or "Voucher spec- ered to be in the genus Prodicroaspis or Promera­ imen, Kugler study 1976" are deposited in the noplus (Promeranoplus rouxi Emery, one an unde- Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mas- termined species of Promeranoplus, and Prodi­ sachusetts. croaspis sarasini Emery). These genera are now Most preparations were drawn and measured considered synonyms of Lordomyrma (Bolldobler using a Zeiss KF-2 phase contrast microscope with and Wilson 1990, p. 14; Bolton 1994, p. 106). In an ocular grid. Accuracy is estimated at plus or addi tion, during a revision of Rogeria (Kugler 1994) minus O.OOlmm at 400X magnification.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphaenogaster Muelleriana Wolf, 1915 (Hymenoptera Formi- Cidae)
    Biodiversity Journal , 2017, 8 (1): 3–8 Aphaenogaster muelleriana Wolf, 1915 (Hymenoptera Formi - cidae) in Salento (South East Italy) Antonio Scupola Museo Storia Naturale di Verona, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Workers of the ant Aphaenogaster muelleriana Wolf, 1915 (Hymenoptera Formicidae) have been found in Salento (apulia, South East Italy) for the first time. also, this record represents the first citation for the Italian peninsular territory. New Italian localities for A. splendida spe - cies-group are given here. KEY WORDS ants; Aphaenogaster muelleriana ; A. ovaticeps ; A. splendida ; first citation, Formicidae, Italy. received 23.12.2016; accepted 05.02.2017; printed 30.03.2017 INTRODUCTION Naturale di Milano, Italy; MSNV: Museo di Storia Naturale di Verona, Italy; VGPC: Vincenzo Gentile In July 2016 during my myrmecological re- personal collection (Napoli, Italy). searches in Salento (South apulia) I had the chance Measurements were taken by means of an ocular to collect some specimens of the nocturnal Aphaeno- graticule mounted on Leica MB3 stereomicroscope gaster (Attomyrma ) muelleriana Wolf, 1915 (Hy - at 60X magnification. The measures are express in menoptera Formicidae Myrmicinae Stenammini). mm; The following acronyms have been used: CL This Balkan ant species was up to now virtually (cephalic length, measured from the anterior edge unknown on the Italian mainland, having only two of the clypeus to the posterior border of the head); historical records reporting localities close to the CW (maximum width of the head, measured imme - Slovenian borders. The Salentinian specimens rep- diately after the eyes); SC (scapus length, measured resent the first citation for apulia and for the entire without the basal condyle); CI (cephalic index: Italian peninsular territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of CO2 Carbon Stable Isotope Analysis to Ant Trophic Ecology: Preliminary Results
    This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Application of CO2 carbon stable isotope analysis to ant trophic ecology: preliminary results, which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12983. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. 1 Application of CO2 carbon stable isotope analysis to ant trophic 2 ecology: preliminary results 3 4 Paride Balzani1,*, Stefania Venturi2,3, Daniela Muzzicato1, Franco Tassi2,3, Orlando Vaselli2,3, 5 Filippo Frizzi1, Clara Frasconi Wendt1,4, Barbara Nisi3, Alberto Masoni1, Giacomo Santini1 6 7 8 1 Department of Biology, University of Florence, via Madonna del Piano 6, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 9 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Florence, via la Pira 4, Firenze, Italy 10 3 Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources (IGG), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 11 via la Pira 4, Firenze, Italy 12 4 Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 13 C2, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal 14 15 16 * Corresponding author: Paride Balzani, Department of Biology, University of Florence, via 17 Madonna del Piano 6, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy, e-mail: [email protected] 18 19 Short title: CO2 isotopes in ants 20 21 Keywords: diet reconstruction, feeding preferences, omnivores, generalist species, breath tests, 22 metabolism, respiration 23 24 25 Abstract 26 Stable isotope analysis of animal tissues is commonly used to infer diet and trophic position. 27 However, it requires destructive sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazards for Nature? Avalanches As a Promotor of Biodiversity. a Case Study on the Invertebrate Fauna in the Gesäuse National Park (Styria, Austria)
    5th Symposium Conference Volume for Research in Protected Areas pages 389 - 398 10 to 12 June 2013, Mittersill Natural Hazards – Hazards for Nature? Avalanches as a promotor of biodiversity. A case study on the invertebrate fauna in the Gesäuse National Park (Styria, Austria) Christian Komposch, Thomas Frieß & Daniel Kreiner Abstract Avalanches are feared by humans and considered “catastrophic” due to their unpredictable and destructive force. But this anthropocentric perspective fails to capture the potential ecological value of these natural disturbances. The Gesäuse National Park is a model-region for investigations of such highly dynamic events because of its distinct relief and extreme weather conditions. This project aims to record and analyse the animal assemblages in these highly dynamic habitats as well as document succession and population structure. 1) Dynamic processes lead to one of the very few permanent and natural vegetationless habitat types in Central Europe outside the alpine zone – i. e. screes and other rocky habitats at various successional stages. In addition to the tight mosaic distribution of a variety of habitats over larger areas, avalanche tracks also offer valuable structures like dead wood and rocks. Remarkable is the sympatric occurrence of the three harvestmen species Trogulus tricarinatus, T. nepaeformis und T. tingiformis, a species diversity peak of spiders, true-bugs and ants; and the newly recorded occurrence of Formica truncorum. 2) The presence of highly adapted species and coenoses reflect the extreme environmental conditions, specific vegetation cover and microclimate of these habitats. Several of the recorded taxa are rare, endangered and endemic. The very rare dwarf spider Trichoncus hackmani is a new record for Styria and the stenotopic and critically endangered wolf-spider Acantholycosa lignaria is dependent on lying dead wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Myrmecophily of Maculinea Butterflies in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
    ettudom sz án é y m ológia i r n i é e h K c a s T e r T Myrmecophily of Maculinea butterflies in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) A Maculinea boglárkalepkék mirmekofíliája a Kárpát- medencében (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) PhD Thesis Tartally András Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology University of Debrecen Debrecen, 2008. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem TTK Biológia Tudományok Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem TTK doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2008.01.07. Tartally András Tanúsítom, hogy Tartally András doktorjelölt 2001-2005 között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javaslom. Debrecen, 2008.01.07. Dr. Varga Zoltán egyetemi tanár In memory of my grandparents Table of contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................... 9 1.1. Myrmecophily of Maculinea butterflies........................................................ 9 1.2. Why is it important to know the local host ant species?.............................. 9 1.3. The aim of this study.................................................................................... 10 2. Materials and Methods..................................................................... 11 2.1. Taxonomy and nomenclature.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    ANNALS OF THE UPPER SILESIAN MUSEUM IN BYTOM ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 27 (online 008): 1–51 ISSN 0867-1966, eISSN 2544-039X (online) Bytom, 11.12.2018 SEBASTIAN SALATA1 , LECH BOROWIEC2 Taxonomic and faunistic notes on Greek ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2199191 1 Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bukowska 19, 60-809 Poznań, Poland 2 Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Taxonomy, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego 65, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland e-mail: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] Abstract: Cataglyphis cretica (FOREL, 1910) is raised to species rank and redescribed. The following synonymies are proposed: Lepisiota nigra (DALLA TORRE, 1893) = Lepisiota splendens KARAVAIEV, 1912 syn. nov.; Camponotus boghossiani FOREL, 1911 = Camponotus boghossiani stenoticus EMERY, 1915 syn. nov.; Camponotus oertzeni FOREL, 1889 = Camponotus andrius DALLA TORRE, 1893 syn. nov., = Campnotus oertzeni kappariensis DALLA TORRE, 1893 syn. nov. Gynes of Aphaenogaster aktaci KIRAN & TEZCAN, 2008, Temnothorax angustifrons Csősz, Heinze & Mikó, 2015, Temnothorax dessyi (MENOZZI, 1936), Temnothorax kemali (SANTSCHI, 1934), Temnothorax smyrnensis (FOREL, 1911) and Temnothorax solerii (MENOZZI, 1936) are described for the first time. Aphaenogaster aktaci KIRAN & TEZCAN, 2008 and Temnothorax kemali (SANTSCHI, 1934) are new to Europe and Greece. New records for 10 species and an updated checklist of 315 species or morphospecies occurring in Greece is given. Key words: redescription, new status, species new to Europe, species new to Greece, ants, Greece. INTRODUCTION Ant fauna of Greece has been intensively studied in recent years. The first impulse for studies on Greek ant fauna was the publication of a checklist by LEGAKIS (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Czech Republic Aktualizovaný Seznam Mravenců (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) České Republiky
    5 Werner, Bezděčka, Bezděčková, Pech: Aktualizovaný seznam mravenců (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) České republiky Acta rerum naturalium, 22: 5–12, 2018 ISSN 2336-7113 (Online), ISSN 1801-5972 (Print) An updated checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of the Czech Republic Aktualizovaný seznam mravenců (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) České republiky PETR WERNER1, PAVEL BEZDĚČKA2, KLÁRA BEZDĚČKOVÁ2, PAVEL PECH3 1 Gabinova 823, CZ-152 00 Praha 5; e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author); 2 Muzeum Vysočiny Jihlava, Masarykovo náměstí 55, CZ-586 01 Jihlava; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]; 3 Přírodovědecká fakulta, Univerzita Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, CZ-500 03 Hradec Králové; email: [email protected] Publikováno on-line 25. 07. 2018 Abstract: In this paper an updated critical checklist of the ants of the Czech Republic is provided. A total of 111 valid names of outdoor species are listed based on data from museum and private collections. Over the past decade several faunistic and taxonomic changes concerning the Czech ant fauna have occurred. The species Formica clara Forel, 1886, Lasius carniolicus Mayr, 1861, Temnothorax jailensis (Arnol’di, 1977) and Tetramorium hungaricum Röszler, 1935 were recorded on the Czech territory for the first time. Further, the presence of Camponotus atricolor (Nylander, 1849) and Lasius myops Forel, 1894, formerly regarded as uncertain, was confirmed. Moreover, the status of Tetramorium staerckei Kratochvíl, 1944 was reviewed as a species. Besides outdoor species, a list of five indoor (introduced) species is given. Abstrakt: Práce obsahuje aktualizovaný seznam mravenců České republiky. Na základě údajů získaných z muzejních a soukromých sbírek je uvedeno celkem 111 volně žijících druhů.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Spatial Structure and Habitat Use of Large Blue Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
    POPULATION SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND HABITAT USE OF LARGE BLUE BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) HANGYABOGLÁRKA LEPKÉK (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) TÉRBELI POPULÁCIÓSZERKEZETE ÉS ÉLHELYHASZNÁLATA Doktori (PhD) értekezés KRÖSI ÁDÁM Témavezet DR. VARGA ZOLTÁN Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2009 Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem TTK Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem TTK doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2009. szeptember 30. Krösi Ádám Tanúsítom, hogy Krösi Ádám doktorjelölt 2003–2009 között a Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javaslom. Debrecen, 2009. szeptember 30. Dr. Varga Zoltán POPULATION SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND HABITAT USE OF LARGE BLUE BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) HANGYABOGLÁRKA LEPKÉK (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) TÉRBELI POPULÁCIÓSZERKEZETE ÉS ÉLHELYHASZNÁLATA Értekezés a doktori (Ph.D.) fokozat megszerzése érdekében a BIOLÓGIA tudományágban Írta: Krösi Ádám okleveles alkalmazott zoológus Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás doktori programjának keretében Témavezet: Dr. Varga Zoltán Sándor A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Dr. Dévai György tagok: Dr. Gallé László Dr. Lengyel Szabolcs A doktori szigorlat idpontja: 2009.03.23. Az értekezés bírálói: Dr. Dr. A bírálóbizottság: elnök: Dr.
    [Show full text]