Marrawah Skipper)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marrawah Skipper) This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 2 February 2011 Approved Conservation Advice for Oreisplanus munionga larana (Marrawah skipper) (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Oreisplanus munionga larana, Family Hesperiidae, also known as the Marrawah skipper, is a brightly coloured skipper. Skippers are usually considered to be butterflies, but are intermediate between butterflies and moths. This subspecies is rich caramel above with pale yellow wing markings and pale yellow below. The females tend to be larger, slightly paler and more yellowish on the underside (Couchman, 1962; Braby, 2000). The species is found as two subspecies, Oreisplanus munionga munionga found in the mountains of New South Wales and Victoria and Oreisplanus munionga larana found on the north-west coast of Tasmania (Braby, 2000). Conservation Status The Marrawah skipper is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as it has a limited geographic distribution which is precarious for its survival due to severe fragmentation and ongoing threats (TSSC, 2010). The species is listed as endangered under the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995. Distribution and Habitat The Marrawah skipper is endemic to Tasmania, occurring only in far north-western to western Tasmania with disjunct locations on the north coast at Stanley (probably extinct) and south of Penguin (about 77 km east of Stanley). The species is known from 14 populations with an estimated extent of occurrence of 3710 km2, although this could be smaller if large areas of unsuitable habitat are excluded. It has an estimated area of occupancy of 0.2 km2, and estimated total population size of less than 10 000 (Neyland, 1994). This species occurs within the King IBRA Bioregion and the North West Natural Resource Management Region. The other subspecies, Oreisplanus munionga munionga, is found in the mountains of New South Wales and Victoria. The distribution of this species is not known to overlap with any EPBC Act-listed threatened ecological community. Threats The main identified threats to the Marrawah skipper are cattle grazing and clearance of habitat to create intensively managed grazing ground (Bell, 2002; Harris and Kitchener, 2005). Other threats include inappropriate disturbance regimes from slashing, weed invasion, fire and recreation. The main potential threat to some parts of the species’ range is loss of habitat due to land clearing for forestry operations (Bell, 2002). Oreisplanus munionga larana (Marrawah skipper) Conservation Advice Page 1 of 4 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 2 February 2011 Research Priorities Research priorities that would inform future regional and local priority actions include: Design and implement a monitoring program or, if appropriate, support and enhance existing programs. More precisely assess population size, distribution, ecological requirements and the relative impacts of threatening processes. Undertake survey work in suitable habitat and potential habitat to locate any additional populations/occurrences/remnants. Regional Priority Actions The following regional priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of the Marrawah skipper. Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification Monitor known populations to identify key threats. Monitor the progress of recovery, including the effectiveness of management actions and the need to adapt them if necessary. Identify populations of high conservation priority. Ensure there is no disturbance in areas where the Marrawah skipper occurs, excluding necessary actions to manage the conservation of the species. Investigate formal conservation arrangements, management agreements and covenants on private land, and for crown and private land investigate inclusion in reserve tenure if possible. Invasive Weeds Develop and implement a management plan for the control of Cirsium arvense and other identified weeds in the region. Ensure chemicals or other mechanisms used to eradicate weeds do not have a significant adverse impact on the Marrawah skipper. Fire Develop and implement a suitable fire management strategy for the habitat of the Marrawah skipper. Identify appropriate intensity and interval of fire to promote seed germination and/or vegetation regeneration of Carex appressa. Where appropriate provide maps of known occurrences to local and state Rural Fire Services and seek inclusion of mitigative measures in bush fire risk management plan(s), risk register and/or operation maps. Conservation Information Raise awareness of the Marrawah skipper within the local community. Maintain liaison with private landholders and land managers of land on which populations occur. Enable Recovery of Additional Sites and/or Populations Investigate options for linking, enhancing or establishing additional populations. Local Priority Actions The following local priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of the Marrawah skipper. Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification Control access routes to suitably constrain public access to known sites on public land. Suitably control and manage access on private land. Minimise adverse impacts from land use at known sites. Protect populations of the listed species through the development of conservation agreements and/or covenants. Oreisplanus munionga larana (Marrawah skipper) Conservation Advice Page 2 of 4 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 2 February 2011 Invasive Weeds Identify and remove weeds in the local area, which could become a threat to the Marrawah skipper, using appropriate methods. Manage sites to prevent introduction of invasive weeds, which could become a threat to the Marrawah skipper, using appropriate methods. Trampling, Browsing or Grazing If livestock grazing occurs in the area, ensure land owners/managers use an appropriate management regime and density that does not detrimentally affect this species’ habitat. Where appropriate, manage total grazing pressure at important/significant sites through exclusion fencing or other barriers on private land, state and public reserves, conservation areas, and state forests. Fire Implement an appropriate fire management regime for local populations. This list does not necessarily encompass all actions that may be of benefit to the Marrawah skipper, but highlights those that are considered to be of highest priority at the time of preparing the Conservation Advice. Information Sources: Bell P (2002). Survey of known sites and potential habitat for the Marrawah skipper in northwest Tasmania. RD&M for Threatened Species Unit, Nature Conservation Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Bell P and Miller B (2005). Marrawah skipper discovered at Penguin. Forest Practices News 6(4): 1–2. Braby MF (2000). Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution. CSIRO, Melbourne. Couchman LE (1962). Notes on some Tasmanian and Australian Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 96: 73–81. Couchman LE (1965). Notes on some Tasmanian and Australian Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. II. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 99: 81–85. Couchman LE and Couchman R (1978). The butterflies of Tasmania. Tasmanian Year Book 11: 66–96. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (DPIWE) (1998). Strategic plan for the private land component of the CAR reserve system. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (DPIWE) (2005). Threatened native vegetation communities list (Version 6.0) November 2005. Available on the Internet at: http://www.dpiwe.tas.gov.au/inter.nsf/WebPages/AWAH–6547ZL?open. Forest Practices Board (FPB) (2000). Forest practices code 2000. Forest Practices Board, Hobart. Forest Practices Authority (FPA) (2006). Threatened fauna manual for wood production forests in Tasmania – online database. Available on the Internet at: http://www.fpa.tas.gov.au/index.php?id=82. Harris S and Kitchener A (editors) (2005). From forest to fjaeldmark: descriptions of Tasmania’s vegetation. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Oreisplanus munionga larana (Marrawah skipper) Conservation Advice Page 3 of 4 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 2 February 2011 McQuillan P (1994). Butterflies of Tasmania. Tasmanian Field Naturalists Club Inc., Hobart, Tasmania. Neyland M (1994). The ecology and conservation status of three rare Hesperiid butterflies in Tasmania. Wildlife Report 94/3, Parks and Wildlife Service, Tasmania. Neyland M (2001). Ecology and conservation of the Marrawah skipper (Oreiplanus munionga) in Tasmania. The Tasmanian Naturalist 123: 48–56. Orr S and Gerrand AM (1998). Management decision classification: a system for zoning land managed by Forestry Tasmania. Tasforests 10: 1–14. Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS) (2002). Arthur–Pieman conservation area: management plan. Parks and Wildlife Service, Hobart. Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS) (2003). Arthur–Pieman conservation area: fire management plan. Parks and Wildlife Service, Hobart. Parks and Wildlife Service, Forestry Tasmania and Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (PWS, FT & DPIWE) (2003). Tasmanian Reserve Management Code of Practice. Department of Tourism, Parks, Heritage and the Arts, Hobart. Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) (2010). Oreisplanus munionga larana (Marrawah skipper) listing advice. Oreisplanus munionga larana (Marrawah skipper) Conservation Advice Page 4 of 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Science for Saving Species Research Findings Factsheet Project 2.1
    Science for Saving Species Research findings factsheet Project 2.1 Butterflies on the brink: identifying the Australian butterflies most at risk of extinction In brief Background Terrestrial invertebrates and their Invertebrates are declining globally in high (greater than 30%) chance of habitats are increasingly threatened both diversity and abundance, with extinction. We also identified key by human disturbances, particularly potentially serious consequences threatening processes affecting habitat loss and fragmentation, for ecosystem functioning. Many these species (chiefly inappropriate invasive species, inappropriate fire Australian butterflies are imperilled fire regimes, habitat loss and regimes and climate change. or declining but few are listed fragmentation, invasive species and Continuing declines and extinctions for protection by legislation. climate change), and the research in native terrestrial invertebrate We identified the 26 Australian and management actions needed communities are likely to negatively butterflies at most immediate risk to save them. Mapping of the 26 affect ecosystem functioning. This is of extinction within a 20-year time butterflies’ distributions revealed that because invertebrates play a central frame. We found that one butterfly most are now found only in a single role in many ecological processes, is facing a greater than 90% chance state or territory and many occupy including pollination, herbivory, the of extinction in the next 20 years narrow ranges. Increased resourcing consumption of dead plant and (and may already be extinct), and and management intervention is animal matter, and nutrient cycling, four species have a moderate to required to avert future extinctions. as well as providing a good source of food for other animals. There is urgent need to explore the causes of these declines, and the implications for ecosystems and ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Understorey Network News Spring 2006 in This Issue No
    Understorey Network News Spring 2006 In this Issue No. 36 Understories: Brighton Community Nursery Understorey to keep noisy miners at bay Threatened butterflies of Tasmania Tasmanian seed conservation centre What’s happening Contact Details Project Manager’s Report Enquiries, newsletter articles and memberships Its time to get your seeds into tubes, if you to: haven’t already done so! This round of the Growers Scheme has several interesting pro- jects requesting plants from volunteer growers. Ruth Mollison For example, growers are propagating plants Understorey Network for the large grazing farm ‘Murrayfields’, Project Manager owned by the aboriginal community and located Ph:6234 4286 Fax:6234 4286 on Bruny Island. Other project sites include a Mobile: 0407 352 479 penguin rookery on the Derwent Estuary and PO Box 4535 Bathurst Street Hobart 7000 Pipe Clay Lagoon in the north of the state. Office : 148B Elizabeth Street Hobart [email protected] Growing for projects is becoming a popular choice for members—please pass on any sug- gestions of suitable revegetation projects that Steering Committee Members are happening in your area, as we need sites President: Anne Griffiths across the state, to match up with local grow- Vice-President: Joan Rodrigues ers. Secretary: Mary Jolly Treasurer: Rupert Manners The feedback I have received from the Autumn Committee members: Brian Griffiths, Liz Quin, growing season is that seeds were very slow Peter McGlone, Warner Wait, Kris Schaffer, germinating, although some species, notably Angela Jackson. lilies and buzzies, grew well. With this in mind, the next Autumn growing season will be focused on cuttings for ‘specialist’ needs, such as salt- Visit our website and Plant Propagation bush for coastal or saline sites, or division of Database at: sedges/rushes for wetlands etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species Protection Act 1995
    Contents (1995 - 83) Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 Long Title Part 1 - Preliminary 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Interpretation 4. Objectives to be furthered 5. Administration of public authorities 6. Crown to be bound Part 2 - Administration 7. Functions of Secretary 8. Scientific Advisory Committee 9. Community Review Committee Part 3 - Conservation of Threatened Species Division 1 - Threatened species strategy 10. Threatened species strategy 11. Procedure for making strategy 12. Amendment and revocation of strategy Division 2 - Listing of threatened flora and fauna 13. Lists of threatened flora and fauna 14. Notification by Minister and right of appeal 15. Eligibility for listing 16. Nomination for listing 17. Consideration of nomination by SAC 18. Preliminary recommendation by SAC 19. Final recommendation by SAC 20. CRC to be advised of public notification 21. Minister's decision Division 3 - Listing statements 22. Listing statements Division 4 - Critical habitats 23. Determination of critical habitats 24. Amendment and revocation of determinations Division 5 - Recovery plans for threatened species 25. Recovery plans 26. Amendment and revocation of recovery plans Division 6 - Threat abatement plans 27. Threat abatement plans 28. Amendment and revocation of threat abatement plans Division 7 - Land management plans and agreements 29. Land management plans 30. Agreements arising from land management plans 31. Public authority management agreements Part 4 - Interim Protection Orders 32. Power of Minister to make interim protection orders 33. Terms of interim protection orders 34. Notice of order to landholder 35. Recommendation by Resource Planning and Development Commission 36. Notice to comply 37. Notification to other Ministers 38. Limitation of licences, permits, &c., issued under other Acts 39.
    [Show full text]
  • From Mainland Southeastern Australia, with Ar
    © The Authors, 2018. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2018 Records of the Australian Museum (2018) Vol. 70, issue number 5, pp. 423–433. ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) https://doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.70.2018.1715 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:62503ED7-0C67-4484-BCE7-E4D81E54A41B Michael F. Braby orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-587X A new subspecies of Neolucia hobartensis (Miskin, 1890) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from Mainland Southeastern Australia, with a Review of Butterfly Endemism in Montane Areas in this Region Michael F. Braby1* and Graham E. Wurtz2 1 Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton ACT 2601, Australia, and National Research Collections Australia, Australian National Insect Collection, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia 2 Thurgoona NSW 2640, Australia [email protected] Abstract. Neolucia hobartensis albolineata ssp. nov. is illustrated, diagnosed, described and compared with the nominate subspecies N. hobartensis hobartensis (Miskin, 1890) from Tasmania and N. hobartensis monticola Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914 from northern New South Wales, Australia. The new subspecies is restricted to montane areas (mainly >1000 m) in subalpine and alpine habitats on the mainland in southeastern Australia (southern NSW, ACT, VIC) where its larvae specialize on Epacris spp. (Ericaceae). It thus belongs to a distinct set of 22 butterfly taxa that are endemic and narrowly restricted to montane areas (>600 m, but mainly >900 m) on the tablelands and plateaus of mainland southeastern Australia. Monitoring of these taxa, including N. hobartensis ssp., is urgently required to assess the extent to which global climate change, particularly temperature rise and large-scale fire regimes, are key threatening processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Advice to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage from The
    The Minister included this species in the vulnerable category, effective from 4 March 2011 Advice to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on Amendments to the list of Threatened Species under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Scientific name (common name) Oreisplanus munionga larana (Marrawah skipper) The species is found as two subspecies, Oreisplanus munionga munionga found in the mountains of New South Wales and Victoria and Oreisplanus munionga larana found on the north-west coast of Tasmania. 2. Description The Marrawah skipper is a brightly coloured skipper. Skippers are usually considered to be butterflies, but are intermediate between butterflies and moths. This skipper is rich caramel above with pale yellow wing markings and pale yellow below. The females tend to be larger, slightly paler and more yellowish on the underside. The Marrawah skipper occurs in any vegetation types dominated by the native sedge Carex appressa or with an understorey dominated by C. appressa. Habitat includes remnant patches of C. appressa in disturbed areas such as those grazed by cattle or along drains. Eggs are laid on the leaves of C. appressa, which provides food and shelter for the larvae. All sites are at low altitudes and most are in very near coastal areas. 3. National Context The Marrawah skipper is endemic to Tasmania, occurring only in far north-western to western Tasmania with disjunct locations on the north coast at Stanley (probably extinct) and south of Penguin (about 77 km east from Stanley).
    [Show full text]
  • 16B. from Moonlight Jewels to Common Browns: Butterfly
    From Moonlight Jewels to Common Browns: Butterfly accounts for the ACT Suzi Bond1 and Michael Vardon2 1 Australian Bureau of Statistics, [email protected] 2 Australian National University, [email protected] Abstract We present a set of novel SEEA butterfly accounts for the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia. These accounts identify the theoretical and practical issues in producing biodiversity accounts and assess the implications of such biodiversity accounts for public policy and the management of species and public areas in the ACT and beyond. The accounts are to be used in ACT State of Environment reporting and considered for broader national biodiversity application. The butterfly accounts span from 1978 to 2018, and the data sources and methods underpinning the accounts are detailed in the paper. The accounts aim to eventually include butterfly species presence and abundance by habitat type and season for each survey year and between two points in time, butterfly species area of distribution by habitat and a land cover account. These types of biodiversity accounts will support the development of the SEEA-EEA framework and the UN ambition to elevate the system to an international standard. They demonstrate the flexibility of SEEA for presenting a range of ecosystem and environmental information. 1 1. Introduction The best method for including biodiversity in the System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA) has been a vexing question for more than a decade. The specific call for including biodiversity values in national accounts in Target 2 of the Biodiversity Strategy Plan (2011-2020) for the Convention on Biological Diversity provided an impetus for this work and also coincided with the processes for elevating the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (EEA) to an international statistical standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Marrawah Skipper
    Threatened Species Link www.tas.gov.au SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROFILE Oreisplanus munionga subsp. larana Marrawah Skipper Group: Arthropoda, Insecta (insects), Lepidoptera (butterflies, moths), Hesperiidae (Skippers) Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: endangered Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Vulnerable Endemic Found only in Tasmania Status: The Marrawah Skipper (Oreisplanus munionga subsp. larana) is a brightly coloured butterfly, rich caramel brown above with pale yellow wing marking and pale yellow below. The Marrawah Skipper is a subspecies which is endemic to Tasmania; another subspecies is found in alpine areas of mainland Australia. Known only from the coastal and near-coastal areas of the northwest coast of Tasmania, it is exclusively associated with the tussock-sedge Carex appressa, which is its larval host and food plant. Its habitat ranges from dense Carex appressa sedgeland (e.g. along drains and forest margins) and swamp forest to plantations and pasture. The main threats to the Marrawah Skipper are clearing of coastal and near-coastal habitat, further fragmentation of subpopulations, and inappropriate disturbance including cattle grazing, weed invasion and forestry. The objectives for managing this subspecies include protection of known subpopulations, location of other subpopulations, and increasing understanding of the species' ecology. A complete species management profile is not currently available for this species. Check for further information on this page and any relevant Activity Advice. Key Points Important: Is this species in your area? Do you need a permit? Ensure you’ve covered all the issues by checking the Planning Ahead page. Important: Different threatened species may have different requirements. For any activity you are considering, read the Activity Advice pages for background information and important advice about managing around the needs of multiple threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Forico HCV Assessment and Management Plan September 2020 Page 1
    HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN for and on behalf of The Trust Company (PTAL) Limited in its capacity as trustee of the Tasmanian Forest Investment Sub Trust (TFIST) and The Trust Company (Australia) Limited in its capacity as trustee of the Tasmanian Forest Operating Sub Trust (TFOST) and Forico Pty Limited as Forest Manager (Forico) September 2020 Queries, comments and feedback are welcomed. Please contact [email protected] or send comments to: Forico Pty Limited PO Box 5316 LAUNCESTON TAS 7250 Cover Photo: Micklethwaite Marsh Grassland, Surrey Hills CONTENTS Purpose of this document ..................................................................................................... 1 1. CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of the Forest Management Unit (FMU)..................................................... 1 1.2 Biodiversity in Tasmania .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Land use history in Tasmania .................................................................................. 3 1.4 Legislative context and requirements ...................................................................... 3 1.5 Precautionary Principle............................................................................................ 6 2. ASSESSMENT OF HIGH CONSERVATION VALUES ................................................... 7 2.1 High Conservation Value Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Department of Environmental Biology Diversity of butterflies and day-flying moths in urban habitat fragments, south-western Australia Matthew R. Williams This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University of Technology February 2009 Table of Contents Statement of originality ......................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 6 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 1 – General Introduction ......................................................................... 9 1.1 Habitat fragmentation ..................................................................................... 9 1.1.1 Ecological impacts of fragmentation......................................................... 9 1.1.1.1 Habitat reduction ......................................................................... 10 1.1.1.2 Habitat alteration ......................................................................... 10 1.1.1.3 Edge effects ................................................................................ 11 1.1.1.4 Connectivity between fragments and barrier effects ...................... 11 1.1.1.5 Habitat degradation ..................................................................... 11 1.1.1.6 New habitats ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FPA Report 2016-17 Monitoring the Effectiveness of the Biodiversity Provisions of the Tasmanian Forest Practices
    Monitoring the effectiveness of the biodiversity provisions of the Tasmanian Forest Practices Code 2016–17 summary report Amelia Koch and Sarah Munks Report to the Board of the Forest Practices Authority and the Secretary of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Hobart August 2017 FPA Scientific Report 21 FPA effectiveness monitoring: 2016–17 Disclaimers The information presented is a broad overview of information considered relevant (by the authors) to the aim of this report. Whilst the authors have used best endeavours to ensure accuracy, they do not warrant that the material is free of error. Consequently, the information is provided on the basis that the authors will not be liable for any error or omission. However, should any error or omission be notified, the authors will use their best endeavours to correct the information. Front page photograph: FPA ecologist, Jason Wiersma (left) conducting annual eagle nest checks by fixed wing aircraft, with pilot Jesse Hawtree (right). Acknowledgements Many thanks to the large number of people that have contributed to the project summaries covered in this report. The main collaborators are acknowledged in the relevant sections. The full project reports should be referred to for greater detail, ethics approvals, scientific permits and for information on the funders who have supported the projects. We have only supplied information on funders here if no other report or publication is available. Special thanks to the people who have allowed us to include the results from their research, undertaken independent of the Forest Practices Authority, which provides information that can be used to assess the effectiveness of the Forest Practices Code provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Science for Saving Species Research Findings Factsheet Project 2.1
    Science for Saving Species Research findings factsheet Project 2.1 Butterflies on the brink: identifying the Australian butterflies most at risk of extinction In brief Background Terrestrial invertebrates and their Invertebrates are declining globally in high (greater than 30%) chance of habitats are increasingly threatened both diversity and abundance, with extinction. We also identified key by human disturbances, particularly potentially serious consequences threatening processes affecting habitat loss and fragmentation, for ecosystem functioning. Many these species (chiefly inappropriate invasive species, inappropriate fire Australian butterflies are imperilled fire regimes, habitat loss and regimes and climate change. or declining but few are listed fragmentation, invasive species and Continuing declines and extinctions for protection by legislation. climate change), and the research in native terrestrial invertebrate We identified the 26 Australian and management actions needed communities are likely to negatively butterflies at most immediate risk to save them. Mapping of the 26 affect ecosystem functioning. This is of extinction within a 20-year time butterflies’ distributions revealed that because invertebrates play a central frame. We found that one butterfly most are now found only in a single role in many ecological processes, is facing a greater than 90% chance state or territory and many occupy including pollination, herbivory, the of extinction in the next 20 years narrow ranges. Increased resourcing consumption of dead plant and (and may already be extinct), and and management intervention is animal matter, and nutrient cycling, four species have a moderate to required to avert future extinctions. as well as providing a good source of food for other animals. There is urgent need to explore the causes of these declines, and the implications for ecosystems and ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]