DOCSLIB.ORG

Icelandic Rune Poem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Icelandic Rune Poem The Icelandic Rune Poem Aibhilin inghean Daibhidh 040186BR Division I: Dramatic Performance/Poetic Recitation Iceland 1500 Setting: Middle Class/education Summary The Icelandic Rune Poem is a mnemonic poem based on the first 16 characters of the Runic Alphabet. It is dated to the 15 th century, with the earliest known manuscript dating to circa 1500. The poem consists of 16 stanza, each including the Rune name followed by 3 kennings (metaphorical phrases) which describe the poem. Some have interpreted the poem as a type of riddle, however, this metaphorical language was representative of Skaldic poetry (a type of poetry developed in Iceland which followed strict rules and used dense metaphorical language). The Icelandic Rune Poem is written in Old Icelandic, however, it is important to note that at this time period, there was little to no distinction between Old Norse and Old Icelandic. Icelandic evolved out of Old Norse around this time period, but the changes in the language have been so minor that modern day Icelandic speakers can still read Old Norse with only moderate difficulty. The poem will be performed not as a poet performs a poem, due to the limited information on poets and poetry during this time period, but instead as a scholar reading through manuscripts might read aloud a poem he found for another scholar to share an interesting find. Table of Contents Summary....................................................................................................................................................2 Icelandic Poetry..........................................................................................................................................4 Eddic Poetry..........................................................................................................................................4 Skaldic Poetry........................................................................................................................................4 Rímur.....................................................................................................................................................4 Icelandic Rune Poem.............................................................................................................................5 The Runic Alphabet...............................................................................................................................5 The Manuscript......................................................................................................................................5 Icelandic Rune Poem and Translation...................................................................................................6 Old Icelandic..............................................................................................................................................8 Early 16th century Scandinavian Attire.....................................................................................................9 Performance Style....................................................................................................................................10 Difficulties, Compromises, and Commentary..........................................................................................10 Icelandic Poetry There are three major types of Icelandic poetry. Eddic poetry, Skaldic poetry, and Rímur. Eddic poetry is simpler in both style and language. Skaldic poetry, on the other hand is highly stylized with strict rules, complicated meters, and highly metaphorical language. Finally, Rímur is a style of rhyming poetry that developed out of Eddic and Skaldic poetry. Eddic Poetry Eddic poetry is an older form of poetry used from early in the Norse area and likely came to Iceland when the original Norse settlers did. Poetry by Eddic authors is often anonymous and contains exciting tales of Norse gods and ancient heroes. The meter is simple and the language used more straightforward. While Eddic poetry was less metaphorical and more literal, it did rely heavily on alliteration rather than an end rhyme popular in other cultures. Skaldic Poetry Skaldic poetry, like Eddic poetry, relied heavily on alliteration. However, unlike Eddic poetry, Skaldic poetry was exemplified by complicated metaphorical passages known as kennings. Kennings consist of phrases composed of two nouns that represent another noun, or another concept. For example, instead of saying “rain”, a Skaldic poety may say “tears of the gods” and instead of saying “grass” a poet may say “hair of the earth”. Kennings may also have deeper levels, and instead of being descriptive of a noun, they may describe a different idea of phrase. For example, the kennings “'enemy of gold' refers to a man who does not like gold and gives it away: a generous man” (Hurstwic). Beyond the use of methaphorical Kennings, Skaldic poetry also had strict meter requirements and rules governing use of alliteration. In a set of lines, there must be alliteration between elements, a certain stress pattern forming the meter, and internal rhyme elements. An example used by Hurstwic is below: H ramm tang ar lætr h ang a The stressed syllables are underlined ; the alliteration is h ryn virgil mér b ryn ju boldfaced ; and the internal rhyme is italicized . (From Egils saga Skallagrímsson on Hurstwick) This example shows a couplet following several rules such as: there must be 6 syllables per line, 3 stressed and with the final syllable unstressed; there must be two alliterative elements on the first line; there must be internal rhyme in each line (Hurstwick). The stress pattern is followed as the two lines follow the pattern Stress, Unstressed, Unstressed, Stress, Stress, Unstress (3 stresses, final syllable unstressed). The “h” sound is alliterated twice in the first line and ones in the second. There is internal rhyme between the first word of each line with the last word of each line. Rímur Rímur developed in the 14 th century out of Skaldic and Eddic poetry. Unlike Skaldic and Eddic poetry, which did not follow an external rhyme scheme (Skaldic had only internal rhyme), Rímur used rhyme. Most Rímur were epic poems, often based on stories that were already written. This style grew in popularity through the end of period, whereas Skaldic and Eddic poetry became less popular after the 14 th Century. Iceland until this time had been relatively isolated, and in the 14 th century, it was marginally under the rul of Norway. Later in the 14th century, Norway, and with it Iceland, came under the rule of the Danish crown, and was heavily influenced by the works of other countries (Central Bank of Iceland). Icelandic Rune Poem The Icelandic Rune Poem, written in Old Icelandic, is one of 3 poems written as a mnemonic device for remembering the Runic Alphabet, also known as the Futhark (after the first 6 letters). It is similar to more modern alphabet rhymes, such as “Tom Thumb's Alphabet” which begins “A was an archer, who shot at a frog. B was a butcher, and had a great dog.” The other two Rune poems are in Old Norse (The Norwegian Rune poem), which is the earliest recorded Rune Poem and the shortest and most simple, and in Old English (The Anglo-Saxon Rune Poem), which is the longest Rune Poem. It is possible that these Rune poems shared a common 'ancestor' and were further developed in these different cultures languages prior to being written down (Dickins). However, each Rune poem was first recorded in different years and has distinctly different elements, despite many similarities. The Icelandic Rune Poem was written in the 15 th century. It was first recorded in a manuscript dating circa 1500. The poem addresses the first 16 characters in the Runic alphabet, in order, though other letterss existed by this time period. Thus there are 16 stanza. Each stanza follows the same format and consists of three kennings. The lines are connected via alliteration of the first and second kenning, while the third kenning has internal alliteration. Each of the kennings offers ideas and elements that describe the stanza's rune. Some have referred to this style almost as a riddle from which the rune name can be derived (Page). For example, the first rune name “fe” means 'wealth'. This rune is then described as “discord among kinsmen” and “fire of the sea” (Svenson). The connections are more abstract than they are literal, befitting the Icelandic poetic style. Some stanzas contain slightly more literal descriptions, but even those have the underlying metaphorical complexities, such as the second stanza rune name “Ur” (shower) described as “lamentation of the clouds” (Svenson). The Runic Alphabet The Runic Alphabet, also known as the Futhark, is an early writing system dating from as early as the 1st century, with a majority of examples from around the 11 th century. Many runic inscriptions are short statements carved into stone or wood. Typical early examples of the Runic Alphabet include short written statements such as 'Hrothgar was here” or “Belongs to Hrothgar”, grave inscriptions and religions inscriptions. The Norwegian Futhark is provided below (Omniglot). The Manuscript There are four manuscripts dated from the 17 th century and earlier than contain this manuscript. The earliest version is from AM 687d, 4to, dated to the 15 th century which contained the Rune Poem without the names of the Runes explicitly stated (see the manuscript in Appendix B). This manuscript offers some difficulties in transcription, as the final stanza of the poem (the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 9. Freyr's Solar Power and the Purifying Sword
    The Waning Sword E Conversion Imagery and Celestial Myth in Beowulf DWARD The Waning Sword Conversion Imagery and EDWARD PETTIT P The image of a giant sword mel� ng stands at the structural and thema� c heart of the Old ETTIT Celestial Myth in Beowulf English heroic poem Beowulf. This me� culously researched book inves� gates the nature and signifi cance of this golden-hilted weapon and its likely rela� ves within Beowulf and beyond, drawing on the fi elds of Old English and Old Norse language and literature, liturgy, archaeology, astronomy, folklore and compara� ve mythology. In Part I, Pe� t explores the complex of connota� ons surrounding this image (from icicles to candles and crosses) by examining a range of medieval sources, and argues that the giant sword may func� on as a visual mo� f in which pre-Chris� an Germanic concepts and prominent Chris� an symbols coalesce. In Part II, Pe� t inves� gates the broader Germanic background to this image, especially in rela� on to the god Ing/Yngvi-Freyr, and explores the capacity of myths to recur and endure across � me. Drawing on an eclec� c range of narra� ve and linguis� c evidence from Northern European texts, and on archaeological discoveries, Pe� t suggests that the T image of the giant sword, and the characters and events associated with it, may refl ect HE an elemental struggle between the sun and the moon, ar� culated through an underlying W myth about the the� and repossession of sunlight. ANING The Waning Sword: Conversion Imagery and Celesti al Myth in Beowulf is a welcome contribu� on to the overlapping fi elds of Beowulf-scholarship, Old Norse-Icelandic literature and Germanic philology.
    [Show full text]
  • Old English Literature: a Brief Summary
    Volume II, Issue II, June 2014 - ISSN 2321-7065 Old English Literature: A Brief Summary Nasib Kumari Student J.k. Memorial College of Education Barsana Mor Birhi Kalan Charkhi Dadri Introduction Old English literature (sometimes referred to as Anglo-Saxon literature) encompasses literature written in Old English (also called Anglo-Saxon) in Anglo-Saxon England from the 7th century to the decades after the Norman Conquest of 1066. "Cædmon's Hymn", composed in the 7th century according to Bede, is often considered the oldest extant poem in English, whereas the later poem, The Grave is one of the final poems written in Old English, and presents a transitional text between Old and Middle English.[1] Likewise, the Peterborough Chronicle continues until the 12th century. The poem Beowulf, which often begins the traditional canon of English literature, is the most famous work of Old English literature. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle has also proven significant for historical study, preserving a chronology of early English history.Alexander Souter names the commentary on Paul's epistles by Pelagius "the earliest extant work by a British author".[2][3] In descending order of quantity, Old English literature consists of: sermons and saints' lives, biblical translations; translated Latin works of the early Church Fathers; Anglo-Saxon chronicles and narrative history works; laws, wills and other legal works; practical works ongrammar, medicine, geography; and poetry.[4] In all there are over 400 survivingmanuscripts from the period, of which about 189 are considered "major".[5] Besides Old English literature, Anglo-Saxons wrote a number of Anglo-Latin works.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of contents Acknowledgements V List of Abbreviations IX 0 Introduction 1 0.1 Anglo-Saxons and writing: a brief introduction 1 0.2 Runic writing before the fifth century 4 0.3 The runic and roman writing systems 6 0.4 English runes before and after the conversion 8 0.5 Methodology 11 1 Runes in Old English Manuscripts: The Exeter Book Manuscript as a Case Study 17 1.1 Runes in the Exeter Book 17 1.1.1 Marginal runes 23 1.1.2 Runic abbreviations 27 1.1.3 Textual runes 30 1.2 Runes, riddles, and revelation 35 1.3 Conclusion 43 2 Reading and Writing in the Runic Riddles and The Husband’s Message 45 2.1 Runes in the Exeter Book riddles 45 2.1.1 Speech and the material word: Riddle 24 47 2.1.2 Talking about writing in Riddles 42 and 58 52 2.1.3 Hidden in plain sight: re-reading Riddles 19 and 64 57 2.2 The Husband’s Message 65 2.2.1 The identity of the speaker 69 2.2.2 Interpreting the runes of The Husband’s Message 78 2.3 Conclusion 82 3 Cynewulf’s Signatures and the Materiality of the Letter 85 3.1 Cynewulf’s epilogues 85 3.1.1 Cynewulf’s runic signatures 90 3.1.2 Problem runes and playful language 95 3.2 Names in manuscripts: scribal colophons and authorial signatures 100 3.3 Names in epigraphy 106 3.4 Writing the cross: visual signifiers in Elene 112 VIII Table of contents 3.5 The purpose of Cynewulf’s epilogues 117 3.6 Conclusion 120 4 The Power of the Letter in Runic Charms and Solomon and Saturn I 121 4.1 Anglo-Saxon charms and the story of Imma 122 4.1.1 Letters and divine power 126 4.1.2 Runes in Old English charms 130 4.1.3 Imma
    [Show full text]
  • Words for Wood: the Lexis of Trees in Old English Poetry
    WORDS FOR WOOD: THE LEXIS OF TREES IN OLD ENGLISH POETRY by MARY ELIZABETH WARD A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham May 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Contents Introduction: p.1 Methodolgy p.2 The Context of the Old English Poetic Corpus p.3 The Context of Life in Anglo-Saxon England p.7 The Critical Context p.10 Structure of this thesis p.10 Chapter One: Words for Wood: p.12 Collective terms p.13 Individual terms p.17 Development and usage p.22 Formula p.27 Chapter Two: Case Study of ‘æsc’: p.29 The Ash Tree p.29 The Ash Wood p.32 The Artefact p.34 The People p.35 The place and the action p.37 The Attributes p.38 Chapter Three: Case Study of ‘wudu’: p.46 Compounds p.47 Wood in the landscape p.50 Wood as material p.57 Wood and wordplay p.60 Conclusion p.64 Appendix p.70 Bibliography p.79 Introduction This thesis had its origins in an attempt to discover and consider the role and significance of the tree in the Old English poetic corpus.
    [Show full text]
  • Elder Futhark Rune Poem and Some Notes RYKHART: ODINSXRAL
    Elder Futhark Rune Poem and some notes RYKHART: ODINSXRAL Dedication Mysteries ancient, Allfather found Wrested from anguish, nine days fast bound Hung from the world tree, pierced by the spear Odin who seized them, make these staves clear 1 Unless otherwise specified, all text and artwork within ELDER FUTHARK RUNE POEM and some notes RYKHART: ODINSXRAL are copyright by the author and is not to be copied or reproduced in any medium or form without the express written permission of the author Reikhart Odinsthrall both Reikhart Odinsthrall and RYKHART: ODINSXRAL are also both copyright Dec 31, 2013 Elder Futhark Rune Poem by Reikhart Odinsthrall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://odinsthrall.co.uk/rune-poem.html. 2 F: Fehu : Cattle / Wealth Wealth is won and gold bestowed But honour's due to all men owed Gift the given and ware the lord For thy name's worth noised abroad U: Uruz : Aurochs / Wild-ox Wild ox-blood proud, sharp hornéd might On moorland harsh midst sprite and wight Unconquered will and fierce in form Through summer's sun and winter's storm X: Thurisaz : Thorn / Giant / Thor Thorn hedge bound the foe repelled A giant's anger by Mjolnir felled Thor protect us, fight for troth In anger true as Odin's wrath A: Ansuz : As / God / Odin In mead divine and written word In raven's call and whisper heard Wisdom seek and wise-way act In Mimir's well see Odin's pact R: Raidho : Journey / Carriage By horse and wheel to travel far Till journey's
    [Show full text]
  • Manusanvisningar För Scripta Islandica
    The alysendlecan rune: Runic abbreviations in their immediate literary context. Thomas Birkett Runic abbreviations in manuscripts constitute something of a curiosity in runic studies, representing what one might call the practical afterlife of the script, transferred from the epigraphical world to the scriptorium. This practice makes use of the logographic component of the script, whereby each character bears a meaningful name, whose initial sound typically corresponds with the phonetic value of the rune. Although the earliest witness to such a naming system is the Abecedarium Nordmannicum, usually dated to the mid ninth century (Bischoff 1950: 45; Derolez 1954: 82-3), there is little doubt that this is an early tradition, supported both by cognate names in North Germanic sources (Halsall 1981: 3) and by the suggestion that certain Elder Fuþark inscriptions make use of ideograms, including the proposed deployment of the *oþala rune on the Pietroassa neck-ring to represent the concept of possession (Düwel 2001: 28). Whilst such Begriffsrunen are rather rare, and there are few ‘convincing’ examples in Old English inscriptions (Page 1999: 79), the manuscript practice exploits an original feature of the script, and is not simply an antiquarian invention. Only a small number of runic characters are used as abbreviations. The maðr rune is found regularly in Icelandic manuscripts, the fé rune somewhat less frequently, whilst in Anglo- Saxon manuscripts the runes mon, dæg, wynn and eþel are all used on occasion. These are some of the most functional of the rune names, occurring relatively often in written language, unlike the elusive peorð, for example, which would be of little or no use as an abbreviation because of its rarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Community in Old English Poetry
    FORESTS OF THOUGHT AND FIELDS OF PERCEPTION: LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY IN OLD ENGLISH POETRY by MARY ELIZABETH WARD A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham September 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract. Old English poetry is centred on the concept of community and the importance of belonging. Landscape was a component of any community since, during the period when Old English poetry was being composed and written down, the landscape was a far more important constituent of daily life than it is for the majority of people today. Landscape dictated the places that could be settled, as well as the placing of the paths, fords, and bridges that joined them; it controlled boundaries, occupations, and trading routes. In the poetry of the period landscape, as part of the fabric of community, is the arbiter of whether each element of a community is in its proper place and relationship to the others. It is the means of explaining how a community is constructed, policed, and empowered.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: All That Is Wrought Is Not Gold : Locating Wealth in Old English Gnomic Texts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Title: All that is wrought is not gold : locating Wealth in Old English Gnomic Texts Author: Rafał Borysławski Citation style: Borysławski Rafał. (2015). All that is wrought is not gold : locating Wealth in Old English Gnomic Texts. W: R. Borysławski, A. Czarnowus, Ł. Neubauer (red.), "Marvels of reading : essays in honour of professor Andrzej Wicher" (S. 55-70). Katowice : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Rafał Borysławski University of Silesia All That Is Wrought Is Not Gold: Locating Wealth in Old English Gnomic Texts That references to wealth are present all over Old English poetry is beyond doubt; likewise beyond doubt is the fact that representations of wealth at- tained a form of cult status in our contemporary renditions of Old English culture: we see Beowulf wanting to feast his eyes on the treasure before he dies, our imagination is captivated by the serendipitous finding of the Staffordshire hoard and we are transfixed by the Beowulfian, Tolkienian, and Peter Jackson’s dragon guarding the gold-hoard. The present essay shall be an attempt at outlining several of the cultural contexts in which wealth and ideas related to it operated within Old English wisdom poetry. My intention here is not to follow the references to Old English wealth in general, but, having proposed the boundaries within which it appears to be located, I shall refer to several examples confirming these boundaries in the context of Old English gnomic verse, accompanied by references to the allegorical applications of wealth presented by the book outlining and fashioning the later existential outlooks of Old English poetry, that is Gregory the Great’s Moralia in Iob “Morals in the Book of Job.” In a sense, one does not need to look very far to locate wealth in Old English poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Rune Poem' in the Encyclopedia of British Medieval Literature Author(S) Birkett, Thomas Editor(S) Echard, Siân Rouse, Robert
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cork Open Research Archive Title 'Rune Poem' in The Encyclopedia of British Medieval Literature Author(s) Birkett, Thomas Editor(s) Echard, Siân Rouse, Robert Publication date 2017-08 Original citation Birkett, T. (2017) 'Rune Poem', in Echard, S. and Rouse, R. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of British Medieval Literature, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. isbn: 978-1-118-39698-8 Type of publication Book chapter Link to publisher's http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118396957 version Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/5089 from Downloaded on 2018-08-23T18:56:08Z Rune Poem poet deviates from the typical order of the futhorc in several places, including placing TOM BIRKETT the rune ear (“earth” or “grave”) at the end University College Cork, Ireland of the sequence, seemingly to conclude the poem on a meditative note. Whilst it has been A rune poem is a verse exposition of the com- suggested that the rune poem tradition as a monnamesgiventotheindividualcharacters whole developed “as an elementary guide to of the runic alphabet, and examples of vary- the futhorc,presumablydesignedtohelpthe ing complexity survive from Anglo-Saxon memory” (Page 1999, 63), in the case of the England, thirteenth-century Norway, and late Old English poem the individual stanzas are medieval Iceland. far too developed to serve a purely mnemonic The original tenth-century witness to the function (Shippey 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • The Lacnunga and Its Sources: the Nine Herbs Charm and Wiš Fęrstice
    THE LACNUNGA AND ITS SOURCES: THE NINE HERBS CHARM AND WIÐ FÆRSTICE RECONSIDERED Karin Olsen Rijksuniversiteit Groningen ABSTRACT Gods play a very minor role in Old English literature. No mythological tales have survived, and even short accounts of or mere allusions to pagan (major and minor) divinities are extremely rare. All that is left from the Anglo-Saxon period are two references to Woden in Maxims I and the Nine Herbs Charm, one mysterious occurrence of Ing in The Rune Poem, and an equally obscure description of shooting esa (Æsir), elves and hægtessan in the charm Wið Færstice. Given the sparsity of such references, we are well advised not to interpret them too quickly as cryptic manifestations of heathen myths. On the contrary, an examina- tion of the two short ‘myths’ in the Nine Herbs Charm and Wið Færstice shows that both myths were created in their present form in the Christian era for the express purpose of transforming their supernatural protagonists into demonic, disease-inflicting beings that needed to be fought and destroyed . KEY WORDS: Elves, hægtæssan, witches, Æsir, valkyries, dísir, Woden, Furious Host, Baldr, elfshot Hexenschuss, smith(s). 23 RESUMEN Los dioses juegan un papel menor en la literatura del inglés antiguo. Ningún cuento mito- lógico ha sobrevivido, e incluso relatos cortos o simples alusiones a divinidades paganas THE NINE... (mayores y menores) son extremadamente escasas. Todo lo que queda en la literatura anglo- sajona son dos referencias a Odín en Maxims I y el Nine Herbs Charm, una misteriosa mención de Ing en The Rune Poem, y una descripción igualmente oscura del disparo de esa (Æsir), elfos y hægtessan en el encantamiento Wið Færstice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Runic Script and Its Characters in Old English and Middle English Texts
    The Runic Script and its Characters in Old English and Middle English Texts Petrinec, Monika Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2013 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences / Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Filozofski fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:646193 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-27 Repository / Repozitorij: FFOS-repository - Repository of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek Sveučilište J. J. Strossmayera u Osijeku Filozofski fakultet Diplomski studij Engleskog i njemačkog jezika i književnosti Monika Petrinec The Runic Script and its Characters in Old English and Middle English Texts Mentor: Doc. Dr. sc. Tanja Gradeček Erdeljić Osijek, 2013 1 Summary The aim of this work is, primarily, to introduce and describe the topic of the runes as found in the development of the English language. A true value of the runes lies actually in some of the preserved texts which were vastly created during the Old and Middle English period. According to historical evidence, the runes were used by various people since prehistoric times, but the traces were probably lost. The early inscriptions chiselled into the stone or wood were the results of extraordinary master work. Marvellous ornaments, animal images and prolific decorations, were just a few of significant characteristics, which made rune stones look tremendous and unique. One needed to be very skilful and of capable hand in order to make tiny and precise movements in order to carve a message, a magical charm, spell, or just a mere text, that served for individual purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • King Solomon's Magic
    Oral Tradition, 5/1 (1990): 20-36 King Solomon’s Magic: The Power of a Written Text Marie Nelson The written text on which I propose to focus in this paper—a Pater Noster inscribed in Germanic runes and Roman letters—is actually a text within a text. The larger text, an Old English dialogue to which editors have given the name “Solomon and Saturn I,”1 I will argue, provides a context for the performance of a charm. It presents the Biblical King Solomon as a master magician who draws his power from the written words, indeed, from the written letters, of the Pater Noster. I will be giving attention, then, to a fi ctional representation of an oral performance. It is not my intention to claim either that “Solomon and Saturn I” was orally composed, that is, created by a performer as he performed it before an audience; or that it was composed in writing, that is, with the opportunity to work slowly and go back to correct “mistakes” that writing affords, though I will have something to say about the greater likelihood of written composition. What I propose to do is discuss the way the poem develops what Alain Renoir might call “an empirical context within the text proper” (1988:18), in this case an extended exchange between two speakers that constitutes a setting for the performance of a charm by one of those two speakers. In doing so, I will refer to features of other Old English poems that are clearly identifi able as charms—the “Journey Charm” and “Nine Herbs Charm,” for example—and to Thomas A.
    [Show full text]