DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating the Impact of Alcohol Minimum Unit Pricing in Scotland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating the Impact of Alcohol Minimum Unit Pricing in Scotland Evaluating the impact of alcohol minimum unit pricing in Scotland: Observational study of small retailers A study conducted on behalf of NHS Health Scotland (now Public Health Scotland) as part of the wider Monitoring and Evaluating Scotland’s Alcohol Strategy (MESAS) evaluation of minimum unit pricing. Martine Stead Nathan Critchlow Douglas Eadie Niamh Fitzgerald Kathryn Angus Richard Purves Jennifer McKell Anne Marie MacKintosh Heather Mitchell Colin Sumpter, University of Stirling Colin Angus, University of Sheffield Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... 6 Declaration of interests ............................................................................................... 6 List of acronyms and key terms .................................................................................. 8 Executive summary .................................................................................................. 10 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 10 The aim of this study .......................................................................................... 10 What we did ....................................................................................................... 11 Summary of the three work packages................................................................ 12 What we found ................................................................................................... 13 Other findings .................................................................................................... 20 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 21 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 24 1.1 About this study ........................................................................................... 24 1.2 Aim and research questions ........................................................................ 24 2. Methodology ......................................................................................................... 25 2.1 Overall study design .................................................................................... 25 2.2 What is meant by small retailers? ................................................................ 27 2.3 When were data collected? .......................................................................... 27 2.4 Overview of each work package .................................................................. 27 2.4.1 Work package one: Electronic Point of Sale data (EPoS) ............................... 27 2.4.2 Work package two: Retailer audit .................................................................... 28 2.4.3 Work package three: Analysis of the retail trade press ................................... 29 2.4.4 The five ‘case study’ products ......................................................................... 29 2.5 Ethical approval ........................................................................................... 30 3. Electronic point of sale data ................................................................................. 31 3.1 Methods ....................................................................................................... 31 3.1.1 Design ............................................................................................................. 31 3.1.2 Design and observation periods ...................................................................... 31 3.1.3 Retailer sample ............................................................................................... 32 3.1.4 Product (Unique Product Code) sample .......................................................... 36 3.1.5 Approach to multipack UPCs sold as single containers .................................. 38 3.1.6 Fifty product groups and five case studies examined in detail ........................ 45 3.1.7 Measures ........................................................................................................ 47 3.1.8 Analysis ........................................................................................................... 51 3.2 Average number of UPCs sold, at least once, by each retailer .................... 52 3.3 Proportion of multipacks sold as separate containers .................................. 58 1 3.4 Proportion of retailers selling multipack UPCs as separate containers ........ 62 3.5 Trends in average container size (ml) .......................................................... 67 3.6 Trends in average product strength (ABV) ................................................... 72 3.7 Trends in number of alcohol units in aggregate product .............................. 79 3.8 Trends in nominal average sales price-per-unit ........................................... 85 3.9 Year-on-year changes in the price-per-unit distribution ............................... 91 3.10 Pricing in line with Minimum Unit Pricing ................................................... 93 3.11 Changes in the price differential among 50 tracked products .................... 96 3.12 Summary ................................................................................................. 102 3.12.1 Trends in the product range offered to consumers ...................................... 102 3.12.2 Product characteristics ................................................................................ 103 3.12.3 Pricing ......................................................................................................... 104 4. Retailer audit ...................................................................................................... 107 4.1 Methods ..................................................................................................... 107 4.1.1 Overall design ............................................................................................... 107 4.1.2 Sample of stores and recruitment.................................................................. 107 4.1.3 Data collection ............................................................................................... 109 4.1.4 Data analysis ................................................................................................. 111 4.2 Retailer characteristics ............................................................................... 112 4.3 Retailers’ understanding of and attitudes towards MUP ............................ 118 4.3.1 Understanding of MUP .................................................................................. 118 4.3.2 Attitudes towards MUP .................................................................................. 120 4.4 Implementation and compliance ................................................................ 122 4.4.1 Implementation .............................................................................................. 122 4.4.2 Information and support ................................................................................ 126 4.4.3 Compliance ................................................................................................... 129 4.5 Retailers’ perceptions of the impact of MUP on sales and profits .............. 132 4.5.1 Retailers’ perceptions of the impact of MUP on alcohol sales ....................... 132 4.5.2 Retailers’ perceptions of the impact of MUP on profits from alcohol sales .... 135 4.5.3 Retailers’ perceptions of ability to compete with supermarkets after MUP implementation ....................................................................................................... 137 4.6 Retailers’ alcohol product range before and after MUP implementation .... 138 4.6.1 Overview ................................................................................................. 139 4.6.2 Beers ............................................................................................................. 142 4.6.3 Ciders ............................................................................................................ 145 4.6.4 Fortified wines ............................................................................................... 150 4.6.5 Perries ........................................................................................................... 151 4.6.6 RTDs ............................................................................................................. 152 2 4.6.7 Spirits ............................................................................................................ 157 4.6.8 Wines ............................................................................................................ 159 4.7 Alcohol promotional activities before and after MUP implementation ........ 161 4.7.1 Observational audit ....................................................................................... 161 4.7.2 Retailer interviews ......................................................................................... 165 4.8 Summary ................................................................................................... 170 5. Retail trade press analysis ................................................................................. 173 5.1 Methods ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tavistock Abbey
    TAVISTOCK ABBEY Tavistock Abbey, also known as the Abbey of Saint Mary and Saint Rumon was originally constructed of timber in 974AD but 16 years later the Vikings looted the abbey then burned it to the ground, the later abbey which is depicted here, was then re-built in stone. On the left is a 19th century engraving of the Court Gate as seen at the top of the sketch above and which of course can still be seen today near Tavistock’s museum. In those early days Tavistock would have been just a small hamlet so the abbey situated beside the River Tavy is sure to have dominated the landscape with a few scattered farmsteads and open grassland all around, West Down, Whitchurch Down and even Roborough Down would have had no roads, railways or canals dividing the land, just rough packhorse routes. There would however have been rivers meandering through the countryside of West Devon such as the Tavy and the Walkham but the land belonging to Tavistock’s abbots stretched as far as the River Tamar; packhorse routes would then have carried the black-robed monks across the border into Cornwall. So for centuries, religious life went on in the abbey until the 16th century when Henry VIII decided he wanted a divorce which was against the teachings of the Catholic Church. We all know what happened next of course, the Dissolution of the Monasteries, when along with all the other abbeys throughout the land, Tavistock Abbey was raised to the ground. Just a few ruined bits still remain into the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking in the UK
    Drinking in the UK An exploration of trends Lesley Smith and David Foxcroft May 2009 Reviews research and highlights trends in alcohol consumption over the last 20 to 30 years. A key part of the Government’s alcohol harm reduction strategy is to monitor changes in drinking habits over time and to identify what factors are potentially contributing to the rising levels of consumption. This study is a systematic review of research relevant to trends in alcohol consumption over the last 20 to 30 years in the UK. The review: • assesses the number, types and quality of existing research studies; • synthesises the findings to evaluate alcohol drinking trends in the UK, highlighting key changes; • discusses possible explanations for the trends observed, assessing what factors may have contributed to changes; • explores implications for policy; • makes recommendations for future research. www.jrf.org.uk Contents Executive summary 5 1 Background 9 2 Aims 11 3 Methods 12 4 Results 15 5 Discussion of selected trends 83 List of abbreviations 92 References 93 Appendix 1: Search terms used in electronic database searches 97 Appendix 2: The review selection process 100 Appendix 3: Reasons for exclusion of articles and surveys 101 Appendix 4: Survey details 103 Appendix 5: Precision of percentage estimates 110 Acknowledgements 112 About the authors 112 Executive summary Scope Methods This report describes the methods and findings A broad range of studies were considered for the of a systematic review of research relevant to review. trends in alcohol consumption over the last 20 to For the assessment of trends in drinking we 30 years in the UK, and a brief assessment of the conducted a systematic review of the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Offences Involving Buckfast Tonic Wine
    FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST Request Number: F-2010-01013 Keyword: Crime Subject: Offences Involving Buckfast Tonic Wine Request and Answer: This is to inform you that the Police Service of Northern Ireland has now completed its search for the information you requested. The decision has been taken to disclose the located information to you in full. Question 1 A Freedom of Information request showed that Buckfast was mentioned in 5,638 crime reports in Strathclyde Police reports from 2006-2009, equating to three a day on average. One in 10 of those offences were violent and the bottle was used as a weapon 114 times in that period. Under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act, for the period of 2006 to present, please explain how many times Buckfast tonic wine, is mentioned in PSNI crime reports, Answer Since 2006 there have been 102 incidents involving Buckfast Tonic wine. The statistics provided relate to validated crimes where Buckfast was mentioned in the initial report to police and where the bottle was used as a weapon. There may have been other instances where a Buckfast bottle was used and this would have been revealed later as part of the investigation and therefore would not be included. Occurrences involving Buckfast classified as "street drinking" or "rowdy/nuisance persons" were not examined as they are not crimes. Question 2 How many of the offences were of a violent nature. Answer Of the 102 incidents, 8 of these offences could be deemed as violent crime. Violent crime comprises three main offence groupings: offences against the person, sexual offences and robbery.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARISON of INTERNATIONAL ALCOHOL DRINKING GUIDELINES 2019 Comparison of International Alcohol Drinking Guidelines 1
    OIV COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL ALCOHOL DRINKING GUIDELINES 2019 Comparison of International Alcohol Drinking Guidelines 1 WARNING This document has not been submitted to the step procedure for examining resolutions and cannot in any way be treated as an OIV resolution. Only resolutions adopted by the Member States of the OIV have an official character. This document has been drafted in the framework of OIV Expert Group Consumption, Nutrition & Health and revised by other OIV Commissions. This document, drafted and developed on the initiative of the OIV, is a collective expert report. © OIV publications, 1st Edition: March 2019 ISBN 978-2-85038-009-9 OIV - International Organisation of Vine and Wine 18, rue d’Aguesseau F-75008 Paris – France www.oiv.int OIV Collective Expertise Document Comparison of International Alcohol Drinking Guidelines 2 SCOPE The group of experts « consumption, nutrition and health » of the OIV has worked extensively on the drinking guidelines set by different countries and also has underlined the importance to harmonize the definition of standard drinks since what constitutes a standard drink differ largely among the different countries in the world. This document does not reflect the position of the member states of the OIV and does not constitute a position of the OIV. The purpose of this document is to provide comparisons of national guidelines on the consumption of alcoholic beverages. This document aims to gather more specific information either on recommendations on drinking levels considered ‘minimum risk’ for men and women existing in many countries globally or on the level of non-harmful alcohol consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinks Menu Gradwell Street
    ISSUE 28 BIG PAT AND THE LADS ARE BACK FOR A NEW THRILLING ADVENTURE IN COCKTAILS SUMMER 2019 DRINKS MENU GRADWELL STREET PATTERSONSLIVERPOOL.COM @PATTERSONSARENTWE P4 773 R50N5 LV P001 Club Tropicana AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 KOKO KANU COCONUT RUM, PASSIONFRUIT, PINEAPPLE, LIME, PASSIONFRUIT SYRUP More Than A Feeling AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 ABSOLUT VODKA, BRIOTETTE RHUBARB LIQUEUR, MANZANA VERDE APPLE LIQUEUR, APPLE, CRANBERRY Parma State Of Mind ABSOLUT VODKA, BRIOTETTE VIOLETTE, GOMME, LEMON, BLACK GRAPE SODA Juicy AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 DISARONNO AMARETTO, GIFFARD CHERRY LIQUEUR, VANILLA, CRANBERRY Me and Mr Black HAVANA ESPECIAL RUM, EXPRÈ COFFEE LIQUEUR, ESPRESSO, SUGAR Stage Fright AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 APPLETON SIGNATURE BLEND RUM, LIME, KOKO KANU, BANANA PURÉE, PINEAPPLE, GOMME. Smooth Operator AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 BEEFEATER GIN, GIFFARD WATERMELON, HIBISCUS GOMME, LIME, TONIC. Daddy Kool EVAN WILLIAMS BOURBON, MANGO, LIME, SUGAR, GINGER BEER Notorious F.I.G BEEFEATER GIN, BRIOTETTE RHUBARB, FIG LIQUEUR, CREAM SODA Can You Handle It? BEEFEATER GIN, BUCKFAST TONIC WINE, CAMPARI, ORANGE BITTERS. La La Land PAMPELLE,PROSECCO, CANDYFLOSS Fashion Killer WILD TURKEY STRAIGHT BOURBON, MAPLE SYRUP, ORANGE BITTERS Dark Necessities JAMESONS, BLACK FIRE, ESPRESSO, CINNAMON SYRUP El Mariachi AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 EL JIMADOR BLANCO TEQUILA, KIWI PUREE, GIFFARD WATERMELON LIQUEUR, LIME, SUGAR ALL COCKTAILS £7.5 0 COCKTAILS BAS!C B!TCH3SI Strawberry Daiquiri HAVANA 3YR RUM, GIFFARD FRAISE LIQUEUR, STRAWBERRY PUREE, LIME French Martini ABSOLUT VANILLA, GIFFARD CASSIS LIQUEUR, PINEAPPLE, RASPBERRIES Bellini CHOICE OF PASSIONFRUIT, STRAWBERRY OR BANANA, PROSECCO Mai Tai AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 HAVANA 3 YR, HAVANA ESPECIAL, VELVET FALERNUM, ORGEAT, POMEGRANATE, ORANGE, PINEAPPLE Tommy’s Margarita EL JIMADOR BLANCO TEQUILA, AGAVE, LIME Long Island AVAILABLKE AS PITCHER £15.95 ABSOLUT VODKA, BEEFEATER GIN, HAVANA 3YR RUM, EL JIMADOR BLANCO, LEMON, DIET COKE.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol How Much Is Too Much? Alcohol - How Much Is Too Much? Alcohol Is Something to Be Enjoyed, but Drinking Too Much Or at the Wrong Time Can Be Harmful
    Alcohol How much is too much? Alcohol - how much is too much? Alcohol is something to be enjoyed, but drinking too much or at the wrong time can be harmful. It is important to know where the benefits end and the risks begin. The weekly guideline for low risk drinking is: • 14 units for women • 14 units for men. It is not safe to save up your daily units and drink them in one go. A binge is 6 units or more for women, and 6 units or more for men in one drinking session. After an episode of heavy drinking, it is advisable to avoid drinking for 48 hours to allow your body to recover. One in four men and one in seven women exceed the recommended daily units of alcohol. Many people underestimate how much they actually drink. What is lower risk drinking? Lower risk drinking is drinking in a way that is unlikely to cause harm to yourself or others. The government advises that: • men should not regularly drink more than 2-3 units a day • women should not regularly drink more than 2-3 units a day. What is higher risk drinking? This is drinking at levels that lead to significant harm to physical and mental health and at levels that may be causing substantial harm to others. Women who drink over 35 units a week (or who regularly drink over six units a day) and men who drink over 35 units a week (or who regularly drink over 6 units a day) are at high risk of such harm.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Environmental Impact of Off-License Premises on Residential Neighbourhoods
    An Investigation into the Environmental Impact of Off-license Premises on Residential Neighbourhoods November 2007 Alasdair J. M. Forsyth, Neil Davidson* and Jemma C. Lennox Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research The Glasgow Centre for the Study of Violence Glasgow Caledonian University * Now at the Scottish Institute for Policing Research, School of Social Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN 1 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Donna Hughes for her assistance during observational fieldwork, Leona Cunningham for assistance during piloting, Stephen Lopez and Catherine McGuinity for help with project administration, Andrew McAuley for providing health statistics, Steve Parkin for information on drug-related litter, Pauline Roberts for graphical advice, Alcohol Focus Scotland for their continued support during this research and the anonymous shop workers who participated in this research. 2 Contents Page Introduction Background 4 Aims 10 Methods Research Design and Procedures 11 Selection of Study Area 15 Results Observations of Neighbourhood Convenience Stores 19 Interviews with Shop Servers 28 Survey of Alcohol-related Detritus 39 Spatial Relationships between Shops and Alcohol-related Incivilities 58 Conclusions Discussion 81 Limitations and Future Research 94 Key Implications and Recommendations 99 Bibliography References 103 Appendices Shop Observation Schedule 114 Shop Server Interview Topic Guide 118 Items of Alcohol-related Detritus Recording Form 119 Neighbourhood Profiles 120 Brand Identified Items of Alcohol-related Detritus 121 3 Introduction Background In recent times there has been a great deal of concern about levels of anti-social behaviour across the UK (Home Office, 2005; House of Commons, 2005; Scottish Parliament, 2003). Several reports have investigated the role of alcohol as a potentially important contributor to this problem (Babb, 2007; Engineer et al, 2003; Finney, 2004; Home Office, 2001; Matthews et al, 2006; Richardson & Budd, 2003; Travis, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Price List Wine
    Bristol Group of Companies Price List Wine Germany Item Description Size Per CS EA ex. VAT EA inc. VAT CS inc. VAT Still Wine 13056 DEINHARD PIESPORTER RIESLING 750ML 12 12.05 13.50 145.00 Champagne Item Description Size Per CS EA ex. VAT EA inc. VAT CS inc. VAT Champagne 14301 BEAU JOIE BRUT ROSE SPECIAL CUVEE 750ML 6 107.14 120.00 648.00 750ML Champagne 14300 BEAU JOIE BRUT SPECIAL CUVEE 750ML 750ML 6 84.82 95.00 513.00 Champagne 14302 BEAU JOIE DEMI SEC SUGAR KING 750ML 6 84.82 95.00 513.00 Champagne 13270 BILLECART SALMON BRUT 750ML 6 75.89 85.00 459.00 Champagne 13277 BILLECART SALMON BRUT ROSE 750ML 6 115.13 128.95 624.00 Champagne 13278 BILLECART SALMON DEMI SEC 750ML 6 75.89 85.00 459.00 Champagne 14045 BOLLINGER CUVEE BRUT 375ML 375ML 6 47.32 53.00 285.00 Champagne 14047 BOLLINGER CUVEE BRUT 3L 3L 1 397.32 445.00 445.00 Champagne 12717 BOLLINGER CUVEE BRUT 750ML 750ML 6 91.07 102.00 549.00 Champagne 12889 BOLLINGER 'LA GRANDE ANNEE' 750ML 6 153.53 171.95 328.00 Champagne 14063 BOLLINGER ROSE CHAMP 1.5L 1.5L 3 250.89 281.00 756.00 Champagne 12751 BOLLINGER ROSE CHAMPAGNE 750ML 6 109.78 122.95 663.00 Champagne 13988 LAURENT PERRIER GRAND SIECLE 750ML 6 266.03 297.95 1,608.00 Champagne 13998 LAURENT PERRIER HARMONY DEMI S 750ML 6 71.43 80.00 432.00 Champagne 13906 LAURENT PERRIER LA CUVEE 1.5L 1.5L 6 142.86 160.00 864.00 Champagne 13909 LAURENT PERRIER LA CUVEE 375ML 375ML 12 41.07 46.00 496.00 Champagne 13907 LAURENT PERRIER LA CUVEE 3L 3L 1 424.11 475.00 475.00 Champagne 13905 LAURENT PERRIER LA CUVEE 750ML 750ML 6 71.43 80.00 432.00 Champagne 13129 LAURENT PERRIER ROSE 1.5L 1.5L 3 350.00 392.00 1,058.00 Champagne 12574 LAURENT PERRIER ROSE BRUT 750ML 6 119.64 134.00 723.00 Sparkling Wine Item Description Size Per CS EA ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol (COVID -19)
    A.D.V.I.C.E - Topic 4: Alcohol (COVID -19) Background As we all are aware, the UK and the rest of the world are currently in a period of our history which is unprecedented. We have not seen restrictions like this since WW2. On 24 March 2020, the Prime Minister introduced social distancing guidelines and announced that most businesses will close. This included our much- loved pubs, clubs and restaurants. We were also told that we should work from home if we can. Some workers have been laid off for a short time which is commonly known as being furloughed. Alcohol and Mental Health For those of you that are working from home or have been furloughed, you will find that you have a lot more time on your hands than usual or become bored and this can have an effect on your mental health. As a result, you may think that having a drink and there is nothing wrong with that, but like most things Alcohol should be consumed in moderation. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been an increase of 31.4% in alcohol sales purchased from off-licenses. This has led to concerns that we are drinking more at home and you may think that is ok as the pubs are closed, but before the restrictions were in place, you may want to ask yourself “Did I go to the Pub every night” While alcohol can have a very temporary positive impact on our mood, in the long term it can cause big problems for our mental health.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rational Approach to Alcohol Taxation
    A rational approach to alcohol taxation Christopher Snowdon Executive Summary Excessive drinking creates costs to public services which the government can recoup through alcohol taxes, thereby making drinkers internalise the costs. However, in Britain, the alcohol duty regime is excessive and illogical. Not only do revenues from alcohol duty far exceed the costs to public services, but units of alcohol are taxed at dramatically different rates depending on what type of drink they are in. The tax on a unit of alcohol ranges from 7p to 34p. A flat rate of 9p on every unit of alcohol sold would raise approximately £4.6 billion (at current rates of consumption), totally off-setting the external costs of drinking to public services. Alcohol would continue to earn the government additional revenue in the form of VAT on the product, VAT on the duty, and other taxation on the alcohol and hospitality industry. A 9p/unit tax would pay for all the costs incurred to public services by alcohol abuse and would incentivise the development of lower strength drinks across the board. It would also effectively create a minimum unit price of 11p (including VAT on the duty). Alcohol duty evasion, currently valued at £1.8 billion per annum, would likely fall as a result of the lower price of beer, wine and spirits. A 9p/unit tax would ensure that alcohol duty is a tax on alcohol, not an arbitrary tax on fluids. EU regulation currently prohibits this system of alcohol taxation. Outside of the EU, Britain will no longer be constrained.
    [Show full text]
  • FS Price 032017.Pdf
    Regulation of the price of alcohol is one of the main tools used by governments to address alcohol-related harm. This factsheet provides an overview of the main issues around alcohol pricing, with particular focus on the UK. It starts with an overview of alcohol pricing in the UK, starting with an explanation of the determinants of the price of alcohol, before looking in detail at the price paid for different alcoholic products by different consumers in the UK, and how this has changed in recent years. The factsheet then looks at how the price of alcohol affects both the level of consumption and the level of various harms, showing that there is a wealth of evidence indicating that cheaper alcohol leads to people drinking more and suffering greater harms. It then turns to different policy measures that seek to influence the price of alcohol, beginning with alcohol taxes. The factsheet runs through the economic theory behind alcohol taxation. It shows that taxes are in general associated with higher prices and lower harm, though different retailers vary in the extent to which they pass through alcohol taxes. The factsheet then provides an overview of the current level and structure of UK taxes, and how this has changed over time. Next, the factsheet discusses another prominent pricing policy – minimum unit pricing (MUP). It starts with an account of the political and legal debate around the introduction of MUP in Scotland (where legislation was passed in 2012 but is yet to come into force) and the rest of the British Isles (where the Westminster government reneged on a commitment to MUP, and other nations have explored the policy to differing extents).
    [Show full text]
  • (Vanilla Vodka, Otto's Vermouth, Pomegranate Puree, Lemon Juice
    Vodka Based: - Cobbler (Vanilla vodka, Otto’s Vermouth, Pomegranate Puree, Lemon Juice, Cranberry & Hibiscus Shrub) - Green Apple (Pear Vodka, Midori Melon Liqueur, Apple Juice, Elderflower Cordial, Lemon Juice, Mint) - Madhatter (Raspberry Vodka, Orange Liqueur, Vanilla syrup, Magic Juice, Lime Juice) - Milking It (Milk-Washed Vodka, Loch Fyne Honey & Ginger Whisky Liqueur, Lemon Juice, Honey) - Peach Dragon (Chilli Vodka, Peach Schnapps, Peach Puree, Raspberries, Cranberry Juice, Corriander) - Pornstar Martini (Vanilla Vodka, Passionfruit Liqueur, Passionfruit Puree, Vanilla Syrup, Pineapple Juice, Lime Juice, Prosecco) Gin Based: - Basil & Thyme (Gin, Chartreuse, Lemon Juice, Thyme Syrup, Basil & Rosemary) - Breakfast Martini (Earl Grey Tea Infused gin, Orange Liqueur, Orange Marmalade, Lemon Juice & Sugar Syrup) - Cucumber Bath (Granny Smith Apple & Cucumber Infused Gin, Apple Schnapps, Apple Juice, Cucumber, Lime Juice, Apple & Cucumber Foam) - Dirty Martini (Olive Oil Gin, Dry Vermouth, Olive) - Honey & Hibiscus Sour (Loch Fyne Gin, Elderflower Liqueur, Honey & Hibiscus Syrup, Lemon Juice, Egg White) - Snap, Apple & Pop (Apple & Mint Tea Infused Gin, Elderflower Liqueur, Apple Juice, Sugar Snap Peas & Lime Juice) Rum Based: - Decadence (Rum, Pear Infused Cognac, Apple Juice, Spiced Meringue Foam (Egg White, Cinnamon Sugar Syrup & Lime Juice) - Jamaican Passion (Coconut Rum, Passionfruit Puree, Passionfruit, Lime, Sugar Syrup) - Kiwi & Coconut Cooler (Rum, Coconut rum, Kiwi, Lime Juice, Coconut Syrup, Apple Juice & Coconut Water)
    [Show full text]