DOCSLIB.ORG

Kent MWLP Sustainability Appraisal Scoping

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Kent County Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Minerals and Waste Development Framework Revision Schedule Scoping Report – Introductory Paper March 2010 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August Draft for Mark Fessey Steve Smith Jeremy Richardson 2009 consultation Assistant Consultant Associate Technical Director 02 March 2010 Final Scoping Mark Fessey Steve Smith Jeremy Richardson Report Consultant Associate Technical Director Ian Brenkley Consultant Scott Wilson 6-8 Greencoat Place London SW1P 1PL Tel: +44 (0)20 7798 5000 This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's Fax: +44 (0)20 7798 5001 appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed www.scottwilson.com to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion. © Scott Wilson Ltd 2010 Kent County Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Minerals and Waste Development Framework Table of Contents 1 Introduction .........................................................................................2 1.1 This report......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Sustainability Appraisal..................................................................................................... 2 2 Consultation Responses ...................................................................10 List of Tables Table 1: The SA Framework ...........................................................................................................................6 Table 2: Requirements of the SEA Directive and links to the SA questions...................................................8 Table 3: Consultation responses and revisions made to the Scoping Report..............................................11 List of Figures Figure 1: SA and plan-making process...........................................................................................................3 Figure 2: Local authorities within Kent ............................................................................................................5 Scoping Report - Introduction March 2010 1 Kent County Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Minerals and Waste Development Framework 1 Introduction 1.1 This report 1.1.1 Set out below is an introduction to the Scoping Report for the Sustainability Appraisal of the Kent Minerals and Waste Development Framework (MWDF). Scoping involves developing the framework for undertaking the appraisal, together with the evidence base to inform it. Scoping can, therefore, be seen to set the boundaries for and focus the appraisal. This Scoping Report has been subject to consultation with stakeholders and subsequently amended. 1.1.2 This Introduction Paper introduces the scoping process, as well as the other stages of SA. The final section of this Paper summarises the consultation responses that were received on this Scoping Report, and the changes that were made. 1.1.3 The remainder of the Scoping Report comprises a series of 14 ‘topic papers’, each of which sets out the framework and evidence base for particular issues. 1.2 Sustainability Appraisal 1.2.1 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Sustainability Appraisal (SA) aim to ensure that a strategy is environmentally sound and promotes sustainable development. 1.2.2 The KMWDF is subject to SEA and SA under two different regulations: SEA is required under the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 20041; and SA is required under the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) Regulations 20082. Many of the requirements of SA and SEA overlap, so they are typically carried out jointly. 1.2.3 The SA process is based on a five-stage (A –E) approach which is closely integrated with the plan-making process and based on the Guidance issued by the department of Communities and Local Government (CLG)3 – see Figure 1. 1 Available @: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2004/20041633.htm (accessed 01/09) 2 Available @: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20081371_en_1 (accessed 01/09) 3 ODPM (2005) Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Documents. Available from: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/sustainabilityappraisal Scoping Report - Introduction March 2010 2 Kent County Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Minerals and Waste Development Framework Figure 1: SA and plan-making process Plan making process Sustainability Appraisal Develop an (evidence Develop an evidence based) framework for base to inform the plan the SA and an evidence Stage A base to inform it. Produce a Scoping Report Consider options for Appraise the plan the plan and prepare a Iterative options, and preferred Stage B draft plan option. Prepare the SA Report Finalise the draft plan documenting the SA Stage C process and findings Consult stakeholders on the draft plan Consult stakeholders on (supported by the SA) the SA Report Appraise any significant changes to the plan Stage D Finalise plan in light of following consultation consultation submit and produce a revised plan for Government SA Report. inspection Publish and adopt Plan Monitor plan implementation Stage E including sustainability effects Scoping Report - Introduction March 2010 3 Kent County Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Minerals and Waste Development Framework Stage A - scoping 1.2.4 This Scoping Report will set out the findings of Stage A of the SA process – the scoping stage. Scoping involves reviewing evidence of relevance to the SA of the KMWDF, before establishing a framework for undertaking the SA. This Scoping Report has organised the collection and consideration of evidence in 14 topic papers: 1. Air Quality; 2. Biodiversity; 3. Climate Change and Flood-risk 4. Community and Well-being (including equalities and health); 5. Economy and Employment; 6. Heritage; 7. Housing; 8. Land; 9. Landscape; 10. Minerals; 11. Rural Areas; 12. Transport; 13. Waste; and 14. Water. 1.2.5 These topics were identified as the most appropriate around which to organise the collection of evidence following discussions with Kent County Council. In particular, the Council identified that it was important to ensure that a full and transparent consideration be given to issues relating to equalities, health and rural areas. 1.2.6 As well as reviewing evidence according to thematic topics, there is also a consideration of how the evidence varies spatially within Kent. As such, each topic paper will include a considerable spatial emphasis. In particular, evidence and key issues will be considered for each of the three ‘sub-regions’ in Kent, as identified in the South East Plan (2009). There is also a consideration of how the baseline varies across the 12 local authorities within Kent (see Figure 2) Scoping Report - Introduction March 2010 4 Kent County Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Minerals and Waste Development Framework Figure 2: Local authorities within Kent 1.2.7 Within each topic paper a logical 4 stage approach to scoping evidence is clearly set out: i. Reviewing key policies, plans, programmes strategies and initiatives (PPPSIs) that set the sustainability context for the KMWDF (e.g. Government White Papers, the South East Regional Spatial Strategy) ii. Reviewing information that shows the current and likely future state of the sustainability baseline in Kent iii. Highlighting the key sustainability issues and problems facing the county that are of relevance to minerals and waste planning iv. Develop the SA framework from the list of key issues and problems, also taking account of any other evidence gathered at the PPPSI and baseline review stages. 1.2.8 The final stage of scoping under each topic involves considering how the evidence collated through the preceding three stages should feed into the SA framework. There is no assumption that one sustainability objective will be developed relating to each topic. Rather, the evidence may highlight that there is a need for more than one sustainability objective relating to a topic, or, conversely, may identify that the topic is best considered as a sub-objective under an objective more closely related to another topic. 1.2.9 Set out below is the complete list of objectives and sub-objectives that form the SA Framework. It is important to recognise from the outset that, although the whole spectrum of sustainability issues has been considered through this scoping, there are many issues that are of limited or no relevance to minerals and waste planning. These issues have been scoped out, and so are not reflected in the SA Framework. Scoping Report - Introduction March 2010 5 Kent County Council Sustainability Appraisal of the Minerals and Waste Development Framework Table 1: The SA Framework Objective Sub-objective Reduce the risk of flooding and the resulting Ensure that development does not lead to increased detriment to
Recommended publications
  • Display PDF in Separate

    Display PDF in Separate

    EA - Southern EA LEAPs local environment agency plan MEDWAY LEAP ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW JANUARY 1999 EAST GRINSTEAD I En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Medway Area Key Details General Water Quality Area (sq km) 1780.99 River ecosystem classification as % of the Medway catchment between 1995-1997 Administrative Details Class Councils and % of the RE1 8 Kent Area they Administer RE2 30 Kent CC 67.1 RE3 12 Medway C 9.9 RE4 15 Surrey CC 8.2 RE5 1 East Sussex CC 12.5 Chemical GQA as % of sites in each class for West Sussex CC 2.3 the Medway catchment rivers in 1995 Class Population A 9 Year Population B 35 1991 734 000 C 35 2001 (Estimate) 755 000 D * 14 E 6 F 1 Water Resources Rainfall (mm/yr) Average 729 Pollution Prevention & Control Drought Conditions 571 Licensed Waste Sites 96 Number of licensed abstractions Surface Water 265 Process Industry Regulations Groundwater 201 21 (PIus two proposed) Impoundments 42 Radioactive Substance Regulations Authorised sites to accumulate and dispose of Conservation radioactive waste 8. Sites of Special Scientific Interest 49 Water Dependant SSSIs 30 Special Areas of Conservation 0 Flood Defence Special Protection Areas 0 Length (km) Ramsar Sites 3 Main River including tidal lengths 259.74 National Nature Reserves 2 Sea Defences Agency responsibility 11.66 Local Nature Reserves 0 Tidal Banks 55.33 Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty 0 Length of Inland Navigation 31km Fisheries Length of EC Designated Fisheries (km): Cyprinid Freshwater 87.2 Tidal 0 Salmonid Freshwater Bewl Water Tidal 0 DPC This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below.
  • Larkfield Risk Profile

    Larkfield Risk Profile

    Review of Emergency Response Provision: Larkfield Cluster Risk Profile RERP – Larkfield Cluster Risk Profile Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Description of Cluster ............................................................................................................ 4 Cluster Demographics and Population Risk Factors.............................................................. 5 Deprivation ............................................................................................................................ 8 Overall Cluster Risk .............................................................................................................. 9 Dwellings ........................................................................................................................... 9 Special Service ................................................................................................................ 10 Geodemographic Segmentation .......................................................................................... 11 Cluster Geodemographic Segmentation .......................................................................... 12 Building Usage as a Risk Identifier ...................................................................................... 14 Other Building Risk ............................................................................................................. 15 Sleeping Accommodation
  • Annual Monitoring Report (AMR)

    Annual Monitoring Report (AMR)

    Tonbridge and Malling Borough Local Development Framework Monitoring Report 2009 CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and content of the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR)........................................................ 1 Geography....................................................................................................................................... 1 History ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Employment and the Economy ....................................................................................................... 2 Population........................................................................................................................................ 3 Age Structure................................................................................................................................... 3 Ethnicity ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Environmental Protection ................................................................................................................ 4 SECTION 2 - LDF PROGRESS............................................................................................................. 7 Local Development Scheme ..........................................................................................................
  • Download: Annual Monitoring Report

    Download: Annual Monitoring Report

    ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Monitoring the Local Development Framework for Tonbridge & Malling December 2012 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Local Development Framework Monitoring Report 2012 CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Content of the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) ......................................................................................... 1 Geography ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Employment and the Economy .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Population and Households ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Ethnicity ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Environmental Protection .................................................................................................................................................. 4 SECTION 2 - LDF PROGRESS ............................................................................................................. 6 Local Development Scheme .............................................................................................................................................
  • Local Plan DRAFT

    Local Plan DRAFT

    APPENDIX 1 Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Local Plan DRAFT Regulation 19 Pre-Submission Publication July 2018 Foreword The Borough of Tonbridge and Malling is a diverse and characterful place. It includes areas of recent development and growth together with historic environments. Its geography is varied and the physical characteristics have and will continue to reflect patterns of land use and activity. It is a place where traditional and modern businesses thrive, where established and new communities have flourished but where pressures on community facilities, transport infrastructure and the environment are challenging. The Borough Council, working with a wide range of partners, have embraced the benefit of strategic planning over decades. That has been beneficial in shaping development and properly addressing needs for homes, jobs and supporting facilities in a planned way. Moving forward the continuation of that approach is ever more challenging, but in providing a sustainable and planned approach to our borough and providing for local needs this Plan takes on that challenge. This Local Plan relates closely to the borough and communities it will serve. It reflects national planning policy and shapes that locally, based on what is seen locally as the most important planning issues taking account of locally derived evidence. It is designed as a plan that is responsible in facing up to difficult choices and one which is based upon fostering care in the way we plan for this and future generations of Tonbridge and Malling. It provides a sound basis on which to judge planning applications, achieve investment and provide confidence about future development and future preservation where both are appropriate.
  • Risk Maps for Individual Host Species and Lists of Designated Sites at Risk

    Risk Maps for Individual Host Species and Lists of Designated Sites at Risk

    APPENDIX 2: RISK MAPS FOR INDIVIDUAL HOST SPECIES AND LISTS OF DESIGNATED SITES AT RISK. Figure 1 Risk posed to V. myrtillus under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 2 Figure 2 Risk posed to V. vitis-idaea under the three different risk scenarios. ....................... 3 Figure 3. Risk posed to C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 4 Figure 4 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 5 Figure 5 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ..................................................................................... 6 Figure 6 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 7 Figure 7 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ........................................................................................... 8 Figure 8 Risk posed to SACs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 9 Figure 9 Risk posed to SACs for species, V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ................................................................................... 10 Table 1 Lists of all SPAs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. ................................................... 11 Table 2 Lists of all SACs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios.
  • Download: Annual Monitoring Report

    Download: Annual Monitoring Report

    ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Monitoring the Local Development Framework for Tonbridge & Malling December 2010 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Local Plan Monitoring Report 2010 CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and content of the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR)........................................................................ 1 Geography ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Employment and the Economy ....................................................................................................................... 1 Population and Households ............................................................................................................................ 2 Ethnicity .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Protection................................................................................................................................3 SECTION 2 - LDF PROGRESS............................................................................................................. 4 Local Development Scheme ........................................................................................................................... 4 The First Tranche...........................................................................................................................................
  • Preliminary Ecological Appraisal

    Preliminary Ecological Appraisal

    PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL FOR BARNFIELD COTTAGE, STONE STREET ROAD, IVY HATCH Date of report 27th November 2020 Amendment 9th December 2020 Date of survey 18th November 2020 Author Jenny Passmore Reviewer Christian Gunn Client name Mr and Mrs McElroy Corylus reference 20144 CORYLUS ECOLOGY __________________________________________________________________________________________ CORYLUS ECOLOGY Unit A3 Speldhurst Business Park, Langton Road, Speldhurst, Tunbridge Wells, Kent. TN3 0NR Telephone: 01892 861868 E-mail: [email protected] Director: H G Wrigley (née Lucking) BSc. MIEEM Corylus Ecology Ltd Registered in England No 5005553 Registered Office: Henwood House, Henwood, Ashford Kent TN24 8DH VAT Reg No. 862 2486 14 CORYLUS ECOLOGY __________________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The proposals involve converting the riding arena into a single dwelling with associated landscaping. A bat and barn owl building survey has been undertaken and there was no evidence or potential for bat roosts noted. No further surveys are considered necessary. The building is suitable for barn owl however there was no evidence of use. No rare or invasive plant species have been recorded. Species typical of acid grassland have been recorded but the assemblage is not indicative of lowland acid grassland, which is a priority habitat community. Tree (T1) has been identified with ‘Low’ bat roost potential. No evidence of bat presence was noted on endoscope inspection. Advice has been provided if this tree requires pruning or felling. The Site supports ‘Low’ quality habitat for foraging and commuting bats and the impacts are low, so further activity surveys are not required. Advice has been provided to prevent the ground conditions becoming suitable for reptiles and to avoid the disturbance of the spoil piles during winter (1st November to 1st March).