DOCSLIB.ORG

Southbound Interstate 605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southbound Interstate 605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration Southbound Interstate 605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration Prepared by the State of California Department of Transportation Los Angeles County, California District 7-LA-605 PM R14.1/R14.6 EA: 07-34140/EFIS #: 0717000189 February, 2019 Southbound I-605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration Page Left Intentionally Blank i Southbound I-605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration Page Left Intentionally Blank iii Southbound I-605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 -LA -605- R14.1/R14.6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EA: 34140 PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to: Division 13, Public Resources Code Description The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), proposes improvements to the southbound Interstate 605 Beverly Boulevard interchange to reduce congestion, reduce weaving conflicts, improve safety, and improve freeway operations. The SR-91/ I-605 / I-405 Congestion Hot Spots Feasibility Report and Project Study Report – Project Development Support, approved July 2014, (PSR-PDS) for the I-605, I-5, and I-105 identified the southbound I-605 at Beverly Boulevard interchange as a congestion hot-spot due to the short weaving distance between the loop on and off-ramps. This results in decreased safety with a higher than average accident rate and contributes to congestion on the mainline freeway in the southbound direction. Additionally, the southbound interchange does not provide for southbound to westbound movement, and surrounding intersections sometimes experience congestion as a result of congestion on the ramp. Determination This proposed Negative Declaration (ND) is included to give notice to interested agencies and the public that it is Caltrans’ intent to adopt an ND for this project. This does not mean that Caltrans’ decision regarding the project is final. This ND is subject to change based on comments received by interested agencies and the public. Caltrans has prepared an Initial Study for this project, and pending public review, expects to determine from this study that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: The proposed project would have no effect on aesthetics, agriculture and forestry, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, transportation and traffic, and tribal cultural resources. In addition, the proposed project would have less than significant effects to air quality, hazardous materials, noise, and utilities and service systems. RONALD KOSINSKI Date of Approval Deputy District Director Division of Environmental Planning, District 7 California Department of Transportation iv Southbound I-605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration Page Left Intentionally Blank v Southbound I-605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration Contents 1 Proposed Project ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Location........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Project Description ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Project Alternatives .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.1 Alternative 1 No Build ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.2 Alternative 2 Diamond Configuration ............................................................................................... 6 1.4.3 Alternative 3 “D” Ramp ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.4 Features Common to Both Build Alternatives .................................................................................. 6 2 California Environmental Quality Act Evaluation ............................................................................................ 7 2.1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures ................................................................... 8 2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Forestry ........................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Agricultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3.1 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Regulations...................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.3 Affected Environment ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.3.4 CEQA Checklist Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 31 2.3.5 Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 33 2.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................................... 36 2.4.1 Avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation Measures ................................................................. 39 2.5 Cultural Resources.................................................................................................................................. 41 2.5.1 Avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation Measures ................................................................. 42 2.6 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................................... 43 2.6.1 Avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation Measures ................................................................. 45 2.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................................................................... 46 2.8 Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................................................. 47 2.8.1 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures ................................................................. 55 2.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................................ 56 vi Southbound I-605 Beverly Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration 2.9.1 Avoidance Minimization and/or Mitigation Measures................................................................... 58 2.10 Land Use and Planning ........................................................................................................................... 59 2.11 Mineral Resources .................................................................................................................................. 60 2.12 Noise ....................................................................................................................................................... 61 2.12.1 Acoustically Feasible Sound Barriers .............................................................................................. 71 2.12.2 Reasonableness Determinations .................................................................................................... 87 2.12.3 Construction Noise .......................................................................................................................... 88 2.12.4 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures ................................................................. 89 2.13 Population and Housing ......................................................................................................................... 91 2.14 Public Services ........................................................................................................................................ 92 2.15 Recreation .............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Commission Staff Report
    PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION: GPA2014 -01 AGENDA ITEM: PH -3 PREPARED BY: Craig Jimenez MEETING DATE: January 15, 2014 Planning Division Manager SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment GPA2014-01; Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-01; Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-02 Housing Element Update 2014-2021 REQUEST: Consider recommending to City Council adoption of the update to the Housing Element of the General Plan for the 2014-2021 planning period and adoption of a Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). APPLICANT: City of Monrovia ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: State law mandates that each city and county adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan, which guides future growth and development for the jurisdiction. Monrovia’s General Plan is the City’s long range view of its future. There are seven mandated elements: Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety. The purpose of the Housing Element is to establish policies and programs specifically to address Monrovia’s existing and projected housing needs for all economic segments of the community. The City’s current Housing Element was adopted in 2003 and was certified by the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). City Staff prepared a draft update in 2009. The draft document was submitted to HCD for review. Comments were received from HCD. However, during that timeframe the City instituted significant staff reductions and fiscal cutbacks and did not have the resources to finalize the document. There is no mandatory timeframe to update or adopt new elements with the exception of the Housing Element.
    [Show full text]
  • System Plan for Managed Lanes on California State Highways
    SYSTEM PLAN FOR MANAGED LANES ON CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAYS System Plan for Managed Lanes on California State Highways i; ~ r. i • • I I .... ~ . - System Metrics Group, Inc. Final Report October 2016 0 SYSTEM PLAN FOR MANAGED LANES ON CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAYS Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................... 1 Evolution of the District 8 Managed Lane System .................................. 43 List of Exhibits ........................................................................................... 2 District 8 Managed Lane Priorities .......................................................... 43 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 Performance of District 8 Managed Lane System ................................... 43 Study Approach ........................................................................................ 5 Managed Lane Pricing in District 8 ......................................................... 44 Summary of Findings and Conclusions ..................................................... 5 District 10 Managed Lanes ...................................................................... 53 District 3 Managed Lanes ......................................................................... 9 Evolution of the District 10 Managed Lane System ................................ 53 Evolution of the District 3 Managed Lane System .................................... 9 Performance of District
    [Show full text]
  • Whittier Boulevard Specific Plan
    Whittier Boulevard Specific Plan 4.0 Planning Area Land Use and Development Regulations This Chapter contains the regulatory portion of the Revitalization Plan, providing guidance for all new construction along Whittier Boulevard inside its designated Corridor Plan Areas. The Corridor Plan Area designations and their associated policies replace the typical Zoning Districts designated by the Land Use Plan of the City of Whittier General Plan. The Development Standards contained within the Plan will provide the sole means by which new private investment at any scale will do its part to ensure that the Specific Plan goals are implemented. Proposals for new construction will be required to adhere to the Development Standards for their respective Corridor Plan Area(s), according to the process described in this Chapter. 4.0.1 Applicability a. Other regulations. This document is not intended to replace or augment regulations pertaining to issues of building safety codes. All applications for new construction, substantial modifications to existing buildings, and for changes in land use, shall be reviewed for conformance with the policies contained in this Specific Plan. b. Applicability. The policies contained within this section shall apply to all new construction, and/or new land uses proposed for existing facilities. Nothing contained in this title shall require any change in any existing building or structure for which a building permit shall have been issued, and valid approved plans are on file in the Department of Community Development prior to the effective date of this Specific Plan. Changes in the property’s ownership or tenants of existing uses shall likewise require no change in any existing building or structure.
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan Launch Workshops Summary
    ENVISION WHITTIER GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LAUNCH WORKSHOPS SEPTEMBER 23 & 30, 2017 SUMMARY Overview The City of Whittier held four General Plan Update launch workshops in September 2017. Over 75 residents attended these workshops, which were at locations across the City to encourage participation from a diverse cross-section of the Whittier community. General Plan Launch workshops were advertised through social media, the Envision Whittier website, a local news site, the City’s website, and flyers. Partner stakeholders, including local community and business groups, promoted the event to their members. Workshop 2 (Ocean View Elementary School) and Workshop 3 (Whittier Train Depot). Date Time Location September 23, 2017 9 a.m. – 12 p.m. Parnell Park September 23, 2017 1 p.m. – 4 p.m. Oceanview Elementary School September 30, 2017 9 a.m. – 12 p.m. Whittier Train Depot September 30, 2017 1 p.m. – 4 p.m. Palm Park Envision Whittier | 1 The workshop objectives were to: 1. Engage residents in conversation regarding what they value most about Whittier 2. Present information on the General Plan’s purpose, process, and timeline 3. Generate excitement for the General Plan Update process and encourage the community to stay involved Community members were given passbooks and encouraged to visit the workshops’ five stations. Each station included a fun, family oriented activity where participants discussed key issues, opportunities, and ideas to inform the General Plan Update. The five stations were: 1. Where do you live? 2. What do you value most? 3. How do you get around? 4. How do we stay healthy? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 8229&8235Santa Monica Boulevard
    Two Office/Retail Buildings For Sale in West Hollywood, CA Value Add Opportunity & Santa Monica Boulevard 8229 8235 West Hollywood, CA 90046 WESTMAC Commercial Brokerage Company | 1515 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90025 | www.westmac.com | Company DRE: 01096973 & Santa Monica Boulevard 8229 8235 West Hollywood, CA 90046 Exclusive Listing by: CHRISTIAN C. HOLLAND T.C. MACKER, CCIM Managing Director President 310.966.4350 310.966.4352 [email protected] [email protected] DRE # 00942434 DRE # 01232033 WESTMAC COMMERCIAL BROKERAGE COMPANY 1515 S. Sepulveda Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Company DRE# 01096973 www.westmac.com ©2021 WESTMAC Commercial Brokerage Company. All Rights Reserved. WESTMAC Commercial Brokerage fully supports the principles of the Equal Opportunity Act. WESTMAC Commercial Brokerage Company and the WESTMAC Commercial Brokerage Company logo are registered service marks owned by WESTMAC Commercial Brokerage Company and may not be reproduced by any means or in any form whatsoever without written permission. 2 Santa Monica Boulevard 3 Offering Summary Two (2) Separate Multi-Tenant Office/Retail Buildings For Sale in Spectacular West Hollywood Location. Value Add Opportunity. The Opportunity 8229 Santa Monica Boulevard and 8235 Santa Monica Boulevard are two (2) office/retail buildings for sale in West Hollywood, CA. The combined square footage for both properties is approximately 21,906 square feet (per tax record). The total lot size for both properties is approximately 17,615 square feet. Asking Price 8229 Santa Monica Boulevard and 8235 Santa Monica Boulevard are two (2) separate buildings being sold together. Asking price is $13,400,000 ($612/SF). Due Diligence Access Interested parties can access rent roll, leases, and all other due diligence information by going to www.8229and8235SantaMonica.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Calming Policy a Procedural Guide to Neighborhood Traffic Management
    City of Whittier Traffic Calming Policy A Procedural Guide to Neighborhood Traffic Management Public Works Department 13230 Penn Street, Whittier, California 90602-1772 (562) 567-9500 February 20, 2001 (Established) April 26, 2005 (Revised) O:\Templates\Traffic Engineering Forms\TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY (Adopted 4-26-05).doc- 1 - Questions To Be Answered This report presents a Neighborhood Traffic Management and Calming Program aimed at making existing residential streets more livable by reducing traffic speed and volume. The pertinent questions are: 1. Which neighborhood or neighborhoods have the most immediate and correctable traffic concerns? 2. How can the City identify which neighborhood(s) should receive immediate attention? 3. What are the processes to be followed by the public and staff in recommending and deploying traffic calming technique(s)? 4. How should the implementation and maintenance phases be funded? 5. What monitoring method(s) should be used to measure the long-term effectiveness of the deployed traffic calming technique(s)? These five questions are the basis for the formation of the Whittier’s Traffic Calming Policy. Introduction The City of Whittier is nestled on the southern slope of Puente Hills and bordered by three (3) major interstate freeways: Interstate 605, Interstate 5, and the Pomona (State Route 60) Freeway. The backbone of the City’s roadway network is the arterial system consisting of Colima Road, Whittier Boulevard, Lambert Road, Painter Avenue, Beverly Boulevard and Norwalk Boulevard. These roadways provide access to motorists between the freeways and the local street system. As a result of the continuing growth in this region, the surrounding freeways and some of the City’s arterials have been experiencing an increase in congestion.
    [Show full text]
  • Parking for Filming Parking for Filming
    CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD PARKING FOR FILMING PARKING FOR FILMING Please reference the following list for basecamp, as well as cast and crew parking. Private Parking Lots / Structures (Cast and Crew / Basecamp) – Citywide 1. West Hollywood Gateway (Target) 7100 Santa Monica Boulevard at La Brea Avenue Ed Acosta, Parking Operations Manager (213) 926-6193 2. 9026 Sunset Boulevard – at Doheny Road, Behind Mahoney’s Tattoo shop Mark Issari (310) 266-5055 Restrictions: Nights and Weekends Available 3. Pacific Design Center 8687 Melrose Avenue Rubin Morales, AMPCO Parking (310) 360-6410 Restrictions: Parking in loading dock permitted 7a-10p only 4. Sunset Plaza - 8589-8711, 8600-8720 Sunset Boulevard (310) 652-7137 Gavin Murrell (6:30 a.m. to 2 p.m., M-F) Restrictions: Southern lot eastern, western edges have apartments 5. Pink Taco 8225 Sunset Blvd. Capacity: 300 United Valet (310) 493-6998 6. 814 Larrabee Capacity: 50 Harry Nersisyan (310) 855-7200 Additional Basecamping and Larger Profile Vehicles Accommodations - Citywide 1. Formosa Avenue @ The Lot W/S Formosa, south Santa Monica Boulevard Please contact City of West Hollywood Film Office at (323) 848-6489. City of West Hollywood Film Office – 8300 Santa Monica Blvd. – 3rd Floor – West Hollywood CA 90069-6216 – 323.848.6489 CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD PARKING FOR FILMING PARKING FOR FILMING Specifically within West Hollywood West, larger profile vehicles are also able to be accommodated on the following streets. Please contact City of West Hollywood Parking Operations Manager Vince Guarino for more information at (323) 848-6426. Beverly Boulevard (2 large profile vehicles) La Peer Drive (1 large profile vehicle) Melrose Avenue (1 large profile vehicle) Please contact City of West Hollywood Parking Operations Manager Vince Guarino for more information at (323) 848-6426.
    [Show full text]
  • West Hollywood, California's Go-To-Guide to the City's Three
    West Hollywood, California’s go-to-guide to the City’s Three Districts The Sunset Strip After decades of notoriety, the Sunset Strip continues to blaze its own path as a world-famous cultural landmark, setting trends in music, hotels, dining and shopping. This most famous stretch of Sunset Boulevard begins and ends in West Hollywood, and like the city it calls home, it is constantly breaking new ground and reinventing itself. Though it’s often been portrayed in movies like Sunset Boulevard, Almost Famous and Rock of Ages, visitors say that nothing compares to seeing the Sunset Strip up close and in person. Bordered on the west by Beverly Hills and on the east by Hollywood, this iconic 1.5 mile stretch of Sunset Boulevard features an array of world-class hotels, nightclubs, restaurants, shops and spas. Through the years, the Sunset Strip has seen it all, starting with the seedy glitz of the 1920s, when Prohibition fueled the rise of nightclubs and speakeasies. Because West Hollywood was not yet an incorporated city, this strip of Sunset Boulevard was lightly policed, making the Strip the perfect playground for the rebellious denizens of early Hollywood. By the 1940s, swanky nightclubs like Ciro’s, Trocadero and Mocambo reigned supreme, attracting A-list celebrity clientele like Marilyn Monroe along with less savory characters like gangster Bugsy Siegel, who called the Strip his stomping grounds. In the 1960s, the Sunset Strip became the major gathering place for the counterculture movement in Los Angeles. Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison were fixtures of the Strip and the surrounding West Hollywood landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Final Report of Issues and Opportunities Beverly Hills General
    Final Report of Issues and Opportunities Beverly Hills General Plan Community Character Committee I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................... i II. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 4 III. CITY COUNCIL CHARGE ...................................................................................... 5 IV. EDUCATIONAL PROCESS .................................................................................... 5 V. WORKPLAN............................................................................................................ 5 VI. IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES......................................... 7 Issue 1: Character-Defining Elements of Streetscapes ........................................ 8 Residential Objectives............................................................................. 8 Citywide Objectives................................................................................. 9 "Grand Boulevard" Vision for Wilshire Boulevard.................................. 10 i. Sub-Area 1: Wilshire Boulevard: Western City Limit to Crescent Drive .............. 11 ii: Sub-Area 2: Wilshire Boulevard: Crescent Drive to Robertson Boulevard.......... 12 iii: Sub-Area 3: Wilshire Boulevard: Robertson Boulevard to Eastern City Limit ...... 14 Commercial Corridor Objectives ........................................................... 15 i: Sub-Area 4: Olympic Boulevard.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H References
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ APPENDIX H ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REFERENCES AECOM. 2009. (water) Ahlering, Michael L. 1973. Report of a Scientific Resources Survey and Inventory: Conducted for the City of Huntington Beach, California. Archaeological Research Inc. Copies available from the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton, CA. Albert Grover and Associates. 2011. Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the Improvement Project. April. Ames, David L. and Linda Flint McClelland. 2002. “National Register Bulletin. Historic Residential Suburbs. Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places.” U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service, National Register of Historic Places. September. Barnes, L. G., and R. E. Raschke. 1991. Gomphotariapugnax, a new genus and species of late Miocene dusignathineotariidpinniped (Mammalia: Carnivora) from California. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science 426:1-16. Barnes, L. G., R. E. Raschke, and J. C. Brown. 1984. A fossil baleen whale from the Capistrano Formation in Laguna Hills, California. Memoirs of the Natural History Foundation of Orange County 1:11-18. Barron, J. A. 1975A. Late Miocene – Early Pliocene marine diatoms from Southern California. PalaeontographicaAbt.B 151:97-170. Barron, J. A. 1975b. Marine diatom biostratigraphy of the upper Miocene-lower Pliocene strata of southern California. Journal of Paleontology 49:619-632. Barron, J. A. 1976. Revised Miocene and Pliocene diatom biostratigraphy of Upper Newport Bay, Newport Beach, California. Marine Micropaleontology 1:27-63. Beier, P. and S. Loe. 1992. A Checklist for Evaluating Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20:434-440. Bruff, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Metro Westside Subway Extension
    This is a Draft Document Utility Conflicts Report Los Angeles Metro Westside Subway Extension Participants on this Report: Prepared By: PB America Inc.: Zafer Mudar, PE (commentaries) D'Leon Consulting Engineers Jose Varias 3605 Long Beach Blvd., Suite 235 Long Beach, CA 90807 D'Leon Consulting Engineers: T:(562)989-4500 / F: (562)989-4509 Domingo Leon, PE Email: [email protected] Sara Samaan Dung Quang Nguyen June 2014 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................................1 History and Background of the Westside Subway Extension Project ..............................................................1 Purpose and Need for Transit Improvements in the Study Area ......................................................................4 Alternatives Before Scoping Period .................................................................................................................6 Alternatives Considered in the Draft EIS/EIR................................................................................................11 2. Existing Utilities along Wilshire Blvd. Corridor at: La Brea Blvd, Fairfax Blvd, La Cienega Blvd. (Underground Stations).......................................................................................................................................................................27 Composite Existing Utilities - Description.....................................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • March 2013 (Website Copy)
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND DRUG EMPLOYERS TRUST FUNDS 2220 HYPERION AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90027 TEL (323) 666-8910 FAX (323) 663-9495 www.ufcwdrugtrust.org Administrative offices for: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND DRUG EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DRUG BENEFIT FUND Date: March 2013 (Website Copy) To: All Active Participants in CA – except Kaiser Employees who have Kaiser Coverage All Retirees in CA – except Retirees who have Kaiser Senior Advantage or UnitedHealthcare Secure Horizons Coverage Re: Participating Pharmacy Directory – OptumRx Dear Participants and Retirees: As directed by the Board of Trustees, pharmacies which do not have an agreement with a UFCW Local Union are to be removed from the OptumRx Network. Pharmacies could be added at a later date. Therefore, please take a moment to review the attached directory. Please remember, in order to receive prescription coverage under this Plan, all prescriptions must be filled by a participating pharmacy listed in the attached directory. If you attempt to fill a prescription at a pharmacy which is not included in the OptumRx Network, the prescription will not be covered under the plan. This office will continue to advise you of any changes to the OptumRx Network. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office or our Local Union Insurance Department. Sincerely, Trust Fund Office Extension #500 for Retirees Extension #503 for Actives * * Note: Kaiser Employees and dependents enrolled in Kaiser must use Kaiser pharmacies. OptumRx is not available to Kaiser Employees and their dependents enrolled in Kaiser. Note: Medicare Eligible Retirees enrolled in an HMO must use the HMO’s pharmacies.
    [Show full text]