DOCSLIB.ORG

February 28, 2018 Kimberly D. Bose

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
February 28, 2018 Kimberly D. Bose 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700 | Pittsburgh, PA 15222 844-MVP-TALK | [email protected] www.mountainvalleypipeline.info February 28, 2018 Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Docket No. CP16-10-000 Management Summaries Dear Ms. Bose: In its Notice to Proceed issued to Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC on February 15, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission stated: “[Mountain Valley] may not construct within the boundaries of the Underwood Farmstead (Historic Site LE-150) at about MP 44.6 … in Lewis County, West Virginia, until after Mountain Valley documents the completion of fieldwork via the filing of a Management Summary, as stipulated in our permission to implement treatment measures issued on January 29, 2018.” Likewise, in its Notice to Proceed issued to Mountain Valley on February 22, 2018, the Commission stated: “[Mountain Valley] may not construct within the boundaries of the Losch/Cunningham Farmstead (Historic Site BX-351) or use access road MVP- BR-090.01 at about MP 69.9, until after Mountain Valley documents the completion of fieldwork outlined in the Treatment Plan via the filing of a Management Summary, in accordance with Stipulation IV.H of the PA and as required in our permission to implement treatment measures issued on January 29, 2018.” Copies of the management summaries for the Underwood Farmstead (Historic Site LE-150) and the Losch/Cunningham Farmstead (Historic Site BX-351) are attached. By filing these management summaries, Mountain Valley has fulfilled all requirements and received all authorizations to begin construction in the areas associated with these resources. Ms. Kimberly D. Bose February 28, 2018 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (412) 553-5786 or [email protected]. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC by and through its operator, EQM Gathering Opco, LLC By: Matthew Eggerding Senior Counsel, Midstream Attachments cc: All Parties Paul Friedman, OEP Lavinia DiSanto, Cardno, Inc. Doug Mooneyhan, Cardno, Inc. 2200 Rice Drive | Canonsburg, PA 15317 844-MVP-TALK | [email protected] www.mountainvalleypipeline.info February 28, 2018 Ms. Susan Pierce Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer West Virginia Division of Cultural and History 1900 Kanawha Blvd, East Charleston, WV 25305-0300 Subject: Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule for Underwood Farmstead (LE- 0150) WVDCH FR # 15-67-MULTI FERC Docket CP16-10 Dear Ms. Pierce: On behalf of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Mountain Valley), a joint venture between affiliates of EQT Midstream Partners, LP and affiliates of NextEra Energy, Inc., Con Edison Midstream Gas, LLC, WGL Holdings, Inc., and RGC Midstream LLC, you will find enclosed 1 CD and 1 paper copy of Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation: Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule, Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) dated February 2018. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has been consulting with your office on the treatment of historic properties that will be adversely impacted by the proposed project. A document titled Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Revised Historic Property Treatment Plan: Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) (Treatment Plan), dated December 2017, was developed to document Mountain Valley’s efforts to coordinate with consulting parties and other stakeholders to identify mitigation measures appropriate to address the proposed project’s potential adverse effects to the Underwood Farmstead. The Treatment Plan also proposed mitigation measures designed to mitigate the adverse effects of the project. In accordance with Stipulation III.B.1 of the Programmatic Agreement (PA) for the Project, your office accepted the Treatment Plan in a letter dated January 11, 2018. In a letter dated January 29, 2018, the FERC indicated that it agreed with your office’s finding. This document, prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. on behalf of Mountain Valley, provides a proposed work plan and schedule for the implementation of the approved Treatment Plan and, per a February 13, 2018, teleconference between your office and Mountain Valley, fulfills the Management Summary requirement in Stipulation IV.H of the PA. In this teleconference, it was agreed that Mountain Valley would provide a status of the implementation of the Treatment Plan activities and a detailed work plan rather than a more traditional management summary that documents the successful conclusion of fieldwork activities associated with a treatment plan. This approach was suggested by Mr. Mitchell Schaefer (WVDCH) since many of the activities associated with this Treatment Plan will happen throughout the next 12-16 months and there will be numerous visits to the property to collect documentation, photograph the property during different seasons of the year, interview informants, and coordinate with the property owner. Ms. Susan Pierce February 28, 2018 Page 2 Should you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact Evelyn Tidlow by telephone at (612) 812- 5478 or by e-mail at [email protected]. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Matt Hoover Senior Environmental Coordinator Attachment: 1 paper copy and 1 CD with Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule for Underwood Farmstead cc: John Centafonti, EQT Corporation (without attachments) Sean Sparks, Tetra Tech (without attachments) James Marine, Tetra Tech (without attachments) Evelyn Tidlow, GAI (without attachments) MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY, WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE HISTORIC PROPERTY TREATMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) DOCKET NO. CP16-10 WVDCH FILE #15-67-MULTI Prepared for 2200 Rice Drive Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317 Prepared by 661 Andersen Drive Foster Plaza Pittsburgh, PA 15220 February 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 APPROACH AND ASSUMPTIONS.......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Summary of Progress to Date ......................................................................................... 2 3.0 WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE .............................................................................................. 3 3.1 January-April 2018......................................................................................................... 3 Meet with Property Owner to Collect Background Information ..........................3 Conduct Research for the Context for the Underwood Farmstead.......................3 Conduct Fieldwork for the Nomination .............................................................. 4 3.2 May-August 2018........................................................................................................... 4 Develop a NRHP Boundary and Period of Significance...................................... 4 Begin Preparation of the NRHP Nomination ...................................................... 4 3.3 September-December 2018............................................................................................. 4 Continue Preparing the NRHP Nomination and Conduct Fall Site Visit..............4 3.4 January-April 2019......................................................................................................... 5 Conduct Winter Site Visit and Meeting with the Property Owner .......................5 Preparation of the West Virginia Development Grant Program Application........5 Submission of Draft Nomination to Property Owner and WVDCH.....................5 3.5 May-August 2019........................................................................................................... 5 Delivery of Draft West Virginia Development Grant Program Application to the Property Owner.................................................................................................. 5 Revisions to the NRHP Nomination................................................................... 5 3.6 September-October 2019................................................................................................ 6 Preparation and Submission of the Final NRHP Nomination ..............................6 4.0 SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES............................................................................................ 6 5.0 QUALIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................... 6 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Correspondence Attachment 2 Schedule Attachment 3 Resumes i This page intentionally left blank. ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Mountain Valley), a joint venture between affiliates of EQT Midstream Partners, LP, NextEra Energy, Inc., Con Edison Gas Midstream, LLC, WGL Holdings, Inc., and RGC Midstream, LLC, has obtained a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (Certificate) from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act authorizing it to construct and operate the proposed Mountain Valley Pipeline Project located in 17 counties in West Virginia and Virginia. Mountain Valley plans to construct an approximately 303-mile, 42-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline to provide timely, cost-effective access to the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Fine Fiddle Gary DERBENWICK
    12 DECEMBER 2005 A Fine Fiddle Gary DERBENWICK . Colorado Springs . CO [email protected] [email protected] The Andre Watts concert that kept me from the picnic went great. He is skilled and musical, and his contact with the orchestra during the performance was at a level few soloists attain. This makes it all worthwhile. I had my violin reconditioned in Albuquerque last summer; it was long overdue. Down there at Robertson & Sons Violin Shop I had the opportunity to fiddle for about 20 minutes on the Havemeyer Cremona Strad violin, priced at $3.5 million. Pocket change for some, but I probably won’t see that opportunity again. One can check out Don’s shop, which includes a recital hall, on his Web site, including Bach solo violin music in the background. He has done very well, and I think he now does about 10 or 15% of the string business in North America. The first three pictures show Don Robertson (white beard) and his son with the Havemeyer Strad. The fourth picture shows me with the Strad (just so people know this is not a tall tale). The last two pictures show my violin after reconditioning by Don’s son. It is a Gand, one of the top French makers, and was made in 1849, among the last instruments he made. Gand is known for his orange red varnish and single piece backs. The picture shows it well. The backs are maple and the fronts are spruce, a more acoustic wood. The lighter spots are from wear and tear over the many years it has been used by its many owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    2200 Rice Drive | Canonsburg, PA 15317 844-MVP-TALK | [email protected] www.mountainvalleypipeline.info June 6, 2018 Ms. Susan Pierce Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer West Virginia Division of Cultural and History 1900 Kanawha Blvd, East Charleston, WV 25305-0300 Subject: Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation REVISED Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule for Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) WVDCH FR # 15-67-MULTI FERC Docket CP16-10 Dear Ms. Pierce: On behalf of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Mountain Valley), a joint venture between affiliates of EQT Midstream Partners, LP and affiliates of NextEra Energy, Inc., Con Edison Midstream Gas, LLC, WGL Holdings, Inc., and RGC Midstream LLC, you will find enclosed 1 CD and 1 paper copy of Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation: Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule, Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) dated June 2018. This revised document, prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. on behalf of Mountain Valley, includes clarifications and modifications requested by Mitchell Schaefer of WVDCH in an email dated March 27, 2018 (included as an attachment to the revised document). Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Evelyn Tidlow by telephone at (612) 812-5478 or by e- mail at [email protected]. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Megan Neylon Senior Environmental Coordinator Attachment: 1 paper copy and 1 CD with REVISED Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule for Underwood Farmstead cc: Sean Sparks, Tetra Tech (without attachments) James Marine, Tetra Tech (without attachments) Evelyn Tidlow, GAI (without attachments) MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE PROJECT REVISED MANAGEMENT SUMMARY, WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE HISTORIC PROPERTY TREATMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) DOCKET NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam Hill, Greenwich, Conn
    February 2010 Putnam Hill, Greenwich, Conn. Listed in the National Register of Historic Places on Aug. 24, 1979, the Putnam Hill historic district is small but coherent, with just over a dozen houses and churches from the late-17th,18th, 19th and early-20th centuries. Greenwich began in the 1640s as a manor under the protection of the Dutch at New Amsterdam. In the 1650s, the Dutch ceded their Connecticut land holdings – including Greenwich – to the colony of New Haven. The Connecticut Legislature formally declared Greenwich an independent town in 1665. The main thoroughfare of Putnam Hill is U.S. Route 1 – also known as East Putnam Avenue in Greenwich. Cutting through the historic district on the east-west axis, Route 1 is an historic remnant of the famous Boston Post Road that was the primary land route between New York City and Boston in the late-17th, 18th and early-19th centuries. 181 E. Putnam Ave. Putnam Hill played a small part in the Revolutionary War. Gen. Israel Putnam (c. 1718-1790) narrowly escaped the British on Feb. 26, 1776, The Trust for Architectural Easements is a leading by leaping over the hill’s steep precipice on horseback during a high-speed chase. force in the preservation of architectural heritage in When the redcoats declined to follow him down the slope, Putnam went on to the United States. The Trust protects more than 800 warn nearby residents of the British presence on the hill, according to local lore. historic properties in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Maryland, Virginia, Illinois, and The hill and street below it (Route 1) were named after Putnam, as was a nearby California.
    [Show full text]
  • Dedication of Putnam Hill Historic District Marker
    MEDIA ALERT DEDICATION OF PUTNAM HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT MARKER Wednesday, July 12, 2017 Noon Sidewalk in front of Tomes-Higgins House, 216 East Putnam Avenue Greenwich The Greenwich Historical Society and the Greenwich Preservation Network will dedicate a new historic district marker that outlines the history of the Putnam Hill Historic District, July 12 at noon. Elected officials, historic preservationists, Greenwich residents and others will gather to dedicate the permanent marker, located on the sidewalk in front of the Tomes-Higgins House, 216 East Putnam Avenue. The marker is sponsored by “The Townies,” a small group of Greenwich citizens bonded by their love of the town. Charles Hilton Architects donated the design and Cornerstone Contracting donated its services to install the marker. Putnam Hill Historic District The Putnam Hill Historic District joined the National Register of Historic Places in 1979. Once the center of the town of Greenwich, the district is named for General Israel Putnam, a Revolutionary War hero who in 1779 evaded pursuing British soldiers by riding from Knapp's Tavern down the steep hill to Stamford where he alerted the militia. General Putnam’s military feats are honored with the naming of Putnam Avenue (original King’s Highway), Putnam Cottage (Knapp’s Tavern), and Putnam Hill Park. His famous ride is depicted on the seal of the Town of Greenwich. Architecturally significant buildings in the district include the Second Congregational Church (1856), designed by Leopold Eidlitz; Calvert Vaux's 1861 Tomes-Higgins House (later Christ Church parsonage); and the 1909 Christ Church, by William S. Domenick, featuring Louis Comfort Tiffany stained glass windows.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Dynamic and Resilient Planning 4.5 Inventory and Assess Historic Resources
    4. Dynamic and Resilient Planning 4.5 Inventory and Assess Historic Resources Objective Determine the long-term viability of your community’s historic resources and prioritize preservation efforts. Complementary action: Assess Climate Vulnerability What to Do Best practices for historic places can be found within the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Places. The more you do, the more points you earn. 1. Inventory Resources (5 POINTS). Identify priority historic assets within your community, and actions required to sustain their long-term viability. Please include a short description of each location, and note if the location is privately or municipally owned. Assets may include: As per the Plan of Conservation and Development of 2009, there are many historic buildings and resources within Greenwich. Greenwich has an Historic District Commission (HDC) that develops new local historic districts and properties, and oversees exterior changes in these districts and properties. These designations have aided in the preservation of the historic character of these parts of the community. There are three Local Historic Districts: • Strickland Road Historic District in Cos Cob • John Street at Round Hill District • Stanwich Historic District There are two Local Historic Properties • Jeremiah Mead Homestead, Taconic Road - privately owned https://www.greenwichtime.com/realestate/article/Greenwich-couple-find-sense-of-peace-in- historic-11189219.php • Charles Green House, Round Hill Road – privately owned https://www.greenwichtime.com/local/article/Norma-Bartol-Colonial-homestead-gets-a-facelift-
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 2 March
    Connecticut Preservation News March/April 2010 Volume XXXIII, No. 2 Courtesy of DEP, Division of State Parks and Public Outreach From Stone House to Glass House Connecticut’s House Museums By Karin Peterson, Museum Director, Connecticut Commission on Culture & Tourism ew England is well known for its many historic N house museums and Connecticut alone has over 200. The Commission of Culture & Tourism invites the public to view an exhibit on Connecticut’s historic houses, “From Stone House to Glass House” in its gal- lery at One Constitution Plaza (second floor), Hartford during business hours. The exhibit opens April 1 with a special viewing between 3:00 and 7:00 p.m. and contin- ues through May 28. This exhibit tells the collective story of the state’s historic house museums by focusing on the opening of select museum houses and linking them to personalities, organizations and legislation. Women’s groups led the earliest efforts to save historic houses from uncertain futures. Town chapters of the Tour guides at Gillette Castle State Park, circa 1950. Daughters of the American Revolution began forming in Connecticut in 1892 and the National Society of Colonial General Assembly passed a resolution in 1899 naming it the State Dames, led by Elizabeth Colt, established a Connecticut Society Historical Museum. Shortly thereafter, a group of concerned in 1893. These fledging organizations were especially active citizens purchased the Knapp Tavern or “Putnam Cottage,” in in the first part of the 20th century. Their preservation efforts Greenwich, the 1779 headquarters of General Israel Putnam, to focused on saving old buildings associated with illustrious citi- save it from demolition.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Schedule REV.Xlsx
    2200 Rice Drive | Canonsburg, PA 15317 844-MVP-TALK | [email protected] www.mountainvalleypipeline.info March 9, 2018 Ms. Susan Pierce Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer West Virginia Division of Cultural and History 1900 Kanawha Blvd, East Charleston, WV 25305-0300 Subject: Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule for St. Bernard’s Church and Cemetery (NR#85001583) WVDCH FR # 15-67-MULTI FERC Docket CP16-10 Dear Ms. Pierce: On behalf of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Mountain Valley), a joint venture between affiliates of EQT Midstream Partners, LP and affiliates of NextEra Energy, Inc., Con Edison Midstream Gas, LLC, WGL Holdings, Inc., and RGC Midstream LLC, you will find enclosed 1 CD and 1 paper copy of Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation: Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule, St. Bernard’s Church and Cemetery (NR#85001583) dated March 2018. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has been consulting with your office on the treatment of historic properties that will be adversely impacted by the proposed project. A document titled Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Revised Historic Property Treatment Plan: St. Bernard’s Church and Cemetery (NR#85001583) (Treatment Plan), dated December 2017, was developed to document Mountain Valley’s efforts to coordinate with consulting parties and other stakeholders to identify mitigation measures appropriate to address the proposed project’s potential adverse effects to the St. Bernard’s Church and Cemetery. The Treatment Plan also proposed mitigation measures designed to mitigate the adverse effects of the project. In accordance with Stipulation III.B.1 of the Programmatic Agreement (PA) for the Project, your office accepted the Treatment Plan in a letter dated January 11, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Quide
    . Connecticut Quide A PROJECT OF THE STATE PLANNING BOARD PUBLISHED BY EMERGENCY RELIEF COMMISSION SHAHON /CORNWALL/ G03HEN ' NEW V \ FAIlrlELD ftJlOOXFIEL /tfACON* OXFOW / FALU; IDCEF!ELD,| REDDING \ STAMFOU \ ;K From the collection of the n z m o Prelinger v JJibrary San Francisco, California 2007 THK GOVERNOR'S GREETING Connecticut extends welcome to visitors on her Three Hundredth Anniversary. Here is a green and pleasant land, with fields and rugged hills, with forests where the dogwood and mountain laurel bloom, with rivers and lakes and rushing streams that still keep in their names the echoes of the long Indian past, with miles of fine beaches and friendly harbors along beautiful shores, with elm- shaded villages and modern cities, and with highways linking them to the quiet countryside. This book will help you to find these places of beauty and the many old houses that have come down from colonial days. It tells something of the State's history and of the Connecticut Yankee with inventive genius who became famous even at King Arthur's court. Every one of our towns has something of special historic interest. With this Connecticut Guide in hand and eyes alert for all that is worth seeing, your stay with us will give you in return rich and lasting rewards in remembered pleasure. WII.IH R L. THE CONNECTICUT GUIDE WHAT TO SEE AND WHERE TO FIND IT A Project of the State Planning Board Initiated under CWA and completed with FERA funds Compiled by Edgar L. Heermance Published by EMERGENCY RELIEF COMMISSION Hartford, Connecticut 1935 COPYRIGHT 1935 by Emergency Relief Commission Printed by Curtiss-Way Co., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Florida Society of the Sons of the American Revolution Fort Lauderdale Chapter Newsletter
    The Florida Society of the Sons of the American Revolution Fort Lauderdale Chapter Newsletter website: www.learnwebskills.com/sar/index.html MAY 2011 Fort Lauderdale Chapter chartered December 8, 1966 Volume 44 Number 5 President’s Message Fort Lauderdale Chapter Sons of the American Revolution Hello fellow compatriots, Minutes of Meeting on April 16 2011 Those of you who were absent from our Held at Colony West Country Club in April 2011 lunch meeting missed a very interesting and educational Tamarac, Florida program. It was given by a gentleman by the name of Bob Stone. He is very knowelegable about early Ft. Lauderdale & brought with him many large poster sized pictures of Ft. Lauderdale at the turn of the The meeting was opened at 1200 hours by President Ken century. Even those of us who have been in the area for many years Loomis with 6 members and guests in attendance. An Invo- would have a tough the naming the location of what was pictured. cation was offered by Jim Lohmeyer followed by the SAR This months program will be very good too Pledge and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, lead by the as it will be presented by Michael Kennedy who is very familiar with Chapter President. the history of south Florida. Hope to see you at the May meeting. By the way our Chapter's Liberty Tree program has been scheduled The President called for officer's reports, which proceeded as for this fall. follows: Michael Kennedy Guest Speaker Michael’s background includes years of owning and operating a • Vice President: not in attendance; small out island resort in the Bahamas.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Greenwich
    PPRREESSEERRVVIINNGG GGRREEEENNWWIICCHH A Guide to Understanding Historic Designations & The Organizations That Support Them © Greenwich Historical Society, 2010 D ESIGNATIONS There is a variety of designations for historic resources within the field of historic preservation. Most designations provide protection for the historic resource but in varying degrees. The following list defines those designations. STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT/PROPERTY The State Register is an official listing of These districts and properties are locally properties and sites important to the historical designated and enjoy a high degree of development of Connecticut. The criteria for protection. Once designated, no alterations inclusion are the same as for the National can be made to the exterior without first Register of Historic Places. All properties applying for a Certificate of Appropriateness nominated to the National Register must first be from the Historic District Commission. There are placed on the State Register. There is no three Local Historic Districts in Greenwich, specific protection afforded properties listed on Strickland Road and Mill Pond Court district in the State Register. In Greenwich there are nine Cos Cob, the Round Hill Road/John Street extant properties on the State Register that are district, and the Stanwich district, and two local not listed on the National Register. historic properties, 29 Taconic Road and 640 www.cultureandtourism.org/history/ Round Hill Road. www.greenwichct.org NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Listing on the National Register draws attention HISTORIC ZONES to the historical significance of the building, Planning and Zoning may grant Historic Overlay, object, district or road. While being on the list either Historic Residential/Office Zone (HRO) or affords protection against certain federal Historic Overlay Zone (HO), or Façade interference, it does not by itself prohibit Easement status to properties in Greenwich.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Sketches, Connecticut Daughters of the American Revolution
    ChapterSketches,ConnecticutDaughtersoftheAmericanRevolution ConnecticutDaughtersoftheAmericanRevolution,MaryPhilothetaRoot,CharlesFrederickJohnson MRS. S ARA T. KINNEY STATE REGENT CONNECTICUT DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION CHAPTER S KETCHES Connecticut DAUGHTERS O F THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION Ipatron S aints EDITEDY B MARY F HILOTHETA ROOT, A. B. Katherine Gaylord Chapter, Bristol Withn a Introduction by CHARLES FREDERICK JOHNSON, A. A. « « « « i -i PUBLISHED B Y CONNECTICUT C HAPTERS, DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION SOLDY B THE E DWARD P. JUDD CO NEW HAVEN . j 2 34021 \9i ' The d atiingist thing in history — simple truth.— Donald G. MITCHELL. IV c o we it to the generations that go before us, and to those which come after us, to perpetuate the memorv and example oj those who in a signal maimer made themselves serviceable to humanitv.— FREDERICK DOUGLASS. Entered a ccording to Act of Congress in the year 1901 by Marv PhilothEta Root. THE T uTTLE, MOREHOUSE A TAYLOR CO., NEW HAVEN, CONN. 1 I by a u nanimous vote of The Regents and Delegates of The Connecticut Chapters to MRS. S ARA T. KINNEY State Regent whose l ong and harmonious regencv has been conspicuous for its manv achievements, and whose wise leadership has won distinction and honor for connecticut daughters of the american revolution BADGEF O OFFICE FOR THE REGENT OF CONNECTICUT. (Votedy b the Chapter Regents and Delegates February, 1903. Designed and made by Tiffany & Co, of New York.) INTRODUCTION N a l etter from America M. Gaston Deschamps says in Lc Temps of the 31st of March, 19o1 : "On trouve encore dans la capitale du Connecticut ces 1 vestiges du passe auxquels les Americains ne sauraient renoncer sans detruire leurs titres de noblesse.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Putnam and the Escape at Horse Neck
    Israel Putnam and the Escape at Horse Neck “Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes!” General Putnam commanding the Continental Troops at the Battle of Bunker Hill, June 17, 1775 Start/Finish: Putnam Cottage, Greenwich, Connecticut Distance: 87.9 miles Terrain: Mostly country roads and some in town/city sections Difficulty: Moderate with some hills Only a painting of great violence, motion and energy could capture Israel Putnam’s life, the epitome of the physically robust and resilient Colonial farmer turned soldier during the American Revolution. A large mural in the Greenwich, Connecticut, town library does precisely that and so successfully that it had to be moved from an elementary school in town to its current location because many locals felt it was too overwhelming for children. But the mural’s peculiar blend of the macabre and electric energy captures the man and his times. On the far right, Native Americans try to burn him alive during the French and Indian War near Crown Point, New York (1758). They failed, only because of a sudden rain and a French officer who rushed in to put out the fire and return Putnam to Fort Ticonderoga (then under French control), for a prisoner exchange. On the far left, a she wolf fights her last fight as a group of angry farmers rush after her. In 1742, Putnam allegedly had himself lowered into her den by the end of a rope, armed with a torch and musket, and killed her. In the center of the image, a hefty, older Putnam rushes out of the canvas on a white horse with Redcoats in pursuit.
    [Show full text]