Israel Putnam and the Escape at Horse Neck
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Backstory Israel Putnam
UNITED STATES Constitution The backstory Israel Putnam (1718-1790) Israel Putnam was born in Salem Village, Massachusetts on January 7, 1718 to Joseph and Elizabeth Putnam. The Putnam family was very prosperous, and were prominently opposed to the Salem Witch Trials. When Israel was 22 he moved to northeast Connecticut in order to buy land because it was easier and cheaper for young men to buy land there. Putnam took part in the French and Indian War and was captured by the Kahnnawake (Mohawk Indians) in 1758. They were going to burn him alive, but he was saved by a rain storm and a French officer. After the French and Indian War, Putnam went back to Connecticut where he was elected to the Connecticut General Assembly during the Stamp Act crisis and was one of the founders of the state’s Sons of Liberty chapter. He was opposed to British taxation. By the time the American Revolution rolled around, Putnam had become a successful farmer and tavern keeper. The day after the Battles of Lexington and Concord began, Putnam learned of them and immediately left his plow in the field and headed to Cambridge. He was named Major General of the Army of Observation, which preceded the Continental Army. Putnam was second in command behind General Artemas Ward. He was instrumental in both the planning and realization of the Battle at Bunker Hill. Even though the famous phrase “Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes” is credited to Putnam; it is really unclear who actually uttered the phrase. -
Historical Study Guide
Historical Study Guide Light A Candle Films presents “THE BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL” Historical Study Guide written by Tony Malanowski To be used with the DVD production of THE BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL The Battle of Bunker Hill Historical Study Guide First, screen the 60-minute DocuDrama of THE BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL, and the 30 minute Historical Perspective. Then, have your Discussion Leader read through the following historical points and share your ideas about the people, the timeframe and the British and Colonial strategies! “Stand firm in your Faith, men of New England” “The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die.” - George Washington, August 27, 1776 When General Thomas Gage, the British military governor of Boston, sent one thousand troops to arrest Samuel Adams and John Hancock at Lexington in April of 1775, he could not know the serious implications of his actions. Nor could he know how he had helped to set in motion a major rebellion that would shake the very foundations of the mightiest Empire on earth. General Gage was a military man who had been in North America since the 1750s, and had more experience than any other senior British officer. He had fought in the French and Indian War alongside a young George Washington, with whom he still had a friendly relationship. Gage had married an American woman from a prominent New Jersey family, and 10 of their 11 children had been born in the Colonies. -
The Battle of Ridgefield: April 27, 1777
American Revolution & Colonial Life Programs Pre and Post Lesson Plans & Activities The Battle of Ridgefield: April 27, 1777 • The Battle of Ridgefield was the only inland battle fought in Connecticut during the Revolutionary War. • Captain Benedict Arnold was the main commander for the battle as the British marched upon a weak Colonial Army. Arnold's defenses kept the British at bay until the larger army could come later. • Brigadier General Gold Selleck Silliman of Fairfield was also involved in the battle. In the primary source letter below, he sends word to General Wooster that they need reinforcements. • Silliman’s 2nd wife, Mary Silliman, writes to her parents after the battle, relieved that her husband and son were unharmed. Although her parents are only a few towns away, she is unable to travel the distance. • Another primary source is a silhouette of Lieutenant Colonel Abraham Gould of Fairfield, who died during the battle. At the Fairfield Museum: • Students will view a painted portrait of Mary Silliman in the galleries. • Students will see the grave marker for General Gold Selleck Silliman, his first wife, and a few of his children. • Students will also see the grave marker of Lieutenant Colonel Abraham Gould. Fairfield Museum & History Center | Fairfieldhistory.org | American Revolution: The Battle of Ridgefield A brief synopsis – The Battle of Fairfield: General Tryon of the British army thought that he would be warmly received by the people of Ridgefield after taking out a Colonial supply post just days earlier. Tryon, to his dismay, learned that the town was being barricaded by none other than General Benedict Arnold. -
Student Activities Packet
Name: ____________________________ Date: _____________________________ Activity 1: Be a History Detective! Directions: There are many ways historians or museum professionals can learn about the past. Many times we think primary sources are only writings, letters, papers or books. Another way we can learn about the past is from artifacts or images. In this activity we are going to ask you to act like a detective – you will have 2 minutes to look at one image and then answer the following three questions. Imagine that this image was left behind with no description so think creatively and build a possible story about what it might be showing us. Answer these questions after spending 2 minutes look at the image. There are no wrong answers – but every answer must be supported by what you SEE in the image. 1. What is going on in this picture? 2. What do you SEE that makes you say that? 3. What else do you see? (Take a second look and add to your detective work!) 1 ©Keeler Tavern Museum & History Center 2020 Name: ____________________________ Date: _____________________________ Activity 2: An Introduction to the Battle of Ridgefield Directions: Read the following questions before listening to the presentation on the Battle of Ridgefield – it will help you know what to listen for! You can answer the questions as you listen or come back to answer them when the presentation is done. 1. When was Ridgefield established? Who was living in the area before the English colonists? 2. Why was Lott 2, the house of Benjamin Hoytt and later Timothy Keeler, a good place to establish a tavern? 3. -
Guidebook: American Revolution
Guidebook: American Revolution UPPER HUDSON Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site http://nysparks.state.ny.us/sites/info.asp?siteId=3 5181 Route 67 Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 Hours: May-Labor Day, daily 10 AM-7 PM Labor Day-Veterans Day weekends only, 10 AM-7 PM Memorial Day- Columbus Day, 1-4 p.m on Wednesday, Friday and Saturday Phone: (518) 279-1155 (Special Collections of Bailey/Howe Library at Uni Historical Description: Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site is the location of a Revolutionary War battle between the British forces of Colonel Friedrich Baum and Lieutenant Colonel Henrick von Breymann—800 Brunswickers, Canadians, Tories, British regulars, and Native Americans--against American militiamen from Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire under Brigadier General John Stark (1,500 men) and Colonel Seth Warner (330 men). This battle was fought on August 16, 1777, in a British effort to capture American storehouses in Bennington to restock their depleting provisions. Baum had entrenched his men at the bridge across the Walloomsac River, Dragoon Redoubt, and Tory Fort, which Stark successfully attacked. Colonel Warner's Vermont militia arrived in time to assist Stark's reconstituted force in repelling Breymann's relief column of some 600 men. The British forces had underestimated the strength of their enemy and failed to get the supplies they had sought, weakening General John Burgoyne's army at Saratoga. Baum and over 200 men died and 700 men surrendered. The Americans lost 30 killed and forty wounded The Site: Hessian Hill offers picturesque views and interpretative signs about the battle. Directions: Take Route 7 east to Route 22, then take Route 22 north to Route 67. -
NJS: an Interdisciplinary Journal Winter 2017 107
NJS: An Interdisciplinary Journal Winter 2017 107 Hills, Huts, and Horse-Teams: The New Jersey Environment and Continental Army Winter Encampments, 1778-1780 By Steven Elliott DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/njs.v3i1.67 New Jersey’s role as a base for the Continental Army during the War of Independence has played an important part in the state’s understanding of its role in the American Revolution, and continues to shape the state’s image as the “Cockpit of the Revolution,” and “Crossroads of the American Revolution” today. This article uncovers how and why the Continental Army decided to place the bulk of its forces in northern New Jersey for two consecutive winters during the war. Unlike the more renowned Valley Forge winter quarters, neither New Jersey encampment has received significant scholarly attention, and most works that have covered the topic have presumed the state’s terrain offered obvious strategic advantages for an army on the defensive. This article offers a new interpretation, emphasizing the army’s logistical needs including forage for its animals and timber supplies for constructing winter shelters. The availability of these resources, rather than easily defended rough terrain or close-proximity to friendly civilians, led Washington and his staff to make northern New Jersey its mountain home for much of the war. By highlighting to role of the environment in shaping military strategy, this article adds to our understanding of New Jersey’s crucial role in the American struggle for independence. Introduction In early December, 1778, patriot soldiers from Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia arrived at the southern foothills of New Jersey’s Watchung Mountains and began erecting a log-hut winter encampment near Middlebrook. -
The Triumph of Britannia?
CLASH OF EMPIRES: THE BRITISH, FRENCH & INDIAN WAR 1754 - 1763 CHAPTER 9 The Triumph of Britannia? FIER THE FALL OF NEW FRANCE and the stunning victories of the Seven Years' War, British officials turned their attention to the defense and administration of the newly enlarged American empire. For the first time, British leaders had to face the challenges of ruling large numbers of non-Protestant subjects. With 90,000 Catholic subjects in Canada, and at least 50,000 Native Americans (including perhaps 10,000 warriors) living east of the Mississippi River, a large military presence (7,500 regulars) seemed necessary. Rather than burdening British taxpayers, who had footed the enormous costs of the war, Great Britain now expected American colonists to pay for their own defense. At the same time, Parliament enacted a series of measures to centralize colonial administration and enforce trade laws. Once treated as imperial partners rather than dependents by the wartime administration of William Pitt, many American colonists bristled at what they believed was a systematic effort to deprive them of their British liberties. The burst of pro-British patriotic fervor that had briefly spanned the Atlantic Ocean quickly gave way to protests and recriminations. BRITONS OR AMERICANS? The 1765 Stamp Act and the colonial protests that followed have long been viewed as the first steps leading to the American Revolution. The decade that ended in April 1775 with the outbreak of rebellion in Massachusetts would be better characterized as a struggle to define the relationship between mother country and colonies rather than a drive for independence. -
February 3, 1975 To: Senior Administrators From: Robert E
OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS, OHIO 45701 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 3, 1975 To: Senior Administrators From: Robert E. Mahn, Secretary Re: Draft of January 18 Board Minutes Please report to me errors in the text by February 7. Supporting documents (those appearing in the agenda) are excluded from this draft, but will all be included in the official minutes. You need not return this draft. C72-0 REM:ed 4,1to 5 to P "P-Al fr..4L •/ ee„, lkje" /c< &ba\ 0-7 774,010\-4) ett; dte ,a, ; en, „I/4 Arc ct,"..r1 crvvi. Czo= c r__1.)z-7 , 41,1.6,19___,..e_tf _c -r. .„(__e_c 2 7174,-c_a_ 7-- 4174 t? .2_a t.-_.>-( r--e-----yr /IA ) ' c_e_<,-,-1 0 7M-- --J--°/€- / 3,_45 CID 4 -S- 1 t-- 5) 0-0261 2 PP (71; 7 - ea • tlei,,JAA:ri, c,■-tce:(1) - am_ t7gs---,___rt_ __ LArcIAL. 1-a-ast t_aor,f±, eza- accen-ovtl, ele2.010e-ega o ;77- t_w-ezt- .,Le„arizjz Liet-t-r • 1 AcAti_ c--evt-1 nn-L...wat opeat 44-1 ._a6tc--e:Ap At-ez_ (6,4 a r - • I • 1 •(0 c tnny—A kL,t—e-C A-01/ /2-C , e lug C co-e-/e-e tec A.ArciA/ cran--er/ n ,rzem af.frea„.. k Ma1 rAa---:41111. Meat= A a a-Ak II ciL e /Lc Atcce_t____„t lre_d (4.z.teid- )ItA64.- ciTCPI CM1 (kt)-LijAy,c2311 icAted Kt./ r. • 04%w-re -2 C-- , c, „ AD- 0 e e ; gr cr,A c xiirentL-e_._ —7/ outrkti-c.4_,?Lv-ez, -a 1: CAr14A-11 ,r- • 4 - cv Aacc ok.c, titc /4 56-27 -6-4z,- 4A--ef fr. -
A STORY of the WASHINGTON COUNTY UNORGANIZED TERRITORIES Prepared by John Dudley for Washington County Council of Governments March 2017
A STORY OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY UNORGANIZED TERRITORIES Prepared by John Dudley for Washington County Council of Governments March 2017 The story of the past of any place or people is a history, but this story is so brief and incomplete, I gave the title of “A Story”. Another person could have written quite a different story based on other facts. This story is based on facts collected from various sources and arranged in three ways. Scattered through one will find pictures, mostly old and mostly found in the Alexander- Crawford Historical Society files or with my families’ files. Following this introduction is a series on pictures taken by my great-grandfather, John McAdam Murchie. Next we have a text describing the past by subject. Those subjects are listed at the beginning of that section. The third section is a story told by place. The story of each of the places (32 townships, 3 plantations and a couple of organized towns) is told briefly, but separately. These stories are mostly in phrases and in chronological order. The listed landowners are very incomplete and meant only to give names to the larger picture of ownership from 1783. Maps supplement the stories. This paper is a work in progress and likely never will be complete. I have learned much through the research and writing of this story. I know that some errors must have found their way onto these pages and they are my errors. I know that this story is very incomplete. I hope correction and additions will be made. This is not my story, it is our story and I have made my words available now so they may be used in the Prospective Planning process. -
Eьfьs Putnam, and His Pioneer Life in the Northwest
1898.] Rufus Putnam.. 431 EÜFÜS PUTNAM, AND HIS PIONEER LIFE IN THE NORTHWEST. BY SIDNEY CRAWFORD. THE life of General Eufus Putnam is sb intimately con- nected with the history of the first century of our countiy that all the facts concerning it are of interest. It is a most commendable effort which has been put forth, therefore, during the more .recent years, to give his name the place it deserves among the founders of our republic. We boast, and rightly, of our national independence, and associate with it the names of Washington and Jefferson, which have become household words throughout the land ; but, when we come to look more closely into the problem of our national life from the beginning of it down to the present time, we find that one of the most essential factors in its solution was the work of Rufus Putnam. Although a man of humble birth, and never enjoying many of the advan- tages of most of those who were associated with him in the movements of his time, yet, in point of all the sturdj"^ qualities of patriotism, sound judgment and farsighted- ness, he was the peer of them all. To him, it may be safely said, without deti'acting from the fame of any one else, tlie countiy owes its present escape from the bondage of African slavery more than to any other man. Had it not been for his providential leadership, and all that it involved, as is so tersely -written on the tablet in the Putnam Memorial at Rutland, "The United States of America would now be a great siavehold- ing empire." He was the originator of the colony to make the first settlement in the, territory nortliAvest of the Ohio 432 . -
A Fine Fiddle Gary DERBENWICK
12 DECEMBER 2005 A Fine Fiddle Gary DERBENWICK . Colorado Springs . CO [email protected] [email protected] The Andre Watts concert that kept me from the picnic went great. He is skilled and musical, and his contact with the orchestra during the performance was at a level few soloists attain. This makes it all worthwhile. I had my violin reconditioned in Albuquerque last summer; it was long overdue. Down there at Robertson & Sons Violin Shop I had the opportunity to fiddle for about 20 minutes on the Havemeyer Cremona Strad violin, priced at $3.5 million. Pocket change for some, but I probably won’t see that opportunity again. One can check out Don’s shop, which includes a recital hall, on his Web site, including Bach solo violin music in the background. He has done very well, and I think he now does about 10 or 15% of the string business in North America. The first three pictures show Don Robertson (white beard) and his son with the Havemeyer Strad. The fourth picture shows me with the Strad (just so people know this is not a tall tale). The last two pictures show my violin after reconditioning by Don’s son. It is a Gand, one of the top French makers, and was made in 1849, among the last instruments he made. Gand is known for his orange red varnish and single piece backs. The picture shows it well. The backs are maple and the fronts are spruce, a more acoustic wood. The lighter spots are from wear and tear over the many years it has been used by its many owners. -
Microsoft Outlook
2200 Rice Drive | Canonsburg, PA 15317 844-MVP-TALK | [email protected] www.mountainvalleypipeline.info June 6, 2018 Ms. Susan Pierce Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer West Virginia Division of Cultural and History 1900 Kanawha Blvd, East Charleston, WV 25305-0300 Subject: Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation REVISED Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule for Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) WVDCH FR # 15-67-MULTI FERC Docket CP16-10 Dear Ms. Pierce: On behalf of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Mountain Valley), a joint venture between affiliates of EQT Midstream Partners, LP and affiliates of NextEra Energy, Inc., Con Edison Midstream Gas, LLC, WGL Holdings, Inc., and RGC Midstream LLC, you will find enclosed 1 CD and 1 paper copy of Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, Historic Property Treatment Plan Implementation: Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule, Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) dated June 2018. This revised document, prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. on behalf of Mountain Valley, includes clarifications and modifications requested by Mitchell Schaefer of WVDCH in an email dated March 27, 2018 (included as an attachment to the revised document). Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Evelyn Tidlow by telephone at (612) 812-5478 or by e- mail at [email protected]. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Megan Neylon Senior Environmental Coordinator Attachment: 1 paper copy and 1 CD with REVISED Management Summary, Work Plan, and Schedule for Underwood Farmstead cc: Sean Sparks, Tetra Tech (without attachments) James Marine, Tetra Tech (without attachments) Evelyn Tidlow, GAI (without attachments) MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE PROJECT REVISED MANAGEMENT SUMMARY, WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE HISTORIC PROPERTY TREATMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Underwood Farmstead (LE-0150) DOCKET NO.