DOCSLIB.ORG

1MC04 Main Works - Contract Lot S2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1MC04 Main Works - Contract Lot S2 1MC04 Main Works - Contract Lot S2 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) - Western Mound - Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement S2 MDL Code: None Document no.: 1MC04-SCJ_SDH-GT-REP-SS05_SL07-000035 Revision Author Checked by Approved by Date Reason for approved revision C01 Lourds Michael Mark Gaby Christiane 19/06/2020 For Acceptance Anthonypillai / Chendorain Hof Phoebe Chappell C02 Lourds Michael Carlos Gómez Steven Anthonypillai Chendorain Bodenham RNSP WP Final Re-Submission SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: OFFICIAL Handling instructions: None Revision changes, authorisation and reason for issue records: Revision Author Date Checked by Date Approved by Date Reason for revision authored checked approved C01.1 Lourds 06/03/2020 Michael 30/03/2020 Mark Gaby / Richard 30/03/2020 First Issue Anthonypillai / Chendorain Patten Phoebe Chappell C01.2 Lourds 16/04/2020 Michael 27/04/2020 Mark Gaby / 27/04/2020 For Acceptance Anthonypillai / Chendorain Christiane Hof Phoebe Chappell C01.3 Lourds 10/06/2020 Michael 19/06/2020 Mark Gaby / 19/06/2020 RNSP - WP Anthonypillai / Chendorain Christiane Hof Phoebe Chappell C02.1 Lourds 08/02/2021 Michael 09/02/2021 Carlos Gómez / Anthonypillai Chendorain Steven Bodenham RNSP WP Final Re-Submission Document Title: Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) - Western Mound - Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement S2 Document no.: 1MC04-SCJ_SDH-GT-REP-SS05_SL07-000035 Revision: C02 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Context 2 1.2 Report Contents 3 1.3 Associated Documents 3 2 Methodology 5 3 Data 5 3.1 Ground Investigations 5 3.2 Baseline Data Requirements 6 4 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology 6 5 Local Geology and Hydrogeology 7 5.1 Geology 7 5.2 Hydrogeology 9 6 Conceptual Hydrogeological Site Model (CSM) 10 6.1 Summary of Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement (RNSP) Western Mound 10 6.2 Baseline Conditions 12 7 Risk Evaluation 17 8 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 20 9 References 22 Appendix A - Drawings 24 Appendix B - Groundwater Contours and Levels 25 Appendix C - Groundwater Quality Data 26 Appendix D - Risk Methodology 27 1 Methodology 27 Appendix E - Chalk Dissolution Features - Additional Details 30 1 Summary 30 2 Additional Details 30 Template no.: HS2-HS2-IM-TEM-000-000265 Page 1 Uncontrolled when printed OFFICIAL Document Title: Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) - Western Mound - Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement S2 Document no.: 1MC04-SCJ_SDH-GT-REP-SS05_SL07-000035 Revision: C02 1 Introduction 1.1 Context 1.1.1 The Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement (RNSP) is located around 2.4km to the west of Ruislip, with the centre of the RNSP at an approximate location of 507104.4, 188401.5. It is part of the wider Ruislip Sustainable Placement (RSP; shown in Figure 1), which will be the onsite location for disposal of surplus excavated material to avoid causing environmental effects that would otherwise be associated with the offsite disposal of that material. The material will be derived from a single source and will consist predominately of naturally occurring Clay excavated from the Copthall Tunnel area. It will be deposited in two locations across the RNSP, known as the Western and Eastern mounds. Figure 1 - Location map showing both the Western and Eastern mounds of the Northern Sustainable Placement Area 1.1.2 This note provides a hydrogeological risk assessment (HRA) in relation to the proposed Western mound of the RNSP. It is one of a suite of documents that together will be submitted to the Environment Agency (EA) as part of an environmental permit for landfill applications for the RNSP. Applications for the Western and Eastern mounds will be submitted separately. 1.1.3 Given the permit application for the Western and Eastern mounds will now be submitted separately, a hydrogeological risk assessment will be conducted for both RNSP mounds Template no.: HS2-HS2-IM-TEM-000-000265 Page 2 Uncontrolled when printed OFFICIAL Document Title: Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) - Western Mound - Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement S2 Document no.: 1MC04-SCJ_SDH-GT-REP-SS05_SL07-000035 Revision: C02 individually. Therefore, this report supersedes the previous HRA for the RNSP, previously known as the Northern Sustainable Placement Area (Northern SPA) [17], which considered both the Western and Eastern mounds together. 1.1.4 Nevertheless, the overall hydrogeological conceptual model and site characterisation will be the same as for Eastern mound, only the risks will be assessed in isolation, confined to the proposed Western mound boundary. 1.1.5 The intent of this document is to provide a factual presentation of available baseline data, and to evaluate and assess hydrogeological risks due to the placement of material as described in this report. This report is not intended to provide an exhaustive discussion of existing baseline conditions. 1.1.6 The term ‘S2’ included in the title of this assessment refers to Lot S2 for Phase 1 of the HS2 scheme. Lot S2 extends from the western end of the proposed Old Oak Common Station and includes tunnels, shafts, a large crossover box excavation, portal structures, cuttings and embankments. 1.2 Report Contents 1.2.1 This report is structured as follows: • Section 1: Introduction, • Section 2: Methodology, • Section 3: Data, • Section 4: Regional Geology and Hydrogeology, • Section 5: Local Geology and Hydrogeology, • Section 6: Conceptual Hydrogeological Site Model (CSM), • Section 7: Risk Evaluation. 1.3 Associated Documents 1.3.1 This report should be read in conjunction with the following documents: • Environmental Setting and Site Design Report (ESSD) [9], • Environmental Permit Application Form parts A, B2, B4, F1, • Environmental Monitoring Plan [19], • Site Operating Plan (SOP) [20], • Stability Risk Assessment [21], Template no.: HS2-HS2-IM-TEM-000-000265 Page 3 Uncontrolled when printed OFFICIAL Document Title: Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) - Western Mound - Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement S2 Document no.: 1MC04-SCJ_SDH-GT-REP-SS05_SL07-000035 Revision: C02 • Management Systems and Procedures [22]. Template no.: HS2-HS2-IM-TEM-000-000265 Page 4 Uncontrolled when printed OFFICIAL Document Title: Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) - Western Mound - Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement S2 Document no.: 1MC04-SCJ_SDH-GT-REP-SS05_SL07-000035 Revision: C02 2 Methodology 2.1.1 The assessment of hydrogeological risk associated with the Western mound is based on the following: • Review of available ground investigation data (including groundwater monitoring data performed at a minimum of quarterly intervals from February 2017 through December 2019), • Development of a Conceptual Hydrogeological Site Model (CSM), • Semi-quantitative assessment of risks. A semi-quantitative assessment of risk is considered appropriate given the nature of the single source waste material to be placed, and the relatively low permeability nature of both the waste material and ground conditions at the RSP (as described below). Appendix D provides a summary of the risk assessment ranking methodology. 3 Data 3.1 Ground Investigations 3.1.1 The HS2-commissioned main ground investigation within S2 is formed from several works packages. The data used in this report is primarily from the North-West Ruislip (NWR) ground investigation and the South Package B (SPB) ground investigation. The details of the factual reports issued on completion of these investigations are listed in Table 1: Report Name Date / Revision Document No. NWR Final Factual Report 12th April 2019 / P02 1G089-FES-GT-REP-000-000019 SPB Final Factual Report 26th September 2018 / P04 1G107-FES-GT-REP-000-000010 Table 1 - GI data received relevant to the RNSP Western mound 3.1.2 Association of the Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) data and the Final Factual Report is available for the NWR package which covers Copthall Tunnel to the west of Breakspear Road South. The NWR ground investigation data has been used to assist in characterising the ground conditions and hydrogeology of the West Ruislip tunnel portal. 3.1.3 In situ tests specified for the NWR package include variable head permeability testing and groundwater monitoring. Laboratory test results available in the Final Factual Report for the NWR package include Particle Size Distribution (PSD), consolidation tests and shear strength. 3.1.4 In situ field testing and monitoring for SPB package that is considered useful for hydrogeological characterisation includes in situ falling head tests with standpipe piezometers and measurement of water pressure by vibrating wire piezometers. Template no.: HS2-HS2-IM-TEM-000-000265 Page 5 Uncontrolled when printed OFFICIAL Document Title: Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) - Western Mound - Ruislip Northern Sustainable Placement S2 Document no.: 1MC04-SCJ_SDH-GT-REP-SS05_SL07-000035 Revision: C02 3.2 Baseline Data Requirements 3.2.1 In support of the environmental permit for landfill application for the RNSP Western mound, baseline data has been compiled as follows: • Groundwater quality and water level monitoring has been performed at four installations at the limits of the RNSP (i.e. both the Western and Eastern mounds) at a minimum of quarterly intervals between February 2017 and December 2019, • Surface water monitoring has been performed at four installations between May 2017 and February 2018. 3.2.2 Ground gas baseline monitoring has not been conducted for the following reasons: • The material to be used for waste placement will be material from a single source consisting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Applications and Decisions for London and the South East Of
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 4058 PUBLICATION DATE: 28/06/2018 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 19/07/2018 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 05/07/2018 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS Important Information All correspondence relating to public inquiries should be sent to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Ivy House 3 Ivy Terrace Eastbourne BN21 4QT The public counter in Eastbourne is open for the receipt of documents between 9.30am and 4pm Monday to Friday. There is no facility to make payments of any sort at the counter. General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications and Decisions for London and the South East 4194
    Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Applications and Decisions Publication Number: 4194 Publication Date: 04/02/2021 Objection Deadline Date: 25/02/2021 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 04/02/2021 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] PLEASE NOTE THE PUBLIC COUNTER IS CLOSED AND TELEPHONE CALLS WILL NO LONGER BE TAKEN AT HILLCREST HOUSE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE The Office of the Traffic Commissioner is currently running an adapted service as all staff are currently working from home in line with Government guidance on Coronavirus (COVID-19). Most correspondence from the Office of the Traffic Commissioner will now be sent to you by email. There will be a reduction and possible delays on correspondence sent by post. The best way to reach us at the moment is digitally. Please upload documents through your VOL user account or email us. There may be delays if you send correspondence to us by post. At the moment we cannot be reached by phone. If you wish to make an objection to an application it is recommended you send the details to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE on the EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018
    COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE ON THE EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018 Chair of Landscape Partnership Lead Partner Colne Valley Park Community Interest Company Friends of the Colne Valley Park Spelthorne Natural History Society Front cover photo of Stockers Lake – Greg Townsend provide an essential project management tool for effective and efficient delivery. The partnership involved in preparing this LCAP considers it to be a compelling, innovative and realistic bid, with a range of projects which will connect people, biodiversity and access. ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ meets all the objectives of the Heritage Lottery Landscape The Landscape Partnership programme, run by the Heritage Lottery Partnership programme, with each of the projects proposed under the Fund, seeks to ‘conserve areas of distinctive landscape character’ and Scheme meeting at least one objective. promote a ‘holistic and balanced approach to the management of landscape heritage at a landscape scale’. Landscape Conservation Action Covering parts of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Greater London, Plans (LCAPs) required as part of this programme, provide the foundation Hertfordshire and Surrey, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ will for planned work to benefit heritage, people and communities and are harness and stimulate organisations and communities across the area to needed in order to secure the Heritage Lottery Fund grant towards the support and sustain delivery. Residents and visitors will gain positive proposed work. perceptions about the area, will learn more about the landscape and feel more confident about exploring it. They will be supported to assist in Our LCAP, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’, comprises a suite of ‘shaping their place’, and feel more motivated to venture out and enjoy exciting projects (the Scheme), and seeks to: set these in the landscape the area, and to participate in efforts to improve and maintain it.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillingdon December 2020
    Hillingdon December 2020 3-month construction look ahead Hillingdon December 2020 This forward look covers HS2 associated work in the London Borough of Hillingdon. The document includes: A forward look of construction activities planned in the next three months Works to be aware of that will take place in the next 12 months, but may not yet have been confirmed The dates and information included in the forward look are subject to change as programme develops. These will be updated in the next edition of the forward look. If you have any queries about the information in this forward look, the HS2 Helpdesk is available all day, every day on 08081 434 434 or by emailing [email protected] Page 2 Hillingdon Map 1 1 Page 3 Three-month look ahead Location of Proposed Description of works works duration Location 1 Ongoing until Colne Valley Viaduct, A412 North Orbital Way A412 North February 2021 Construction of a site entrance, haul road crossing Orbital Way and internal haul road from the South Portal site across the A412. Works include compound setup, fencing and some local stockpiling of materials, as well as ongoing archaeological and ecological works. The existing lane closure on the A412 will be in place until February 2021, operating 24 hours per day 7 days a week. This will be managed by temporary two-way traffic lights to allow traffic to continue in both directions. Multiple Ongoing activity Continuing with water quality sampling from locations River Pinn, Newyears Green Bourne and The Greenway Small samples of water taken from streams in the area on a monthly basis.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly MQT – 23 October 2013 15Th Mayor’S Report to the Assembly
    London Assembly MQT – 23 October 2013 15th Mayor’s Report to the Assembly This is my fifteenth report to the Assembly, fulfilling my duty under Section 45 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999. It covers the period 29 August to 9 October 2013. Executive Summary London and England’s largest cities join to call for greater devolution In an historic move, London Councils (the group representing the capital’s 32 borough councils and the City of London) and I have joined with the Core Cities group (representing Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham and Sheffield) to campaign for greater fiscal devolution for England’s larger cities. Together, London and the Core Cities account for over half of England’s economy and around half its population. Funding to tackle adult reoffending On 9 September, I announced almost £2million in funding for an innovative scheme to tackle adult reoffending across the London boroughs of Westminster, Kensington & Chelsea and Hammersmith & Fulham. Independent review of victim and witness services On 12 September, my Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, Stephen Greenhalgh, announced that a major independent review is to be carried out into the treatment of victims of crime and witnesses in London by Baroness Helen Newlove. New Safer Lorry Charge to protect cyclists in London On 4 September, the Transport Minister Stephen Hammond and I announced a package of measures to make lorries safer for cyclists in the capital. I also asked Londoners for their views on whether I should use my powers to levy a substantial "Safer Lorry Charge" on any HGV which is not fitted with basic safety equipment to protect cyclists.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Hillingdon Local Development
    London Borough of Hillingdon Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy October 2011 Consultation Statement - Regulation 30 (1) (d) Part 1: Issues and Options (Spring 2005) Consultation Statement Regulation 30 (1) (d) Part 1: Issues and Options (Spring 2005) Introduction 1.1 The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, whose relevant provisions came into force on 28 September 2004, introduced a new development plans system requiring the creation of Local Development Frameworks (LDFs). The LDF will replace the existing Hillingdon Unitary Development Plan (UDP) adopted in 1998 and subsequent Saved Policies UDP (September 2007). Unlike the UDP, the LDF will comprise a series of planning documents, both statutory and non-statutory that will set out Hillingdon’s policies and spatial strategy for meeting the economic, environmental and social aims and aspirations of the existing and future communities of the Borough. 1.2 The Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 set out the consultation requirements in preparing a Core Strategy. Amendments to the Regulations in 2008 and 2009 have since been adopted. It requires: • that we consult with key bodies as well as local people and businesses and take their comments into account (Regulation 25) • that we produce a statement setting out who was consulted, how they were consulted, what the main issues were and how the representations were taken into account (Regulation 30) 1.3 This statement has been prepared in accordance with Regulation 30 (1)(d) and sets out: • Who the Borough Council consulted on its Core Strategy DPD under Regulation 25; • how they were consulted; • a summary of the main issues raised as a result of the consultation; and • how those main issues have been addressed in the Core Strategy DPD.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications and Decisions for London and the South East of England
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 4095 PUBLICATION DATE: 14/03/2019 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 04/04/2019 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 21/03/2019 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS Important Information All correspondence relating to public inquiries should be sent to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Ivy House 3 Ivy Terrace Eastbourne BN21 4QT The public counter in Eastbourne is open for the receipt of documents between 9.30am and 4pm Monday to Friday. There is no facility to make payments of any sort at the counter. General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Lewisham November 2018 Extension of the Bakerloo Line the Government Is Making a Proposal to Extend the Bakerl
    London Borough of Lewisham November 2018 Extension of the Bakerloo line The government is making a proposal to extend the bakerloo line to reach as far as Hayes, Bromley. In addition, it touches more towns in Lewisham Borough and reduce congestion in road traffic. Single use plastic We have been tackling to reduce re-use and recycle single use plastic bags, but sometimes they fly away to the ocean. Over time, it shrinks until the material becomes microscopic and eaten by fishes as a mistake for plankton. We should re-use more of them & strong bags, so fewer of them are sent to the ocean by mistake. ` London Borough of Hackney Imagine a whale eating 50 yellow plastic bags in the ocean by Privatisation accident. Comparing a baby eating 50 plastic toys by accident. The empty land near Dalston Lane that has been isolated for a long time, should be for the public rather than private. This brings back to Lewisham. The empty land near Besson Street, New Cross; has not been dealt for at least 5 years. We believe that the pub was the problem, but flats are also destroyed. We are promised that they will build cafe, library, shops and gyms and residential houses. It is the question of when and will they? Dalston Square is suppose to be for the residents than the anti-social people. But at the moment, the anti-social people are dominating the area which damages local businesses and residents. Polices are not doing enough to stop them or move them, despite they are involving illegal substances to themselves and the society.
    [Show full text]
  • Pylon Farm, Newyears Green Lane, Harefield, 12579/APP/2011/1991
    Report of the Head of Planning & Enforcement Services Address PYLON FARM NEWYEARS GREEN LANE HAREFIELD Development: Variation of condition 1 of planning permission ref: 12579/APP/2006/673 dated 18/08/2006 to allow continued use of the land as an organic composting site. (Section 73 application) LBH Ref Nos: 12579/APP/2011/1991 Drawing Nos: Planning Supporting Statement 001 002 Date Plans Received: 15/08/2011 Date(s) of Amendment(s): Date Application Valid: 24/08/2011 1. SUMMARY Planning permission is sought for the continued use of land at Pylon Farm as an organic composting site for a further temporary period of 12 months. Composting is a form of industrial use which is not normally considered appropriate in a Green Belt location. However, as Council policy aims to increase green waste recycling in line with the Government's Waste Strategy, it is considered that there are special circumstances to justify the continued use at this location, to the extent that the harm on the openness of the Green Belt has been outweighed. Therefore, even though the application is contrary to Saved Policy OL1 of the UDP, approval is recommended. The activities would not be visually intrusive, increase the built up nature of the site, or harm the openness of the area, while the proposal is considered acceptable on highway safety grounds. Therefore approval is recommended. 2. RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL subject to the following: 1 NONSC Non Standard Condition The use hereby permitted shall be discontinued and the land restored to its former condition on or before one year from the date of this permission, in accordance with a scheme of work submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference: FER0848129 1
    Reference: FER0848129 Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) Decision notice Date: 6 January 2020 Public Authority: High Speed 2 Limited Address: 1 Canada Square London E14 5AB Decision (including any steps ordered) 1. The complainant has requested risk assessments from High Speed 2 Limited (HS2). HS2 withheld the requested information under regulation 12(4)(d) of the EIR (material still in the course of completion) and said that the public interest favoured maintaining this exception. 2. The Commissioner’s decision is as follows: HS2 correctly withheld the requested information under regulation 12(4)(d) and the public interest favoured maintaining this exception. HS2 breached regulation 14(2) as it did not refuse the request within the required timescale. 3. The Commissioner does not require HS2 to take any remedial steps. Request and response 4. On 21 January 2019 the complainant wrote to HS2 and requested information in the following terms: “…What risk assessments have taken place, of the potential increased risk to controlled waters as a result of imminent works by HS2 1 Reference: FER0848129 contractors along the Newyears Green bourne and surrounding wetland? Are any of the risk assessments independent from the developers (HS2) and where are the risk assessment accessible to the public?” 5. HS2 responded on 22 March 2019. It withheld the requested information under regulation 12(4)(d) of the EIR and said the public interest favoured maintaining this exception. 6. The complainant requested an internal review on 17 May 2019 and HS2 provided one on 28 May 2019. It upheld its original position. Scope of the case 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 | South Ruislip to Ickenham HS2 London-West Midlands May 2013
    PHASE ONE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Community Forum Area Report 6 | South Ruislip to Ickenham HS2 London-West Midlands May 2013 ENGINE FOR GROWTH DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Community Forum Area Report ENGINE FOR GROWTH 6 I South Ruislip to Ickenham High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2nd Floor, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk © Crown copyright, 2013, except where otherwise stated Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. To order further copies contact: DfT Publications Tel: 0300 123 1102 Web: www.dft.gov.uk/orderingpublications Product code: ES/25 Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre. CFA Report – South Ruislip to Ickenham/No 6 I Contents Contents Draft Volume 2: Community Forum Area Report – South Ruislip to Ickenham/No 6 5 Part A: Introduction 6 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Introduction to HS2 7 1.2 Purpose of this report 7 1.3 Structure of this report 9 Part B: South
    [Show full text]
  • 4195 11 February 2021
    Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Applications and Decisions Publication Number: 4195 Publication Date: 11/02/2021 Objection Deadline Date: 04/03/2021 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 11/02/2021 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] PLEASE NOTE THE PUBLIC COUNTER IS CLOSED AND TELEPHONE CALLS WILL NO LONGER BE TAKEN AT HILLCREST HOUSE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE The Office of the Traffic Commissioner is currently running an adapted service as all staff are currently working from home in line with Government guidance on Coronavirus (COVID-19). Most correspondence from the Office of the Traffic Commissioner will now be sent to you by email. There will be a reduction and possible delays on correspondence sent by post. The best way to reach us at the moment is digitally. Please upload documents through your VOL user account or email us. There may be delays if you send correspondence to us by post. At the moment we cannot be reached by phone. If you wish to make an objection to an application it is recommended you send the details to [email protected].
    [Show full text]