Preliminary Comparison of Soils Within Gale Crater to Those from Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Comparison of Soils Within Gale Crater to Those from Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016) 2477.pdf PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF SOILS WITHIN GALE CRATER TO THOSE FROM GUSEV CRATER AND MERIDIANI PLANUM. C. D. O’Connell-Cooper1, L.M. Thompson1, J.G. Spray1, J.A. Berger2, E.D. Desouza3, M. Schmidt4, A. Yen5, N.I. Boyd3, R. Gellert3, G. Perrett6, S.J. VanBommel3, and the MSL-APXS Team. 1Planetary & Space Science Centre, University New Brunswick, 2 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, NB, E3A 3B5, Canada, [email protected], 2 Western Univ., London, ON, 3Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, 4Brock Univ., St., Catherines, ON, 5JPL-Caltech, 6Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY. Introduction: APXS instrumentation has been variation, and divergence from Portage. FeO, P2O5, used to analyze soils at three separate Martian TiO2, Cr2O3, MnO and Zn are notably depleted, locations: 1. Meridiani Planum (Opportunity, MER); 2. relative to Portage. Gusev Crater (Spirit, MER); 3. Gale Crater (Curiosity, As expected, the Gale soils (red) show the MSL). Previous research has indicated that soils at strongest similarity to Portage. The majority of lighter Gusev and Meridiani are similar in composition and elements, including Na, Al, Si and Ca, as well as Br, may represent a global unit [1]. Comparison to Gale are tightly constrained, showing little variability, soils can further our understanding of the origin and whilst Mg shows some variation. In contrast, S, Cl and evolution of this unit. Whilst a more complete cross K are considerably depleted or elevated, relative to calibration between the three APXS instruments will Portage. Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni and Zn also show variation, require more data from Curiosity, it is possible to although not as pronounced. 2.50 compare soils from the three locations. The MER Meridiani Ratio to Portage Gusev datasets (undisturbed, “dark” soils, max. grain size 100 2.00 Gale μm [1]) used here comprise 6 samples from Meridiani Planum [2, 3] and 24 samples from Gusev Crater [2, 1.50 3]. Gale Crater (undisturbed) soil samples are divided 1.00 into two categories here: Gale Soil (n=10, the main grouping (including Portage, which is regarded as 0.50 being representative of Average Gale, and is used here 0.00 to ratio abundances for ease of comparison) and Na2O MgO Al2O3 SiO2 P2O5 SO3 Cl K2O CaO TiO2 Cr2O3 MnO FeO Ni Zn Br Bagnold Dunes Soils (from the ongoing Bagnold Fig. 2. Average chemical compositions of samples Dunes Campaign). (Individual Bagnold Dunes samples from Meridiani Planum, Gusev Crater, and Gale BD denoted by ; av=average). Crater, ratioed to Portage. Comparison of soils analyzed by APXS – major elements and Ni, Zn and Br: The ratio of soil Fig. 2 plots the average undisturbed soil analyses from Gale soils and from the basaltic soils at composition (Table 1) for a given category, ratioed to Meridiani and Gusev to Portage (Fig. 1) indicate that Portage. Si, Al and Ca abundances for each soil are soils from all three locations have similar compositions tightly constrained, with little range (Fig. 1, 2; Table with minor differences, e.g., Ni and Br. 1). Si abundances are similar for Gusev and Meridiani, 2.50 Gale Crater Ratio to Portage Gusev Crater but are lower and more varied at Gale. The highest Meridiani Planum 2.00 Al2O3 is seen in the Gusev soils, whilst the Meridiani samples are more similar to the Gale soils (av. 9.12 wt. 1.50 %). Conversely, the Gusev soils have the lowest CaO and FeO contents (Fig. 1, 2). MgO abundances for 1.00 Gale and Gusev soils are similar; Meridiani concentrations are lower. 0.50 K, S and Cl show considerable variation, relative to Portage, in all categories (Fig. 1). Within the Gale 0.00 Na2O MgO Al2O3 SiO2 P2O5 SO3 Cl K2O CaO TiO2 Cr2O3 MnO FeO Ni Zn Br soils, values show two distinct groupings – the bulk of Fig. 1. All analyses ratioed to Portage, showing the the samples (incl. Portage) cluster together, close to variability within an individual category and across averages for Meridiani and Gusev, whilst the second categories, relative to Portage (i.e., Average Gale). cluster (n=3) shows relatively high values for K, S and Cl. The largest range in values for Cl, S and K are seen It can be seen that samples from Meridiani Planum at Gusev; however, the high-value Gale cluster (blue) are less varied than Gale and Gusev (due in part comprises the highest Cl soil values seen on Mars so to the smaller data set). However, the majority of far (av. 0.98 wt. %). elemental concentrations are also typically lower or Portage is elevated in TiO2, P2O5 and Cr2O3, all of similar to those for Portage. Gusev (green) (at n=24, which show variation across the three soil categories. the largest sampling) exhibit the greatest compositonal 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016) 2477.pdf Cr2O3 abundances within Gusev and Meridiani Soils Ni, Zn and Br are among the most variable have a fairly consistent profile. However, values within elements at Bagnold Dunes, as quantified by APXS, the Gale Soils are typically higher than those for and appear to be depleted, relative to the other soil Meridiani or Gusev. TiO2 values for Gale and samples (Fig. 1). Whilst typical Bagnold Dunes Ni Meridiani Soils are generally higher than Gusev soils. values range from 490 to 511 ppm, WarsawBD has the Ni, Zn and Br show the highest degree of variation highest Ni (822 ppm) seen in any of the Martian soils. for each category. Ni and Zn values for Gale are higher Zr abundances are lower than those seen within the BD than those seen at Meridiani, which are lower than Gale soils - Barby 191 ppm is the lowest Zn value those from Gusev. Br abundances for the Gale soils are seen within Gale. Br values for the Bagnold Dunes samples are typically low (range 20-60 ppm); however, typically intermediate between those seen at Meridiani BD and Gusev soils. Br values show the most variation the Barby samples have higher Br abundance (103 ppm) than any other soil seen at Gale Crater. (Fig. 1) when ratioed to Portage (34 ppm), with highest 3.50 Gale Soils Ratio to Portage values seen at Gusev (range from 0 to 263 ppm). BarbyBD – crest 3.00 KibnasBD – trough WeissrandBD – disturbed WarsawBD - undisturbed Gale (n=10) Meridiani (n=6) Gusev (n=24) 2.50 Ave. 1σ Ave. 1σ Ave. 1σ Oxide wt% 2.00 SiO2 43.15 0.47 46.15 0.95 46.16 0.78 TiO2 0.99 0.20 0.96 0.07 0.82 0.09 1.50 Al2O3 9.12 0.23 9.37 0.40 10.08 0.40 FeO 19.31 1.11 18.03 1.05 16.07 0.44 1.00 MnO 0.41 0.03 0.38 0.03 0.32 0.02 MgO 8.51 0.36 7.51 0.19 8.73 0.64 0.50 K2O 0.53 0.11 0.49 0.03 0.53 0.20 CaO 7.07 0.10 7.13 0.37 6.34 0.26 0.00 Na O MgO Al O SiO P O SO Cl K O CaO TiO Cr O MnO FeO Ni Zn Br Na2O 2.67 0.20 2.24 0.22 2.95 0.31 2 2 3 2 2 5 3 2 2 2 3 Cr2O3 0.45 0.07 0.40 0.06 0.38 0.12 Fig. 3: Comparison between Gale Soils and Bagnold P2O5 0.83 0.30 0.86 0.04 0.83 0.16 Dunes samples, ratioed to Portage. SO3 5.93 0.83 5.70 1.20 6.12 1.16 Cl 0.80 0.14 0.69 0.10 0.70 0.15 Ni (ppm) 531 76 415 66 527 168 Zn (ppm) 356 110 283 88 272 93 Conclusion: Gale soils (excl. Bagnold Dunes), Br (ppm) 39 20 29 4 46 52 and the basaltic soils at Gusev Crater and Meridiani Table 1. Averages for Gale (excl. Bagnold Dunes), Planum (Fig. 1, 2; Table 1) show consistency in Meridiani [1, 2] and Gusev [1, 2]. composition within limits, indicating a homogenous source and/or a homogenizing process (such as eolian Comparison to Bagnold Dunes: The first soil mixing). More significant differences in soil chemistry analysis from the Bagnold Dunes campaign was taken can be seen at Bagnold Dunes, both between the Gale on Sol 1182. Soil analyses from this ongoing campaign soils and those at Bagnold Dunes (Fig. 3) - the show considerable differences, both to previous Bagnold Dunes samples are more enriched in lighter analyses at Gale Crater and earlier MER analyses, and elements, (e.g., Si and Mg), but lower in K, P, and Ca, between individual Bagnold Dunes samples (Fig. 3). and depleted in volatiles (Ni, Zn and Br) – and Bagnold Dunes samples are higher in SiO2 than the between individual Bagnold Dunes soils. Gale soils, but typically lower than Gusev or As the Bagnold Dunes are an active dune system, Meridiani; however, BarbyBD has the second highest this variability may be related to position and BD SiO2 (48.11 wt. %) seen thus far in Martian soils. associated sorting, e.g., Barby , which is on the crest Although Al2O3 abundances are tightly constrained for of a ripple, displays more extreme variation from the other categories, the Bagnold Dunes values range from norm (i.e., Portage) than does the corresponding trough some of the lowest values seen for Martian soils (e.g., sample, KibnasBD (Fig. 3). The variability may also WarsawBD 8.46 wt. %), to samples higher than those suggest a limited contribution from eroded local seen in the Gale Soils (e.g., BarbyBD 10.87 wt.
Recommended publications
  • Columbus Crater HLS2 Hangout: Exploration Zone Briefing
    Columbus Crater HLS2 Hangout: Exploration Zone Briefing Kennda Lynch1,2, Angela Dapremont2, Lauren Kimbrough2, Alex Sessa2, and James Wray2 1Lunar and Planetary Institute/Universities Space Research Association 2Georgia Institute of Technology Columbus Crater: An Overview • Groundwater-fed paleolake located in northwest region of Terra Sirenum • ~110 km in diameter • Diversity of Noachian & Hesperian aged deposits and outcrops • High diversity of aqueous mineral deposits • Estimated 1.5 km depth of sedimentary and/or volcanic infill • High Habitability and Biosignature Preservation Potential LZ & Field Station Latitude: 194.0194 E Longitude: 29.2058 S Altitude: +910 m SROI #1 RROI #1 LZ/HZ SROI #4 SROI #2 SROI #5 22 KM HiRISE Digital Terrain Model (DTM) • HiRISE DTMs are made from two images of the same area on the ground, taken from different look angles (known as a stereo-pair) • DTM’s are powerful research tools that allow researchers to take terrain measurements and model geological processes • For our traversability analysis of Columbus: • The HiRISE DTM was processed and completed by the University of Arizona HiRISE Operations Center. • DTM data were imported into ArcMap 10.5 software and traverses were acquired and analyzed using the 3D analyst tool. • A slope map was created in ArcMap to assess slope values along traverses as a supplement to topography observations. Slope should be ≤30°to meet human mission requirements. Conclusions Traversability • 9 out of the 17 traverses analyzed met the slope criteria for human missions. • This region of Columbus Crater is traversable and allows access to regions of astrobiological interest. It is also a possible access point to other regions of Terra Sirenum.
    [Show full text]
  • Peculiarities of the Chemical Abundance Distribution in Galaxies NGC 3963 and NGC 7292
    MNRAS 505, 2009–2019 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1414 Advance Access publication 2021 May 19 Peculiarities of the chemical abundance distribution in galaxies NGC 3963 and NGC 7292 A. S. Gusev ‹ and A. V. Dodin Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Universitetsky pr. 13, 119234 Moscow, Russia Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/505/2/2009/6278202 by Lomonosov Moscow State University user on 09 June 2021 Accepted 2021 May 11. in original form 2021 April 27 ABSTRACT Spectroscopic observations of 32 H II regions in the spiral galaxy NGC 3963 and the barred irregular galaxy NGC 7292 were carried out with the 2.5-m telescope of the Caucasus Mountain Observatory of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute using the Transient Double-beam Spectrograph with a dispersion of ≈1Åpixel−1 and a spectral resolution of ≈3 Å. These observations were used to estimate the oxygen and nitrogen abundances and the electron temperatures in H II regions through modern strong- line methods. In general, the galaxies have oxygen and nitrogen abundances typical of stellar systems with similar luminosities, sizes, and morphology. However, we have found some peculiarities in chemical abundance distributions in both galaxies. The distorted outer segment of the southern arm of NGC 3963 shows an excess oxygen and nitrogen abundances. Chemical elements abundances in NGC 7292 are constant and do not depend on the galactocentric distance. These peculiarities can be explained in terms of external gas accretion in the case of NGC 3963 and major merging for NGC 7292. Key words: ISM: abundances – H II regions – galaxies: abundances – galaxies: individual: NGC 3963, NGC 7292.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy of the Martian Surface
    EA42CH14-Ehlmann ARI 30 April 2014 7:21 Mineralogy of the Martian Surface Bethany L. Ehlmann1,2 and Christopher S. Edwards1 1Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125; email: [email protected], [email protected] 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109 Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2014. 42:291–315 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on Mars, composition, mineralogy, infrared spectroscopy, igneous processes, February 21, 2014 aqueous alteration The Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences is online at earth.annualreviews.org Abstract This article’s doi: The past fifteen years of orbital infrared spectroscopy and in situ exploration 10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-055024 have led to a new understanding of the composition and history of Mars. Copyright c 2014 by Annual Reviews. Globally, Mars has a basaltic upper crust with regionally variable quanti- by California Institute of Technology on 06/09/14. For personal use only. All rights reserved ties of plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine associated with distinctive terrains. Enrichments in olivine (>20%) are found around the largest basins and Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2014.42:291-315. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org within late Noachian–early Hesperian lavas. Alkali volcanics are also locally present, pointing to regional differences in igneous processes. Many ma- terials from ancient Mars bear the mineralogic fingerprints of interaction with water. Clay minerals, found in exposures of Noachian crust across the globe, preserve widespread evidence for early weathering, hydrothermal, and diagenetic aqueous environments. Noachian and Hesperian sediments include paleolake deposits with clays, carbonates, sulfates, and chlorides that are more localized in extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Habitability of hydrothermal systems at Jezero and Gusev Craters as constrained by hydrothermal alteration of a terrestrial mafic dike Journal Item How to cite: Costello, Lacey J.; Filiberto, Justin; Crandall, Jake R.; Potter-McIntyre, Sally L.; Schwenzer, Susanne P.; Miller, Michael A.; Hummer, Daniel R.; Olsson-Francis, Karen and Perl, Scott (2020). Habitability of hydrothermal systems at Jezero and Gusev Craters as constrained by hydrothermal alteration of a terrestrial mafic dike. Geochemistry (Early access). For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2020.125613 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Geochemistry xxx (xxxx) xxxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemer Habitability of hydrothermal systems at Jezero and Gusev Craters as constrained by hydrothermal alteration of a terrestrial mafic dike Lacey J. Costelloa,1, Justin Filibertob,*, Jake R. Crandallc, Sally L. Potter-McIntyrea, Susanne P. Schwenzerd, Michael A. Millere, Daniel R. Hummera, Karen Olsson-Francisd, Scott Perlf a
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Mars As a Planet, Possible Life on Mars
    EVOLUTION OF MARS LECTURE 18 NEEP 533 HARRISON H. SCHMITT NASA HST IMAGE N THARSIS HELLAS S ANDESITE OR WEATHERED SOIL DUST DUST DUST BASALT ~100 KM A C B THEMIS THERMAL IMAGING OF SPIRIT LANDING AREA IN GUSEV CRATER A. SPIRIT LANDING ELLIPSE B. CLOSER VIEW OF SPIRIT LANDING ELLIPSE C. NIGHT IR IMAGE: BRIGHT AREAS ARE MORE ROCKY. ARROW POINTS TO ROCKY SLOPE SPIRIT MOVED TO GUSEV CRATER POSSIBLE LAKE BED IN LARGE BASIN A C B THEMIS THERMAL IMAGING OF OPPORTUNITYLANDING AREA IN MERIDIANI PLANUM A. LANDING ELLIPSE ~120 KM LONG) B. CLOSER VIEW OF LANDING ELLIPSE C. NIGHT IR IMAGE: BRIGHT AREAS ARE MORE ROCKY. ARROW POINTS TO ROCKY SLOPE MAJOR STAGES OF MARS’ EVOLUTION 1 BEGINNING 2 MAGMA OCEAN / CONVECTIVE OVERTURN 3A ? ? CRATERED UPLANDS / VERY LARGE BASINS 3B ? CORE FORMATION/GLOBAL MAGNETIC FIELD 3C 4.5 - 1.3 GLOBAL MAFIC VOLCANISM DENSE WATER / CO2 ATMOSPHERE E ? G 3D EROSION / LAKES / NORTHERN OCEAN A T ? ? S 4 LARGE BASINS CATACLYSM ? THARSIS UPLIFT AND VOLCANISM ? 5 NORTHERN HEMISPHERE BASALTIC / ANDESITIC VOLCANISM ? 1.3 - 0.2 SUBSURFACE HYDROSPHERE / CRYOSPHERE 6 ? PRESENT SURFACE CONDITIONS LUNAR 4.6 4.2? 3.8 ? 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 BILLIONS OF YEARS BEFORE PRESENT ITALICS = SNC DATES RED = MAJOR UNCERTAINTY OLYMPUS TOPOGRAPHY OF MONS THARSIS REGION VALLES MARINERIS THARSIS REGION SHADED RELIEF DETAIL MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR MOLA OLYMPUS MONS VALLES MARINERIS APOLLO MODEL OF MARS EVOLUTION ELYSIUM MONS ANDESITIC THARSIS EVENTS EXTRUSIONS <3.8 B.Y. THARSIS THICKENING ATMOSPHERE: MAFIC UPPER MANTLE WITH CO2, H20 CRYOSPHERE / INCREASING HYDROSPHERE SI AND FE UPWARDS OLIVINE/ NA- PYROXENE ? ANDESITIC CUMULATE INTRUSIONS? OLIVINE ? CUMULATE RELIC PROTO- GARNET / NA-CPX/ CORE ? NA-BIOTITE?/NA- HORNBLENDE/ ? FExNIySz “RUTILE” (TRANSITION? CORE CUMULATES ? ZONE) RELIC MAGNETIC STRIPING THICKENED SOUTHERN ©Harrison H.
    [Show full text]
  • Are We Martians? Looking for Indicators of Past Life on Mars with the Missions of the European Space Agency
    CESAR Scientific Challenge Are we Martians? Looking for indicators of past life on Mars with the missions of the European Space Agency Teacher's Guide 1 Are we Martians? CESAR Scientific Challenge Table of contents: Didactics 5 Phase 0 18 Phase 1 20 Activity 1: Refresh concepts 21 Activity 2: Getting familiar with coordinates 21 Activity 2.1: Identify coordinates on an Earth map 21 Activity 2.2: The Martian zero meridian 24 Activity 2.3: Identify coordinates on a Martian map 25 Activity 2.4: A model of Mars 27 Activity 3: The origin of life 28 Activity 3.1: What is life? 28 Activity 3.2: Traces of extraterrestrial life 29 Activity 3.2.1: Read the following article 30 Activity 3.2.2: Read about Rosalind Franklin and ExoMars 2022 30 Activity 3.3: Experiment for DNA extraction 31 Activity 4: Habitable zones 31 Activity 4.1: Habitable zone of our star 31 Activity 4.2: Study the habitable zones of different stars 34 Activity 4.3: Past, present and future of water on Mars 37 Activity 4.4: Extremophiles 39 Activity 5: What do you know about Mars? 40 Activity 6: Scientific knowledge from Mars’ surface 41 Activity 6.1: Geology of Mars 41 Activity 6.2: Atmosphere of Mars 44 Activity 7: Mars exploration by European Space Agency 45 Activity 7.1: Major Milestones of the European Space Agency on Mars 50 Activity 8: Check what you have learnt so far 52 2 Are we Martians? CESAR Scientific Challenge Phase 2 53 Activity 9: Ask for a videocall with the CESAR Team if needed 54 Phase 3 56 Activity 10: Prepare the Mars landing 57 Activity 10.1: Get used to Google Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Mapping of Gusev Crater, Mars: Gusev Rim and Floor Characteristics
    Planetary Geologic Mappers 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2610) 7020.pdf GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF GUSEV CRATER, MARS: GUSEV RIM AND FLOOR CHARACTERISTICS. David A. Crown1, Frank C. Chuang1, James W. Rice1, Steven W. Ruff2, and Stephen P. Scheidt1,3,4, 1Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Ft. Lowell Rd., Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719 ([email protected]), 2Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, 3Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, 4Center for Research & Exploration in Space Science and Technology, Greenbelt, MD 20771. Introduction: The geologic complexity of Gusev the crater floor. crater (~160 km diameter; 14.53°S, 175.52°E) and its Gusev Crater Floor: Gusev floor materials have surroundings have been revealed through orbital been attributed to aeolian deposits overlying lava flows remote sensing coupled with in situ exploration of the [11]; mass-wasting and channel deposits [12]; fluvio- Columbia Hills and adjacent volcanic plains by the lacustrine deposits [6-7]; and basaltic lava flows [8, MER Spirit rover [e.g., 1-4]. Gusev crater’s geologic 13-15]. Although Spirit confirmed the presence of history has been attributed to the combined effects of a basalt, questions remain regarding the overall geologic variety of geologic processes that span much of evolution of Gusev. Martian history. We have initiated a new geologic Figure 1 shows our preliminary geologic map of mapping investigation of Gusev crater, designed to Gusev floor materials. Using 5-6 m/pixel CTX images, produce a 1:250K-scale, formal geologic map focused we have identified eight geologic units, including: two on the geologic evolution of the Gusev rim and floor ridged volcanic plains, Ma’adim debris flow, dissected (Figures 1-3).
    [Show full text]
  • Olivine-Carbonate Mineralogy of Jezero Crater
    Olivine-Carbonate Mineralogy of Jezero Crater A. J. Brown1, C. E. Viviano2, and T. A. Goudge3 1Plancius Research, 1106 Bellevista Ct, Severna Park, MD 21146. 2Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, MD. 3Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, TX. Corresponding author: Adrian Brown (adrian.j.brown@ n a sa.gov) Key Points: We describe a correlation between carbonates of Jezero crater and Nili Fossae and the accompanying olivine lithology We identify three olivine lithologies and determine variation in Mg-Fe chemistry. Carbonates occur in relatively Fe-rich olivine-lithologies We show a formation model for Jezero that accounts for the observations. We discuss how formation mechanisms address the new observations Abstract A well-preserved, ancient delta deposit, in combination with ample exposures of Mg-carbonate rich materials, make Jezero Crater in Nili Fossae a compelling astrobiological site and a top candidate for future landed missions to Mars. We use CRISM observations to characterize the surface mineralogy of the crater and surrounding watershed. We have identified a three- endmember sequence of olivine-bearing lithologies that we hypothesize are distinguished by their Mg content. We find that Mg-carbonates are consistently identified in association with one of the olivine-bearing lithologies, although that lithology is not fully carbonatized. Surprisingly, this lithology contains relatively Fe-rich olivine. We address a range of formation scenarios, including the possibility that these olivine and carbonate associations are indicators of serpentinization on early Mars. These deposits provide an opportunity for deepening our understanding of early Mars by revealing the thermal history of the martian interior and potentially changes in its tectonic regime with time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landing Site for Human Missions to Mars in Gusev Crater. A. Z. Longo1, 1Cardinal Gibbons High School (417 Tharps Lane, Raleigh, NC 27614; [email protected])
    First Landing Site/Exploration Zone Workshop for Human Missions to the Surface of Mars (2015) 1008.pdf A Landing Site for Human Missions to Mars in Gusev Crater. A. Z. Longo1, 1Cardinal Gibbons High School (417 Tharps Lane, Raleigh, NC 27614; [email protected]). Introduction: I propose Gusev Crater, the landing site for the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) Spirit, as the location for one of the first crewed missions to Mars in the 2030s. Gusev Crater is a 166-kilometer wide impact basin, named after Russian astronomer Matvey Gusev (1826-1866). The crater is located in the southern highlands of Mars, at 14.5o S, 175.4o E. Current analyses suggest that it formed approximately 4.0-3.8 billion years ago during the Noachian era of the planet’s history. Many different mineral phases and landforms detected in orbital imagery suggest multiple episodes of past fluvial activity. Our current knowledge of the crater consists of data collected from orbital missions [1] since the 1970s and “ground truth” from the Spirit rover. Spirit landed on January 3, 2004 on the floor of the crater. After initial analysis discov- Science Targets: The ellipse contains a land-on, ered basaltic rocks, the rover drove to the Columbia datable volcanic surface, which is a Hesperian ridged Hills, a complex of ~200-foot-tall, heavily eroded plain [3]. The Columbia Hills are located only 2.5 kipukas where it spent the rest of the mission [2]. Af- kilometers from the center of the landing ellipse. The ter discoveries of water-altered rocks dating from the Columbia Hills science targets are located in a remark- Noachian through to the geologically recent past, Spirit ably compact, 3 by 5 kilometer region of interest and succumbed to the cold of the Martian winter in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbialites at Gusev Crater, Mars
    obiolog str y & f A O u o l t a r e n a r c u h o J Bianciardi, et al., Astrobiol Outreach 2015, 3:5 Journal of Astrobiology & Outreach DOI: 10.4172/2332-2519.1000143 ISSN: 2332-2519 Research Article Open Access Microbialites at Gusev Crater, Mars. Giorgio Bianciardi1,2*, Vincenzo Rizzo2, Maria Eugenia Farias3 and Nicola Cantasano4 1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy 2National Research Council-retired, Via Repaci 22, Rende, Cosenza, Italy 3Laboratorio de Investigaciones Microbiológicas de Lagunas Andinas (LIMLA), Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (PROIMI), CCT, CONICET, Tucumán, Argentina 4National Research Council, Institute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean, Rende Research Unit, Cosenza, Italy *Corresponding author: Giorgio Bianciardi, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy, Tel: +39 348 2650891; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: September 28, 2015; Acc date: October 31, 2015; Pub date: November 3, 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Giorgio Bianciardi, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The Mars Exploration Rover Spirit investigated plains at Gusev crater, where sedimentary rocks are present. The Spirit rover’s Athena morphological investigation shows microstructures organized in intertwined filaments of microspherules: a texture we have also found on samples of terrestrial stromatolites and other microbialites. We performed a quantitative image analysis to compare 45 microbialites samplings with 50 rover’s ones (approximately 25,000/20,000 microstructures).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Insight Landing Site on Mars ✉ M
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14679-1 OPEN Geology of the InSight landing site on Mars ✉ M. Golombek 1 , N.H. Warner 2, J.A. Grant 3, E. Hauber 4, V. Ansan 5, C.M. Weitz 6, N. Williams 1, C. Charalambous 7, S.A. Wilson 3, A. DeMott2, M. Kopp 2, H. Lethcoe-Wilson1, L. Berger1, R. Hausmann1, E. Marteau1, C. Vrettos 8, A. Trussell1, W. Folkner1, S. Le Maistre9, N. Mueller 4, M. Grott 4, T. Spohn 4, S. Piqueux1, E. Millour 10, F. Forget 10, I. Daubar 1, N. Murdoch 11, P. Lognonné 12, C. Perrin 12, S. Rodriguez 12, W.T. Pike7, T. Parker1, J. Maki 1, H. Abarca1, R. Deen1, J. Hall1, P. Andres1, N. Ruoff1, F. Calef1, S. Smrekar 1, M.M. Baker3,13, M. Banks14, A. Spiga 10,15, D. Banfield 16, J. Garvin 14, C.E. Newman17 & W.B. Banerdt1 1234567890():,; The Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport (InSight) spacecraft landed successfully on Mars and imaged the surface to characterize the surficial geology. Here we report on the geology and subsurface structure of the landing site to aid in situ geophysical investigations. InSight landed in a degraded impact crater in Elysium Planitia on a smooth sandy, granule- and pebble-rich surface with few rocks. Superposed impact craters are common and eolian bedforms are sparse. During landing, pulsed retro- rockets modified the surface to reveal a near surface stratigraphy of surficial dust, over thin unconsolidated sand, underlain by a variable thickness duricrust, with poorly sorted, unconsolidated sand with rocks beneath.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Hills, Gusev Crater: Mission Overview and Selected Results from the Cumberland Ridge to Home Plate, J
    Columbia Hills, Location 14.5478 S, 175.6255 E (lat,lon): MOLA128: -1.932 km Gusev Crater Summary of observations and interpreted history, including unknowns: Gusev crater formed around 3.9–4.1 billion years ago (Werner et al., 2008). The Columbia Hills may represent peak ring hills, intersecting rims of multiple craters, or eroded, possibly lacustrine fill. Subsequent geologic processes emplaced successive volcanics and possibly evaporites, draping over the Hills at dips of 7–30 degrees (McSween et al., 2008; McCoy et al., 2008; Ruff et al., 2014). Basaltic plains dated to 3.65 Ga onlap the Columbia Hills (Greeley et al., 2005). Multiple igneous rock units are present in the Columbia Hills, including high-alkali and high olivine materials and some tuffs or ashes (McSween et al., 2008). Several types of evidence of aqueous processes are preserved in rocks that have possible Al-phyllosilicates (Clark et al., 2007), Mg-Fe carbonates (Morris et al., 2010), and opaline silica (Squyres et al., 2008; Ruff et al., 2011). Near surface soil crusts have ferric sulfates, calcium sulfates, and silica (Arvidson et al., 2010). The silica-enriched rocks and ferric sulfate-bearing soils occur in and around the 80 m-diameter “Home Plate” volcaniclastic deposit. The presence of the Spirit rover represents a long duration exposure facility experiment, of potential value in human exploration. Key units are: the "Comanche" carbonate-bearing outcrops (~15-30 wt% Mg-Fe carbonate, plus olivine and an amorphous silicate), which has been interpreted to result from (a) hydrothermal alteration (Morris et al., 2010) or (b) evaporation of an ephemeral lake (Ruff et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]