Barbara Drake Boehm, Jiri Fajt, eds.. , the Crown of Bohemia, 1347-1437. Metropolitan Museum of Art Series. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005. Illustrations. xiii + 366 pp. $65.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-300-11138-5.

Reviewed by James Palmitessa

Published on H-German (November, 2007)

In the foreword to Prague the Crown of Bo‐ essays written by an international team of ten hemia 1347-1437, Philippe de Montebello, director scholars makes up the frst half of the book; the of New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art, notes catalogue entries by an expanded group of forty that "[s]ince the Velvet Revolution, not only chron‐ make up the second half. Together they make this iclers and poets but throngs of tourists fock to volume a scholarly tour-de-force that fulflls the Prague, to see its imposing castle, its soaring task Montebello sets. cathedral and mighty bridge. Still, many do not re‐ In the frst essay, an excellent introduction to alize how much of the city's fairytale skyline and the rest of the volume, Fajt describes Charles's how many of its treasures were created after family background and the formative years that Charles IV established his new European capital infuenced his art patronage. Born in 1316, the on the banks of the Vltava (Moldau)" (p. vi). The son of John of Luxembourg and Elizabeth of the book is a companion volume to a landmark exhi‐ Bohemian royal house of P?emyslid, the future bition held in Prague and New York in 2005-6, co- King of Bohemia and Holy Roman Emperor was organized with the Administration baptized under the name Wenceslas (Václav). At and curated by Barbara Drake Boehm of the mu‐ the age of seven he was sent to the French court seum and Ji?i Fajt, project director at the Geis‐ and changed his name to Charles in honor of his teswissenschaftliches Zentrum Geschichte und sponsor. Fajt writes that he was reared there in an Kultur Ostmitteleuropas in Leipzig. The exquisite, atmosphere of ceremonial piety, participating in large-format book includes hundreds of high- events at Sainte-Chapelle and St. Denis. "Perhaps quality photographs of paintings, drawings, sculp‐ [St. Denis's] famous treasury awakened his inter‐ ture, architecture, glasswork, textiles, and illumi‐ est in the classical and Byzantine past, which may nated books. Dozens of institutions and individu‐ help explain aspects of his [later] donations" (p. als in the , , , the Vati‐ 4). In 1330, Charles was sent to northern Italy to can, Sweden, the United States, and nine other protect Luxembourg holdings, where he became countries contributed to the exhibition. A series of H-Net Reviews acquainted with its sophisticated art and urban gion the kind of Franco-Flemish nature study culture. After returning home, even before his fa‐ without which the further development of paint‐ ther turned over Bohemia to him in 1342, Charles ing at the imperial court and the birth of the por‐ expanded and renovated the royal castle, linking trait in central Europe are unthinkable" (p. 11). it to the adjacent All Saints Chapel, borrowing Around 1360, Master Theodoric decorated the from the example of Sainte-Chapelle. In 1344, Holy Cross Chapel with 130 panel paintings of Charles's former tutor, who had since become saints; holy relics were placed in the painting Pope Clement VI, elevated Prague to an archdio‐ frames and in a special niche of a wall. According cese, and Charles entrusted the construction of to Fajt, the newly decorated chapel, reminiscent the new St. Vitus Cathedral to French builder of lavishly decorated palaces of the Byzantine em‐ Matthias of Arras. After his royal coronation in peror in Constantinople, the papal chapel of Sanc‐ 1347, Charles IV took steps to solidify Bohemia's ta Sanctorum in the Lateran Palace in Rome, and position in the Empire; and from then on, accord‐ Sainte-Chapelle in Paris, "equated the idea of the ing to Fajt, "policy decisions were often linked to empire with the church triumphant" (p. 13). his increased activity as a patron, which was con‐ Boehm draws on Charles's writings and those centrated on transforming Prague into a splendid of contemporary chroniclers to examine his faith imperial capital" (p. 7). By the time Charles was and its impact on art patronage. She writes that crowned Holy Roman Emperor in 1355, an "Impe‐ Charles expressed an appreciation for being rial style" began to emerge in the art of the Prague taught to read the hours during his education and court, which formed the basis of the distinctive followed this ritual throughout his life, although Bohemian variation on the unfortunately no trace of any personal book col‐ style, which earlier historians referred lection survives. The most demonstrable aspect of to as "the Beautiful style" (krásný sloh). his spirituality was his devotion to saints and An important role in the development of the their relics. During his last visit to Paris in 1378 he Imperial style was played, according to Fajt, by acquired the relics of Christ's passion used in the Jan of St?eda, the director of Charles's chancellery decoration of the Bohemian crown of Wenceslas, and a well-known Bohemian supporter of Italian which Charles commissioned and was patterned humanism. St?eda provided new direction to after the crowns of both P?emyslid rulers and book illuminating workshops, seen in the Liber vi‐ French royalty. Other relics were donated to St. aticus, which, Fajt argues, displays command of Vitus Cathedral. Boehm comments that Prague's technical and artistic devices in Sienese art and reputation as a repository for relics was sur‐ set the standard for Bohemian manuscripts until passed only by that of Rome. the ffteenth century. In painting, the develop‐ In two later essays, Fajt and Robert Suckale ment of the Imperials can be seen in the renova‐ explore the infuence of Charles IV's political al‐ tion of Karlstejn Castle, a hunting lodge of the liances on art. Within Bohemia, where the nobili‐ Luxembourgs a day's ride from the royal castle ty traditionally enjoyed widespread autonomy, (just as Vincennes was from Paris). During the Charles established close ties with the bishops, years 1356-57, the walls of the castle hall were who helped him gain administrative control of his painted with portraits of Charles's Luxembourg kingdom. He found a loyal ally in Arnošt of Pardu‐ and Brabantine ancestors by an artist identifed bice, the frst Archbishop of Prague. Arnošt com‐ as Charles's frst painter, whom Fajt states was missioned a large number of important artistic probably Nicholas Wurmser from Strasbourg. Fajt projects, including choirbooks, manuscripts, and goes on to comment that "[t]he Master of the Lux‐ stained glass windows in monasteries and hospi‐ embourg genealogy ... brought to the Prague re‐

2 H-Net Reviews tals. Among the few surviving works is a painting that more than seventy goldsmiths were active in of the Virgin and Child located today in Berlin's Prague; as well as numerous illuminators, scribes, Gemäldegalerie. Outside of Bohemia, Charles ar‐ and glass glazers for whom little information is ranged the marriage of his daughter to Casimir of available. She also suggests that while polishers of Cracow. Fajt and Suckale show how the art of Cra‐ semiprecious stones may not have been as nu‐ cow became indebted to Bohemian examples and merous in Prague as in Paris or Venice, Prague how a Bohemian orientation in Polish art contin‐ would have been viewed as an especially attrac‐ ued even after the Jagiellonian dynasty came to tive place to work, thanks to Charles's commis‐ power. The Luxembourgs also sought allies in sions for the intricate stone work at Karlstejn and Salzburg to isolate the Habsburgs and many ex‐ in St. Vitus Cathedral. amples of Bohemian infuence can be found In describing the state of Prague Jewry, Vivian there. On the other hand, however, Luxembourg Mann notes that Jews lived in four diferent areas rivalry with the Bavarian Wittelsbachs did not of the city with the largest settlement around the stop them from borrowing from the art of the Altneuschul, the oldest extant synagogue in Eu‐ Wittelsbach court. rope. She also notes that Jewish property was con‐ Paul Crossley and Zoë Opa?i? provide a su‐ fscated during the reign of John of Luxembourg, perb discussion on the New City as one of largest but when Charles IV came to power he reafrmed urban foundation projects of the Middle Ages. an earlier charter of King Otakar (1254) that They highlight how the layout of streets, squares, granted Jews the right to self-government and of‐ churches, and monasteries in the New City and fered protection to them and their communal the new bridge between the Old and New Cities properties. Charles also awarded Jews their own were designed to complement the existing infra‐ community fag as acknowledgement of their ser‐ structure, to join these two communities and the vice to Prague. settlement around the Castle, both spatially and Boehm and Fajt also discuss the artistic legacy symbolically, into a new unifed city. They place of Charles's IV son and successor, Wenceslas (Vá‐ these developments in a much broader historical clav) IV. They note that while his reign was context than earlier scholarship, noting the shift marked by political and religious turmoil, it also of power from the nearby Vyšehrad Hill to the witnessed the apogee of the "Beautiful Style" as Castle Hill in the ninth century and the work done work continued on the sculptural program of the in the city under John of Luxembourg. "But it was Tower Bridge--which celebrated the political vic‐ Charles," they write, "with his charismatic mix‐ tories of Charles IV, the end of confict with the ture of pragmatism and ideology his talent for Bavarian Wittelsbachs, the acquisition of Bran‐ self-publicity, and sacro-egoismo [who] saw the denburg, and his election as king--with important potential in Prague ... as a dynastic base from relocation and new foundation projects at the uni‐ which to secure the fortune of the Luxembourgs versity. Gerhard Schmidt argues that the term and launch his claim to the imperial throne (pp. "Beautiful Style" is accurate in describing the Bo‐ 59-60). hemian late Gothic in that it was especially cre‐ Boehm paints a profle, as far as the sources ative when it came to iconography; creating the allow, of artistic communities in Prague at the prototypes of what are called "beautiful Madon‐ time of Charles IV. She notes that the painters of nas" and pietàs, characterized by lavishly draped the Old and New Cities of Prague established a cloaks and naked, thrashing infants. Free form brotherhood within a year of Charles's 1347 royal linear design, seen in the portrayal of human hair coronation for which membership records exist;

3 H-Net Reviews or draping of a fabric in an almost calligraphic that during the reign of Charles IV until the Hus‐ form, also characterizes the Beautiful Style. site Revolution, Prague was a major European In a discussion of the Hussite Revolution and artistic and cultural center, just as it was two cen‐ art, Jan Royt eschews discussion of the destruc‐ turies later during the reign of Rudolf II tion of art in iconoclastic revolts and fghting in (1583-1612), a period that has also attracted the at‐ favor of a thoughtful treatment of intellectual dis‐ tention of international scholarship and was the putes over religious art. Royt explains that pre- subject of major exhibits in the 1980s and 1990s. Hussite and Hussite reformers had a diferentiat‐ [1] The book also raises interesting questions ed relationship to religious art. For example, Mat? about artistic regions and the problem of artistic j z Janova considered paintings "dead and lifeless" metropolises that demand closer comparison with things and advocated the removal of paintings to‐ Prague around 1600.[2] Here too, it would seem, wards which undue respect was shown, but fa‐ one can ask about the ways in which an imperial vored the "reasonable use of images in churches" court and the diversity of a medium-sized city for the edifcation of the laity (p. 113). Royt also could serve as catalysts for cultural integration notes that during the Hussite Revolution, in spite not just within central Europe but Europe as a of the loss of contact between major artistic cen‐ whole, which made Prague an incubator of the In‐ ters, artistic production was not altogether dis‐ ternational Gothic, just as it was for the late Re‐ rupted, and many painters and book illuminators naissance. Whether or not such a discussion takes remained active in Prague even during the most place, this work on its own merit will be referred violent years. to in years to come. In the fnal essay, Ern?' Marosi discusses the Notes reign of Sigismund, the last Luxembourg ruler, [1]. Eliška Fu?íková, ed., Prag um 1600. Kunst who occupied the thrones of Bohemia (intermit‐ und Kultur am Hofe Rudolf II., 2 vols. (Freren: tently) and Hungary (1437) and became Holy Ro‐ Luca, 1988); Fu?íková, ed., Rudolf II and Prague: man Emperor (1433). During the period before The Imperial Court and Residential City as Social Sigismund was able to assume the Bohemian and Cultural Heart of Central Europe (London: throne due to Hussite violence, Marosi writes that Thames and Hudson, 1997). he fortifed the imperial residence in Buda and [2]. Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann, Toward a Ge‐ notes examples of Bohemian infuence in Hungar‐ ography of Art (Chicago: University of Chicago ian art of the period. Press, 2004), 154-186. Fajt informs the readers at the beginning of this volume that " venerate Charles as fa‐ ther of their country, but for Germans he was the stepfather of the Holy Roman Empire" (p. 3). One of the book's virtues is its avoidance of the nation‐ alist problematic of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and its search for perspective in the context of the late Middle Ages: in a combination of the public and the private, personal piety, "po‐ litical theology" and "theological politics," and the dynastic struggles between the Luxembourgs, Wittelsbachs, and Habsburgs. The greatest contri‐ bution of this work is that it clearly establishes

4 H-Net Reviews

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-german

Citation: James Palmitessa. Review of Boehm, Barbara Drake; Fajt, Jiri, eds. Prague, the Crown of Bohemia, 1347-1437. H-German, H-Net Reviews. November, 2007.

URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=13926

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

5