DOCSLIB.ORG

Calendar No. 1153

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calendar No. 1153 Calendar No. 1153 93D CONGR'ESSB RE..... 2d Session fSENATE No. 93-1217 DEEPWATER PORT ACT OF 1974 JOINT REPORT OF THE COMMITTEES ON COMMERCE; INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS; AND PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES SENATE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIO-AL VIEWS TO ACC03PANY S. 4706 OCTOBER2, 1974.-Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 39-142 WASHINGTON t 1974 COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE WARREN 0. MAGNUSON, Washington, Chairman JOHN 0. PASTORE, Rhode Island NO RRIS COTTON, New Hampshire VANCE HARTKE, Indiana JAMES B. PEARSON, Kansas PHILIP A. HART, Michigan ROBERT P. GRIFFIN, Michigan HOWARD W. CANNON, Nevada HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., Teaness RUSSELL B. LONG, Lonisiana MARLOW W. COOK, Kentarky FRANK E. MOSS, Utah TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina J. GLENN BEALL, JR., Maryland DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii JOHN V. TUNNEY, California ADLAI E. STEVENSON III, Illinois FREDEsCKJ. LORDAN,StafDirector MICHAELPaRTScUN, Chief Cannel JAES P. WALSH,Staff Connet JOHNF. HOaSEY,Professional SiaffMcniber ARTHURPANxoPr, Jr., Minority Staff Director EARn E. COSTELLO,Minority ProfesionalStaff Metaber COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS HENRY M. JACKSON, Washington, Chaiman ALAN BIBLE, Nevada PAUL J. FANNIN, Arizona FRANK CHURCH, Idaho CLIFFORD P. HANSEN, Wyoming LEE METCALF, Montana MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon J. BENNETT JOHNSTON, JR., Louisiana JAMES L. BUCKLEY, New York JAMES ABOUREZK, South Dakota JAMES A. McCLURE, Idaho FLOYD K. HASKELL, Colorado DEWEY F. BARTLETT, Oklahoma GAYLORD NELSON, Wisconsin HOWARD M. METZENBAUM, Ohio JERRYT. VERKLER,SaffDiretor WI.tao J. VAR NaS, Chie" Canners C. SaZANa REED,Pmofesaional Staff Membr D. MICHAELHARVEY, Spetiat CoUnd HARRISONLOosm, Minoritp Conned ROIA SKEEN,Minority Staff Asiatant (m) III COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS JENNINGS RANDOLPH, West Virginia, Chairman EDMUND S. MUSKIE, Maine HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., Tennessee JOSEPH M. MONTOYA, New Mexico JAMES L. BUCKLEY, New York MIKE GRAVEL, Alaska ROBERT T. STAFFORD, Vermont LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas WILLIAM L. SCOTT, Virginia QUENTIN N. BURDICK, North Dakota JAMES A. McCLURE, Idaho DICK CLARK, Iowa PETE V. DOMENICI, New Meino JOE BIDEN, Delaware M. BARRYMEYER, Chief Counsel and Chief Clerk BAILEy GUAo, Minority Clerk; RICHARDA. HELLMAN,Minoritp Counsel LEON G. BILLINOS,Senior Staff Member pFnLP T. CUMMINGS,Assistant Chief Counse JOHN W. YAGO, JR., Assistant Chief Clerk HAROLDH. BAYMAN, ANN GARRABRANT,WESLEY F. HAYDEN, LARRYMEYERS, SALLYW. WALKER, Professional Saff emer SPECIAL JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEEPWATER PORTS COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE WARREN 0. MAGNUSON, Washington TED STEVENS, Alaska RUSSELL B. LONG, Louisiana J. GLENN BEALL, JR., Maryland ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS HENRY M. JACKSON, Washington CLIFFORD P. HANSEN, Wyoming LEE METCALF, Montana MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon I. BENNETT JOHNSTON, JR., Louisiana COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS MIKE GRAVEL, Alaska JAMES L. BUCKLEY, New York LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas WILLIAM L. SCOTT, Virginia JOE BIDEN, Delaware EXPLANATORY NOTE This is a joint report of the Committees on Commerce, Interior and Insular Affairs, and Public Works. As discussed in Chapter IV the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 is the result of over a year of deliberation by the Senate Special Joint Sub- committee on Deepwater Ports. The Subcommittee consisted of members from each of the three full committees sharing jurisdiction over this issue. By agreement of the respective Chairmen the Deep- water Port Act of 1974 has been reported to the Senate by the three full Committees in the same form as it was reported from the Sub- committee. As discussed in Chapter V, the reported bill is accompanied by amendments that will be separately offered on the floor. Statements of the intent of the reporting Committees throughout this report are subject to the reservations expressed by each full Committee in Chapter V. I CONTENTS Page I. Purpose and description 1 1. Federal coordination - -- 2. Preference ......................... 2 3. State coordination - .......................... --- 2 4. Liability - 3 5. Applicable law - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 4 6. Additional provisions ------------------------------------- 4 7. Procedural requirements. .. .................--- -.-.- 4 II. Background and need ----------------------------------------- 5 III. Major issues------------- 7 1. International legal basis --------------------------------- 7 2. Federal administration organization ---------------------- 8 3. State role --------------------------------------------- 10 4. Competitive impacts of deepwater port development ...... 13 5. Liability ---------------------------------------------- 15 WV.Legislative history - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 17 V. Committee recommendations ------------------------------------ 19 1. Com merce --------------------------------------------19 2. Interior and Insular Affairs ------------------------------ 28 3. Public Works ............... 30 VI. Section-by-Section Analysis ----------------------------------- 34 VIL Cost --------------------------------------- 61 VIII. Tabulation of votes cast in committee --------------------------- 62 IX. Changes in existing law ---------------------------------------- 63 X. Executive communications ....-- 63 XI. Additional views: Additional views of Mr. Buckley ----------------------------- 95 Additional views of Messrs. Fannin, Hansen, McClure, and Bartlett .-- -.. - 97 Additional views of Mr. McClure --------------------------- 103 Additional views of Mr. Stevens ---------------------------- 105 (vii) Calendar No. 1153 93D CONGRESS I SENATE REPORT 2d Session f I No. 93-1217 DEEPWATER PORT ACT OF 1974 OCTOBER 2, 1974.-Ordered to be printed Mr. MAGNUSON, on behalf of the Committees on Commerce; Interior and Insular Affairs; and Public Works, submitted the following JOINT REPORT together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [To accompany S. 5.] The Committees on Commerce; Interior and Insular Affairs; and Public Works report the bill (S. 5.) to regulate commerce, promote efficiency in transportation, and protect the environment, by establish- ing procedures for the location, construction, and operation of deep- water ports off the coasts of the United States, and for other purposes, and recommend that the bill do pass. I. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION The purpose of the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 is to establish a licensing- and regulatory program governing offshore deepwater port development beyond the territorial limits and off the coast of the United States. Such facilities would be used to transfer oil and natural gas supplies transported by tanker to and from States of the United States. 1. FEDERAL COORDINATION The Deepwater Port Act of 1974 authorizes the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating (currently the Department of Transportation) to issue licenses to own, construct and operate deepwater ports. The Secretary exercises this authority in consultation with other Federal agencies having jurisdiction or expertise over various aspects of deepwater port development. Before a license is issued, the Secretary must provide an opportunity for all interested Federal agencies including the Department of the Interior, the Department of State, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Corps of Engineers to comment on the effect issuance of a license would have on the laws and programs they administer. Such agencies would also assure that issuance of a license meets the requirements of the laws they administer. The Federal Trade Commission and the Attorney General are required to comment on whether issuance of a license would adversely affect competition, restrain trade, promote monopolization, or other- wise create a situation in contravention of the antitrust laws. It is intended that the Secretary will give serious consideration to the views of the Federal Trade Commission and the Attorney General in making his determination to approve or disapprove an application. In addition, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may veto the issuance of a license if he finds that deepwater port development, as proposed in an application, would result in violation of the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, or the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act. The Secretary, in coordination with all other Federal agencies, must also prepare a detailed environmental impact statement to satisfy the requirements of section 102(2)(c) of the National Environ- mental Policy Act. 2. PREFERENCES Section 5(d) of the Act requires the Secretary to establish a geo- graphic application area encompassing the site of a deepwater port as proposed in an application and to publish a description of the area, giving time for competing applications to be filed. Section 5(h) requires the Secretary first to consider competing appli- cations within any application area on the basis of which will "best" serve the nation.'Such a consideration shall include a comparison of such factors as the environmental, technological, economic and timing aspects of the various applications. If the Secretary finds that competing applications are relatively equal under that test, then the Secretary is required to give preference to an application from a State or local governmental unit. In the absence of an application by such a governmental entity, the Secretary must then give an applicant who is independent of the petroleum or natural gas producing, refining, or marketing industry preference over the application of any other person. 3. STATE COORDINATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frank Church, And/ Or United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, And/Or U.S
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 84652B 11 July 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 7 June 2016 for Intellipedia pages on the Church Committee, and/ or Frank Church, and/ or United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, and/or U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. A copy of your request is enclosed. In our initial response to you, dated 8 June 2016, we informed you that this request was assigned case number 84652 and that there are no assessable fees for this request. We provided you with two responsive documents on 12 August 2016 and informed you that we continued to work on your case. The final responsive documents are enclosed. This Agency is authorized by statute to protect certain information concerning its activities (in this case, internal URLs) as well as the names of its employees. Such information is exempt from disclosure pursuant to the third exemption of the FOIA, which provides for the withholding of information specifically protected from disclosure by statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the Jackson Legacy Peter Beinart
    Henry M. Jackson Foundation 1501 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1580 Seattle, Washington 98101-3225 Telephone: 206.682.8565 Fax: 206.682.8961 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.hmjackson.org Henry M. Jackson Foundation TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY LECTURE nterpreting the JacksonI Legacy in a Post-9/11 Landscape By Peter Beinart About the Foundation Since its establishment in 1983, the Henry M. Jackson Foundation has been dedicated to helping nonprofit organizations and educational institutions in the United States and Russia. The Foundation’s grants provide essential support and seed funding for new initiatives that offer promising models for replication and address critical issues in four areas in which the late Senator Henry M. “Scoop” Jackson played a key leadership role during his forty-three- year tenure in the United States Congress: Inter- national Affairs Education, Environment and Nat- ural Resources Management, Public Service, and Human Rights. About this Publication On the occasion of its twenty-fifth anniversary, the Henry M. Jackson Foundation hosted a dinner and conversation at the National Press Club in Wash- ington, D.C.. Journalist Peter Beinart was invited to share his thoughts on the Jackson legacy and the Foundation’s commemorative publication, The Nature of Leadership, Lessons from an Exemplary Statesman. Foundation Executive Director Lara Iglitzin served as moderator for the discussion that followed his remarks. nterpreting the JacksonI Legacy in a Post-9/11 Landscape WASHINGTON, D.C. • SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 y y Connoll r y Har Photo b PETER BEINART Peter Beinart is a senior fellow at The Council on Foreign Relations. He is also editor-at-large of The New Republic, a Time contributor, and a monthly columnist for The Washington Post.
    [Show full text]
  • BOB DOLE Unf Ej States Senate BD: Bj
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu ecember 3, 1970 rs. Christine Stevens, Secretary Society for Animal Protection Legislation P. 0. Box 3719 Washington, D. C. 20007 Dear rs. Stevens: C rtainly thank you for sending me a copy of your Newsletter regarding the Animal Welfare Act of 1970. Very ch appreciate your co ents, and hopefully, we will be successful in expediting passage of this important legislation. In the meanti , if there is any way I may b of assistance, let me know. Sincerely yours, BOB DOLE Unf eJ States Senate BD: bj Page 1 of 6 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu · Witittb ~tatts ~tnatt MEMORANDUM Senator Dole---- FYI Mrs. Stevens called last week and I sent your statement. Hyde says she is one of the prime boosters of this bill. She is also the wife of Roger Stevens, who Gyde says runs the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. tag Page 2 of 6 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEGISLATION http://dolearchives.ku.edu P. 0. Box 3719 Georgetown Station Washington, D. C. 20007 November 30, 1970 Mr. William Taggart Office of Senator Robert Dole Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Taggart, Thanks for sending me the Senator's remarks when he introduced the Animal Welfare Act of 1970. I appreciate your getting this off to me in New York. This made it possible to quote Senator Dole in the enclosed circular letter which we have sent out to interested persons throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hells Canyon Dam Controversy
    N 1956, AT THE TENDER AGE OF THIRTY-TWO, Frank Church made a bold bid for the United States Senate. After squeak- I ing out a victory in the hotly contested Idaho Democratic pri- mary, Church faced down incumbent Senator Herman Welker, re- ceiving nearly percent of the vote. One issue that loomed over the campaign was an emerging dis- pute over building dams in the Snake River’s Hells Canyon. While Church and other Democrats supported the construction of a high federal dam in the Idaho gorge, their Republican opponents favored developing the resource through private utility companies. Idaho EVOLUTION voters split on the issue, and so, seeking to avoid a divisive debate, Church downplayed his position during the general election “be- of an cause it was not a winning issue, politically.”1 Senator Frank Church Although Church won the election, he could not escape the is- sue. Indeed, his victory and subsequent assignment to the Senate Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs put him at the center of a growing controversy about damming Hells Canyon. Over the next eighteen years, Church wrestled with balancing Idaho’s demand for economic growth and his own pro-development beliefs with an emerging environmental movement’s demand for preservation of nature—in Idaho and across the nation. As he grappled with these competing interests, Church under- went a significant transformation. While Church often supported development early in his Senate career, he, like few others of his time, began to see the value of wild places and to believe that rivers offered more than power production opportunities and irrigation water.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping the US Hand Well Hidden: the Role of the Church Committee in Rethinking US Covert Intervention in the 1970S
    Keeping the US Hand Well Hidden: The Role of the Church Committee in Rethinking US Covert Intervention in the 1970s Julia Kropa A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS WITH HONORS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN April 2, 2018 Advised by Professor Victoria Langland TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………………..ii Timeline……………………………………………………………………………………iii Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: US Covert Involvement and the Death of General Schneider…………………14 The Election of 1970 and Escalation of US Involvement…………………………16 Creating an Atmosphere of Overthrow……………………………………………26 The Aftermath of General Schneider’s Death……………………………………..37 Chapter 2: The Formation of the Church Committee……………………………………..42 The Origins of the Church Committee…………………………………………….45 White House Opposition to the Church Committee……………………………….59 The Committee’s Purpose for Investigating Assassination Plots………………….66 Chapter 3: The Church Committee Investigates Assassination Plots……………………..70 The Church Committee’s Investigation…………………………………………...73 The Investigation Reaches the White House………………………………………81 The Committee’s Interim Report and its Findings………………………………...91 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………96 Appendix 1……………………………………………………………………………….102 Appendix 2……………………………………………………………………………….107 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………...109 i Acknowledgments First and foremost, thank you to my advisor, Professor Victoria Langland, for her guidance and encouragement at every stage of this project from my initial thoughts to the end product. I would like to thank the LSA Honors Program and the History Department for generously providing funding for my research and writing. I am also thankful to my writing group, Maggie and Noah, for reading my many drafts and offering feedback at every step in the process. Many thanks to Emily for listening to me for a year and a half talking and brainstorming out loud, and for forcing me to always keep on working.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Committee Report
    94TH CONGRESS SENATE J REPORT 2d Ssion f 1 No. 94-755 FOREIGN AN]) MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BOOK I FINAL REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES UNITED STATES SENATE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL, SUPPLEMENTAL, AND SEPARATE VIEWS APRIL 26 (legislative day, APRIL 14), 1976 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 69-983 WASHINGTON : 1976 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $5.35 Stock No. 052-071-00470-0 SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES FRANK CHURCH, Idaho, Chairman JOHN G. TOWER, Texas, Vice Chairman PHILIP A. HART, Michigan HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., Tennessee WALTER F. MONDALE, Minnesota BARRY GOLDWATER, Arizona WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, Kentucky CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, Ja., Maryland ROBERT MORGAN, North Carolina RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania GARY HART, Colorado WILLIAM G. MILLER, Staff Director FREDERICK A. 0. SCHWARZ, Jr., Chief Counsel CURTIs R. SMOTHERS, Counsel to the Minority AUDREY HATRY, Cler of the Committee (II) XVI. DISCLOSURE OF BUDGET INFORMATION ON THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY At the present time the aggregate amount spent for the intelligence activities of the United States Government is classified. The individual budgets for the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and certain other units within the Department of Defense which gather national intelligence are likewise classified. The budgets for these agencies-which spend billions of dollars annually-are kept not only from the American people but also from most Members of Congress. This secrecy prevents the public and most Members of Congress from knowing how much is spent on national intelligence and from determining whether that amount is consistent with other national needs and priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S2200
    S2200 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE February 17, 2007 Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I suggest which he has already marked an ex- Without TED KENNEDY, we wouldn’t the absence of a quorum. traordinary milestone—45 years of have lowered the voting age to 18 and The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. service to Massachusetts and his coun- ended the hypocrisy that 18-year-olds TESTER). The clerk will call the roll. try in the U.S. Senate. were old enough to die for their coun- The assistant legislative clerk pro- Senator KENNEDY began his career try in Vietnam but not old enough to ceeded to call the roll. setting a high standard when it comes vote for its leadership at home. Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unan- to birthdays. It was when he reached Without TED KENNEDY, we wouldn’t imous consent that the order for the the minimum constitutional age, 30, be the world’s leader in cancer research quorum call be rescinded. that he first came to the Senate—1 of and prevention—as personal and mean- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without just 16 Senators elected at such a ten- ingful an issue as there is in all the objection, it is so ordered. der age from a total of over 1,895 Sen- world for TED KENNEDY, not just a fa- f ators in all of American history. By his ther, but a loving father of two cancer 70th birthday he was one of just 28 Sen- survivors. ARVA ‘‘MARIE’’ JOHNSON ators to ever cast over 10,000 votes. Without TED KENNEDY, we wouldn’t Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Accountability in Shaping United States Foreign Policies 1970-2020
    Congressional Accountability in Shaping United States Foreign Policies 1970-2020 Gerald Felix Warburg* Center for Effective Lawmaking Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy University of Virginia January 2021 Abstract Congress enacted sweeping reforms of the foreign policymaking process in the 1970s. These legislative initiatives constituted a direct challenge to presidential powers, which had grown since U.S. involvement in World War II, culminating in the ‘imperial’ presidencies of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. Since 1981, there has been a steady erosion of congressional powers to shape national security policies. This study examines the fate of congressional reforms enacted in the post-Vietnam, post-Watergate era, asking: what became of these reform laws? How has congressional authority and accountability been weakened? Interviews with key policymakers inform the study and a bibliographic essay surveying recent research and academic literature provides grounding in extant scholarship. The study concludes with delineation of options for 2021 and beyond for policymakers seeking to restore the constitutional powers of Congress for greater engagement in advancing sustainable national foreign policy commitments. Center for Effective Lawmaking Working Paper 1 I. Introduction: Interbranch Policy Competition, Then and Now The American system was designed to give U.S. legislators a strong voice in shaping foreign policy.(1) The exclusive power to declare war and fund its prosecution, as well as Senate authority to approve ambassadors and treaties, was deliberately placed in Congress. In recent years, Congress has ducked responsibility for key international security decisions. To better secure long-term national security interests, this erosion of accountability must be reversed and reforms adopted by the next Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frank Church Papers
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Library Faculty Publications and Presentations The Albertsons Library 1-1-1988 The rF ank Church Papers : A Summary Guide Including the Papers of Bethine C. Church and Carl Burke Ralph W. Hansen Boise State University Deborah J. Roberts Boise State University Boise State University Library, Special Collections Department ____THE _ FRANK CHURCH PAPERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY BOISE, IDAHO ______THE _ FRANK CHURCH PAPERS A Summary Guide Including the Papers of Bethine C. Church and Carl Burke By Ralph W. Hansen and Deborah J. Roberts Assisted by Ellen Koger and David Kennedy Funding for the publication of this guide was provided, in part, by the Idaho Humanities Council, a state-based program of the National Endowment for the Humanities. IDAHO ~ Boise State University Library Special Collections Department Boise, Idaho 1988 Copyright ©1988 by Boise State University. Contents Acknowledgements iii Preface by President John H. Keiser 1 Introduction 2 Frank Church Biography 4 The Frank Church Chair of Public Affairs 6 The Papers 8 Legislation Files 9 Senate Committees 13 Federal Government 16 Idaho , .19 Campaigns 20 Political Affairs 21 Public Relations 22 Speeches 24 Administration 25 Personal 26 Audio-Visual Collection 28 Bethine Church Papers 30 Carl Burke Papers 31 Frank Church Chronology 32 The conclusions and opinions in this work do not necessarily represent the views of either the Idaho Humanities Councilor the National Endowment for the Humanities. ii The Boise State University Library Wishes to Thank All Those Who Helped Process ____ THE FRANK CHURCH PAPERS Timothy A. Brown, University Librarian Ralph W. Hansen, Project Director Frank Church Papers Ellen Koger, Processing Supervisor R.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward "Ted" Kaufman Oral History
    EDWARD E. (TED) KAUFMAN United States Senator from Delaware and Chief of Staff to Senator Joe Biden Oral History Interviews August 17 - 24, 2011, September 27, 2012 Senate Historical Office Washington, DC Deed of Gift I, Edward E. Kaufman, do hereby give to the Senate Historical Office the recordings and transcripts of my interviews between August 17 and 24, 2011 and on September 27, 2012. I authorize the Senate Historical Office to use the recordings and transcripts in such a manner as may best serve the educational and historical objectives of their oral history program. I also approve the deposit of the transcripts at the Library of Congress, the National Archives, the Senate Library, and any other institution which the Senate Historical Office may deem appropriate. In making this gift, I voluntarily convey ownership of the tapes and transcripts to the public domain. ([date] Accepted on behalf of the Senate Historical Office by: Donald A. Ritchie Table of Contents Preface. i Interview # 1: Engineering, Business, and Politics. 1 Interview #2: Chief of Staff. 44 Interview #3: Biden for President. 91 Interview #4: Teaching About Congress. 125 Interview #5: Senator from Delaware. 167 Interview #6: The Financial Meltdown. 206 Interview #7: National Security. 257 Interview #8: The Most Exclusive Club. 289 Interview #9: Life After the Senate. 342 Interview #10: The Man in the Arena. 379 Index. 396 Appendices Dedication To Lynne, who is the love of my life, my best friend and has made all this possible. To Mom, who taught me to fight for what I believe in, and Dad, who was the greatest man I have ever known.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Campaign to Recall Idaho Senator Frank Church Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Mark Moore
    AN ABSTRACT CF THE THESIS OF Cheri L. Andrews for the degree of Master of Arts in speech communication, political science, and speech communication presented on May 5,1992. Title: The Victory in Vietnam Committee's Manichean Rhetoric: An Analysis of the Campaign to Recall Idaho Senator Frank Church Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Mark Moore The purpose of this study is to illuminate the role, the function, and the ironic outcome of the Victory in Vietnam Committee's campaign pamphlet to recall Senator F-ank Church of Idaho in 1967. The VVC's political strategy was to build credibility with the media through the recall pamphlet. The analysis of the recall pamphlet shows the failure of the Victory in Vietnam Committee to adapt to the intended audience, the media. The pamphlet is further evaluated in the context of manichean rhetoric to highlight the unethical use of credibility building techniques and the ultimate goal of the VVC to stifle Church's dissent with respect to the Vietnam War. The irony of the Victory in Vietnam Committee's explanatory pamphlet is that instead of helping to oust Church by exposing his faults, it caused the downfall of the Victory in Vietnam Committee. The Victory in Vietnam Committee's Manichean Rhetoric: An Analysis of the Campaign to Recall Idaho Senator Frank Church by Cheri L. Andrews A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Completed May 5,1992 Commencement June 1992 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Dr. Mark Moore Assistant Professor of ,breech Communication in charge of major Redacted for Privacy Dr.
    [Show full text]