DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Social Capital Among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Social Capital Among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine Does Cooperation Pay? The Role of Social Ca pital among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine . Does Cooperation Pay? The Role of Social Capital among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine Axel Wolz, Jana Fritzsch, Gertrud Buchenrieder, Andriy Nedoborovskyy* Abstract: Social capital matters, not the least in determining individual welfare. It is argued that it functions similar to traditional production factors. However, there are not many empirical analyses about this issue at the farm- household level in general and in post-communist countries in particular. Whether or not social capital affects farm income is tested using micro-data from 255 household plot farmers in Ukraine. The data reflect 23 social capital indicators. These are merged in four separate index variables. The index variables reflect the theoretical dimensions of social capital, namely form, i.e. structural and cognitive, and relationship, i.e. bonding and bridging. By adopting multiple regression analysis, it can be shown that social capital in the form of bridging is indeed a significant factor for determining the level of agricultural income. However, the findings also underline the multidimensional side of social capital. Both bonding and cognitive social capital show no immediate impact on agricultural income among household plot farmers in Ukraine. Keywords: empirical survey, household farming, agricultural income, social capital, Ukraine JEL: O13, P32, Q12, Z13 DOI: 10.2478/v10033-010-0015-2 1. Introduction In general, the transition of the agricultural sector As an additional reason, it has been argued that the poor from a centrally planned to a market economy has not and disappointing results of the transformation process been as successful as originally anticipated in most countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and the * Axel Wolz Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). A number of Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in reasons have been given, which can be summarised as Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO) follows (ROZELLE and SWINNEN 2004; BEZEMER 2002): E-mail: [email protected] underdeveloped rural financial systems and complicated modes of farm restructuring led to limited access to loans Jana Fritzsch owing to a lack of profitability, collateral problems, risks Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in and uncertainty. Similarly, the farm sector was Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO) characterised by a weak human capital structure, Gertrud Buchenrieder fragmented land ownership, rapid changes in agricultural Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg policies and an incomplete legal framework (for a summary of the impediments and achievements of Andriy Nedoborovskyy transformation in the agri-food sector see BUCHENRIEDER et Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in al. 2009). In this respect, the risk-averse behaviour of Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO) economic agents like farmers was seen as quite rational. November 2010 5555 Does Cooperation Pay? The Role of Social Ca pital among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine . Corporate farms Peasant farms Household plots Number of units 17,700 43,000 ~ 5,500,000 Share of agricultural land (%) a) 58.7 8.2 33.1 Average size (hectares) 1384.0 80.0 2.5 Share of gross agricultural output (%) b) 35.8 3.9 60.3 Source: LERMAN et al. 2007, pp. 1-2, 21, 29 Note: a) Total area: 42 million hectares b) At 2000 prices Table 1: Distribution of total farm number, size and production in Ukraine (2004) have been due to a low level of social capital (e.g. PALDAM peasant farmers. Subsequently, it can be stated safely and SVENDSEN 2000). that agricultural production is still dominated by so-called Over the last few years, the number of studies of the household plot farmers. They provide about 60 percent of role of social capital in CEE and CIS has increased. For the total gross agricultural output. Business-oriented example, a very comprehensive overview of research on farms play a minor role. social capital in CEE has been presented by MIHAYLOVA The main reason for the strong role of household plot (2004). However, while the number of studies about the farms seems to be the necessity of securing the family’s impact of social capital on rural development is rising, food consumption.1 Moreover, surplus production forms there are just a few focusing on the agricultural sector. an important source of income and helps to improve Researchers are just starting to look in more detail into standard of living. While LERMAN et al. (2007) described the concept of social capital and its relevance for these farms as semi-commercial, one could also call them agricultural development. Among others, CHLOUPKOVA semi-subsistence farms. Obviously, household plot and BJORNKOV (2002), HUDECKOVA and LOSTAK (2003) and farmers do not form a homogeneous group. Some seem WOLZ et al. (2006a) analysed data from the Czech to be more economically successful than others. In Republic; FORGACS (2008) from Hungary, WOLZ et al. general, a varying adoption of production factors, i.e. (2006b) from Poland, LERMAN and MIRZAKHANIAN (2001) land, labour and capital is identified in economics as and KASARJYAN (2010) from Armenia. All these studies being of influence. Additional factors might be the level confirm that social capital in one form or the other is of human capital, particularly age and educational level. significant in increasing agricultural income. However, it has been observed that similar endowments Up to the break-up of the Soviet Union and its of production factors do not necessarily lead to similar independence, agricultural production in Ukraine was economic results (see e.g. SLANGEN et al. 2004; LEE et al. characterised by state (sovkhoz) and collective farms 2005). Therefore, we argue that there is an additional, so (kolkhoz). The subsequent reform process has been far under-rated factor of production, which significantly lengthy and in many ways a difficult process. The first affects agricultural income among household plot round of reform in 1992-93 initiated privatisation of land farmers in Ukraine. We will test this hypothesis in making through the distribution of paper shares to the rural use of farm survey data from 255 household plot farmers population and mandated the transformation of former in Ukraine, and which had been gathered in autumn state and collective farms into shareholder structures. The 2006. With this paper we intend to contribute to the second round of reforms started in late 1999 when clarification of the concept of social capital in agricultural corporate farms were obliged to convert their paper development. shares into fully titled land plots. Hence, nearly seven Our contribution is structured as follows: in the million rural residents became owners of physical land beginning we discuss the concept of social capital, its plots (LERMAN et al. 2007). Following these two rounds of dimensions and definition. The major part of the study reform the agricultural sector a dual land tenure structure emerged. On the one hand, about 17,700 large-scale 1 DAVIDOVA et al. (2010) convincingly showed for several countries in CEE corporate farms cultivate, on average, about 1,400 ha per (Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovenia) that non-marketed farm production (in other words subsistence income) lifts semi- farm, and on the other hand, about 5.5 million (more subsistence farmers above the national poverty line. They found that, on subsistence oriented) household farmers cultivate, on the one hand, subsistence income is substantial, amounting to 58.5 average, about 2.5 ha per household (Table 1). In- percent of household income, and that subsistence income, on the other hand, is more important for households that are below the between there is a relatively small group of about 43,000 poverty line. Especially in Bulgaria and Poland, subsistence income shifts a large share of the farming population from poor to non-poor. 56 SEE Journal Does Cooperation Pay? The Role of Social Ca pital among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine . will be made up by an analysis of the empirical farm economists” anymore (GOETZ and RUPASINGHA 2006, p. survey data investigating whether social capital has an 1304). influence on their material welfare. A short concluding Therefore, the major challenge has been to develop a section follows. ‘lean and mean conceptualisation’ when applying the concept (WOOLCOCK 2002) or to follow a ‘narrow focus’ 2. Concept of Social Capital (DURLAUF and FAFCHAMPS 2005). One promising option is to focus on its sources. Like capital in general, social The concept of social capital, although adopted rather capital represents a stock of assets that yields a flow of recently in social and economic sciences, has become benefits, like e.g. income streams. We follow this very popular. In broad terms, it can be defined as approach by referring to SPORLEDER and WU (2007, p. 3) networks, norms and trust which facilitate information who define social capital as “the sum of the actual and sharing, collective decision-making and collective action. potential resources embedded within or available Its usefulness has been derived from the observation that through a network of relationships that is possessed by social networks are vital in managing one’s daily life. an individual or a firm”. To improve the operationalisation These networks, however, are not naturally given. of social capital, GROOTAERT and VAN BASTELAER (2002) Investments in the institutionalisation of group relations propose to focus on its dimensions. Basically, three major are necessary. The group relation might then be usable as dimensions can be distinguished: They are (1) its scope a source for other benefits (PORTES 1998). But researchers (or unit of observation), (2) its forms (or manifestations) disagree, among other things, whether it should be and (3) its type of relationship through which social attributed to the individual (e.g. BOURDIEU 1983) or capital affects development: considered group property (e.g. COLEMAN 1988; PUTNAM • With respect to scope, the micro, meso and macro 1993) aggravating commonly accepted theory building.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Economic Effects of Land Reform in Tajikistan
    FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Policy Studies on Rural Transition No. 2008-1 The Economic Effects of Land Reform in Tajikistan Zvi Lerman and David Sedik October 2008 The Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia of the Food and Agriculture Organization distributes this policy study to disseminate findings of work in progress and to encourage the exchange of ideas within FAO and all others interested in development issues. This paper carries the name of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, its management, or any member countries. Zvi Lerman is Sir Henry d’Avigdor Goldsmid Professor of Agricultural Economics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel David Sedik is the Senior Agricultural Policy Officer in the FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia. Contents Executive summary . 1 1. Introduction: purpose of the study. 5 2. Agriculture in Tajikistan. 7 2.1. Geography of agriculture in Tajikistan. 8 Agro-climatic zones of Tajikistan. 10 Regional structure of agriculture. 13 2.2. Agricultural transition in Tajikistan: changes in output and inputs. 15 Agricultural land. 16 Agricultural labor. 17 Livestock. 17 Farm machinery. 19 Fertilizer use. 19 3. Land reform legislation and changes in land tenure in Tajikistan. 21 3.1. Legal framework for land reform and farm reorganization. 21 3.2. Changes in farm structure and land tenure since independence. 24 4. The economic effects of land reform . 27 4.1. Recovery of agricultural production in Tajikistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Restructuring and Trends in Rural Inequalities in Central Asia a Socio-Statistical Survey
    Agricultural Restructuring and Trends in Rural Inequalities in Central Asia A Socio-Statistical Survey Max Spoor Civil Society and Social Movements United Nations Programme Paper Number 13 Research Institute November 2004 for Social Development This United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) Programme Paper has been produced with the support of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and UNRISD core funds. UNRISD thanks the governments of Denmark, Finland, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom for this funding. Copyright © UNRISD. Short extracts from this publication may be reproduced unaltered without authorization on condi- tion that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to UNRISD, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNRISD welcomes such applications. The designations employed in this publication, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presenta- tion of material herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNRISD or the FAO con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the author(s), and publication does not constitute endorse- ment by UNRISD or the FAO. ISSN 1020-8178 Contents Acronyms iii Glossary iii Acknowledgements iii Summary/Résumé/Resumen iv Summary iv Résumé v Resumen vii I. Introduction 1 II. Conditions in Central Asia at the Outset of Transition 3 Tsarist and Soviet legacies in the Central Asian economy and agricultural sector 5 The political economy of the Central Asian states 6 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform in Central and Eastern Europe After 1989 and Its Outcome in the Form of Farm Structures and Land Fragmentation
    Land Tenure Working Paper 24 Land reform in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989 and its outcome in the form of farm structures and land fragmentation Morten Hartvigsen ORBICON 2013 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Land reform in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989 and its outcome in the form of farm structures and land fragmentation Morten Hartvigsen ORBICON 2013 Photograph on the cover: Popovo Polje, Bosnia and Herzegovina Photography: Morten Hartvigsen The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. Land reform and fragmentation in Central and Eastern Europe Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank Attila Blenesi-Dima, Vilma Daugaliene, Katja Dells, Richard Eberlin, David Egiashvili, Stig Enemark, Vladimir Evtimov, Maxim Gorgan, Jolanta Gorska, Niels Otto Haldrup, Evelin Jürgenson, Diana Kopeva, Zoran Knezevic, Anka Lisec, Stevan Marosan, Andras Ossko, David Palmer, Daiga Parsova, Dace Platonova, Ana Budanko Penavic, Audrius Petkevicius, Kiril Stoyanov, Esben Munk Sørensen and others for providing very useful information and for comments and review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Social Capital Among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Wolz, Axel; Fritzsch, Jana; Buchenrieder, Gertrud; Nedoborovskyy, Andriy Article — Published Version Does cooperation pay? The role of social capital among household plot farmers in Ukraine South East European Journal of Economics and Business Provided in Cooperation with: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale) Suggested Citation: Wolz, Axel; Fritzsch, Jana; Buchenrieder, Gertrud; Nedoborovskyy, Andriy (2010) : Does cooperation pay? The role of social capital among household plot farmers in Ukraine, South East European Journal of Economics and Business, ISSN 2233-1999, Sciendo, Warsaw, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, pp. 55-64, http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10033-010-0015-2 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/234573 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Policies and Evolving Farm Structures in Transition Countries
    Land Policies and Evolving Farm Structures in Transition Countries By Zvi Lerman (Hebrew University) Csaba Csaki (World Bank) and Gershon Feder (World Bank) January 2002 Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................3 Chapter 1. The Arena and the Common Heritage...........................................................13 Chapter 2. Divergent Approaches to Reform: Land Policies .........................................55 Chapter 3. Divergent Approaches to Reform: Changes in Farm Structure ....................85 Chapter 4. Lessons of Transition in Agriculture...........................................................149 Sources and References ................................................................................................169 ABSTRACT The study reviews the role of land policies in the evolving farm structures of the transition economies in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). It demonstrates how different policies with regard to private property rights in land, degrees of control of land rental and sale markets, and procedures for restructuring of former collective or state farms resulted in significantly different farm structures in CEE countries as compared to most of the CIS. In particular, more secure land rights, greater emphasis on individualization
    [Show full text]
  • The Political and Geographical Factors of Agrarian Change in Tajikistan
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hofman, Irna; Visser, Oane Working Paper Geographies of transition: The political and geographical factors of agrarian change in Tajikistan Discussion Paper, No. 151 Provided in Cooperation with: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale) Suggested Citation: Hofman, Irna; Visser, Oane (2014) : Geographies of transition: The political and geographical factors of agrarian change in Tajikistan, Discussion Paper, No. 151, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-34506 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/104004 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Ukraine Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Ukraine
    Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Ukraine Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Ukraine Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Ukraine Zvi Lerman Karen Brooks Csaba Csaki Copyright © 1994 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing December 1994 Discussion Papers present results of country analysis or research that are circulated to encourage discussion and comment within the development community. To present these results with the least possible delay, the typescript of this paper has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Requests for permission to reproduce portions of it should be sent to the Office of the Publisher at the address shown in the copyright notice above.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform in Ukraine
    Land Reform in Ukraine Delivered by The World Bank e-library to: FAO of the UN IP : 168.202.50.34 Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:37:18 (c) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank Land Reform in Ukraine Land Reform in Ukraine The First Five Years WORLD BANK DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 371 Csaba Csaki Zvi Lerman The World Bank Washington, D.C. Copyright 1997 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing August 1997 Discussion Papers present results of country analysis or research that are circulated to encourage discussion and comment within the development community. To present these results with the least possible delay, the typescript of this paper has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Lines in the Landscape Land Reform and the Landscape in Southern Ukraine
    THESIS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN GEOGRAPHY June 2010 Lines in the Landscape Land reform and the landscape in southern Ukraine Brian Kuns Thesis in Human Geography (Master’s level) 30 ECTS Supervisor: Mats Widgren and Andrej Kotlyarchuk Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm www.humangeo.su.se Acknowledgements Field Studies are built on the kindness and curiosity of a great many strangers, who take time out of their busy schedules to indulge the questions of an outsider. This is another way of saying there I owe a debt of gratitude to a great many people in Kherson, without whom I would not have been able to complete this project. Special thanks go to Hrihory Baran from Kherson State University. I also wish to acknowledge the hospitality and assistance offered by the Kherson State Agricultural University, and specifically, the Vice Rector Vladimir Morozov, Professor Mykhaylo Ivanovich Fedorchuk, and Researcher Alexei Morozov. The International Finance Corporation office in Kherson also provided critical assistance and thanks go out to Ebbe Johnson and Lyuda Podakova. I wish to say a special thanks to all the respondents who, with spring planting season in full swing, took time out of their busy days to tell me about their farms. This research project was made possible by a Minor Field Studies Stipend, which is funded by Sida, administered by the International Program Office, and distributed by, in my case, the Department of Human Geography at Stockholm University, so I would like to thank each of them for the financial and other assistance I received making this project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects of the Farming Sector and Rural Development in View of Food Security
    LF-NA-26256-EN-N As the Commission’s in-house science service, the Joint Research Centre’s mission is to provide EU policies with independent, evidence-based scientific and technical support throughout the whole policy cycle. JRC SCIENTIFIC AND POLICY REPORTS Working in close cooperation with policy Directorates-General, the JRC addresses key societal challenges while stimulating innovation through developing new standards, methods and tools, and sharing and transferring its know-how to the Member States and international community. Key policy areas include: environment and climate change; energy and transport; agriculture and food security; health and consumer protection; information society and digital agenda; safety and security including nuclear; all supported through a cross-cutting and multidisciplinary approach. Prospects of the farming sector and rural development in view of food security The case of the Russian Federation Vassily Uzun Valera Saraikin Ekaterina Gataulina Natalia Shagaida Renata Yanbykh Sébastien Mary Sergio Gomez y Paloma 2014 Prospects of the farming sector and rural development in view of food security: The case of the Russian Federation. Prospects of the farming sector and rural development in view food security: Report EUR 26256 EN European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Contact information Address: Edificio Expo. c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. E-41092 Seville (Spain) E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +34 954488318 Fax: +34 954488300 http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu European Commission Legal Notice EUR 26256 - Joint Research Centre – Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • PN N5.35Da I1711n5 Venter for AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC RESEARCH
    37g.5694 94506 t,PN n5.35Da I1711n5 _ vENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC RESEARCH Working Paper No. 9506 NEW STYLE OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION by ZVI LERMAN vaiie ,_ibrary )ept. of Applied Economics !niversity of Minnosota 994 .Eiford Ave - 232 ClaOff 1JIAAN 5510a-8040 USA Rehovot, Israel, ROB. 12 411 % l The working papers in this series are preliminary nwr on It nilma ipnon nnrin and circulated for the purpose of discussion. The rnyin .nrwn n5api pr75 Invmi views expressed in the papers do not reflect those mi ninpvm irm DIa rnyamn of the Center for Agricultural Economic Research. .nni5pn n5D5D2 1pn)35 Dim rny-t e A Working Paper No. 9506 NEW STYLE OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION by ZVI LERMAN THE CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC RESEARCH P.O. Box 12, Rehovot NEW STYLE OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION Zvi Lerman Department ofAgricultural Economics and Management The Hebrew University ofJerusalem, Israel Paper prepared for the meetings of the Canadian Association for Studies in Co- operation Structures and Cultures of Co-operatives, University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, Canada, June 7-9, 1995. • NEW STYLE OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN THE FORMER SOVIET • .• UNION' • Zvi Lerman Department of Agricultural Economics and Management The Hebrew University. of Jerusalim,. Israel • The 15 countries of the former Soviet Union span nine time zones, with Eastern and Central Europe (without former Yugoslavia) adding 8 more countries in a tenth time zone to the economic and political block that during decades was dominated by the USSR, and more directly by Russia as the largest member and the main ideologue of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Agricultural Reform in Ukraine
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lerman, Zvi; Sedik, David; Pugachov, Nikolai; Goncharuk, Aleksandr Research Report Rethinking agricultural reform in Ukraine Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe, No. 38 Provided in Cooperation with: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale) Suggested Citation: Lerman, Zvi; Sedik, David; Pugachov, Nikolai; Goncharuk, Aleksandr (2007) : Rethinking agricultural reform in Ukraine, Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe, No. 38, ISBN 3-938584-18-1, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO), Halle (Saale), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-2454 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45946 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]