DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Mobility Assessment Report(Opens in a New Tab)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Mobility Assessment Report(Opens in a New Tab) Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Components and Sources of Data ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Key Terms and Definitions .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Roadway Congestion ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Intersections .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Bicycle and Pedestrian .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Public Transportation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Transportation Trends .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Changes in the Transportation Industry .................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Roadway Mobility Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 County Overview....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Summary of Roadway Conditions in 2015 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Congestion Trends ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Aspen Hill and Olney Vicinity ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Norbeck Road (MD-28) from Baltimore Road (northernmost intersection) to MD-182 .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia Ave (MD-97) from Aspen Hill Rd to Brookeville Rd ............................................................................................................................................................... 23 Bethesda Central Business District, Bethesda/Chevy Chase, and Friendship Heights ................................................................................................ 24 Connecticut Avenue (MD-185) from DC line to Capital Beltway (I-495)............................................................................................................................................ 25 MD-355 from DC line to Capital Beltway (I-495) ................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Clarksburg ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Ridge Road (MD-27) from Brink Road to Davis Mill Road ................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Frederick Road (MD-355) from Brink Road to Comus Road ............................................................................................................................................................... 29 Damascus .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 Ridge Road (MD-27) from Davis Mill Road to Gue Road .................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Cloverly, Fairland/Colesville, White Oak .................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Columbia Pike (US-29) from University Boulevard (MD-193) to Sandy Spring Road (MD-198) ....................................................................................................... 33 2017 Mobility Assessment Report | Planning Board Draft | February 2017 1 New Hampshire Avenue (MD-650) from Capital Beltway (I-495) to Ednor Road ............................................................................................................................. 34 Gaithersburg, R&D Village, North Potomac, and Montgomery Village ...................................................................................................................... 35 Clopper Road (MD-117) from Longdraft Road to South Summit Avenue ......................................................................................................................................... 36 Frederick Road (MD-355) from I-370 to Plummer Drive .................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Germantown Town Center, Germantown East, Germantown West .......................................................................................................................... 38 Frederick Road (MD-355) from Plummer Road to Brink Road ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 Clopper Road (MD-117) from Longdraft Road to Richter Farm Road ................................................................................................................................................ 40 North Bethesda, White Flint, Twinbrook, Grosvenor ................................................................................................................................................. 41 Old Georgetown Road (MD-187) from the Capital Beltway (I-495) to Rockville Pike (MD-355) ...................................................................................................... 42 Randolph Road from Gaynor Road to Rockville Pike (MD-355) ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 Potomac ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 River Road (MD-190) from the Capital Beltway (I-495) to Piney Meetinghouse Road ..................................................................................................................... 45 Montrose Road from I-270 to Falls Road (MD-189) ........................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Rockville City, Rockville Town Center Shady Grove Metro Center, Derwood ............................................................................................................. 47 Veirs Mill Road (MD-586) from Twinbrook Parkway to Jefferson Street ........................................................................................................................................... 48 MD-28 from Baltimore Road to Veirs Mill Road (MD-586) and from Rockville Pike (MD-355) to Shady Grove Road .................................................................... 49 Rural East .................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Purple Line Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park Crossing
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 1, 2018 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Purple Line Light Rail Transit Facility 7949 Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park Montgomery County, Maryland NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER 76.45.02(41.23)44678 SUBMITTED BY Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning APPLICANT’S REQUEST Commission Approval of preliminary and final site development plans REVIEW AUTHORITY PROPOSED ACTION Capper Cramton Act Review Approve preliminary and final site per 46 Stat. 482 development plans ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY On behalf of the Maryland Transit Authority, the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission has requested preliminary and final review of site development plans on Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park property to accommodate the new Purple Line light rail transit facility. The new transit line will cross through the park along Wayne Avenue (within its vehicular traffic lanes), across Sligo Creek via a new (widened) bridge and across the Sligo Creek Parkway. The Purple Line is planned as a 16-mile, regionally-significant, transit facility between Bethesda, Maryland (Montgomery County) and New Carrollton, Maryland (Prince George’s County), providing east- west connectivity between the Metrorail’s Red, Orange, and Green Lines. Construction will occur between 2018-2021 within the Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park. KEY INFORMATION • NCPC has approval authority of the project since the site is located on property acquired with federal funding appropriated under the 1930 Capper Cramton Act. The Act was intended to provide for the acquisition of lands in Maryland and Virginia to develop a comprehensive park, parkway, and playground system in the National Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • 1542‐1550 First Street, Sw Design Review
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW 1542‐1550 FIRST STREET, SW DESIGN REVIEW WASHINGTON, DC August 4, 2017 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 17-13 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.17-13 DeletedEXHIBIT NO.17A Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC
    1 Reimagining DC 295 as a vital multi modal corridor: The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC Jonathan L. Bush A capstone thesis paper submitted to the Executive Director of the Urban & Regional Planning Program at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Masters of Professional Studies in Urban & Regional Planning. Faculty Advisor: Howard Ways, AICP Academic Advisor: Uwe S. Brandes, M.Arch © Copyright 2017 by Jonathan L. Bush All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT Cities across the globe are making the case for highway removal. Highway removal provides alternative land uses, reconnects citizens and natural landscapes separated by the highway, creates mobility options, and serves as a health equity tool. This Capstone studies DC 295 in Washington, DC and examines the cases of San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway, Milwaukee’s Park East Freeway, New York City’s Sheridan Expressway and Seoul, South Korea’s Cheonggyecheon Highway. This study traces the history and the highway removal success using archival sources, news circulars, planning documents, and relevant academic research. This Capstone seeks to provide a platform in favor DC 295 highway removal. 3 KEYWORDS Anacostia, Anacostia Freeway, Anacostia River, DC 295, Highway Removal, I-295, Kenilworth Avenue, Neighborhood Planning, Southeast Washington DC, Transportation Planning, Urban Infrastructure RESEARCH QUESTIONS o How can Washington’s DC 295 infrastructure be modified to better serve local neighborhoods? o What opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Congestion Analysis Report for the Baltimore Region Top 10
    Quarterly Congestion Analysis Report for the Baltimore Region Top 10 Bottleneck Locations 2nd Quarter 2018 Table of Contents About the region .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 How bottleneck conditions are tracked .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Maps Defined ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Top 10 Bottleneck Map .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Top 10 Bottleneck List ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 #1-10 Ranked Bottlenecks with Maps, Timeline, Traffic Counts and Notes .......................................................................................................................... 8-27 Speed Maps for the Baltimore Region (AM and PM Peak) ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study Final Report
    I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study - FINAL REPORT- Presented to: Submitted By: September 2015 Cover Letter Tollway Towers North, Suite 870 15770 North Dallas Parkway Ali K. Soroush, Ph.D. Dallas, TX 75248 Project Manager Tel: 214-245-5300 [email protected] Fax: 214-889-5049 Date: September 23, 2015 To: Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. Program Manager Office of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships Virginia Department of Transportation Subject: I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study Final Report Dear Mr. Farajian, C&M Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the Final Report of the I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study. This report presents an overview of the proposed project, an assessment of existing traffic conditions and socioeconomic data in the project area, and an overview of field data collection and analyses. The report also presents details regarding the modeling approach, methodology, and, most importantly, the traffic and revenue forecast. The C&M project team expresses its sincere gratitude to VDOT for providing the opportunity to participate in this project. Respectfully, Carlos M. Contreras, MBA Ali Soroush, Ph.D. President Project Manager I-66 Express Lanes Outside the Capital Beltway Intermediate Traffic and Revenue Study Prepared For: By: Final Report September 2015 Disclaimer The results of this study constitute the opinion of C&M with respect to the tolled facility’s future traffic and revenue. The traffic and revenue projections provided in this report were developed based on standard professional practices and the information available at the time the study was executed, subject to the time and budget constraints of the study’s scope of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown University Frequently Asked Questions
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ADDRESS Georgetown University 37th and O Streets, NW Washington, DC 20057 DIRECTIONS TO GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY From Reagan National Airport (20 minutes) This airport is the closest airport to Georgetown University. A taxicab ride from Reagan National costs approximately $15-$20 one way. Take the George Washington Parkway North. Follow signs for Key Bridge/Route 50. Follow until Key Bridge exit. You will want to be in the left lane as you cross over Key Bridge. At the end of Key Bridge take a left at the light. This is Canal Road. Enter campus at the Hoya Saxa sign, to the right. This road will take you to main campus parking. See attached campus map for further directions. From Washington/Dulles Airport (40 minutes) Taxicabs from Dulles International cost approximately $50-$55 one way. Follow Dulles airport Access road to I-66. Follow I-66 to the Key Bridge Exit. Exit and stay in left lane. At the third light take a left and stay in one of the middle lanes. You will want to be in the left lane as you cross over Key Bridge. At the end of Key Bridge take a left at the light. This is Canal Road. Enter campus at the Hoya Saxa sign, to the right. This road will take you to main campus parking. See attached campus map for further directions. From New York to Washington D.C. By car, approximately 230 miles (4.5 hours) www.mapquest.com By train (approx 3 hours) approx. $120 each way www.amtrak.com By plane (approx 1.5 hours) approx $280 www.travelocity.com ACCOMMODATION The following hotels are closest to the University, for other hotel and discounted rates, you may like to try: www.cheaptickets.com www.cheaphotels.com Note: You can often get better rates through the above site than going through the hotel directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability Enhancement Program Work Plan Location-Subdivision Or MC SAIFI Contribution J and Cheltenham Dr., Bethesda, MD
    Reliability Enhancement Program Work Plan Montgomery County e nt s e e k r nt T m e e or ( k c m a e t l or t W n p ov W n e e h e t r m R de pr m e a ng) e ow m de e g i l r I Location Feeder Location-Subdivision Jurisdiction e m b pgr Status Timeline ov a G na on Fe a m U i pr i C d t y M a t Tr i Im nd n a Loa m r o o ior i r e t ound d a ut P e t gr r t A Fe ge s e i V nde D U Ashford 14379 Dry Ridge Road Montgomery County X Complete 1st Quarter 2012 Aspen Hill 14840 Saddlebrook Park Montgomery County X Complete 3rd Quarter 2011 Aspen Hill 14914 Bel Pre Montgomery County X Complete 3rd Quarter 2012 Bells Mill 14083 Seven Locks Road Montgomery County X Complete 2nd Quarter 2013 Bells Mill 34973 Twinbrook Montgomery County Complete 4th Quarter 2011 Bells Mill 34978 Twinbrook Montgomery County Complete 3rd Quarter 2011 Bells Mill 69179 Beverly Farms, Hunting Hill, Potomac, Rockville Montgomery County Complete 3rd Quarter 2011 Bells Mill 69180 Beverly Farms, Potomac, Rockville Montgomery County Complete 3rd Quarter 2011 Bells Mill 69181 Bells Mill Montgomery County X Complete 1st Quarter 2015 Bells Mill 69181 Potomac and Hunting Hill and David Talyor Model Basin Montgomery County Complete 4th Quarter 2011 Bells Mill 69185 Beverly Farms, Hunting Hill, Rockville Montgomery County Complete 3rd Quarter 2011 Rolling Green Way URD Subdivision around Tuckahoe Way and Bells Mill Road 14081 Montgomery County X Complete 3rd Quarter 2014 Lake Breeze Dr North Potomac, MD Bethesda 14081 Lancelot Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Avenue Line Find the Stop at Or Nearest the Point Where You Will Get on the Bus
    How to use this timetable Effective 6-6-21 ➤ Use the map to find the stops closest to where you will get on and off the bus. ➤ Select the schedule (Weekday, Saturday, Sunday) for when you will L2 travel. Along the top of the schedule, Connecticut Avenue Line find the stop at or nearest the point where you will get on the bus. Follow that column down to the time you want to leave. ➤ Use the same method to find the times the bus is scheduled to arrive at the stop where you will get off the bus. Serves these locations- ➤ If the bus stop is not listed, use the Brinda servicio a estas time shown for the bus stop before it ubicaciones as the time to wait at the stop. ➤ The end-of-the-line or last stop is listed l Chevy Chase Circle in ALL CAPS on the schedule. l Van Ness-UDC station l Cleveland Park station Cómo Usar este Horario l Woodley Park station ➤ Use este mapa para localizar las paradas más cercanas a donde se l Adams Morgan subirá y bajará del autobús. l Dupont Circle ➤ Seleccione el horario (Entre semana, l Farragut Square sábado, domingo) de cuando viajará. A lo largo de la parte superior del horario, localice la parada o el punto más cercano a la parada en la que se subirá al autobús. Siga esa columna hacia abajo hasta la hora en la que desee salir. ➤ Utilice el mismo método para localizar las horas en que el autobús está programado para llegar a la parada en donde desea bajarse del autobús.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • Boards, Commissions, and Committees
    Boards, Commissions, and Committees Note: This is a listing of Federal boards, centers, commissions, councils, panels, study groups, task forces, etc., not listed elsewhere in the Manual, which were established by congressional or Presidential action, whose functions are not strictly limited to the internal operations of a parent department or agency, and which are authorized to publish documents in the Federal Register. While the editors have attempted to compile a complete and accurate listing, suggestions for improving coverage of this guide are welcome. Please address your comments to the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408. Phone, 202±523±5230. Federal advisory committees, as defined by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. app.), have not been included here. A complete listing of these committees can be found in the Twenty-third Annual Report of the President on Federal Advisory Committees for Fiscal Year 1994. For further information on Federal advisory committees and this report, contact the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, General Services Building (CAM), Room 7114, Washington, DC 20405. Phone, 202±273±3556. Administrative Committee of the Appalachian Regional Commission Federal Register 1666 Connecticut Avenue NW., National Archives, Washington, DC Washington, DC 20235. Phone, 202± 20408. Phone, 202±523±4534. 884±7799. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 1 800 K Street NW., Suite 450 South, Washington, DC 20575. Phone, 202± 1331 F Street NW., Suite 1000, 653±5540. Washington, DC 20004±1111. Phone, 202±272±5434. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Arctic Research Commission 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 809, Washington, DC 20004.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction & Resurfacing of New Hampshire Avenue
    Reconstruction & Resurfacing of New Hampshire Avenue Construction District Department of Transportation (DDOT) August 29, 2012 1 Stakeholders Meeting Agenda Welcome Planning Study Overview Presented By: Richard Kenney Construction Project Overview Presented By: AECOM- Joseph Chukwueke Public Involvement Effort Updates Presented By: Capitol Services Management, Inc.- Ian Swain 2 New Hampshire Avenue Reconstruction/Resurfacing Project • Historical Overview & Perspective • Construction Details • Project Schedule 3 Project Boundaries Reconstruction Resurfacing 4 Project Goals and Objectives DDOT’s New Hampshire Avenue Project seeks to: • Improve Safety, Accessibility and Mobility • Reconstruct/Resurface deteriorated pavement along New Hampshire Avenue • Enhance the Community Streetscape through a design that is safe, sustainable and enriching 5 Historical Overview Project Development Initial scope of work included resurfacing of New Hampshire Avenue from Virginia Avenue to Washington Circle & Reconstruction of New Hampshire Avenue from Washington Circle to Dupont Circle – February 2005 Preliminary plans (30%) submitted – January 2006 Washington Circle Pedestrian-Vehicle Traffic Study was added to the scope The study was completed with development of two alternatives for crosswalk layout in Washington Circle after meetings with NPS, ANC, and DDOT The recommendations from this study were incorporated into this project Intermediate Plans (65%) submitted – March 2010 The New Hampshire Avenue between M Street and Washington Circle made two-
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Convention Center Washington, District of Columbia
    Washington Convention Center Washington, D.C. Project Type: Other Case No: C033012 Year: 2003 SUMMARY Located in the Mount Vernon Square neighborhood of Washington, D.C., the new six-level convention center is the largest building in the city, covering six blocks and rising 130 feet (39.6 meters) from the ground at its tallest point—higher than most buildings in the height-constrained city. This massive, 2.3 million-square-foot (213,670-square-meter), 38,000-ton steel, limestone, and glass structure features five exhibit halls, 725,000 square feet (67,352 square meters) of exhibit space, 150,000 square feet (13,935 square meters) of meeting space, a 52,000-square-foot (4,830-square-meter) ballroom, a 36,000-square-foot (3,344-square-meter) area for registration, and approximately 44,000 square feet (4,087 square meters) of restaurants and shops. The convention center is among the ten largest in the nation, and both the Washington Monument and the Sears Tower in Chicago would be able to fit inside the structure if laid on their sides. FEATURES The building is constructed to appear as three separate structures in order to enable it to fit more seamlessly into the surrounding neighborhood. Due to site constraints, 2 million tons (2,002,000 metric tons) of earth were removed, enabling one-fifth of the structure to be placed underground. The project was funded through the taxation of area hotels and restaurants, allowing the center to be built in the face of other crucial city needs. Washington Convention Center Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]