Form of Service for the Commemoration of Benefactors
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 I I
INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. -
The Full Story of United States V. Smith, Americaâ•Žs Most Important
Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 1 Issue 2 November 2012 The Full Story of United States v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case Joel H. Samuels Follow this and additional works at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social History Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons ISSN: 2168-7951 Recommended Citation Joel H. Samuels, The Full Story of United States v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case, 1 PENN. ST. J.L. & INT'L AFF. 320 (2012). Available at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol1/iss2/7 The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs is a joint publication of Penn State’s School of Law and School of International Affairs. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2012 VOLUME 1 NO. 2 THE FULL STORY OF UNITED STATES V. SMITH, AMERICA’S MOST IMPORTANT PIRACY CASE Joel H. Samuels* INTRODUCTION Many readers would be surprised to learn that a little- explored nineteenth-century piracy case continues to spawn core arguments in modern-day civil cases for damages ranging from environmental degradation in Latin America to apartheid-era investment in South Africa, as well as criminal trials of foreign terrorists.1 That case, United States v. Smith,2 decided by the United * Associate Professor, Deputy Director, Rule of Law Collaborative, University of South Carolina School of Law. -
Thought, Word and Deed in the Mid-Tudor Commonwealth : Sir Thomas Smith and Sir William Cecil in the Reign of Edward VI
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1979 Thought, word and deed in the mid-Tudor Commonwealth : Sir Thomas Smith and Sir William Cecil in the reign of Edward VI Ann B. Clark Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Economic History Commons, and the European History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Clark, Ann B., "Thought, word and deed in the mid-Tudor Commonwealth : Sir Thomas Smith and Sir William Cecil in the reign of Edward VI" (1979). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2776. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2772 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. / AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Ann B. Clarke for the Master of Arts in History presented 18 May 1979. l I· Title: Thought, Word and Deed in the Mid-Tudor Commonwealth: Sir Thomas Smith:and Sir William Cecil in the Reign of Edward VI. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COlfiMITTEE: Ann Weikel, Chairman Charles LeGuin · Michael Reardon This thesis examines the general economic and intel- lectual climate of the mid-Tudor Commonwealth as a background for a specific study of the financial reforms instituted by Edward VI's government while the Duke of Northumberland controlled the Privy Council. The philosophy behind these measures parallels the principles expressed in A Discourse of the Commonweal of this Realm of England, a treatise written in 1549 by Sir Thomas Smith, Secretary to King Edward. -
Commemoration of Benefactors 1823
A FORM FOR TH E COMMEMORATION OF BENEFACTORS, TO BE USED IN THE CHAPEL OF TH E College of S t. Margaret and St. Bernard, COMMONLY CALLED Queens’ College, Cambridge. CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, BY J. SMITH. M.DCCC.XX.III. THE SOCIETY OF QUEENS’ COLLEGE. 1823. President. H enry G odfrey, D. D. ( Vice-Chancellor). Foundation Fellows. J ohn L odge H ubbersty, M. D. G eorge H ew itt, B. D. Charles F arish, B. D. W illiam M andell, B. D. T homas Beevor, B. D. G eorge Cornelius G orham, B. D. John T oplis, B. D. J oseph J ee, M. A. Samuel Carr, M. A. J ohn Baines G raham, M. A. H enry V enn, M. A. J oseph D ewe, M. A. J oshua K ing, M. A. T homas T attershall, M. A. Samuel F ennell, B. A. Edwards’ By-Fellow. John V incent T hompson, M.A., F.A.S. A FORM FOR TH E COMMEMORATION OF BENEFACTORS, TO BE USED IN THE CHAPEL OF TH E College of St. Margaret and St. Bernard, COMMONLY CALLED Queens’ College, Cambridge. LET the whole Society assemble in the College Chapel, on the day after the end of each Term; and let the Commemoration Service be conducted in the following manner; as required by the Statutes, (Chapter 25. ‘ De celebranda memoria Benefactorum’ — ¶ First, the Lesson, E cclesiasticus X L IV , shall be read.—¶ Then, the Sermon shall be preached, by some person a appointed by the President; at the conclusion o f which, the names o f the Foundresses, and of other Benefactors, shall be recited: — I. -
Descendants of John Smith, Sr
Descendants of John Smith, Sr. Generation No. 1 1. COLONEL JOHN1 SMITH, SR. was born 1698 in England, and died 1776 in Smithland, Rockingham, VA. He married MARGARET 1719 in Ulster, Ireland. She was born 1700 in Holland, and died 1774 in Smithland, Rockingham, VA. Notes for COLONEL JOHN SMITH, SR.: "Capt. John Smith born 1698, in England, settled with his parents in Province of Ulster, Ireland; is said to have been a Colonel of the British Army, and married in 1719 to Margaret, immigrated to America about 1730 with his wife & children, settled, 1st in Chester Co. PA about 1740 moved with the McDowells and others, to what is now Augusta Co. VA, then Orange Co. and on 26 Jun 1740 proved the importance of himself, his wife Margaret, & their sons Abraham, Henry, Daniel, John & Joseph from the colony of Pennsylvania 26 Jun 1742, John Smith qualified at Orange Court House as Captain of the Militia for Augusta Co. As a protection against the inroads of Indians. He had several crude forts, or block houses, constructed in the Valley, one of which was in the county of Botetourt, on the James River, where Pattonsburg was subsequently located. These forts became the scene of memorable events. Capt. John Smith, with 17 men, held a fort called Vaux’s Fort or Fort Vause/Vass/Vance/ Vaus, which was located on the headwaters of the Roanoke River, about 10 miles from where Christianburg now stands. This fort was attacked by a large number of French soldiers & Shawnee Indians. After a brave resistance for 3 days, the garrison agreed to surrender the fort, upon stipulation allowing them to return to their homes. -
H.A.M. Smith Papers, Ca. 1744-1922 SCHS# 1102.00
H.A.M. Smith papers, ca. 1744-1922 SCHS# 1102.00 Creator: Smith, Henry A.M. Description: 24.25 linear ft. (8 boxes + 5 flat file drawers) Biographical/Historical Note: Charleston, S.C. judge, historian, and plantation owner. He was the son of John Julius Pringle Smith and Elizabeth Middleton Smith (b. 1822), daughter of Henry Augustus Middleton (1793-1887). His historical writings about South Carolina, drawn from manuscript sources, were published in the South Carolina Historical Magazine from 1900 to 1928 and include a series entitled "The Baronies of South Carolina" (April 1910-Jan. 1917). Henry A.M. (Augustus Middleton) Smith was born in 1853 and died in 1924. Scope and Content: Papers consist of abstracts of property records and other material, research notes, indexes, transcriptions of documents, maps and plats, and other items. Also included are papers (1819- 1871) of William H. Lowndes (d. 1865). Abstracts include typewritten (on half-sheets) abstracts of articles and notices (1731-1793) in the South Carolina Gazette and the Daily Advertiser mainly concerning shipping in Charleston (S.C.) and North Carolina; abstracts (in 4 bound volumes) of property records in the Charleston County Register of Mesne Conveyance office books A-D, with an index; and abstracts of records of the British Public Records Office. There are notes for a history of Goose Creek (S.C.), with related abstracts, as well as other research notes (some on index cards) and related correspondence, and notes on Smith family genealogy. A small bound volume contains a consolidated index to information (ca. 1680-ca. 1800) on selected geographical locations and Indian tribes in South Carolina as found in the South Carolina Secretary of State land grant books, Smith's copy of land grant books, Journals of the Grand Council of South Carolina, the Shaftsbury Papers, "Warrants for Land, 1671-1711," the Charleston County R.M.C. -
RECORDS of the LUMLEYS of LUMLEY CASTLE K 7
From the Library of GEORGE CHARLES WILLIAMSON, Burgh House^ Hampstead. Shelf i9°7- mdxmii bpa>^ JO- Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/b28035999 RECORDS OF THE LUMLEYS OF LUMLEY CASTLE k 7 r ” t > f' t' f. i I He d RECORDS OF THE LUMLEYS OF LUMLEY CASTLE BY EDITH MILNER C EDITED BY EDITH BENHAM LONDON GEORGE BELL AND SONS 1904 i.sa ^T- (l-S'l ; !_J^' CHISWICK PRESS: CHARLES WHITTINGHAM AND CO. TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON. PREFACE HRONICLERS are useful people, and are not as plentiful as they might be. Many interesting stories are thus lost, and tradition will perhaps in the near future become literally a thing of the past. It was due to the fact that one member of the Lumley family had a tenacious memory that this book came to be written. These memories were gathered to- gether, and soon grew into a considerable record. It then became necessary, if the book was to be of any public value, to verify the traditions. Family papers were put in order, searched and translated. The task outgrew the modest capacities of the author, and then the editor came to the rescue. After translating the family papers, searching the British Museum and the Record Offices, besides ob- taining access to vMuable papers in other families, notably those belonging to the .See of Winchester, Miss Benham was able to give the book value and authority; and if it should appeal to the thoughtful and learned, the thanks of the family and the author are due to her for the invaluable service she has rendered. -
The Full Story of U.S. V. Smith, America's Most Important Piracy Case
University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Law School 2012 The ulF l Story of U.S. v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case Joel H. Samuels University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/law_facpub Part of the International Law Commons, Rule of Law Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Joel H. Samuels, The Full Story of United States v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case, 1 Penn. St. J.L. & Int'l Aff. 320 (2012). This Article is brought to you by the Law School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 1 | Issue 2 November 2012 The ulF l Story of United States v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case Joel H. Samuels ISSN: 2168-7951 Recommended Citation Joel H. Samuels, The Full Story of United States v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case, 1 Penn. St. J.L. & Int'l Aff. 320 (2012). Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol1/iss2/7 The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs is a joint publication of Penn State’s School of Law and School of International Affairs. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2012 VOLUME 1 NO. 2 THE FULL STORY OF UNITED STATES V. SMITH, AMERICA’S MOST IMPORTANT PIRACY CASE Joel H. Samuels* INTRODUCTION Many readers would be surprised to learn that a little- explored nineteenth-century piracy case continues to spawn core arguments in modern-day civil cases for damages ranging from environmental degradation in Latin America to apartheid-era investment in South Africa, as well as criminal trials of foreign terrorists.1 That case, United States v. -
TUTOR: Sir Thomas Smith (1513-1577)
“SHAKESPEARE’S” TUTOR: Sir Thomas Smith (1513-1577) Stephanie Hopkins Hughes ❦ Prospero: Knowing I loved my books, he furnished me, From my own library, with volumes that I prize above my dukedom. The Tempest: I.2 HAT did Shakespeare know? As so many scholars have shown–– whether or not they have accepted their own abundant proofs––the evidence reveals a writer fluent in Latin and classical Greek (Green- wood 93, 98), in contemporary French (Henry V:III.3, Shaheen 361) and Italian (Grillo 125-6); one who had read and remembered a great deal of history, both the history of his own nation (Bullough 3.xi, Shaheen 360) and that of ancient times (Cantor 10); and although he didn’t always reflect what he knew in his plays exactly the way it happened, much must be allowed for the pur- poses of drama. He was familiar with the Bible, particularly the Geneva Bible (Shaheen 39) and the Book of Common Prayer (51). He was familiar with the works of ancient philoso- phers, Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero (Baldwin 412). He was familiar with the ancient Greek dramatists as with the Romans Plautus, Juvenal, Cicero and Virgil (Churton Collins as qtd. in Greenwood 93, 98-9); with Terence and Seneca, (Muir 18, 255-7); with his Continental contemporaries, Ronsard (Lewis 170), Ariosto (Grillo 129), and Tasso (131). He was high- ly trained in techniques of rhetoric (Joseph 44-5). He was so highly trained in the law that, as a matter of course, he communicated easily in metaphors couched in abstruse legal termi- nology (Greenwood 375-6). -
Teaching Natural Philosophy and Mathematics at Oxford and Cambridge 1500 – 1570
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Teaching Natural Philosophy and Mathematics at Oxford and Cambridge 1500 – 1570 James Hannam Pembroke College, University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated in the text. The syllabus in natural philosophy and mathematics was radically changed in the course of the sixteenth century with new subjects, textbooks and methods introduced. Education became more practical and less dependent on medieval antecedents. Printing technology improved textbooks and made it possible to replace them with newer versions. Following sweeping syllabus reform around 1500, the Cambridge Master of Arts course was heavily slanted towards humanism. The old scholastic textbooks were rejected and replaced with modern authors. The purpose of natural philosophy was explicitly to illuminate the providential work of the creator, especially through natural history (a newly developing subject in the sixteenth century thanks to newly translated and promulgated Greek texts) where examples of God’s work were there for all to see. Oxford remained wedded to scholastic texts although the trivium was reformed along humanistic lines. Cromwell’s visitors in 1535 outlawed scholasticism by decree but gave little indication of the alternative (their white list stipulating only Aristotle). The solution adopted by the Oxford masters was to import the Cambridge syllabus and textbooks wholesale. When the evangelical regime of Edward VI reformed the universities in 1549, the humanist natural philosophy syllabus was adjudged appropriate, especially those parts promoted by Philip Melanchthon at the University of Wittenberg. -
The Heads of Religious Houses England and Wales III, 1377-1540 Edited by David M
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86508-1 - The Heads of Religious Houses England and Wales III, 1377-1540 Edited by David M. Smith Frontmatter More information THE HEADS OF RELIGIOUS HOUSES ENGLAND AND WALES 1377–1540 This final volume of The Heads of Religious Houses: England and Wales takes the lists of monastic superiors from 1377 to the dissolution of the monastic houses ending in 1540 and so concludes a reference work covering 600 years of monastic history. In addition to surviving monastic archives, record sources have also been provided by episcopal and papal registers, governmental archives, court records, and private, family and estate collections. Full references are given for establishing the dates and outline of the career of each abbot or prior, abbess or prioress, when known. The lists are arranged by order: the Benedictine houses (independent; dependencies; and alien priories); the Cluniacs; the Grandmontines; the Cistercians; the Carthusians; the Augustinian canons; the Premonstratensians; the Gilbertine order; the Trinitarian houses; the Bonhommes; and the nuns. An intro- duction discusses the use and history of the lists and examines critically the sources on which they are based. david m. smith is Professor Emeritus, University of York. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86508-1 - The Heads of Religious Houses England and Wales III, 1377-1540 Edited by David M. Smith Frontmatter More information THE HEADS OF RELIGIOUS HOUSES ENGLAND AND WALES III 1377–1540 Edited by DAVID M. SMITH Professor Emeritus, University of York © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86508-1 - The Heads of Religious Houses England and Wales III, 1377-1540 Edited by David M. -
INTRODUCTION Late in the Year 1553, at the Peak of a Distinguished
INTRODUCTION Late in the year 1553, at the peak of a distinguished academic career, Peter Martyr Vermigli departed hastily from England en route to Stras- bourg and Zurich. The great Italian reformer had served for six years as Regius professor of divinity in the University of Oxford at the per- sonal invitation of Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury. While at Oxford, Vermigli had participated in a critical disputation on the Eucharist, assisted Cranmer in the revision of the Book of Common Prayer (1552), and served on a royal commission for the reform of the canon law. Following the death of Edward VI, the course of the Reformation in England was suddenly reversed. During the ensuing persecution of Protestants under Queen Mary, numerous English scholars soon fol- lowed Vermigli to Strasbourg and thence to Zurich where they contin- ued to hear his lectures and to promote with him the cause of reli- gious reform throughout Europe. Several of these Marian exiles in Zurich were to become prominent players in the Elizabethan Settle- ment; among them were no less than six future bishops, a clutch of Privy Councillors, and some of the leading lights of humanist, classical scholarship in the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. Of twenty- three episcopal appointments made in the period 1559–1562,four- teen were returned Marian exiles.1 Among Elizabeth’s newly appointed bishops six had been Bullinger’s guests at Zurich: John Jewel of Salis- bury, Richard Cox of Ely, John Parkhurst of Norwich, Edwin Sandys of Worcester, James Pilkington of Durham, Robert Horne of Winchester.