Strategy for the Adoption of the Euro in Croatia in Euro the of Adoption the Strategy For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strategy for the Adoption of the Euro in Croatia in Euro the of Adoption the Strategy For STRATEGY FORSTRATEGY THE ADOPTION OF THE EURO IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA CROATIAN NATIONAL BANK STRATEGY FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE EURO IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA April 2018 STRATEGY FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE EURO IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Contents Main highlights .................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ............................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 11 2 The appropriateness of the euro for Croatia under the optimum currency area theory .................................................................................................................................. 13 3 Cost-benefit analysis of the adoption of the euro in Croatia ................................... 21 3.1 Benefits of euro adoption .......................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Elimination of the currency risk from the economy ...............................................21 3.1.2 Reduction of the borrowing costs of domestic sectors ........................................24 3.1.3 The reduction of the risk of the outbreak of a currency and banking crisis ...26 3.1.4 Lower transaction costs................................................................................................... 27 3.1.5 Stimulus to international trade and investments ...................................................28 3.1.6 Participation in the allocation of the Eurosystem’s monetary income .............30 3.1.7 Access to financial assistance mechanisms for euro area ....................................31 3.2 The costs of euro adoption ........................................................................................ 32 3.2.1 The loss of an independent monetary policy ...........................................................32 3.2.2 Increase in the price level due to conversion ...........................................................38 3.2.3 The risk of excessive capital inflows and accumulation of macroeconomic imbalances ..........................................................................................................................41 3.2.4 One-off changeover costs ..............................................................................................42 3.2.5 One-off costs of Croatian National Bank joining the Eurosystem ......................43 3.2.6 Participation in providing financial assistance to other Member States .........44 3.3 The total cost-benefit assessment of the adoption of the euro ........................... 45 4 The process of euro adoption ....................................................................................... 49 4.1 Participation in the Exchange Rate Mechanism II .................................................. 49 4.1.1 Support for joining the Exchange Rate Mechanism II ...........................................50 4.1.1.1 Income convergence (real convergence) ....................................................50 4.1.1.2 Price convergence ...............................................................................................52 4.1.1.3 Presence of macroeconomic imbalances ....................................................55 4.1.2 Procedures and main features of participation in the ERM II ..............................56 4.2 Fulfilment of the nominal convergence criteria ..................................................... 58 4.2.1 Setting the criteria ............................................................................................................58 4.2.2 Croatia’s performance according to nominal convergence criteria so far ......59 4.3 Legal convergence....................................................................................................... 61 4.4 Receiving confirmation by EU institutions on the fulfilment of all requirements for the adoption of the euro ...................................................................................... 63 5 Activities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia and the CNB in the period until the adoption of the euro ......................................................................................... 64 5.1 Implementation of economic policy with a view to reducing economic vulnerabilities and meeting convergence criteria ................................................. 64 5.1.1 Implementation of economic policy with a view to reducing economic vulnerabilities .....................................................................................................................64 Government of the Republic of Croatia and the Croatian National Bank STRATEGY FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE EURO IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA iii 5.1.2 Making efforts to meet nominal convergence criteria ..........................................67 5.2 Application of additional rules and agreements of euro area Member States . 68 5.2.1 Rules of the European economic governance framework applicable to the euro area ..............................................................................................................................68 5.2.2 Accession to the banking union ...................................................................................70 5.3 Operational adjustments of the CNB related to joining the Eurosystem ........... 72 5.3.1 Adjustment of monetary policy instruments ...........................................................72 5.3.2 Adjustments in cash transactions ................................................................................73 5.3.3 Adjustments in the payment system ..........................................................................74 5.3.4 Financial adjustments due to the accession to the Eurosystem ........................74 5.4 Other adjustments in the context of euro adoption .............................................. 76 5.4.1 Measures to prevent the rise in consumer prices due to currency conversion . 76 5.4.2 Legal, accounting and IT preparations .......................................................................77 5.4.3 Adjustments in the area of statistics ...........................................................................78 6 Guidelines for economic policy after the adoption of the euro .............................. 79 6.1 The importance of prudent fiscal and structural policies ..................................... 79 6.2 The role of macroprudential policy in mitigating macroeconomic and financial risks ................................................................................................................................ 81 7 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 83 References ........................................................................................................................... 86 Legal sources ...................................................................................................................... 91 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 92 Abbreviations for Member States ................................................................................... 93 Government of the Republic of Croatia and the Croatian National Bank iv STRATEGY FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE EURO IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Main highlights The benefits of the adoption of the euro in Croatia exceed the costs. While benefits are permanent and relatively considerable, costs are predominantly low and one-off. The adoption of the euro will reduce the risks to financial and macroeconomic stability and positively affect financing conditions, thus accelerating growth and strengthening the economy’s resilience. All new EU Member States of comparable size have therefore already introduced the euro. The adoption of the euro eliminates currency risk for citizens, corporations and the government. It eliminates the possibility of a currency crisis and diminishes the risk of potentially expensive banking and balance-of-payments crises. The new financial architecture of the euro area strengthens protective mechanisms in case of economic disturbances. Interest rates and transaction costs will decrease. The elimination of the currency risk will favourably affect the country’s risk premium, while regulatory costs for banks will substantially reduce, having a positive effect on interest rate levels. In addition, citizens and corporations will save on currency conversion transactions and charges for cross-border payments in euro. The lowering of transaction costs and greater price comparability will spur international trade and tourism. Investments are expected to be positively affected. Lower interest rates will boost the competitiveness of domestic corporations and provide additional impetus to investments and employment, while the elimination of currency risk will positively affect the confidence of international investors in Croatia and thus contribute to attracting foreign direct investments. The loss of independent monetary and exchange rate policy will not represent a substantial cost for Croatia. High credit and deposit euroisation and dominance of foreign-owned banks in the domestic banking system have narrowed the
Recommended publications
  • Press Release Changes to the List of Euro Foreign Exchange Reference
    3 December 2010 PRESS RELEASE CHANGES TO THE LIST OF EURO FOREIGN EXCHANGE REFERENCE RATES: ISRAELI SHEKEL ADDED, ESTONIAN KROON REMOVED On 1 January 2011, Estonia will become the 17th Member State of the European Union to adopt the euro. The European Central Bank (ECB) will thus stop publishing euro reference exchange rates for the Estonian kroon (EEK) from this date. Moreover, the ECB has decided to compute and publish, as of 3 January 2011, the euro reference rates for the Israeli shekel on a daily basis. As a consequence, as of 3 January 2011, the ECB will compute and publish euro foreign exchange reference rates for the following list of currencies on a daily basis: AUD Australian dollar BGN Bulgarian lev BRL Brazilian real CAD Canadian dollar CHF Swiss franc CNY Chinese yuan renminbi CZK Czech koruna DKK Danish krone GBP Pound sterling HKD Hong Kong dollar HRK Croatian kuna HUF Hungarian forint IDR Indonesian rupiah ILS Israeli shekel INR Indian rupee ISK Icelandic krona JPY Japanese yen KRW South Korean won LTL Lithuanian litas LVL Latvian lats MXN Mexican peso 2 MYR Malaysian ringgit NOK Norwegian krone NZD New Zealand dollar PHP Philippine peso PLN Polish zloty RON New Romanian leu RUB Russian rouble SEK Swedish krona SGD Singapore dollar THB Thai baht TRY New Turkish lira USD US dollar ZAR South African rand The current procedure for the computation and publication of the foreign exchange reference rates will also apply to the currency that is to be added to the list: The reference rates are based on the daily concertation procedure between central banks within and outside the European System of Central Banks, which normally takes place at 2.15 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Market Pressure on the Croatian Kuna
    EXCHANGE MARKET PRESSURE ON THE CROATIAN KUNA Srđan Tatomir* Professional article** Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb and UDC 336.748(497.5) University of Amsterdam JEL F31 Abstract Currency crises exert strong pressure on currencies often causing costly economic adjustment. A measure of exchange market pressure (EMP) gauges the severity of such tensions. Measuring EMP is important for monetary authorities that manage exchange rates. It is also relevant in academic research that studies currency crises. A precise EMP measure is therefore important and this paper re-examines the measurement of EMP on the Croatian kuna. It improves it by considering intervention data and thresholds that ac- count for the EMP distribution. It also tests the robustness of weights. A discussion of the results demonstrates a modest improvement over the previous measure and concludes that the new EMP on the Croatian kuna should be used in future research. Key words: exchange market pressure, currency crisis, Croatia 1 Introduction In an era of increasing globalization and economic interdependence, fixed and pegged exchange rate regimes are ever more exposed to the danger of currency crises. Integrated financial markets have enabled speculators to execute attacks more swiftly and deliver devastating blows to individual economies. They occur when there is an abnormally large international excess supply of a currency which forces monetary authorities to take strong counter-measures (Weymark, 1998). The EMS crisis of 1992/93 and the Asian crisis of 1997/98 are prominent historical examples. Recently, though, the financial crisis has led to severe pressure on the Hungarian forint and the Icelandic kronor, demonstrating how pressure in the foreign exchange market may cause costly economic adjustment.
    [Show full text]
  • Corresponding Values of the Thresholds of Directives 2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC and 2009/81/EC, of the European Parliament and of the Council (2015/C 418/01)
    16.12.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 418/1 II (Information) INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION Corresponding values of the thresholds of Directives 2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC and 2009/81/EC, of the European Parliament and of the Council (2015/C 418/01) The corresponding values in the national currencies other than euros of the thresholds of Directives 2004/17/EC (1), 2004/18/EC (2) and 2009/81/EC (3) are the following: EUR 80 000 BGN New Bulgarian Lev 156 464 CZK Czech Koruna 2 184 400 DKK Danish Krone 596 520 GBP Pound Sterling 62 842 HRK Croatian Kuna 610 024 HUF Hungarian Forint 24 549 600 PLN New Polish Zloty 333 992 RON New Romanian Leu 355 632 SEK Swedish Krona 731 224 EUR 135 000 BGN New Bulgarian Lev 264 033 CZK Czech Koruna 3 686 175 DKK Danish Krone 1 006 628 GBP Pound Sterling 106 047 HRK Croatian Kuna 1 029 416 HUF Hungarian Forint 41 427 450 PLN New Polish Zloty 563 612 RON New Romanian Leu 600 129 SEK Swedish Krona 1 233 941 (1) OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1. (2) OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114. (3) OJ L 216, 20.8.2009, p. 76. C 418/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 16.12.2015 EUR 209 000 BGN New Bulgarian Lev 408 762 CZK Czech Koruna 5 706 745 DKK Danish Krone 1 558 409 GBP Pound Sterling 164 176 HRK Croatian Kuna 1 593 688 HUF Hungarian Forint 64 135 830 PLN New Polish Zloty 872 554 RON New Romanian Leu 929 089 SEK Swedish Krona 1 910 323 EUR 418 000 BGN New Bulgarian Lev 817 524 CZK Czech Koruna 11 413 790 DKK
    [Show full text]
  • The UK in the European Union: in Brief
    The UK in the European Union: in brief Standard Note: SN/IA/7060 Last updated: 15 December 2014 Author: Vaughne Miller Section International Affairs and Defence Section The European Economic Community (EEC) was established by the Treaty of Rome in 1957 and the UK joined the EEC in 1973. This Note looks at some of the main events of the UK’s membership of the EEC/EC/EU. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public. Contents Introduction 3 1951– Treaty of Paris 3 1955 – Messina Conference 3 1957 – Treaty of Rome 3 1959 – UK joins European Free Trade Association 3 1961- UK bid to join EEC 3 1967 – French veto of UK EEC membership 3 1969 – Third UK application 3 1973 – UK joins the EEC 4 1975 – UK Referendum on EU membership 4 1977 – First UK Presidency 4 1979 - European Monetary System 4 1981 – EU enlargement 4 1984 – UK Budget Rebate 4 1986
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Stability 15, July 2015
    No. 15 Year 8 VII 2015 Financial Stability No. 15, Zagreb, July 2015 PUBLISHER Croatian National Bank Publishing Department Trg hrvatskih velikana 3, 10002 Zagreb Phone: +385 1 45 64 555 Contact phone: +385 1 45 65 006 Fax: +385 1 45 64 687 www.hnb.hr Those using data from this publication are requested to cite the source. ISSN 1847-0017 (online) Contents Introductory remarks 5 Overall assessment of the main risks and challenges to financial stability policy 7 Macroeconomic environment 9 Box 1 Redesigning the systemic risk map 17 Government sector 19 Household sector 23 Box 2 Interest rate risk in the Republic of Croatia 28 Real estate 32 Box 3 Preliminary research of residential real estate market liquidity as a determinant of price dynamics 34 Non-financial corporate sector 37 Box 4 Forecasting the probability of default of non-financial corporations by means of sectoral micro models with macroeconomic variables 42 Banking sector 45 Stress testing of credit institutions 53 Introductory remarks Finance plays a key role in the allocation of resources, i.e. the Services Supervisory Agency (HANFA), which are responsible process of transforming savings into investments, and there- for the regulation and supervision of non-banking financial in- fore into economic growth and an increase in the overall level stitutions. Furthermore, owing to the high degree to which the of social welfare. At the same time, because financial stabili- banking system is internationalised, as reflected in the foreign ty is based on the confidence of financial market participants, ownership of the largest banks, the CNB also cooperates with it large ly depends in turn on their perceptions and behaviour, the home regulatory authorities and central banks of parent fi- which are subject to cyclical swings.
    [Show full text]
  • Mintage of Irish Euro Coins
    Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Central Bank of Ireland Currency Centre MINTAGE OF IRISH EURO COINS FIGURES COMPLETED UP TO 31 DECEMBER 2019 COINAGE DATED 2002 – 2019 2002 2003 2004 2005 20061 20072 2008 2009 1 cent 404,340,000 77,900,000 174,830,000 128,550,000 110,930,000 163,800,000 46,120,000 52,170,000 2 cent 354,640,000 177,290,000 143,000,000 74,650,000 26,550,000 200,940,000 35,800,000 44,250,000 5 cent 456,270,000 48,350,000 82,330,000 56,510,000 89,770,000 136,210,000 61,870,000 11,300,000 10 cent 275,910,000 133,820,000 36,770,000 7,150,000 9,600,000 76,990,000 56,530,000 11,740,000 20 cent 234,580,000 57,140,000 32,420,000 40,490,000 10,360,000 34,470,000 45,970,000 5,390,000 50 cent 144,140,000 11,810,000 6,750,000 17,310,000 7,460,000 8,680,000 1,190,000 2,900,000 1 Euro 135,140,000 2,520,000 1,630,000 6,820,000 4,000,000 5,700,000 2,560,000 3,290,000 2 Euro 90,590,000 2,630,000 3,740,000 13,470,000 5,080,000 12,110,0003 6,080,000 1,010,0004 Total 2,095,610,000 511,460,000 481,470,000 344,950,000 263,750,000 638,900,000 256,120,000 132,050,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20156 20168 2017 2018 2019 1 cent 10,920,000 40,950,000 61,370,000 61,464,000 35,131,000 40,000 210,000 9,170 19980 - 2 cent 3,470,000 4,700,000 11,910,000 34,799,000 3,112,000 40,000 160,000 9,120 19990 - 5 cent 990,000 990,000 1,020,000 1,042,000 1,055,000 1,100,000 80,000 782,980 30,066,180 30,000,000 10 cent 1,050,000 920,000 1,060,000 936,000 1,080,000 9,160,000 2,280,000 189,255 179,800 10,000,000 20 cent 1,000,000 1,140,000 970,000 1,284,000 1,183,000
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Monetary Union: Past, Present and Future
    CASE Reports The Economic and Monetary Union: Past, Present and Future Marek Dabrowski No. 497 (2019) This article is based on a policy contribution prepared for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament (ECON) as an input for the Monetary Dialogue of 28 January 2019 between ECON and the President of the ECB (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/econ/monetary-dialogue.html). Copyright remains with the European Parliament at all times. “CASE Reports” is a continuation of “CASE Network Studies & Analyses” series. Keywords: European Union, Economic and Monetary Union, common currency area, monetary policy, fiscal policy JEL codes: E58, E62, E63, F33, F45, H62, H63 © CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, 2019 DTP: Tandem Studio EAN: 9788371786808 Publisher: CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research al. Jana Pawła II 61, office 212, 01-031 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (+48) 22 206 29 00, fax: (+48) 22 206 29 01 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.case-researc.eu Contents List of Figures 4 List of Tables 5 List of Abbreviations 6 Author 7 Abstract 8 Executive Summary 9 1. Introduction 11 2. History of the common currency project and its implementation 13 2.1. Historical and theoretic background 13 2.2. From the Werner Report to the Maastricht Treaty (1969–1992) 15 2.3. Preparation phase (1993–1998) 16 2.4. The first decade (1999–2008) 17 2.5. The second decade (2009–2018) 19 3. EA performance in its first twenty years 22 3.1. Inflation, exchange rate and the share in global official reserves 22 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation-From-Roundatable-4-Out
    Central Europe & eurozone Saturday, 6 October 2018 Grand Hotel Kempinski High Tatras dr. Kinga Brudzinska [email protected] Overlapping Europes *Kosovo and Montenegro use Euro but are not part of the EU European Commission, “White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025”, 2017 Short history of the euro ⊲ The Delors report (1989), proposed to articulate the realisation of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) in different stages, which ultimately led to the creation of the single currency: the euro. ⊲ The Maastricht Treaty (1992), signed by twelve member countries of the, at the time called, European Community, now the EU. Among the many topics discussed, the European Council decided to create an Economic and Monetary Union. It entered into force on 1 November 1993. ⊲ Euro entered into force for the first time on 1 January 1999 in eleven of the, at the time, fifteen Member States of the Union, but only for non-physical forms of payment. The old currencies co-existed with the new currency until 28 February 2002, the date on which they ceased their legal tender and could not be accepted for payments. ⊲ The Lisbon Treaty (2009) The observance of the parameters established in the various European Treaties, is then merged into this treaty to try to get out of the crisis (Lehman Bank, 2008) and prevent it from being repeated in the future. ⊲ On 9 May 2010 the Council of the European Union agreed on the creation of the European Financial Stability Fund (EFSF) (to provide aid to debt-laiden Eurozone countries) and the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Worldwide Currency: Is It Feasible? Dominick Kerr
    Journal of International Business and Law Volume 5 | Issue 1 Article 4 2006 Development of a Worldwide Currency: Is it Feasible? Dominick Kerr Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl Recommended Citation Kerr, Dominick (2006) "Development of a Worldwide Currency: Is it Feasible?," Journal of International Business and Law: Vol. 5: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl/vol5/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of International Business and Law by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kerr: Development of a Worldwide Currency: Is it Feasible? DEVELOPMENT OF A WORLDWIDE CURRENCY: IS IT FEASIBLE? Dominick Kerr* ABSTRACT: Transactions are the key to success in any economy. Whether it is buying or selling, transactions have been occurring since the beginning of human existence and an entity needs to transact in order to thrive. What once was a localized event between two individuals has now grown to include many parties across a global environment. This global evolution however does not come without its complications. Multiple monetary systems exist between nations that make transacting difficult. There have; however, been recent developments in unifying countries under one currency as seen in the European Union with the Euro. In order to better understand the future of international business it is necessary to explore the origins of transactions, the development of money and monetary exchange, the problems with multiple currencies, and developments of unified currencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euro: a Social Accentuation Experiment
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Molz, Günter; Hopf, Andreas Article The euro: A social accentuation experiment Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Molz, Günter; Hopf, Andreas (2002) : The euro: A social accentuation experiment, Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter, ISSN 1871-3351, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, pp. 26-31 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/155805 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 1 THE EURO – A SOCIAL ACCENTUATION EXPERIMENT By Günter Molz & Andreas Hopf Justus-Liebig-University Giessen [email protected] The introduction of the euro released both hope and fear.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Perils Mallory Orr
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current Honors College Spring 2019 The future of the euro in a post-Greek environment: opportunities and perils Mallory Orr Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019 Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons Recommended Citation Orr, Mallory, "The future of the euro in a post-Greek environment: opportunities and perils" (2019). Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current. 704. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019/704 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The future of the euro in a post-Greek environment: opportunities and perils _______________________ An Honors College Project Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate College of Business James Madison University _______________________ by Mallory Elizabeth Orr Spring 2019 Accepted by the faculty of the College of Business, James Madison University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors College. FACULTY COMMITTEE: HONORS COLLEGE APPROVAL: Project Advisor: Marina V. Rosser, Ph.D. Bradley R. Newcomer, Ph.D., Professor, Economics/International Business Dean, Honors College Reader: S. Kirk Elwood, Ph.D. Professor, Economics/International Business Reader: Hui He Sono, Ph.D. Dept. Head/Professor, Finance/International Business Reader: , , PUBLIC PRESENTATION This work is accepted for presentation, in part or in full, at the Honors College Symposium on April 5, 2019. Table of contents List of figures 3 Acknowledgements 4 Abstract 5 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Euro Currency in Circulation Outside the Euro Area1
    EXTERNAL STATISTICS DIVISION ECB-PUBLIC 6 April 2017 ETS/2017/091 Estimation of euro currency in circulation 1 outside the euro area 1. Introduction Recent empirical evidence on currency in circulation has shown a significant inconsistency between total currency in circulation and the estimates of holdings in various statistical domains.2 Some of the evidence points to the European Central Bank (ECB) estimate of euro currency circulating outside the euro area as a prominent cause of this inconsistency.3 In this context, in 2015 and 2016 the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) discussed alternative methods for the estimation of circulation outside the euro area. A new methodology was approved in December 2016 and introduced on 6 April 2017 with the release of quarterly balance of payments (b.o.p.) and international investment position (i.i.p.) statistics for the last quarter of 2016. The following sections present and explain the new methodology used to estimate euro currency holdings by non-euro area residents. 2. New estimation method: lower and upper bounds Given the large variability in the results of the various estimation methods tested and discussed by the ESCB Statistics Committee (STC) in 2016, it was decided to continue using a linear combination of two methods rather than selecting a single method. Two estimates have been chosen to set boundaries to circulation outside the euro area by establishing a lower limit (an estimate of minimum circulation under certain reasonable assumptions on not observable data) and an upper limit (an estimate of a maximum circulation, also on under certain assumptions).
    [Show full text]