DOCSLIB.ORG

Dear Mr Cade, We Are Writing with Reference to the October 2015 Issue of Context 141, Entitled: Black Voices Ii – Strength and Resilience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dear Mr Cade, We Are Writing with Reference to the October 2015 Issue of Context 141, Entitled: Black Voices Ii – Strength and Resilience Dear Mr Cade, We are writing with reference to the October 2015 issue of Context 141, entitled: Black voices ii – strength and resilience. We are student members of AFT, having both recently completed the intermediate- level training with Central and North West London NHS Trust and are eager to further our systemic leaning and development. With a mixture of curiosity and extreme disappointment, we wish to highlight what we feel are distortions both in the editorial by Pat Gray (pp.1-2) and in the opening article, Culturally grounded therapy in the Palestinian context, by Makungu Akinyela (pp. 3-5). We suggest that references to Israel in these articles are out of place in a magazine dedicated to listening to black voices, and further enhance ideas and beliefs about blame concerning division and conflict rather than seeking to promote dialogue amongst those in conflict throughout the world. We began having conversations around our response to these articles and were aware of strong emotions that had been raised in us. We paid attention to the contexts of religion and culture that were informing our response. We are choosing therefore to be careful to frame this response systemically, seeking to bring in multiple perspectives and to question the editor’s decision to publish an article that, in our opinion, is not true to systemic principles. Through this exploration we hope to act out of the context of systemic practitioner and curious reader. We aim to suggest three key areas of systemic practice that, in our opinion, have been compromised by the publishing of these articles. We would suggest this raises questions about the ‘systemic’ underpinnings of Context magazine. Language As systemic practitioners, we pay careful attention to the language we use. We come to believe that how we talk about people influences what they and we become. We try to be respectful about the people we are working with and yet also are careful to be respectful to those who may not be ‘in the room’ with us. In this regard, we are curious about the language used to describe those on either side of the Israeli- Palestinian conflict in Akinyela’s article. Words such as “victim” and “poor oppressed” are used to describe Palestinians. Similarly, Pat Gray has described the, “grace of the Palestinians” These descriptions connote a compassionate empathy whereas Israel, by contrast, is described by Akinyela as, “politically violent”, and he talks of the “anger towards the Israeli defence forces”, suggestive of a military tone, positioning Israel as a military dominant force. The article makes no mention of the Israeli civilians who also position themselves as ‘victim’. Nor do we learn about the military wing of Hamas committing crimes against their own people, whom Amnesty International in their report Strangling Necks in May 2015 have concluded; committed serious human rights abuses, including abductions, torture and summary and extrajudicial executions with impunity during the 2014 Gaza/Israel conflict. To date, no one has been held to account for committing these unlawful killings and other abuses, either by the Hamas de facto administration that continues to control Gaza and its security and judicial institutions, or by the Palestinian “national consensus” government that has had nominal authority over Gaza since June 2014. Neutrality Makungu Akinyela positions himself within a dominant narrative of Israeli aggressors against Palestinian victims. We are not questioning the suggested plight of people that have restricted freedom of movement. However, we do question the evident gap in pursuing a fuller description of a complex system in conflict. In this regard, Akinyela appears to have compromised a ‘neutral’ position. Dominant narratives view a complex situation as, literally and figuratively, black-and-white. We are guided by the Milan principles of hypothesising, circularity and neutrality, and a non-blaming position. We therefore are surprised to read such an evidently biased and blaming stance on this issue. As systemic practitioners, we would become more curious concerning a repeated cycle of violence and seek to understand more about the reciprocal relationships between those in conflict. Peter Lang has suggested being “guests in a culture,” meaning, “not knowing too quickly” or making judgements about conflict among cultures unfamiliar to us. In systemic practice, we resist the temptation to attribute meanings according to our own ideas and biases and become reflexively aware in order that we take a ‘not-knowing’ approach to the conversations we have with others. We wonder whether being positioned differently within this system would yield a different view. We wonder about the civilian population of Sderot, Israel who live daily with rockets being launched at them from Gaza. Since 2001, Palestinian militants have launched thousands of rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip as part of the continuing Palestinian–Israeli conflict. Their main effect is their creation of widespread psychological trauma and disruption of daily life among the Israeli populace. Medical studies in Sderot, the Israeli city closest to the Gaza Strip, have documented a post-traumatic stress disorder incidence among young children of almost 50%, as well as high rates of depression and miscarriage.1 Indeed, Akinyela minimizes the intent and damage caused by the vehicular attacks in the Autumn of 2014, claiming that, in a recent incident, a car “accidentally brushed” against an Israeli, when in fact the ‘car intifada’, as it was dubbed, was meant to terrorize and kill Israelis. In November 2014, several vehicular attacks wounded and killed Israeli civilians; for example, on 5 November 2014, two vehicular attacks wounded 16 Israelis and killed one.2 According to One Family – a charity 1 "Attacks on Israeli civilians by Palestinians". B'Tselem. 24 July 2014. Martin Patience, Playing cat and mouse with Gaza rockets, BBC News 28-02-2008 Report: Missiles on Sderot increase miscarriages, Jerusalem Post 24-02-2013 Study: Half of Sderot's toddlers suffering from PTSD, Ynet News 30-06-2009 Israeli survey: Almost half of Sderot preteens show symptoms of PTSD, Haaretz 20-11-2012 2 Hanna, Jason (20 November 2014). "Police: Palestinian admits intentionally driving into Israeli soldiers". CNN. Retrieved 25 November 2014. Palestinian confesses to Nov. 5 car attack on troops". Agence France-Presse. 20 November 2014. Retrieved 25 November 2014. supporting families who have lost loved ones in terror attacks – the month of October 2015 has seen forty eight stabbings, five vehicular attacks and five shootings by Palestinian people against Israeli civilians. 3 Furthermore, it is interesting to note that Akinyela makes reference to the attack on a mosque in Hebron in 1994 by an Israeli, a tragic attack condemned by the Israeli government, making a direct comparison with a shooting by a, ‘white supremacist’ in a church in South Carolina. We would suggest this is another example of linear thinking about this conflict, without due consideration for the wider system and the cycle of violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We suggest the two incidents are incomparable through the lens of ‘occupation’, which he suggests is his personal experience, although both equally as devastating and sad in terms of human life lost unnecessarily. If we are to try to maintain neutrality, then we are aiming to seek alternative positions and multiple perspectives within the system. We are curious about the resourcefulness of Palestinian and Israeli people who have developed initiatives to share dialogue, to talk, to break boundaries and foster openness and communication with each other. We question; where is the counter-narrative? Context With heightened curiosity, we read that Akinyela makes a direct personal comparison between black people living in America and people living under the “violent occupation of Palestine”. He talks of being, “pulled in as a participant in the shared experience of occupation”. We wonder whether he is acting out of his highest context in this situation, that of race, and acting less out of the context of a systemic practitioner. If we are to adopt a more ‘curious’ approach, then we may consider this comparison to be an example of ‘Blackwashing’ – the appropriation of the struggles of people with African heritage to justify human rights abuses, including the campaigns of suicide bombings, shootings and lynchings that have become known as ‘intifada’. It may be of interest to note that Israelis are not white but a multi-ethnic society that includes a large African refugee population; that the Palestinians offered refuge to Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir after the International Criminal Court indicted him for rape and genocide of Africans in Darfur; and that ‘resistance’ groups like Hamas are profiting from human and organ trafficking of Eritreans trying to cross the Sinai.4 If we are to take a curious approach, we can invite readers to explore a different perspective on this situation held by a black man. We draw you to the work of Dumisani Washington, a Black American pastor in the USA. In 2013, he established the Institute for Black Solidarity with Israel. Talking from the context of race, he adopts a different perspective and has recently published an article entitled Seven reasons why the Palestinian analogy to the black historical struggle for freedom is hopelessly flawed and down-right offensive.5 As a systemic publication, we would 3 www.onefamily.uk.org 4 http://www.theaggie.org/2015/10/27/guest‐opinion‐blackwashing‐and‐appropriation/ 5 http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/7-reasons-why-the-black-struggle-for-freedom-and-the-palestinian-crisis-are- absolutely-nothing-alike-by-a-black-man-whos-sick-and-tired-of-the-comparisons/ have hoped that alternative perspectives would have been included in this article, to inform the Context readership. We invite your urgent response to these matters, particularly the permission to publish an article with no grounded evidence, no references and without due consideration to seeking other perspectives in a complex conflict.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60
    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • Spousal Abuse Among Immigrants from Ethiopia in Israel
    LEA KACEN Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Spousal Abuse Among Immigrants From Ethiopia in Israel This ethnographic study obtains first-hand infor- ‘‘domestic violence’’ in his native Amharic. My mation on spousal abuse from Ethiopian immi- informer replied that there is no such term in their grants in Israel. Data include 23 interviews with language. ‘‘Then how do you describe situations male and female immigrants of various ages and in which a husband beats or insult his wife’’? I 10 professionals who worked with this commu- asked. He answered, ‘‘There is no reason to speak nity as well as observations and documents. The about it.’’ The conversation aroused my curiosity, findings, verified by participants, show that dur- as language is a means used by cultural groups to ing cultural transition, the immigrants’ code of transmit knowledge and shape social norms honor, traditional conflict-solving institutions, (Green, 1995). I asked myself whether there and family role distribution disintegrate. This was no need for the concept because violence situation, exacerbated by economic distress, toward women was nonexistent in Ethiopia, or proved conducive to women’s abuse. Lack of perhaps because there is another term with a sim- cultural sensitivity displayed by social services ilar meaning, or was it that the phenomenon is an actually encouraged women to behave abusively accepted, self-evident norm that need not be dis- toward their husbands and destroy their fami- cussed judgmentally as it is in Western cultures. lies. Discussion focuses on communication fail- Something else troubled me as well. If there is ures in spousal-abuse discourse between no term for domestic violence in Amharic, how immigrants from Ethiopia and absorbing soci- do immigrants from Ethiopia understand this ety, originating in differences in values, behav- concept as used in Israeli society to describe neg- ior, social representations, and insensitive ative situations of violence between husbands culture theories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth of the Capture of Adolf Eichmann (Pdf)
    6/28/2020 The Truth of the Capture of Adolf Eichmann » Mosaic THE TRUTH OF THE CAPTURE OF ADOLF EICHMANN https://mosaicmagazine.com/essay/history-ideas/2020/06/the-truth-of-the-capture-of-adolf-eichmann/ Sixty years ago, the infamous Nazi official was abducted in Argentina and brought to Israel. What really happened, what did Hollywood make up, and why? June 1, 2020 | Martin Kramer About the author: Martin Kramer teaches Middle Eastern history and served as founding president at Shalem College in Jerusalem, and is the Koret distinguished fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Listen to this essay: Adolf Eichmann’s Argentinian ID, under the alias Ricardo Klement, found on him the night of his abduction. Yad Vashem. THE MOSAIC MONTHLY ESSAY • EPISODE 2 June: The Truth of the Capture of Adolf Eichmann 1x 00:00|60:58 Sixty years ago last month, on the evening of May 23, 1960, the Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion made a brief but dramatic announcement to a hastily-summoned session of the Knesset in Jerusalem: A short time ago, Israeli security services found one of the greatest of the Nazi war criminals, Adolf Eichmann, who was responsible, together with the Nazi leaders, for what they called “the final solution” of the Jewish question, that is, the extermination of six million of the Jews of Europe. Eichmann is already under arrest in Israel and will shortly be placed on trial in Israel under the terms of the law for the trial of Nazis and their collaborators. In the cabinet meeting immediately preceding this announcement, Ben-Gurion’s ministers had expressed their astonishment and curiosity.
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu Formally Denies Charges in Court
    WWW.JPOST.COM THE Volume LXXXIX, Number 26922 JERUSALEFOUNDED IN 1932 M POSTNIS 13.00 (EILAT NIS 11.00) TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2021 27 SHVAT, 5781 Eye in the sky A joint goal Feminist religious art IAI unveils aerial Amos Yadlin on the need to When God, Jesus surveillance system 6 work with Biden to stop Iran and Allah were women Page 6 Page 9 Page 16 How did we miss Netanyahu formally denies charges in court Judges hint witnesses to be called only after election • PM leaves hearing early the exit • By YONAH JEREMY BOB two to three weeks to review these documents before wit- Prime Minister Benjamin nesses are called, that would ramp? Netanyahu’s defense team easily move the first witness fought with the prosecution beyond March 23. ANALYSIS on Monday at the Jerusalem Judge Rivkah Friedman Feld- • By YONAH JEREMY BOB District Court over calling man echoed the prosecution’s witnesses in his public cor- arguments that the defense A lifetime ago when living ruption trial before the March had between one to two years in northern New Jersey, I 23 election. to prepare for witnesses. But often drove further north for It seemed that the judges ultimately the judges did not work. were leaning toward calling seem anxious to call the first Sometimes the correct exit the first witness in late March witness before March 23. was small and easy to miss. or early April, which they A parallel fight between the But there were around five would present as a compro- sides was the prosecution’s or so exits I could use to avoid mise between the sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years with Netanyahu – Maintaining Israel, the Conflict
    INTERNATIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS Ten Years with Netanyahu Maintaining Israel, the Conflict – and Himself DAHLIA SCHEINDLIN January 2017 n Benjamin Netanyahu’s political success has been paved by the Israeli public’s per- ception of imminent existential destruction. Did his dichotomic worldview and his »fortress Israel« mentality create or merely leverage the public’s fears? n In the name of existential security, Netanyahu has justified the deterioration in the Palestinian-Israel conflict, which masquerades as stagnation. His fixation on Iran during two of his recent three terms as Prime Minister has distracted from a lack of policy on the local conflict. n Netanyahu has implemented a clear course of free market economics, which has generated some respectable macroeconomic indicators, but at the expense of mas- sive socio-economic gaps. n Since his re-election in 2015, Netanyahu has concentrated power and portfolios in his hands and has perpetuated earlier efforts to erode Israel’s civil society. He has targeted the press, his ideological opponents in the NGO sector, and Israel’s Arab-Palestinian minority. n In order to temper growing nationalism and democratic erosion, Israel should take genuine steps towards conflict resolution, place checks on unfettered free market principles, and end the aggression against independent civil society, opposition groups, and minorities. DAHLIA SCHEINDLIN | TEN YEARS WITH NETANYAHU Contents 1. Introduction ...........................................................3 2. Security and Foreign Policy: Searching
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Activities 2011
    Annual Report of Activities 2011 Issued: April 2012 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 LEGAL ACTION 3 INTERNATIONAL ADVOCACY 20 LEGAL EDUCATION 29 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 37 Contact us: Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel 94 Yaffa Street, PO Box 8921 Haifa 31090 Israel Tel: +972 (4) 950‐1610; Fax: +972 (4) 950‐3140 Email: [email protected]; Website: www.adalah.org The views expressed in this report are those of Adalah and do not reflect the official position of the European Union or any other donor to Adalah. INTRODUCTION This report highlights Adalah’s main achievements, impact, and key activities conducted in 2011, our 15th year of operation. As this report reflects, Adalah achieved several successes in our legal representation and international advocacy initiatives, and submitted major new impact litigation in cases of crucial importance for the promotion and defense of the rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel and Palestinian residents of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). Adalah also issued new legal publications and delivered papers and lectures at numerous conferences and symposium to which we were invited, both in Israel and abroad. Adalah (“Justice” in Arabic) is an independent human rights organization and legal center with offices in Haifa in the north and Beer el‐Sabe (Beer Sheva) in the south. Established in November 1996, Adalah serves Palestinian citizens of Israel, numbering 1.2 million people or close to 20% of the population, as well as Palestinians living in the OPT. Adalah’s main objectives are to achieve equal individual and collective rights for the Palestinian Arab minority in Israel in different fields including land and planning rights; economic, social and cultural rights; and civil and political rights including the rights of prisoners and detainees, and to defend the rights of Palestinians living under occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Contact Tracing and the Coronavirus: Israeli and Comparative Perspectives
    DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ GOVERNANCE | AUGUST 2020 DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Digital contact tracing is the main technological issue currently facing countries that are dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper explains the concept of digital contact tracing and highlights its importance as a helpful tool for human epidemiological investigations and for minimizing the spread of the novel coronavirus. It goes on to survey the international scale of policy tools that have been selected for the purpose of digital contact tracing — ranging from China, which imposed mandatory means on all citizens that incorporate artificial intelligence and generate a “health code”; to Asian democracies such as South Korea and Taiwan, which have implemented intrusive digital tracking tools that are run by civil agencies, with no involvement of the secret services; to the democratic countries of Europe as well as Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, which employ digital contact tracing only with citizens’ consent. Israel, it was found, has positioned itself between the Asian democracies and China. We believe that a new outbreak of the pandemic in the winter of 2020-2021 is liable to prompt countries to choose one of two options. The first is to refrain from using digital contact-tracing technology because of its infringement on privacy. We believe this would be the wrong choice, because it means losing a major technological advantage for coping with the virus and would merely reinforce the mistaken argument that privacy and innovation are incompatible.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlikely Unionists
    TRADE UNIONS IN TRANSFORMATION 4.0 The expansion and liberaliza- tion of global labour markets have become the catalyst for a labour crisis in Israel’s flag- ship industry, including mass LABOUR AND SOCIAL JUSTICE layoffs and subsequent union- ising attempts by ICT workers. UNLIKELY Successful organizing in the ICT sector built on the trade un- UNIONISTS ion’s ability to mobilise institu- tional power and promote changes in Israeli labour laws. Organised labour in the Israeli ICT sector On this basis, the creation of associational power among ICT workers was supported and Ben Fisher work councils in previously un- September 2020 organized workplaces formed. The organising of ICT workers harbours potential for trade union revitalization even beyond the sector. FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG – Unlikely unionists LABOUR AND SOCIAL JUSTICE UNLIKELY UNIONISTS Organised labour in the Israeli ICT sector »Trade Unions in Transformation 4.0« examines unions’ strategic actions to mobilize power resources in a »new world of work« in which capital uses digital technology to re-organize the labour process. The Global Trade Union Programme of the FES aims to understand how the power balance between capital and labour is impacted and how workers are responding to the threats of the digital rollback towards greater exploitation and precariousness of workers. Pursuing a dialogue and action-oriented approach, the project ultimately intends to contribute to trade unions’ strategic reflections, experimentation and purposeful trans- formation. Content Content 1 INTRODUCTION 2 2 DIGITAL ECONOMY AND THE ISRAELI ICT SECTOR 2 3 REVITALISATION PROCESSES – BUILDING INSTITUTIONAL AND ASSOCIATIONAL POWER 3 4 ACHIEVEMENTS FOR WORKERS IN NEGOTIATIONS AND CBAS 8 5 CONCLUSION 9 Bibliography ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Left to Right: Israel's Repositioning in the World
    2015 年 3 月 第 2 号 The 2nd volume 【編集ボード】 委員長： 鈴木均 内部委員： 土屋一樹、Housam Darwisheh、渡邊祥子、石黒大岳 外部委員： 清水学、内藤正典、池内恵 本誌に掲載されている論文などの内容や意見は、外部からの論稿を含め、執筆者 個人に属すものであり、日本貿易振興機構あるいはアジア経済研究所の公式見解を 示すものではありません。 中東レビュー 第 2 号 2015 年 3 月 16 日発行Ⓒ 編集： 『中東レビュー』編集ボード 発行： アジア経済研究所 独立行政法人日本貿易振興機構 〒261-8545 千葉県千葉市美浜区若葉 3-2-2 URL: http://www.ide.go.jp/Japanese/Publish/Periodicals/Me_review/ ISSN: 2188-4595 IDE ME Review Vol.2 (2014-2015) FROM LEFT TO RIGHT: ISRAEL’S REPOSITIONING IN THE WORLD 左から右へ： イスラエルの政治的な長期傾向 Yakov M. Rabkin* 第二次大戦時に大量のユダヤ人避難民を受け入れたイスラエルは、1946 年の建 国時には共産主義的な社会改革思想に基づくキブツ運動などの左翼的思潮を国家 建設の支柱にしていたが、その後の政治過程のなかで一貫して右傾化の方向をたど り、現在では国際的にみても最も保守的な軍事主義的思想傾向が国民のあいだで広 く共有され、国内のアラブ系住民の経済的従属が永く固定化するに至った。 現在のイスラエル国家を思想的にも実体経済的にも支えている基本的な理念は、 建国時のそれとは全く対極的な新保守主義とグローバル化された「新自由主義」的な 資本主義であり、それは当然ながら国内における安価な労働力としてのアラブ系住民 の存在を所与の前提条件として組み込んでいる。 これは具体的にどのような経緯によるものであり、またイスラエル国家のどのような性 格から導き出されるものなのか。本論稿では政治的シオニズムがイスラエル建国後か ら現在までにたどってきた思想的な系譜を改めて確認し、現在のイスラエルが国際的 に置かれている特異な立場とその背後にある諸要因を説明する。 * Professor of History, University of Montreal. His two recent books are: A Threat from Within: A Century of Jewish Opposition to Zionism (Palgrave Macmillan/Zed Books) that appeared in fifteen languges and and Compendre l’État d’Israël (Écosociété). Both have been published in Japanese by Heibonsha. FROM LEFT TO RIGHT: ISRAEL’S REPOSITIONING IN THE WORLD In its pioneer years, Israel 1 was largely associated with the leftist ideas of collective endeavour and socialist solidarity. Early Israeli elites often came from the kibbutz and were vocal in their allegiance to social justice and equality. This, in turn, brought them admiration and support from socialists around the world. Few noticed that while praised by the left, Israeli society was steadily moving to right. Nowadays Israel has earned the admiration of the right and the extreme right in most Western countries. This paper should explain this apparently puzzling transformation in the international position of this small country in Western Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cast Lead to Protective Edge: Lessons from Israel's Wars in Gaza
    From Cast Lead to Protective Edge Lessons from Israel’s Wars in Gaza Raphael S. Cohen, David E. Johnson, David E. Thaler, Brenna Allen, Elizabeth M. Bartels, James Cahill, Shira Efron C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1888 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9787-3 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photos (clockwise): Nir Elias/Reuters; Amir Cohen/Reuters; Abu Mustafa/Reuters; Tsafrir Abayov/AP Photo Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report examines the Israel Defense Forces operations in Gaza from the end of Operation Cast Lead in 2009 through Operation Pillar of Defense in 2012 to Operation Protective Edge in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Israel-China Relationship
    The Evolving Israel- China Relationship Shira Efron, Howard J. Shatz, Arthur Chan, Emily Haskel, Lyle J. Morris, Andrew Scobell C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2641 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0233-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Photo by esfera via Shutterstock. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Since the early 2000s, relations between China and Israel have expanded rapidly in numerous areas, including diplomacy, trade, investment, construction, educational partnerships, scientific coopera- tion, and tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads: the Future of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Haim Malka Foreword by Samuel W
    Malka Crossroads: The Future of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Haim Malka Foreword by Samuel W. Lewis The U.S.-Israel partnership is under unprecedented strain. The relationship is deep and coopera- tion remains robust, but the challenges to it now are more profound than ever. Growing differ- ences could undermine the national security of both the United States and Israel, making strong cooperation uncertain in an increasingly volatile and unpredictable Middle East. This volume explores the partnership between the United States and Israel and analyzes how political and strategic dynamics are reshaping the relationship. Drawing on original research and dozens of interviews with U.S. and Israeli officials and former officials, the study traces the development CROSSROADS of the U.S.-Israel relationship, analyzes the sources of current tension, and suggests ways for- ward for policymakers in both countries. The author weaves together historical accounts with current analysis and debates to provide insight into this important yet changing relationship. It is a sobering and keen analysis for anyone concerned with the future of the U.S.-Israel partner- ship and the broader Middle East. Haim Malka is deputy director and senior fellow of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. Crossroads The Future of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership HAIM MALKA ISBN 978-0-89206-660-5 FOREWORD BY SAMUEL W. LEWIS Center for Strategic and International Studies Washington, D.C. Ë|xHSKITCy066605zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS 2011 C ROSSROADS ABOUT CSIS At a time of new global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to decisionmakers in government, in- ternational institutions, the private sector, and civil society.
    [Show full text]