0315010504 Upper Chattooga River HUC 8 Watershed: Upper Coosa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

0315010504 Upper Chattooga River HUC 8 Watershed: Upper Coosa Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: 0315010504 Upper Chattooga River HUC 8 Watershed: Upper Coosa Counties: Chattooga, Walker Major Waterbodies (in GA): Chattooga River, Cane Creek, Dry Creek, Duck Creek, Teloga Creek, Spring Creek, Town Creek, Chappel Creek, Spring Branch, Chelsea Creek, Lafayette Water Supply Lake, Howard Lake Federal Listed Species: (historic, known occurrence, or likely to occur in the watershed) E - Endangered, T - Threatened, C - Candidate, CCA - Candidate Conservation species, PE - Proposed Endangered, PT - Proposed Threatened, Pet - Petitioned, R - Rare, U - Uncommon, SC - Species of Concern. Finelined Pocketbook (Hamiota altilis) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Alabama Moccasinshell (Medionidus acutissimus) US: T; GA: T Historical Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Southern Pigtoe (Pleurobema georgianum) US: E; GA: E Historical Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Triangular / Rayed Kidneyshell (Ptychobranchus greenii) US: E; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C, excluding when stage is increasing or above normal (includes the Rayed Kidneyshell (P. foremanianus) in Georgia). Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens) US: E; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) US: T; GA: T Potential Range (habitat model); Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) US: E; GA: E Potential Range (habitat model); Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010504 Upper Chattooga River 1 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report Mohr's Barbara Button (Marshallia mohrii) US: T; GA: T HUC 10 Watershed: Potential Range (county); Survey period: 1 May - early Jun. Use of a nearby reference site to more accurately determine local flowering period is recommended. Monkeyface Orchid (Platanthera integrilabia) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: flowering 15 Jul - 31 Aug. Large-flowered Skullcap (Scutellaria montana) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: mid May - early Jun. Use of a nearby reference site to more accurately determine local flowering period is recommended. Virginia Spiraea (Spiraea virginiana) US: T; GA: T Potential Range (geology); Survey period: 1 Jun - 31 Oct. Virginia Spiraea (Spiraea virginiana) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: 1 Jun - 31 Oct. Tennessee Yellow-eyed Grass (Xyris tennesseensis) US: E; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: 1 Aug - 30 Sep. Federal Candidate, Candidate Conservation, or Petitioned Species: (likely or known to occur in the watershed) Cave or close proximity to a cave (Caves) Named cave; At least one cave or an area with 0.25 mi of a cave occurs in this watershed. Alabama Rainbow (Villosa nebulosa) US: Pet Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Coosa Creekshell (Villosa umbrans) US: Pet Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Green Salamander (Aneides aeneus) US: Pet; GA: R Occurrence; Survey period: 1 Apr - 30 Jun, 01 Oct - 30 Nov. Cherokee Clubtail (Gomphus consanguis) US: Pet; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: 1 -30 Jun Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) US: Pet Occurrence; Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Georgia Aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum) US: CCA; GA: T Potential Range (county); Survey period: 1 Apr - 30 Jun, 01 Oct - 30 Nov. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010504 Upper Chattooga River 2 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: State Listed or Other At-risk Species: (likely or known to occur in the watershed) Chattooga River Crayfish (Cambarus scotti) GA: T Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Lined Chub (Hybopsis lineapunctata) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: year-round. Pigeon Mountain Salamander (Plethodon petraeus) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Three-flowered Hawthorn (Crataegus triflora) GA: T Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Pink Ladyslipper (Cypripedium acaule) GA: U Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Cream-flowered Tick-trefoil (Desmodium ochroleucum) GA: T Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis) GA: E Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Twinleaf (Jeffersonia diphylla) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Fraser's Loosestrife (Lysimachia fraseri) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Alabama Snow-wreath (Neviusia alabamensis) GA: T Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Cumberland Rose Gentian (Sabatia capitata) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Ozark Bunchflower (Veratrum woodii) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010504 Upper Chattooga River 3 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: Limerock Arrow-wood (Viburnum bracteatum) GA: E Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Any of the above species may occur in suitable habitat in this HUC 10 watershed. Survey dates are provided for reference only. Please coordinate with your lead federal agency, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, or USFWS to determine if surveys will help assess project impacts to species of concern. Watershed Specific Concerns: There are federally listed aquatic/wetland and terrestrial species that occur or could occur in this watershed. If the project contains suitable habitat for listed species, please contact your lead federal agency to determine the appropriate next step for those species to inform their NEPA and ESA decisions. Coordination with Georgia Department of Natural Resources may also be helpful in those decisions. Bats/Caves: Please determine if your project will impact caves or cave-like habitats. Please coordinate with our office if your project will impact these habitats or is within 0.5 of these habitats. If your project will directly or indirectly affect hardwood forests, please conduct bat habitat assessments to determine the level of consultation necessary with our agency, in addition to developing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures, if appropriate. We recommend that any tree clearing of forests appropriate for Indiana and/or Northern Long-eared Bats occur outside of the non-volant period (May 15-July 31) to reduce potential impacts when pups are not capable of flight. Our records indicate that there is at least one named cave or habitat within 0.25 mi of a cave in this watershed. This cave could represent maternity habitat for Gray Bats and hibernacula for Gray and Northern Long-eared Bats. Bald Eagle: Bald Eagles and their nests are protected from take, including disturbance, under the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. For information about Bald and Golden Eagles see the Service's regional web page: https://www.fws. gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/ Aquatics: Several federally or state-listed aquatic species occur in this watershed. These species are sensitive to sedimentation and changes in water quality. Please use guidance found in the Riparian Buffer, Streambank, and Stream Channel Protection and Water Quality Protection sections below. Please coordinate any avoidance and minimization efforts for the federally listed species with our office. Because of a high level of past survey effort in the watershed, surveys for aquatic species may not be necessary for federally listed species. Please coordinate with our office prior to conducting surveys for any of these species and in accordance with your Section 10(A)(1)(a) permit. Trout Stream: This watershed contains streams designated as Primary or Secondary Trout Streams by the State of Georgia. These streams support native and introduced trout populations. Maintenance of cold water temperatures, preservation of vegetated stream buffers, and strict sediment and erosion control are critical for these streams. Monkeyface Orchid: This orchid occurs in seeps, springheads, seepy streambanks, or other swampy habitats. Many of the orchid species are highly sought after for ornamental or gardening purposes. Protecting locations of populations of Monkeyface Orchid is important to the recovery of this species. Avoidance of ditching, draining, or filling can help protect the hydrology of orchid habitats. Virginia Spiraea: This wetland species occurs in the northeastern portion of Georgia and is found in and along rocky streams, streambanks, edges of waterfalls and rock ledges that occasionally become flooded to reduce competition from other shrubby plant species. Large-flowered Skullcap: This watershed is within the predicted range of Large-flowered Skullcap. This species occurs in hardwood or mix-hardwood forests with a relatively open understory. Any activities in the vicinity of skullcap populations
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty-Five Years of Change in a Northwest Georgia Old-Growth Forest Author(S): Rachel B Butler, Michael K Crosby, and B
    Fifty-Five Years of Change in a Northwest Georgia Old-Growth Forest Author(s): Rachel B Butler, Michael K Crosby, and B. Nicole Hodges Source: Castanea, 83(1):152-159. Published By: Southern Appalachian Botanical Society https://doi.org/10.2179/16-113 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2179/16-113 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. CASTANEA 83(1): 152–159. FEBRUARY Copyright 2018 Southern Appalachian Botanical Society Fifty-Five Years of Change in a Northwest Georgia Old-Growth Forest Rachel B. Butler,1 Michael K. Crosby,1,2* and B. Nicole Hodges3,4 1Shorter University, Department of Natural Science, 315 Shorter Avenue, Rome, Georgia 30165 3Mississippi State University, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Box 9690, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 ABSTRACT Old-growth forests provide unique insight into historical compositions of forests in the eastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1 PF00931 Species Abbreviated Species
    Table S1 PF00931 Species_abbreviated Species Taxon Database 223 Acoerulea Aquilegia coerulea dicot phytozome12.1.6 152 Acomosus Ananas comosus monocot phytozome12.1.6 124 Ahalleri Arabidopsis halleri dicot phytozome12.1.6 119 Ahypochondriacus Amaranthus hypochondriacus dicot phytozome12.1.6 105 Ahypochondriacus_v2.1 Amaranthus hypochondriacus dicot phytozome12.1.6 177 Alyrata Arabidopsis lyrata dicot phytozome12.1.6 376 Aoccidentale_v0.9 Anacardium occidentale dicot phytozome12.1.6 35 Aofficinalis_V1.1 Asparagus officinalis monocot phytozome12.1.6 160 Athaliana Arabidopsis thaliana columbia dicot phytozome12.1.6 160 Athaliana_Araport11 Arabidopsis thaliana columbia dicot phytozome12.1.6 99 Atrichopoda Amborella trichopoda Amborellales phytozome12.1.6 16 Bbraunii_v2.1 Botryococcus braunii Chlorophyta phytozome12.1.6 308 Bdistachyon Brachypodium distachyon monocot phytozome12.1.6 331 BdistachyonBD21-3_v1.1 Brachypodium distachyon Bd21-3 monocot phytozome12.1.6 535 Bhybridum_v1.1 Brachypodium hybridum monocot phytozome12.1.6 114 Boleraceacapitata Brassica oleracea capitata dicot phytozome12.1.6 187 BrapaFPsc Brassica rapa FPsc dicot phytozome12.1.6 235 Bstacei Brachypodium stacei monocot phytozome12.1.6 297 Bstricta Boechera stricta dicot phytozome12.1.6 414 Bsylvaticum_v1.1 Brachypodium sylvaticum monocot phytozome12.1.6 766 Carabica_v0.5 Coffea arabica dicot phytozome12.1.6 99 Carietinum_v1.0 Cicer arietinum dicot phytozome12.1.6 342 Cclementina Citrus clementina dicot phytozome12.1.6 96 Cgrandiflora Capsella grandiflora dicot phytozome12.1.6
    [Show full text]
  • Cash Thesis Final.Pdf (4.432Mb)
    Evaluating Remote Sensing and Prescribed Fire Methods to Aid in the Restoration of Bottomland Hardwood Forests Invaded by Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense) by James Scollin Cash A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama August 3, 2019 Approved by Christopher Anderson, Chair, Associate Professor of Wetland Ecology William Gulsby, Assistant Professor of Wildlife Management Luke Marzen, Professor of Geosciences John Kush, Research Fellow Abstract Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.) is an invasive shrub with a wide distribution outside its native Southeast Asia range. It is particularly common and problematic in the southeastern U.S., where researchers have documented negative impacts to woody and herbaceous plant communities, which in turn likely affects wildlife habitat quality. This research project evaluated two management tools that could assist land managers in efforts to restore bottomland hardwood forests that have been invaded by L. sinense. Our first objective was to evaluate whether free multispectral satellite imagery and free simple-to-use software could be used to map L. sinense invasions and aid in planning and budgeting restoration projects. We found that the Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin within QGIS was effective at detecting L. sinense, particularly when using late dormant season Sentinel 2 imagery. Our second objective was to evaluate whether prescribed fire could reliably move through bottomland hardwood forests and reduce L. sinense slash following cutting operations to improve the efficiency of follow-up treatments on re-sprouts. We found that stand composition had the most important effect on fire spread (plots with greater proportions of tree species with flammable leaf traits tended to burn best), but that the fires were only successful in a limited number of cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341
    chapteR 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341 Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest communities Margaret Trani Griep and Beverly Collins1 key FindingS • Hotspot areas for plants of concern are Big Bend National Park; the Apalachicola area of the Southern Gulf Coast; • The South has 1,076 native terrestrial vertebrates: 179 Lake Wales Ridge and the area south of Lake Okeechobee amphibians, 525 birds, 176 mammals, and 196 reptiles. in Peninsular Florida; and coastal counties of North Species richness is highest in the Mid-South (856) and Carolina in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The Appalachian- Coastal Plain (733), reflecting both the large area of these Cumberland highlands also contain plants identified by subregions and the diversity of habitats within them. States as species of concern. • The geography of species richness varies by taxa. • Species, including those of conservation concern, are Amphibians flourish in portions of the Piedmont and imperiled by habitat alteration, isolation, introduction of Appalachian-Cumberland highlands and across the Coastal invasive species, environmental pollutants, commercial Plain. Bird richness is highest along the coastal wetlands of development, human disturbance, and exploitation. the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, mammal richness Conditions predicted by the forecasts will magnify these is highest in the Mid-South and Appalachian-Cumberland stressors. Each species varies in its vulnerability to highlands, and reptile richness is highest across the forecasted threats, and these threats vary by subregion. Key southern portion of the region. areas of concern arise where hotspots of vulnerable species • The South has 142 terrestrial vertebrate species coincide with forecasted stressors. considered to be of conservation concern (e.g., global • There are 614 species that are presumed extirpated from conservation status rank of critically imperiled, imperiled, selected States in the South; 64 are terrestrial vertebrates or vulnerable), 77 of which are listed as threatened or and 550 are vascular plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 134/Wednesday, July 12, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 12, 2000 / Proposed Rules 42973 minute topographic quadrangle. Other of 1973, as amended (Act), because the the top of the calyx. Flowering occurs boundaries are based upon the Public Land endangered designation no longer from mid-May to early June, and fruits Survey System. Within the historical correctly reflects the current status of mature in June and early July. boundaries of the Canada De Los Osos Y this plant. This proposed Bridges (1984) stated, ``The genus Pecho Y Islay Mexican Land Grant, Scutellaria can be easily recognized by boundaries are based upon section lines that reclassification is based on the are extensions to the Public Land Survey substantial improvement in the status of its distinctive calyx, with a protrusion, System developed by the California this species. Since listing, 22 additional or `cap' on the upper lobe.'' Scutellaria Department of Forestry and obtained by us sites have been discovered, and the total montana could be confused with other from the State of California's Stephen P. known number of individuals has species of Scutellaria. Bridges (1984) Teale Data Center. Township and Range increased from about 6,700 to more than also listed some important characters of numbering is derived from the Mount Diablo 48,000. This proposal, if made final, Scutellaria montana: (1) A terminal Base and Meridian. would implement the Federal protection inflorescence; (2) a large corolla at least Map Unit 1: T. 29 S., R. 10 E., all of section and recovery provisions for threatened 2.5 cm (1 in) long; (3) tapering or 35 above mean sea level (MSL); T.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lamiaceae, Large-Flowered Skullcap) Through Abundance Monit
    AIDING CONSERVATION OF THE FEDERALLY THREATENED SCUTELLARIA MONTANA (LAMIACEAE, LARGE-FLOWERED SKULLCAP) THROUGH ABUNDANCE MONITORING AND TRANSPLANTATION STUDIES By Heather Mae Kile Approved: Jennifer N. Boyd Joey Shaw Assistant Professor of Biological and Associate Professor of Biological and Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences (Chairperson of Thesis) (Committee Member) J. Hill Craddock Professor of Biological and Environmental Sciences (Committee Member) Herbert Burhenn Jerald Ainsworth Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Dean of the Graduate School AIDING CONSERVATION OF THE FEDERALLY THREATENED SCUTELLARIA MONTANA (LAMIACEAE, LARGE-FLOWERED SKULLCAP) THROUGH ABUNDANCE MONITORING AND TRANSPLANTATION STUDIES By Heather Mae Kile A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science in Environmental Science The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee August 2011 ii ABSTRACT Scutellaria montana Chapm. (large-flowered skullcap) is a federally threatened species endemic to Georgia and Tennessee. This thesis presents conservation work on this species through abundance monitoring at a single site in Catoosa County, Georgia, and transplantation experiments at two sites located in Hamilton County, Tennessee, and Catoosa County, Georgia. Plants naturally occurring in the fixed plots surveyed over seven years had an overall stable growth status, though relatively low floral induction and seedlings. Transplantation revealed influences of abiotic and biotic factors. One transplantation site was fenced to prevent human trampling and apparently discouraged vertebrate grazing, resulting in dramatic flower number increases. The other transplantation site without fencing had mixed results with prescribed burning and canopy thinning treatments. Evidence suggested that grazing pressures increased with the treatments, so the control plot was apparently best suited for transplantation when herbivory exclosures are absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Include ICRMP? Comment Involved in the Management ….” Management the in Involved TNARNG
    APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISED INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE VOLUNTEER TRAINING SITE – CATOOSA TENNESSEE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CATOOSA COUNTY, GEORGIA PREPARED BY Tennessee Military Department Environmental Office February 2012 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-1 VTS-Catoosa Appendix A Environmental Assessment This page intentionally left blank. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-2 VTS-Catoosa Appendix A Environmental Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISED INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN, VOLUNTEER TRAINING SITE CATOOSA TENNESSEE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD REVIEWED BY: DATE: __________________________________________ ________________________ TERRY M. HASTON MG, TNARNG The Adjutant General __________________________________________ ________________________ ISAAC G. OSBORNE, JR. BG, TNARNG Assistant Adjutant General, Army __________________________________________ ________________________ DARRELL D. DARNBUSH COL, TNARNG Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations __________________________________________ ________________________ GARY B. HERR LTC, TNARNG Training Site Commander _________________________________________ ________________________ STEPHEN B. LONDON COL, TNARNG Environmental Officer Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-3 VTS-Catoosa Appendix A Environmental Assessment Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-4 VTS-Catoosa Appendix A Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents A-5
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Spring Wildflower Pilgrimage
    BotSoc News, July 2011 1 Volume 86 Number 4 July 2011 Georgia Botanical Society IN THIS ISSUE: 2011 PRING ILDFLOWER ILGRIMAGE S W P Society News – Other than Christmas, the event I look forward to the most each year is the Georgia Botanical Society’s Wildflower Pilgrimage. p2 The three-day gathering of nature lovers takes place each spring in a different part of the state and offers several field trips to Book Review- surrounding natural areas, many of which are off the beaten p3 path. This year's pilgrimage was based in Carrollton in west Georgia. As usual, it provided a chance to visit areas that are sel- Discoveries - dom, if ever, visited by the public because of their remoteness, p4 private ownership or strict protection. A morning field trip that I opted for, for instance, was to a remote, seldom-visited area near the boundary of Sweetwater Creek State Park in Douglas Upcoming County. We followed park ranger Don Scarbrough to the edge Field Trips – of a large pond, where we came upon a breathtaking view of p6 a great blue heron rookery -- some 50 nests, made of sticks, Jim Drake scattered among several tall sycamore trees. Some of the nests Field Trip already had chicks, whose heads we could see. We watched Reports– quietly and unobtrusively as the adults tended the nests, perched statuesque on high branches or glided about in graceful flight. p9 Charles Seabrook, Atlanta Journal & Constitution, April 19, 2011 Memorials & Donations– p11 Hal Massie Jim Drake No pilgrimage is successful without at least one Jean Smith photo of a trillium and one photo of Tom Patrick Paula Refi’s eagle eye found a new and a trillium.
    [Show full text]
  • Mckerrow 1996- TN5304--FWS 1996 Large Flowered Skullcap
    Large-flowered Skullcap (Scu tellaria montana) Recovery Plan U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Recovery Plan for Large-flowered Skullcap (Scutellaria montana) Prepared by Alexa McKerrow Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Nashville, Tennessee for Southeast Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Atlanta, Georgia Approved: Noreen K. Clo~Regional irector, Southeast Region U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modifications as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion ofrecovery tasks. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. Large-flowered Skullcap Recovery Plan. Asheville, North Carolina. 31 pp. Additional copies of this plan may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301/492-6403 or 1-800/582-3421 Fees for recovery plans vary, depending upon the number of pages.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Report & Society News
    BotSoc News, July 2009 Volume 83 Number 4 July 2009 Georgia Botanical Society PRESIDENT’S REPORT & SOCIETY NEWS Electronic Version of Newsletter. I hope ing will be published in the September BotSoc IN THIS those of you with internet capability saw the May News. Bring a picnic lunch and afterwards, ISSUE: issue of BotSoc News on the Society’s website. Tom Patrick will lead a short hike. BotSoc has Rich Reaves and I received many comments been involved with a plant inventory of Pickett’s Trip Reports (mostly favorable) from members who viewed the Mill. One of the plants of interest, Georgia aster newsletter after obtaining a link to the electronic (Symphyotrichum georgianum), should be in from the version through the BotSoc email list. flower. Make your plans now to attend. Infor- 40th Spring An electronic newsletter offers many ad- mation about Pickett’s Mill can be found under Pilgrimage – vantages over a print version: color images, the historic sites page on Georgia’s state park p2 significant reduction in printing and mailing website (http://www.gastateparks.org). costs and conservation of natural resources. The Upcoming savings in printing and mailing costs will ben- 2010 Wildflower Pilgrimage.Planning for Field Trips – efit our field botany grants and other program the 2010 Pilgrimage is well under way. Please functions. My think- mark your calendars p9 ing, which will require for March 12-14, 2010. board approval, is to GEORGIA BOTANICAL SOCIETY We will return to Bain- modify the membership bridge, GA and botani- Change in renewal form for 2010 ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING cally rich SW Georgia By-laws - to allow members to se- and adjoining areas of p12 lect whether they wish SEPTEMBER 26, 2009 the Florida panhandle.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2018 Revised October 19, 2018
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2018 Revised October 19, 2018 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA (Wataug>f Wnke8 /Madison V" Burke Y H Buncombe >laywoodl Swain f/~~ ?uthertor< /Graham, —~J—\Jo< Polk Lenoii TEonsylvonw^/V- ^ Macon V \ Cherokey-^"^ / /Cloy Union I Anson iPhmonf Ouptln Scotlar Ons low Robeson / Blodon Ponder Columbus / New>,arrfver Brunewlck Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2018 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published every two years. Further information may be obtained by contacting the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, 1651 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1651; by contacting the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 1701 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699- 1701; or by contacting the North Carolina Plant Conservation Program, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 1060 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1060. Additional information on rare species, as well as a digital version of this list, can be obtained from the Natural Heritage Program’s website at www.ncnhp.org. Cover Photo of Allium keeverae (Keever’s Onion) by David Campbell. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]