DOCSLIB.ORG

13899 MS Bgrounder V2.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
13899 MS Bgrounder V2.Indd Microsoft Europe, Middle East and Africa Background Information FEBRUARY 2006 Microsoft was founded on the idea that if people have the right tools, they will do new and exciting things. Over the past three decades, we have never lost sight of this vision, and our commitment to helping people realise their dreams and achieve their full potential is greater than ever. Contact Details EMEA Headquarters Microsoft EMEA Cœur Défense, Tour B 100, Esplanade du Général de Gaulle 92932 Paris La Défense France Tel: +33 1 70 99 10 00 Website: www.microsoft.com/emea Microsoft EMEA Press Offi ce Tel: +44 870 2430515 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.microsoft.com/emea/presscentre 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Contents The Company 4 Microsoft EMEA Leadership Team 7 Research and Innovation Facilities in EMEA 8 Industry Issues in the Region 10 Milestones 15 Facts and Figures 16 Executive Biographies 18 Subsidiary Offi ces 22 MICROSOFT EMEA • FEBRUARY 2006 3 The Company At Microsoft, we create software that helps people and organisations realise their potential. Microsoft Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) is a division of Microsoft Corp that encompasses over 60 local offi ces and delivers products and services in 138 countries across the region. Led by President Neil Holloway, Microsoft EMEA sets the direction of the company in this vast and varied region, oversees subsidiary operations, and is responsible for a range of business functions including research, product development and distribution, and partner support. An industry leader, Microsoft also emphasises corporate responsibility and community participation. The company engages with all levels of government and academia and supports numerous programmes for social and economic development. Microsoft’s commitment to the region is further refl ected in the more than 12,000 Microsoft employees in EMEA, over 33,000 independent software vendors (ISVs) that develop products on the Microsoft platform, and millions of small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) whose goals for growth and greater business effi ciency Microsoft makes possible with its technology. Regional investments in research and development include Microsoft’s largest software development centre outside of the US, located in Copenhagen, Denmark; Microsoft Research Cambridge in the UK; and the European Microsoft Innovation Centre (EMIC) in Aachen, Germany. Twenty local-language MSN® sites serve EMEA’s culturally and linguistically diverse population. At the European Product Development Centre (EPDC) in Dublin, Ireland, Microsoft developers and linguists specialise in 50 languages and dialects to create local- language products. 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Mission and Values Microsoft was founded on the idea that if technologies. At the heart of our vision of the people have the right tools, they will do new and Digital Decade is Microsoft .NET, a set of software exciting things. Over the past three decades, technologies designed to connect information, we have never lost sight of this vision, and our people, systems and devices. commitment to helping people realise their At Microsoft, we know that how we conduct dreams and achieve their full potential is greater our business is as important as delivering than ever. outstanding products and services. How we work From now until the end of 2010 — a period with customers, partners, governments, vendors that Chairman and Chief Software Architect Bill and communities worldwide affects every aspect Gates calls the Digital Decade — computing of our success as a company. As Microsoft CEO devices will continue to grow in importance and Steve Ballmer says, “It’s not enough to just do the play an indispensable part in the lives of most right things; we have to do them in the right way.” people. Technologies will continue to converge, making computing a seamless and pervasive i www.microsoft.com/emea experience. This vision inspires Microsoft’s core principles, fuelling the company’s ongoing efforts to enhance its products and develop new Commitment to Our Customers and Partners We are motivated and inspired every day by how Enterprise and Partner Group Microsoft customers use our software to fi nd This customer segment team oversees the creative solutions to business problems, develop company’s relationships with major customers, as ground-breaking ideas and stay connected to well as enterprise partners — systems integrators, what is most important to them. Our customer outsourcers, management consultancies and segment teams are responsible for ensuring that, technology vendors. across all business groups, customers have a seamless experience. Small and Midmarket Solutions and Partners Group Developer and Partner Group Responsible for Microsoft EMEA’s small and Responsible for evangelising Microsoft’s .NET midsize business solutions, this group also drives vision in the region to developers and software the company’s channel initiatives, licensing architects, the Developer and Partner Group is and pricing policies, and licensing compliance also responsible for products that serve software campaigns. developers, including ISVs, systems integrators and corporate developers. EMEA Enterprise Services This organisation is responsible for the fi eld Public Sector Group services team, which provides technical This group pursues ongoing public sector consulting and support services to Microsoft collaboration and technology development, customers in the region. from e-government solutions connecting governments and citizens, through to dynamic e-learning applications that redefi ne the ways students, teachers and parents interact. MICROSOFT EMEA • FEBRUARY 2006 5 Our Businesses In September 2005, Microsoft aligned its = Information Worker Group. This business operations into the following three divisions, unit includes the Microsoft Offi ce system encompassing its seven business groups. of products, including Visio® drawing and diagramming software, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Platform Products and Microsoft Publisher, and new products such as Services Division the InfoPathTM information gathering program This division comprises Windows® client, server and the OneNote® note-taking program. and tools products, and the MSN network of This group also oversees Microsoft Windows internet services. The division’s mission is to SharePoint® Services. enable new user experiences and drive customer value through continued innovation in the = Microsoft Business Solutions Group. MBS software platform and software services delivered offers the DynamicsTM suite of products that over the internet. allow small and midsize organisations to connect employees, customers and suppliers. = Windows Client Group. This business unit is The fi nancial management, customer responsible for Microsoft’s popular desktop relationship management, supply chain operating system, including the most recent management and analytics applications versions of the platform — Windows XP, work to streamline processes across an Windows 2000 and the upcoming Windows entire organisation, giving businesses insight VistaTM. The Windows Client group also to respond rapidly, plan strategically and manages specialised versions of the operating execute quickly. MBS products are customised system such as Windows XP Tablet PC Edition and delivered through a worldwide network and Windows Embedded. of channel partners that provide specialised services and local support. = Server and Tools Group. This business unit manages Windows Server SystemTM Microsoft Entertainment and Devices Division integrated server software. The group This division focuses on delivering richer and creates software for streamlining businesses’ more relevant scenarios on a wide range of IT infrastructure and reducing costs for electronic devices — for people at work, at home enterprise administrators. Products include and on the move. Windows Server 2003, developer tools and the MSDN® developer programme. = Home and Entertainment Group. This business unit encompasses Microsoft’s = MSN Group. The MSN group covers all of consumer portfolio, comprising PC gaming Microsoft’s web-based services, including the software and hardware, personal productivity MSN network, MSN Internet Access, MSN TV tools, reference products and digital media and Hotmail® web-based e-mail service. A products such as Windows XP Media Center. world leader in delivering online services to It also includes products such as Xbox 360TM consumers and advertising opportunities to video game and entertainment system, online businesses worldwide, MSN is also committed games and the TV platform. to helping people have a safe, secure and positive online experience. = Mobile and Embedded Devices (MED) Group. MED provides a software platform Microsoft Business Division enabling device manufacturers to develop This division, which includes the Information smart, connected products that offer a Worker and Microsoft Business Solutions (MBS) compelling mobile experience. MED products groups, delivers software and software-based include the Windows CE operating system, services that enable organisations to succeed eMbedded Visual C++® development system in today’s constantly evolving workplace by and Windows XP Tablet PC Edition. amplifying the impact of their people. Microsoft is uniquely positioned for this opportunity with the new division’s programmes, servers and software-based services addressing the spectrum from structured business processes to personal productivity needs. 6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Microsoft EMEA Leadership
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shared Source Licensing Program for the Windows Embedded Compact (Formerly Windows CE) Platform
    9/6/2020 Shared Source Initiative | Licensing Program for the Windows Embedded Compact Platform Search Microsoft.com PRODUCTS STORE DOWNLOADS SUPPORT United States Shared Source Initiative > Windows Embedded Compact Source Licensing Program Shared Source Licensing Program for the Windows® Embedded Compact (formerly Windows CE) Platform Shared Source Licensing Programs Overview Microsoft offers a Shared Source licensing program for the Windows Embedded Compact (formerly Windows CE) platform. This program is applicable to the Windows Embedded Compact and Windows Embedded CE products. The Windows Embedded Shared Source program helps OEMs and developers speed development, reduce troubleshooting and code debugging time, receive assistance in remote device support and gain a deeper technical understanding of Windows Embedded Compact software. Public/Sample Source code is built at no additional cost into the purchased copies of the Windows Embedded Compact Platform Builder toolkit and provides access to nearly 4 million lines of code. Depending on a partner’s needs and qualifications, deeper levels of Shared Source code access (Private and Premium) are available. How to Participate Public/Sample Shared Source Public/Sample Shared Source code is available at no additional cost with each purchased copy of the Windows Embedded Compact 7 Platform Builder toolkit. Private Shared Source Private Shared Source Code is an optional component of the Windows Embedded Compact 7 Platform Builder toolkit that can be installed during the setup process. The toolkit user must electronically accept the terms and conditions of the Shared Source licensing agreement (EULA) before the Private source code can be installed. Premium Derivatives Program Microsoft also offers Premium access to advanced Windows Embedded Compact 7 source code through the Premium Derivatives licensing program.
    [Show full text]
  • Ict Policy Review: National E-Commerce Strategy for Egypt United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT ICT POLICY REVIEW: NATIONAL E-COMMERCE STRATEGY FOR EGYPT UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT ICT POLICY REVIEW: NATIONAL E-COMMERCE STRATEGY FOR EGYPT New York and Geneva 2017 ii ICT POLICY REVIEW: NATIONAL E-COMMERCE STRATEGY FOR EGYPT © 2017, United Nations This work is available open access by complying with the Creative Commons licence created for intergovernmental organizations, available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States. The designation employed and the presentation of material on any map in this work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of any firm or licensed process does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations. Photocopies and reproductions of excerpts are allowed with proper credits. This publication has been edited externally. United Nations publication issued by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD/DTL/STICT/2017/3 NOTE iii NOTE Within the Division on Technology and Logistics of UNCTAD, the ICT Policy Section carries out policy-oriented analytical work on the development implications of information and communications technologies (ICTs) and the digital economy, and is responsible for the biennial production of the Information Economy Report. The ICT Policy Section, among other things, promotes international dialogue on issues related to ICTs for development, such as e-commerce and entrepreneurship in the technology sector, and contributes to building developing countries’ capacities to design and implement relevant policies and programmes in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Volume 4, Number 1
    Vol 4 No 1 April 2003 International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Volume 4, Number 1. ISSN: 1492-3831 April – 2003 Reflections on Student Support in Open and Distance Learning Alan Tait, Guest Editor Faculty of Education and Language Studies Open University UK This is a very interesting moment to reflect on Student Support in Open and Distance Learning (ODL). After some 10 years of the radical intrusion of a range of technologies, principally those grouped around what has been broadly termed ICT, we have the chance to see if and how the world of ODL has qualitatively changed. I suggest that those of us who began our careers more than a decade ago are like those survivors in a landscape painting of a battle, peering about the field while some wisps of smoke still hang in the air from earlier cannon barrage. But the battle that the picture represents is over. There are new authorities in place, and of course there are losers: those who have lost power if not their lives. We look to see who has died, which amongst the wounded can be given help, while those who walk away wonder if the world has really changed. Have we just substituted one set of powerful rulers for another? Or has the way we live our lives been altered forever? To begin with a historical perspective on the European context, as is well known correspondence education is said to have begun in England in 1844 with Isaac Pitman's shorthand course delivered by correspondence, using the new postal system, enabled in its turn by the rail system that was beginning to make travel and communication across England quicker than ever before (Shrestha, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Mit Vorsicht Zu Geniessen
    Achim Patzner, Dr. Walter Speth, active BIT1, Bonn Open Source mit Vorsicht zu geniessen Seit Richard Stallman in den 80ern die Free Software Foundation ins Leben gerufen hat, geistert der Begriff der freien Software durch die Branche und wird allzu oft voreilig als lizenzfrei und/oder kostenfrei missverstanden. Das Gegenteil kann der Fall sein: Die Wahl für eine Open Source Plattform kann Herstellern ein Lizenzmodell aufoktroyieren, das mit den Unternehmenszielen nicht vereinbar ist. Zeit für eine Richtigstellung: Nach der "public domain software" und der bereits genannten "free software" kam im Siegeszug von Linux und mit der Veröffentlichung der Quellen des Netscape-Browsers im Mozilla-Projekt Anfang 1998 die "open source software" und mittlerweile aus dem Hause Microsoft auch noch den Begriff der "shared software" (man hat verstanden, dass derartige Campagnen durchaus Marketing-Charakter tragen). Die Free Software Foundation distanziert sich übrigens vom Begriff "open source Software"2. Allerdings steht gerade dieser Begriff für das kollektive Erstellen von Software-Projekten, aber weniger wegen eines speziellen philosophischen Ansatzes, sondern weil er zu einer Zeit geprägt wurde, in der die hohe Durchdringung der weltweiten Vernetzung die Kommunikation innerhalb der Entwicklergemeinschaft ermöglichte und weil Linux als augenscheinlicher Vertreter für Open-Source-Produkte den Kondensationskern für das Bewusstsein von kostenfreier Software darstellte. Richard Stallman wollte "Freiheit für Software", er wollte aber nicht Software im Sinne von Freibier (so seine eigene Formulierung). Die Freiheit besteht im wesentlichen darin, dass der Hersteller sein geistiges Erzeugnis, die Sourcen verfügbar macht. Deren Nutzung ist allerdings durchaus im rechtlichen Rahmen der mitgelieferten Lizenzvereinbarung zu sehen. Es geht also weder darum, Software - 2 - ohne lizenzrechtliche Einschränkungen nutzen zu können, noch geht es darum, die Anwender mit lizenzfreier Software zu versorgen.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft's Shared Source Initiative As an Alternative to Open
    How open is open? Microsoft’s Shared Source Initiative as an Alternative to Open Source Software Anne-Kathrin Kuehnel Department of Law and Criminology, University of Wales Aberystwyth Email: [email protected] Introduction: “Judging a Book by its Cover” There are few certainties in life: everybody is playing football but, in the end, Germany wins. The murderer is always the butler. Or the gardener. It never rains in “Midsomer Murders”. Until recently, one of these used to be “Open Source good, Microsoft bad.” But now, it would appear that times have, indeed, changed and nothing in the software industry is as perceived and traditional wisdom would have it: Microsoft is opening up some of its source code. Over the past few years, Microsoft has promoted a project called “Shared Source Initiative” which allows access to source code to certain customers (e.g. research institutions and independent software vendors) on a restricted basis. Furthermore, it has also introduced some licenses which appear to give unrestricted access to source code and seem to closely resemble ‘traditional’ Open Source licenses. Given that availability of source code is a prime characteristic of Open Source Software it could be argued that Microsoft has embraced the Open Source Software philosophy. And indeed, one of Microsoft’s sharpest critics, Lawrence Lessig, is openly praising Microsoft for its Shared Source Initiative for opening up some of their source code.1 Rumour also has it that Microsoft has at least been thinking about submitting some of their licenses to the Open Source Initiative for certification.2 Does this mean that Microsoft has (finally) seen the light and embraced the Open Source philosophy? If Open Source Software was only defined by the accessibility of source code, the availability of source code would equal open source.
    [Show full text]
  • Is American Power Declining?
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 6-1-2011 Is American power declining? Mohamed Gabr Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation Gabr, M. (2011).Is American power declining? [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1050 MLA Citation Gabr, Mohamed. Is American power declining?. 2011. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1050 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IS AMERICAN POWER DECLINING? MOHAMED GABR A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE MAY/2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ............................................. 5 A. HEGEMONIC STABILITY THEORY AND ITS REVISIONS AND CRITICISMS ................... 5 B. KENNEDY‟S THEORETICAL APPROACH AND ITS CRITICISMS ...................................... 16 C. WALLERSTEIN
    [Show full text]
  • WSIS+10 OVERALL REVIEW of the IMPLEMENTATION of the WSIS OUTCOMES Profiles of Progress Table of Contents
    Arab Republic of Egypt WSIS+10 OVERALL REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WSIS OUTCOMES Profiles of Progress Table of Contents Foreword WSIS Action Line C1: The Role of Governance Authorities and All Stakeholders in the Promotion of ICTs for Development WSIS Action Line C2: Information and Communication Infrastructure WSIS Action Line C3: Access to Information and Knowledge WSIS Action Line C4: Capacity Building WSIS Action Line C5: Building Confidence and Security in the Use of ICT WSIS Action Line C6: Enabling Environment WSIS Action Line C7: ICT Applications: Benefits in All Aspects of Life WSIS Action Line C8: Cultural Diversity and Identity, Linguistic Diversity and Local Content WSIS Action Line C9: Media WSIS Action Line C10: Ethical Dimensions of the Information Society WSIS Action Line C11: International and Regional Cooperation Annex I: Partners in Creating the Digital Society in Egypt Annex II: Abbreviations Egypt over the last decade has sought to embrace and build a digital society – focusing on the key pillars of developing the ICT sector and industry, expanding and maintaining the necessary infrastructure, formulating relevant policies and regulations, supporting innovation and entrepreneurship, and providing citizens with access to ICTs and the knowledge to use them in order to improve their quality of life. This Profiles of Progress document is an addendum to the WSIS+10 Overall Review of the Implementation of the WSIS Outcomes. It details initiatives, programs and Foreword projects adopted in Egypt over the last 10 years in the field of ICT for development, and showcases the work of government entities, civil society, the private sector and other stakeholders in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Dynamic Analysis of Legacy Embedded Systems in Full Emulated Environment Ta-Lun Yen Txone Iot/ICS Security Research Labs (Trend Micro) $(Whoami)
    Enabling dynamic analysis of Legacy Embedded Systems in full emulated environment Ta-Lun Yen TXOne IoT/ICS Security Research Labs (Trend Micro) $(whoami) ● @evanslify ● Researcher @ TXOne Networks (Trend Micro), 2019/11-present ● Reverse Engineering, protocol analysis, wireless, hardware 2 2021-07-12 Outline ● Our goals & Background of Windows CE6 ● CE6 Bootloader & power-on initialization ● Inside CE6 Application Loader & Memory management ● Reconstructing extracted binaries to dynamic execution ● Conclusion 3 2021-07-12 Our goal ● Emulate CE6 image from device with QEMU ● We don’t want to buy every hardware for research – We ended up buying one actually (for comparison) ● Serial ports & debugger is not present on every hardware 4 2021-07-12 Background of Windows CE6 5 2021-07-12 Horrors from the ancient ● WinCE hasn’t been actively exploited (yet…) ● However, it runs everywhere – In cars, Parking meters, aircraft IFEs, subway turnstiles, medical devices, power plants... 6 2021-07-12 Difference between {NT, CE} ● Microsoft Shared Source Initiative: (partial) source code ● Loosely adheres to NT APIs and behavior ● Real-time OS 7 2021-07-12 Difference between {NT, CE} ● While having different APIs and behaviors between CE and NT... ● Some exploits and techniques might work on both CE & NT – ...with some efforts, e.g MS17-010 [1] [1] https://www.fracturelabs.com/posts/2017/exploiting-ms17-010-on-windows-embedded-7- devices/ 8 2021-07-12 Current methods to study CE6 firmware ● File extraction – https://github.com/nlitsme/eimgfs (was dumprom)
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating the Commons: a Political Economic Analysis
    INCORPORATING THE COMMONS: A POLITICAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE INVOLVEMENT IN FREE AND OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE by BENJAMIN J. BIRKINBINE A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2014 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Benjamin J. Birkinbine Title: Incorporating the Commons: A Political Economic Analysis of Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the School of Journalism and Communication by: Dr. Janet Wasko Chairperson Dr. Biswarup Sen Core Member Dr. Gabriela Martinez Core Member Eric Priest, J.D. Institutional Representative and J. Andrew Berglund Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2014 ii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Benjamin J. Birkinbine Doctor of Philosophy School of Journalism and Communication September 2014 Title: Incorporating the Commons: A Political Economic Analysis of Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software Free (libre) and open source software (FLOSS) emerged in the 1980s as a radical alternative to proprietary software. Fighting back against what FLOSS enthusiasts viewed as overly restrictive intellectual property protections placed on proprietary software, FLOSS was designed with the intent of granting users the right to study, modify, adapt, or otherwise tinker with the source code of software. As such, FLOSS users were able to collaborate in producing software that could be distributed freely and widely to others, who could, in turn, make changes to the software.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Preface . ix 1. Open Source Licensing, Contract, and Copyright Law . 1 Basic Principles of Copyright Law 1 Contract and Copyright 3 Open Source Software Licensing 4 Issues with Copyrights and Patents 7 The Open Source Definition 8 Warranties 11 2. The MIT, BSD, Apache, and Academic Free Licenses . 14 The MIT (or X) License 14 The BSD License 15 The Apache License, v1.1 and v2.0 17 The Academic Free License 24 Application and Philosophy 30 3. The GPL, LGPL, and Mozilla Licenses . 34 GNU General Public License 35 GNU Lesser General Public License 49 The Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL 1.1) 62 Application and Philosophy 81 4. Qt, Artistic, and Creative Commons Licenses . 85 The Q Public License 85 Artistic License (Perl) 90 Creative Commons Licenses 98 vii 5. Non-Open Source Licenses . 114 Classic Proprietary License 114 Sun Community Source License 120 Microsoft Shared Source Initiative 144 6. Legal Impacts of Open Source and Free Software Licensing . 147 Entering Contracts 148 Statutory Developments Related to Software Contracts 150 The Self-Enforcing Nature of Open Source and Free Software Licenses 151 The Global Scope of Open Source and Free Software Licensing 153 The “Negative Effects” of Open Source and Free Software Licensing 154 Community Enforcement of Open Source and Free Software Licenses 158 Compatible and Incompatible Licensing: Multiple and Cross Licensing 159 7. Software Development Using Open Source and Free Software Licenses . 164 Models of Open Source and Free Software Development 164 Forking 171 Choosing an Open Source or Free Software License 174 Drafting Open Source Licenses 176 Appendix: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software: Risks and Rewards V2.0, 03 August 2005
    Open Source Software: Risks and Rewards v2.0, 03 August 2005 Author(s)Gary Hein Conclusion Open source software (OSS) brings new opportunities and risks to information technology (IT) vendors and customers. Software commoditization is being profoundly affected from the infrastructure layer and moving up to the application layer. As a result, OSS is changing the strategies and business models of hardware and software vendors and system integrators. Customers should understand the risks and rewards of OSS, and should formulate strategies that bring OSS benefits to their IT departments while mitigating the business and legal risks. Synopsis Open source software (OSS) is more than just free software. It’s a development process, a distribution model, and a set of new software licenses. And, as characterized by OSS proponents, it’s a movement. OSS projects, such as Linux and Apache HTTP server, are commoditizing enterprise and Internet infrastructure, and thus pose threats for some vendors while creating new market opportunities for others. OSS brings more to information technology (IT) than just free software. It grants freedom from vendor lock-in and application churn, freedom to inspect, modify, and improve source code, and the freedom to influence or contribute to projects key to a company’s survival. But these freedoms come at a price. Although OSS is free, it isn’t always less expensive to implement due to migration, support, training, and maintenance costs. OSS projects add new twists to business risks such as vendor viability and stability, and legal issues remain uncertain as many popular licenses have yet to be tested in a court of law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradox of Source Code Secrecy
    KATYAL FORMATTED 6/24/19 11:31 PM THE PARADOX OF SOURCE CODE SECRECY Sonia K. Katyal† INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 102 I. SOURCE CODE SECRECY AND COPYRIGHT ............... 109 A. Code: An Introductory (and Incomplete) History .................................................................. 111 B. The Birth of Source Code Secrecy ................ 114 C. The Copyrightability of Software .................. 117 1. Early Accommodations of Trade Secrecy ... 119 2. Copyrighting Code................................... 122 D. The Continuing Overlap Between Copyright and Trade Secrecy ............................................. 125 II. THE SHIFTING BOUNDARIES OF SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY ................................................... 129 A. Patentability vs. Secrecy .............................. 131 B. The Rise and Fall of Software Patentability ... 136 1. The Opening of the Window of Patentability .............................................................. 137 2. Narrowing the Window of Patentability ..... 141 III. TRADE SECRECY AS DESTINATION .......................... 145 A. The Lingering Monopoly of Trade Secrecy ..... 146 B. Judicial Accommodation in Kewanee ........... 149 C. Rethinking Complementarity in Software ..... 151 † Haas Distinguished Chair and Chancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley. Many, many thanks to the following for comments and conversation: Ken Bamberger, Ash Bhagwat, Andrew Bradt, Ari Chivikula, Ryan Calo, Christian Chessman, Danielle Citron,
    [Show full text]