DOCSLIB.ORG

17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 No. 17-50762 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT City of El Cenizo et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. State of Texas et al., Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JEFF LANDRY PATRICK MORRISEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ATTORNEY GENERAL LOUISIANA OF WEST VIRGINIA Elizabeth Baker Murrill Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. Solicitor General Deputy Solicitor General 1885 North 3rd Street Counsel of Record Baton Rouge, LA 70802 State Capitol Building 1, Room 26-E Telephone: (225) 326-6766 Charleston, WV 25305 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (304) 558-2021 Email: thomas.m.johnsonjr Counsel for Amicus Curiae @wvago.gov the State of Louisiana Counsel for Amicus Curiae the State of West Virginia 1 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 The States of West Virginia, Louisiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mis- souri, Oklahoma, and South Carolina request leave to file the accompanying amicus brief in support of the State of Texas’s emergency motion for stay pending appeal.* Amici States notified all parties of amici’s intent to file this brief and received con- sent from defendants and the following plaintiffs-appellees: the City of El Paso; the City of San Antonio; Rey Saldana, San Antonio City Councilmember; the Texas Association of Chicanos in Higher Education; La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Inc.; the Workers Defense Project; Bexar County; Judge Sarah Eckhardt; Sheriff Sally Her- nandez; Travis County; and the Texas Association of Hispanic County Judges and County Commissioners. The remaining plaintiffs-appellees have not responded. As discussed at greater length in the attached brief, amici States have three significant interests in the disposition of this motion. First, they have an interest in complying with federal immigration law and ensuring that the municipalities that exercise the States’ power do the same. Texas’s Senate Bill 4 (“SB4”), 2017 Tex. * Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a)(2) provides that at a case’s merits stage, “a state may file an amicus-curiae brief without the consent of the parties or leave of court.” Nevertheless, consistent with the motion for leave filed by amicus the United States of America, we understand that it is this Court’s practice to require motions for leave from all amici. Mot. for Leave to File Amicus Brief in Support of the Motion to Stay (Sept. 11, 2017) 1 n.1. Amici States therefore file this motion for leave pursuant to Fifth Circuit practice. 1 2 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 3 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 4, codified at Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 752.053 et seq., accom- plishes that important goal by prohibiting local entities and officials from “adopt[ing], enforc[ing], or endors[ing]” policies that prohibit or “materially limit[]” the enforcement of federal immigration laws. Id. § 752.053(a)(1). Second, sanctu- ary-city policies can harm neighboring States by making it easier for illegal immi- grants who commit crimes to evade law enforcement and to travel out-of-state. Third, amici States have an interest in ensuring that courts follow the strict standards that govern requests to enjoin state laws. This amicus brief will aid the Court’s consideration of the emergency stay motion by providing legal arguments and context beyond the arguments the parties have advanced. The proposed amicus brief argues that Texas will likely prevail against the argument that the term “materially limits” is unconstitutionally vague, in part because of the myriad examples throughout other areas of the law where “ma- terial” and like terms have been upheld against similar challenges. The brief also argues that SB4’s prohibition on “endorsing” policies that limit federal immigration laws encompasses only local officials’ official actions—not speech they may engage in privately or during political campaigns—and accordingly does not violate the 2 3 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 4 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 First Amendment. Finally, the interests of amici States underscore the public’s in- terest in this motion’s disposition by showing the harm the preliminary injunction imposes not only on Texas, but on a national scale. For these reasons, amici States respectfully request leave to file the attached amicus brief. Respectfully submitted, JEFF LANDRY PATRICK MORRISEY ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. Elizabeth Baker Murrill Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. Solicitor General Deputy Solicitor General Counsel of Record OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 1885 North 3rd Street GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA Baton Rouge, LA 70802 State Capitol Building 1, Room 26-E Telephone: (225) 326-6766 Charleston, WV 25305 Telephone: (304) 558-2021 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Email: [email protected] the State of Louisiana Counsel for Amicus Curie the State of West Virginia September 19, 2017 3 4 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 5 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 COUNSEL FOR ADDITIONAL AMICI Steve Marshall Joshua D. Hawley Attorney General Attorney General State of Alabama State of Missouri 501 Washington Ave 207 W. High St. Montgomery, AL 36130 Jefferson City, MO 65102 (334) 242-7300 (573) 751-3321 Leslie Rutledge Mike Hunter Attorney General Attorney General State of Arkansas State of Oklahoma 323 Center St. 313 NE 21st St. Little Rock, AR 72201 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 (501) 682-2007 (405) 522-4392 Christopher M. Carr Alan Wilson Attorney General Attorney General State of Georgia State of South Carolina Georgia Department of Law P.O. Box 11549 40 Capitol Square SW Columbia, SC 29211 Atlanta, GA 30334 (803) 734-3970 (404) 651-9453 5 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162983 Page: 6 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on September 19, 2017, the foregoing document was served on the counsel of record for all parties through the CM/ECF system. /s/ Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. September 19, 2017 Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. Date 6 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162984 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 No. 17-50762 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT City of El Cenizo, Texas; Raul L. Reyes, Mayor, City of El Cenizo; Tom Schmerber, County Sheriff; Mario A. Hernandez, Maverick County Constable PCT. 3-1; League of United Latin American Citizens; Maverick County; City of El Paso, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City of Austin, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, Travis County; Travis County Judge Sarah Eckhardt; and Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez, Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellees, City of Dallas, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, Texas Association of Hispanic County Judges and County Commissioners, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, City of Houston, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, v. State of Texas; Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas, in his Official Capacity; and Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General, Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PROPOSED BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE STATES OF WEST VIRGINIA, LOUISIANA, AND SIX OTHER STATES IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JEFF LANDRY PATRICK MORRISEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL Elizabeth Baker Murrill OF WEST VIRGINIA Solicitor General Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. 1885 North 3rd Street Deputy Solicitor General Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Counsel of Record Telephone: (225) 326-6766 State Capitol Building 1, Room 26-E Email: [email protected] Charleston, WV 25305 Telephone: (304) 558-2021 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Email: [email protected] the State of Louisiana Counsel for Amicus Curiae the State of West Virginia [caption continued on inside cover] 7 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162984 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 [caption continued from front cover] El Paso County; Richard Wiles, Sheriff of El Paso County, in his Official Capacity; and the Texas Organizing Project Education Fund, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. State of Texas; Greg Abbott, Governor; Ken Paxton, Attorney General; and Steve McCraw, Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety, Defendants- Appellants. City of San Antonio; Rey A. Saldana, in his Official Capacity as San Antonio City Councilmember; Texas Association of Chicanos in High Education; La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Inc.; and Workers Defense Project, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. State of Texas; Ken Paxton, Sued in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of Texas; and Greg Abbott, Sued in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, Defendants-Appellants. 8 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162984 Page: 3 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to the fourth sentence of Fifth Circuit Rule 28.2.1, amici States need not furnish a certificate of interested parties because they are government entities. 9 of 27 Case: 17-50762 Document: 00514162984 Page: 4 Date Filed: 09/19/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST AND IDENTITY OF AMICI ................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 4 I. THE TERM “MATERIALLY LIMITS” IS NOT IMPERMISSIBLY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sean D. Reyes Attorney General
    STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SEAN D. REYES ATTORNEY GENERAL Spencer E. Austin Ric Cantrell Tyler R. Green Brian L. Tarbet Chief Criminal Deputy Chief of Staff Solicitor General Chief Civil Deputy August 28, 2020 Donald J. Trump The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500 RE: H.R.4172, The National Child ID Act Dear Mr. President, First, thank you for your steadfast and continued leadership and all you do to keep families safe across America. The purpose of this letter is to ask for your support through any federal agency including the United States Department of Justice to make available funds, whether those currently identified to fight human trafficking or from other sources, to immediately fortify our defenses as parents throughout America against child exploitation, abduction and human trafficking. Statistics show that more than 800,000 children go missing each year including runaways and those abducted. That is one child gone every 40 seconds. And we are seeing those statistics rise along with child sexual abuse, exploitation and human trafficking. You recently met with our friend and NFL Hall of Fame Player Mike Singletary to discuss a program he and many other Collegiate and NFL Coaches champion called the National Child ID Program. We also support this effort as we fight daily to protect children in our role as state Attorneys General. The Child ID Program began in 1997 with the American Football Coaches Association in response to findings that parents did not have fingerprints or DNA for their children in the case of an emergency or abduction.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Letter
    Attorneys General of Louisiana, Indiana, Georgia, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia September 30, 2020 The Honorable A. Mitchell McConnell The Honorable Charles Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate 317 Russell Senate Office Building 322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 [email protected] [email protected] The Honorable Lindsey Graham The Honorable Dianne Feinstein Chairman Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary Committee on the Judiciary 290 Russell Senate Office Building 331 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 [email protected] [email protected] Re: Support for the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court of the United States Dear Senators: We, the undersigned Attorneys General of our States, write to urge the Senate to promptly hold a hearing on and confirm the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court of the United States. Judge Barrett is a distinguished legal scholar and an exceptional appellate judge with a track record of interpreting the Constitution according to its text and original public meaning. As we are sure your review of her exemplary record will reveal, she has the qualifications, experience, and judicial philosophy to be an outstanding Associate Justice. We are aware that there are those who believe the Senate should not hold a hearing on the President’s nominee. In response, we quote excerpts from a 2016 letter sent to the Senate by the Attorneys General of California, New York, and 17 other states: “The Constitution clearly sets out the process for filling a Supreme Court vacancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Here – Option 1
    Post Election Briefing - State Attorneys General Stephen Cobb: Partner, Former Deputy Attorney General of Virginia Jim Schultz: Partner, Former Senior Associate White House Counsel, Former General Counsel to Pennsylvania Governor Bill Shepherd: Partner, Florida’s Former Statewide Prosecutor December 8, 2020 Copyright © 2020 Holland & Knight LLP. All Rights Reserved Thank you for joining today’s program • All participants are on mute • Please ask questions via Q&A box • Today’s program is being recorded and will be posted on our website • For technical assistance please reach out to the host via the chat box 2 Today’s Presenters Stephen Cobb Jim Schultz Bill Shepherd Partner Partner Partner Former Deputy Former Senior Associate Florida’s Former Attorney General White House Counsel, Statewide Prosecutor of Virginia Former General Counsel to Pennsylvania Governor 3 The Growing Role of State Attorneys General Looking Back on 2020 The Election Results 2021 – What to Expect 4 Priorities of State Attorneys General During 2020 • Consumer Protection • False Claims Act • Antitrust • Environmental Enforcement Actions • COVID-19 • Data Breach/Data Privacy 5 State Attorney General Race Results . Indiana . Pennsylvania . Todd Rokita (R) defeated Jonathan Weinzapfel (D) . Josh Shapiro* (D) defeated Heather Heidelbaugh (R) . Missouri . Utah . Eric Schmitt* (R) defeated Richard Finneran (D) . Sean D. Reyes* (R) defeated Greg Skordas (D) . Montana . Vermont . Austin Knudsen (R) defeated Ralph Graybill (D) vs. T.J. Donovan* (D) defeated H Brooke Paige (R) . North Carolina . Washington . Josh Stein* (D) defeated Jim O’Neill (R) . Bob Ferguson* (D) defeated Matt Larkin (R) . Oregon . West Virginia . Ellen Rosenblum* (D) defeated Michael Cross (R) . Patrick Morrisey* (R) defeated Sam Brown Petsonk (D) Aside from the 10 races detailed above, Maine’s next state legislature and the governors of New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and American Samoa are due to appoint new AGs.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Governor's Commission to Rebuild Texas
    EYE OF THE STORM Report of the Governor’s Commission to Rebuild Texas John Sharp, Commissioner BOARD OF REGENTS Charles W. Schwartz, Chairman Elaine Mendoza, Vice Chairman Phil Adams Robert Albritton Anthony G. Buzbee Morris E. Foster Tim Leach William “Bill” Mahomes Cliff Thomas Ervin Bryant, Student Regent John Sharp, Chancellor NOVEMBER 2018 FOREWORD On September 1 of last year, as Hurricane Harvey began to break up, I traveled from College Station to Austin at the request of Governor Greg Abbott. The Governor asked me to become Commissioner of something he called the Governor’s Commission to Rebuild Texas. The Governor was direct about what he wanted from me and the new commission: “I want you to advocate for our communities, and make sure things get done without delay,” he said. I agreed to undertake this important assignment and set to work immediately. On September 7, the Governor issued a proclamation formally creating the commission, and soon after, the Governor and I began traveling throughout the affected areas seeing for ourselves the incredible destruction the storm inflicted Before the difficulties our communities faced on a swath of Texas larger than New Jersey. because of Harvey fade from memory, it is critical that Since then, my staff and I have worked alongside we examine what happened and how our preparation other state agencies, federal agencies and local for and response to future disasters can be improved. communities across the counties affected by Hurricane In this report, we try to create as clear a picture of Harvey to carry out the difficult process of recovery and Hurricane Harvey as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • WV Campaign Finance
    State of West Virginia Campaign Financial Statement (Long Form) in Relation to the 2016 Election Year Candidate or Committee Name Candidate or Committee's Treasurer Patrick Morrisey Craig Blair Political Party (for candidates) Treasurer's Mailing Address (Street, Route, or P.O. Box) Republican 47 Wasser Drive Office Sought (for Candidates) District/Division City, State, Zip Code Daytime Phone # Attorney General State Martinsburg, WV 25403 304-67-9363 Election Cycle Reporting Period (check one): Check if Applicable: X Primary - First Report Pre-primary Report Post-primary Report Amended Report You must also check box of General - First Report Pre-general Report Post-general Report appropriate reporting period Final Report Zero balance required. PAC must also file Form F-6 Non-Election Cycle Reporting Period: Dissolution Annual Report 2016 Calendar Year Due last Saturday in March or within 6 days thereafter REPORT TOTALS Fill in totals at the completion of the report. RECEIPTS OF FUNDS: Totals for this CASH BALANCE SUMMARY Period Beginning Balance $546,445.87 Contributions $58,227.73 (ending balance from previous report) Monetary Contributions from all Fund-Raising + $102,014.00 Total Monetary Contributions + Events $160,241.73 Receipt of a Transfer of Excess Funds + $0.00 Total Other Income + $624.12 Total Monetary Contributions: = $160,241.73 Subtotal: a. = In-Kind Contributions + $389.40 $707,311.72 Total Contributions: = $160,631.13 Total Expenditures Paid $58,932.04 Other Income $624.12 Total Disbursements of Excess Funds + $0.00 Loans Received + $0.00 Repayment of Loans + $0.00 Total Other Income: = $624.12 Subtotal: b. = $58,932.04 OUTSTANDING LOANS & DEBTS: Ending Balance: = Unpaid Bills $0.00 (Subtotal a.
    [Show full text]
  • AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All Times EDT
    AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All times EDT THURSDAY 7/16: 11:30am – 2:30pm EDT (2 panels) • 11:30am – 12:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Impacts and Adaptations by Innovators and Industry, Consumer Warnings and State Government Oversight Roles (60 min) Moderator: Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General, Oregon Attorney General’s Office o Lev Kubiak, Vice President and Deputy Chief Security Officer, Pfizer o Haley Schaffer, Senior Legal Counsel, 3M o Speaker TBD, Lowe’s Summary: Price gouging laws typically apply to prices of essential items needed in an emergency. Price gouging occurs when a seller increases the price of goods, services or commodities to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. Hear how Attorneys General and industry continue working together to identify and stop this practice during the pandemic. The internet has driven a dramatic increase in the expansion of the counterfeit drug market. Learn about the low- risk/high-reward nature of this criminal industry, and how regulators are stepping up to combat it. • 1pm-2:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Price Gouging Issues (90 min) Moderator: William Tong, Attorney General, Connecticut o Clayton Friedman, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP o Paul Singer, Senior Counsel for Public Protection, Texas AGO o Victoria Butler, Director, Consumer Protection Division, Florida AGO o Nicholas Trutanich, US Attorney, District of Nevada Summary: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Attorneys General have been on the watch for price gouging. As a result, several large companies have become subject to Attorney General investigations, and others have been named defendants in class action lawsuits brought by unhappy consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • August 16, 2017 the Honorable Roger Wicker Chairman Senate
    August 16, 2017 The Honorable Roger Wicker Chairman Senate Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation and the Internet Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation The Honorable Brian Schatz Ranking Member Senate Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation and the Internet Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation The Honorable Marsha Blackburn Chairman House of Representatives Subcommittee on Communications and Technology Committee on Energy and Commerce The Honorable Michael Doyle Ranking Member House of Representative Subcommittee on Communications and Technology Committee on Energy and Commerce RE: Amendment of Communications Decency Act Dear Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Schatz, Chairman Blackburn, and Ranking Member Doyle: In 2013, Attorneys General from 49 states and territories wrote to Congress, informing it that some courts have interpreted the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (“CDA”) to render state and local authorities unable to take action against companies that actively profit from the promotion and facilitation of sex trafficking and crimes against children. Unfortunately, nearly four years later, this problem persists and these criminal profiteers often continue to operate with impunity. The recent news highlighting the potential complicity of online classified-ad company Backpage.com in soliciting sex traffickers’ ads for its website once again underscores the need 1850 M Street, NW to expand, not limit, the ability of all law-enforcement agencies to fight sex Twelfth Floor Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 326-6000 http://www.naag.org/ trafficking.1 The undersigned Attorneys General once again respectfully request that the United States Congress amend the CDA to affirm that state, territorial, and local authorities retain their traditional jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute those who facilitate illicit acts and endanger our most vulnerable citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • VAWA”) Has Shined a Bright Light on Domestic Violence, Bringing the Issue out of the Shadows and Into the Forefront of Our Efforts to Protect Women and Families
    January 11, 2012 Dear Members of Congress, Since its passage in 1994, the Violence Against Women Act (“VAWA”) has shined a bright light on domestic violence, bringing the issue out of the shadows and into the forefront of our efforts to protect women and families. VAWA transformed the response to domestic violence at the local, state and federal level. Its successes have been dramatic, with the annual incidence of domestic violence falling by more than 50 percent1. Even though the advancements made since in 1994 have been significant, a tremendous amount of work remains and we believe it is critical that the Congress reauthorize VAWA. Every day in this country, abusive husbands or partners kill three women, and for every victim killed, there are nine more who narrowly escape that fate2. We see this realized in our home states every day. Earlier this year in Delaware, three children – ages 12, 2 ½ and 1 ½ − watched their mother be beaten to death by her ex-boyfriend on a sidewalk. In Maine last summer, an abusive husband subject to a protective order murdered his wife and two young children before taking his own life. Reauthorizing VAWA will send a clear message that this country does not tolerate violence against women and show Congress’ commitment to reducing domestic violence, protecting women from sexual assault and securing justice for victims. VAWA reauthorization will continue critical support for victim services and target three key areas where data shows we must focus our efforts in order to have the greatest impact: • Domestic violence, dating violence, and sexual assault are most prevalent among young women aged 16-24, with studies showing that youth attitudes are still largely tolerant of violence, and that women abused in adolescence are more likely to be abused again as adults.
    [Show full text]
  • August 25, 2021 the Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General
    MARK BRNOVICH DAVE YOST ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL August 25, 2021 The Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Constitutionality of Illegal Reentry Criminal Statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Dear Attorney General Garland, We, the undersigned attorneys general, write as chief legal officers of our States to inquire about your intent to appeal the decision in United States v. Carrillo-Lopez, No. 3:20-cr- 00026-MMD-WGC, ECF. 60 (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2021). As you know, in that decision, Chief Judge Du found unconstitutional 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the statute that criminalizes the illegal reentry of previously removed aliens. We appreciate that you recently filed a notice of appeal, preserving your ability to defend the law on appeal. We now urge you to follow through by defending the law before the Ninth Circuit and (if necessary) the Supreme Court. We ask that you confirm expeditiously DOJ’s intent to do so. Alternatively, if you do not intend to seek reversal of that decision and instead decide to cease prosecutions for illegal reentry in some or all of the country, we ask that you let us know, in writing, so that the undersigned can take appropriate action. Section 1326, as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, is unremarkable in that it requires all aliens—no matter their race or country of origin—to enter the country lawfully. In finding the law racially discriminatory against “Latinx persons,” Chief Judge Du made some truly astounding claims, especially considering that, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Mexico has more legal permanent residents in the United States, by far, than any other country.1 Chief Judge Du determined that, because most illegal reentrants at the border are from Mexico, the law has an impermissible “disparate impact” on Mexicans.
    [Show full text]
  • Morrisey V. West Virginia AFL-CIO, Et
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2017 Term _______________ FILED September 15, 2017 No. 17-0187 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK _______________ SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA PATRICK MORRISEY, in his official capacity as West Virginia Attorney General, and THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants Below, Petitioners v. WEST VIRGINIA AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs Below, Respondents ________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County The Honorable Jennifer F. Bailey, Judge Civil Action No. 16-C-959-969 REVERSED AND REMANDED ________________________________________________________ Submitted: September 5, 2017 Filed: September 15, 2017 Patrick Morrisey Vincent Trivelli, Esq. Attorney General The Law Office of Vincent Trivelli Elbert Lin Morgantown, West Virginia Solicitor General Robert M. Bastress, Jr., Esq. Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. Morgantown, West Virginia Deputy Solicitor General Counsel for the Respondents Gilbert Dickey Assistant Attorney General Charleston, West Virginia Counsel for the Petitioners Matthew B. Gilliam, Esq. John D. Hoblitzell, III, Esq. National Right to Work Legal Defense Kay Casto & Chaney, PLLC Foundation, Inc. Charleston, West Virginia Springfield, Virginia Counsel for The Honorable James C. Counsel for Amici Curiae National Justice, in his Official Capacity as Right to Work Legal Defense and Governor of the State of West Virginia Education Foundation, Inc., and Reginald Gibbs Maneesh Sharma, Esq. Washington, District of Columbia Derk A. Wilcox, Esq. Thomas P. Maroney, Esq. Mackinac Center for Public Policy Maroney Williams Weaver & Pancake Mackinac Center Legal Foundation PLLC Midland, Michigan Charleston, West Virginia Danielle Waltz, Esq. Counsel for Amicus Curiae American Jackson Kelly PLLC Federation of Labor and Congress of Charleston, West Virginia Industrial Organizations Counsel for Amicus Curiae Mackinac Center for Public Policy Jeffrey G.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Insight 2020
    ELECTION INSIGHT 2020 “This isn’t about – yeah, it is about me, I guess, when you think about it.” – President Donald J. Trump Kenosha Wisconsin Regional Airport Election Eve. 1 • Election Insight 2020 Contents 04 … Election Results on One Page 06 … Biden Transition Team 10 … Potential Biden Administration 2 • Election Insight 2020 Election Results on One Page 3 • Election Insight 2020 DENTONS’ DEMOCRATS Election Results on One Page “The waiting is the hardest part.” Election results as of 1:15 pm November 11th – Tom Petty Top Line Biden declared by multiple news networks to be America’s next president. Biden’s Pennsylvania win puts him over 270. Georgia and North Carolina not yet called. Biden narrowly leads in GA while Trump leads in NC. Trump campaign seeks recounts in GA and Wisconsin and files multiple lawsuits seeking to overturn the election results in states where Biden has won. Two January 5, 2021 runoff elections in Georgia will determine Senate control. Senator Mitch McConnell will remain Majority Leader and divided government will continue, complicating the prospects for Biden’s legislative agenda, unless Democrats win both runoff s. Democrats retain their House majority but Republicans narrow the Democrats’ margin with a net pickup of six seats. Incumbents Losing Reelection • Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL) • Rep. Harley Rouda (D-CA-48) • Rep. Xochitl Torres Small (D-NM-3) • Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) • Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-FL-26) • Rep. Max Rose (D-NY-11) • Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) • Rep. Donna Shalala (D-FL-27) • Rep. Kendra Horn (D-OK-5) • Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • May 25, 2021 the Honorable Charles Schumer Majority Leader United
    May 25, 2021 The Honorable Charles Schumer The Honorable A. Mitchell McConnell Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate 322 Hart Senate Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Richard Durbin The Honorable Charles E. Grassley Chairman Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary Committee on the Judiciary Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senators: The Second Amendment is the cornerstone of the Bill of Rights. It guarantees our natural God-given right to defend our lives, our families, our property, and our freedom. The confirmation of David Chipman to head the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) is an attack on that right and on the millions of law-abiding gun owners across the country. As state Attorneys General, we took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and protect the rights and freedoms of our constituents. These responsibilities force us to stand in opposition to Mr. Chipman’s nomination and in support of our constituents’ rights. Firearms are far beyond a hobby or a passion. They are a part of our national heritage and everyday life for tens of millions of Americans, particularly those of us who live in rural areas. We use them to hunt, protect livestock, and provide peace of mind when law enforcement may be miles away. This is why Mr. Chipman’s past affiliation with anti-gun organizations and his extreme positions on commonly owned firearms is so concerning to us as attorneys general and why he is unfit to be confirmed as head of the ATF.
    [Show full text]