DOCSLIB.ORG

Organisation of the Education System in Finland 2009/2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Organisation of the Education System in Finland 2009/2010 Organisation of the education system in Finland 2009/2010 FI European Commission EURYBASE FINLAND 1. POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BACKGROUND AND TRENDS.............................................................. 7 1.1. Historical Overview.................................................................................................................................. 7 1.2. Main Executive and Legislative Bodies ................................................................................................... 8 1.3. Religions................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.4. Official and Minority Languages ........................................................................................................... 10 1.5. Demographic Situation ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.6. Economic Situation................................................................................................................................ 11 1.7. Statistics ................................................................................................................................................. 11 2. GENERAL ORGANISATION OF THE EDUCATION SYSTEM AND ADMINISTRATION OF EDUCATION........... 17 2.1. Historical Overview................................................................................................................................ 17 2.2. Ongoing Debates and Future Developments....................................................................................... 18 2.3. Fundamental Principles and Basic Legislation...................................................................................... 18 2.4. General Structure and Defining Moments in Educational Guidance................................................... 20 2.5. Compulsory Education .......................................................................................................................... 22 2.6. General Administration ......................................................................................................................... 23 2.6.1. National Level ................................................................................................................................. 23 2.6.2. Regional Level................................................................................................................................. 25 2.6.3. Local Level....................................................................................................................................... 25 2.6.4. Educational Institutions, Administration, Management................................................................ 27 2.7. Internal and External Consultation between Levels of Education ....................................................... 30 2.7.1. Internal Consultation ...................................................................................................................... 30 2.7.2. Consultation Involving Players in Society at Large........................................................................ 31 2.8. Methods of Financing Education .......................................................................................................... 34 2.8.1. Pre-primary Level............................................................................................................................ 34 2.8.2. Basic Education and General Upper Secondary Level ................................................................... 34 2.8.3. Vocational Upper Secondary Level ................................................................................................ 35 2.8.4. Higher Education Level................................................................................................................... 36 2.8.5. Adult Education and Training......................................................................................................... 37 2.9. Statistics ................................................................................................................................................. 40 3. PRE-PRIMARY EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................... 42 3.1. Historical Overview................................................................................................................................ 43 3.2. Ongoing Debates and Future Developments....................................................................................... 44 3.3. Specific Legislative Framework ............................................................................................................. 45 3.4. General objectives ................................................................................................................................. 45 3.5. Geographical Accessibility..................................................................................................................... 46 3.6. Admission Requirements and Choice of Institution/Centre ................................................................ 46 3.7. Financial Support for Pupils’ Families ................................................................................................... 47 3.8. Age Levels and Grouping of Children ................................................................................................... 47 3.9. Organisation of Time ............................................................................................................................. 48 3.9.1. School Year...................................................................................................................................... 48 3.9.2. Weekly and Daily Timetable ........................................................................................................... 48 3.10. Curriculum, Types of Activity, Number of Hours ................................................................................ 48 3.11. Teaching Methods and Materials........................................................................................................ 49 3.12. Evaluation of Children ......................................................................................................................... 49 3.13. Support Facilities ................................................................................................................................. 50 3.14. Private Sector Provisions ..................................................................................................................... 50 3.14.1. Historical overview........................................................................................................................ 51 3.14.2. Ongoing Debates and Future Development ............................................................................... 51 3.14.3. Specific legislative framework...................................................................................................... 51 3.15. Organisational Variations and Alternative Structures ........................................................................ 51 3.16. Statistics ............................................................................................................................................... 51 4. SINGLE STRUCTURE EDUCATION ................................................................................................................. 53 4.1. Historical Overview................................................................................................................................ 53 4.2. Ongoing Debates and Future Developments....................................................................................... 54 4.3. Specific Legislative Framework ............................................................................................................. 55 4.4. General Objectives................................................................................................................................. 56 4.5. Geographical Accessibility..................................................................................................................... 56 4.6. Admission Requirements and Choice of School................................................................................... 56 1 EURYBASE FINLAND 4.7. Financial Support for Pupils’ Families ................................................................................................... 57 4.8. Age Levels and Grouping of Pupils ....................................................................................................... 57 4.9. Organisation of School Time ................................................................................................................. 57 4.9.1. School Year in Basic Education....................................................................................................... 57 4.9.2. Weekly and Daily Timetable in Compulsory Basic Education........................................................ 58 4.10. Curriculum, Subjects, Number of Hours ............................................................................................. 58 4.10.1. The Syllabus of Basic Education ................................................................................................... 58 4.11. Teaching Methods and Materials.......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Trends in Technology Education in Finland Ari Alamäki
    19 Current Trends in Technology Education in Finland Ari Alamäki It is an old tradition in Finland to teach a school sub- tional strategies are encouraged by a 16 student per ject dealing with the use of machines, materials, technology classroom limit. processes, techniques, and tools. Since 1866, educa- In informal discussions between teachers and tional sloyd (handicraft) has been a compulsory teacher educators, technology education typically school subject for both boys and girls. Even today in includes more out-of-date technological processes, Finnish technology education, which is nowadays such as the making of wood and metal items, than called tekninen työ in the Finnish national curriculum modern technological processes. Studies by Alamäki guidelines, students still design and make products (1999), Kananoja (1997), Kantola (1997), Lindh (Kankare,1997;Kolehmainen,1997). (1996), Parikka (1998), and Rasinen (1999) come to Comprehensive schools provide compulsory basic similar conclusions. Thus, technology education education for pupils between the ages of 7 and 16. should be more connected to the modern technolog- Education beyond the age of 16 is voluntary, taking ical world, although it already covers activities related the form of either three years of study at a theoreti- to computers, construction kits, electronics, electric- cally oriented high school or a two-to five-year course ity, machines, and technical drawing. Technological in a vocational school. concepts, such as communication, construction, The activity of students is concentrated on prob- energy, manufacturing, and transportation should be lem-centered design projects (inventions) that tran- taught because they are an essential part of students’ scend the limitations of materials and techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Educational Reform in Finland
    A short history of educational reform in Finland Pasi Sahlberg1, PhD [email protected] April 2009 1 The views expressed in this chapter are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent those of the European Training Foundation or any of the European Union institutions. - 1 - Abstract Finland, a democratic welfare state and the northernmost member of the European Union is an example of a nation that has been able to transform its traditional economy into a modern knowledge economy within relatively short period of time. Education has played important role in this process. This chapter argues that system-wide excellence in student learning is attainable at reasonable cost, using education policies differing from conventional market- oriented reform strategies prevalent in many other countries. Unlike many other education systems, test-based accountability and externally determined learning standards have not been part of Finnish education policies. Relying on data from international student assessments, indicators and earlier policy studies, this chapter describes how steady improvement in student learning has been attained through Finnish education policies based on equity, flexibility, creativity, teacher professionalism, and mutual trust. The conclusion is that educational reform in Finland has been built upon ideas of good leadership that place an emphasis on teaching and learning, encouraging schools to craft optimal learning environments and implement educational content that best helps their students reach the general goals of schooling, and professional leadership of schools. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Pasi Sahlberg has worked since June 2007 as a Lead Education Specialist at the European Training Foundation, Torino, Italy. He was previously teacher, teacher educator, policy-maker and director in various positions in Finland before moving to work with World Bank in Washington, DC in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • The HOW, WHERE and WHY for Applying to the University of Lapland
    2007 – 2009 The HOW, WHERE and STUDY IN WHY for Applying to the University LAPLAND of Lapland. 1 STUDY IN LAPLAND 2007 – 2009 2 2007 – 2009 STUDY IN LAPLAND 3 STUDY IN LAPLAND 2007 – 2009 Editor: Pia Seppälä International Office The University of Lapland Photos: University of Lapland; City of Rovaniemi; Jouni Laaksomies, Jussi Leinonen, Arto Liiti, Mauri Pänttäjä and Juha Sarkkinen, Design and Layout: Teemu Matinlauri The University of Lapland reserves the right to change the regulations, programmes and course requirements presented in this publication without prior notice. ISSN 1797-0245 Tornio Kirjapaino Oy, Tornio 2007 4 Contents 1 University of Lapland 8 6 Student Union 47 1.1 General information 8 6.1 General information 47 1.2 Academic year 9 6.2 Student Union membership 47 1.3 International Services 6.3 Student Union activities 49 at the University of Lapland 11 6.4 Clubs and other student associations 51 1.4 Faculties 13 6.5 Student health issues and personal safety 51 1.5 Institutes 19 1.6 University administration 25 7 Finland, Lapland and the Finns 55 1.7 University premises 27 7.1 Finland 55 7.2 Lapland 58 2 Studying at the University of Lapland 28 7.3 The Finns 59 2.1 Universities in Finland 29 7.4 Tips on living in Finland 61 2.2 University degrees 29 2.3 System of study 29 8 Rovaniemi 62 2.4 OODI Student Information System 31 2.5 Studying at other universities – JOO studies 32 8.1 Rovaniemi AD 900 – 2007 63 2.6 Finnish Virtual University 32 8.2 Cultural life and attractions 63 8.3 Social life in Rovaniemi 66 8.4 Daily life
    [Show full text]
  • Equity in Education Thematic Review
    EQUITY IN EDUCATION THEMATIC REVIEW COUNTRY ANALYTICAL REPORT FINLAND Finnish Ministry of Education Mars 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: COUNTRY CONTEXT AND CURRENT EQUITY SITUATION .................................. 4 CHAPTER 1. CULTURAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS................................................................................ 4 1.1. Historical background..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Comprehensive school.................................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Confidence in the significance of education................................................................................... 5 1.4. Teachers’ social prestige................................................................................................................. 5 1.5. Social and cultural homogeneity..................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2. THE EDUCATION SYSTEM IN FINLAND......................................................................... 6 2.1. Pre-primary education..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Comprehensive school (basic education)........................................................................................ 7 2.3. Secondary education......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying Educational Programmes
    Classifying Educational Programmes Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries 1999 Edition ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Foreword As the structure of educational systems varies widely between countries, a framework to collect and report data on educational programmes with a similar level of educational content is a clear prerequisite for the production of internationally comparable education statistics and indicators. In 1997, a revised International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97) was adopted by the UNESCO General Conference. This multi-dimensional framework has the potential to greatly improve the comparability of education statistics – as data collected under this framework will allow for the comparison of educational programmes with similar levels of educational content – and to better reflect complex educational pathways in the OECD indicators. The purpose of Classifying Educational Programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries is to give clear guidance to OECD countries on how to implement the ISCED-97 framework in international data collections. First, this manual summarises the rationale for the revised ISCED framework, as well as the defining characteristics of the ISCED-97 levels and cross-classification categories for OECD countries, emphasising the criteria that define the boundaries between educational levels. The methodology for applying ISCED-97 in the national context that is described in this manual has been developed and agreed upon by the OECD/INES Technical Group, a working group on education statistics and indicators representing 29 OECD countries. The OECD Secretariat has also worked closely with both EUROSTAT and UNESCO to ensure that ISCED-97 will be implemented in a uniform manner across all countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish and Portuguese Parents' Perspectives on the Role Of
    education sciences Article Finnish and Portuguese Parents’ Perspectives on the Role of Teachers in Parent-Teacher Partnerships and Parental Engagement Cristiana Levinthal 1,* , Elina Kuusisto 2 and Kirsi Tirri 1 1 Department of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland; kirsi.tirri@helsinki.fi 2 Faculty of Education and Culture, Tampere University, 33100 Tampere, Finland; elina.kuusisto@tuni.fi * Correspondence: cristiana.levinthal@helsinki.fi Abstract: The current educational reforms in Finland and Portugal require a holistic engagement of parents with learning, bringing parents and teachers together as partners. This qualitative study, which interviewed Finnish (N = 10) and Portuguese (N = 9) parents, aimed to explore parents’ views on the role of teachers in supporting parent–teacher partnerships and parental engagement with the school. Inductive content analysis was performed to analyze the interviews. From a general stand- point, three patterns were found in the parents’ narratives about the role of teachers in supporting partnership and engagement: communication, professionalism, and invitations to active parental participation. From a cross-cultural standpoint, Finnish parents evidenced partnerships and engage- ment grounded in little face-to-face contact but consistent online communication with the teacher, as well as trust in their professionalism and independent work. The Portuguese parents revealed rather frequent active participation within the school premises, more recurrent face-to-face communication with the teacher, and appreciation for teachers’ timely responses and support. Recommendations Citation: Levinthal, C.; Kuusisto, E.; Tirri, K. Finnish and Portuguese for a holistic approach of engagement and partnerships were brought forward within the context of Parents’ Perspectives on the Role of teacher education, such as the need to maintain simple but regular communication with parents and Teachers in Parent-Teacher the relevance of reconsidering the frequency of parental activities in the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Irmeli Halinen: the New Educational Curriculum in Finland
    CHAPTER 6 by Irmeli Halinen THE NEW EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM IN FINLAND This chapter was published in the book entitled: Improving the Quality of Childhood in Europe · Volume 7 (pp. 75-89) Editors: Michiel Matthes, Lea Pulkkinen, Christopher Clouder, Belinda Heys Published by: Alliance for Childhood European Network Foundation, Brussels, Belgium · ISBN: 978-90-8229-092-9 © 2018 Alliance for Childhood European Network Foundation private stichting (foundation) · Text: © 2018 the authors Design: © 2018 Studio Marsel Stoopen · Brussels, Belgium · [email protected] | Print: Printon AS · Tallinn, Estonia All chapters are available for download on the website of the Alliance for Childhood European Network Group: www.allianceforchildhood.eu/publications ABSTRACT The chapter examines the starting points as well as the main goals and guidelines of the extensive curriculum reform process at all levels of education that Finland has just completed. The reforms were based on the existing strengths of the Finnish education system. Simultaneously, these reforms were focused on working against negative trends in education as well as meeting the challenges of the rapidly changing world and the unknown future. The actual process of the reforms is described in this chapter. The process was equally important as the final products, i.e. the core curricula documents. The process has had a strong influence on how the changes are now understood and accepted by all stakeholders in education and society, and how people are committed to carrying these out. The focus of the article is on students’ roles and experiences, especially in compulsory education. In the text the word ‘student’ is used to refer to FINLAND IN CURRICULUM EDUCATIONAL NEW THE children and young people from early childhood to the end of upper-secondary education (at the end of upper secondary school students are 18 to 19 years of age).
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Training Monitor 2019 Finland
    Education and Training Monitor 2019 Finland Education and Training Getting in touch with the EU Europe Direct is a service that answers your questions about the European Union. You can contact this service: • by freephone: 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (certain operators may charge for these calls), • at the following standard number: +32 22999696 or • by email via: https://europa.eu/european-union/contact_en Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 © European Union, 2019 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PRINT ISBN 978-92-76-09376-3 ISSN 2466-9989 doi: 10.2766/899636 NC-AN-19-009-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-76-09375-6 ISSN 2466-9997 doi: 10.2766/577427 NC-AN-19-009-EN-N Cover image: composition with images © istock.com EUROPEAN COMMISSION Education and Training Monitor 2019 Finland 2019 Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture EN Volume 2 of the Education and Training Monitor 2019 includes twenty-eight individual country reports. It builds on the most up-to-date quantitative and qualitative evidence to present and assess the main recent and ongoing policy measures in each EU Member State. It therefore complements other sources of information which offer descriptions of national education and training systems. Section 1 presents a statistical overview of the main education and training indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Matriculation Regulations Minimum Academic Entry Requirements 2021 and 2022 Contents 1
    NUI Matriculation Regulations 2021 and 2022 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND 49 Merrion Square National University of Ireland Dublin 2 T: (+353 1) 439 2424; @NUIMerrionSq F: (+353 1) 439 2466 [email protected] www.nui.ie NUI CONSTITUENT UNIVERSITIES – Na Comh-Ollscoileanna University College Dublin National University of Ireland, Galway An Coláiste Ollscoile, Baile Átha Cliath Ollscoil na hÉireann, Tel: (+353 1) 716 71608 Gaillimh, H91 TK33 Web: www.ucd.ie Tel: (+353 91) 524 411 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nuigalway.ie University College Cork Maynooth University Coláiste na hOllscoile, Ollscoil Mhá Nuad Corcaigh, T12 K8AF Tel: (+353 1) 708 6000 Tel: (+353 21) 490 3000/427 6871 Web: www.maynoothuniversity.ie Web: www.ucc.ie OTHER NUI MEMBER INSTITUTIONS – Baill Eile d’Ollscoil na hÉireann RECOGNISED COLLEGES – Na Coláistí Aitheanta Institute of Public Administration Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland An Foras Riaracháin Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Tel: (+353 1) 240 3600 Tel: (+353 1) 402 2100 Web: www.ipa.ie Web: www.rcsi.ie COLLEGES LINKED WITH CONSTITUENT UNIVERSITIES – Coláistí ceangailte leis na Comh-Ollscoileanna Shannon College of Hotel St. Angela’s College, Sligo Management Coláiste San Aingeal, Sligeach Coláiste Ósta na Sionnainne Tel: (+353 71) 914 3580 now a School in the College Web: www.stangelas.nuigalway.ie of Business, Public Policy and Law at NUI Galway Burren College of Art Tel: (+353 61) 712 210 Coláiste Ealáine Bhoirne Web: www.shannoncollege.com Tel: (+353 65) 707 7200 Web: www.burrencollege.ie National College of Art and Design, Dublin Institute of Banking Coláiste Náisiúnta Ealaíne is Deartha An Institiúid Baincéireachat Tel: (+353 1) 636 4200 Tel: (+353 1) 611 6500 Web: www.ncad.ie Web: www.iob.ie Matriculation Regulations Minimum Academic Entry Requirements 2021 and 2022 Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Colossal Loan Buys Time for Ireland
    ISSUE 47 (177) • 25 NOVEMBER – 1 DECEMBER 2010 • €3 • WWW.HELSINKITIMES.FI DOMESTIC BUSINESS LIFESTYLE CULTURE EAT & DRINK Anti-corruption The costs The art Ricardo Lamb, mechanisms and profits of public Trabulsi: beef criticised of winter speaking The Zapatistas or zebra? page 5 page 14 page 25 page 27 page 30 LEHTIKUVA / AFP PHOTO / PETER MUHLY This growth in cultural diversity has also resulted in a number of dif- L e a r n i n g t o ferent approaches to teaching the language, with courses around the country acknowledging the differ- speak ent learning methods of their stu- dents and fi nding new ways to make the same communicating in the local lan- guage a possibility for everyone. Amidst this new school of language thought can be found the underlin- ing truth, however, that the defi n- JAMES O’SULLIVAN ing factor that determines whether HELSINKI TIMES it is achievable or not is down to one thing: just how willing the student ALONG with an increase in the is to learn the language. number of immigrants living here Read more on pages 20-21. in Finland is the changing percep- tion regarding the possibility of for- This issue of eigners being able to communicate Helsinki Times has a special in the language often referred to as education theme. “too diffi cult” or even “impossible”, For more articles, with more and more people born see pages 18-25. outside of Finland speaking Finnish. A protestor stands outside the front gates of the Irish Prime Minister’s office in Dublin, Ireland on 22 November.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment in Finland: a Scholarly Reflection on One Country's Use Of
    GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP Assessment in Finland: A Scholarly Reflection on One Country’s Use of Formative, Summative, and Evaluative Practices KATIE A. HENDRICKSON Ohio University Finland’s high test scores have prompted international comparisons of educational policy. This article explores the use of assessment in Finland, particularly the intended use of student assessment and evaluation of schools as described in the National Curriculum. This article explores Finnish educational policy through the lens of formative and summative assessment in attempt to gain further understanding of the differences between Finland and the United States. Finland has recently received international attention for its students’ high performance on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Every three years, the PISA is administered to 15-year-old students in approximately 57 countries (Kupianinen, Hautamaki, & Karjalainen, 2009). Finland has scored first or second in mathematics on the past four administrations of the PISA and has the smallest variance across schools, meaning that Finland does not have a large achievement gap. Because policymakers and education reformers often assume that large-scale assessments are “indicators of the condition of school mathematics,” educational practices in Finland have been examined and compared to those in other countries (Dossey, 2007, p. 1435). Officials in many countries, including the United States, have visited Finland to try to determine why Finnish students have performed so highly on the assessment (de Lange, 2007). Kupianinen et al. (2009) suggest that Finland’s high scores on the PISA are due to a lack of high- stakes testing. Finnish students do not take a national, standardized high-stakes test until they matriculate secondary school and then only if they intend to enter higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Status in Finland
    Teacher status in Finland Foreword It is generally accepted that high quality teachers are a prerequisite for raising education standards and outcomes for children and young people. No society would discount the importance of education and investing in their future, but, in many countries, the teaching workforce is under pressure like never before: comparatively low pay; resource cuts; increased class sizes; more responsibilities; challenging student behaviour; greater student diversity. The teaching profession in many industrialised countries now faces a high degree of competition in attracting quality graduates. This is not the case in Finland, where teachers work in one of the most sought-after and respected professions in the country. Kantar Public, an independent social research agency, was commissioned by Google to explore the factors that underpin high teacher status in Finland, and to specifically identify what learning could be applied across other countries. A qualitative specialist from the Kantar Public Education Policy Group conducted a visit to Finland in March 2016, during which interviews were conducted with stakeholders from: Ministry of Education Finnish National Board of Education Kuntaliitto – The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities OAJ – Trade Union of Education Oulu University Teacher Training School University of Helsinki Jokirannan koulu (comprehensive school in Kiiminki) Ressun peruskoulu (comprehensive school in Helsinki) Rantakylän yhtenäiskoulu (comprehensive school in Mikkeli) Hauhon yhtenäiskoulu (comprehensive school in Hauho) To provide additional context to this qualitative research, a brief review of relevant literature (available in English and published between 2010 and 2016) was undertaken. This review was conducted to inform the development of discussion guides used in interviews and to aid analysis of the qualitative data collected.
    [Show full text]