Small Scale Dredging

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Small Scale Dredging SMALL SCALE DREDGING AN INTRODUCTION IT’S IN OUR NATURE Small-scale dredging TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION: SMALL-SCALE DREDGING………………………………………………………………….. 2 2. CRITERIA FOR SELECTING DREDGING TECHNIQUE……………………………………………………….. 3 3. DREDGING TECHNIQUES……………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 4. TRANSPORT OF DREDGED MATERIALS……………………………………………………………………….. 17 5. STORAGE OF DREDGED MATERIALS……………………………………………………………………………. 21 “Small-scale dredging” Conver 2014 1 / 22 Small-scale dredging 1. INTRODUCTION: SMALL-SCALE DREDGING The word dredging probably originates from the old English word “dragan”, or to draw. Dredged materials normally involve a layer of soft matter, which is formed when plants, waste, soil material and leaves cling to the bottom of waterways. In time, this can have an impact on shipping traffic or the capacity of the waterway in question. Dredging is carried out for a variety of reasons. However, in most cases, dredging is done for maintenance purposes and to ensure sufficient water flow. Small-scale dredging projects generally involve drainage channels and modified rivers in areas with artificial (pumped) drainage and smaller urban and suburban waterways, which are not used for shipping activities. Photos: Reduced water flow 2 / 22 Small-scale dredging 2. CRITERIA FOR SELECTING DREDGING TECHNIQUE A variety of dredging techniques have been developed over the years. When preparing for dredging activities, a decision must be made of which dredging technique is best suited to the activities in question. When doing so, the following factors must be taken into consideration: - composition of dredged materials - type and level of pollution - specific circumstances - size of project - acceptable opacification and spillage - required accuracy - side-effects - ecological considerations Composition of dredged materials The choice of dredging technique is also determined by the physical composition of the materials that must be dredged. For instance, different techniques must be used when dredging soft silt than when dredging sand or clay. Type and level of pollution Another factor which determines the choice of dredging technique is the presence of gross solids, like household and construction waste. Gross solids on the water bottom can reduce the effectiveness of certain dredging techniques. The level of pollution on the water bottom is generally not a decisive factor when deciding which dredging technique is going to be used. However, special dredging equipment has been developed to, for example, reduce unwanted dispersion and opacification during dredging activities. This equipment can be damaged by gross solids on the water bottom and cannot be used in all circumstances. The quality of (or level of pollution in) dredged materials determines whether materials can be placed at the water's edge or needs to be transported. Specific circumstances The choice of dredging technique is primarily determined by the accessibility, water depth, current speed and dimensions of the waterway in question. In urban areas, physical objects like lamp posts and parked cars are major obstacles for equipment operated from the banks of the waterway. This also applies to the width of waterways or the height of bridges when floating equipment is used. Size of project It may be necessary to dredge large stretches of water bottom when performing new infrastructure work, extracting sand and maintaining waterways. Project size is often expressed as “m3 in situ”. This refers to the volume of dredged material that must be removed. In addition, the surface area across which materials are spread, thus the layer thickness, also determines the capacity and cost of the deployed dredging technique. Acceptable opacification and spillage Materials are removed under water during the dredging process. Material released by a dredging technique, which is not subsequently disposed of via the transport system, is referred to as 'spillage'. Spillage is often manifested via a loose top layer, possibly featuring chunks of sediment. Spillage also results in a loose top layer when suspended particles (opacification) are subject to sedimentation. 3 / 22 Small-scale dredging However, polluted spillage is often encountered when dredging polluted water bottoms, which means it determines the chemical quality of the water bottom and the surface water. Accuracy There are two facets to the accuracy of a dredging technique. On the one hand, it involves the accuracy with which dredging takes place and, on the other hand, how accurately these newly dredged areas match the required profile. Accuracy is a criterion that can be clearly measured and checked. In general, it is assumed that opacification and spillage can be minimized if strict accuracy- related benchmarks are implemented. Side-effects In general, it is impossible to avoid unintentional effects of dredging activities, like opacification in the water column. However, contractors can take measures to reduce such effects, which includes installing silt screens. Other unintentional effects, like destruction of tow paths and noise-related nuisance, cause techniques with such side-effects to be avoided when working in vulnerable (natural) areas. These techniques will only be used if there are no viable alternatives, although the environment must be given maximum priority at all times. Ecological considerations There is an inter-woven relationship between ecology and dredging. Legislation relating to plants and wildlife imposes additional restrictions on available methods and available periods of the year. Therefore, ecological considerations must always be taken into account when performing dredging activities. Several dredging techniques or a combination of them may be suitable to successfully complete certain projects. That is why specifications often do not prescribe one particular technique, but only identify boundary conditions or the required end result. One statement is extremely important when it comes to small-scale dredging activities: “There is no such thing as a standard dredging project. Each project requires its own unique approach.” The following chapter will examine the most commonly used dredging techniques. 4 / 22 Small-scale dredging 3. DREDGING TECHNIQUES 3.1 Hydraulic excavator This commonly used piece of equipment - the hydraulic excavator - is a discontinuous excavator, where excavation takes place using single buckets in consecutive cycles. The full bucket is brought to the surface and emptied into the means of transport (truck or barge) or placed on the bank. Photo: Excavator on pontoon. The under-water surface is excavated in a circular pattern, where the bucket is lifted by the excavator when it reaches a certain depth. The next circle will be started once one circular section has been completed, and this process will continue until the whole waterway has been excavated. The excavator will then be moved, thus allowing another zone to be excavated or dredged. The bucket must be carefully positioned after each cycle so it is not easy to perform two consecutive excavation cycles under water without an accurate and reliable system for determining the excavation position. Water depth and working area There are two ways of implementing hydraulic excavator: - work carried out from the water's edge, - work carried out from a pontoon featuring anchors or spud poles. The eventual choice will be determined by project-specific circumstances. Depending on the selected method and the size of the excavator, it is possible to achieve water depths up to 10 m or more. Material above the waterline can also be excavated if the location is accessible to the excavation bucket and the means of transport. 5 / 22 Small-scale dredging Photo: Excavator on the bank. Available excavation buckets When using excavators to perform dredging activities in areas subject to nature-related and environmental considerations (for example, land improvement operations), various types of excavation buckets can be used to reduce excavation-related effects. Digging bucket A digging bucket excavates materials using a pulling movement and is thus often implemented to remove thin layers of silt. Once the bucket is full, it is raised to the surface and emptied into the means of transport or on to the water's edge. The dredging bucket is slightly different from standard buckets, and is characterized by holes that retain silt while allowing water to escape. Photo: Digging bucket and dredging bucket 6 / 22 Small-scale dredging The visor bucket The visor bucket is a traditional excavation bucket featuring a revolving valve (visor), which can be used to close the top of the bucket. The visor is closed once the bucket is full, so dredged materials are enclosed in the bucket while being raised to the surface. This avoids or drastically minimizes dredged material mixing with the water column. This bucket can be used to excavate thin and very dense layers with low water content. Layer thickness of around 0.5 m is needed in order to collect enough material. Photo: Visor bucket and clamshell The (closed) clamshell A clamshell or grab bucket operates using a gripping movement. That is why it is used when excavating thick layers of silt and when transferring materials. A traditional clamshell is open at the top, which means excavated materials are exposed to the water column when it is being raised to the surface. The top of closed clamshells can be sealed off, so exposure between excavated materials and the water column is avoided when it is being raised
Recommended publications
  • Construction Equipment
    CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT U.S. PRICE LIST COMPACT EXCAVATORS PL-200 MX SAP REVISION 11 EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014 THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC COPY ONLY – HARD COPIES WILL NOT BE DISTRIBUTED. This price list is intended for dealers with the Compact Excavators (MX) contract only. The prices included in this revision supersede any prices established prior to the effective date shown unless specifically identified in a price bulletin as superseding this price list. Below is a list of Family(s) and Model(s) that are included in this price list. Crawler Excavator (Mini) CX17B CX27B CX31B T4 FINAL CX36B T4 FINAL CX55B T4 FINAL PLEASE NOTE: Retain the price book pages of the discontinued series for your records. Copyright 2014 By CNH Industrial America LLC Page 1 of 44 (This page intentionally left blank) Page 2 of 44 General Information Prices shown herein are suggested prices only and in no way are they to be construed as limiting or restricting the dealer in his determination of the ultimate retail selling price. It is understood that the dealers are free to determine their selling price. Subject to any Federal, State or local laws. Where shown herein liquid capacities are U.S. measure unless otherwise noted. ADVANCE FREIGHT Advance freight will be added to the machinery invoice as a separate net charge for machinery shipped from field locations or from other than specified Ex Works locations. PRICES Prices are Ex Works factory, where the goods are manufactured, except where noted. For detailed information concerning prices, please refer to your OPERATING GUIDE. Prices and specifications are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • DNVGL-RU-SHIP Pt.5 Ch.10 Vessels for Special Operations
    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition July 2017 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 10 Vessels for special operations The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV GL AS ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV GL and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV GL's prior written consent. DNV GL is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is the officially binding version. DNV GL AS FOREWORD DNV GL rules for classification contain procedural and technical requirements related to obtaining and retaining a class certificate. The rules represent all requirements adopted by the Society as basis for classification. © DNV GL AS July 2017 Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of DNV GL, then DNV GL shall pay compensation to such person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million.
    [Show full text]
  • " (Acaw Ai O, 1 May 16, 1961 T
    May 16, 1961 T. T. UNDE 2,984,202 LASHING ARRANGEMENT FOR PUSHER TOWBOAT AND BARGE Filed Jan. 6, 1958 2 Sheets-Sheet INVENTOR. 77/CAMAS 7 AUWDA " (acAW ai O, 1 May 16, 1961 T. T. LUNDE 2,984,202 LASHING ARRANGEMENT FOR PUSHER TOWBOAT AND BARGE Filed Jan. 6, 1958 2. Sheets-Sheet 2 AF/G6 INVENTOR. 77/OMAS 7 A. WDA A77ORway 2,984,202 United States Patent Office Patented May 16, 1961 2 Fig. 3 is a schematic top elevational view of the barge and towboat; Fig. 4 is a side elevational view of the towboat pusher 2,984,202 plpe; LASHING ARRANGEMENT FOR PUSHER 5 Fig. 5 is a front elevational view of the towboat TOWBOAT AND BARGE pusher-pipe; Thomas T. Lunde, 233 Cervantes Blvd., Fig. 6 is an exploded perspective view of the barge San Francisco, Calif. pusher-block; Fig. 7 is a perspective view of the barge pusher-block Filed Jan. 6, 1958, Ser. No. 707,425 O engaged with the towboat pusher-pipe; and 10 Claims. (C. 114-235) Fig. 8 is a perspective view of a special towline fitting. Referring now specifically to Figs. 1, 2 and 3, a pusher towboat , of conventional design, is shown in pushing contact with a load-carrying barge 2, in its un This invention relates to a method and apparatus for 15 laden condition in Fig. 1 and in its laden condition in lashing a pusher vessel or towboat to a load-carrying Fig. 2 as illustrated by the relative freeboard indicated in pushed vessel or barge.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Nourishment Techniques: Report 1: Dredging Systems For
    BEACH NOURISHMENT TECHNIQUES R ep ort I DREDGING SYSTEMS FOR BEACH NOURISHMENT FROM OFFSHORE SOURCES by Thomas W. Richardson Hydraulics Laboratory U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station P. O. Box 631, Vicksburg, Miss. 39180 September 1976 Report I of a Series Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited TA 7 Prepared for Office, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army .W34t Washington, D. C. 2 0 3 14 H-76-13 1976 Voi. 1 C . 3 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LIBRARY DENVER, CO Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator. P.yi!P.A.y .P f RECLAMATION DENVER LIBRARY 92071163 o'5 i Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Date Entered) READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG NUMBER Technical Report H-76-13 4 . T I T L E (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED BEACH NOURISHMENT TECHNIQUES; Report 1, DREDGING SYSTEMS FOR BEACH NOURISHMENT Report 1 of a series FROM OFFSHORE SOURCES 6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. A U TH O R fsj 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERS Thomas W. Richardson 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK AREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Hydraulics Laboratory P. 0. Box 631, Vicksburg, Miss. 39180 11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE September 1976 Office, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army Washington, D. C. 2031** 13. NUMBER OF PAGES 83 1 4 . MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESSfi/ different from Controlling Office) 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally-Friendly Dredging in the Bisan-Seto Shipping Route
    Environmentally-friendly dredging in the Bisan-Seto Shipping Route Seiki Takano1, Kazuhiro Someya2, Hidetoshi Nishina3, Ryoichi Takao⁴ , Shinji Yamamoto⁵ , Yuji Inoue⁶ Abstract:Japan’s Bisan-Seto Shipping Route serves as both a key a route for domestic shipping between Osaka and Kyushu and as an international sea trade route. Between fiscal year 1963 and 1972, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport implemented a government-controlled program to improve this sea route. Approximately 38.4 million cubic meters of solids, including bedrock, were dredged to increase the depth of the northern shipping route to –19 m, the southern and connecting shipping route to –13 m, and the Mizushima Shipping Route to –17 m. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transtport performed every few years this dredging in response to the complex surrounding geography and tidal characteristics of the shipping route, which cause sediment build-up and reduce the functionality of the shipping route. The dredging involves barge-loading pump dredgers, with the dredged material loaded onto barges for transportation to disposal areas. This work lead to the overflow of turbid water from hopper of barges into surrounding sea areas, causing marine turbidity. The most recent Bisan-Seto Shipping Route dredging program was carried out over a five-year period, from fiscal year 2001 through 2005. The program incorporated studies on environmentally-friendly dredging methods that do not generate turbidity, leading to the selection of a method that recirculates overflow water from the barge to the dredger suction inlet, and realized an approach to prevent the generation of turbidity without reducing dredging efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • WARNING 3 TON HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR The
    WARNING 3 TON HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR Any piece of equipment can be dangerous if not operated properly. YOU are responsible for the safe operation of this equipment. The operator must carefully read and follow any warnings, safety signs and instructions provided with or located on the equipment. Do not remove, defeat, deface or render inoperable any of the safety devices or warnings on this equipment. If any safety devices or warnings have been removed, defeated, defaced, or rendered inoperable, DO NOT USE THIS EQUIPMENT!!! WARNING: Operating, servicing, and maintaining this equipment can expose you to chemicals including engine exhaust, carbon monoxide and lead, which are known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. To minimize your exposure, avoid breathing exhaust, do not idle the engine except as necessary, operate and service your equipment in a well-ventilated area and wear gloves or wash your hands frequently when servicing your equipment. For more information go to www.P65warnings.ca.gov WARNING! • Never operate power equipment of any kind if you are tired or if you are under the influence of alcohol, drugs, medication, or any substance that could affect your ability or judgment. Be alert! If you get tired while operating this equipment, take a break. Tiredness may result in loss of control. • Provide adequate ventilation when operating this equipment. Internal combustion engines consume oxygen and give off deadly carbon monoxide gas. • DANGER: This equipment has multiple pinch points that can cause dismemberment or death. Keep hands, feet and all other body parts clear at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • John Deere Construction Equipment Fleet Sheet
    EQUIPMENT FLEET 17G EXCAVATOR 345G LC EXCAVATOR 655K LOADER 304L LOADER 1720-kg (3,790 lb.) 35 700-kg (78,710 lb.) 116 kW (155 net hp) / 48 kW (65 net hp) / operating weight operating weight 1.6–1.9-m3 (2.1–2.4 cu. yd.) 0.8–1.6-m3 (1.0–2.1 cu. yd.) heaped bucket capacities heaped bucket capacities 26G EXCAVATOR 350G LC EXCAVATOR 2620–2770-kg (5,780– 36 131-kg (79,655 lb.) 755K LOADER 324L LOADER 6,110 lb.) operating weight operating weight 145 kW (194 net hp) / 52 kW (71 net hp) / 2.0–2.5-m3 (2.6–3.2 cu. yd.) 0.8–1.6-m3 (1.0–2.1 cu. yd.) heaped bucket capacities heaped bucket capacities 30G EXCAVATOR 380G LC EXCAVATOR 3105–3275-kg (6,850– 38 208-kg (84,234 lb.) 7,220 lb.) operating weight operating weight 317G COMPACT TRACK LOADER 344L LOADER 48.5 kW (65 gross hp) / 45.6 kW 76 kW (103 net hp) / (61 net hp) / 965-kg (2,125 lb.) 1.5–2.0-m3 (2.0–2.6 cu. yd.) rated operating capacity heaped bucket capacities 35G EXCAVATOR 470G LC EXCAVATOR 3520–3690-kg (7,760– 51 218-kg (112,916 lb.) 8,135 lb.) operating weight operating weight 325G COMPACT TRACK LOADER 444 P-TIER LOADER 54.8 kW (74 gross hp) / 52.5 kW 92 kW (124 net hp) / 3 670G LC EXCAVATOR (70 net hp) / 1176-kg (2,590 lb.) 1.9–3.4-m (2.5–4.5 cu.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Manual on Maritime Transport Statistics 1
    Reference Manual on Maritime Transport Statistics 1 2019 Reference Manual on Maritime Transport Statistics Version 4.1 (October 2019) Reference Manual on Maritime Transport Statistics 2 Reference Manual on Maritime Transport Statistics 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................7 PART I: METHODOLOGY, DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS .................................................................................8 3.1 Ports ................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 List of ports ................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.2 Port ............................................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.3 Statistical port (reporting port) .................................................................................................... 15 3.1.4 Main port .................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.5 Other port (data set A3) .............................................................................................................. 16 3.1.6 UN/LOCODE ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Everyday As a Bulldozer and Excavator Owner/Operator Is Tough
    (Left) Ryan Monteleone Excavation, Inc.’s new Cat D6R Fire Dozer purchased from Johnson Machinery. (Above) Ryan Monteleone, Owner, Ryan Monteleone Excavation, Inc. Written By: Brian Hoover Working everyday as a bulldozer Fire’s bulldozer training program located fighting fire with fire. After all fires are and excavator owner/operator is at the Clark Training Center in Riverside, extinguished, the dozer operator is tough work. Now try doing it while California. Applicants come from both then called upon to rehabilitate the surrounded by a blazing California the fire service and the construction previously bulldozed areas to protect wildfire. This is exactly what Ryan industry. Crews and individuals from against mudslides. Here dozers are Monteleone does for approximately all over California must become certified utilized along with excavators to 30 to 60 days each year. He and his and then renew their certification every cleanup and move debris for both two other operators sit confidently year. This intense training is necessary cosmetic and erosion control purposes. behind an enclosed cab, with almost due to the obvious dangers associated Ryan Monteleone of Ryan Monteleone zero visibility, protected only by fire with this trade. Like with any firefighter, Excavation, Inc. further explains his curtains. Much of wildfire confinement serious injury or death is always an interesting niche further, “We are can be attributed to heavy machine ongoing concern. These men and contracted through the U.S. Forestry operators like Ryan Monteleone, who women are called on by the California Service and CAL Fire as Fire Ready can work at preventing wildfires at an Department of Forestry to protect Bull Dozer operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Heavy Fuel Oil and Black Carbon in Arctic Shipping, 2015 to 2025
    Prevalence of heavy fuel oil and black carbon in Arctic shipping, 2015 to 2025 BRYAN COMER, NAYA OLMER, XIAOLI MAO, BISWAJOY ROY, DAN RUTHERFORD MAY 2017 www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank James J. Winebrake for his critical review and advice, along with our colleagues Joe Schultz, Jen Fela, and Fanta Kamakaté for their review and support. The authors would like to acknowledge exactEarth for providing satellite Automatic Identification System data and for data processing support. The authors sincerely thank the ClimateWorks Foundation for funding this study. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20005 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2017 International Council on Clean Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iv 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................1 1.1 Heavy fuel oil ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Black carbon .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Policy context ..................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Cat® 313F Hydraulic Excavator
    Cat® 313F Hydraulic Excavator The Cat® 313F excavator is a reliable and versatile solution for your light to medium duty applications. Featuring a fuel-effi cient Cat C4.4 engine, robust frames and components, and a state-of-the-art hydraulic system, the 313F allows you to move material all day with speed and precision. Not all features are available in all regions. Consult your Cat dealer for specifi c confi gurations available in your region. High Performance • Change your oil without the use of tools with the incorporated engine oil drain valve. • The Cat C 4.4 engine can run on biodiesel up to B2 0 and meets U.S. EPA Tier 4 Final and EU Stage IV emission standards with an • Three levels of fuel filtration protect the engine from dir t y fuel. af ter treatment system that requires no maintenance or downtime. • Blowing out debris is easy with wide clearance bet ween the • Two power modes – eco and high power – help you manage fuel radiator, oil cooler, and air conditioning condenser. for the work you need to do. • E x tract fluid samples for analysis quickly and easily with SM • Reduce engine speed and minimize fuel consumption during no-load S·O·S por ts. or light-load conditions with automatic engine speed control (AEC). • Engine idle shutdown allows you to set inter vals so you don’t Reliability and Durability You Can Count On waste fuel; it also helps reduce emissions and wear and tear on • Count on your machine to withstand wear throughout the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Backhoe Loader Specifications
    BACKHOE LOADER TLB840R SPECIFICATIONS DIMENSIONS ENGINE Deutz TCD 3.6 L4 (Tier 4 Final) – Torque rise 63% – Electronic fuel injection Cylinders 4 Capacity 219.6 in3 | 3.6 L Rated speed 2200 rpm Gross power @ 2200 rpm Cert. Rating to UN/ECE R120 74.0 hp | 55.4 kW Derived net rating @ 2200 rpm to ISO 14396 69.3 hp | 51.9 kW Max Torque @ 1300 rpm ISO 14396 288 lbf | 390 Nm * Nominal Non–certified Values ELECTRICAL External wiring and connectors meet IP69k standard Maintenance free battery 12 volt negative ground Battery isolator 95 amp alternator Blade type fuses 110 A/hr single battery with 920 CCA – EN Standard CAPACITIES Fuel tank 37 gal | 140 L Engine coolant 4.5 gal | 17 L Engine oil (including filter) 2.11 gal | 8 L Synchro Shuttle Transmission 5.3 gal | 20 L Rear axle (including final drives) 4.5 gal | 17.1 L Front axle (including final drives) 2.25 gal | 8.5 L Hydraulic tank 18.5 gal | 70 L AXLES AND BRAKES TURNING CIRCLES Outboard planetary final drives for easier servicing Over Tires Over Bucket Foot operated differential lock with 100% lockup 16° front axle oscillation to maintain maximum ground contact and traction Without brakes 25.75 ft | 7.9 m 35.75 ft | 10.9 m High capacity mounted wet disc brakes With brakes 23 ft | 7.0 m 32.6 ft | 10 m Self equalizing and self adjusting Depending on tire size Selectable 2 or 4 wheel braking Axle Ratings Max Static Loading Max Dynamic Loading HYDRAULIC SYSTEM Front 39342 lbs | 175 kN 15737 lbs | 90 kN Rear 42169 lbs | 187.5 kN 16861 lbs | 75 kN – Tandem gear pumps with inloader valve – Open centre
    [Show full text]