DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Rearing of Cutthroat Trout Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Rearing of Cutthroat Trout Technical Report Early Rearing of Cutthroat Trout Technical Report WESTERN REGIONAL AQUACULTURE CENTER Compiled by Gary Fornshell, University of Idaho Extension Christopher Myrick, Colorado State University United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1 2 PROJECT PARTICIPANTS Christopher Myrick, Colorado State University Mandi Brandt, Colorado State University Rick Barrows, US Department of Agriculture Ken Cline, Cline Trout Farms Gary Fornshell, University of Idaho Extension Greg Kindschi, US Fish and Wildlife Service Molly Webb, US Fish and Wildlife Service Kevin Kappenman, US Fish and Wildlife Service Jeremy Liley, Liley Fisheries, Inc. Photo credits: Cover: Dec Hogan/iStock/Thinkstock Above: U.S. Geological Survey/photo by Jonny Armstrong 3i TABLE OF CONTENTS Background 1 Native Cutthroat 2 Early Rearing Research 5 Optimizing Feed 5 Research Findings and Recommendations 5 Supplementing Live Artemia 6 Water Temperature 7 Rearing Density 8 Temperature Test Results 8 Rearing Density Test Results 10 Production Scale Trial 10 Cost-Benefit Matrix 11 Summary 11 Suggested Readings 12 Acknowledgments inside back cover 4ii FIGURES 1. Map showing the distribution of extant cutthroat trout subspecies in the western United States 4 2. Comparison of the effects of diet on the coloration of juvenile Colorado River cutthroat trout 7 3. A small-scale Artemia hatching system 8 4A. Effects of water temperature on the final wet weights of juvenile Snake River cutthroat trout 9 4B. Effects of water temperature on the final wet weights of juvenile Yelllowstone cutthroat trout 9 5A. Final wet weights of Colorado River cutthroat trout fed the regular Trout Co. #1 + Artermia 9 5B. Final wet weights of Colorado River cutthroat trout fed the Premium Trout Co. #3 + Artemia 9 TABLES 1. Primary state agency responsible for regulating aquaculture in the western United States 1 2. Protein and fat percentages of the feeds used in the cuttthroat trout early rearing study 5 3. Feeds used in the supplemental feeding trial with juvenile Snake River cutthroat trout 5 4. Final wet weights for Snake River, Yellowstone, and Colorado River cutthroat trout fed on a variety of commercially available or open-formula diets 6 5. Effects of rearing density on the growth of first-feeding Colorado River cutthroat trout 10 6. Cost-benefit matrix for Colorado River cutthroat fed one of three diet combinations 12 7. Cost-benefit matrix for Snake River cutthroat fed one of two diets 12 iii5 6 BACkgROUND The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of what is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series “ of occasions for hope. —John Buchan ” Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) are popular game species are allowed for propagation. Table 1 below lists the fish in the western United States. For private fish farmers, state agency responsible for regulating aquaculture in each they represent a potential high-value fish for profitable rec- of the western states. State aquaculture coordinators can reation-based aquaculture. Cutthroat trout are potentially provide information about aquaculture regulations. For more valuable for the recreational market than the more a directory of state coordinators, go to the National common rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) because Association of State Aquaculture Coordinators website they are in limited supply and are considered by some to (http://www.nasac.net/). Alternately, you can contact your be more aesthetically pleasing. County Extension Office for assistance. Propagation of cutthroat trout in public hatcheries is The Western Regional Aquaculture Center (WRAC) also necessary for conservation and restoration programs. recently completed a study on the economic contributions They are primarily produced for put-and-grow fisheries, thus placing a premium on high rates of fry and juvenile Table 1. Primary state agency responsible for regulating survival, and good fry quality (i.e., intact fins and oper- aquaculture* in the western United States. cula). However, insufficient knowledge of the optimal early rearing culture requirements has led fish culturists to use STATE DEPARTMENT conditions similar to those for rainbow trout with variable success. Arizona Department of Agriculture Lack of specific feeds for cutthroat trout is one factor California Department of Fish and Game that contributes to inconsistent and non-repeatable Colorado Department of Agriculture growth, survival, and quality from year to year. Two other critical factors that substantially influence fish perfor- Idaho Department of Agriculture mance are rearing temperature and rearing densities. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Optimizing early rearing by focusing on feed, water tem- Nevada Department of Wildlife perature, and rearing density should result in improved New Mexico Department of Game and Fish growth, quality, and survival. Ultimately, fish culturists Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife that optimize early rearing conditions for cutthroat trout will produce a fish desired by both customers of the Utah Department of Agriculture private recreation-based aquaculture sector and the public Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife hatcheries engaged in conservation and restoration efforts. Wyoming Department of Game and Fish Aquaculture producers of recreational fish are located * Some states have two departments co-regulate aquaculture throughout the western states with the majority in Cali- where one department may issue a fish propagation license fornia, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington. State regula- and another department regulates species allowed and impor- tions for private aquaculture production vary, including tation requirements. which state departments regulate aquaculture and which 1 of the private, recreation-based aquaculture industry in • Cutthroat trout are generally spring spawners, a trait the western United States (depts.washington.edu/wracuw/ that can increase the likelihood of hybridization (inter- research/starter-diets_trout.html). Western suppliers of breeding) with the closely related rainbow trout. recreational fish generate annual sales of $57.2 million and • Their natural diet consists primarily of insects (both 1237 jobs. The total annual economic contribution of this aquatic and terrestrial) and other aquatic invertebrates, important aquaculture sector in the West is $108.2 mil- though larger fish will also start to feed on other fish. lion. A variety of cold-, cool-, and warm-water species are • Because they are very closely related to rainbow trout, sold to recreational outlets, to brokers, as food fish, and to cutthroat trout readily interbreed to produce cuttbows, other markets. The majority of salmonids (88%) are sold a hybrid cross that can sometimes breed on its own. to public and private recreational outlets, such as private This propensity to hybridize with rainbow trout is fisheries, fishing clubs, municipalities, and home owner one of the reasons cutthroat trout subspecies declined associations. Only a small percentage of salmonids are throughout their range—as rainbow trout were intro- sold to brokerages. Almost all salmonids produced in the duced, the pure lines of cutthroat trout hybridized and western region are sold within the western states. declined in fitness, range, and abundance. • Like all trout and salmon, they build redds, typically NATIVE CUTTHROAT TROUT in the gravel of streams, rivers, or the inlets and outlets The western United States was home to a variety of of ponds and lakes. Egg incubation times vary with cutthroat trout (O. clarkii), including at least 11 distinct water temperature. subspecies or strains of which approximately 9 were still • All cutthroat trout are excellent sportfish, responding extant in 1992 (Figure 1). Historical distribution of cut- favorably to flies, lures, and bait. They are often prized throat trout subspecies included temperate rainforests by anglers for their coloration and vigorous fighting of the Pacific Northwest, pluvial basins within the Great abilities. Basin, subalpine areas of the Rocky Mountains, and high deserts of the Southwest. These fish, while closely related The focus of this paper is on the optimization of early to rainbow trout (O. mykiss), were found primarily in rearing techniques for three subspecies of cutthroat trout: inland drainages, while the strongholds of rainbow trout the Colorado River cutthroat trout (O. c. pleuriticus), the were the coastal drainages. The inland cutthroat trout Yellowstone cutthroat trout (O. c. bouvieri), and the Snake were able to take advantage of a diverse range of habitats River cutthroat trout (O. c.). These subspecies were chosen and occurred in everything from tiny headwater streams for a variety of reasons, including their availability in to large rivers and very large lakes (e.g., Lake Tahoe on large enough numbers to permit controlled laboratory the California–Nevada border). studies, their relationships to other cutthroat trout (e.g., Not surprisingly, this diverse group of habitats also the Colorado River cutthroat trout is closely related to led to a diverse set of life history strategies, with some the greenback cutthroat, O. c. stomias, and Rio Grande fish acting much like anadromous salmon, living in large cutthroat trout, O. c. virginalis), and the growing demand lakes and migrating into rivers to spawn, while others were from fish culturists for information on these species. resident in rivers and streams year-round. In terms of size, The Colorado River cutthroat trout
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of Western North America
    CItiEt'SW XHPYTD: RSOTLAITYWUAS 4 Monograph of ha, TEMPI, AZ The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo Of Western North America Robert J. Behnke "9! August 1979 z 141, ' 4,W \ " • ,1■\t 1,es. • . • • This_report was funded by USDA, Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service , Bureau of Land Management FORE WARD This monograph was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Behnke under contract funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. Region 2 of the Forest Service was assigned the lead in coordinating this effort for the Forest Service. Each agency assumed the responsibility for reproducing and distributing the monograph according to their needs. Appreciation is extended to the Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, for assistance in publication. Mr. Richard Moore, Region 2, served as Forest Service Coordinator. Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. Rocky Mountain Region September, 1980 Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. it TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in Spring Creek, Utah
    Spring Creek Population History of the Pyramid Lake Rediscovery (Again) Unfortunately, given its small size, the trout Lahontan Cutthroat population at Spring Creek has a very low In October 2009, a team from Weber State probability of survival. It lacks the numbers The Lahontan cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus University in conjunction with personnel and space necessary to maintain sufficient clarkii henshawi, is native to the Lahontan Basin from the DWR identified several specimens genetic diversity. It is believed that for a on the border between California and Nevada. believed to be of a pure or hybrid strain of mountain stream cutthroat population to For thousands of years it thrived and played the Pyramid Lake Lahontan cutthroat trout survive it must have a minimum of 3.3 km an important economic and cultural role in Spring Creek in Uintah, Utah. Using of habitat and an abundance in the area of among the Native American tribes of the electrofishers and dip nets, a 600 m stretch 0.3 fish per meter.3 Based on our region. The largest strain of this fish of the stream was sampled. A maximum observations, the Spring Creek population originated in Pyramid Lake, in western of 16 different individuals was collected in A Unique Environment has a maximum abundance of 0.1 fish/m Nevada and has reached recorded weights of two sampling trips. The fish appeared to Spring Creek’s unique vegetation and only 200 m of habitat. However, against up to 41 pounds, making it the largest “The Fish that Won’t Die” be restricted to a 200 m stretch.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout
    Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Existing Populations Lahontan cutthroat trout populations in the Coyote Lakes basin are remnant of a larger population inhabiting pluvial Lake Lahontan during the Pleistocene era. Hydrologic access routes of founding cutthroat trout from Lake Lahontan basin into the Coyote Lakes basin have yet to be described (Coffin and Cowan 1995). The Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU is comprised of five populations (Table 1). All populations express a resident life history strategy; however large individuals in the Willow and Whitehorse Complex populations suggest a migratory component may exist. Table 1. Populations, existence status, and life history of the Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU. Exist Population Description Life History Yes Willow Willow Creek and tributaries. Resident / Migratory Yes Whitehorse Complex Whitehorse and Little Whitehorse Creeks, and Resident / Migratory tributaries. Yes Doolittle Doolittle Creek above barrier. Resident Yes Cottonwood Cottonwood Creek above barrier. Resident Yes Antelope Antelope Creek. Resident Lahontan cutthroat trout from Willow and Whitehorse creeks were transplanted into Cottonwood Creek in 1971 and 1980, and into Antelope Creek in 1972 (Hanson et al. 1993). Whether Lahontan cutthroat trout were present in these creeks prior to stocking activities is disputed (Behnke 1992, Hanson et al. 1993, Coffin and Cowan 1995, K. Jones, ODFW Research Biologist, Corvallis, OR personal communication). For the purpose of this review these populations are considered native. Lahontan cutthroat trout were also transplanted into Fifteenmile Creek above a natural barrier (Hanson et al. 1993), but they did not establish a self- sustaining population (ODFW Aquatic Inventory Project, unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High-Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Andrew G. Talabere for the degree of Master of Science in Fisheries Science presented on November 21. 2002. Title: Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High-Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy Redacted for Privacy The distribution of Lahontan cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi was assessed in a high-desert stream in southeastern Oregon where beaver Castor canadensis are abundant. Longitudinal patterns of beaver ponds, habitat, temperature, and Lahontan cutthroat trout age group distribution were identified throughout Willow Creek. Three distinct stream segments were classified based on geomorphological characteristics. Four beaver-pond and four free-flowing sample sections were randomly located in each of the three stream segments. Beavers substantially altered the physical habitat of Willow Creek increasing the depth and width of available habitat. In contrast, there was no measurable effect on water temperature. The total number of Lahontan cutthroat trout per meter was significantly higher in beaver ponds than free-flowing sections. Although density (fish! m2) showed no statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase, values in beaver pondswere two-fold those of free-flowing sections. Age- 1 and young-of-the-year trout were absent or in very low numbers in lower Willow Creek because of elevated temperatures, but high numbers of age-2 and 3 (adults) Lahontan cutthroat trout were found in beaver ponds where water temperatures reached lethal levels (>24°C). Apparently survival is greater in beaver ponds than free-flowing sections as temperatures approach lethal limits. Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High- Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon by Andrew G.
    [Show full text]
  • Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Program Lahontan National Fish Hatchery Complex US Fish and Wildlife Service
    Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Program Lahontan National Fish Hatchery Complex US Fish and Wildlife Service Tahoe Working Group Meeting February 16, 2010 Presentation Outline ¾ Lahontan cutthroat trout –Background ¾ LCT reintroduction in Fallen Leaf Lake using adaptive management strategies ¾ Lake Tahoe Assessment Lahontan cutthroat trout –A Tahoe Legacy ¾ The only trout native to the basin ¾ Provided extensive recreational and commercial fisheries ¾ Extirpated from the basin in the 1930’s Pilot Peak LCT ¾ Represents the original Tahoe Basin strain based on genetic comparisons with museum specimens ¾ Exhibits ancestral life history characteristics Conservation and Recovery Efforts ¾ Recovery Plan in 1995 ¾ Short‐term Action Plans for Walker and Truckee Basins 2003 ¾ Formation of Tahoe Basin Recovery Implementation Team 2007 ¾ Recovery Implementation Plan 2010 Fallen Leaf Lake Research 2002‐2005 (FWS,UCD,UNR,UW) ¾ Stunted lake trout indicate resource limited system ¾ High shore angler catch rate of LCT ¾ Significant lake trout predation on stocked LCT ¾ Full compliment of native zooplankton species Fallen Leaf Lake Research 2007 (FWS,UNR) ¾ Refined lake trout abundance estimate: 8,799 lake trout (Schnabel) 95% CI = 4,990 –16,530 ¾ Identification of refugia from predation for LCT z Thermocline segregation z LCT refuge in woody debris ¾ Diet of lake trout dependent on size and time of year Adaptive management at Fallen Leaf Lake ¾ The challenges z Lake trout z Mysid shrimp z Over fishing ¾ The strategy z Improve stocking methods z Research lake
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II Quinn River Lahontan Cutthroat Trout
    Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Quinn River Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Existing Populations Lahontan cutthroat trout populations in the Quinn River basin are remnant of a larger population inhabiting pluvial Lake Lahontan during the Pleistocene era. The Quinn River Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU is comprised of four populations (Table 1). The McDermitt, Tenmile, and Oregon Canyon populations are considered extinct due to hybridization and introgression with non-native hatchery rainbow trout (Coffin and Cowan 1995, Bowers et al. 1994, ODFW Aquatic Inventory Project, unpublished data, R. Perkins, ODFW Ontario Field Office, personal communication). The McDermitt population was also subject to strong competition with brook trout in the headwater reaches and brown trout in the lower reaches. Lahontan cutthroat trout in the Sage population are isolated above a man-made partial barrier and express a resident life history strategy. Table 1. Populations, existence status, and life history of the Quinn River Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU. Exist Population Description Life History No McDermitt McDermitt, Cottonwood, Payne, Indian creeks , Riser creek -- and tributaries No Tenmile Tenmile Creek -- Yes Sage Sage and Line Canyon Creeks Resident No Oregon Canyon Oregon Canyon Creek -- Lahontan cutthroat trout from Sage Creek were transplanted into Tenmile Creek as a conservation measure. Since then they have hybridized with rainbow trout and pure Lahontan cutthroat trout no longer exist in Tenmile (R. Perkins, ODFW Ontario field office, pers. Comm..). Cutthroat trout were also introduced in Indian Creek (McDermitt population) in 1980 and 1981 (Hanson et al. 1993). Recent population surveys found cutthroat trout x rainbow trout hybrids in upper Indian Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Chances for Survival: Poor 2 Oncorhynchus Clarki Hensawi
    Lahontan Cutthroat Trout chances for survival: poor 2 Oncorhynchus clarki hensawi he lahontan cutthroat trout is a distinctive subspecies of cutthroat trout drainages on the east side of the sierra Nevada mountains. in California; however all but one suffer from geographic 1 2 3 4 5 TROUT in 1844, their distribution included 11 lake populations isolation and small population sizes. hatchery propagation native to the western Great basin. these fish are recognized by their occupying approximately 334,000 acres of lakes and other of lahontan cutthroats has been ongoing since 1939 and generally yellowish coloration, heavy black spotting, and red slash marks populations living in more than 3,600 miles of streams. continues today with releases of approximately 50,000 fish today, there are approximately 17 lakes and streams that a year. habitat alteration, abundant alien trout, and the loss Historic Range Of Lahontan Cutthroat t Trout under the jaw. lahontan cutthroats historically occurred in a wide variety of still contain lahontan cutthroats within their historical of inter-connected populations has left managers trying range and an additional nine creeks outside of their historic to recover a species with very little habitat available for stream and lake habitats, ranging from terminal alkaline lakes, such as pyramid native range. re-introductions. survival of the fish will require innovative aBundanCe: lahontan cutthroat populations in management, habitat restoration, and the elimination of and Walker lakes, to the clear alpine waters of lake tahoe and independence California most likely contain less than 200 adult fish each. competing species of trout from their streams. lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Truckee River Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Restoration Project 2015 Annual Report
    UTR Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Restoration Project – 2015 Annual Report (BO#:2008-F-0434-R001) Upper Truckee River Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Restoration Project 2015 Annual Report USDA Forest Service, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Lahontan cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarkii henshawi Written by Christopher Lemmers (Biological Science Technician) Reviewed by Sarah Muskopf (Aquatic Biologist) Reviewed / Approved by Holly Eddinger (Forest Biologist / Biological Program Leader) Page 1 of 18 UTR Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Restoration Project – 2015 Annual Report (BO#:2008-F-0434-R001) Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Results ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2015 Field Work ......................................................................................................................... 7 2008 - 2015 Progress .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in the Upper Truckee River
    Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in the Upper Truckee River: Restoration of a Threatened Species in a Fluvial Headwater Environment Project Area N Expansion Area .2008 -2011: beginning of manual removal of brook trout in additional 10 miles stream .Future - 2023: continue implementation in streams and begin removal of brook trout in 85 acres of lake Meiss Meadows .1988-1990: rotenone to remove brook trout .early 1990s: LCT re-introduced & brook trout found .mid 1990s: manual removal of brook trout in upper 5 miles stream & 8 acres lake .2007-2009: no brook trout found, resting treatment .one of the only high meadow LCT populations in Sierra Nevada Project Area Expansion Area Meiss Meadows Manual Removal Methods • Late August thru October • Delineated reaches by natural barriers (low water barriers, falls, and beaver dams) • 3-pass depletion, on varying reach lenght • Species identified and measured to size class • Brook and Rainbow trout sacrificed • Speckled dace returned to upstream reach • LCT returned upstream of Barrier T1BA4 in RL trib and 36B in UTR; sacrificed below due to hybridization threats 3 Pass Depletion Depletion B37-B36A (307 m) 30 LCT 20 BKT SPD 10 # of fish 0 1 2 3 Pass Depletion B34-B33 (254 m) 40 LCT 30 BKT 20 RBT # of fish 10 0 1 2 3 Pass Meiss Meadows LCT in Meiss Meadows Lahontan Cutthroat1996-2009 Trout Catch Upper Truckee River 1996 - 2009 2000 1500 Adult 1000 Juveniles 500 NUMBER OF NUMBER OBSERVED FISH 0 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 YEAR Brook Trout Catch in MeissBrook Meadows Trout Upper Truckee River1996 Electrofishing-2009
    [Show full text]
  • Greenback Cutthroat Trout Genetics and Meristics Studies Facilitated Expert Panel Workshop
    FINAL SUMMARY REPORT Greenback Cutthroat Trout Genetics and Meristics Studies Facilitated Expert Panel Workshop REGION 6 OFFICE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE May 12, 2014 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6, Mountain-Prairie Region Ecological Services - Colorado Field Office 134 Union Boulevard Lakewood, Colorado 80228-1807 Prepared by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 1819 Denver West Drive Suite 100 Golden, CO 80401 USFWS Order No. F13PB00113 AMEC Project No. 32106C002 Summary Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Background ......................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Expert Panel ........................................................................................................ 3 3.0 Workshop ............................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Essential Reading ........................................................................................... 2 3.2 Day One Summary ......................................................................................... 3 3.3 Day Two Summary ......................................................................................... 3 3.4 Day Three Summary ....................................................................................... 3 4.0 Summary of Expert Panel Responses
    [Show full text]
  • Life History of the Lahontan Cutthroat Trout, Salmo Clarki Henshawi, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 43 Number 1 Article 1 1-31-1983 Life history of the Lahontan cutthroat trout, Salmo clarki henshawi, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada William F. Sigler W. F. Sigler and Associates, Inc., Logan, Utah William T. Helm Utah State University Paul A. Kucera Nez perce Tribe, Lapwai, Idaho Steven Vigg University of Nevada System, Reno Gar W. Workman Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Sigler, William F.; Helm, William T.; Kucera, Paul A.; Vigg, Steven; and Workman, Gar W. (1983) "Life history of the Lahontan cutthroat trout, Salmo clarki henshawi, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 43 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol43/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 43 January 31, 1983 No. 1 LIFE HISTORY OF THE LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT, SALMO CLARKI HENSHAWI, IN PYRAMID LAKE, NEVADA William F. Sigler', William T. Helm^ Paul A. Kucera\ Steven Vigg*, and Gar W. Workman' Abstract.— The Pyramid Lake Lahontan cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki henshawi) population was sampled on a monthly basis from November 1975 through December 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Native Trout Initiative
    Western Native Trout Initiative Mission: “To serve as a key catalyst for the implementation of conservation or management actions, through partnerships and cooperative efforts, resulting in improved species status, improved aquatic habitats, and improved recreational opportunities for native trout anglers across western states”. Little Kern Golden trout Western Native Trout Initiative Focal species Alaskan Kokanee o Dolly Varden Alaskan Rainbow Trout o Gila Trout Apache Trout o Greenback Cutthroat Trout Arctic Char o Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Arctic Grayling o Little Kern Golden Trout o Paiute Cutthroat Trout Bonneville Cutthroat Trout o Redband Trout Bull Trout o Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout California Golden Trout o Westslope Cutthroat Trout Coastal Cutthroat Trout o Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Colorado River Cutthroat Western Native Trout Initiative WNTI Steering Committee = 15 members 9 western state agencies 3 federal agencies (USFWS, USFS, BLM) 1 conservation organization (Trout Unlimited) 1 tribal nation (vacant) 1 Canadian provincial agency (vacant) 1 staff person = Coordinator Programs/activities Fall grant program = large habitat projects (federal NFHP funding) Spring = Small Grants Program (other funds that we raise) Science and Data Campaign for Western Native Trout Western Native Trout Initiative From 2006-2017, WNTI has directed almost $5.5 million in federal fish habitat partnership funds leveraged to $25 million public and private matching dollars for 141 priority native trout conservation projects. 87 fish passage barriers removed 1,129 stream miles reconnected, restored or improved 30 barriers constructed to protect and conserve priority populations 671 watersheds or populations assessed Over 350 partnering organizations Western Native Trout Initiative WNTI Small Grants Program Since 2016: 26 small grants projects funded with $73,970 in donations to WNTI and matched with $1,080,953 in other funding.
    [Show full text]