DOCSLIB.ORG

Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide Third Edition Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide Third Edition Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide WISCONSIN LOCAL FOOD MARKETING GUIDE WISCONSIN LOCAL FOOD MARKETING GUIDE Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection Division of Agricultural Development Buy Local, Buy Wisconsin 2811 Agriculture Drive, PO Box 8911, Madison, WI 53708 [email protected] datcp.wi.gov THIRD EDITION A Producer’s Guide to Marketing Locally Grown Food Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide Publication Number: MK-DM-17 (rev.8/14) Third Edition The Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide This publication builds upon the research publication was made possible through the and efforts of the Minnesota Institute Introduction Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade of Sustainable Agriculture (MISA) and and Consumer Protection and the Buy Local, their publication, Marketing Local Food. Buy Wisconsin program, which strives to This project’s first installment was also increase the sale of Wisconsin food products to made possible by the north Central Risk local buyers. Management Education Center and continued through the Buy Local, Buy Wisconsin program funding. Copyright 2014, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Publication MK-DM-17 The publication is also available online at http://datcp.wisconsin.gov Search “Local Food Marketing Guide” Additional copies of the publication can be obtained by contacting: Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection- Buy Local, Buy Wisconsin Program 2811 Agriculture Drive, PO Box 8911, Madison, WI 53708-8911 [email protected] This information and content is provided for educational purposes only. Reference to any commercial products, trade names or specific individuals is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection is implied. Sections on Other Considerations for Setting up a Local Farm Business; Intellectual Property; and Taxation, Insurance, Labor, and Employment credited to and copyright shared with Rachel Armstrong- Executive Director and Attorney, Farm Commons and A. Bryan Endres- Professor of Agricultural Law, University of Illinois. 2 WISCONSIN LOCAL FOOD MARKETING GUIDE INTRODUCTION PUTTING A FACE AND A PLACE TO FOOD: LOCAL FOOD BRINGS RESURGENCE OF NEW AGRICULTURALISTS The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection is proud to present the third edition of the award-winning Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide. The Wisconsin Local Food Marketing Guide is intended as a resource for farmers and producers. It will acquaint you with some of the opportunities you can use to market your food products. You will learn from those who pioneered innovative production and marketing approaches. Understanding what’s involved in local food marketing will better prepare you for success. The first edition garnered the Wisconsin Library Association Government Roundtable’s Introduction Distinguished Document Award, and was one of twelve documents to receive the American Library’s Association’s Notable State Government Document award. HIGHLIGHTS OF ADDITIONS Chapter 1: New business development section New section on social media and marketing New section on registration and business contracts Chapter 2: New information on sales tax and food sampling laws for farmers markets New section on agritourism trails Chapter 3: New information and resources in grocery section New section on farm to school Chapter 4: Updated regulations From farmers markets to community supported agriculture, from artisan cheeses to branded meats, Wisconsin’s original entrepreneurs—its farmers—are reinvigorating agriculture in the state. These progressive farmers are transforming the landscape and culture of agriculture. Their influence is affecting how food is grown and how new food systems will be built. They are an important piece of Wisconsin agriculture, complementing the successful commercial agricultural industries built in Wisconsin. In the past, more people had a connection to the land as producing food was a necessity of life. Communities created festivals around the planting and harvesting seasons, beseeching good crops and bountiful harvests. Their lives and the lives of their neighbors were intimately connected to the harvest yields produced from their efforts. In the past century, as rural populations gravitated toward urban centers, many of the WISCONSIN LOCAL FOOD MARKETING GUIDE 3 connections people traditionally had with the land became strained and even broken. Today, the average U.S. citizen is three generations removed from production agriculture. Without the direct connection to growing food themselves, consumers have begun expressing an interest in knowing where and how their food is produced and grown. This desire to make a food connection has linked food producers and consumers. Local food production is a groundswell sweeping across the state’s countryside and inside urban areas, creating opportunities for Wisconsin farmers. New customers are streaming to farmers markets, seeking not only Department of Agriculture, many large retail farm-fresh produce but also a connection to chains have made efforts to locally source their 3 the land on which it is grown. Studies have products. shown that consumers are increasingly looking This expanding demand has shown itself in for food diversity, freshness, and ties to food both direct and indirect markets. Between producers.1 2009 and 2010, the number of farmers markets Consumers are rediscovering the bounty in the United States grew by 16 percent, 4 grown in Wisconsin. From garden vegetables to 6,132 from 5,274. The 2007 Census of to fruit trees; from honey and maple syrup Agriculture found that Wisconsin is home to to meat products; from restaurant creations 437 farms that market their products through sourcing local foods to simple, home-cooked Community Supported Agriculture, ranking meals, a new food landscape is appearing on seventh out of all fifty states. Restaurants Wisconsin’s tables. As Wisconsin witnesses are also a large purchaser of local food: the and participates in this expansion of local National Restaurant Association’s 2008 “fine food production, a resurgence of textures and dining” operator survey found that 89 percent flavors is surfacing to benefit both producers of operators offered locally grown or locally and consumers. made items, and 90 percent believed local food Introduction would become more popular in the future. The timing has never been better to enter the local food production systems in Wisconsin. The range of local agricultural products available has expanded as farmers have Increased consumer demand, interest responded to the public’s interest in the food in preparing healthy meals, information appearing on their plates. As consumers’ desire availability, and expertise willingly shared with to reconnect to their food drives their buying new producers have changed the dynamics so choices, farmers are presented not only with that small- and large-scale farmers, alike, can new opportunities to meet that demand, but thrive in the marketplace. also an opportunity to tell the stories of their farms, lifestyles, and philosophies. Recent polls and studies reveal the local food trend. Nearly everyone, from local consumers These expanding markets provide excellent to large chain stores, is taking part at some potential for new and existing producers. level. A 2008 survey found that 82 percent of The scope of Wisconsin’s production diversity American consumers had purchased local food, covers many areas, and each new producer while only seven percent had not.2 According brings a unique set of skills and perspective to to an analysis conducted by the U.S. the table. 1 Food Marketing Institute. 2009. U.S. Grocery Shopper 3 Martinez, S. et al. 2010. “Local Food Systems: Con- Trends, Food Marketing Institute: Arlington, VA. cepts, Impacts, and Issues.” U.S. Department of Agricul- 2 Onozaka, Y., Nurse, G., and D. Thilmany McFadden. ture Economic Research Report 97. 2010. “Local Food Consumers: How Motivations and 4 U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2010. “USDA An- Perceptions Translate to Buying Behavior.” Choices, nounces that National Farmers Market Directory Totals Vol. 25. 6,132 Farmers Markets In 2010.” News Release 0390.10. 4 WISCONSIN LOCAL FOOD MARKETING GUIDE Table of Contents Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................7 Gathering Information .................................................................................................. 7 Business Decisions and Planning .................................................................................. 9 Other Considerations for Setting Up a Local Farm Business ................................... 15 Farm Registration Requirements ................................................................................ 18 Environmental Issues ................................................................................................... 20 Setting Prices for Various Markets .............................................................................. 23 Business Development ................................................................................................. 26 Adding Value To Your Products .................................................................................. 35 Chapter 2 ......................................................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study Author(S): Christopher P
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study Author(s): Christopher P. Krebs, Ph.D. ; Christine H. Lindquist, Ph.D. ; Tara D. Warner, M.A. ; Bonnie S. Fisher, Ph.D. ; Sandra L. Martin, Ph.D. Document No.: 221153 Date Received: December 2007 Award Number: 2004-WG-BX-0010 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. October 2007 The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study Final Report NIJ Grant No. 2004-WG-BX-0010 Performance Period: January 2005 through December 2007 Prepared for National Institute of Justice 810 Seventh Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Prepared by Christopher P. Krebs, Ph.D. Christine H. Lindquist, Ph.D. Tara D. Warner, M.A. RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Bonnie S. Fisher, Ph.D. University of Cincinnati Sandra L.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Analysis of Protein Folding Thermodynamics for Disease State Characterization
    Global Analysis of Protein Folding Thermodynamics for Disease State Characterization and Biomarker Discovery by Jagat Adhikari Department of Biochemistry Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael C. Fitzgerald, Supervisor ___________________________ Kenneth Kreuzer ___________________________ Terrence G. Oas ___________________________ Jiyong Hong ___________________________ Seok-Yong Lee Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biochemistry in the Graduate School of Duke University 2015 ABSTRACT Global Analysis of Protein Folding Thermodynamics for Disease State Characterization and Biomarker Discovery by Jagat Adhikari Department of Biochemistry Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael C. Fitzgerald, Supervisor ___________________________ Kenneth Kreuzer ___________________________ Terrence G. Oas ___________________________ Jiyong Hong ___________________________ Seok-Yong Lee An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biochemistry in the Graduate School of Duke University 2015 Copyright by Jagat Adhikari 2015 Abstract Protein biomarkers can facilitate the diagnosis of many diseases such as cancer and they can be important for the development of effective therapeutic interventions. Current large-scale biomarker discovery and disease state characterization
    [Show full text]
  • Alite Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement: Chemistry and Thermodynamics
    This is a repository copy of Alite calcium sulfoaluminate cement: chemistry and thermodynamics. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/144183/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Hanein, T. orcid.org/0000-0002-3009-703X, Duvallet, T.Y., Jewell, R.B. et al. (5 more authors) (2019) Alite calcium sulfoaluminate cement: chemistry and thermodynamics. Advances in Cement Research, 31 (3). pp. 94-105. ISSN 0951-7197 https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.18.00118 © 2019 ICE Publishing. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Advances in Cement Research. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Abstract: Calcium sulfoaluminate (C$A) cement is a binder of increasing interest to the cement industry and as such is undergoing rapid development. Current formulations do not contain alite; however, it can be shown that hybrid C$A-alite cements can combine the favourable characteristics of Portland cement with those of C$A cement while also having a lower carbon footprint than the current generation of Portland cement clinkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Nonpoint Source Critical Source Area Contributions at the Watershed Scale
    TECHNICAL REPORTS:TECHNICAL SURFACE REPORTS WATER QUALITY Evaluating Nonpoint Source Critical Source Area Contributions at the Watershed Scale Michael J. White* USDA-ARS Daniel E. Storm and Philip R. Busteed Oklahoma State University Scott H. Stoodley AMEC Earth & Environmental Shannon J. Phillips Oklahoma Conservation Commission Areas with disproportionately high pollutant losses (i.e., ater quality impairment due to sediment and nutrients is a critical source areas [CSAs]) have been widely recognized as serious problem in the USA. In 2002, 45% of streams and priority areas for the control of nonpoint-source pollution. Th e W identifi cation and evaluation of CSAs at the watershed scale rivers and 47% of lakes and reservoirs were listed as impaired and allows state and federal programs to implement soil and water unable to support their designated uses (USEPA, 2007). Agricultural conservation measures where they are needed most. Despite production is the leading source of impairment for streams and rivers many potential advantages, many state and federal conservation in the USA (USEPA, 2007). Conservation practices can signifi cantly programs do not actively target CSAs. Th ere is a lack of reduce nonpoint-source pollution, but to be eff ective, appropriate research identifying the total CSA pollutant contribution at the watershed scale, and there is no quantitative assessment practices must be located to prevent the mobilization of pollutants or of program eff ectiveness if CSAs are actively targeted. Th e intercept them en route to streams. Th e placement of these practices purpose of this research was to identify and quantify sediment within a watershed signifi cantly infl uences their overall eff ectiveness and total phosphorus loads originating from CSAs at the (Gitau et al., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Re-Localised and Resilient Food Systems: Challenges and Opportunities in Europe
    Towards re-localised and resilient food systems: challenges and opportunities in Europe Michel Pimbert Centre for Agroecology and Food Security, Coventry University UK Local food initiatives growing in Europe • Local Food Systems - production, processing, trade and consumption of food occur in a defined reduced geographical area • Short Food Supply Chain - the number of intermediaries is minimised, the ideal being a direct contact between the producer and the consumer. Study of 84 different SFSCs in Europe (Kneafsey et al, 2013) • CSA and AMAPs • Sell mainly to local • farm shops, pick-your- and /or regional own schemes… markets • farmers' markets, shops • Products traded: fresh owned by farmers, fruit and vegetables, farm-based delivery animal products (meat, schemes, or through dairy), beverages one single trade • Urban-driven schemes intermediary have grown rapidly in • Farmer link with public recent years in procurement scheme comparison with rural SFSCs Social impacts Economic impacts • SFSCs and LFS favor • Benefits for rural the closer connection development and between farmers and economic regeneration consumers • LFS and SFSC - higher • Development of trust multiplier effect on local and social bonds - a economies than long sense of community chains, with impacts and of 'living-together’ also on maintaining local • Behavioral changes: employment, particularly eating habits with public in rural areas health effect (reduced • A higher share of value obesity) added is retained locally by producers Environmental impacts • Local: reduced GHG emissions associated with transportation • Seasonal: Reduced GHG emissions involved in storage • Ecological production methods: reduced GHG involved in production; reduced pesticide use, reduced soil and water pollution, enhanced biodiversity, minimum processing (reduces GHG in processing & storage) Towards re-localised food systems and circular economy models • Appropriate scale and technology e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Serving Local Food on Your Menu1
    A GUIDE TO SERVING LOCAL FOOD ON YOUR MENU Quick Tips to Serving Local Food on Your Menu: 1. Start small—during the growing season, replace foods that you already serve with the same product from local farmers. 2. Learn about local agriculture—visit farmers markets, call your Cooperative Extension office, and find out what organizations work with farmers in your area. See the Resources section of this Guide for suggestions on how to find farmers near you. 3. Visit each other—tour farms and invite farmers to your facility to gain better insight into how you can work together. 4. Work through your existing distributors—ask if they offer any local products and encourage them to do so or to do more. 5. Be patient—buying local can be rewarding yet challenging, so be flexible and set realistic expectations and goals. 6. Advertise—let your customers know what your are doing by labeling foods that come from local farms and tell stories about the products and their producers. A Guide to Serving Local Food on Your Menu1 INTRODUCTION The demand for fresh, local food has been growing rapidly in recent years, spurred by celebrity chefs, farmers’ markets, Buy Fresh, Buy Local campaigns, and other initiatives. Institutions of various kinds have begun to respond to this demand. In one well known example, the media attention received by the local foods project begun in one dining hall at Yale University has made other schools aware that serving fresh, local food can give them a competitive edge when recruiting students. As a result, many colleges and universities across the country have begun to feature their use of local foods.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability for Food Consumers: Which Perception?
    sustainability Article Sustainability for Food Consumers: Which Perception? Cristiana Peano 1 , Valentina Maria Merlino 1,* , Francesco Sottile 2 , Danielle Borra 1 and Stefano Massaglia 1 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Univerity of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy; [email protected] (C.P.); [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (S.M.) 2 Dipartimento di Architettura, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 14, 90128 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 August 2019; Accepted: 19 October 2019; Published: 25 October 2019 Abstract: A sustainable future for the community is one of the objectives established by the European Union Agenda 2030. Furthermore, sustainable consumption has been identified as one of the possible trajectories for sustainable development. It is for this reason that food production, distribution and consumption ways cannot be overlooked for sustainability achievement, as well as the consumer’s related perception. In this research the Best–Worst scaling methodology was adopted to explore the priorities declared by a sample of 801 consumers among 12 different sustainability definitions selected from the scientific literature. The choice experiment was carried out through face-to-face interviews during two food and wine events closely related to the sustainability theme in the food sector. The respondents considered as sustainability priority definition the “preservation of natural resources”, followed by “decent working conditions” and “accessibility for everyone to healthy and safe food”. Moreover, 5 consumer’s clusters were identified according to the priorities assigned to the different sustainability definitions, as well as to individuals socio-demographic characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and International Examples of How Sustainable Communities Can and Do Work
    Environment 24 Local and international examples of how sustainable communities can and do work Morag Gamble SEED International Email: [email protected] www.SEEDinternational.com.au What is a sustainable neighbourhood? What does it look like? What are it’s features? How are local communities around the world making it a reality? INTRODUCTION For the first time in human history, more than half of the global population live in urban environments. To sustain urban habitats and their inhabitants, we must plan, design and think of cities as ecological systems, create healthy urban metabolisms and reconsider the relationship between cities and their hinterland. Climate change, peaking oil supplies, increasing levels of pollution, scarcity of fresh water, biodiversity loss, toxic food scares, and escalating violence are just some of the reasons why new patterns of urban living need to be developed. There is a great potential in urban areas to produce more, waste less and contribute to the ecological balance (restoration of the urban metabolism). Cities can become cyclers instead of sinks. The settlements we live in affect the choices we make and the way we live, as well as the level of impact we have on the planet's finite resources. A radical shift is required in the current approach to the design of human settlements and the food systems that feed the populations. WHAT IS A SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY? “Sustainable communities live in social, cultural and physical environments in which needs and aspirations can be satisfied without diminishing the chances of future generations. A sustainable human community is designed in such a way that its ways of life, businesses, economy, physical structures, and technologies do not interfere with nature’s inherent ability to sustain life.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: What Makes Local Food At- Tractive to Consumers?
    Chapter 6: What makes local food at- tractive to consumers? Andreas Håkansson In order to understand the potential of local and regional food, we must first understand what it is about these goods that attract consumers. This chapter summarizes the research on what drives local food consumption, starting from an overview of the motivations of the consumers themselves and different descriptions of what characterizes consumers of local food (“locavore“), and continuing with potential explanations for underlying motives. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in local and regional food: inte- rest from researchers and government officials, but also from food producers. Local farmers markets are springing up in communities in many areas of the industrialized world, including the south Baltic region. This increase is coupled with an increased consumer demand in local and regional food throughout the region. In this chapter we investigate why consumers are now demanding local foods. An increased un- derstanding would help to better understand the potential of local food from both a political perspective, and, from a marketing one, help to market existing and deve- lop new local and regional food products. Effective demand Before discussing motivations, it is important to first define what is meant by saying that consumers have a demand for local food. Demand (or effective demand, to be more precise) is a technical term defined as a willingness linked to an ability to pay for a good or service at a given price. It should be separated from having an interest in something or in preferring to have something only if it could be obtained at no additional cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Food Consumers
    Local food consumers Who are they and what drives them? Irene Leemans 900721506100 MSc. Thesis Marketing and Consumer Behaviour MSc. Management, Economics and Consumer Studies Specialisation Consumer Studies Irene Leemans, 900721506100 Supervisor: Hans van Trijp Second reader: Frans Verhees MCB-code 80436 0 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Context ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Local food benefits .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 The acceptance of local food among Western consumers ....................................................... 4 1.4 Knowledge gap .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Moderators of consumer behaviour ......................................................................................... 4 2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 What is local? Defining the concept of local foods ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CSA B52HB:20 a Practical Handbook for Implementing CSA B52:18, Mechanical Refrigeration Code
    A practical handbook for implementing CSA B52:18, Mechanical refrigeration code CSA B52HB:20 Legal Notice This document is provided by the Canadian Standards Association (operating as “CSA Group”) as a convenience only. Disclaimer and exclusion of liability This document is provided without any representations, warranties, or conditions of any kind, express or implied, including, without limitation, implied warranties or conditions concerning this document’s fitness for a particular purpose or use, its merchantability, or its noninfringement of any third party’s intellectual property rights. CSA Group does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or currency of any of the information published in this document. CSA Group makes no representations or warranties regarding this document’s compliance with any applicable statute, rule, or regulation. IN NO EVENT SHALL CSA GROUP, ITS VOLUNTEERS, MEMBERS, SUBSIDIARIES, OR AFFILIATED COMPANIES, OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, DIRECTORS, OR OFFICERS, BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INJURY, LOSS, COSTS, OR EXPENSES, HOWSOEVER CAUSED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, LOST REVENUE, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOST OR DAMAGED DATA, OR ANY OTHER COMMERCIAL OR ECONOMIC LOSS, WHETHER BASED IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), OR ANY OTHER THEORY OF LIABILITY, ARISING OUT OF OR RESULTING FROM ACCESS TO OR POSSESSION OR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT, EVEN IF CSA GROUP HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, INJURY, LOSS, COSTS, OR EXPENSES. In publishing and making this document available, CSA Group is not undertaking to render professional or other services for or on behalf of any person or entity or to perform any duty owed by any person or entity to another person or entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumers' Preferences for Locally Produced Food: a Study in Southeast Missouri
    Consumers' preferences for locally produced food: A study in southeast Missouri Cheryl Brown Abstract. A mail survey was used to gather information from the main food buyer in random households in southeast Missouri to analyze consumer preferences for locally grown food. A majority of shoppers in the region were not aware of the state's AgriMissouri promotion program. Consumers de®ned locally grown not as a statewide concept but as a narrower regional concept that could cross state boundaries. Most important when purchasing produce were quality and freshness, and most consumers perceived local produce at farmers' markets to be of higher quality and lower price. Farm households were not signi®cantly different from other households in the region and did not show a prefer- ence or willingness to pay a price premium for local food products. Food buyers who were members of an environ- mental group had higher education and income and were more likely to purchase organic food and more willing to pay a higher price for local produce. Households in which someone was raised on a farm, or had parents who were raised on a farm, had a preference for locally grown food and were willing to pay a price premium for it. Marketing local products should stress quality, freshness, and price competitiveness, and appeal to environmentalists and those with a favorable attitude towards family farms. Key words: consumer attitudes, consumer behavior, consumer mail survey, direct marketing, farmers' markets, food marketing, willingness to pay Introduction the state, with several in or near the major metropolitan areas of Kansas City and St.
    [Show full text]