Milton's Literary Reputation During the Victorian Era. Calvin Huckabay Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1955 Milton's Literary Reputation During the Victorian Era. Calvin Huckabay Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Huckabay, Calvin, "Milton's Literary Reputation During the Victorian Era." (1955). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8147. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8147 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MILTON*S LITERARY REPUTATION DURING THE VICTORIAN ERA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Meohanioal College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English by Calvin Huokabay B. A ., Louisiana College, 1949 M, A,, Tulane University, 1950 June, 1956 UMI Number: DP69525 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP69525 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code uest ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT MANUSCR IPT THESES [* NP UR L i SHE P THESE9 SUBMITTED FOR THE MASTER'S A NO DOCTOR'S DEGREES A.VD DEPOSITED I N THE LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY L ID R A RY ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION. USE OF ANY THESIS IS LIMITED BY THE RIGHTS OF THE AUTHOR. D IBL I 0GRAPH1CAL REFERENCES MAY BE NOTED, BUT PASSAGES MAY NOT B E ’COPIED UNLESS THE AUTHOR HAS GIVEN PERMISSION. C r e d i t must be given in s u b s e q u e n t w r i t t e n or p u b l i s h e d w o r k . A LIBRARY WH1XH BORROWS THIS THESIS FOR USE BY JTS CLIENTELE \£L» IS EXPECTED TO MAKE SURE 'THAT THE BORROWER IS AWARE OF THE ABOVE RESTRICT IONS . LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY I I 9 — A controversies* Later critics made allowances for Milton1s BuppoBed inhumanity to man, and a few brought forth documentary proof to show that % he had been kind and gentle* The extent of Milton's Puritanism was debated, but no appreciable degree of agreement was reached* Some critics were beginning to interpret him as a Christian humanist* Milton's reputation, as a poet remained stable. The later critics ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to trace Milton's literary reputation in England from the appearance of Macaulay's Essay on Milton (1826) to the publication of Walter Raleigh's Milton (1900)• I maintain as a fundamental premise that Milton remained one of England's "accepted" writers throughout the period, that there is no Justification for the idea that the Miltonio tradition deolined during those years. Victorian scholarship on Milton alone attests to his standing as a man of letters. His works were edited and re-edited. The Victorians wrote more than a score of critical biographies of Milton, and his poetry was always a lively topic of disoussion in the Journals. Political analysts drew upon his prestige as a writer to strengthen their arguments for reform bills. Some scholars studied Milton's source materials ex tensively. Several Milton concordances and bibliographies were compiled. His prosody was analyzed in detail. In what amounted to a reinterpretation of Milton the man, there was 4 \ a shift from Milton idolatry to a more critioal attitude. Several critics disparaged the man because of his domestic difficulties and political controversies. Later critics made allowances for Milton's supposed inhumanity to man, and a few brought forth documentary proof to show that he had been kind and gentle. The extent of Milton's Puritanism was debated, but no appreciable degree of agreement was reaohed. Some critics were beginning to interpret him as a Christian humanist. Milton's reputation as a poet remained stable. The later critics veered away from the eighteenth-oentury idea that Paradise Lost Is a devotional poem, but no one interpreted oorrectly its central meaning. There was universal agreement that the metrios of Paradise Lost exhibit flawless excellence. The late Victorians neglected the oontent of the epic, Satan's position in Paradise Lost was debated throughout the era. The oritios neglected Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes, When they mentioned these poems, they usually compared them unfavorably with Paradise Lost. Only one critic came close to an interpretation of the central meaning of Samson Agonistes; the others merely noticed parallels between Samson and the poet, L*Allegro, II Penseroso, Comug, and Lyoidas were never studied in any detail, but they were often mentioned in glowing terms. In short, Milton's reputation as a poet was maintained beoause of the recognised merits of Paradise Lost, Milton's polemical pamphlets received even less attention than the shorter poems. The early Victorians did not discuss the prose as lit erature, They either tried to show the correctness of Milton's ideas or attempted to prove that he had been in error. After 1855, however, critics became conscious of Milton's prose style and oited the purple passages for their poetic language. In 1900, commentators were beginning t. to appreciate the timeless truths and high ideals presented in the pamphlets, Milton the philosopher fared well during the Victorian era. It is true that some critics thought that ParadiBe Lost had become a monument to dead ideas, but they were in the minority. The late Victorian years witnessed, of oourse, a reassessment of traditional values, and It was quite natural that the relevanoe of Paradise Lost as a philosophical poem be questioned* De Dootrlna Christiana neither added to nor subtracted from Milton’s reputation as a thinker* Most of the oritios over-emphasised the here sies of that work* It is significant that with the exception of Channing and other Unitarians, De Doctrina Christiana was never lauded as a liberal Christian document* By 1900, many writers had noticed the value of the treatise as a commentary on Paradise Lost. At the close of the Victorian era there was little or no agreement on several aspects of Milton’s personality and works; the general disa greement reflected the complexity of almost every problem involving the poet* % ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my appreoi&tion to all those who have enoouraged me in the pursuit of this study• Mr. Esmond L. Mari 11 a, who directed it, has been most helpful in his suggestions and guidance. I am also indebted to Messrs. Thomas A. Kirby, John Hasard Wildman, and Walter C. Richardson for their advice. The staff of the Hill Memorial Library have been most cooperative, but Misses Ruth Walling, Anni* B. Colson, and Marjorie Karlaon of the Reference Department deserve speoial thanks. Finally, I desire to acknowledge the patience, fortitude, and under standing of my wife during our years at Louisiana State University. Without her help, this study could not have been written. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 CHAPTER I. A SURVEY OF VICTORIAN SCHOLARSHIP ON MILTON ............. 11 II. THE REINTERPRETATION OF MILTON THE M A N ................ 65 III. THE VICTORIAN EVALUATION OF MILTON'S P O E T R Y ................ 113 IV. THE VICTORIAN EVALUATION OF MILTON'S P R O S E ................ 203 V. THE REINTERPRETATION OF MILTON THE PHILOSOPHER .... 232 CONCLUSION ......................................... 289 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................ 300 VITA ...................................... ........................ 313 iii IHTRCDUC TION John Mil-bon has always been a controversial figure. Writing in 1856, an anonymous essayist said, "Those of the great dramatist alone excepted, Milton's writings have been the object of more conjecture, praise, and detraction, of more worthless and elegant criticism, than _1 those of any other English poet. The purpose of this study is to /' / examine a part of the criticism which the anonymous writer has in mind, and we shall limit our inquiry to criticism that was p^dduced in Great Britain during the Victorian era. During his own lifetime, Milton was praised by men like Dryden and Marvell; conversely, he was despised by men like Roger L*Estrange and the author of The Censure of the Rota. The men who lived during the century following Milton's death could not reach a verdict on the man and his works. The illustrious Samuel Johnson wrote a scathing attack on the man, but he was immediately challenged by scores of critics, to such an extent that his Life of Milton had repercussions throughout the nineteenth century. During that hundred years Milton remained a figure of controversy. Like the neo-Jlugustans, the Roman tics and Victorians could agree, for the most part, on the merits of the blind bard's poetry as a form of art; they never agreed, however, on the validity of the ideas expressed in Milton's poetry and prose. ^"Keightley*s Life of Milton,” North American Review, LXXXII (1856), 388-404. Some critics, following Johnson's argument, were continually sug gesting that Milton had not been very pleasant as a human being. In our own century, Milton has had his defenders and his detractors.