DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Report of the 9Th Pan-European Green Belt Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Report of the 9Th Pan-European Green Belt Conference Summary Report of the 9th Pan-European Green Belt Conference 31st October – 3rd November 2016 Nature Centre Ukko, Koli National Park Finland Participants of the 9th Pan-European Conference © European Green Belt Association th The 9 Pan-European Green Belt Conference was jointly organized by The conference was financially supported by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, the Ministry of the Environment of Finland, the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation with funds of the German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear safety, the BUND Project Office Green Belt, the EuroNatur Foundation and the European Green Belt Association e.V. 2 Introduction The 9th Pan-European Green Belt Conference in Finland marks a new milestone for future cooperation of the European Green Belt Initiative. More than 125 participants from 26 countries, including representatives of all 24 countries along the European Green Belt, met in the Nature Centre Ukko in the Koli National Park from 31st October to 3rd November 2016. The aim of the conference was to give an insight and outlook on the cooperation and activities along the European Green Belt. The conference focused on experiences and best practices putting into action the vision of the European Green Belt on conserving the ecological network of high-value natural and cultural landscapes while respecting the economic, social and cultural needs of local communities. In addition, the conference contributed to the development of the European Green Belt as part of Green Infrastructure in Europe as well as to the strategic development of the European Green Belt Initiative. Furthermore, the Pan-European Conference provided an important platform for exchange between all partners along the European Green Belt. Information about the 9th Pan-European Green Belt Conference is available at: http://www.ym.fi/en- US/International_cooperation/Green_Belt_of_Fennoscandia/PanEuropean_Green_Belt_Conference Further information about the European Green Belt Initiative is available at: www.europeangreenbelt.org 3 Session Overview Tuesday, 01st November 2016 Session 1 - Opening of the 9th Pan-European Green Belt Conference Welcome Speeches: • Kimmo Tiilikainen, Minister of the Environment and Agriculture Finland (video) • Risto Poutanen, Regional Mayor, Regional Council of the North Karelia • Timo Tanninen, Executive Director, Parks and Wildlife Finland • Anna Balakireva, Director of the Unit, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Russia • Bjorn Arne Naess, Norwegian Environment Agency • Gabriel Schwaderer, Executive Director, EuroNatur, Chair of the European Green Belt Association Session 2 - Green Infrastructure and TEN-G Keynote Speeches: • EU Green Infrastructure: status and perspectives Stefan Leiner, Head of Biodiversity Unit, DG Environment, European Commission • German national ecological network: legal base, scientific foundation and European context. Dr. Uwe Riecken, Head of Department, Biotope Protection and Landscape Ecology, German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) Session 3 - Insights into the Green Belt of Fennoscandia Key Note Speeches: • History and special characteristics Rustam Sagitov, Director, Baltic Fund for Nature • Green Belt Strategy until 2020 Kristiina Niikkonen, Councellor, Ministry of the Environment of Finland Panel on the future and opportunities of the Green Belt in Fennoscandia Session 4 - Strategic Planning Session I Further development of the spatial dimension of the European Green Belt • Presentation of the project "European Green Belt as part of Green Infrastructure" Dr. Liana Geidezis (BUND Project Office Green Belt), Sandra Wigger (EuroNatur) • Introduction to the working session Felix Cybulla, Freelance Consultant Parallel working groups Session 5 - Best Practices – Guided Poster Session European Green Belt Fair 4 Wednesday, 02nd November 2016 Session 6 - Presentations of Best Practices • Cooperation between governmental and non-governmental organization in the frame of the European Green Belt Initiative, Melanie Kreutz (BUND Project Office Green Belt), Sandra Wigger (EuroNatur) • Best practices from Transboundary Park in Pasvik-Inari area and trilateral cooperation (nature tourism perspective) Tiia Kalske (Finnmark County), Riina Tervo (Parks & Wildlife Finland), Marina Trusova (Pasvik Zapovednik) • Tourism, health, well-being and nature Matti Tapaninen (Parks & Wildlife Finland) • SuoMaa: Safeguarding a large-scale taiga corridor between Finland and Russian Karelia Virpi Sahi (Finnish Nature Conservation Association) • BPAN – Barents Protected Area Network Anna Kuhmonen (Finnish Environment Institute) Session 7 - Strategic Planning Session II a Development of a work programme 2017-2018 for the European Green Belt Association • Function and role of the European Green Belt Association Gabriel Schwaderer, Executive Director, EuroNatur, Chair of the European Green Belt Association • Results of the 8th Pan-European Conference in Slavonice 2014 Felix Cybulla (Freelance Consultant), Melanie Kreutz (BUND Project Office Green Belt) Session 8 - Strategic Planning Session II b Development of a work programme 2017-2018 for the European Green Belt Association Parallel working group session Session 9 - Wrap-up and Closing • Kristiina Niikkonen, Councellor, Ministry of the Environment Finland • Gabriel Schwaderer, Executive Director, EuroNatur, Chair of the European Green Belt Association 5 Opening of the 9th Pan-European Green Belt Conference The conference was opened by the Ministry of the Environment of Finland as host of the 9th Pan- European Green Belt Conference. In addition, representatives of all three countries along the Green Belt of Fennoscandia – Finland, Norway and Russia –as well as the chair of the European Green Belt Association welcomed over 125 participants of the conference. Green Infrastructure and TEN-G The European Commission defines Green Infrastructure (GI) as a “strategically planned network of natural and semi-natural areas with other environmental features designed and managed to deliver a wide range of ecosystem services”. It incorporates green spaces (or blue if aquatic ecosystems are concerned) and other physical features in terrestrial (including coastal) and marine areas. The backbone of this network is formed by the Natura 2000 areas spread throughout Europe. At the same time GI will help improving the connectivity between sites in the Natura 2000 network as required by the Habitats Directive. Stefan Leiner, Head of the Biodiversity Unit of DG Environment (ENV) of the European Commission, highlighted in his presentation the European Green Belt as an important key example of Green Infrastructure on EU-level. According to the assessment of DG ENV a robust funding scheme for Green Infrastructure would be necessary. With regard to the already existing Trans-European Networks for Transport etc. a similar scheme should be established for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G). TEN-G would be an efficient instrument to provide a platform for developing a trans-European strategy and to provide appropriate funding. In order to convince other stakeholders on the relevance of Green Infrastructure studies on the socio-economic benefits provided by the European Green Belt are appreciated. Dr. Uwe Riecken, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Germany, gave an insight on the German ecological network as example for Green Infrastructure on national level. The background paper and presentations are available at: http://www.ym.fi/en- US/International_cooperation/Green_Belt_of_Fennoscandia/PanEuropean_Green_Belt_Conference 6 Insights into the Green Belt of Fennoscandia The history, special characteristics, the development as well as the strategy of the Green Belt of Fennoscandia were presented through two main key note speeches by representatives of the Russian NGO Baltic Fund for Nature as well as the Ministry of the Environment of Finland. The audience was given an enhanced understanding of the features of the Green Belt of Fennoscandia through a fruitful panel discussion with eight representatives from all three countries along the Green Belt of Fennoscandia. More information and the presentations are available at: http://www.ym.fi/en- US/International_cooperation/Green_Belt_of_Fennoscandia/PanEuropean_Green_Belt_Conference Koli National Park, Finland © Sandra Wigger 7 Further development of the spatial dimension of the European Green Belt In the frame of the project "European Green Belt as part of Green Infrastructure", supported by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation with funds of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety, different GIS analyses were elaborated regarding the spatial dimension of the European Green Belt. When it comes to topics such as Green Infrastructure (GI) and connectivity a clear definition of the spatial dimension of the European Green Belt is needed. Detailed analyses of any kind can only be run based on a defined spatial action space. Also the practical implementation of connectivity in spatial planning needs an assigned localization. Another important factor is that a defined spatial scope will contribute to ensuring the support on the ground. Only when stakeholders can be clearly named, they are able to identify themselves with the European Green Belt and actively campaign for it. However, such spatial delimitation is merely a geographical localization of the European Green Belt, meaning a planning or reference
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The European Green Belt Factor Dare to Connect
    10th Pan-European Green Belt Conference 15th-19th October 2018 in Eisenach/Wartburg, Germany Session 4 – Instruments to secure and improve the functionality of the European Green Belt The European Green Belt Factor Dare to Connect Melanie Kreutz BUND Department Green Belt Regional Coordinator Green Belt Central Europe Content Results of the Research- and Development- (R+D-) Project “The European Green Belt as part of Green Infrastructure”: Updated database on protected areas and gap analysis Central European Green Belt Results of 1-km-Buffer-Analysis of the Inner-German Green Belt Examples for the capitalization of results R+D-Project “The European Green Belt as part of GI” Updated data collection Protected areas in 150 km corridor R+D-Project “The European Green Belt as part of GI” Protected Areas in the European Green Belt IUCN I to VI, Natura 2000, Emerald, national parks, biosphere reserves: At least protected percentage in an 1 km-corridor: 47 % protected parts along EGB At least protected percentage in a 50 km-corridor: 27 % protected parts along EGB Connectivity Analysis (case studies Central Europe and Balkan): With decreasing distance to the border (former Iron Curtain) the percentage of protected areas is increasing and the average distance between protected areas is declining 1-km-Buffer-Analysis Green Belt Germany Aim: providing a more detailed picture of the relationship between the proportion of protected areas and the distance to the former Iron Curtain along the Green Belt Germany What is the spatial extent in which such an effect can be observed (in east and west direction)? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Belt Goes Baltic: Closing the Gap Between Central Europe and Fennoscandia
    Green Belt goes Baltic: Closing the Gap between Central Europe and Fennoscandia Young people in the southern and eastern Baltic Sea countries today can hardly understand why only two decades ago people were allowed to visit only designated beaches, why gigantic spot lights lit the beaches at night, why the Latvian shoreline was literally combed every day or why peninsulas were turned into mine fi elds in Germany. Since those times, these coasts have experienced a tremendous boom in building and development – largely not following the rules of sustainable development. An increasing demand for space for uses such as tourism, harbour and marina development, sand extraction, and power constructions confl icts seriously with nature conservation eff orts. At the same time, European Directives such as NATURA 2000, the Water Framework Directive, the recommendations for and evaluation of integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) and the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive have already or will trigger a number of national legal acts which can support future conservation of the Baltic Sea coast. However, these top-down activities need to be accompanied by bottom-up initiatives for full implementation in society. Th is is where the Baltic Green Belt sets in. Wustrow peninsula at the German Baltic Sea Coast - For years the map showing the European Green Belt’s path from the Barents Sea to the Adriatic and an example of former military areas at the coast still Black Seas has been blemished by a dashed line running along the south-eastern Baltic Sea from closed to the public today (Photo: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing the Former Iron Curtain, Which Divided Europe Into East and West
    European Green Belt Borders Separate - Nature Unites Tracing the former Iron Curtain, which divided Europe into East and West for almost forty years, a Green Belt now winds its way from the Barents Sea to the Adriatic Sea, and on from there to the Black Sea. It serves as a connection between valuable landscapes, habitats, and people. Over 12,500 km, a unique habitat network, a living landscape of memory developed and is still growing today. Borders Separate - Brown bear (Ursus arctos) Nature Unites Arnica (Arnica montana) Treasure Trove of Biodiversity Birds singing, the sound of the waves, the cry of an eagle, and the smell of wilderness places. Large mammals like brown bear, moose and grey seal, small insects such as wild bees and dragonflies, and rare plants such as arnica, all live here in harmony in the blooming meadows, the murmuring streams, the rich forests and the roaring sea. A splendid fan of rare habitats unfolds into an incomparable natural heritage. Where the Iron Curtain once separa- ted people, nature found rest and built her home, then as is now. Wild bee (Anthophora plumipes) Former border tower at the inner-German Green Belt A Landscape of Memory Against Oblivion The Green Belt Europe is an extraordinary symbol of modern European history. This living monument describes the peaceful end of the Cold War and the fall of the Iron Curtain. It transforms the tragic history of the 20th century into a symbol of European cooperation against man-made borders and for the natural world. Threats Buried under the natural beauty of Fennoscandia lie valu- able raw materials such as iron, gold, copper, bauxite and oil, each awakening desires of industrial exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • European Green Belt from Iron Curtain to Pan-European Lifeline Dr
    Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) European Parliament, Brussels 19th December 2011 European Green Belt From Iron Curtain to pan-European Lifeline Dr. Kai Frobel, Dr. Liana Geidezis BUND, Friends of the Earth Germany Regional Coordinator Green Belt Central Europe Green Belt Europe – beginning of the Initiative 1989: BUND initiates the Green Belt Germany Early 1990ies: Activities for a Fennoscandian Green Belt and Balkan Green Belt © BUND 2002: First idea of a “Green Belt Europe” 2003: Conference “Perspectives of the Green Belt” in Bonn (Germany) organised by BfN 2004: First Pan-European Green Belt Conference “Connecting Europe’s Biodiversity” in national park Fertö-Hansag (Hungary) organised by IUCN and BfN © BfN ► Common structure of the initiative ► Programme of Work (PoW) © BfN Green Belt Europe – Structure of the Initiative 12.500 Kilometers, 24 Countries Fennoscandian Green Belt National Focal Points Patronage: Central European Green Belt National Focal Points National Focal Points Balkan Green Belt Vision of the European Green Belt “Creating the backbone of an ecological network running from the Barents to the Black Sea that is a global symbol for trans-boundary cooperation in nature conservation and sustainable development” Stara Planina Bulgarian-Serbian border area 1 a/b Øvre- Pasvik (NOR) / Zapovednik Pasvik (RUS) 2 Urho-Kekkonen (FIN) 1 3 Riisitunturi (FIN) 2 39 National Parks /Zapovedniks 4 a/b Oulanka (FIN) / Paanajärvi (RUS) 3 4 5 Kalewala (RUS) along the European Green Belt 5 6 6 Hiidenportti
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Participants Greenbelt
    GREENBELT CAMP 11-26 September 2021 Call for participants About the Greenbelt Workcamp The European Green Belt is a valuable ecological network along the former Iron curtain which divided Europe into east and west for nearly 40 years. The European Green Belt forms the backbone of Pan-European ecological network and provides a significant contribution to European “Green Infrastructure”. The Greenbelt-Initiative is an example of cross border cooperation and nature conservation. European Green Belt is a space for encounters between people and cultures and opportunities for a joint sustainable approach to natural and cultural heritage. With this project in the Green Belt at the Austrian-Czech border, the Austrian League for Nature Conservation - Lower Austria and SCI Austria want to link international cooperation and nature conservation. Through the involvement of the communities in the border area and the close cooperation between the local people and international volunteers in the context of the Greenbelt Camp, we hope to bring peace, cooperation and unification ideas of t he European Green Belt to life. In order to preserve the diverse natural and cultural landscape along the European Green Belt, nature conservation-oriented management - in particular of open land biotope types such as (semi) dry grassland and rock dry grassland - is essential. This usually takes the form of manual maintenance of the valuable and species-rich biotopes and can hardly be managed today without the help of volunteers. Young people are invited to work together to help maintain valuable biotopes on the Green Belt and are given the opportunity to learn about the history of this landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2013, 4-10 October; Salamanca, Spain
    Green Belt Europe: Borders Separate, Nature Unites Uwe Friedel Abstract—During the period of the Cold War between 1945 and In the 20th century, European landscape was changed 1989, a “Green Belt” of valuable pristine landscapes developed dramatically by human impact. The growth of the European along the border line between Eastern and Western Europe, the population, the industrial agriculture and fast construction intensively fortified and guarded so called Iron Curtain. Due to the of traffic infrastructure led to the destruction and fragmenta- remoteness of the border areas, a high number of national parks tion of natural and semi-natural habitats. Wilderness was and other large conservation areas can be found there. They are pushed to the margins and remote areas of the continent. connected by small conservation areas and linear structures along But between the end of World War II and the collapse of the the borders which are to a high percentage natural, semi-natural Eastern bloc in 1989, a North-South-corridor throughout and/or extensively used areas. The Green Belt is a cross section of Europe escaped this impact: the border zone along the so all European biogeographical regions and a model for European called Iron Curtain between the politically separated eastern Green Infrastructure (European Commission 2013) which should be and western part of Europe. Along the Iron Curtain a “Green further developed as such. Moreover the Green Belt is an outstanding Belt” of valuable pristine landscapes developed. Due to the memorial landscape of European relevancy with a great potential remoteness of the border areas, a high number of national for trans-boundary cooperation, sustainable regional development, parks and other large conservation areas can be found there.
    [Show full text]
  • Traces of the Past Along the German Green Belt
    The Green Belt in its entire length is not a well developed and signposted hike and bicycle path. It is not always easy to tell where the former border strip was, as most of the border fortifications have been dismantled. Moreover, in some places the Green Belt is not recognisable because parts of it are now used as intensive grassland, arable land Traces of the Past or woodland. along the German Green Belt “Those who cannot remember their past are condemned to repeat it.” (George Santayana) The Green Belt in its entire length is not a well developed and signposted hike and bicycle path. It is not always easy to tell where the former border strip was, as most of the border fortifications have been dismantled. Moreover, in some places the Green Belt is not recognisable because parts of it are now used as intensive grassland, arable land or woodland. East German border guard on patrol Opening of the border at Mödlareuth “Western tourists” at the Iron Curtain 2 INHALT FOREWORD Dear visitors of the Green Belt and the borderland museums, For more than 25 years, the Green Belt, the stretch of unspoilt nature that has arisen as a result of the inhumane inner-German border, has been a constant reminder of our once divided nation. Nature has been left to its own devices here, not because we want to forget, but because we want to remember. Scores of people visit the Green Belt in an attempt to come to terms with history: the history of their country, their mothers and fathers, relatives, friends or even their own personal fate.
    [Show full text]
  • Eksplorojmë Bukuritë Natyrore Dhe Turistike Në Parkun Kombëtar Shebenik-Jabllanicë
    EKSPLOROJMË BUKURITË NATYRORE DHE TURISTIKE NË PARKUN KOMBËTAR SHEBENIK-JABLLANICË EXPLORING THE TOURISTIC AND LIVELIHOOD ATTRACTIONS OF SHEBENIK-JABLLANICE NATIONAL PARK Hyrje Ky foto album, është realizuar, nga një grup të rinjsh të Njësive Administrative Stebleve, Qendër dhe Hotolisht, të Bashkisë Librazhd, përfitues të projektit “Promovimi i përfshirjes sociale të të rinjve nëpërmjet aktiviteteve ndërgjegjësuese dhe vullnetare në mbështetje të komunitetit”, I financuar nga Qeveria Gjermane, përmes programit të GIZ-së, “Zhvillimi i qëndrueshëm ekonomik dhe rajonal, nxitja e punësimit, arsimi dhe trajnimi professional” – ProSEED dhe zbatuar nga Shoqata Rinore Soek-In, Librazhd Me qëllimin për të eksploruar atraksionet turistike por dhe për të promovuar vlerat natyrore, kulinarike dhe traditat kulturore të zonave ku banojnë, shpresojmë që ky foto album, t’u shërbeje gjithashtu dhe dashamirësve dhe eksploruesve të zonave të mrekullueshme të Shqiperisë, vizitorëve dhe miqve të Parkut Kombetar Shebenik-Jabllanice Introduction This photo album, is prepared from a young group from Stebleva, Qender and Hotolisht Administrative Units of Librazhd Municipality, beneficiaries of the project” Promoting the social inclusion of the young people through volunteering and sensibilisation activities, in support of the community”,Financed by the German Government, through GIZ programme „Sustainable Economic and Regional Development, Employment Promotion and Vocational Education and Training” – ProSEED and implemented by Soek-In Youth Organsation, Librazhd. With the scope to explore the touristic and livelihood attractions and beauties of their areas, but also being promoters of the natural, cultural, culinary, traditions values of their living place we hope that this album will serve all interested, well-wished explorers of the wonderful sites of Albania, visitors and friend of the Shebenik-Jabllanice National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Biodiversity in the Balkans - Strengthening Cooperation Along the Balkan Green Belt AZ 30854/01-4 Project Duration: December 2014 – November 2018
    Protecting Biodiversity in the Balkans - Strengthening cooperation along the Balkan Green Belt AZ 30854/01-4 Project Duration: December 2014 – November 2018 Final report prepared by EuroNatur Foundation March 2019 06/02 Projektkennblatt der Deutschen Bundesstiftung Umwelt Az 30854/01-4 Referat Fördersumme 124.772 € Antragstitel Grenzüberschreitende Umweltkommunikation zum Erhalt der Biodiversität entlang des Balkan Green Belt Stichworte Balkan Green Belt Laufzeit Projektbeginn Projektende Projektphase(n) 24 months 07.12.14 30.11.18 Zwischenberichte 3 Bewilligungsempfänger IUCN Tel + 49 7732 9272 0 International Union for Conservation of Nature Fax + 49 7732 92 72 22 28 rue Mauverney Project manager CH – 1196 Gland Sandra Wigger, EuroNatur EuroNatur Stiftung Project coordinator 78315 Radolfzell Annette Spangenberg, Germany EuroNatur Kooperationspartner Objectives The project aims at the conservation of a transboundary ecological network along the border of Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Kosovo, FYR Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey and Romania through en- hancement of cooperation along the Balkan Green Belt. In addition, the project aims at strengthening the cross-border exchange and collaboration between CSOs working along the Balkan Green Belt. Objectives of the project are as following: • To raise the profile of the Balkan Green Belt and the awareness of the importance of biodiversity conservation and ecological networks in the region and beyond. • To improve transboundary cooperation along the Balkan Green Belt through increased regional sup- port to the initiative and its objectives by coordinating a regional process with particular involvement of partner organisations. • To improve the basis of decision-making and awareness-raising on biodiversity and protected areas along the Balkan Green Belt. The foreseen activities will contribute to improved protection of the biodiversity along the Balkan Green Belt and will foster stability among Balkan countries through cross-border cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No. 3, January 2013
    Newsletter no. 3, January 2013 Balkan Green Belt capacity building ........................................................................................... 2 Italian Cooperation Director visits the Buna River ...................................................................... 3 Filming launched: international documentary on IUCN project ................................................... 4 Project achievements – year one ............................................................................................... 4 Data collection: INTERVIEW with Mrs Giuliani and Mr De Sanctis, project experts .................... 6 Shaping the pilot sites’ management plans .............................................................................. 7 Albania adopts sea turtle conservation action plan ................................................................... 8 Challenges for protected areas in Albania .................................................................................. 9 Velipojë Protected Landscape in Video.……………………………………………………………...10 Balkan Green Belt capacity building In October 2012, the IUCN team contributed to a number of capacity building workshops for nature conservation organizations of Montenegro and Kosovo, held in Librazhd and Shebenik-Jabllanicë National Park, Albania. The workshops aimed at training young professionals in wildlife and vegetation survey methods, e.g. conduction of structured interviews, principles of camera-traps and foot snares use, but also at familiarizing them with the latest concepts
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Baseline Assessment
    Albanian Development Fund Biodiversity Baseline Assessment Zgosht to Cerenec road scheme; Albania National and Regional Roads Project 80876 JUNE 2020 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 80876-0 Title: Biodiversity Baseline Assessment Client: EBRD and ADF Date: 7 July 2020 Office: Helsby Status: REV00 Dr J Nightingale Iain Lednor Corin Simmonds Author Beth Carter Technical reviewer Nikki O’Donnell Signature Signature Date: 07-07-2020 Date: 07-07-2020 Project manager Dr J Nightingale Signature [delete row if not required] Date: 07-07-2020 ADF Biodiversity Baseline Assessment 80876-0 Reviewer Reviewer Head of Specialist of Nertis Mero Environmental Blerta Duro Environmental and Social Unit and Social Unit ADF ADF Signature Signature Date: 16.10.2020 Date: 16.10.2020 Director of Infrastructure Department ADF Arben Skënderi Signature Date: 16.10.2020 Director of Projects Project Manager Management Department ADF Dritan Mehdi Agolli Ermir Omari ADF Signature Signature Date: 16.10.2020 Date: 16.10.2020 RSK Environment Ltd (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client and RSK. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Incorporating Natural and Human Factors in Habitat Modelling and Spatial Prioritisation for the Lynx Lynx Martinoi
    Supplement of Web Ecol., 16, 17–31, 2016 http://www.web-ecol.net/16/17/2016/ doi:10.5194/we-16-17-2016-supplement © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Supplement of Incorporating natural and human factors in habitat modelling and spatial prioritisation for the Lynx lynx martinoi K. Laze and A. Gordon Correspondence to: K. Laze ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC-BY 3.0 licence. Supplementary material S0. Lynx data S0.1 Brief description of the country cooperation for the lynx conservation S0.2 Study area S0.3. Environmental and human data S1. Criterion for selection of pseudo-absences S2. List of predictor variables used for the lynx models S3. Neighbourhood variables S4. Results of the tests of spatial autocorrelation, Kruskall-Wallis test, Pearson test S5. Spatial autocorrelation of dependent variable S6. Models S7. Summary of best logistic regression model and model selection estimators S8. Summary of best models, the variables sign, statistically significance coefficients and their standard errors S9. Summary of best three RSPF regression models, the best GLM model with randomly removed permanent (and permanent + temporal) occurrences and model selection estimators S10. Response of lynx to neighbourhood habitat loss S11. The estimated probability of occurrence of the lynx with combined permanent + temporal occurrences S12. Priority locations for extending current protected areas for the lynx conservation with combined permanent + temporal occurrences S13. Stable forests in the cross-border areas 1 S0. Lynx data Lynx data were collected before 1990 in Europe but not in all countries in the southern-eastern Europe (e.g., in socialist Albania).
    [Show full text]