A Universal Protein–Protein Interaction Motif in the Eubacterial DNA Replication and Repair Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Universal Protein–Protein Interaction Motif in the Eubacterial DNA Replication and Repair Systems A universal protein–protein interaction motif in the eubacterial DNA replication and repair systems Brian P. Dalrymple*†, Kritaya Kongsuwan*†, Gene Wijffels*†, Nicholas E. Dixon‡, and Philip A. Jennings†§ †Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Livestock Industries, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly QLD 4068, Australia; and ‡Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Communicated by W. James Peacock, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia, July 24, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) The interaction between DNA polymerases and sliding clamp then examined by yeast two-hybrid and peptide-binding exper- proteins confers processivity in DNA synthesis. This interaction is iments with native and modified sequences. critical for most DNA replication machines from viruses and pro- karyotes to higher eukaryotes. The clamp proteins also participate Materials and Methods in a variety of dynamic and competing protein–protein interac- Sources of Amino Acid Sequences. Amino acid sequences and tions. However, clamp-protein binding sequences have not so far alignments were derived from: PSI-BLAST of the protein database been identified in the eubacteria. Here we show from three lines at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), of evidence, bioinformatics, yeast two-hybrid analysis, and inhi- and BLAST of preliminary sequence data from NCBI at http:͞͞ bition of protein–protein interaction by modified peptides, that www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov͞Microb_blast͞unfinishedgenome.html, variants of a pentapeptide motif (consensus QL[SD]LF) are suffi- Institute for Genomic Research at http:͞͞www.tigr.org, Depart- cient to enable interaction of a number of proteins with an ment of Energy Joint Genome Institute at http:͞͞spider.jgi- archetypal eubacterial sliding clamp (the ␤ subunit of Escherichia psf.org͞JGI_microbial͞html͞, Sanger Center at http:͞͞ coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme). Representatives of this motif www.sanger.ac.uk͞DataSearch͞omniblast.shtml, and ERGO at are present in most sequenced members of the eubacterial DnaE, http:͞͞wit.integratedgenomics.com͞IGwit͞. Alignments of PolC, PolB, DinB, and UmuC families of DNA polymerases and the available sequences of all members of eubacterial protein fam- MutS1 mismatch repair protein family. The component tripeptide ilies known to bind to ␤ were compiled with manual editing in MICROBIOLOGY DLF inhibits the binding of the ␣ (DnaE) subunit of E. coli DNA regions of variable length and sequence. After the identification polymerase III to ␤ at ␮M concentration, identifying key residues. of the proposed ␤-binding motif, alignments of the sequences of Comparison of the eubacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal sliding members of eubacterial families homologous to eukaryotic clamp binding motifs suggests that the basic interactions have proteins known to bind to proliferating cell nuclear antigen been conserved across the evolutionary landscape. (PCNA) were compiled from GenBank as described above. Regions containing the proposed ␤-binding peptide motifs were ␤ he replication of DNA in eubacteria involves many proteins aligned to maximize matches of a putative -binding site to the Torganized into a complex multifunctional machine termed evolving consensus sequence. the replisome. A central enzyme is the multisubunit DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. In Escherichia coli, and probably in Strains. E. coli XL-1Blue was the host for all plasmid construc- most other eubacteria, the DnaE ortholog (␣ subunit) is in the tions and source of chromosomal DNA. The pLexA, pB42AD, core of the replicative polymerase, whereas in many Gram- p8op-lacZ vectors, and yeast EGY48 cells were from the Match- positive organisms a related enzyme, PolC, is proposed to have maker two-hybrid system (CLONTECH). this function (1). The processivity of the polymerase is conferred Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays. E. coli ␤ dnaN by the direct interaction of the ␤ subunit (clamp protein) of DNA The coding region of ( ) was amplified by PCR (Pfu polymerase) from chromosomal polymerase III (2, 3), with the DnaE (and presumably PolC) DNA and inserted at the EcoRI site of pB42AD to create a subunits. ␤ is loaded onto DNA by a clamp loader comprised of translational fusion. To construct various deletions of the E. coli single ␦ and ␦Ј subunits and four ␶͞␥ subunits (1). The ␤ dimer dnaE, the appropriate portion of dnaE was amplified by PCR thence encircles the DNA without actually binding to it. In and inserted between the EcoRI and XhoI sites of pLexA for an addition to DnaE, three other E. coli DNA polymerases appear in-frame fusion. For site- directed mutagenesis, the dnaE frag- to interact with ␤. PolB (DNA polymerase II) is involved in DNA ment was cloned into pQE11 (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), and repair (4) and the addition of ␤ and the clamp loader increases mutations were introduced by using the QuikChange system its processivity in vitro (5, 6). Similarly, ␤ and the clamp loader (Stratagene). The PCR-generated fragments containing the together increase both the processivity (7) and efficiency (8) of mutation then were subcloned into pLexA. To express peptides DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase IV (DinB). ␤ also appears containing the putative ␤-binding regions, appropriate regions to play a similar role in the activity of DNA polymerase V (8) of E. coli dnaE, polB, umuC, umuD, dinB, and mutS genes were (the UmuDЈ UmuC complex) and the UmuD subunit has been 2 amplified by PCR and fused in-frame to the LexA binding shown to bind to ␤ (9). domain through a Gly-Ala-Gly or Ala-Gly-Ala linker. Interac- Experimental evidence shows that at least some ␤-binding ␤ ␤ tions between and various LexA fusion proteins were tested in proteins can interact productively with from heterologous yeast EGY48 containing a lacZ reporter gene (EGY48p80p- species. For example, PolC subunits from Staphylococcus aureus, lacZ). Cotransformants were plated in synthetic complete me- Streptococcus pyogenes, and Bacillus subtilis can use E. coli ␤ as their processivity subunit (1, 10, 11). In contrast, E. coli DnaE ␤ cannot use from the other species (11), the E. coli clamp loader Abbreviations: PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; RT, room temperature. ␤ complex cannot load S. aureus (11), and the S. pyogenes clamp *B.P.D., K.K., and G.W. contributed equally to this work. ␤ loader complex cannot load E. coli (1). § ␤ To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. In the absence of any experimentally identified -binding sites The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This in proteins, a bioinformatics approach was undertaken to iden- article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. tify putative ␤-binding motifs. The role of the putative motif was §1734 solely to indicate this fact. www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.191384398 PNAS ͉ September 25, 2001 ͉ vol. 98 ͉ no. 20 ͉ 11627–11632 dium lacking appropriate supplements to maintain plasmid eubacterial PolB family is most similar to the archaeal PolB selection and patched onto indicator medium (SG͞Gal͞Raf͞- family, members of which use PCNA (15) [the eukaryotic͞ His͞-Leu͞-Trp͞-Ura with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl ␤-D- archaeal equivalent of ␤ (16)]. The archaeal proteins contain a galactoside), grown at 30°C, and checked after 36 h for devel- peptide matching the consensus PCNA-binding motif (17) Qxx- opment of blue color. Results were compared with positive LxxFF (where x is any amino acid) at their carboxyl termini (15). (pLexA-53 with pB42AD-T) and negative (pLexA-Lam with We identified a pentapeptide with the consensus QLsLF (where pB42AD-T) controls grown in parallel. Cells also were grown to s is a small amino acid) at, or close to, the carboxyl termini of the midlog phase in selective media containing glucose or galactose. known eubacterial PolB proteins (Fig. 1). The similarity of this ␤-Galactosidase activity is expressed in Miller units. All results sequence to the PCNA-binding motif suggested that it may play are the mean of at least two independent assays with four a role in interaction with ␤. A similar conserved peptide replicates per assay. sequence at the carboxyl termini of members of the eubacterial PolC family also was identified (Fig. 1). The PolC and DnaE Binding Inhibition Assays. DNA polymerase III subunits ␣ and ␤ families contain homologous core domains, but have different were purified by modifications of published procedures using structural organizations and contain some unique domains (18). strains containing wild-type dnaEϩ and dnaNϩ derivatives of the However, a similar conserved peptide sequence was again ␭-promoter vector pCE30 (12). The ␦ subunit was prepared by identified in members of the DnaE family at the equivalent using strain BL21(DE3)͞pLysS͞pET␦, essentially as described location to that in PolC, rather than at the carboxyl termini (Fig. (13). The ␣ subunit at 20 ␮g͞ml was coated onto 96-well 1). The location of the peptide in E. coli ␣ is consistent with microtiter plates (Falcon flexible plates, Becton Dickinson) in previous work, which mapped a much larger region of ␤ binding ␮ ͞ 100 mM Na2CO3, pH 9.5 [50 l well, overnight at 4°C, or 4 h (19). Variants of the peptide sequence also were identified in at 25°C (room temperature, RT)]. Plates were washed in most eubacterial members of the UmuC and DinB1 families WB3 [20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA, containing 0.05% (Fig. 1). However, the level of conservation of the proposed (vol͞vol) Tween 20]. This buffer was used in wash steps through- ␤-binding motifs in the DnaE and DinB1 families was signifi- out. Plates were then blocked with Blotto (5% skim milk powder cantly lower than in the PolB and PolC families. in WB3 100 ␮l͞well, RT) until required, then washed immedi- A large number of proteins that bind to PCNA and related ately before use. proteins has been identified (Table 2, which is published as The peptides were synthesized by fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl supporting information on the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org).
Recommended publications
  • Mutations That Separate the Functions of the Proofreading Subunit of the Escherichia Coli Replicase
    G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics Early Online, published on April 15, 2015 as doi:10.1534/g3.115.017285 Mutations that separate the functions of the proofreading subunit of the Escherichia coli replicase Zakiya Whatley*,1 and Kenneth N Kreuzer*§ *University Program in Genetics & Genomics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705 §Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 1 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by the Genetics Society of America. Running title: E. coli dnaQ separation of function mutants Keywords: DNA polymerase, epsilon subunit, linker‐scanning mutagenesis, mutation rate, SOS response Corresponding author: Kenneth N Kreuzer, Department of Biochemistry, Box 3711, Nanaline Duke Building, Research Drive, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 Phone: 919 684 6466 FAX: 919 684 6525 Email: [email protected] 1 Present address: Department of Biology, 300 N Washington Street, McCreary Hall, Campus Box 392, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA 17325 Phone: 717 337 6160 Fax: 7171 337 6157 Email: [email protected] 2 ABSTRACT The dnaQ gene of Escherichia coli encodes the ε subunit of DNA polymerase III, which provides the 3’ 5’ exonuclease proofreading activity of the replicative polymerase. Prior studies have shown that loss of ε leads to high mutation frequency, partially constitutive SOS, and poor growth. In addition, a previous study from our lab identified dnaQ knockout mutants in a screen for mutants specifically defective in the SOS response following quinolone (nalidixic acid) treatment. To explain these results, we propose a model whereby in addition to proofreading, ε plays a distinct role in replisome disassembly and/or processing of stalled replication forks.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA POLYMERASE III HOLOENZYME: Structure and Function of a Chromosomal Replicating Machine
    Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1995.64:171-200 Copyright Ii) 1995 byAnnual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved DNA POLYMERASE III HOLOENZYME: Structure and Function of a Chromosomal Replicating Machine Zvi Kelman and Mike O'Donnell} Microbiology Department and Hearst Research Foundation. Cornell University Medical College. 1300York Avenue. New York. NY }0021 KEY WORDS: DNA replication. multis ubuni t complexes. protein-DNA interaction. DNA-de penden t ATPase . DNA sliding clamps CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................ 172 THE HOLO EN ZYM E PARTICL E. .......................................... 173 THE CORE POLYMERASE ............................................... 175 THE � DNA SLIDING CLAM P............... ... ......... .................. 176 THE yC OMPLEX MATCHMAKER......................................... 179 Role of ATP . .... .............. ...... ......... ..... ............ ... 179 Interaction of y Complex with SSB Protein .................. ............... 181 Meclwnism of the yComplex Clamp Loader ................................ 181 Access provided by Rockefeller University on 08/07/15. For personal use only. THE 't SUBUNIT . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 182 Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1995.64:171-200. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org AS YMMETRIC STRUC TURE OF HOLO EN ZYM E . 182 DNA PO LYM ER AS E III HOLO ENZ YME AS A REPLIC ATING MACHINE ....... 186 Exclwnge of � from yComplex to Core .................................... 186 Cycling of Holoenzyme on the LaggingStrand
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Disruption of a G4-DNA-Dependent Nuclease In
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 92, pp. 6002-6006, June 1995 Genetics Gene disruption of a G4-DNA-dependent nuclease in yeast leads to cellular senescence and telomere shortening (guanine-quartet/KEMI/SEPI/checkpoint/meiosis) ZHIPING Liu, ARNOLD LEE, AND WALTER GILBERT Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Biological Laboratories, 16 Divinity Avenue, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138-2092 Contributed by Walter Gilbert, April 3, 1995 ABSTRACT The yeast gene KEMI (also named (11). A highly conserved feature is that one of the strands is SEPI/DST2/XRNI/RAR5) produces a G4-DNA-dependent very G-rich and always exists as a 3' overhang at the end of the nuclease that binds to G4 tetraplex DNA structure and cuts in chromosome. Telomeres carry out two essential functions. a single-stranded region 5' to the G4 structure. G4-DNA They protect, or stabilize, the ends of linear chromosomes, generated from yeast telomeric oligonucleotides competitively since artificially generated ends (by means of mechanical inhibits the cleavage reaction, suggesting that this enzyme sheering, x-ray irradiation, or enzymatic cleavage) are very may interact with yeast telomeres in vivo. Homozygous dele- unstable (12-14). Furthermore, they serve to circumvent the tions ofthe KEMI gene in yeast block meiosis at the pachytene incomplete DNA replication at the ends of linear chromo- stage, which is consistent with the hypothesis that G4 tetra- somes (15) by extending the G-rich strand through a de novo plex DNA may be involved in homologous chromosome pairing synthesis catalyzed by telomerase to counterbalance the se- during meiosis. We conjectured that the mitotic defects of quence loss at an end in lagging-strand replication (16, 17).
    [Show full text]
  • Distinct Co-Evolution Patterns of Genes Associated to DNA Polymerase III Dnae and Polc Stefan Engelen1,2, David Vallenet2, Claudine Médigue2 and Antoine Danchin1,3*
    Engelen et al. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:69 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/69 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Distinct co-evolution patterns of genes associated to DNA polymerase III DnaE and PolC Stefan Engelen1,2, David Vallenet2, Claudine Médigue2 and Antoine Danchin1,3* Abstract Background: Bacterial genomes displaying a strong bias between the leading and the lagging strand of DNA replication encode two DNA polymerases III, DnaE and PolC, rather than a single one. Replication is a highly unsymmetrical process, and the presence of two polymerases is therefore not unexpected. Using comparative genomics, we explored whether other processes have evolved in parallel with each polymerase. Results: Extending previous in silico heuristics for the analysis of gene co-evolution, we analyzed the function of genes clustering with dnaE and polC. Clusters were highly informative. DnaE co-evolves with the ribosome, the transcription machinery, the core of intermediary metabolism enzymes. It is also connected to the energy-saving enzyme necessary for RNA degradation, polynucleotide phosphorylase. Most of the proteins of this co-evolving set belong to the persistent set in bacterial proteomes, that is fairly ubiquitously distributed. In contrast, PolC co- evolves with RNA degradation enzymes that are present only in the A+T-rich Firmicutes clade, suggesting at least two origins for the degradosome. Conclusion: DNA replication involves two machineries, DnaE and PolC. DnaE co-evolves with the core functions of bacterial life. In contrast PolC co-evolves with a set of RNA degradation enzymes that does not derive from the degradosome identified in gamma-Proteobacteria. This suggests that at least two independent RNA degradation pathways existed in the progenote community at the end of the RNA genome world.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion of OX174 and Fd Single-Stranded DNA to Replicative Forms in Extracts of Escherichia Coli (Dnac, Dnad, and Dnag Gene Products/DNA Polymerase III) REED B
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 69, No. 11, pp. 3233-3237, November 1972 Conversion of OX174 and fd Single-Stranded DNA to Replicative Forms in Extracts of Escherichia coli (dnaC, dnaD, and dnaG gene products/DNA polymerase III) REED B. WICKNER, MICHEL WRIGHT, SUE WICKNER, AND JERARD HURWITZ Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer, Division of Biological Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461 Communicated by Harry Eagle, August 28, 1972 ABSTRACT 4X174 and M13 (fd) single-stranded cir- MATERIALS AND METHODS cular DNAs are converted to their replicative forms by ex- tracts of E. coli pol Al cells. We find that the qX174 DNA- [a-32P]dTTP was obtained from New England Nuclear Corp. dependent reaction requires Mg++, ATP, and all four de- OX174 DNA was prepared by the method of Sinsheimer (7) oxynucleoside triphosphates, but not CTP, UTP, or GTP. or Franke and Ray (8), while fd viral DNA was prepared as This reaction also involves the products of the dnaC, dnaD, dnaE (DNA polymerase III), and dnaG genes, described (9). Pancreatic RNase was the highest grade ob- but not that of dnaF (ribonucleotide reductase). The in tainable from Worthington Biochemical Corp. It was further vitro conversion of fd single-stranded DNA to the replica- freed of possible contaminating DNase by heating a solution tive form requires all four ribonucleoside triphosphates, (2 mg/ml in 15 mM sodium citrate, pH 5) at 800 for 10 min. Mg++, and all four deoxynucleoside triphosphates. The E. protein was purified from E. coli strain reaction involves the product of gene dnaE but not those coli unwinding of genes dnaC, dnaD, dnaF, or dnaG.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of DNA Polymerases II and III in Mutants of Escherichia Coli Thermosensitive for DNA Synthesis (Polal Mutants/Phosphocellulose Chromatography/Dnae Locus)
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 68, No. 12, pp. 3150-3153, December 1971 Analysis of DNA Polymerases II and III in Mutants of Escherichia coli Thermosensitive for DNA Synthesis (polAl mutants/phosphocellulose chromatography/dnaE locus) MALCOLM L. GEFTER, YUKINORI HIROTA*, THOMAS KORNBERG, JAMES A. WECHSLER, AND C. BARNOUX* Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, N.Y. 10027; and * Service de G6n6tique Cellulaire de l'Institut Pasteur, Paris Communicated by Cyrus Levinthal, October 18, 1971 ABSTRACT A series of double mutants carrying one of (5) PC79: F- his- strr malA xyl- mtlh thi- polAl sup- the thermosensitive mutations for DNA synthesis (dnaA, dnaD7 B, C, D, E, F, and G) and the polAl mutation of DeLucia and Cairns, were constructed. Enzyme activities of DNA (6) E5111: F- his- strr malA xylh mtlh arg- thi- sup- Polymerases II and III were measured in each mutant. polAl dnaE511 DNA Polymerase II activity was normal in all strains (7) E4860: F- his- str' malA xylh mtlh arg- thi- sup- tested. DNA Polymerase III activity is thermosensitive dnaE486 specifically in those strains having thermosensitive muta- tions at the dnaE locus. From these results we conclude (8) E4868: F- his- strr malA xyl- mtlh arg thi- sup- that DNA Polymerases II and III are independent en- polAl dnaE486 zymes and that DNA Polymerase III is an enzyme required (9) BT1026: H560thy-endoI- polAl dnaE for DNA replication in Escherichia coli. (10) BT1040: H560 thy endoI polAl dnaE (11) E1011: F- his- strr malA xyl- mtl- arg- thi- sup- The isolation by DeLucia and Cairns (1) of an Escherichia polAl dnaFI01 coli mutant that lacks DNA Polymerase I activity (polA1) (12) JW207: thy-rha-strrpolAl dnaF101 has prompted many investigations into the nature of the (13) NY73: leu- thy- metE rifr strr polAl dnaG3 DNA synthetic capacity of such strains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Escherichia Coli Polb Gene, Which Encodes DNA Polymerase II, Is Regulated by the SOS System HIROSHI IWASAKI,' ATSUO NAKATA,1 GRAHAM C
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Nov. 1990, p. 6268-6273 Vol. 172, No. 11 0021-9193/90/116268-06$02.00/0 Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology The Escherichia coli polB Gene, Which Encodes DNA Polymerase II, Is Regulated by the SOS System HIROSHI IWASAKI,' ATSUO NAKATA,1 GRAHAM C. WALKER,2 AND HIDEO SHINAGAWA1* Department ofExperimental Chemotherapy, Research Institute for Microbial Disease, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan,1 and Biology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 021392 Received 7 June 1990/Accepted 13 August 1990 The dinA (damage inducible) gene was previously identified as one of the SOS genes with no known function; it was mapped near the leuB gene, where the poiB gene encoding DNA polymerase H was also mapped. We cloned the chromosomal fragment carrying the dinA region from the ordered Escherichia coli genomic library and mapped the dinA promoter precisely on the physical map of the chromosome. The cells that harbored multicopy plasmids with the dimA region expressed very high levels of DNA polymerase activity, which was sensitive to N-ethylmaleimide, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase II. Expression of the polymerase activity encoded by the dinA locus was regulated by SOS system, and the dinA promoter was the promoter of the gene encoding the DNA polymerase. From these data we conclude that the polB gene is identical to the dinA gene and is regulated by the SOS system. The product of the polB (dinA) gene was identified as an 80-kDa protein by the maxicell method. In Escherichia coli, three DNA polymerases have been pSY343 (27), pSCH18 (10), and pRS528 (22) were used for identified (15).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanisms of DNA Double Strand Break Repair and Mismatch Recognition a Dissertation
    The Mechanisms of DNA Double Strand Break Repair and Mismatch Recognition A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Graduate Program in Molecular and Cell Biology James E. Haber, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Danielle Nicole Gallagher February 2021 The signed version of this form is on file in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. This dissertation, directed and approved by Danielle Gallagher’s Committee, has been accepted and approved by the Faculty of Brandeis University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Eric Chasalow, Dean Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Dissertation Committee: James E. Haber, Biology Dept. Lizbeth Hedstrom, Biology and Chemistry Dept. Susan T. Lovett, Biology Dept. Sue Jinks-Robertson, Cell and Molecular Biology Dept., Duke University ii Copyright by Danielle Nicole Gallagher 2021 iii Acknowledgements I cannot accurately express my gratitude to all of the wonderful mentors that I have had, not only throughout graduate school, but throughout my life. Among these, I would specifically like to thank Bill (Woody) Woodrum and Lori Woodrum, 4H leaders in my home community who have encouraged me since I was 11 years old to believe in myself and pursue higher education, even when it seemed like an impossibility. To my wonderful Haber lab, thank you for such a supportive and stimulating environment. To Neal and Miyuki, thank you for keeping the lab running smoothly. To Gonen Memisoglu, David Waterman, Brenda Lemos-Waterman, and Annette Beach, thank you for your patience and mentorship when I first joined the lab.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vivo Investigation of Interactions Between Replisome Components in Escherichia Coli: an Expanded Model for the Processivity Switch
    www.als-journal.com/ ISSN 2310-5380/ February 2020 Full Length Research Article Advancements in Life Sciences – International Quarterly Journal of Biological Sciences ARTICLE INFO Open Access Date Received: 25/08/2019; Date Revised: 16/02/2020; In vivo investigation of interactions between replisome Date Published Online: 25/02/2020; components in Escherichia coli: An expanded model for the Authors’ Affiliation: 1. School of Biology, Queens processivity switch Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham - UK 2. Institute of Microbiology, Atif A. Patoli*1,2, Bushra B. Patoli1,2 University of Sindh, Jamshoro - Pakistan Abstract *Corresponding Author: Atif A. Patoli ackground: Protein interactions within the replisome (a highly coordinated protein complex) are crucial Email: [email protected] to maintain temporal and spatial regulation for high fidelity DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli (E. coli). A key component of these interactions is the processivity switch, ensuring smooth transition of the How to Cite: B replicative DNA polymerase III (Pol III) between Okazaki fragments on the lagging strand. Multiple Patoli AA, Patoli BB (2020). In vivo investigation of interaction studies between replisome components have been performed to indicate the essential roles of Pol III interactions between replisome components in (DnaE), β-clamp, DnaB helicase, DNA and the (DnaX) subunit for this switch. Escherichia coli: An expanded model for the processivity switch. Adv. Life Methods: Known interacting regions of both DnaE and various truncated versions of were chosen for co- Sci. 7(2): 66-71. expression in E. coli. Differences in the growth pattern of cells co-expressing various truncated versions of DnaX and DnaE, on liquid and solid media were subsequently analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Premature Termination of Telomeric Extension- PCR for Detection Of
    MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES Premature termination of telomeric extension- third “G.” The products are identical oligonucleotide ssDNA with 3′ ends of PCR for detection of telomerase activity “AGGG.” (ii) Taq DNA polymerase has the ability to bind and extend the Ran Chen, Ji Qian, Lijuan Wang, and Yu-min Mao matched, but not the mismatched, nu- cleotides at the 3′ end of a primer an- Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R.China nealed to a complementary template strand. While the 3′ end of the primer BioTechniques 35:158-162 (July 2003) that matches the template is necessary for PCR, sporadic mismatches within In this article, we report a simple, rapid, and efficient method to detect telomerase activity: the primer do not hinder PCR (16–19). the premature termination of telomeric extension-PCR (PTEP). Similar to the telomeric re- Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram peat amplification protocol (TRAP), this method is based on PCR amplification following of PTEP. Except for two bases of its 3′ the in vitro telomerase reaction, while the in vitro telomerase reaction here is prematurely, end, the telomerase primer TS is ho- rather than randomly, terminated. Apart from this, the telomeric extension products are used mologous to the corresponding sites of as initial primers, instead of as templates, to trigger the amplification with a specially con- the specially constructed DNA (SP structed plasmid DNA as the template that cannot be directly amplified with the telomerase DNA; the template, a plasmid carrying primer. The end product is a specific 159-bp DNA fragment that reflects telomerase activity. one pair of reverse repeat sequences: 5′- Because its product can be clearly identified with routine agarose gel electrophoresis and AATCCGTCGAGCAGAGAAAGGG- ethidium bromide staining, PTEP allows even lesser-equipped laboratories to easily detect 3′.
    [Show full text]
  • Purification of Escherichia Coli Yoaa, a Putative Helicase Master's Thesis
    Purification of Escherichia coli YoaA, a Putative Helicase Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Biochemistry Dr. Susan Lovett, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Biochemistry by Mark Gregory May 2019 Copyright by Mark Gregory © 2019 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Susan Lovett. Thank you for sharing with me the incredible opportunity to work in her laboratory. I am grateful for your patience, optimism, encouragement and knowledge throughout the entirety of my work at your laboratory. Thank you to my mentor Vincent Sutera. Thank you for the time and support you gave me in allowing me to develop as a scientist. You instilled in me the importance of being organized in my thinking when carrying out my experiments and devising the next plans of action. These are qualities that go beyond the laboratory setting and will stay with me for the rest of my life. I would also like to thank everyone who worked with me in the Lovett lab. You were all very welcoming and provided a supportive environment during my experience. Thank you to all my friends. Special thanks to Elena for motivation and support. Thank you to the faculty in the Biochemistry Department for nourishing my love of biochemistry throughout my research. Thank you to my family for encouraging me and providing me with the support to always be ambitious. iii ABSTRACT Purification of Escherichia coli YoaA, a Putative Helicase A thesis presented to the Department of Biochemistry Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Mark Gregory All cells must maintain their genomic integrity to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribonuclease H Function in Bacillus Subtilis
    Ribonuclease H Function in Bacillus subtilis by Justin R. Randall A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Lyle A. Simmons, Chair Professor Ursula Jakob Assistant Professor Jayakrishnan Nandakumar Professor Nils Walter Justin R. Randall [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5429-8995 © Justin R. Randall 2018 DEDICATION For my mother and father. Without your love and support this document, and come to think of it I myself, would not exist. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I’ve read that Oscar Wilde once said, “Success is a science; if you have the conditions, you get the result.” Oscar Wilde wasn’t a scientist, but in my humble opinion Lyle Simmons sets up pretty damn favorable conditions. From the moment I first met Lyle I knew I wanted to work in his lab. After introducing myself to him outside his office he said to me while I shook his hand, “I need to go to the bathroom want to come with me?” If I could go back I would have responded with a confident, “Sure.” But instead I awkwardly replied, “Umm…I think I’ll wait.” That was an awesomely odd first encounter which blossomed into a wonderful mentor/mentee and social relationship. If I were to try to engineer a dream Principle Investigator (PI), they would be to Lyle’s specs. I really could not have asked for a better mentor to lead me through my Ph.D. Thank you so much for all of your help and support throughout the last 5 years.
    [Show full text]