DOCSLIB.ORG

Professor Michael Baxandall: Influential Art Historian with a Rigorously Cerebral Approach to the Study of Painting and Sculpture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Professor Michael Baxandall: Influential Art Historian with a Rigorously Cerebral Approach to the Study of Painting and Sculpture Professor Michael Baxandall: Influential art historian with a rigorously cerebral approach to the study of painting and sculpture Michael Baxandall was one of the greatest and most influential art historians of the second half of the 20th century, responsible for the introduction of ideas about language and rhetoric into the study of works of art and a key figure in establishing art history as a subject with its own intellectual rigour. He was born in Cardiff in 1933 into an upper middle-class family with long connections to museums – his grandfather was Keeper of Scientific Instruments at the Science Museum and his father was Director of the Manchester City Art Galleries and the National Galleries of Scotland. He was educated at Manchester Grammar School and Downing College, Cambridge, where he read English and was much influenced by the works of William Empson and F.R. Leavis, by whom he was taught and who focused his interest on language. After graduating, he went to study in Italy at the University of Pavia and in Germany at the University of Munich. His book The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany, published to great acclaim in 1980, was said to have originated in his time as a lonely postgraduate student seeking consolation in the museums of mid-1950s Munich. On his return to London in 1958, Baxandall was offered a job by Gertrud Bing to work in the Photographic Collection of the Warburg Institute, and, the following year, he was awarded a Junior Research Fellowship at the institute, to study for a PhD on the notion of decorum and restraint in 15th- century Italy, under the supervision of Ernst Gombrich. The Warburg, where he met his wife, Kay, was to remain a spiritual and intellectual home, in spite of the fact that he could be occasionally sardonic about its characteristics and did not fit easily or comfortably into an intellectual school. In 1961, Baxandall was appointed Assistant Keeper in the Department of Architecture and Sculpture at the Victoria and Albert Museum, where he worked for four years on German sculpture under John Pope-Hennessy as Keeper and, more especially, Terence Hodgkinson, the Deputy Keeper. He was not a natural museum type, but later claimed to like the disciplines of museum life and, slightly idiosyncratically, listed "antiquary" as his profession in his passport. It was with relief that he was able to retreat to a university lectureship at the Warburg Institute in 1965, where he devoted himself to the research which was supposed to be for a doctorate, but was never submitted and which led to the publication of his first book, Giotto and the Orators, in the Oxford- Warburg series in 1971. It is hard now to reconstruct the impact which both Giotto and the Orators, a book about how humanists wrote about art, and the immediately subsequent Painting and Experience in Fifteenth- Century Italy (1972), had on the professional study of art history. Up until the early 1970s, most art history had been written from the viewpoint of connoisseurship and attribution, reconstructing the oeuvre of artists from surviving works of art. Baxandall's approach was rigorously cerebral, studying works of art from the surrounding mental universe, humanist culture in the case of Giotto and the Orators and vernacular culture in Painting and Experience. He was happy to study account books and mathematical manuals and, most of all, books of rhetoric as a way of understanding how artists such as Giotto and Piero della Francesca, as well as their public (the distinction is never clear) viewed their world. The practice of art was viewed as an activity of the intellect at least as much as of the eye. Following the publication of these two books, Baxandall was established as a major intellectual figure, invited to be Slade Professor of Fine Art in Oxford in 1974, where he lectured on German sculpture. But he resisted categorisation, did not particularly enjoy postgraduate teaching (although he was an inspirational figure to students), and could be wilfully obtuse in his attitude to methodology, as when he was invited by New Literary History to reflect on his approach to the writing of art history. Instead, as art history became increasingly recondite, Baxandall did not like to be associated with a movement towards over-conceptualisation and was an advocate of cool, intellectual rigour in opposition to the more self-consciously learned traditions of the Warburg. Baxandall's greatest book was The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany, which won the Mitchell Prize for art history and in which he subjects an unfamiliar field of study to deep, systematic analysis, attentive as always to the relationship between language and form. He was awarded a chair by London University in 1981 and was made a Fellow of the British Academy in 1982, but was increasingly lured away to the United States, where he was appointed A.D. White Professor-at-Large at Cornell University, was given a MacArthur Foundation award, and became a half-time Professor of the History of Art at the University of California, Berkeley in 1987. From this point onwards he led a hybrid life, partly in London, partly in California. In 1994, Baxandall wrote jointly with Svetlana Alpers Tiepolo and the Pictorial Intelligence and, the following year, under sole authorship, the book Shadows and the Enlightenment. Neither had quite the broad impact of his earlier work, although like all his work, they were the product of systematic and highly original thought. By now, he was suffering from Parkinson's disease, which clouded the later years of his life, although he bore it with characteristic fortitude and continued to write and publish to the end, including, in 2003, Words for Pictures. It was perhaps this illness, along with his reclusive temperament, that prevented him from receiving the full recognition beyond the scholarly community that the quality of his intellect and the originality of his writing deserved. Michael David Kighley Baxandall, art historian: born Cardiff 18 August 1933; Junior Research Fellow, Warburg Institute, London University 1959-61, Lecturer in Renaissance Studies 1965-73, Reader in History of the Classical Tradition 1973-81, Professor of History of the Classical Tradition 1981-88; Assistant Keeper, Department of Architecture and Sculpture, Victoria and Albert Museum 1961-65; Slade Professor of Fine Art, Oxford University 1974-75; A.D. White Professor-at-Large, Cornell University 1982-88; FBA 1982; Professor of the History of Art, University of California, Berkeley 1987-96 (Emeritus); married 1963 Kay Simon (one son, one daughter); died London 12 August 2008 The Independent, Tuesday 19 August 2008 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Professor Alex Potts
    CURRICULUM VITAE Professor Alex Potts Date of Birth 1 October 1943 Education 1965 BA(Hons) in mathematics, physics and chemistry, University of Toronto, Canada: first class 1966 Diploma in Advanced Mathematics, University of Oxford l966-9 Research in theoretical chemistry at University of Oxford 197O Diploma in the History of Art, University of Oxford (special subject ‘Baudelaire and the Artists of his Time’): distinction l97O-3 Registered as a full-time research student in art history at the Warburg Institute, University of London l978 PhD, University of London (thesis title: Winckelmann's Interpretation of the History of Ancient Art in its Eighteenth Century Context) Teaching Appointments 1971-3 Part-time Lecturer in the Department of Fine Art, Portsmouth Polytechnic l973-81 Lecturer in the history of art at the University of East Anglia, Norwich l98l-9 Senior Lecturer in the history of art at Camberwell College of Arts; from 1984, Principal Lecturer; Acting Head of Department (Art History and Conservation) in 1987 and 1989 l984 Guest Professor for one term at the University of Osnabrück, Germany 1989-95 Senior Lecturer in the history of art and Head of Art History, Department of Historical and Cultural Studies, Goldsmiths College, University of London 1992 Visiting Professor for one month at University of California, Berkeley 1993 Visiting Professor for the Spring semester at University of California, Berkeley 1994 Visiting Professor for the Summer semester at University of California, Irvine 1996-2002 Professor of History of Art,
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Baxandall February 3Rd, 1994, Berkeley, CA
    Interview with Michael Baxandall February 3rd, 1994, Berkeley, CA Allan Langdale A. L. - I would be interested to find out who your first intellectual mentors were and what your experiences were in your early university education. I suppose I’m looking for some early formations of your intellectual interests. M. B. – Well, I suppose, quite certainly it would be F. R. Leavis.1 Have you ever heard of F. R. Leavis? A. L. - Yes. M. B. - I read English at Cambridge. I’d got into Cambridge on Classics but changed to English, and was taught by Leavis at Downing College. I think still he’s the largest influence I’m aware of. But in a curious way it’s not really a matter of one’s work looking like his. It was the first time I was intellectually excited. There were all sorts of aspects of his work which I still admire, certainly. A. L. - Was he also a model as an educator? M. B. - He was a problematic—no, problematic is the wrong word—but he was a difficult man, and many people disliked him. I didn't dislike him. I wasn’t personally close to him, but there was a moral urgency about his approach to literature which could take forms in literary criticism which one might not want, but which I still find admirable. I thought about this a couple of years ago when someone writing yet another book about Leavis wrote to me and asked what I felt about the influence of Leavis on people who had worked outside literary criticism, because I was one, and I thought about it quite a lot because, it’s interesting, it’s very difficult to pin down particulars when you’re working in different fields and I’ve got friends who are also people from Leavis who are now anthropologists or whatever and they are different again but, you know, there’s something consistent in all these people.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Beth Williamson
    Art history in the art school: the critical historians of Camberwell Beth Williamson Introduction The impetus for this paper came early on in Tate’s four year research project ‘Art School Educated: Institutional Change and Curriculum Development in UK Art Schools 1960-2010.’ The teaching of art history in the art school quickly emerged as a subject of key significance not only for the project and the development of art education, but also for the development of art history as a discipline. Michael Podro (1931-2008) was well known for his contribution to art history and how it has developed over the last 50 years. That Podro formally established the Art History Department at Camberwell School of Arts and Crafts (known as Camberwell College of Arts since 1989 and now part of the University of the Arts, London) in the early 1960s, close on the heels of William Coldstream’s (1908-1987) sweeping reforms, recommends him as a figure worthy of further study within the context of art education. This paper, therefore, seeks to make some contribution to an understanding of how Podro’s intellectual commitments informed his approach to art education at Camberwell and, at the same time, how his exposure to artists during this formative period inflected his art theory. The DipAD and art historical instruction In the late 1950s the inadequacies of British art education were widely recognised.1 As artist and educator Robert Medley recalled: The examinations for the National Diplomas in Design (NDD) for Sculpture and Painting had long been regarded with something approaching contempt.
    [Show full text]
  • EDWARD CHANEY RB Kitaj (1932-2007): Warburgian Artist
    Edward Chaney, R.B. Kitaj (1932-2007): Warburgian Artist EDWARD CHANEY R.B. Kitaj (1932-2007): Warburgian Artist ABSTRACT This essay examines the influence of Aby Warburg and the Warburg Institute, as mediated by Edgar Wind, on R.B. Kitaj from the late 1950s until his death in 2007. It is based on research in the National Portrait Gallery, the Warburg Institute Archive, the Wind archives in Oxford, Kitaj’s unpublished autobiography and correspondence between the author and the artist dating back to 1972. It explores Kitaj’s creative response to Warburg’s brand of cultural history which encouraged his early eschewal of the prevailing focus upon formal values in favour of ‘symbolic images’ and suggestive content. This tendency was enhanced by his increasing celebration of his Jewishness and aspirations towards the creation of ‘a Jewish art like the Egyptian figurative style’. Kitaj's portrait of Ernst Gombrich (1986) was commissioned by the National Portrait Gallery at a time when he was becoming obsessed with his Jewish project while Gombrich was confirming his rejection of the category Jewish, in other than a religious context, altogether. Discussion of Jewishness and the arts in the twentieth century is supplemented by the identification of David Allan's Origin of Painting (done in Italy in 1775) as the inspiration for Kitaj's Los Angeles series of pictures in which his late, lamented wife is depicted as the Hebrew deity, Shekinah. ‘Symbolic forms are coined in the depths of human experiences…’ from Fritz Saxl’s lecture on ‘Warburg’s Visit to New Mexico’1 ‘... invent a Jewish style, like the Egyptian figure style… ABY WARBURG: Jewish Prophet of my Oxford youth (see my Confessions of an Old Jewish Painter, soon to be published).
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Baxandall 1749.Indd
    MICHAEL BAXANDALL Michael David Kighley Baxandall 1933–2008 MICHAEL BAXANDALL was probably the most important art historian of his generation, not just in Britain but in the world. In a series of books published between 1971 and 2003 he kept expanding the frontiers of the discipline, introducing new topics, new ways of writing, and new explana- tory models, always demanding of himself and his readers an undis- sembling clarity of thought and expression. If art history is now a fi eld that can hold its own with more established areas of the humanities it is largely because he had a talent to transmit to others through the printed page the powerful intellectual resources he had built up through tireless inward refl ection. These resources he applied with equal engagement to Italian Renaissance art criticism, German wood sculpture, the under- standing of shadows in the eighteenth century, the planning of the Forth Bridge, and the functions of the neural structure of the retina. An intel- lectual pied piper, who during his working life moved easily from the museum to the university and from Britain to the United States, he showed with charm how a lofty mind could be at home not just with the intellec- tual and the aesthetic but also with the material, the physical and the mechanical. His magic as a guide to his contemporaries and to younger genera- tions lay in his understanding of words. There was no one in the fi eld who was so aware, both of their role in the formation of artistic culture and their instrumental value as the tools of the writer of art history.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 2009
    Our first Annual Newsletter for Friends of the Department Detail of a colossal battle sarcophagus (the so-called “Great Ludovisi Sarcophagus”). Rome, ca. 250-260 ad. Marble, 5’ high. In Palazzo Altemps, Museo Nazionale Romano, Rome. Photo: Mont Allen. FLESH EATERS An International Symposium on Roman Sarcophagi [sarcophagus, pl. sarcophagi — L. sarcophagus, Gr. sarkofavgoj, orig. adj., f. savrx, sarko-, flesh + -favgoj, eating.] 1. A kind of stone reputed among the Greeks to have the property of consuming the flesh of dead bodies deposited in it, and consequently used for coffins. To be held Friday and Saturday, September 18th and 19th 2009, in the auditorium of the Berkeley Art Museum. Organized by T.J. Clark and Chris Hallett, the conference will center on the question of how we interpret the distinctive imagery carved on Roman sarcophagi, some of the most beautiful and astonishing works to come from the ancient world. Gathering scholars from Germany, Italy, England, Canada, and the United States, the conference features a keynote address by Paul Zanker, whose recent book on mythological sarcophagi, Mit Mythen leben (Living with Myth), has propelled these neglected objects into the spotlight, reminding art- and cultural historians alike of their centrality for understanding Roman art and its reception in later periods. Interested in attending? Look out for announcements on the Art History departmental website in the coming weeks. Contents DEPARTMENTAL NEWS 3 A DECADE OF TRAVEL SEMINARS 11 NEW FACULTY MEMBERS 4 FACULTY NOTES 16 History of Art, University California, Berkeley Spring 2 0 0 9 POST-DOCTORAL FELLOWS 6 FACULTY HONORS AND PRIZES 23 IN MEMORIAM M.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBSTANCE, SENSATION, and PERCEPTION Michael Baxandall
    SUBSTANCE, SENSATION, AND PERCEPTION Michael Baxandall Interviewed by Richard Cándida Smith Art History Oral Documentation Project Compiled under the auspices of the Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities Copyright © 1998 The J. Paul Getty Trust COPYRIGHT LAW The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. RESTRICTIONS ON THIS INTERVIEW None. LITERARY RIGHTS AND QUOTATION This manuscript is hereby made available for research purposes only. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publication, are reserved to the Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Assistant Director for Resource Collections of the Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities. * * * Frontispiece: Michael Baxandall, 1998. Photograph courtesy of Michael Baxandall. ii [Page numbers in the Table of Contents and the Index correspond to the bound version of the transcript, not this digital version.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Visual Attention
    Arbeitsberichte 19 Michael Baxandall Art and Visual Attention Born 1933 in Cardiff, UK. Studied literature at the Universities of Cambridge and Pavia (Italy), and art history at the University of München and the Warburg Institute, University of London. 1973 — 88, Reader, then Professor in the History of the Classical Tradition at the Warburg Institute. Since 1985, Professor of the History of Art, University of California at Berkeley. Books: Giotto and the Orators (1971), Painting and Experience in 15th-Century Italy (1972), The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany (1980), Patterns of Intention (1985). — Address: Department of History, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA At the beginning of the year I arrived with the intention of working on three topics. First, my colleague Svetlana Alpers and I wanted to complete a book we had in rough draft on the eighteenth-century painter Tiepolo. Second, developing out of this, I wanted to read and think about the disin- tegration in the later eighteenth century of the European sense of the moral and social value of pure virtuosity in a craft. Third, I wanted to do heavy reading for a long-term project on visual attention, in which mod- ern and eighteenth-century conceptions are set in contrast; the eighteenth- century reading had mainly been done, but the modern had not. This third project was the most active because it was continuous with a book I had finished in that previous summer on shadows and our perception of shadow — one of the problems of shadows being that we do not usually attend to them, as shadows.
    [Show full text]