Msukaligwa(Davel)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Msukaligwa(Davel) Transnet - Swazi Rail Link – Msukaligwa Local Municipality - Davel Stock Yard Socio-economic impact analysis Draft Glossary Corridors : A corridor is a linear strip of land or area, connecting large activity nodes, traversing urban or inter-urban areas, surrounding a major transport facility or facilities providing an appropriate regional level of mobility and accessibility to adjacent areas, and containing a high concentration of population and mixed land uses” and “… accommodate major linear transport routes like heavy and light rail and/or freeways, large shopping concentrations etc., social, cultural and sporting facilities as well as a large amount of residential accommodation”. Density : The number of units per unit of land area, e.g. dwelling units/ hectare. There are five measures of density: i. population density: people / hectare. ii. gross dwelling unit density: dwelling units / total land area of a project or suburb including roads, public open space and non-residential land uses. iii. net dwelling unit density: dwelling units / land occupied by residential plots only. iv. building density: area of buildings / hectare. v. settlement density: (dwelling units / total land occupied by settlement) also known as average gross dwelling units density. Densification : Densification is the increased use of space both horizontally and vertically within existing areas/ properties and new developments, accompanied by an increased number of units and/or population threshold. Efficiency : Development that maximises development goals such as sustainability, integration, accessibility, affordability, and quality of living, relative to financial, environmental, and social costs, including on-going and future costs. Infill Development: Development of vacant or under-utilised land within existing settlements in order to optimise the use of infrastructure, increase urban densities and promote integration. Integrated Development Plan: The strategic municipal development plan, reviewed on an annual basis, required by the MSA (Act 32 of 2000) which guides municipal decisions and budgets. Land Use Management: Establishing or implementing any measure to regulate the use or a change in the form or function of land, and includes land development. Land Use Management System : A system used to regulate land use in a municipality, including a town planning or zoning scheme, or policies related to how land is used on a plot by plot basis. Nodes: Nodes are focused areas where a higher intensity of land uses and activities are supported and promoted. Typically any given municipal area would accommodate a hierarchy of nodes that indicates the relative intensity of development anticipated for the various nodes, their varying sizes, and their dominant nature. Spatial planning: planning of the way in which different activities, land uses and buildings are located in relation to each other, in terms of distance between them, proximity to each other and the way in which spatial considerations influence and are influenced by economic, social, political, infrastructural and environmental considerations. Spatial Development Framework: A Spatial development Framework (SDF) is a core component of a Municipality’s economic, sectoral, spatial, social, institutional, environmental vision. In other words it is a tool for moving towards a desired spatial form for the Municipality. Sector Plans: Municipal plans for different functions such as bio-diversity conservation, housing, transport, local economic development and disaster management. They may also be geographically based, for example a sub-region, settlement within a local Municipality or a component of that settlement. Stakeholders : Agencies, organisations, groups or individuals who have a direct or indirect interest in a development intervention or its evaluation. Town Planning Scheme or Zoning Scheme: A legal instrument for regulating the use of land in terms of provincial or national legislation, see Land Use Management System. 5 July 2013 Page 2 Urban Edge: The urban edge is defined as an indicative boundary within the municipality with the sole purpose of containing physical development and sprawl and re-directing growth towards a more integrated, compact and efficient urban form. Acronyms AU Animal unit CMIP Comprehensive Municipal Infrastructure Plan CRC Capital Replacement Cost DEA Department of Environmental Affairs DFA Development Facilitation Act (Act 67 of 1995) DoH Department of Health GVA Gross value added IDP Integrated Development Plan LED Local Economic Development LM Local Municipality LUMS Land Use Management System MSA Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000) MTREF Medium Term Revenue and Expenditure Framework NEMA National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998) NSDP National Spatial Development Perspective PGDS Provincial Growth and Development Strategy SANParks South African National Parks SDF Spatial Development Framework SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats VIP Ventilated Improved Pit Latrine WSA Water Services Act (Act 108 of 1997) 5 July 2013 Page 3 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Regional Setting ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Location ................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Socio Economic Profile .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Data and data sources ............................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Demographic consideration ..................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Size ...................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Population age distribution .................................................................................................. 8 3.2.3 Population growth rate ......................................................................................................... 9 3.2.4 Future expected growth ..................................................................................................... 10 3.2.5 Spatial aspects of the population ....................................................................................... 11 3.3 Labour and Economic Analysis ............................................................................................. 14 3.3.1 Description of the Msukaligwa Local Municipality Labour force ........................................ 14 3.3.2 Employment productivity ................................................................................................... 17 3.3.3 Economic structure and performance................................................................................ 20 4 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 25 4.1 Msukaligwa Local Municipality .............................................................................................. 25 4.1.1 Settlement Patterns ........................................................................................................... 25 4.1.2 Agriculture .......................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.3 Mining ................................................................................................................................ 26 4.1.4 Tourism .............................................................................................................................. 26 4.1.5 Forestry .............................................................................................................................. 26 5 Risks and Benefits .......................................................................................................................... 27 6 Works Cited .................................................................................................................................... 28 5 July 2013 Page 4 Index of figures Figure 1: Population Pyramid .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 2: Msukaligwa population growth (1996 – 2011) ......................................................................... 9 Figure 4: Forecasted population growth ................................................................................................ 10 Figure 5: Composition of the labour force ............................................................................................ 14 Figure 6: Change in economic active population (No. of people) ......................................................... 15 Figure 7: Change in formal employment (No. of people) ...................................................................... 15 Figure 8: Change of informal employment (No. of People) ................................................................... 16 Figure 9: Change in unemployment (No. of people) ............................................................................. 16
Recommended publications
  • Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed Magisterial District Ermelo Main Seat of Msukaligwa Magisterial District
    # # !C # # ### !C^ !.C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # !C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # #!C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # !C # !C # #^ # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # # !C # # !C# # # # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # ## #!C # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # !C # # # ##!C ## ## ## # # # # # # # # # #^ # # ## # # # !C # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # ## # ##^ # !C #!C## # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C # #!C # # #!C # # !C## # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # ## ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # #!C # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C # # !C # # !C ## # # # # #!C # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C# # ## # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # ### #!C# # # !C !C# # !C # ## # # # # # # # # !C# # !.# # # # ## ## # #!C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ### ##^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # ^ # !C# ## # # # # # # !C## # ## # # # # ## # # # # # ## # # # # #!C## !C# # !C# ## # !C### # # ^ # # # !C ### # # # !C# ##!C # !C # # # ^ !C ## # # #!C # ## ## # # ## # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # ## ## # # # # !C # # ^ # ## # ## # # # !.!C ## # # ## # # # # !C # # !C# # ### # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## !C #
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K: Heritage (Including Cultural Aspects) Study
    SLR Consulting (Africa) (Pty) Ltd Page K APPENDIX K: HERITAGE (INCLUDING CULTURAL ASPECTS) STUDY SLR Project 710.02038.00001 Commissiekraal Coal Mine including support services and January 2018 Report No. 4 (FINAL) associated infrastructure Specialist Name: Dr Julius CC Pistorius Company: N.a. (Independent specialists consultant) Address 8 5th Avenue Cashan x1 Rustenburg 0299 Contact number: C0825545449 Date: 09 March 2016 SPECIALIST REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AS PER SECTION 32 OF THE EIA REGULATIONS, 2010 This letter has been prepared to report on the compliance of Dr Julius Pistorius as part of the specialist reporting requirements under Section 32 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 from the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act no. 107 of 1999) for the (A Phase I Heritage Impact Assessment for the Proposed Commissieskraal Coal Mine on the Farm Commissieskraal 90HT to the East of Wakkerstroom in the Kwa Zulu/Natal Province of South Africa) prepared for the environmental impact assessment and the environmental management programme for the proposed Commissiekraal Coal Mine. 33. (1) An applicant or the EAP managing an application may appoint a person who is independent to carry out a specialist study or specialised process 33. (2)(a)(i) the person who prepared the report Dr Julius Pistorius 33. (2)(a)(ii) the expertise of that person to carry out the specialist study or specialised process; See Appendix A: Details of the Specialist 33. (2)(b) declaration that the person is independent in a form as may be specified by the competent authority; See Appendix B: Declaration of Independence 33. (2) (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared; See chapter 2 "Terms of reference" 33.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Mpumalanga Province
    Section B: DistrictProfile MpumalangaHealth Profiles Province 13 Mpumalanga Province Gert Sibande District Municipality (DC30) Overview of the district The Gert Sibande District Municipalitya is a Category C municipality located in the Mpumalanga Province. It is bordered by the Ehlanzeni and Nkangala District Municipalities to the north, KwaZulu-Natal and the Free State to the south, Swaziland to the east, and Gauteng to the west. The district is the largest of the three districts in the province, making up almost half of its geographical area. It is comprised of seven local municipalities: Govan Mbeki, Chief Albert Luthuli, Msukaligwa, Dipaleseng, Mkhondo, Lekwa and Pixley Ka Seme. Highways that pass through Gert Sibande District Municipality include the N11, which goes through to the N2 in KwaZulu-Natal, the N17 from Gauteng passing through to Swaziland, and the N3 from Gauteng to KwaZulu-Natal. Area: 31 841km² Population (2016)b: 1 158 573 Population density (2016): 36.4 persons per km2 Estimated medical scheme coverage: 13.5% Cities/Towns: Amersfoort, Amsterdam, Balfour, Bethal, Breyten, Carolina, Charl Cilliers, Chrissiesmeer, Davel, Ekulindeni, Embalenhle, Empuluzi, Ermelo, Evander, Greylingstad, Grootvlei, Kinross, Leandra, Lothair, Morgenzon, Perdekop, Secunda, Standerton, Trichardt, Volksrust, Wakkerstroom, eManzana, eMkhondo (Piet Retief). Main Economic Sectors: Manufacturing (57.4%), agriculture (41.4%), trade (25.8%), transport (24.5%), finance (21.2%), mining (14.1%), community services (12.3%), construction (2.1%). Population distribution, local municipality boundaries and health facility locations Source: Mid-Year Population Estimates 2016, Stats SA. a The Local Government Handbook South Africa 2017. A complete guide to municipalities in South Africa. Seventh edition. Accessible at: www.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Developments Facing SA Coal Logistics”
    “Challenges and developments facing SA Coal Logistics” IHS Energy SA Coal Conference 1 February 2019 Mandisa Mondi, General Manager: Coal BU - Transnet Freight Rail Transnet Freight Rail is a division of Transnet SOC Ltd Reg no.: 1990/000900/30 An Authorised Financial 1 Service Provider – FSP 18828 Overview SA Competitiveness The Transnet Business and Mandate The Coal Line: Profile Export Coal Philosophy Challenges and Opportunities New Developments Conclusions Transnet Freight Rail is a division of Transnet SOC Ltd Reg no.: 1990/000900/30 2 SA Competitiveness: Global Reserves Global Reserves (bt) Global Production (mt) Despite large reserves of coal that remain across the world, electricity generation alternatives are USA 1 237.29 2 906 emerging and slowing down dependence on coal. Russia 2 157.01 6 357 European countries have diversified their 3 114.5 1 3,87 China energy mix reducing reliance on coal Australia 4 76.46 3 644 significantly. India 5 60.6 4 537 However, Asia and Africa are still at a level where countries are facilitating access to Germany 6 40.7 8 185 basic electricity and advancing their Ukraine 7 33.8 10 60 industrial sectors, and are likely to strongly Kazakhstan 8 33.6 9 108 rely on coal for power generation. South Africa 9 30.1 7 269 South Africa remains in the top 10 producing Indonesia 10 28 5 458 countries putting it in a fairly competitive level with the rest of global producers. Source: World Energy Council 2016 SA Competitiveness : Coal Quality Country Exports Grade Heating value Ash Sulphur (2018) USA 52mt B 5,850 – 6,000 14% 1.0% Indonesia 344mt C 5,500 13.99% Australia 208mt B 5,850 – 6,000 15% 0.75% Russia 149.3mt B 5,850 – 6,000 15% 0.75% Colombia 84mt B 5,850 – 6,000 11% 0.85% S Africa 78mt B 5,500 - 6,000 17% 1.0% South Africa’s coal quality is graded B , the second best coal quality in the world and Grade Calorific Value Range (in kCal/kg) compares well with major coal exporting countries globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    FF F Msukaligwa Local 1e- + Municipality AMENDED 2020 / 2021 IDP ii Foreword by the Executive Mayor Since the dawn of democracy, practitioners of public affairs have been called upon to refine and rationalize the various forms of public engagements to ensure the best outcomes for all stakeholders. Public management and governance has seen a myriad of demands on the rules of engagement, implementation of decisions and accounting for outcomes. Our local government sphere often faces the perennial demands to achieve more with disproportionately meagre resources. This scenario calls for closer interaction and appreciation of priorities as modern society becomes more diverse, not only on cultures or values but also on generational tastes and expectations. Maximum attendance, meaningful participation, rational expectations, are virtues than still need to be cultivated further if we are to emerge from consultations with the requisite outcome of our consultation. The advent of the Corona-virus and the subsequent declaration of the lockdown, might put a damper on our consultation. Public participation as we know it has been restricted to video conferencing or other form of electronic communication. This method has a potential of polarising communities and create some form of unnecessary 'class struggle'. We all appreciate the dire choices we faced and have left no stone unturned in ensuring that all forms of communication are utilized to bring the message of consultation home. Inadvertently, the lockdown regulations confined residents to their homes and it could be assumed that they were therefore available to listen to the radio and had the time to read the publications we sent out.
    [Show full text]
  • Msukaligwa Local Municipality
    DRAFT IDP 2010/2011 ii Foreword by the Executive Mayor The Constitution, Act 108 of 1996 requires municipalities to „promote the social and economic development of the people and communities. We have been entrusted with providing basic services on continuous basis to both rural and urban areas, and also to ensure that development in these communities is sustainable. Our IDP takes a closer look at creating an enabling environment for local as well as international investors, thus contributing to economic growth and job creation. This is in line with the provincial growth and development strategy. The IDP is a key document on daily work and programme of the municipality. The Spatial Development Plan is an important part of the IDP. The SDP refer to the planning choices that municipality need to make when it comes to densification, the encroachment of development and the location of new settlement. The Municipality has embarked on a process of ensuring the implementation of key priority policies on Women, Youth and People with disabilities empowerment and Gender equity, HIV/AIDS, Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment, Employment equity and Transformation, Skills development and Good governance. All policies and relevant implementation framework have been drawn within the prescripts of national and provincial legislation. We acknowledge the challenges of service delivery in the last decade and that we have not been able to meet all the needs identified as priorities due to budgetary constraints. We however wish to mobilize all our resources in a focused, transparent and equitable manner in order to address the pressing service delivery challenges and also request for your participation and contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexure 2.3 Advert.Pdf
    Friday, 25 January 2013 HIGHVELDER 19 Op soek na ‘n vriendelike kantoor dame Vereistes • Stiptelik en netjies en tweetalig Notices / Vacancies • Ouderdom tussen 30 & 40 jaar met bestuurslisensie • Ondervinding in debiteure / krediteure • Moet bereid wees om met kontant te werk • Vorige ondervinding sal voordelig wees DIE HOËVELDER VERSPREI WEEKLIKS • Goeie kliëntediens kan lewer • Pastel is voordelig maar nie ‘n vereiste • Salaris onderhandelbaar Faks CVs gerus deur na 017 819 1303 of e-pos na 082 566 [email protected] of lewer af by 18 000 Ermelo Scrap Metals 25.1.13 / 6x2 10 For the perfect candidate, koerante in Ermelo, Wesselton, Carolina, Breyten, LAERSKOOL advertise your vacancies Hendrina, Lothair, Davel, Badplaas, Amsterdam, JJ VD MERWE in the Morgenzon, Chrissiesmeer VAKANTE BETREKKING ADMIN POS SCOPING, EIA AND IWULA PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS Aansoeke word ingewag vir toepas- MDEDET Reference Number: 17/2/3 GS-146 lik gekwalifiseerde persone PROPOSED COAL MINING OF COAL AND THE ASSOCIATED VEREISTES: ACTIVITIES ON THE ABOVEMENTIONED PROPERTY • Goeie sekretariële ondervinding en Location: Farm MOOIFONTEIN 109 IT, VOORSLAG 274 IS, STERK- vaardigheid in Rekenaargeletterdheid STRAUSS FONTEIN 242 IS and VLAKFONTEIN 108 IS in: Application for environmental authorisation to undertake the following activities: • MS Excel, MS Word, MS PowerPoint, PROKUREURS In terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended MS Publisher, MS Outlook & Internet Sections 24 and 24(d) and read with Government Notice R544, 545 and a Scoping EIA is required in • Goeie interpersoonlike verhoudinge ONTVANGS / SKAKELBORD terms of the following listed activities: • Ondervinding in skool admin. / ADMIN POS Indicate the number Activity No(s) Describe each listed activity: STERK AANBEVELING: and date of the relevant (in terms of the Vereistes: Government Notice: relevant notice): • Ondervinding van Edupac program sal voorkeur geniet.
    [Show full text]
  • MDE All Public Schools - Address List 2003
    MDE all public schools - address list 2003 REGION GERT SIBANDE CIRCUIT 07 BALFOUR EMIS Postal address Physical address TEL. / FAX 000232 AMUKELANI PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 238 BRAKFONTEIN FARM 017-7703588 BALFOUR 2410 BALFOUR - 000489 BALFOUR PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 144 CHEF STREET, 017-773 0101 BALFOUR 2410 BALFOUR 017-773 0101 000810 BEERLAAGTE PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 213 ELDORADO FARM 01777-9 0328 GROOTVLEI 2420 - 001172 BLOEKOMLAAN PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 993 RIETFONTEIN FARM - BALFOUR 2410 - 001487 BONUKUKHANYA PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 91 2678 MONARENG STREET 017-773 0299 BALFOUR 2410 SIYATHEMBA - 001628 BOTJHABELA PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 290 LINDEN FARM, 017-7798257 GROOTVLEI 2420 GROOTVLEI - 003731 ENHLALAKAHLE PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 53 RIETFONTEIN FARM - BALFOUR 2410 - 004465 GEKOMBINEERDE SKOOL BALFOUR POSBUS 42 MINNAARSTRAAT, 110 017-773 0256 BALFOUR 2410 BALFOUR 017-773 0068 004853 GROOTVLEI PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 57 LEEUSPRUIT FARM - GROOTVLEI 2420 - 005603 I M MANCHU SECONDARY SCHOOL P O BOX 885 CNR VOORTREKKER, & 017-773 0989 FRANK, STR BALFOUR 2410 BALFOUR 017-7730989 006718 ISIFISOSETHU SECONDARY SCHOOL P O BOX 534 3803 017-773 0488 BALFOUR 2410 LEFOKOTSANE STR - 006767 ISIPHESIHLE PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 218 RUSTFONTEIN FARM, 017-778 0241 BALFOUR 2410 BALFOUR NORTH - 006825 ITHUTENG PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 10 LEEUWFONTEIN FARM 0839505499 GROOTVLEI 2420 - 008029 KLEINSKUUR PRIMARY SCHOOL P O BOX 84 KLEINSKUUR AF 7 017-773 1080 BALFOUR 2410 RIETBULT FARM - 009175 LAERSKOOL GREYLINGSTAD POSBUS 37 HV BEZUIDENHOUD & 017-7780410 DREYERSTRAAT
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Resources Impact Assessment for the Proposed Swaziland Rail Link, Western Section, Mpumalanga Region
    Cultural heritage impact assessment for THE PROPOSED SWAZILAND RAIL LINK, WESTERN SECTION, MPUMALANGA REGION Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Swaziland Rail Link, Mpumalanga CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED SWAZILAND RAIL LINK, WESTERN SECTION, MPUMALANGA REGION Report No: 2013/JvS/063 Status: Final Revision No: 0 Date: September 2013 Prepared for: Aurecon Representative: Dr P Botha Postal Address: Aurecon Centre, Lynnwood Bridge Office Park, 4 Daventry St., Lynnwood Manor, 0081 Tel: 012 427 2529 E-mail: [email protected] Prepared by: J van Schalkwyk (D Litt et Phil), Heritage Consultant ASAPA Registration No.: 168 Principal Investigator: Iron Age, Colonial Period, Industrial Heritage Postal Address: 62 Coetzer Avenue, Monument Park, 0181 Mobile: 076 790 6777 Fax: 012 347 7270 E-mail: [email protected] Declaration: I, J.A. van Schalkwyk, declare that I do not have any financial or personal interest in the proposed development, nor its developers or any of their subsidiaries, apart from the provision of heritage assessment and management services. J A van Schalkwyk (D Litt et Phil) Heritage Consultant September 2013 i Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Swaziland Rail Link, Mpumalanga EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES SCOPING ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED SWAZILAND RAIL LINK, WESTERN SECTION, MPUMALANGA REGION Currently, much of the coal from the South African inland coalfields is transported via the existing Coal Line through Ermelo to Richards Bay. Transnet commissioned a feasibility study to evaluate the possibility of a rail link from Ermelo utilising the Buhrmanskop - Lothair branch-line to connect with the Swaziland rail network, and eventually to the Port of Richards Bay or Maputo, a strategic rail link with 20t minimum axle loading making the best use of installed infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • (1 September 2017 – to Date) SUPERIOR COURTS ACT 10 of 2013
    (1 September 2017 – to date) SUPERIOR COURTS ACT 10 OF 2013 (Gazette No. 36743, Notice No. 615 dated 12 August 2013. Commencement date: 23 August 2013 [Proc. No. R36, Gazette No. 36774]- with the exception of sections 29, 37 and 45 and Items No. 11 of Schedule 1 and No. 1.1 of Schedule 2) OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE NOTICE FOR THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT FUNCTIONING AS THE MPUMALANGA DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT Government Notice 956 in Government Gazette 41090 dated 1 September 2017. Commencement date: 1 September 2017, unless otherwise indicated. By virtue of the powers vested in me in terms of section 7(1) of the Superior Courts Act, 2013 (Act 10 of 2013) I, Dunstan Mlambo, the Judge President of the Gauteng Divisions of the High Court, issue the attached notice in relation to the Gauteng Division of the High Court of South Africa, functioning as the Mpumalanga Division of the High Court of South Africa. (Signed) Dunstan Mlambo Judge President of the Gauteng Divisions of the High Court of South Africa NOTICE 1 OF 2017 FOR THE GAUTENG DIVISION of the HIGH COURT of SOUTH AFRICA Functioning as THE MPUMALANGA DIVISION Prepared by: Page 2 of 4 OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ISSUED BY JUDGE PRESIDENT MLAMBO IN TERMS OF SECTION 7(1) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ACT NO 10 OF 2013 NOTICE 1. The jurisdictional boundaries of the Circuit Courts of the Mpumalanga Division are determined as follows - 1.1 The Mbombela Circuit Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of civil and criminal matters emanating in and from the Magisterial Districts mentioned in PART A of the attached Schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed Magisterial
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
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft Scoping Report Davel to Nerston.Pdf
    Reference: 109578 Environmental Impact Assess- ment: The Proposed Upgrade DEA Ref: 14/12/16/3/3/2/553 Prepared for:Transnet SOC and new Construction related to Ltd the Development of the Revision: 05 Swaziland Rail Link Project, July 2013 From Davel to Nerston in Mpumalanga. Draft Scoping Report Project 109578 File Draft Scoping Report_Davel to border_05.doc Revision 05 Document Control Record Document prepared by: Mrs Candice Dürr Aurecon South Africa (Pty Ltd) 4 Daventry Street Lynnwood Bridge Office Park Lynnwood Manor 0081 T +27 12 427 252 F +27 86 556 0521 E [email protected] W www.aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Environmental Impact Assessment: The Proposed Upgrade And New Construction Related To The Development Of The Swaziland Rail Link Report Title Project, From Davel to Nerston in Mpumalanga. Draft Scoping Report Document ID 109578/DSR_MP/02 Project Number 109578 P:\Projects\109578 EIA Process for Swaziland Rail File Path Link\Environmental\DSR - Mpumalanga Client Transnet SOC Ltd Client Contact +27 11 308 3000 Rev Date Revision Details/Status Prepared by Author Verifier Approver 00 03.06.2013 Draft (Pieter to comment) C .Durr C. Durr Dr P Botha Barend Smit 01 20.06.2013 Draft (PPP add-ins) C. Durr C. Durr Dr P Botha Barend Smit 02 01.07.2013 Draft (Barend to comment) C.
    [Show full text]