Constraints from Lava Flows in Daedalia Planum
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting
Program Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting June 12–14, 2018 • Knoxville, Tennessee Institutional Support Lunar and Planetary Institute Universities Space Research Association Convener Devon Burr Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Science Organizing Committee David Williams, Chair Arizona State University Devon Burr Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Robert Jacobsen Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Bradley Thomson Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Abstracts for this meeting are available via the meeting website at https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/pgm2018/ Abstracts can be cited as Author A. B. and Author C. D. (2018) Title of abstract. In Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting, Abstract #XXXX. LPI Contribution No. 2066, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. Guide to Sessions Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:00 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Introduction and Mercury and Venus Maps 1:00 p.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Mars Maps 5:30 p.m. Strong Hall Poster Area Poster Session: 2018 Planetary Geologic Mappers Meeting Wednesday, June 13, 2018 8:30 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room GIS and Planetary Mapping Techniques and Lunar Maps 1:15 p.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Asteroid, Dwarf Planet, and Outer Planet Satellite Maps Thursday, June 14, 2018 8:30 a.m. Strong Hall Optional Field Trip to Appalachian Mountains Program Tuesday, June 12, 2018 INTRODUCTION AND MERCURY AND VENUS MAPS 9:00 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Chairs: David Williams Devon Burr 9:00 a.m. -
Martian Crater Morphology
ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter. -
Widespread Crater-Related Pitted Materials on Mars: Further Evidence for the Role of Target Volatiles During the Impact Process ⇑ Livio L
Icarus 220 (2012) 348–368 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Widespread crater-related pitted materials on Mars: Further evidence for the role of target volatiles during the impact process ⇑ Livio L. Tornabene a, , Gordon R. Osinski a, Alfred S. McEwen b, Joseph M. Boyce c, Veronica J. Bray b, Christy M. Caudill b, John A. Grant d, Christopher W. Hamilton e, Sarah Mattson b, Peter J. Mouginis-Mark c a University of Western Ontario, Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, Earth Sciences, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7 b University of Arizona, Lunar and Planetary Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA c University of Hawai’i, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, Ma¯noa, HI 96822, USA d Smithsonian Institution, Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA e NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA article info abstract Article history: Recently acquired high-resolution images of martian impact craters provide further evidence for the Received 28 August 2011 interaction between subsurface volatiles and the impact cratering process. A densely pitted crater-related Revised 29 April 2012 unit has been identified in images of 204 craters from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. This sample of Accepted 9 May 2012 craters are nearly equally distributed between the two hemispheres, spanning from 53°Sto62°N latitude. Available online 24 May 2012 They range in diameter from 1 to 150 km, and are found at elevations between À5.5 to +5.2 km relative to the martian datum. The pits are polygonal to quasi-circular depressions that often occur in dense clus- Keywords: ters and range in size from 10 m to as large as 3 km. -
March 21–25, 2016
FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk, -
Observations of the Marker Bed at Gale Crater with Recommendations for Future Exploration by the Curiosity Rover
52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 1484.pdf OBSERVATIONS OF THE MARKER BED AT GALE CRATER WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE EXPLORATION BY THE CURIOSITY ROVER. C. M. Weitz1, J. L. Bishop2, B. J. Thomson3, K. D. Seelos4, K. Lewis5, I. Ettenborough3, and R. E. Arvidson6. 1Planetary Science Institute, 1700 East Fort Lowell, Tuc- son, AZ ([email protected]); 2SETI Institute, Carl Sagan Center, Mountain View, CA; 3Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Univ. Tennessee, Knoxville, TN; 4Planetary Exploration Group, JHU Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD; 5Dept Earth and Planetary Sciences, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; 6Dept Earth and Planetary Sci- ences, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. Introduction: A dark-toned marker bed is ob- pearance across the mound. Most of the sulfates served within the sulfates at Gale crater [1,2]. This above/below the marker bed are stratified, heavily marker bed is characterized by a dark-toned, smooth fractured, and erode into boulder-size blocks, but there surface that appears more indurated and retains more are examples where the sulfates appear massive with craters relative to the sulfate-bearing layers above and limited fracturing and no boulders eroding from the below it. The bed has a distinct physical appearance unit (Fig. 3a). from the sulfates in which it occurs, suggesting a change in the environment or geochemistry for a brief period of time within the depositional sequence that formed the sulfates or post-deposition alteration. In this study, we utilized HiRISE and CTX images to identify and map the occurrence of the marker bed throughout Aeolis Mons. -
Arecibo Radar Imaging of Mars During the 2005 Opposition
Seventh International Conference on Mars 3136.pdf ARECIBO RADAR IMAGING OF MARS DURING THE 2005 OPPOSITION. J. K. Harmon1 and M. C. Nolan1, 1Arecibo Observatory, National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, HC3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612. [email protected], [email protected]. Introduction: Mars has traditionally been a diffi- good enough to allow us to make the first radar polari- cult target for Earth-based radar imaging because of its zation-ratio images of the planet. All of the images are rapid rotation, which not only lowers the echo spectral subject to a north-south mapping ambiguity about the density but also produces an “overspread” condition Doppler equator. However, the image confusion from that precludes mapping with standard delay-Doppler this ambiguity is not as bad as one might expect, for methods. However, some success in Mars imaging has two reasons: (1) The sub-Earth latitude was far enough been achieved over the last two decades using two south (11–19°S) that nearly all of the radar-bright novel radar techniques: (1) X-band synthesis imaging features are north of the Doppler equator and little using a Goldstone-VLA bistatic radar system [1,2,3], affected by ambiguity foldover from weak echoes from and (2) S-band delay-Doppler imaging at Arecibo us- the cratered highlands, and (2) there is enough lever- ing a new “long-code” method to mitigate echo over- age from changing sub-Earth aspect that ambiguity spreading effects [4,5,6]. These first imaging efforts foldover features are easily identified by their smear- showed that the strongest depolarized echoes (an indi- ing. -
Large Impact Crater Histories of Mars: the Effect of Different Model Crater Age Techniques ⇑ Stuart J
Icarus 225 (2013) 173–184 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Large impact crater histories of Mars: The effect of different model crater age techniques ⇑ Stuart J. Robbins a, , Brian M. Hynek a,b, Robert J. Lillis c, William F. Bottke d a Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, 3665 Discovery Drive, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States b Department of Geological Sciences, 3665 Discovery Drive, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States c UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States d Southwest Research Institute and NASA Lunar Science Institute, 1050 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, United States article info abstract Article history: Impact events that produce large craters primarily occurred early in the Solar System’s history because Received 25 June 2012 the largest bolides were remnants from planet ary formation .Determi ning when large impacts occurred Revised 6 February 2013 on a planetary surface such as Mars can yield clues to the flux of material in the early inner Solar System Accepted 25 March 2013 which, in turn, can constrain other planet ary processes such as the timing and magnitude of resur facing Available online 3 April 2013 and the history of the martian core dynamo. We have used a large, global planetary databas ein conjunc- tion with geomorpholog icmapping to identify craters superposed on the rims of 78 larger craters with Keywords: diameters D P 150 km on Mars, 78% of which have not been previously dated in this manner. -
Mgs Moc the First Year: Sedimentary Materials and Relationships
Lunar and Planetary Science XXX 1029.pdf MGS MOC THE FIRST YEAR: SEDIMENTARY MATERIALS AND RELATIONSHIPS. K. S. Edgett and M. C. Malin, Malin Space Science Systems, P.O. Box 910148, San Diego, CA 92191-0148, U.S.A. ([email protected], [email protected]). Introduction: During its first year of operation Bright and Dark Bedforms: In terms of relative (Sept. 1997 to Sept. 1998), the Mars Global Surveyor albedo, there are three classes of martian bedforms: (MGS) Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) obtained high those with albedos that are darker, brighter, or indis- resolution images (2–20 m/pixel) that provide new tinguishable from their surroundings. Bright bedforms information about sedimentary material on Mars. This tend to be superposed on dark surfaces and are most paper describes sedimentology results, other results are common in Sinus Sabaeus. Other bright bedforms oc- presented in a companion paper [1]. cur on intermediate-albedo surfaces such as Isidis Dark Mantles: Contrary to pre-MGS assumptions, Planitia and around the Granicus Valles. Two exam- the large, persistent, low albedo (<0.1) regions Sinus ples have been found where low-albedo dunes have Meridiani, Sinus Sabaeus, and Syrtis Major, are blown over and partly obscure older, bright bed- largely covered by smooth-surfaced mantles, rather than forms—these occur on crater floors in west Arabia bedforms of sand. These regions contrast with other Terra, and might imply that these particular bright low albedo surfaces—such as the dark collar around the bedforms are indurated or composed of coarse grains north polar cap—which are dune fields. -
The Prophecy That Is Shaping History
The Prophecy That Is Shaping History: New Research on Ezekiel’s Vision of the End Jon Mark Ruthven, PhD Ihab Griess, PhD Xulon Press 11350 Random Hills Drive #800 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Copyright Jon Mark Ruthven © 2003 In memoriam Pamela Jessie Ruthven PhD, LCSW 26 March 1952 – 9 April 2001 Wife, mother, and faithful friend i Preface Great events in history often gather momentum and power long before they are recognized by the experts and commentators on world affairs. Easily one of the most neglected but powerfully galvanizing forces shaping history in the world today is the prophecy of Gog and Magog from the 38th and 39th chapters of the book of Ezekiel. This prophecy from the Jewish-Christian Bible has molded geo-politics, not only with- in the United States and the West but also, to an amazing degree, in the Muslim world as well. It seems that, millennia ago, Ezekiel’s vision actually named the nation which millions today believe plays the major role in this prophecy: the nation of Russia. Many modern scholars have dismissed Ezekiel’s Gog and Magog prophecy as a mystical apocalypse written to vindicate the ancient claims of a minor country’s deity. The very notion of such a prediction—that semi-mythical and unrelated nations that dwelt on the fringes of Israel’s geographical consciousness 2,500 years ago would, “in the latter days,” suddenly coalesce into a tidal wave of opposition to a newly regathered state of Jews—seems utterly incredible to a modern mentality. Such a scenario, the experts say, belongs only to the fundamentalist “pop religion” of The Late, Great Planet Earth and of TV evangelists. -
Geologic Evolution of Eastern Hellas, Mars: Styles and Timing of Volatile- Driven Activity
Second Conference on Early Mars (2004) 8027.pdf GEOLOGIC EVOLUTION OF EASTERN HELLAS, MARS: STYLES AND TIMING OF VOLATILE- DRIVEN ACTIVITY. David A. Crown1, Leslie F. Bleamaster III1, and Scott C. Mest2, 1Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Ft. Lowell Rd., Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719, [email protected], 2Geodynamics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771. Introduction. The east rim of the Hellas basin parallel troughs. The Late Noachian and Early and the surrounding highlands comprise a Hesperian Epochs were marked by continued geologically significant region for evaluating volatile modification of older surfaces, volcanism forming the abundance, volatile distribution and cycling, and main structures of Tyrrhena and Hadriaca Paterae potential changes in Martian environmental (subsequently eroded by fluvial processes), and the conditions. This region of the Martian surface emplacement of Hesperia Planum. In the Late exhibits landforms shaped by a diversity of geologic Hesperian Epoch, channeled and smooth varieties of processes and has a well-preserved geologic record, sedimentary plains filled low-lying areas within the with exposures of Noachian, Hesperian, and highlands and were dissected by the extensive Amazonian units, as well as spans a wide range in canyons of Dao, Harmakhis, and Reull Valles, which both latitude and elevation due to the magnitude presumably contributed sediment and volatiles to of Hellas basin. In addition, geologically Hellas Planitia. A complicated sequence of erosional contemporaneous volcanism and volatile-driven and depositional events at the east rim and on the activity in the circum-Hellas highlands provide basin floor may have included lacustrine and glacial important ingredients for creating habitats for activity [20-21]. -
Table 2: Classical Albedo Names from Greek
Gangale & Dudley-Flores Proposed Additions to the Cartographic Database of Mars 48 Table 2: Classical Albedo Names From Greek Feature Name Type Latitude East Longitude Origin Usage Boreosyrtis Canalis 54.68 70 Northern sandbank in Greek. 1888 Schiaparelli, 1895 Lowell, 1901 Antoniadi, 1955 BAA, 1967 IAU. Deuteronilus Canalis 34.68 0 "Second Nile" in Greek. 1888 Schiaparelli, 1895 Lowell, 1901 Antoniadi, 1905 Lowell, 1954 De Vaucouleurs, 1955 BAA, 1957 IAU. Deuteronilus Mensae 45.11 23.92 Second Nile in Greek. Mensae Deuteronilus Colles 41.95 21.7 Second Nile in Greek. Colles Hellas Regio -39.67 70 The indigenous name of Greece. 1888 Schiaparelli, 1895 Lowell, 1901 Antoniadi, 1954 De Vaucouleurs, 1955 BAA, 1957 IAU. Hellas Planitia Planitia -42.43 70.5 The indigenous name of Greece. Hellas Montes Montes -37.63 97.61 The indigenous name of Greece. Nilokeras Canalis 29.71 305 "Horn of the Nile" in Greek. 1888 Schiaparelli, 1895 Lowell, 1901 Antoniadi, 1905 Lowell, 1954 De Vaucouleurs, 1955 BAA, 1957 IAU. Nilokeras Scopulus 31.72 304.15 Horn of the Nile in Greek. Scopulus Nilokeras Fossa Fossa 24.59 302.17 Horn of the Nile in Greek. Nilokeras Mensae 30.48 308.05 Horn of the Nile in Greek. Mensae Nilosyrtis Canalis 41.66 70 "Sandbank of the Nile" in Greek. 1888 Schiaparelli, 1895 Lowell, 1901 Antoniadi, 1905 Lowell, 1954 De Vaucouleurs, 1955 BAA, 1957 IAU. Nilosyrtis Mensae 34.77 68.47 "Sandbank of the Nile" in Greek. Mensae Protonilus Mensae 43.87 48.86 "First (Eastern) part of Nile" in Greek. Mensae Gangale & Dudley-Flores Proposed Additions to the Cartographic Database of Mars 49 Feature Name Type Latitude East Longitude Origin Usage Uranius Patera Patera 26.32 267.2 "Heavenly" in Greek. -
Mer Landing.Qxd
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Mars Exploration Rover Landings Press Kit January 2004 Media Contacts Donald Savage Policy/Program Management 202/358-1547 Headquarters [email protected] Washington, D.C. Guy Webster Mars Exploration Rover Mission 818/354-5011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. David Brand Science Payload 607/255-3651 Cornell University, [email protected] Ithaca, N.Y. Contents General Release …………………………………………………………..................................…… 3 Media Services Information ……………………………………….........................................…..... 5 Quick Facts ………………………………………………………................................……………… 6 Mars at a Glance ……………………………………………………….................................………. 7 Historical Mars Missions ………………………………………………….....................................… 8 Mars: The Water Trail ………………………………………………………………….................…… 9 Where We've Been and Where We're Going …………………………………................ 14 Science Investigations .............................................................................................................. 17 Landing Sites ............................................................................................................................. 23 Mission Overview ……………...………………………………………..............................………. 28 Spacecraft ................................................................................................................................. 38 Program/Project Management …………………………………………….................................…