DOCSLIB.ORG

Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia (Raptors Mou)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia (Raptors Mou) Distribution: General Memorandum of Understanding on the CMS/Raptors/MoS1/ Inf.13.3 Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and 23 Oct 2012 Eurasia (Raptors MoU) Original: English 1ST MEETING OF SIGNATORIES Abu Dhabi, UAE, 9-11 December 2012 UPDATE OF SCIENTIFIC DATA UNDERPINNING THE RAPTORS MOU Background 1. Earlier this year, the Interim Coordinating Unit of the Raptors MoU commissioned BirdLife International to review the Annexes to the Raptors MoU to confirm that the underpinning scientific information remains accurate and up-to-date. The original feasibility study was carried out over 7 years ago. The aim of pubishing the results of this review is to ensure that Signatories are best placed to take informed decisions, both in the development of their National or Regional Strategies, and in the overall implementation of the Raptors MoU. 2. The Update Report includes suggestions for potential changes to the Annexes which will require careful consideration by Signatories. The Interim Coordinating Unit believes that these are issues that a Technical Advisory Group could consider intersessionally, with a view to it preparing a detailed set of Recommendations for presentation at the 2nd Meeting of Signatories. Action requested: The Meeting is invited to: (a) Review and take note of the Update Report. (b) Consider instructing the Technical Advisory Group, if established, to advise if any revisions are required to the Annexes of the Raptors MoU. For reasons of economy, this document is printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. 2012 Update of the scientific data underpinning the UNEP/CMS Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia (Raptors MoU) BirdLife International October 2012 1 2012 Update of the scientific data underpinning the UNEP/CMS Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia (Raptors MoU) October 2012 Prepared by Tris Allinson (Science & Information Management Officer, BirdLife International) Vicky Jones (Global Flyways Officer, BirdLife International) BirdLife International Wellbrook Court Girton Road Cambridge CB3 0NA UNITED KINGDOM T: +44 (0)1223 277 318 F: +44 (0)1223 277 200 E: birdlife @ birdlife.org Reviewed by Ibrahim Alhasani (Flyway Officer, Middle East, BirdLife International) Stuart Butchart (Global Research & Indicators Coordinator, BirdLife International) Lincoln Fishpool (Global IBA Coordinator, BirdLife International) Richard Grimmett (Director of Conservation, BirdLife International) Alison Stattersfield (Head of Science, BirdLife International) Nick P. Williams (Programme Officer Birds of Prey – Raptors, UNEP CMS) Additional contributions provided by Osama Alnouri (RFF Coordinator, Middle East, BirdLife International) Leon Bennun (Director of Science, Policy and Information Management, BirdLife International and CMS Appointed Councillor (Birds) Nicola J. Crockford (International Species Policy Officer, RSPB) George Eshiamwata (Flyway Officer, Africa, BirdLife International) Melanie Heath (Head of Policy, BirdLife International) Marcus Kohler (Senior Programme Manager, Flyways Programme, BirdLife International) Recommended citation: BirdLife International (2012) 2012 Update of the scientific data underpinning the UNEP/CMS Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia (Raptors MoU). Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Cover image: Egyptian Vulture © Vladimir Melnik/Dreamstime.com 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Overview of update task ............................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Geographic coverage .................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Species coverage ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. MoU SPECIES ....................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Potential updates to the species list—Annex 1 of the MoU ......................................................... 6 2.2 Habitats used by African-Eurasian migratory Birds of Prey .......................................................... 8 2.3 Conservation status of African-Eurasian migratory Birds of Prey................................................. 9 2.4 Threats to proposed Category 1 species ..................................................................................... 12 2.5 Conservation measures needed for proposed Category 1 species ............................................ 13 3. MoU SITES ......................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Background to the indicative site list (Table 3 of the MoU) ....................................................... 14 3.2 Potential update to the indicative site list (Table 3 of the MoU) ............................................... 17 3.3 Condition of proposed MoU sites (listed on Annex 3 of report) ................................................ 20 3.4 Threats to sites important for migratory raptors ....................................................................... 22 4. MOU REVIEW .................................................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Possible tasks for consideration by a future Technical Advisory Group ..................................... 24 4.2 Updating and expanding the scientific information ................................................................... 25 References ............................................................................................................................................ 28 Annex 1. African-Eurasian migratory Birds of Prey—update to the MoU Annex 1 .............................. 30 Annex 2. Range States and territories .................................................................................................. 31 Annex 3. Update to Table 3 of the MoU: Important Bird Areas (IBAs) triggered by Annex 1 species . 32 Annex 4. Sites listed on the original MoU Table 3 that no longer qualify for inclusion ....................... 91 Annex 5. Range states and territories that do not currently have any IBAs triggered by Annex 1 species. .................................................................................................................................................. 91 Annex 6. Proposed Annex 1 species within each Range State ............................................................. 91 Annex 7. Country occurrence of proposed Annex 1 species .............................................................. 102 Annex 8a. MoU Annex 1 species that may not be fully migratory ..................................................... 109 Annex 8b. Species not currently listed on Annex 1 of this report for which there is some evidence of migratory behaviour ........................................................................................................................... 109 Annex 8c. Non-European species considered by previous expert review to have an unfavourable conservation status in Asia, the Middle East or Africa ....................................................................... 109 Annex 8d. Globally declining Category 3 species ................................................................................ 109 Annex 9: Threats to proposed Category 1 species globally ................................................................ 110 3 Annex 10. Methodology for calculating the Red List Index (RLI). ....................................................... 111 4 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview of update task BirdLife International was requested by the Interim Coordinating Unit of the UNEP/CMS Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia (Raptors MoU) to provide an update of the scientific information underpinning the MoU for consideration by the Signatories. Seven years have passed since the initial scientific analysis was completed (Tucker 2005) and it was considered important that the Signatories have access to the latest available information to support their work at the 1st Meeting of the Signatories in December 2012 and going forward. This review uses BirdLife International’s data which are held in the IUCN Species Information Service (SIS) and BirdLife’s World Bird Database (WBDB), including detailed information on the world’s avifauna and the sites important for their conservation. These databases are regularly updated and revised through processes coordinated by BirdLife International. The analyses in this review are based upon the updated species and site lists proposed in this report. The data included were accessed from the BirdLife databases between June and October 2012. 1.2 Geographic coverage The Raptors MoU is intended to promote the conservation of migratory ‘Birds of Prey’ in the Range States and territories of Africa and Eurasia. This review follows the geographical area defined in Annex 2 of the MoU, which includes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stored Carbon in the Grassland Habitat of Gorumara National Park, West Bengal, India
    ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, Issue 10, October 2015 Stored Carbon in the Grassland Habitat of Gorumara National Park, West Bengal, India Sumita Ghatak1, Abhijit Mitra2, Prosenjit Pramanick3, Atanu Kumar Raha4 Department of Forest and Environmental Science, Techno India University, Kolkata, India1, 4 Department of Marine Science, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India2 Department of Oceanography, Techno India University, Kolkata, India3 Abstract: The biomass and stored carbon in two dominant grass species (Daddha and Chepti) widely available in the Gorumara National Park was assessed during August, 2015. The average Above Ground Biomass (AGB) followed the order Daddha (15.34 Kg m-2) > Chepti (11.23 Kg m-2) in Sandy soil. In case of Sandy loam soil, the AGB followed a reverse order i.e., Chepti (17.54 Kg m-2) > Daddha (16.72 Kg m-2). The average Below Ground Biomass (BGB) followed the order Daddha (5.05 Kg m-2) > Chepti (2.22 Kg m-2) in sandy soil. In case of Sandy loam soil, the average BGB followed the order Daddha (6.25 Kg m-2) > Chepti (3.46 Kg m-2). The average Above Ground Carbon (AGC) followed the sequence Daddha (7.18 Kg m-2) > Chepti (5.51 Kg m-2) in Sandy soil and Chepti (8.69 Kg m-2) > Daddha (8.04 Kg m-2) in Sandy loam soil. The average Below Ground Carbon (BGC) in Daddha and Chepti were 2.23 Kg m-2 and 1.05 Kg m-2 respectively in Sandy soil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mountains of Crete
    208 THE MOUNTAINS OF CRETE THE MOUNTAINS OF CRETE BY L. H. HURST F he is not already aware of the fact, the visitor to Crete will at once perceive that it is a highly mountainous island. There are three groups whose summits exceed z,ooo m. In the west, the White Mountains rise behind Canea and fall steeply on the south to the Libyan sea. The area contains some twenty such summits and is by far the most important of the three. Mount Ida (in Greek, Psiloriti) rises in the centre of the island. In the east, the upland Lasithi plain is ringed by hills and mountains which reach their highest point in Mount Dikte to the south. With the possible exception of one particular face, the rock­ climber is unlikely to find anything to interest him in Crete. All the summits are easy and can be reached from various directions. But for the elderly mountaineer, whose more active days are behind him but who is still able to walk and to whom untravelled regions have an appeal, Crete may well be the answer. The mountains are best visited at the end of April or in early May, while some snow still remains to give them such beauty as they may claim and add to the interest of the ascents. Only a great enthusiast would wander amongst them in the months of summer when they have been stripped to their bare bones and their grey limestone faces blench and shimmer under a sun that is more African than European.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Indian Rhino in West Bengal for the Year 2019
    Estimation of Indian Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) 2019 West Bengal Estimation of Indian Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis)-2019, West Bengal Estimation of Indian Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis)-2019, West Bengal 1 Published by: Chief Conservator of Forests Wildlife North Directorate of Forests Government of West Bengal SJDA Complex, PO. Danguajhar, Dist. Jalpaiguri-735121 Phone/Fax: 03561 255627, 255193 Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2019 in text Copyright © 2019 in Photo and Design All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holders. Photo credit: Wildlife Wing, West Bengal GIS assistance: Dolon Sarkar Design & Print: CONCEPT, Siliguri email: [email protected] 2 Estimation of Indian Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis)-2019, West Bengal Estimation of Indian Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis)-2019, West Bengal 3 Ravi Kant Sinha, IFS Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Wildlife & Chief Wildlife Warden, Government of West Bengal Foreword A regular census programme is essential for evaluating the success of any conservation programme of an endangered species. This programme must be transparent and holistic, and incorporate any new methods available through ongoing research, addressing an array of parameters related to the survival of the species by using the blend of the best available science and technology. In this current census of rhinos in West Bengal the tried and tested method of “Total Count” has been adopted. Simultaneously, methods of genetic analysis and identifying individual DNA is also being introduced. The whole exercise has been conducted with active participation of NGOs and volunteers to ensure transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Edible Plants of Gorumara National Park, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal
    Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2020). 7(12): 1-5 International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN: 2348-8069 www.ijarbs.com DOI: 10.22192/ijarbs Coden: IJARQG (USA) Volume 7, Issue 12 -2020 Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2020.07.12.001 Wild edible plants of Gorumara National Park, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal Anant Kumar1 and Vinay Ranjan1# 1Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, Howrah-711103, West Bengal E-mail: #[email protected] Abstract Knowledge of wild edible plants is essential to enrich our dietary diversity. These plants can be used to rescue as food at times of disasters, droughts and famines. The floristic composition of the Gorumara National Park (GNP) was studied through extensive field surveys from 2008 to 2012 and enumerated 350 taxa under 260 genera belonging to 90 families of angiosperms. During the study, authors collected information on 50 wild edible plants from the tribals and local people. A list of these plants along with their family, phenology and parts used has been provided. Keywords: Gorumara National Park, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, Wild edible plants. Introduction West Bengal has wide range of wild plant species whose leaves, flowers, and fruits are used as raw or Plants for human consumption accounts for about 5% cooked (Biswas and Paul, 2002; Arunachalam et al., of the total plant species of the world (Asfaw and 2007; Bandyopadhyay and Mukherjee, 2009; Biswas Tadesse, 2001). These plants can come to rescue as et al., 2011; Biswas and Mondal, 2012; Chowdhury food at times of disasters, droughts and famines and Mukherjee, 2012; Banerjee et al., 2013; (Debabrata, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Sınıf İngilizce
    8. Sınıf İngilizce 7. Ünite: Tourism Answer the question according to the brochure below. • Are you interested in nature? • Would you like to take a balloon tour? • What about trying horse riding or paraglading? Then, take a trip to Göreme between August 28-30. Enjoy a two-night stay at a five-star hotel. For more information call: 0 500 123 45 67 1. Which question is NOT answered in the text? A) What do we eat? B) How long is the trip? C) What activities do you offer? D) Where do we stay during the trip? MEB 2019 - 2020 ● Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü 7. Ünite: Tourism Answer the question according to Fiona’s talk. I work in a big city so holidays are important for me. I prefer summer holidays. I love the sea and the beach but historic places attract me most. I have exciting plans for next summer. First, I am going to visit an ancient city because I like walking through old cities and learning about different cultures. Then, I will go to a beautiful hotel by the beach and swim every day. Fiona 2. Where is she going to start her holiday? A) B) C) D) MEB 2019 - 2020 ● Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü 7. Ünite: Tourism Answer the questions 3 and 4 according to the brochure. TRAVEL TO TURKEY BALIKESİR RİZE It’s famous for Mount Ida (Kazdağı), special desserts, Rize is famous for its natural beauties. seafood and local bazaars. You can enjoy swimming Its most important features are: tea gardens, and the beautiful beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Hari River Basin, with Re-Validation of P. Turcomana
    Journal of Applied Biological Sciences 9 (3): 01-05, 2015 ISSN: 1307-1130, E-ISSN: 2146-0108, www.nobel.gen.tr Taxonomic Status of the Genus Paraschistura (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae) in the Hari River Basin, with Re-validation of P. turcomana Hamed MOUSAVI SABET1* Saber VATANDOUST2 Arash JOULADEH ROUDBAR3 Soheil EAGDERI4 1Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmeh Sara, Guilan, Iran 2Department of Fisheries, Islamic Azad University, Babol Branch, Babol, Iran 3Department Fisheries, Sari University of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources, Mazandran, Iran 4Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran *Corresponding author: Received: July 12, 2015 Email: [email protected] Accepted: August 23, 2015 Abstract The genus Paraschistura in the Hari River basin is reviewed, and diagnoses are presented for all the three recognized species. Paraschistura cristata and P. turcmenica are considered valid; and P. turcomana is revalidated. Paraschistura turcomana is a poorly known species from the Kushk River in the Murghab drainage at the border of Afghanistan and Turkmenistan, its validity has been questioned and a synonymy with P. turcmenica has been suggested. In this study, we compare P. turcmenica with the syntypes of P. turcomana. A comparison with the related taxa P. cristata and P. turcmenica reveals that P. turcomana can be separated from them by 7½ branched rays in dorsal fin, scaleless body, elongated and shallow body, shallow caudal peduncle, and colour pattern including obvious dark cross bars. The presence of two additional undescribed species is suggested from the basin. Keywords: Freshwater Fishes, Loach, Afghanistan, Iran, Turkmenistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Displacement and Relocation of Protected Areas: a Synthesis and Analysis of Case Studies
    SPECIAL ARTICLE Displacement and Relocation of Protected Areas: A Synthesis and Analysis of Case Studies Antoine Lasgorceix, Ashish Kothari Relocation of human populations from the protected elocation of human populations from within areas areas results in a host of socio-economic impacts. In notified for wildlife conservation (protected areas or PA India, in many cases, especially relating to tribal R s) has been undertaken in several countries, as a means of trying to reduce pressures on wildlife. It is not the aim communities that have been relatively isolated from the of this essay to dwell on the ecological and social justifi cation for outside world, the displacement is traumatic from both such relocation. Instead, it attempts to describe and analyse the economic and cultural points of view. This paper full range of relocation cases in India in the last few decades, provides brief case studies of displacement (past, discuss the impacts of these displacements from both environ- mental and livelihood perspectives, and offer recommendations ongoing, or proposed) from protected areas, number of on the way to enhance the process by which relocation decisions villages/families displaced, the place where these are taken and implemented.1 villages/families were relocated to, governance of the 1 Background relocation process, and the kind or nature of relocation (voluntary, induced or forced). It finds that not even a 1.1 PAs and Relocation single study shows the ecological costs and benefits of India’s fi rst modern “protected area” was Hailey National Park relocation, comparing what happens at the old site to created in 1936 by the British colonialists, though there were what happens at the rehabilitation site.
    [Show full text]
  • Randonnée Les Gorges Du Tarn Et De La Jonte Les Points Forts
    Randonnée les Gorges du Tarn et de la Jonte Une randonnée qui offre un spectacle fantastique entre les gorges du Tarn et de la Jonte, la verticalité et les étendues des causses. 7 jours - 6 nuits - 6 jours de marche Départ garanti à 1 Séjour itinérant Sans portage Liberté Code voyage : FR2TARN Les points forts • Les hébergements charmants • Les randonnées en balcon • Traces GPS disponibles Avant votre départ, pensez à vérifier la validité de la fiche technique sur notre site web. https://www.labalaguere.com/randonnee_les_gorges_tarn_jonte.html FR2TARN Dernière mise à jour 09/11/2020 1 / 11 L'érosion de la roche calcaire a façonné un paysage au relief fracturé. Paysage de contrastes avec les eaux vives qui se faufilent dans les canyons, les immenses murailles aux couleurs d'ocre et les vastes plateaux des causses réservant bien des surprises... PROGRAMME JOUR 1 Accueil en fin d'après-midi dans le secteur du Rozier. JOUR 2 LE ROZIER / PEYRELEAU / LES VIGNES. Départ de l'étape et randonnée sur le versant ensoleillé de la vallée du Tarn. Découverte du cirque de Saint-Marcellin et des ruines troglodytiques d'Eglazines (présence de mouflons et de vautours). Petite incursion sur le causse Sauveterre avant de descendre vers Les Vignes au bord du Tarn, accueil en demi-pension en hôtel **. Temps de marche : 5 à 6h. Distance : 19km. Dénivelé : + 680m / - 623m. JOUR 3 LES VIGNES - LA MALENE. Montée sur le causse Sauveterre jusqu'au Point Sublime et rejoint ensuite le Cap Barré Protohistorique du Clapas de la Turque. Plus loin, il descend dans les gorges du Tarn par le sentier de la Farine et rejoint le village de la Malène.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reintroduction of Eurasian Griffon Monachus Vultures to France
    Chancellor, R. D. & B.-U. Meyburg eds. 2004 Raptors Worldwide WWGBP/MME A Success Story: The Reintroduction of Eurasian Griffon Gyps fulvus and Black Aegypius monachus Vultures to France Michel Terrasse, François Sarrazin, Jean-Pierre Choisy, Céline Clémente, Sylvain Henriquet, Philippe Lécuyer, Jean Louis Pinna, and Christian Tessier ABSTRACT By the end of the 1960s, the future of vultures in France appeared bleak. Apart from the western half of the Pyrenees, with residual populations of Eurasian Griffon Gyps fulvus and Bearded Vultures Gypaetus barbatus, and Corsica with a few Bearded Vultures, most of France had lost its large vultures including the Black Vulture Aegypius monachus. Within the scope of a national conservation campaign, a process to restore raptor communities began. Concerning vultures, this was completed through reintroduction programmes. After the success of the Griffon Vulture reintroduction, started in 1968 in the Grands Causses of the Massif Central, other programmes followed in the 90s: Black Vultures in the Massif Central and then Griffon Vultures in the Southern Alps. In 2003 a viable population of Griffon Vultures in the Massif Central contained around 110 pairs. The same situation occurred in the Alps with about 50 breeding pairs of Griffon Vultures. Ten years after the beginning of the Black Vulture releases, the free ranging population included 11 breeding pairs. Accurate monitoring during the reintroduction period allowed us to estimate demographic parameters such as survival and breeding rates, evolution of breeding and foraging territories, main threats, movements between reintroduced populations and those from neighbouring countries, acceptance by people and the beneficial part played by vultures in what is called sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS of the RED KITE Milvus Milvus in CROATIA, BASED on TELEMETRY RESEARCH: SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION and NEW BREEDING RECORD
    LARUS Vol. 54, 2019 54 7-22 str. Zagreb 2019 LARUS (2019) 1 tablica, 5 slika Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti Primljeno 20.9.2019. Prihvaćeno na sjednici Razreda za prirodne znanosti HAZU 21.11.2019. Original scientific paper UDK 598.279.2(497.5) Izvorni znanstveni članak DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21857/mjrl3uxnq9 STATUS OF THE RED KITE Milvus milvus IN CROATIA, BASED ON TELEMETRY RESEARCH: SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION AND NEW BREEDING RECORD Status crvene lunje Milvus milvus u Hrvatskoj na temelju satelitskog praćenja: prostorno i vremensko pojavljivanje te ponovno gniježđenje ADRIAN TOMIK1, JOSIP LEDINŠĆAK2, DORA DVORŽAK2, JELENA KRALJ3, IVAN LITERÁK4, HYNEK MATUŠÍK5, STANISLAV VYHNAL4, DAVID HORAL6, RAINER RAAB7, PÉTER SPAKOVSZKY7, JOCHEN STEINDL7 1I. Meštrovića 74, HR-31326 Darda, CROATIA 2Vatroslava Lisinskog 3, HR-31500 Našice, CROATIA 3Institute of Ornithology, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Gundulićeva 24, HR-10000 Zagreb, CROATIA 4 Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackého tř. 1, 61242 Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC 5 68713 Březolupy 324, CZECH REPUBLIC 6 Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Regional Office Brno, Kotlářská 51, 60200 Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC 7 Technisches Büro für Biologie, Quadenstrasse 13, 2232 Deutsch-Wagram, AUSTRIA e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 7 A. Tomik et al. Status of the Red Kite Milvus milvus in Croatia ABSTRACT Until 2018 the Red Kite was considered a regionally extinct breed- ing species in Croatia and a rare winter visitor in Eastern Slavonia.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks in India (State Wise)
    National Parks in India (State Wise) Andaman and Nicobar Islands Rani Jhansi Marine National Park Campbell Bay National Park Galathea National Park Middle Button Island National Park Mount Harriet National Park South Button Island National Park Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park North Button Island National ParkSaddle Peak National Park Andhra Pradesh Papikonda National Park Sri Venkateswara National Park Arunachal Pradesh Mouling National Park Namdapha National Park Assam Dibru-Saikhowa National Park Orang National Park Manas National Park (UNESCO World Heritage Centre) Nameri National Park Kaziranga National Park (Famous for Indian Rhinoceros, UNESCO World Heritage Centre) Bihar Valmiki National Park Chhattisgarh Kanger Ghati National Park Guru Ghasidas (Sanjay) National Park Indravati National Park Goa Mollem National Park Gujarat Marine National Park, Gulf of Kutch Vansda National Park Blackbuck National Park, Velavadar Gir Forest National Park Haryana WWW.BANKINGSHORTCUTS.COM WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/BANKINGSHORTCUTS 1 National Parks in India (State Wise) Kalesar National Park Sultanpur National Park Himachal Pradesh Inderkilla National Park Khirganga National Park Simbalbara National Park Pin Valley National Park Great Himalayan National Park Jammu and Kashmir Salim Ali National Park Dachigam National Park Hemis National Park Kishtwar National Park Jharkhand Hazaribagh National Park Karnataka Rajiv Gandhi (Rameswaram) National Park Nagarhole National Park Kudremukh National Park Bannerghatta National Park (Bannerghatta Biological Park)
    [Show full text]
  • Northern England Raptor Forum
    Northern England Raptor Forum This edition of the Annual Review is dedicated to the memory of Mick Carroll 1947-2015 Founder of the South Ryedale and East Yorkshire Raptor Study Group Annual Review 2014 1 Contents Acknowledgements Inside Front Cover Photograph credits 3 Useful telephone numbers 3 Foreword 4 Chairman‟s Report 5 Secretary‟s Report 8 Geographical coverage 10 NERF 2014 Annual Review 13 Habitat breakdown 13 Species monitoring 14 Persecution 15 Black hole species 16 Summary 17 Combined statistics 18 Species Reports Editor‟s Note 19 Buzzard, Common Buteo buteo 47 Buzzard, Honey Pernis apivorus 20 Goshawk, Northern Accipiter gentilis 40 Harrier, Hen Circus cyaneus 32 Harrier, Montagu‟s Circus pygargus 38 Harrier, Marsh Circus aeruginosus 28 Hobby Falco subbuteo 84 Kestrel, Common Falco tinnunculus 76 Merlin Falco columbarius 80 Osprey Pandion haliaetus 51 Owl, Barn Tyto alba 54 Owl, Eurasian Eagle Bubo bubo 59 Owl, Little Athene noctua 62 Owl, Long-eared Asio otus 69 Owl, Short-eared Asio flammeus 72 Owl, Tawny Strix aluco 65 Peregrine Falco peregrinus 88 Red Kite Milvus milvus 23 Sparrowhawk, Eurasian Accipiter nisus 44 Raven, Common Corvus corax 94 Species Reports from non-NERF members 97 Conference 2014: summary of speaker presentations 101 Obituary: Mick Carroll 105 Appendices 1. Combined NERF monitoring data 109 2. Combined productivity graphs 110 3. Ring recoveries 112 4. List of acronyms 114 NERF Group contacts Inside back cover 2 Photograph credits Honey Buzzard: Garry Marchant Red Kite: Ivan Ellison Marsh Harrier: Ivan Ellison Hen Harrier: Mike Price Montagu‟s Harrier: Ivan Ellison Northern Goshawk: Ivan Ellison Sparrowhawk: Adrian Dancy Buzzard: Ken Smith Osprey: Ivan Ellison Common Kestrel: Adrian Dancy Merlin: Wilf Norman Hobby: Susan H.
    [Show full text]