DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Session

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Session PUBLIC SESSION MINUTES OF ORAL EVIDENCE taken before HIGH SPEED RAIL COMMITTEE On the HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Wednesday, 16 December 2015 (Morning) In Committee Room 5 PRESENT: Mr Robert Syms (Chair) Sir Peter Bottomley Geoffrey Clifton-Brown Mr David Crausby Mr Mark Hendrick _____________ IN ATTENDANCE Mr Timothy Mould QC, Lead Counsel, Department for Transport Mr James Strachan QC, Counsel, Department for Transport Mr Robin Purchas QC, Counsel, UCL WITNESSES Ms Marina Arnold Mr Prabhat Vaze Ms Susan Massey Ms Roxy Wilding Mr Jeremy Lewison Ms Michelle Hannoosh Mr Richard Janko Ms Caroline Schuck Mr Dave Lawrence Mr Anthony Kay Ms Ellin Stein _____________ IN PUBLIC SESSION INDEX Subject Page Marina Arnold Submissions by Ms Arnold 3 Response from Mr Strachan 5 Closing submissions by Ms Arnold 5 Belsize Residents’ Association Submissions by Mr Vaze 6 Submissions by Ms Massey 11 Response from Mr Strachan 12 Closing submissions by Mr Vaze 18 University College London Submissions by Mr Purchas 19 Response from Mr Mould 22 Jeremy Lewison, et al Submissions by Mr Lewison 25 Evidence of Ms Schuck 31 Evidence of Ms Hannoosh 35 Evidence of Mr Janko 37 Response from Mr Strachan 40 Closing submissions by Mr Lewison 48 Adelaide Nature Reserve Association Submissions by Mr Lawrence 50 Response from Mr Strachan 55 Anthony Kay Submissions by Mr Kay 57 Response from Mr Strachan 62 Ellin Stein Submissions by Ms Stein 63 Response from Mr Strachan 69 2 (At 10.00) Marina Arnold 1. CHAIR: Order, order. Welcome to the HS2 Select Committee. We start off with petitions again. 1588, Marina Arnold. Welcome. We’ve got a lot of business to transact today so we’d appreciate if you could try and stick to your 15 minutes, thank you. We’ve got you up on the map as well where you are. 2. MS ARNOLD: Right, hi. So my name is Marina Arnold and basically it seems to me that this whole thing has come to just spoil the remainder of my life. Anyway. So I begin with saying that I fully support everything that’s been said throughout the process regarding ‘we don’t want the pollution, thank you’, ‘we don’t want the noise, thank you’, ‘we don’t want the vibration, thank you’, ‘we don’t want the reduction in our amenities, thank you’, ‘we don’t want the disruption to our lives, thank you’. Please will you do everything you can to minimise it. So that’s the first point. 3. So can we move to the second of my pages, please? Thank you. Right. So most of what I’m going to say is about technology. There’s been huge advances in technology and that’s something that’s ongoing and what I suspect is that during the planned 17 years – however many it actually takes for this project to come to fruition – what’s being done now, what will be achieved, is something that will be out of date by the time it’s available to the public. So that’s the first point I’d like to make. 4. Can you move on to the second picture, please? Right. Also technology-wise, we live in a world where communications are changing. Improvements are being made almost by the day. Meetings are rarely conducted like this with everybody actually present. They’re very much more often conducted by the phone, by computer, whatever. So I do think that there’s a question of how many people, and who those people are, who are actually going to need this railway once it is up and running in 20 years’ time when all those new advances, etc. have been made. 5. SIR PETER BOTTOMLEY: During the development of the internet and mobile phones and all the rest, rail use has gone up by 40%. 6. MS ARNOLD: Sorry? 7. SIR PETER BOTTOMLEY: During the decade-and-a-half of the development of 3 the internet and mobile phone and all the rest and video conferencing, use of the railways has gone up by 40%. 8. MS ARNOLD: And during that time what percentage has rail-using population, you know, the possibility, increased? And what percentage of increase might be due to general encouragement that we use public transport rather than private transport? 9. SIR PETER BOTTOMLEY: It’s a mixture of all kinds of things: population increase, greater prosperity, incomes go up and people travel more. I don’t want to delay your presentation but I think that you should get off this point onto how you’re affected by the railway. 10. MS ARNOLD: Sure, but point is that while other things may be increasing rail use, also many business meetings are held in a different manner than they used to be. 11. Can we move on to the next picture, please? So this really is about the way we’ve moved forward on chemicals in our world and the way we look at them. Currently, lung disease in response to air pollution and so on is moving up in the list of top killers and it’s predicted by 2020 it’ll be the number 2 top killer. So we ought to be looking at pollution in a slightly different way. In view of this, I think we need to re-evaluate the benefits of future users versus the detriment to existing inhabitants and other users of the areas: people who work, people who play in the area of the decided railway. 12. And we ought to consider where the onus of responsibility lies for minimising the detriment to all those people. I think we need to consider a new way of looking at the standards and the duty of care. Currently we have a system whereby whoever’s building, constructing, digging, tunnelling, whatever says ‘we’ll try our best’ followed by ‘whoops, that was unfortunate’ and then anybody who breathes whatever it is or when the level of pollution rises people with breathing problems are advised to stay indoors. And I wonder if this means that we’re going to be prisoners in our homes for the duration. One of the things that some people have asked is that double glazing be installed where it doesn’t exist. And my personal view is that double glazing might be very nice and it might keep out some of the noise and some of the dust but I’d still quite like to be able to go out and take a walk, do my shopping in real life, etc. 13. So in this case I think that the onus should be on HS2 to ensure that there aren’t 4 any failures rather than theoretically making amends afterwards which means that whatever failures there are effectively the people pay for it; the people breathe in, the people lose their lung capacity, the people lose their lives for the sake of this railway. If the onus were on HS2 rather than them building in to their budget an amount of money to pay for ‘oh dear, whoops, we’ve made a mistake’. For example, they could be working on sealed containers to take the spoil instead of heaping it on a truck which they close but there’s dust everywhere and the dust falls and re-falls and everybody breathes it in, etc. 14. So that’s basically what I wanted to say. 15. CHAIR: Thank you. Do you want to pick up on any of those comments, Mr Strachan? 16. MR STRACHAN QC (DfT): I just refer the Committee back to our overall mitigation measures. I showed you P1313(5) on the screen a moment ago just to identify the location of the petitioner. The petitioner’s just off Adelaide Road. And you’ll see the yellow areas are the parts of the scheme that have been deleted in consequence of the HS2 / HS1 link being withdrawn from the Bill. Other than that, the line is in tunnel as it passes close to the petitioner’s property. 17. CHAIR: Okay. 18. MS ARNOLD: It is, but there will be a considerable amount of traffic carrying spoil going by plus, although that’s where I live, it’s not where I spend 24 hours of a day. I like to get out and about, spend my days busily doing things. And so to say that that bit there is by where the tunnel is underground, even if I simply go to my library at the other end of Adelaide Road, it means passing the vent where apparently there won’t be venting all the time but there will be venting whenever there’s a fire; which we all know from the King’s Cross disaster is not every few years – it’s perhaps every few days. It’s very frequently that there are small fires that need to be vented. 19. SIR PETER BOTTOMLEY: I think that’s your concluding remark, thank you. 20. MS ARNOLD: Sorry? 21. CHAIR: Thank you very much for your contribution today. 5 22. MS ARNOLD: Thank you. Belsize Residents’ Association 23. CHAIR: Are your people here? No? In that case 946, the Belsize Residents’ Association, Prabhat Vaze. It’s not taken in any order; we’ve taken the order that we want. We won’t be too long. Thank you very much. You said you wanted 10 or 15 minutes so that’s why we’ve called you a little bit earlier, because we’re waiting for some other people to come through, we can deal with University College London.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Planning Guidance
    Camden Planning Guidance: Biodiversity March 2018 Camden Planning Guidance: Biodiversity Page 1. Introduction 3 What does this guidance cover? 2. When does this guidance apply? 4 to 5 What are protected or designated sites? What are protected species? What re priority habitats and species? 3. How will the Council assess biodiversity in a proposed 6 to 7 development? Five-point mitigation 4. Preparation of assessment, surveys and plans 9 to 15 Pre-planning & design stage o Habitat assessments o Species surveys Who should carry out the ecological survey? The Planning application stage Habitat provision, enhancement, creation and restoration The construction planning stage Post-construction & post-completion Tables Table A: Five-point mitigation hierarchy 7 Boxes Box 1: Further information about carrying out biodiversity surveys 11 Appendices Appendix 1: Key documents, policies and legislation 16 Appendix 2: Examples of habitat creation and restoration for mitigation and enhancement 17 to 20 Appendix 3a: Local requirements for designated sites and priority habitats: triggers for when survey and assessment is required. 21 Appendix 3b: Local requirement for Protected Species: triggers for when survey and assessment is required. 22 Appendix 3c: Animal species survey timings Appendix 4: Exceptions for when an ecological survey may not be 23 required Appendix 5: Camden sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) 25 to 68 2 Camden Planning Guidance : Biodiversity KEY MESSAGES: A biologically diverse natural environment has an important role in economic prosperity, health and wellbeing of Camden residents, workers and visitors Councils have a statutory duty to have regard to the purpose of conserving biodiversity, particularly where there are protected species and habitats Biodiversity may be a material consideration whether or not the site or any features (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Euston Express - Petition
    C221-MMD-CV-REP-010-200019 |P02 | 06th May 2015 Euston Express - Petition Revision Date Issued for/Revision details Revised by P01 22/01/2015 Initial issue I Grace P02 06/05/2015 HS2 comments included I Grace Name Data MDL Ref B320 FOI / EIR HS2 to advise Document type Report Directorate London West Midlands WBS HS2 to advise Keywords Report, Template Authors ian.grace-mm Owner Mike Prosser Review Directorate HS2 to advise Employer’s Lead Reviewer HS2 to advise Authorised for use HS2 to advise INTERNAL London West Midlands Euston Express - Petition Contents Page number Executive summary ...................................................................................................... 1 1 Abbreviations and descriptions .............................................................................. 4 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 HS2 scheme ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Euston Tunnels ........................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Petition to the Hybrid Bill scheme .......................................................................... 5 3 Petition Proposals ................................................................................................. 5 4 Operational Review ............................................................................................... 8 4.1 Overview ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Green Space: Branch Hill
    Local Green Space: Branch Hill The area proposed as the Branch Hill Local Green Space (LGS) is on the western slopes of Hampstead. It consists of the area of the Branch Hill Grade I Borough level Site of Importance for Nature (SINC) CaB104 and two additional areas. Branch Hill SINC consists of several individual blocks of woodland, interposed with small areas of open grassland, allotments, gardens around a local authority housing estate and private gardens. Geologically the LGS lies on Bagshot Sands and the spring line between the Bagshot Sands and the Claygate Beds. The northern part is a valley formed from the original stream flowing from the site of Branch Hill Pond (a spring near the junction of Branch Hill and West Heath Road, but now dried up most of the year since 1900). Its course, now underground and mainly but not all in pipes, is west south west before it turns south to join the Canon Stream at the western end of Redington Gardens and down Heath Drive to cross Finchley Road. Another arises from springs in Oak Wood, separated from the eastern branch of the Westbourne that arises from the Whitestone area and above Admiral's Walk by a higher ridge. The Branch Hill area streams flow into the more western river Kylburne that eventually runs into the eastern Westbourne and thence to the Thames. Special Policy Area: Area of Special Character: Hampstead & Highgate Ridge. Grade 1 Borough SINC. Other LA designation: Public Open Space (Small Local), nos 145, 146, 147, 148, 269 in Camden's Schedule of Open Spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Draft Statement
    P H A S E ON E DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Community Forum Area Report 3 | Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Community Forum Area Report 3 | Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2nd Floor, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk © Crown copyright, 2013, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. To order further copies contact: DfT Publications Tel: 0300 123 1102 Web: www.dft.gov.uk/orderingpublications Product code: ES/06 Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre Contents Contents Structure of the HS2 draft Environmental Statement 5 Part A: Introduction 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Introduction to HS2 7 1.2 Purpose of this report 7 Part B: Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) – overview of the area and description of the Proposed Scheme 2 Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) 11 2.1 Overview of the
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel Oak Regeneration Consultation: Independent Analysis of Responses
    INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS Subject: Public Consultation on Regeneration of Gospel Oak Prepared for: Richard Crutchley, Camden Council Prepared by: Matthew Scott & Rory Miller, TONIC Date: 18/05/16 Version: FINAL 2 Gospel Oak Regeneration Consultation: Independent Analysis of Responses Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 8 2. Who Responded to the Consultation (Respondent Demographics) ........................... 13 3. Analysis of Consultation Responses .......................................................................... 20 Q1. Priorities............................................................................................................................................................23 Q1(a) Can you tell us which 3 you think are the most important? ..............................................................23 Q1(b) Do you think there are other priorities not listed above? .................................................................. 24 Q2. Invest in Housing............................................................................................................................................ 28 Q2(a) Can you tell us which 3 sites you think are most appropriate for new development? .................. 28 Q2(b) Can you think of any other sites that are suitable for new housing?.............................................. 29 Q2(c) Would you support the Council working in partnership with a developer or
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL London Zoo (6,820 Steps)
    HIT THE STREETS AND DISCOVER THESE LOCAL HIGHLIGHTS Key: Culture & interests Gardens & parks Art Market Fitness ZSL London Zoo (6,820 steps) London Zoo is the world’s oldest scientific zoo and was originally intended to be used as a collection for scientific study. In 1832 the animals of the Tower of London menagerie were transferred to the zoo’s collection. www.zsl.org/zsl-london-zoo Culture & interests Fitness level - Any Walking type - Medium Camden Town Average length of time spent - 120mins £29.75 Average distance - 3.4 miles London NW1 4RY Steps achieved - 6,820 Monday to Sunday 10am - 5.30pm Rain safe 0344 225 1826 Pet friendly Signup: No, just show up Equipment needed: No Regent’s Park (3,410 steps) Regent’s Park (officially The Regent’s Park) is one of the Royal Parks of London. It lies within north-west London, partly in the City of Westminster and partly in the London Borough of Camden. It contains Regent’s University London and the London Zoo. www.royalparks.org.uk Gardens & parks Fitness level - Any Walking type - Medium Regent’s Park Average length of time spent - 60mins Free Average distance - 1.7 miles Chester Road, London NW1 4NR Steps achieved - 3,410 Times vary Rain safe 020 7637 3095 Pet friendly Signup: No, just show up Equipment needed: No Sherlock Holmes Museum (3,100 steps) The Sherlock Holmes Museum is a privately run museum dedicated to the famous fictional detective Sherlock Holmes. It is situated at 221B Baker Street, by permission of the City of Westminster, although it actually sits between numbers 237 and 241.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’S Future Consultation Summary Report
    dialoguebydesign making consultation work High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Consultation Summary Report November 2011 A report to HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport Prepared by Dialogue by Design dialoguebydesign making consultation work High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Consultation Summary Report November 2011 A report to HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport Prepared by Dialogue by Design Email: [email protected] Website: www.dialoguebydesign.net The information or guidance in this document (including third party information, products and services), is provided by the Department for Transport on an 'as is' basis, without any representation or endorsement made and without warranty of any kind whether express or implied. The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.dft.gov.uk General email enquiries [email protected] Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2011, except where otherwise stated Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Open House™ London
    Publication design: www.badrockdesign.co.uk design: Publication Open Open House™ — City London 2015 Open House™ London Revealing great architecture for free 19–20 September Your essential guide to the capital’s greatest architecture festival Culture Crawl Come with us as we head out into the night, discovering cultural, architectural Friday 18 September 2015 and artistic delights in London, whilst raising as much as we can for Maggie’s to support people with cancer and their family and friends. www.maggiescentres.org/culturecrawl In partnership with Sponsored by Maggie Keswick Jencks Cancer Caring Centres Trust (Maggie’s) is a registered charity, no.SC024414 this is civil engineering transport flood risk management • St Pancras • Thames Barrier International (pictured) (pictured) • King George V Crossrail • Pumping Station • London Overground (East London Line) See Camden section See Greenwich section structures water/ waste water • Queen Elizabeth • Old Ford Water Olympic Park Recycling Plant (Velodrome pictured) (pictured) • Coca-Cola London Eye • Walthamstow Wetlands See Newham section See Newham section waste energy Water Recycling Centre – ©Thames Old Ford - © ODA Velodrome The Culture Crawl • Southwark • Bunhill Heat & Integrated Waste Power Energy Centre Come with us as we head out into the night, discovering cultural, architectural Friday 18 September 2015 Management (pictured) and artistic delights in London, whilst raising as much as we can for Maggie’s www.maggiescentres.org/culturecrawl Facility (pictured) • The Crystal to support people with cancer and their family and friends. • Abbey Mills Pumping Station In partnership with Sponsored by See Southwark section See Islington section Bunhill Heat and Energy – ©Islington Council IWMF – ©Veolia Southwark International – ©OAG Pancras St.
    [Show full text]
  • Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) | CFA3 | Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden)
    LONDON-WEST MIDLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MIDLANDS LONDON-WEST | Vol 2 Vol LONDON- | Community Forum Area report Area Forum Community WEST MIDLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Volume 2 | Community Forum Area report CFA3 | Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) | CFA3 | Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) November 2013 VOL VOL VOL ES 3.2.1.3 2 2 2 London- WEST MIDLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Volume 2 | Community Forum Area report CFA3 | Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) November 2013 ES 3.2.1.3 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd. Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre. CFA Report – Primrose Hill to Kilburn
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioner Ref. No. Comments List Updated 3/01/2016 a + M Hire Ltd
    Petitioner Ref. No. Comments List updated 3/01/2016 A + M Hire Ltd AP2:125 Abbeyfield Great Missenden and District Society Ltd 0268 Heard 21/09/2015, with 0254, 0255, video transcript 0256, 0257, 0258, 0259, 0260, 0261, 0762, 0763, 0764, 0765, 0766, 0767, 0768, 0769, 0770, 0771, 1162 and 1430. AP4:158 Locus challenged. Abbeyland Properties Limited, Birmingham AP4:160 Accor UK Economy Hotels Ltd and Accor UK Business & 0458 Hearing scheduled 17/12/2015, but Leisure Hotels Ltd was not heard. James Norman Adam and Priscilla Ann Adam 0889 Heard 17/09/2015 (morning), with video transcript 0873, 0875, 0876, 0877, 0879, 0880, 0881, 0882, 0883, 0887, 0888, 0890, 0891, 0892, 0893, 0894, 0895 and 0898. Rosanne Maureen Airth Adam 0085 Heard 7/09/2015, with 0014, 0015, video transcript 0017, 0019, 0020, 0021, 0276, 0582 and 1721. Mr Bretton Adrian Frazer Adams 0988 Hearing scheduled 7/01/2015, but was not heard. Brian Adams and Angela Adams 0726 Heard 30/06/2015 (morning), with video transcript 0714, 0719, 0727 and 1457. Brian Adams and other residents of Breakspear Road AP4:196 South, Ickenham Rowan Caroline Adams and others 1633 Heard 27/01/2015 (morning). video transcript Jeffrey Patrick Addison and other residents of Hale Road 0012 Listed as not appearing but associated list and Hazeldean, Wendover with 0106 and 1512. Adelaide Nature Reserve Association 1253 Heard 16/12/2015 (morning). video transcript William Adjei and Cassandra Mercy (Botwe) Adjei 0932 Hearing scheduled 10/12/2015, but video transcript was not present when called. Stephen Francis Adkins and Ross Stanley Clifford Adkins 0600 Hearing scheduled 10/02/2015, but it video transcript was stated in evidence that this petition had been withdrawn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adelaide LNR Management Plan
    ADELAIDE LOCAL NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012-2017 Prepared by: D R Lawrence & T R Root Nature for the Community January 2012 INDEX Section Title Page 0 Revisions 3 1 Introduction 4 2 Site name 4 3 Location 4 4 Local planning authority 4 5 Management 4 5.1 Responsibilities 4 5.2 Constraints 5 5.3 Relevant legislation 5 5.3.1 International obligations & commitments 5 5.3.2 European obligations & commitments 6 5.3.3 National legislation 6 5.4 Relevant planning policies 7 5.4.1 LB Camden planning policy 7 5.4.2 GLA London Plan (2011) 8 6 Conservation status 9 7 Nature of legal interest 9 8 Byelaws 9 9 Community 10 9.1 Access 10 9.2 Community involvement 10 9.2.1 Adelaide Local Nature Reserve Association 10 9.2.2 Opportunities to participate in conservation work 10 9.2.3 Nature theme activities for the community 11 9.2.4 Educational activities - informal 11 9.2.5 Educational activities - formal 11 9.2.6 Research activities 11 10 Site Description 11 10.1 General description 11 10.2 Physical description 12 10.2.1 Geology & soils 12 10.2.2 Climate/microclimate 13 10.2.3 Topography 13 Adelaide Local Nature Reserve Management Plan – 2012-2017 Page 1 10.3 Biological description 13 10.3.1 Flora habitats 13 10.3.2 Fauna 15 10.3.3 Other 15 10.4 Evaluation 16 11 Site objectives 17 11.1 Site policy 17 11.2 Site vision 17 11.3 SWOT analysis 17 11.4 Listing of objectives 17 11.5 Relationship to Camden Biodiversity Action Plan 20 12 Main management operations 20 12.1 List of operations 20 12.1.1 Maintenance tasks 20 12.1.2 Development tasks 25 12.2
    [Show full text]
  • Journal-Index-13-July-2017.Pdf
    Richmond History JOURNAL OF THE RICHMOND LOCAL HISTORY SOCIETY Numbers 1–38: Contents, Author Index and Subject Index This listing combines, and makes available online, two publications previously available in print form – Journal Numbers 1 to X: Contents and Index, republished with corrections in October 2006, and Journal Numbers XI to XXV: Contents and Index, published in November 2004. This combined version has been extended to cover all issues of Richmond History up to No. 38 (2017) and it now also includes an author index. Journal numbers are in Arabic numerals and are shown in bold. Although we have taken care to check the accuracy of the index we are are aware that there may be some inaccuracies, inconsistencies or omissions. We would welcome any corrections or additions – please email them to [email protected] List of Contents There were two issues in 1981, Richmond History's first year of publication. Since then it has been published annually. No. 1: 1981 The Richmond ‘Riverside Lands’ in the 17th Century James Green Vincent Van Gogh in Richmond and Petersham Stephen Pasmore The development of the top of Richmond Hill John Cloake Hesba Stretton (1832–1911), Novelist of Ham Common Silvia Greenwood Richmond Schools in the 18th and 19th centuries Bernard J. Bull No. 2: 1981 The Hoflands at Richmond Phyllis Bell The existing remains of Richmond Palace John Cloake The eccentric Vicar of Kew, the Revd Caleb Colton, 1780–1832 G. E. Cassidy Miscellania: (a) John Evelyn in 1678 (b) Wordsworth’s The Choir of Richmond Hill, 1820 Augustin Heckel and Richmond Hill Stephen Pasmore The topography of Heckel’s ‘View of Richmond Hill Highgate, 1744’ John Cloake Richmond in the 17th century – the Friars area James Green No.
    [Show full text]