DOCSLIB.ORG

Pryor Mountain Draft Travel Management Plan Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pryor Mountain Draft Travel Management Plan Environmental BLM U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Office/Montana Field Billings Pryor Mountain Travel Management Area Draft Travel Management Plan Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-MT-C010-2019-0029-EA October 2019 Prepared by: U.S. Bureau of Land Management Billings Field Office 5001 Southgate Drive Billings, MT 59101 Phone: 406-896-5013 Fax: 406-896-5281 It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. DOI-BLM-MT-C010-2019-0029-EA Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Decision to be Made ........................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Conformance with Land Use Plan ................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, Policies, and Other NEPA Documents ................ 1-2 1.6 Public Involvement, Consultation, and Coordination ...................................................... 1-2 1.7 Resource Issues Identified for Analysis ........................................................................... 1-3 1.8 Resource Issues Considered but Eliminated from Further Analysis ................................ 1-4 1.9 Resource Issues Carried Forward for Further Analysis ................................................... 1-4 2.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Route Designations .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Consideration .............................. 2-3 2.3.1 Revised Statute 2477 ........................................................................................ 2-3 2.4 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 Proposed Action (Alternative D) ..................................................................................... 2-6 2.5.1 Minor Realignments ......................................................................................... 2-8 2.5.2 Route Closures ................................................................................................. 2-8 2.5.3 Authorizations .................................................................................................. 2-9 2.5.4 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... 2-9 2.5.5 Future Improvements ..................................................................................... 2-10 2.6 Summary Comparison of Alternatives ........................................................................... 2-10 3.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ........................................................... 3-1 3.1 Soils ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 3-5 3.2 Wildlife (Bighorn Sheep and Greater Sage-Grouse) ....................................................... 3-8 3.2.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 3-8 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 3-9 3.3 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................... 3-11 3.3.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-11 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................ 3-14 3.4 Areas with Special Designations ................................................................................... 3-16 3.4.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-16 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................ 3-18 3.5 Transportation and Access ............................................................................................. 3-20 3.5.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-20 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................ 3-21 Draft Pryor Mountain TMA Environmental Assessment October 2019 i 3.6 Recreation and Visitor Services ..................................................................................... 3-22 3.6.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-22 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................ 3-23 3.7 Wilderness Characteristics ............................................................................................. 3-24 3.7.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-24 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................ 3-27 3.8 Invasive, Non-native Species ......................................................................................... 3-29 3.8.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................... 3-29 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................ 3-29 4.0 Cumulative Effects Analysis ......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Cumulative Projects ......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Soils ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Wildlife (Bighorn Sheep and Greater Sage-Grouse) ....................................................... 4-1 4.4 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................... 4-2 4.5 Transportation and Access ............................................................................................... 4-2 4.6 Recreation and Visitor Services ....................................................................................... 4-2 4.7 Invasive, Non-native Species ........................................................................................... 4-2 5.0 List of Preparers ............................................................................................................................ 5-1 Draft Pryor Mountain TMA Environmental Assessment October 2019 ii List of Tables Table 1-1. Key Issues and Indicators Developed for the Proposed Action ........................................... 1-5 Table 1-2. Resources Considered but Eliminated from Analysis .......................................................... 1-7 Table 1-3. Resources Carried Forward for Analysis ............................................................................. 1-9 Table 2-1. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Consideration.................................. 2-3 Table 2-2. Miles and Percentages of Route Designations under the No Action Alternative ................. 2-4 Table 2-3. Miles and Percentages of Route Designations under Proposed Action ............................... 2-8 Table 2-4. Resource Issues and Indicators under the No Action and Proposed Action Alternatives . 2-10 Table 3-1. Water and Wild Erosion Potential on BLM-Administered Land within the TMA .............. 3-5 Table 3-2. Route Miles through Areas of High and Moderate Wind Erosion Potential – No Action ... 3-6 Table 3-3. Route Miles through Areas of High and Moderate Water Erosion Potential – No Action 3-6 Table 3-4. Route Miles through Areas of High and Moderate Wind Erosion Potential – Proposed Action .................................................................................................................................. 3-7 Table 3-5. Route Miles through Areas of High and Moderate Water Erosion Potential – Proposed Action .................................................................................................................................. 3-7 Table 3-6. Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Habitat within the TMA .................................................. 3-8 Table 3-7. Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat within the TMA ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mineral Resource Assessment of the Custer National Forest in The
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral Resource Assessment of the Custer National Forest in the Pryor Mountains, Carbon County, South-Central Montana by Bradley S. Van Gosen1 , Anna B. Wilson1 , and Jane M. Hammarstrom2, with a section on GEOPHYSICS by Dolores M. Kulik1 Open-File Report 96-256 1996 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................ 2 Geology of the Pryor Mountains ................................... 7 Regional and local structural setting ............................. 7 Stratigraphy .......................................... 11 Uranium-vanadium deposits of the Pryor Mountains ...................... 13 Mining history ......................................... 13 Geology of the host collapse structures .......................... 17 Mineral deposits and associated alteration ........................ 21 Size, grade, and distribution of the deposits ....................... 26 Origin of the deposits .................................... 26 Exploration criteria and previous reconnaissance studies ................ 29 Geophysics by Dolores M. Kulik
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Ecology of Cougars in the Pryor Mountains of Wyoming and Montana
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2014 Foraging Ecology of Cougars in the Pryor Mountains of Wyoming and Montana Linsey Blake Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Blake, Linsey, "Foraging Ecology of Cougars in the Pryor Mountains of Wyoming and Montana" (2014). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 3292. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3292 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORAGING ECOLOGY OF COUGARS IN THE PRYOR MOUNTAINS OF WYOMING AND MONTANA by Linsey W. Blake A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Wildlife Biology Approved: _________________ __________________ Eric M. Gese Michael L. Wolfe Major Professor Committee Member __________________ __________________ Toni K. Ruth Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2014 ii Copyright © Linsey W. Blake 2014 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Foraging Ecology of Cougars in the Pryor Mountains of Wyoming and Montana by Linsey W. Blake, Master of Science Utah State University, 2014 Major Professor: Eric M. Gese Department: Wildland Resources Cougars (Puma concolor) are elusive top-level predators and their predation patterns, particularly upon sensitive species, can be a source of concern to wildlife managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary and Late Tertiary of Montana: Climate, Glaciation, Stratigraphy, and Vertebrate Fossils
    QUATERNARY AND LATE TERTIARY OF MONTANA: CLIMATE, GLACIATION, STRATIGRAPHY, AND VERTEBRATE FOSSILS Larry N. Smith,1 Christopher L. Hill,2 and Jon Reiten3 1Department of Geological Engineering, Montana Tech, Butte, Montana 2Department of Geosciences and Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Idaho 3Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Billings, Montana 1. INTRODUCTION by incision on timescales of <10 ka to ~2 Ma. Much of the response can be associated with Quaternary cli- The landscape of Montana displays the Quaternary mate changes, whereas tectonic tilting and uplift may record of multiple glaciations in the mountainous areas, be locally signifi cant. incursion of two continental ice sheets from the north and northeast, and stream incision in both the glaciated The landscape of Montana is a result of mountain and unglaciated terrain. Both mountain and continental and continental glaciation, fl uvial incision and sta- glaciers covered about one-third of the State during the bility, and hillslope retreat. The Quaternary geologic last glaciation, between about 21 ka* and 14 ka. Ages of history, deposits, and landforms of Montana were glacial advances into the State during the last glaciation dominated by glaciation in the mountains of western are sparse, but suggest that the continental glacier in and central Montana and across the northern part of the eastern part of the State may have advanced earlier the central and eastern Plains (fi gs. 1, 2). Fundamental and retreated later than in western Montana.* The pre- to the landscape were the valley glaciers and ice caps last glacial Quaternary stratigraphy of the intermontane in the western mountains and Yellowstone, and the valleys is less well known.
    [Show full text]
  • Laramide Basement Deformation in the Northern Gallatin Range And
    Laramide basement deformation in the northern Gallatin Range and southern Bridger Range, southwest Montana by Erick WB Miller A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences Montana State University © Copyright by Erick WB Miller (1987) Abstract: The mechanical response of Archean "basement" rocks in the cores of Laramide uplifts has received experimental attention, but there have been relatively few field studies documenting Laramide basement behavior. The purpose of this study is to field test existing theoretical basement strain models by documenting the geometry and kinematics of deformation in areas of good exposures. Field studies along well exposed Squaw Creek fault and Canyon Mountain anticline, Gallatin Range, and three anticlines of the southern Bridget Range, southwest Montana, were made by comparing foliations, mesoscopic faults, and slickensides found in basement rocks to Laramide features found in the overlying Cambrian strata. The results show that in regions where the angle of discordance between the base of the Cambrian and Archean metamorphic foliation surfaces was low (Bridget Range anticlines and Canyon Mountain anticline), the basement deformed by oblique flexural-slip on preexisting foliation surfaces. Passive-slip was important in regions where Archean folds blocked foliation parallel slip. Large (12 meter thick) internally undeformed blocks indicate break up of the folded layer into macrogranular segments was preferred over coherent deformation. Deformation in bounding shear zones occurred under sub-greenschist conditions. Decreased grain size and increased fluid influx accompanied a transition from mechanical fracturing and frictional sliding to pressure solution slip. These observations indicate a fold strain model and are compatible with the fold-thrust model (Berg, 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nss Bulletin
    THE NSS BULLETIN QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 39 APRIL 1977 NUMBER 2 Contents Possible Exhumed Fossil Caverns in the Madison Group (Mississippian) of the Northern Rocky Mountains: A Discussion ............. ... ... .. ............... Newell P . Campbell 43 Archeology and Speleology: The Case for Conservation ............... .. David G. Anderson 55 The NSS Bulletin is published quarterly, in January, April, July, and October. Material to be included in a given number must be received at least 90 days prior to the first of the month in which publication is desired. The subscription rate in effect 1 August 1975: $10.00 per year. Oj/lce Address. NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CAVE AVENUE HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35810 Discussion of papers published in the Bulletin is invited. Discussion should be 2,000 words or less in length, with not more than 3 illustrations. Discussions should be forwarded to the appropriate editor within three months of publication of the original paper. MANAGING EDITOR JamaHectaes Big Cove Tannery Pennsylvania 17212 CONSERVATION EDITOR EXPLORATION EDITOR W.P. Bishop Barry F. Beck 5402 Wilson Lane Geology Department Bethesda, Md. 20014 Georgia Southwestern College Americus, Ga. 31709 LIFE SCIENCES EDITOR EARTH SCIENCES EDITOR Francis G. Howarth William B. White Bernice P. Bishop Museum Materials Research Laboratory Box6037 210 Engineering Science Building Honolulu, Haw. 96818 The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pa. 16802 SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITOR ANTHROPOLOGY EDITOR Stuart Sprague Maxine Haldemann-Klelndienst School of Social Sciences, UPO 846 162 Beechwood Avenue Morehead State University Willowdale, Ontario Morehead, Ky. 40351 Canada M2L !Kl Copyright 1977 by the National Speleological Society, Inc. The photocopying or reproduction or recording by any electrical or mechanical process of more than two pages of any issue of this journal still in print is a violation of copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Crow MR&I Draft EA
    Municipal, Rural, and Industrial Water System Crow Reservation, Montana Draft Environmental Assessment June 2016 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Statements The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. The mission of the Bureau of Indian Affairs is to enhance the quality of life, to promote economic opportunity, and to carry out the responsibility to protect and improve the trust assets of American Indians, Indian tribes, and Alaska Natives. This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Authority .......................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Purpose of the Proposed Action ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Need for the Proposed Action ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana/Dakotas Lands Day in September
    BLM • Last April, 129 sixth graders attended the first annual Sharing Trails event in Lewistown, Mont. It was a cooperative effort among the BLM Lewistown ECONOMIC IMPACTS Field Office and multiple stakeholders including the Judith Basin Back Coun- try Horsemen, Lewistown Honda, Little Belts Snowmobile Club, Montana SALARIES BY COMMUNITY Wilderness Association, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, (October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013) AN ANNUAL REPORT Bureau of Land Management Fergus County Weed District, and Central Montana Search & Rescue. The Bureau of Land Management event’s main purpose was to educate about trail etiquette and safety. Belle Fourche, South Dakota $1,434,000 Billings, Montana $18,383,000 • The Malta Field Office installed traffic counters at the Camp Creek and Mon- (includes Pompeys Pillar National Monument) PUBLISHED BY THE OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS tana Gulch campgrounds and Cottonwood Riparian Area. All the campsites Butte, Montana $4,458,000 at the Horse Corral camping area were leveled and repaired. One site was Dickinson, North Dakota $2,750,000 moved and expanded to accommodate longer trailers. In addition, the route Dillon, Montana $3,248,000 inventory was completed for the Little Rockies travel planning area and a Glasgow, Montana $686,000 National Public Lands Day cleanup project was held in Camp Creek and the Great Falls, Montana $930,000 town of Zortman. Havre, Montana $973,000 Bureau of Land Management Lewistown, Montana $6,509,000 • The Miles City Field Office hosted five Montana Conservation Crews (MCC). (includes Fort Benton, Montana) Montana State Office The first crew arrived at Pumpkin Creek Ranch in March to plant willow Malta, Montana $1,669,000 5001 Southgate Drive cuttings along the creek to decrease erosion and restore stream side vegeta- Miles City, Montana $8,684,000 Billings, Montana 59101 tion, benefiting wildlife and riparian functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Big Horn County and the Grow Indian Reservation Montana
    Please do not destroy or throw away this publication. If you have no further use for it, write to the Geological Survey at Washington andlask for a frank to return it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 856 GEOLOGY OF BIG HORN COUNTY AND THE GROW INDIAN RESERVATION MONTANA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE WATER COAL, OIL, AND GAS RESOURCES BY W. T. THOM, JR., G. M. HALL, C. H. WEGEMANN AND G. F. MOULTON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1935 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. - - - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Abstract. ____-_______-__--__---__--_--_----_--_ _---__--i -_--_--_ I Introduction....... _-________-____---__---_-_-_-_____-__-_-___-___ 3 Scope and purpose of the report.. _ __----___-____--________-___ 3 Location and geographic relations of the area. --____-_______-_ _ 3 History of the region__________._______________________________ 5 Legal status of the land _ ________________________________ _ __ 7 Field work... _ _.___--______------.__--___.__.___ ___ _ __ 8 Coal, oil, and gas_-_____________-___-_________.___________ 8 Ground water_-___.______- ____--.--__-. 9 Acknowledgments....--....--....-- ___________________________ 10 Geography ___-_____.____-_---_-_____---_--__-_.__________________ 12 Surface features and relief _ __________________________ _____ 12 Big Horn and Pryor Mountains _ __________________________ 13 Rosebud Mountains____________.______________________ _ _ 15 Plains.. _ _____ . _________________________ 17 . River valleys_-__-_____-____-_-._____________-___ _ _ ___ 18 Terraces.
    [Show full text]
  • Bats of the BLM Billings Field Office in South-Central Montana, with Emphasis on the Pryor Mountains
    Bats of the BLM Billings Field Office in south-central Montana, with Emphasis on the Pryor Mountains Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Billings Field Office 5001 Southgate Drive PO Box 36800 Billings, MT 59107 By: Paul Hendricks, Coburn Currier, and John Carlson Montana Natural Heritage Program Natural Resource Information System Montana State Library April 2004 Bats of the BLM Billings Field Office in south-central Montana, with Emphasis on the Pryor Mountains Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Billings Field Office5001 Southgate Drive PO Box 36800 Billings, MT 59107 Agreement Number: 1422E930A960015 By: Paul Hendricks, Coburn Currier, and John Carlson © 2004 Montana Natural Heritage Program P.O. Box 201800 • 1515 East Sixth Avenue • Helena, MT 59620-1800 • 406-444-5354 This document should be cited as follows: Hendricks, P., C. Currier, and J. Carlson. 2004. Bats of the BLM Billings Field Office in south-central Montana, with Emphasis on the Pryor Mountains. Report to Bureau of Land Management Billings Field Office. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 19 pp. + appendices. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Billings Bat, Eptesicus fuscus (13); Hoary Bat, Lasiurus Field Office harbors the greatest diversity of bat cinereus (1); Western Small-footed Myotis, Myotis species in Montana, including three species listed ciliolabrum (32); Western Long-eared Myotis, as Sensitive by the BLM or Species of Concern by Myotis evotis (80); Little Brown Myotis, Myotis the Montana Natural Heritage Program and the lucifugus (6); and Long-legged Myotis, Myotis Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks: Pallid Bat volans (9). A Pallid Bat was captured at the site (Antrozous pallidus), Spotted Bat (Euderma along the base of the Pryor Mountains where the maculatum), and Townsend’s Big-eared Bat species was first discovered in Montana in 1978, (Corynorhinus townsendii).
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL GUIDE T0 AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBES in MONTANA and WYOMING Project EXPORT
    CULTURAL GUIDE T0 AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBES IN MONTANA AND WYOMING Project EXPORT: American Indian Health Disparities Research Prepared Under Grant: 5 R24 MD000144 National Institutes of Health National Center for Minority Health and Health Disparities American Indian Health Research Program Black Hills State University, Spearfish, SD Montana-Wyoming Tribal Leaders Council, Billings, MT With the Tribes of Montana and Wyoming Editors: Jace DeCory, M.Ed. Lisa Bryan, Ph.D. Center for American Indian Studies Black Hills State University August 2006 Copyright © 2006 American Indian Health Research Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction Intent and Area of Study General Cultural History & Background of the Tribes of the Rocky Mountain Region Culture Related Questions Relevant to Conducting Research Studies Cultural Techniques to Gather Data and Analyze Information Implementing a Plan of Action: Focus on Cultural Beliefs, Values, Behavior, and Attitudes Chapter 2: Blackfeet Cultural Guide Chapter 3: Crow Cultural Guide Chapter 4: Fort Belknap Reservation Tribal Health Cultural Guide Chapter 5: Information for Medical Service Providers-Little Shell Chippewa Chapter 6: Northern Arapahoe Cultural Guide Chapter 7: Northern Cheyenne Tribal Health Department Cultural Guide Chapter 8: Summary and Conclusions Addendum: Related Web Sites Bibliography 2 Chapter 1: Introduction This Cultural Guide for health providers and researchers who work with the Tribes in Montana and Wyoming was developed as a collaborative effort between the participating Tribes, the Montana-Wyoming Tribal Leaders Council, and Black Hills State University. The concept of a Cultural Guide came about as a result of a partnership between the Tribal Leaders Council and Black Hills State University to conduct health services research and interventional studies with Tribal involvement and participation, under an NIH/NCMHD Project EXPORT grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Pryor Mountain National Wildhorse Range
    00/V ·.-.eci 090~ +C:~ O/L6· 1€l/1Ytlrfl8 AREA ATTRACTIONS egend Penn's Cabin Penn's cabin is located on top of East Pryor Moun­ National Forest Wilderness Study Areas Roads tain. Constructed in 1911, the cabin was a tempo­ rary shelter for railroad workers who cut ties. If Bureau of Land Management Pryor Mountain Open (4x4 recommended) you look carefully, you may still see old stumps left National Park Service Bighorn Tack-on Private from the time railroad ties were cut. State Burnt Timber Canyon Private Lost Water Canyon -·- Horse Range Boundary To Sage Creek Campground and Highway 31 O N Photo by SLM In 1921, a rancher named Penn filed a homestead claim on the lands surrounding the cabin. The government later acquired the property and the Vicinity Map cabin name endured. Historically, the cabin was used as a shelter for cowboys during severe weather. Wild horses can often be seen near the ca bin in the summer through earl y fall. Chief Plenty Coups State Park Custer National MONTANA •Ba rry's Landing Chief Plenty Coups State Park is located one mile PRYOR MOUNTAIN west of the community of Pryor on the Crow Indian Reservation. Park attractions include a small visitor center and the restored log home of the FOR MORE INFORMATION NATIONAL famous Crow chief. Plenty Coups is crediled with helping the Crow Indians make the transition CONTACT: between their native lifestyle to European culture. Crow WILDHORSE Bureau of Land Management Indian Billings Field Office Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area P.O. Box 36800 Reservation RANGE 5001 Southgate Drive The Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Billings, MT 59107 Visitor Center is located one-half mile east of (406) 896-5013 Lovell, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Regions of Montana
    FOREST REGIONS OF MONTANA STEPHEN F. ARNO This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-218 INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Ogden, Utah 84401 USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-218 April 1979 FOREST REGIONS OF MONTANA STEPHEN F. ARNO INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION Forest Service U. S. Department of Agriculture Ogden, Utah 84401 THE AUTHOR STEPHEN F. ARNO is a Plant Ecologist on the Forest Ecosystems research work unit at Missoula. He earned a B. S. in forestry at Washington State University and a master's degree and a Ph. D. in forestry and plant science at the University of Mon- tana before joining the Forest Service in 1970. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Robert Pfister (USDA Forest Service Project Leader) gave encouragement and advice throughout this study. The following for- esters from USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, shared their information on the distributions of indicator plants: Robert Bigler, Herbert Holdorf (Soil Scientist), John Joy, Bernard Kovalchik, Tom Lawrence, Gary Learn, B. John Losensky, and James Schaeffer. Similar information was provided by Joseph Antos, James Habeck, and Pete Zager from the Botany Department of the University of Montana and by Tad Weaver, John Rumley, and Frank Forcella from Montana State University. In addition, I would like to thank the many people who provided review comments during the develop- ment of this manuscript. Page INTRODUCTION .......................... DELINEATING MONTANA FOREST REGIONS .......... FOREST REGION DESCRIPTIONS ................ Northwestern Montana Forest Region ...........
    [Show full text]